CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[deuce9]

When I run the 32 bit I get an error that cudart32_90.dll is missing.  Where can I get this file?

http://rgho.st/8gRrD9g9Z - just press Download or "Cкaчaть" if you see russian version. Put this file into miner folder

Thank you.  

With 32bit skminer nexus mod 8.2 I still can't get higher than 188 mh with 1080ti

at 100% power?

At 120 tdp zotac amp extreme.  What do you get?

SP do u have 1080ti to test with?

use 8.2 32bit.

core +100. mem +250. tdp 65 getting 230-235 megahash

you need to trial and error to find the right intensity.

[shadowhlohavec]

yeah nexus is strange algo

didn't find any blocks with 700mhs for 4 days with spmod 7 and intensity 6

7.2 - 1060 85 mhs no oc, light cpu no change,
8 - cant run, still in loop

will do more tests

[damniatx]

yeah nexus is strange algo

didn't find any blocks with 700mhs for 4 days with spmod 7 and intensity 6

7.2 - 1060 85 mhs no oc, light cpu no change,
8 - cant run, still in loop

will do more tests

4 days ?, weird

[deuce9]

yeah nexus is strange algo

didn't find any blocks with 700mhs for 4 days with spmod 7 and intensity 6

7.2 - 1060 85 mhs no oc, light cpu no change,
8 - cant run, still in loop

will do more tests

if its in a loop you need to update the nvidia driver i believe.

[mystere_miner]

Yowsa!  Tpruvot's new ccminer 2.2 has a new skunk algorithm that beats sp by quite a bit.  Running on 1080Ti with only -i 23 and running at 90% tdp I get 56MH/s.  Check it out.

[shubaduba]

Yowsa!  Tpruvot's new ccminer 2.2 has a new skunk algorithm that beats sp by quite a bit.  Running on 1080Ti with only -i 23 and running at 90% tdp I get 56MH/s.  Check it out.

What about accepted hashrate at pool side?

[fr4nkthetank]

Yowsa!  Tpruvot's new ccminer 2.2 has a new skunk algorithm that beats sp by quite a bit.  Running on 1080Ti with only -i 23 and running at 90% tdp I get 56MH/s.  Check it out.

What about accepted hashrate at pool side?

im sure its fine, considering this isnt a newbie dev if you catch my drift.  will monitor but so far 52-53mhs running at 80tdp with slight core overclock.

[sp_]

Another  copy paste job from Tpruvot. With the same error in the hashrate as krlx. 20% is lost on the pool.
The free palgin mod or the donation miner (sp-mod) is working at full speed.

[sp_]

His latest miner shines in groestl, myriad-groestl and neoscrypt (tested on 1070) compared to others.

Klaust's Myriad-groestl is showing high rates in the miner window, but low rates on the pool

Yeah. It's really wierd. I don't actually know why.

Bugfix:

__host__ void myriadgroestl_cpu_hash(int thr_id, uint32_t threads, uint32_t startNounce, uint32_t *nounce)
{
    const uint32_t threadsperblock = 512;
   const uint32_t threadsperblock2 = 512; //1536;

I see that you have applied my fix.

https://github.com/KlausT/ccminer/commit/4c2d933aee88a6cef8676eb3dbc7b11696e925da

I think it's wierd too. Maybe you should report this to the NVIDIA devs in a bugreport.

[thinkfar]

yeah nexus is strange algo

didn't find any blocks with 700mhs for 4 days with spmod 7 and intensity 6

7.2 - 1060 85 mhs no oc, light cpu no change,
8 - cant run, still in loop

will do more tests

I so far have got only one block within a day for 1444mhs:( . I gave up.

[damniatx]

yeah nexus is strange algo

didn't find any blocks with 700mhs for 4 days with spmod 7 and intensity 6

7.2 - 1060 85 mhs no oc, light cpu no change,
8 - cant run, still in loop

will do more tests

I so far have got only one block within a day for 1444mhs:( . I gave up.

woa is it really that bad

[sp_]

One block is around $30. Wich version did you use to find the block?

[..XyZ..]

One block is around $30. Wich version did you use to find the block?

https://image.ibb.co/jXnNjv/nexus14.png

Any fix for 1080ti speeds incoming? Got ~180 Mh on any intensity on both x86 and x64 versions of miner.

[mystere_miner]

Another  copy paste job from Tpruvot. With the same error in the hashrate as krlx. 20% is lost on the pool.
The free palgin mod or the donation miner (sp-mod) is working at full speed.

I'm getting more shares with tpruvot's 2.2 than I do with your mod 7.  About 14 coins per hour with my 300MH/s rate with mod 7, and i'm getting 18 coins per hour with tpruvot 2.2.  reported hashrate can say whatever, but actual results don't lie.

[sp_]

Another  copy paste job from Tpruvot. With the same error in the hashrate as krlx. 20% is lost on the pool.
The free palgin mod or the donation miner (sp-mod) is working at full speed.

I'm getting more shares with tpruvot's 2.2 than I do with your mod 7.  About 14 coins per hour with my 300MH/s rate with mod 7, and i'm getting 18 coins per hour with tpruvot 2.2.  reported hashrate can say whatever, but actual results don't lie.

You can all try it for yourselves. Test with palgin and krnlx and spmod3/5 miners. I tested these with suprnova. Since the hash rate in the dashboard being shown by suprnova is continuously changing, I decided to test the miners with the SIGT coins I'm mining.

Yes, it was not a scientific test, I just wanted to have a rough estimate because I noticed the coins I'm mining suddenly dropped when I used krnlx. I wasn't sure at first if it was because of the difficulty in SIGT and the many miners in suprnova or it was due to krnlx. So I created 2 accounts in suprnova. I have  2 almost identical rigs, 6 x GTX1060 on rig1 and 5 x GTX 1060 on rig2. The first test was running spmod3 on rig2 and krnlx on rig1. I didn't configure the rigs to be of the exact number of gpus because I will lose mining time for a couple of hours if disable one gpu. After more than an hour, I had almost the same number of coins mined. It meant krnlx was mining slower than spmod3 because it was using 6 gpus. The next test was running palginmod on rig 1 and spmod3 on rig2. This time, palginmod mined more coins, which should be the case since it is running on 6 gpus. If I divide the number of coins per gpu, the average coin per gpu was the same for palginmod and spmod3, which meant in my crude test that both miners seem to be performing equally.

There seems to be a problem with krnlx even it is showing more hash rate per second. Those of you who have a lot more resources and time can test krnlx more extensively.  For now, I'm going back to palginmod or spmod. Check also a test run by jimboscott here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2030529.4700   He has the same observations.

[HeroKung]

what's the best config for
1.gtx 1070 = power / core / mem
2.gtx 1060 = power / core / mem

thanks sp_

[Amph]

is the krnlx  miner the same as epsylon miner? why you are talking about that sp? he clearly said "and no, i didnt "simply" put knrlx code"...

[damniatx]

is the krnlx  miner the same as epsylon mienr? why you are talking about that sp?

it is not the same, the epsylon said on his thread, it's not simply copy-paste to compile it.
And for sp, He just want to sell his miner, so that's Marketing for him. bad mouthing other miner software.

[edumrtnz]

190 mhs 1080 ti on windows 10 384.94 driver 84 intensity

1040 mhs x7 1070 at 100 power +200mem +150 core

thats bad

[sp_]

what's the best config for
1.gtx 1070 = power / core / mem
2.gtx 1060 = power / core / mem

thanks sp_

-500 memory, 100% tdp, +150 core 1070, +200 core 1060. 394.84 driver.