CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[sp_]

Signatum #4 has now been sendt to the donators.

check your spam inboxes.

[strannik951159]

Signatum #4 has now been sendt to the donators.

check your spam inboxes.

And how can I perform a reboot of the miner on error? When the card stops

[droghtak]

Signatum #4 has now been sendt to the donators.

check your spam inboxes.

thanks

so this spmod4 will work better than spmod3 at lower TDP? in the mail you say to put the TDP at 100%

[sp_]

Skunk sp-mod #4
New World record hashrate on the gtx 1070

[strannik951159]

Skunk sp-mod #4
New World record hashrate on the gtx 1070

Is this speed when launching the miner? After 3 - 6 minutes? When the GPU heats up and offsets the frequencies? Meiner excellent, thank you

[yunihuni]

Skunk sp-mod #4
New World record hashrate on the gtx 1070

Is this speed when launching the miner? After 3 - 6 minutes? When the GPU heats up and offsets the frequencies? Meiner excellent, thank you

My miner(sp-mod#3) shows up when launching 230mh but after 5 min drops to 226mh and goes as well arround hashrate. So i guess its not stable hashrate for sp-mod#4. We need see hashrate after 5min.

[strannik951159]

Skunk sp-mod #4
New World record hashrate on the gtx 1070

Is this speed when launching the miner? After 3 - 6 minutes? When the GPU heats up and offsets the frequencies? Meiner excellent, thank you

My miner(sp-mod#3) shows up when launching 230mh but after 5 min drops to 226mh and goes as well arround hashrate. So i guess its not stable hashrate for sp-mod#4. We need see hashrate after 5min.

[2017-08-04 22:58:43] [S/A/T]: 0/525/527, diff: 0.150, 118.53MH/s yes!
[2017-08-04 22:58:44] [S/A/T]: 0/526/528, diff: 0.065, 118.53MH/s yes!
[2017-08-04 22:58:46] GPU#3:GeForce GTX 1070, 29.87MH/s
[2017-08-04 22:58:46] GPU#3:GeForce GTX 1070, 0.18MH/W, 0.015MH/Mhz
[2017-08-04 22:58:46] GPU#3:GeForce GTX 1070, 69C(F:100%) 2019/3402MHz(164W)
[2017-08-04 22:58:47] [S/A/T]: 0/527/529, diff: 0.227, 118.53MH/s yes!
[2017-08-04 22:58:50] GPU#1:GeForce GTX 1070, 29.53MH/s
[2017-08-04 22:58:50] GPU#1:GeForce GTX 1070, 0.19MH/W, 0.015MH/Mhz
[2017-08-04 22:58:50] GPU#1:GeForce GTX 1070, 64C(F:100%) 1999/3402MHz(152W)
[2017-08-04 22:58:50] [S/A/T]: 0/528/530, diff: 0.095, 118.53MH/s yes!
[2017-08-04 22:58:50] GPU#2:GeForce GTX 1070, 30.01MH/s
[2017-08-04 22:58:50] GPU#2:GeForce GTX 1070, 0.19MH/W, 0.015MH/Mhz
[2017-08-04 22:58:50] GPU#2:GeForce GTX 1070, 63C(F:100%) 2033/3402MHz(162W)
[2017-08-04 22:58:52] [S/A/T]: 0/529/531, diff: 0.101, 118.55MH/s yes!
[2017-08-04 22:58:55] [S/A/T]: 0/530/532, diff: 0.068, 118.55MH/s yes!

This is after 10 minutes, which is an excellent result for these maps
zotac mini

[mantor84]

Hmm seems it doesn't work as smooth as sp#3.

Same settings but this time I'm getting "gpux: unspecified launch failure " after a short period of time.

Hope it will work more stable after I reduce the overclocking settings... but strange at all thought the settings couldn't stay the same.


@SP
Could you force a restart if an error occured like "gpux: unspecified launch failure "?
Right now it's an endless loop...

[strannik951159]

Hmm seems it doesn't work as smooth as sp#3.

Same settings but this time I'm getting "gpux: unspecified launch failure " after a short period of time.

Hope it will work more stable after I reduce the overclocking settings... but strange at all thought the settings could stay the same.

Overclocking, it helped me. But it gave more speed

[lanotrader]

#3 works better for my gtx 1060 rig.

#3 136~137MH/s
#4 134~135MH/s

[lanciaominer]

Hmm seems it doesn't work as smooth as sp#3.

Same settings but this time I'm getting "gpux: unspecified launch failure " after a short period of time.

Hope it will work more stable after I reduce the overclocking settings... but strange at all thought the settings couldn't stay the same.


@SP
Could you force a restart if an error occured like "gpux: unspecified launch failure "?
Right now it's an endless loop...

same here
how much was your memory ? mine was set to -450

[yunihuni]

Hmm seems it doesn't work as smooth as sp#3.

