CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[Vokas123]

Night tests results:
As sp said, i used default intensity (28) and --gputhreads 2:
spmod skein: miner hashrate 5900-6200, pool hashrate - 4300-5300
Also i tried to launch Alexis miner with 2 threads per gpu -d 0,0,1,1 etc... and 3% less hashrate and without fees
sp, i know what your kernels speed always close to pool speed, but skein - need to fix it.

Aha-ha all sp "optimisations" of skein are just options setting.
Now I get 440 from 1060 (2200 from 5*1060) with Alexis78
https://image.ibb.co/e0j2wv/123.png
Thank you  

So, the real switch in Alexis miner to get these results is "-t 10" (for 5 cards) or "-d 0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4"?

Thanks.

[car1999]

I'll try  alexis miner on my 1080ti

[alexis78]

Night tests results:
As sp said, i used default intensity (28) and --gputhreads 2:
spmod skein: miner hashrate 5900-6200, pool hashrate - 4300-5300
Also i tried to launch Alexis miner with 2 threads per gpu -d 0,0,1,1 etc... and 3% less hashrate and without fees
sp, i know what your kernels speed always close to pool speed, but skein - need to fix it.

Aha-ha all sp "optimisations" of skein are just options setting.
Now I get 440 from 1060 (2200 from 5*1060) with Alexis78

Thank you  

So, the real switch in Alexis miner to get these results is "-t 10" (for 5 cards) or "-d 0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4"?

Thanks.

Beware of pool side hashrate if you try it... It has failed on my end.
Mr. Tanguy also reported a failure on utilizing multiple host threads per single device on a chat we had, long time ago.
The failure we encountered is the same as above. Bigger hashrate miner side. Lower hashrate on pool.

[candyiman]

Night tests results:
As sp said, i used default intensity (28) and --gputhreads 2:
spmod skein: miner hashrate 5900-6200, pool hashrate - 4300-5300
Also i tried to launch Alexis miner with 2 threads per gpu -d 0,0,1,1 etc... and 3% less hashrate and without fees
sp, i know what your kernels speed always close to pool speed, but skein - need to fix it.

Aha-ha all sp "optimisations" of skein are just options setting.
Now I get 440 from 1060 (2200 from 5*1060) with Alexis78

Thank you  

So, the real switch in Alexis miner to get these results is "-t 10" (for 5 cards) or "-d 0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4"?

Thanks.

Beware of pool side hashrate if you try it... It has failed on my end.
Mr. Tanguy also reported a failure on utilizing multiple host threads per single device on a chat we had, long time ago.
The failure we encountered is the same as above. Bigger hashrate miner side. Lower hashrate on pool.

hey alexis can you give me  a Tip?  I did not manage to go with alexis78.exe on Neoscrypt with a 1060 3gb Samsung mem  to even 800 Hashes (or 900 like Abdu posted)

Ive downloaded 1-2 versions of your miners including the one in Nemos miner    still same hashes

my best was with Crazy  OC settings 756


And i 16 does not work, only i 15 and  below

[Zaphy]

This is exactly what I'm seeing on my overnight tests. The hashrate displayed by ccminer in this new skein mod doesn't translate to the hashrate on the pool. Curious now if there is an optimisation or just assumed there is one due to a higher reported number by ccminer when using multiple gpu threads. I can deal with the mismatch of numbers as long as there is ultimately an optimisation.

Clarification would be good!

[Zean]

Night tests results:
As sp said, i used default intensity (28) and --gputhreads 2:
spmod skein: miner hashrate 5900-6200, pool hashrate - 4300-5300
Also i tried to launch Alexis miner with 2 threads per gpu -d 0,0,1,1 etc... and 3% less hashrate and without fees
sp, i know what your kernels speed always close to pool speed, but skein - need to fix it.

Aha-ha all sp "optimisations" of skein are just options setting.
Now I get 440 from 1060 (2200 from 5*1060) with Alexis78
https://image.ibb.co/e0j2wv/123.png
Thank you  

So, the real switch in Alexis miner to get these results is "-t 10" (for 5 cards) or "-d 0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4"?

Thanks.

Beware of pool side hashrate if you try it... It has failed on my end.
Mr. Tanguy also reported a failure on utilizing multiple host threads per single device on a chat we had, long time ago.
The failure we encountered is the same as above. Bigger hashrate miner side. Lower hashrate on pool.

Is bigger hashrate applied solo mining?

[scryptr]

This is exactly what I'm seeing on my overnight tests. The hashrate displayed by ccminer in this new skein mod doesn't translate to the hashrate on the pool. Curious now if there is an optimisation or just assumed there is one due to a higher reported number by ccminer when using multiple gpu threads. I can deal with the mismatch of numbers as long as there is ultimately an optimisation.

Clarification would be good!

