CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[garytheasshole]

Nexus #10 sendt to the donators. This version has pool support as well.

gtx 1070 g1 gaming. +150 core, -500 memory 100% tdp 164 MHASH

Code:

Stats] 145.388 MH/s | Blks/24h 0.000 | A=0 R=0 | Diff=3896.9174 | 00:00:02:27

Massive 20 MH/s increase, much profit!

[nostrakhan]

Nexus #10 sendt to the donators. This version has pool support as well.

gtx 1070 g1 gaming. +150 core, -500 memory 100% tdp 164 MHASH

Code:

Stats] 145.388 MH/s | Blks/24h 0.000 | A=0 R=0 | Diff=3896.9174 | 00:00:02:27

Massive 20 MH/s increase, much profit!

Make sure that extra hash is received pool side too....

[garytheasshole]

Nexus #10 sendt to the donators. This version has pool support as well.

gtx 1070 g1 gaming. +150 core, -500 memory 100% tdp 164 MHASH

Code:

Stats] 145.388 MH/s | Blks/24h 0.000 | A=0 R=0 | Diff=3896.9174 | 00:00:02:27

Massive 20 MH/s increase, much profit!

Make sure that extra hash is received pool side too....

I'd rather just buy another GPU than "donate"

[nostrakhan]

Nexus #10 sendt to the donators. This version has pool support as well.

gtx 1070 g1 gaming. +150 core, -500 memory 100% tdp 164 MHASH

Code:

Stats] 145.388 MH/s | Blks/24h 0.000 | A=0 R=0 | Diff=3896.9174 | 00:00:02:27

Massive 20 MH/s increase, much profit!

Make sure that extra hash is received pool side too....

I'd rather just buy another GPU than "donate"

dunno what you're saying as it sounds like you "donated" for sp's mod.. but I'm saying I believe poolside the hash rate is not higher, and in fact it is lower with sp's version in comparison to the official pool nexus miner.  So it seems like the sp nexus miner speeds are faked or significant shares not getting sent/accepted.

[garytheasshole]

dunno what you're saying as it sounds like you "donated" for sp's mod.. but I'm saying I believe poolside the hash rate is not higher, and in fact it is lower with sp's version in comparison to the official pool nexus miner.  So it seems like the sp nexus miner speeds are faked or significant shares not getting sent/accepted.

I don't have sp's mod to test, was comparing it with the open source solo miner.

[nostrakhan]

dunno what you're saying as it sounds like you "donated" for sp's mod.. but I'm saying I believe poolside the hash rate is not higher, and in fact it is lower with sp's version in comparison to the official pool nexus miner.  So it seems like the sp nexus miner speeds are faked or significant shares not getting sent/accepted.

I don't have sp's mod to test, was comparing it with the open source solo miner.

Are you comparing it to the miner made by nexus community member "nobody"?  Or which open source miner specifically?

nobody's skminer v1.1 source code is found here:  https://files.slack.com/files-pri/T1WRQ7GBH-F7D1JQTJS/download/nobody_gpuminerv1.1.rar (in precompiled folder is the compiled version of the miner).

At nexuspool.ru there is a faster version of his miner which works only at that pool though.

[garytheasshole]

dunno what you're saying as it sounds like you "donated" for sp's mod.. but I'm saying I believe poolside the hash rate is not higher, and in fact it is lower with sp's version in comparison to the official pool nexus miner.  So it seems like the sp nexus miner speeds are faked or significant shares not getting sent/accepted.

I don't have sp's mod to test, was comparing it with the open source solo miner.

Are you comparing it to the miner made by nexus community member "nobody"?  Or which open source miner specifically?

nobody's skminer v1.1 source code is found here:  https://files.slack.com/files-pri/T1WRQ7GBH-F7D1JQTJS/download/nobody_gpuminerv1.1.rar (in precompiled folder is the compiled version of the miner).

