CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[Epsylon3]

from my tests, the 1070/1080 can handle without real ui slow down a higher default intensity (on my miner), the problem is we reach a software/cuda limit with memory offsets when doing that.

So remains the possibility to run 2 instances of miner on these cards...

[1714780804]

1714780804

[1714780804]

1714780804

[1714780804]

1714780804

[1714780804]

1714780804

[pallas]

from my tests, the 1070/1080 can handle without real ui slow down a higher default intensity (on my miner), the problem is we reach a software/cuda limit with memory offsets when doing that.

So remains the possibility to run 2 instances of miner on these cards...

Are you talking about neoscrypt or in general?

[giagge]

Exist one program to powerful SIACOIN on Nvidia maxwell ?

Now mining at 1255 mh/s on windows 10 with gtx 980 1460 boost gpu .

Siacoin Go Pool miner hashrate:
– GTX 1080 – 1945 MHS
– GTX 1070 – 1466 MHS
– GTX 980 Ti – 1220 MHS
– GTX 970 – 803 MHS
– GTX 950 – 385 MHS
– GTX 750 Ti – 301 MHS
– RX 480 – 872 MHS
– R9 280X – 849 MHS
– R9 290x – 1116 MHS

http://cryptomining-blog.com/8080-siamining-another-open-public-siacoin-sc-gpu-mining-pool/

.

[Amph]

Exist one program to powerful SIACOIN on Nvidia maxwell ?

Now mining at 1255 mh/s on windows 10 with gtx 980 1460 boost gpu .

Siacoin Go Pool miner hashrate:
– GTX 1080 – 1945 MHS
– GTX 1070 – 1466 MHS
– GTX 980 Ti – 1220 MHS
– GTX 970 – 803 MHS
– GTX 950 – 385 MHS
– GTX 750 Ti – 301 MHS
– RX 480 – 872 MHS
– R9 280X – 849 MHS
– R9 290x – 1116 MHS

http://cryptomining-blog.com/8080-siamining-another-open-public-siacoin-sc-gpu-mining-pool/

.

i'm doing 905 with my 970, up to 1G with oc(i'm limiting it to 60% tdp) so a 1070 can do almost 1800 or 1g with oc

[Epsylon3]

from my tests, the 1070/1080 can handle without real ui slow down a higher default intensity (on my miner), the problem is we reach a software/cuda limit with memory offsets when doing that.

So remains the possibility to run 2 instances of miner on these cards...

Are you talking about neoscrypt or in general?

in general, on my miner the default is set to be able to use windows when you mine not the max possible (which also reduce the stability for long runs)

[scryptr]

Exist one program to powerful SIACOIN on Nvidia maxwell ?

Now mining at 1255 mh/s on windows 10 with gtx 980 1460 boost gpu .

Siacoin Go Pool miner hashrate:
– GTX 1080 – 1945 MHS
– GTX 1070 – 1466 MHS
– GTX 980 Ti – 1220 MHS
– GTX 970 – 803 MHS
– GTX 950 – 385 MHS
– GTX 750 Ti – 301 MHS
– RX 480 – 872 MHS
– R9 280X – 849 MHS
– R9 290x – 1116 MHS

http://cryptomining-blog.com/8080-siamining-another-open-public-siacoin-sc-gpu-mining-pool/

.

i'm doing 905 with my 970, up to 1G with oc(i'm limiting it to 60% tdp) so a 1070 can do almost 1800 or 1g with oc

SIACOIN IS ANOTHER VALUE ADDED COIN--

Like ETH, it is more than another clone coin.  SiaCoin (SC) stores data in the blockchain, you can both mine SC and offer drive space for data storage in return for SC.  My 980ti mined at 1400MH/s when running undisturbed.

I was hoping that one of the coding talents would add it to CCminer.  SC uses the Blake2b algo.       --scryptr

[Epsylon3]

indeed, like ETH, unfinished RPC. You need to modify yourself the wallet to be able to link a pool :p

[bathrobehero]

Memory runs cool and doesn't need to be cooled.

Generally true, but for Ethereum I measured the memory being as high as 98°C on a WF3OC 970 (and 104°C on the mini 1 fan models).
Meanwhile the GPU core was limited to 70 or 75°C and not even reaching that.

Reducing what is basically the intensity (–cuda-grid-size) helps but at the loss of hashrate.


Cryptomining blog did an article on it: http://cryptomining-blog.com/7501-nvidia-geforce-gtx-970-thermal-images-for-ethererum-and-decred-mining/




Regarding SIA, KlausT's SIA CUDA miner now supports poolmining but it's kind of glitchy and reports slower speeds even locally. And even lower speeds poolside.

Now with Claymore's dual Eth/Sia miner it will probably go way down in profitability.