THE MULTI-THREAD PER GPU HASH RATE IS LIKELY WRONG MINER-SIDE--

This multi-thread per GPU strategy was experimented with in the X11/Quark GPU mining era.  It was an attempt at emulating the feature which works in SGminer.  The experiment caused a lot of excitement, I was an enthusiastic beta-tester, but results pool-side were not so exciting.  Miners get paid by pool-side results.

--scryptr

[erbott1]

These are new coins here are the announcement threads. New coins are a bit risky, but with abit of luck you can make $30 per card per day.

No pools , and no gpu miner (that I know of).

virta-unique-coin:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1966621

coimatic-2:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1961830.0

Yes they were risky...atleast coimatic 2.0. See thread -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1835672.840 and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1961830.380

Atleast some serious scam clouds above those coins...

[Amph]

These are new coins here are the announcement threads. New coins are a bit risky, but with abit of luck you can make $30 per card per day.

No pools , and no gpu miner (that I know of).

virta-unique-coin:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1966621

coimatic-2:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1961830.0

Yes they were risky...atleast coimatic 2.0. See thread -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1835672.840 and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1961830.380

Atleast some serious scam clouds above those coins...

and virta unique coin is trash not profitable just look at the emission and volume...

[abudfv2008]

Night tests results:
As sp said, i used default intensity (28) and --gputhreads 2:
spmod skein: miner hashrate 5900-6200, pool hashrate - 4300-5300
Also i tried to launch Alexis miner with 2 threads per gpu -d 0,0,1,1 etc... and 3% less hashrate and without fees
sp, i know what your kernels speed always close to pool speed, but skein - need to fix it.

Aha-ha all sp "optimisations" of skein are just options setting.
Now I get 440 from 1060 (2200 from 5*1060) with Alexis78

Thank you  

So, the real switch in Alexis miner to get these results is "-t 10" (for 5 cards) or "-d 0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4"?

Thanks.

Beware of pool side hashrate if you try it... It has failed on my end.
Mr. Tanguy also reported a failure on utilizing multiple host threads per single device on a chat we had, long time ago.
The failure we encountered is the same as above. Bigger hashrate miner side. Lower hashrate on pool.

Yes it is so. Sad

[grchina]

Hey sp any chance you can make a nv gpu miner for xevan algo?I think they even have a bounty for it

[mystere_miner]

wrong on all accounts, other than he source code (which sp isn't providing n violation of the gp)

https://leland.me/gpl-myths/

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#CanIDemandACopy

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#DoesTheGPLAllowRequireFee

and many more.. I suggest you read through it

And where does it say you get to redistribute someone elses code? I have read through it, I'm the one who quoted such sources a year ago when this popped up.

You're paraphrasing, IF XYZ commits a crime, I too get to commit that crime and it's no longer a crime. That's not the way it works. He's required to give out the source code, that DOES NOT allow you to resell his code or give it out for free.

You literally quoted articles supporting that you have to give out the source, not that you can resell it or give away HIS source for free. Once again I never said he doesn't need to give out his source (I've literally said opposite of that multiple times), what we're discussing is the legality of someone giving out his code and reselling HIS work. GPL code is just GPL code, it doesn't include his changes as far as being able to redistribute it.

Pretty big difference here. I suggest you actually read the post you're responding to before copy/pasting answers.

Since you can't be bothered to read the links...

The GPL is a free software license, and therefore it permits people to use and even redistribute the software without being required to pay anyone a fee for doing so.
You can charge people a fee to get a copy from you. You can't require people to pay you when they get a copy from someone else.

Also:

If I distribute GPL'd software for a fee, am I required to also make it available to the public without a charge? (#DoesTheGPLRequireAvailabilityToPublic)

No. However, if someone pays your fee and gets a copy, the GPL gives them the freedom to release it to the public, with or without a fee. For example, someone could pay your fee, and then put her copy on a web site for the general public.

Also:

Does the GPL allow me to distribute copies under a nondisclosure agreement? (#DoesTheGPLAllowNDA)

No. The GPL says that anyone who receives a copy from you has the right to redistribute copies, modified or not. You are not allowed to distribute the work on any more restrictive basis.

And:

Does the GPL allow me to distribute a modified or beta version under a nondisclosure agreement? (#DoesTheGPLAllowModNDA)

No. The GPL says that your modified versions must carry all the freedoms stated in the GPL. Thus, anyone who receives a copy of your version from you has the right to redistribute copies (modified or not) of that version. You may not distribute any version of the work on a more restrictive basis.

Seriously.  If you still persist saying you have read this, you clearly have not.  It's plain as fucking day, spelled out in very simple English.  And it says it over, and over, and over.  You'd have to be blind as a bat to miss this if you had actually read it.  I didn't even include all the references, there are a bunch more.

[brownfly]

1) Everything is seen on picture: miner, hashrate. So I don't know whether you have right alexis78 miner or not.
2) Use "-d 0,2"

where did you get the binary? the Git has only source code.