At nexuspool.ru there is a faster version of his miner which works only at that pool though.

https://github.com/djm34/skminer

[Kompik]

dunno what you're saying as it sounds like you "donated" for sp's mod.. but I'm saying I believe poolside the hash rate is not higher, and in fact it is lower with sp's version in comparison to the official pool nexus miner.  So it seems like the sp nexus miner speeds are faked or significant shares not getting sent/accepted.

I don't have sp's mod to test, was comparing it with the open source solo miner.

The newest nobodys version? Because the difference between speeds is almost negligible.

[sp_]

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/nexus/#charts

Nexus chart


The solominer works pretty good. Nexus has been harvested the last month by my mod. You can check the date on the exe.. Pool doesn't work? Bitcointalk.org  is full of currupt pools. Solomine to avoid fluctation.

[nostrakhan]

dunno what you're saying as it sounds like you "donated" for sp's mod.. but I'm saying I believe poolside the hash rate is not higher, and in fact it is lower with sp's version in comparison to the official pool nexus miner.  So it seems like the sp nexus miner speeds are faked or significant shares not getting sent/accepted.

I don't have sp's mod to test, was comparing it with the open source solo miner.

The newest nobodys version? Because the difference between speeds is almost negligible.

Yep nobody's version is newest and best free miner

[nostrakhan]

The solominer works pretty good. Nexus has been harvested the last month by my mod. You can check the date on the exe.. Pool doesn't work? Bitcointalk.org  is full of currupt pools. Solomine to avoid fluctation.

Pool works good with the miner that is provided on the pool page.  The speeds match with what the miner shows.  The pool isn't a corrupt pool, but made by regularly involved contributing nexus community members.

The date on your .exe does it match up similarly to when "nobody" released his?  hmm I wonder 

[PVmining]

The solominer works pretty good. Nexus has been harvested the last month by my mod. You can check the date on the exe.. Pool doesn't work? Bitcointalk.org  is full of currupt pools. Solomine to avoid fluctation.

Pool works good with the miner that is provided on the pool page.  The speeds match with what the miner shows.  The pool isn't a corrupt pool, but made by regularly involved contributing nexus community members.

The date on your .exe does it match up similarly to when "nobody" released his?  hmm I wonder 

...you wonder?
we all know s_pee is highly talented... in copy and paste.
nobodys miner is fast, stable - and free to use!

[sp_]

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/nexus/#charts

Nexus chart


The solominer works pretty good. Nexus has been harvested the last month by my mod. You can check the date on the exe.. Pool doesn't work? Bitcointalk.org  is full of currupt pools. Solomine to avoid fluctation.

Coins are being harvested and dumped. Check the prime channel. Only 1 miner.

[nostrakhan]

The solominer works pretty good. Nexus has been harvested the last month by my mod. You can check the date on the exe.. Pool doesn't work? Bitcointalk.org  is full of currupt pools. Solomine to avoid fluctation.

Pool works good with the miner that is provided on the pool page.  The speeds match with what the miner shows.  The pool isn't a corrupt pool, but made by regularly involved contributing nexus community members.

The date on your .exe does it match up similarly to when "nobody" released his?  hmm I wonder 

...you wonder?
we all know s_pee is highly talented... in copy and paste.
nobodys miner is fast, stable - and free to use!

It's a shame that he still touts his version which is not an improvement to the free version(s) available.  I purchased his mod a long time ago before I found majoh's free version, which was best back then.

SP please have some integrity and don't tout your nexus mod until you have actually made an improvement.

It would be interesting to see a poll showing which customers are happy that they "donated" for a sp mod.

[garytheasshole]

LOL, integrity, if he had integrity he wouldn't be violating GPL.

[sp_]

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/nexus/#charts

Nexus chart


The solominer works pretty good. Nexus has been harvested the last month by my mod. You can check the date on the exe.. Pool doesn't work? Bitcointalk.org  is full of currupt pools. Solomine to avoid fluctation.

Coins are being harvested and dumped. Check the prime channel. Only 1 miner.

The nexus team stole my work, put it out on slack for free. So I decided to make the sp-mod prime harvester private.


The shitcoin has fallen from $3 to $1.30. The GPU and prime channel has fallen. The POS channel is dumping to keep their investment...