[sp_]

The expensive 16nm chips are equipped with slow ggr5 memory and a slow 256bit bus.
My modded 512bit bussed 28nm r9 390 mine Etherum @ 39MHASH (full power, single card) or 27MHASH with lower power than the gtx 970. (messured in the wall). With the 390 I get I shitload of SIA coins for free, thanks to Claymore.

I have looked at klaust's blake2s cuda kernal. I could only gain 7%.

[Amph]

The expensive 16nm chips are equipped with slow ggr5 memory and a slow 256bit bus.
My modded 512bit bussed 28nm r9 390 mine Etherum @ 39MHASH (full power, single card) or 27MHASH with lower power than the gtx 970. (messured in the wall). With the 390 I get I shitload of SIA coins for free, thanks to Claymore.

I have looked at klaust's blake2s cuda kernal. I could only gain 7%.

can you post a screen of your 390 doing 39MH, because i find it hard to believe this not even Wolfo was able to reach that hash(i see his highest was 33MH)

and even if that was possible your consumption was probably 350w with a single gpu, a 1070 can do on linux 37MH with 150w, so no you can't beat 16nm sry

[sp_]

The 390 g1 gaming comes with a 6 pin and a 8 pin connector.

6pin= 75Watt
8pin= 150Watt
Motherboard 66 watt

MAX power is 291 watt, but the wall readings is abit higher. (Powered usb risers)

[sp_]

Not even Wolfo was able to reach that hash(i see his highest was 33MH)

He is using old 290x and mod the code. I mod the bios.

[sp_]

can you post a screen of your 390 doing 39MH

https://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/8243/390-nitro-39-mh-s-running-at-55-60-c-for-6-days#latest

[pallas]

The 390 g1 gaming comes with a 6 pin and a 8 pin connector.

6pin= 75Watt
8pin= 150Watt
Motherboard 66 watt

MAX power is 291 watt, but the wall readings is abit higher. (Powered usb risers)

there is nothing stopping the card to draw more than those "max" values.
only thing that matters is power meter at the wall plug.

[Amph]

The 390 g1 gaming comes with a 6 pin and a 8 pin connector.

6pin= 75Watt
8pin= 150Watt
Motherboard 66 watt

MAX power is 291 watt, but the wall readings is abit higher. (Powered usb risers)

there is nothing stopping the card to draw more than those "max" values.
only thing that matters is power meter at the wall plug.

yes in fact in that case some of those things, will simply melt away

[pallas]

The 390 g1 gaming comes with a 6 pin and a 8 pin connector.

6pin= 75Watt
8pin= 150Watt
Motherboard 66 watt

MAX power is 291 watt, but the wall readings is abit higher. (Powered usb risers)

there is nothing stopping the card to draw more than those "max" values.
only thing that matters is power meter at the wall plug.

yes in fact in that cse some of those thing, will simply melt away

and, again, pure Mh/s don't matter: it's efficiency that matters (Mh/s)/W, unless you run on free power.

[Amph]

The 390 g1 gaming comes with a 6 pin and a 8 pin connector.

6pin= 75Watt
8pin= 150Watt
Motherboard 66 watt

MAX power is 291 watt, but the wall readings is abit higher. (Powered usb risers)

there is nothing stopping the card to draw more than those "max" values.
only thing that matters is power meter at the wall plug.

yes in fact in that cse some of those thing, will simply melt away

and, again, pure Mh/s don't matter: it's efficiency that matters (Mh/s)/W, unless you run on free power.

yeah also 300w for 40MH is not that impressive actually, because 6 x 970 can do the same, 120MH at 900w(6 x 140w + system) and without any tweaking just PL limited to 60%, like i've done in my case

if we were to ignore the consumption we would still use monsters like 7990 or 290x2(this can do 51MH)

[sp_]

yeah also 300w for 40MH is not that impressive actually, because 6 x 970 can do the same, 120MH at 900w(6 x 140w + system)

I mine @ 27MHASH + 415MHASH sia. I save 160watt per card. Then I can mine with 2x the number of cards. A brand new 390 only cost around 250$

[Amph]

yeah also 300w for 40MH is not that impressive actually, because 6 x 970 can do the same, 120MH at 900w(6 x 140w + system)

I mine @ 27MHASH + 415MHASH sia. I save 160watt per card. Then I can mine with 2x the number of cards. A brand new 390 only cost around 250$

a 970 cost less than 200 euro now, the dual mining is possible for nvidia too, just no one wants to do it, i remember you were working on one....

[ltc_bilic]

a 970 cost less than 200 euro now, the dual mining is possible for nvidia too, just no one wants to do it, i remember you were working on one....

where? link please,....