Same settings but this time I'm getting "gpux: unspecified launch failure " after a short period of time.

Hope it will work more stable after I reduce the overclocking settings... but strange at all thought the settings couldn't stay the same.


@SP
Could you force a restart if an error occured like "gpux: unspecified launch failure "?
Right now it's an endless loop...

same here
how much was your memory ? mine was set to -450

Thats mine settings. And very stable.

https://i.hizliresim.com/ER0MdZ.png

[mantor84]

Hmm seems it doesn't work as smooth as sp#3.

Same settings but this time I'm getting "gpux: unspecified launch failure " after a short period of time.

Hope it will work more stable after I reduce the overclocking settings... but strange at all thought the settings couldn't stay the same.


@SP
Could you force a restart if an error occured like "gpux: unspecified launch failure "?
Right now it's an endless loop...

same here
how much was your memory ? mine was set to -450

gtx 1080ti aorus extreme
memory clock: - 500
core clock: + 120
TDP: 65%

all the same gpus' and it was working with sp#3.
guess I need to switch back to sp#3 need the restart function if an issue occured.

In sp#4 it's just an endless loop if an issue occured.
"gpux: unspecified launch failure "
"gpux: unspecified launch failure "
"gpux: unspecified launch failure "

[matovicv]

Hmm seems it doesn't work as smooth as sp#3.

Same settings but this time I'm getting "gpux: unspecified launch failure " after a short period of time.

Hope it will work more stable after I reduce the overclocking settings... but strange at all thought the settings couldn't stay the same.


@SP
Could you force a restart if an error occured like "gpux: unspecified launch failure "?
Right now it's an endless loop...

same here
how much was your memory ? mine was set to -450

gtx 1080ti aorus extreme
memory clock: - 500
core clock: + 120
TDP: 65%

all the same gpus' and it was working with sp#3.
guess I need to switch back to sp#3 need the restart function if an issue occured.

In sp#4 it's just an endless loop if an issue occured.
"gpux: unspecified launch failure "
"gpux: unspecified launch failure "
"gpux: unspecified launch failure "

Same error here. We need quick fix so it can restart if get this error.
Also why is mod4 compiled with CUDA 7.5, isnt CUDA 8 better?

[l187l]

Skunk sp-mod #4
New World record hashrate on the gtx 1070

https://i.imgur.com/o2R3j8P.png

lol what? World record? You're kidding right?

https://i.gyazo.com/dfaebe590821806de4869310efe544b4.png



Nice try though

edit: And this is on SP mod 3... Was getting the same on the CWI miner. Send me SP mod 4 so I can see what kind of boosts it really gives... For all we know, you just OC'd the shit out off your card.

[cashen]

I saw an overall 5% jump on my 1080s and 1080 TIs.

The biggest jump in on my non FE 1080s. all are solid 37 now.

Thanks SP

[sp_]

Also why is mod4 compiled with CUDA 7.5, isnt CUDA 8 better?

[sp_]

In 24hours I will release a new mod with 0.1BTC buy in and 2% fee.  The algo is very profitable with my modded kernel.

Just to vouch for SP. I purchased the sigt mod at the very beginning. With 21 - 1080 Ti, I made $7000 mining 152,000 sigt.
His miner was 30% faster at 70% TDP, so his mod contributed $2100 in earnings.

0.1 BTC, $268 might be a bit steep for some people, especially if it's a new coin. We wont know how profitable it will be until it hits the exchange.
Sigt definitely paid off though. Even if I cost 0.1 BTC, I personally will still be purchasing it.

You made $2100 with 21 cards. Some of my buyers have more than 1000 cards.

[lupanar]

Signatum #4 has now been sendt to the donators.

check your spam inboxes.

Unfortunately no speed increase at 1060 cards. Pity 

[mystere_miner]

The opensource still does 19MHASH on the gtx 1070. Sp-mod #4 is 60% faster than the opensource. And around 10% faster than the palgin binary (Released 3 days after sp-mod #3)

My work was stolen and spread. What do you expect me to do??

I don't know, honor your promises?  

That's just me though...

#4 has actually caused a decrease in my output.  I went from 315MH/s to 307 with #4, same settings.  I thought #4 was supposed to work better at lower TDP?  Which you said repeatedly....  Oh well...

Glad I held onto my rewards until the price re-peaked at .00001500, at least it sort of helped me get closer to being in the black.

Also... why is this thing using 100% of my CPU?  around 75% for ccminer and 25% for System?

EDIT: Even using recommended settings 100% power, -500Mem +100 (anything faster crashes) I still get better numbers with spmod3, 344MH/s with spmod3, 333 MH/s with spmod4.   I have 6x1080Ti and 1x1070, 1080Ti's are getting roughly 53Mh/z and 1070 28MH/s.