[GreenFingers]

Yup, that is correct, pdogg from nexus paid for the nexus sp mod and shared it to everyone in the nexus slack. 

Would love to see a screen shot of the sp prime channel harvester in action?  That would really shut the doubters up.

[nostrakhan]

Yup, that is correct, pdogg from nexus paid for the nexus sp mod and shared it to everyone in the nexus slack. 

Would love to see a screen shot of the sp prime channel harvester in action?  That would really shut the doubters up.

Yeah let's see it lol 

[jimmykl]

It is cute how you slap random things together. That phrase refers to repetition and eventually being right, Gary hasn't displayed any of that. You also literally just rewrote what I just said about Gary .

And yes, you just use people to try and forward your position. You make it seem like there are two options there, either supporting Gary or disagreeing him. A falso dichotomy. You could've simply said nothing, but instead you chose to use someone you don't even agree with to try and stick it to someone else in order to make your own position look stronger.

Original indeed.

Why are you so obsessed with me?

You can't be seriously that stupid where you responded to a post that wasn't even about you? lol... Has to be trolling, there is no other way.

You can't be seriously that stupid to say your post wasn't about me yet you mentioned my name 3 times? Once OK, it's cool, twice you got me ticklish, but thrice, thrice I get summoned!

Who was I responding to dude? You're trying really hard to wriggle out of this when you simply glanced over the post you thought it was a response to you because you saw your name, when it wasn't. The post wasn't about you, it was about another person using you and talking to them.

Surface processing verse reader comprehension. I know it's tough, but it completely fits your MO, just like all your other posts where you assume because someone talks out their ass you think they're a developer. You don't spend any time actually reading and just come up with the first knee jerk response you can, typical of kids today. Now you're just trying to save face, which isn't working because we both know the post wasn't about you.

Keccak and skein (and blake) are good for FPGA, don't be surprised if the profit for GPU drops quickly.
A good FPGA programmer can do the miner in some days. It will be 5 time more efficient than GPU, or more.

could you give us some links to Support that Claim?
last time i read about fpga there werent even worth considering, would have more luck with usb stick ascis

I do chip design for them personally. Consider his statement verified.

Would said FPGAs be a commercial venture or just for in-house use?

He occasionally produces code, but there is no commercial venture because either it's too buggy to do or he doesn't actually have a working program. If he did, he would have warehouses full of them, but he doesn't, so he can't. It's just like Chryo talking about how he's going to conquer the universe, but he still has to stop back in here to remind us of his existence, much like Wolf0.

Actions speak louder then words. Everyone, especially online, likes to beat their chest to make what they do seem bigger then it really is.

As far as what Pallas said, some algorithms are easier to paralyze (parallel?) and fit better inside small footprints (that also depends on the kind of FPGA). Also notice where Wolf0 just said "Believe me I'm a developer" and Pallas actually attempted to talk about it a bit. You can't inherit credibility either.

Also chip design (designing ASICs from the ground up) != programming a FPGA.

Also segued the actual question.

Please, bensam - you have done neither, and you know nothing of the subject. While chip design targeting ASIC often has different constraints and techniques that you keep in mind, a hardware design is quite possible to do which will work on both... although, again, you'd change certain things depending on your target if you were going for maximum efficiency.

I not only have done quite a few designs myself, but was hired by the Sia team to consult on their ASIC's chip design - which I was actually quite beneficial to, as I worked with the team at Custom Silicon Solutions. You, on the other paw, wouldn't be able to figure out how to do (for example) a 32-bit addition using only gates - do yourself a favor, and for once in your life, just stop pretending you know what you're on about. You can still have a little bit of dignity.

Man that got turned right around. Not helped by the fact I ignore bensam.

The commercial venture question was a) partially wondering if there would be more dedicated mining hardware like Sia's Obelisk (if it's still called that) coming up and b) fishing to see what you had been working on – which was Sia's Obelisk so that's interesting. Ta.

[sp_]

The nexus pool miner is still in beta, but I get correct results poolside.



After 50 accepts only 1 reject. (2%) And the pool value is still higher than the miner window output