[cashen]

I think these algos could do very well with a boost.

x17
Veltor
Xevan
hmq1725
c11

[airwalker2662]

I think these algos could do very well with a boost.

x17
Veltor
Xevan
hmq1725
c11

You willing to pay $150 + possible fee for each? SP is no longer interested in open source. I myself am hoping alexis makes a return to github. 10 months old and still the some of the greatest work I've seen, free and without ego.

-A prior SP fan and donator.

[valperaled]

I'm interested in private miners.... How do I confirm donation? by mail? what is the sp_ donation address?

I have modified and improved the speed of some of the hashing algorithms for the NVIDIA GPU's compute 5.0 or newer.
Most of the Hashimprovements are done by me, but some are done by djm34, Schleicher(klaus_t),Epsylon3(tvprovut),tsiv,alexis and pallas.

cuda 7.5:

1.5.81(sp-MOD) is available here: (01-jan-2017)

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/

The sourcecode is available here:

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer

cuda 6.5:

1.5.74(sp-MOD) is available here: (15-nov-2015)

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/

The sourcecode is available here:

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer


Pascalcoin beta solominer  sp-mod #2 (SOLO miner)

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/tag/pascal-spmod2

LBRY  sp-mod #6 (feeminer. 1.67% fee)

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/tag/LBRYSP6

I have private miners for the people who donate (donators will get updates).

1. 0.05BTC: Pentablake +100-120% (3 releases)
2. 0.05BTC: Cryptonight +10% (one release) Maxwell edition (750ti and 970) (300h/s gtx 750ti)
3. 0.05BTC: Spreadcoin +20-30% (13 releases) (5.6MHASH on gtx 1060 3gb and 9.3 MHASH on gtx 1070)
4. 0.1BTC: All nicehash algos optimized. 0-10% (6 releases)(x11,x13,x14,x15,x17,nist5,quark,skein,lyra2v2,neoscrypt)
5. 0.1BTC: decred +18-25% (9 releases) (Full sourcecode(linux) 0.4BTC)
6. 0.2BTC: Vcash(+13%+decred(+18-25%) (0.1 btc discount for the decred buyers) (6 releases)
7. 0.05BTC: LBRY +10-25% on compute 5.2 cards(0.1BTC + 1.5 minute per hour donation mining (2.5%))(4 releases)
8. 0.05BTC Cryptonite sp-mod (+20%) (3 releases) (18-19MHASH on gtx 1070) (30Mhash 1080ti)
9. 0.05BTC groestl sp-mod (1 release) Groestl/Diamond groestl speed: 40MHASH gtx 1070, Myriad groestl speed: (75MHASH gtx 1070, 40MHASH gtx 1060 3gb)
10. 0.05BTC NEXUS sp-mod (8 releases) 160MHASH gtx 1070, 200MHASH gtx 1080
11. 0.05BTC Bitcore sp-mod(2 releases)15-30% faster than the opensource on pascal cards(20.7 MHASH gtx 1070)
12. 0.05BTC Skunkhash/Signatum sp-mod (8 releases) (33.2 MHASH 1070)
13. 0.1BTC Tribus sp-mod(2 releases)(+60%)(42MHASH 1060 3gb, 68MHASH 1070, 120MHASH 1080ti) 2% fee
14. 0.05BTC nist5 sp-mod (1 release)(+10%)( 59MHASH 1070)
15. 0.05BTC blake2s sp-mod (1 release)(+10%)( 4900MHASH 1070)
16. 0.1BTC cryptonight pascal (3 releases) (550-600h 1060 3gb/6gb, 750-800 1070)
17. 0.05BTC skein pascal (1 releases) (400+ 1060 6gb, 600+ 1070)

http://i63.tinypic.com/dpih74.png

[bensam1231]

I think these algos could do very well with a boost.

x17
Veltor
Xevan
hmq1725
c11

You willing to pay $150 + possible fee for each? SP is no longer interested in open source. I myself am hoping alexis makes a return to github. 10 months old and still the some of the greatest work I've seen, free and without ego.

-A prior SP fan and donator.

Thing about open source developers is they don't get paid (usually), meaning there isn't any incentive to do it. That's why you pay people like SP so they keep doing it, it doesn't go completely private, and then you get screwed by private kernel farm owners. You can look at the development of Equihash miners for Nvidia as a pretty good example of that. This thread used to be constant bitching by developers about how they don't get donations, now it's just bitching at SP for getting paid for his work.

Hope doesn't keep businesses alive.

[Amph]

how much is the skunk 8 faster than the 6?

Depends on the card, but I think around +4% or more,

why i didn't receive it in my mail? does it require another subscription?

[sp_]

You should get it, it's free for the donators.. pm me.

[abudfv2008]

I think these algos could do very well with a boost.

x17
Veltor
Xevan
hmq1725
c11

You willing to pay $150 + possible fee for each? SP is no longer interested in open source.

You forgot the BTC/USD rate.
Now sp_ whats to get 240-480$ not 150$ for stolen work