Epsylon3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
November 23, 2014, 11:13:43 AM |
|
The 650 is doing pretty bad. 727KHASH@x11. The merged simd code (compress1/compress2) into one kernal, reduced the performance by 10KHASH. (1.3%) But Cudaarch is not possible to check in host code.
In fact it is check fugue : int intensity = (device_sm[device_map[thr_id]] > 500) ? 22 : 19;
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
November 23, 2014, 02:20:01 PM |
|
Thanks. Checked in a fix for 650 now.
I also managed to make x11 and x13 25KHASH faster by moving the final test into the (echo and fugue) kernal. @github.
Will prepare an exe for test. Build 9.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
November 23, 2014, 03:32:03 PM Last edit: November 23, 2014, 03:56:14 PM by sp_ |
|
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
November 23, 2014, 07:19:12 PM |
|
I've made a pull request on github.
The Hashrate didn't increase after your commit, but the power consumption is down. Memory controller load is now 14-15% and power 65-100%. I have also removed /merged some kernals, so this can also be the reason. Memory load in the previous release on 980 was above 20%. release8 had 28% load@9.3 MHASH
|
|
|
|
Epsylon3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
November 23, 2014, 07:32:58 PM |
|
nice work, that give me a lot of things to check for 3.0 simd, check my latest commit...
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
November 23, 2014, 07:52:25 PM |
|
The simd fix for 3.0/3.5 is nice. I only fixed x11 in my fork, so yours is bether. When comparing, you should also check the Wattage. Some changes does not improve hashrate, but they do reduce power.
|
|
|
|
Epsylon3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
November 23, 2014, 08:10:37 PM |
|
yes, i need to double check the commit, i lost 1ms, edit: ok fixed
|
|
|
|
ryen123
|
|
November 23, 2014, 10:13:54 PM Last edit: November 24, 2014, 06:37:19 AM by ryen123 |
|
@sp_ I'm mining at yaamp.com and release 9 doesn't seem to connect very well to the mining pool. No problems with release 8. Edit: CCminer(release9) sends 1 share then doesn't do anything else after. However gpu is at 99% load. Same for every algo. It does work for nicehash/westhash and p2pool.
|
|
|
|
jjjordan
|
|
November 23, 2014, 10:26:01 PM |
|
@sp_ I'm mining at yaamp.com and release 9 doesn't seem to connect very well to the mining pool. No problems with release 8.
Same here. GTX 970, tried both exe files different pools (X11,13,15) it's a hit and miss. At least I couldn't find any dependency on when it connects and when it doesn't.
|
|
|
|
go6ooo1212
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
|
|
November 23, 2014, 10:30:08 PM |
|
@sp_ I'm mining at yaamp.com and release 9 doesn't seem to connect very well to the mining pool. No problems with release 8.
Same here. GTX 970, tried both exe files different pools (X11,13,15) it's a hit and miss. At least I couldn't find any dependency on when it connects and when it doesn't. +1 same thing , lots of connection interupts...
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
November 23, 2014, 10:38:00 PM |
|
Mine on a pool without extranounce support. F.ex wafflepool. What rates are you getting on benchmark mode?
|
|
|
|
Epsylon3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
November 24, 2014, 04:08:28 AM |
|
i made a fix for yaamp today... but todays disconnections are not related to the code. yaamp doesnt use extranonce, only nicehash and westhash
|
|
|
|
jjjordan
|
|
November 24, 2014, 04:31:28 AM |
|
Mine on a pool without extranounce support. F.ex wafflepool. What rates are you getting on benchmark mode?
benchmark (970) is: X11 - 7.3 X13 - 5.4 X15 - 4.7
|
|
|
|
|
ryen123
|
|
November 24, 2014, 06:52:26 AM |
|
@sp_
ccminer-1-5-git-fork-by-tpruvot-with-extra-nonce-support from the blog Benchmark X11: ~2955 kH/s X13: ~2237 kH/s X15: ~1950 kH/s
No disconnect issues or problems mining at yaamp.com
Release 9 Benchmark X11: ~3003kH/s X13: ~2265kH/s X15: ~1920kH/s
Ok with nicehash/westhash & p2pool. Problem with yaamp.com
Win7x64. Nvidia driver 344.75. GTX 750Ti. GPU Clock: 1210 MHz / Memory Clock: 1600 MHz
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
November 24, 2014, 07:24:47 AM |
|
benchmark (970) is: X11 - 7.3 X13 - 5.4 X15 - 4.7
Is this with standard clocks? I think the release 8 did 6,7 MHASH@x11 on stock clocks(970) does it meen a 600KHASH Boost? jpouza, are you there? Please post the 980 OC results
|
|
|
|
jpouza
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1119
|
|
November 24, 2014, 07:32:11 AM |
|
benchmark (970) is: X11 - 7.3 X13 - 5.4 X15 - 4.7
Is this with standard clocks? I think the release 8 did 6,7 MHASH@x11 on stock clocks(970) does it meen a 600KHASH Boost? jpouza, are you there? Please post the 980 OC results Hi sp_! Here are the results with maximum overclock, about 9,5-9,7MH/s, some disconnects happening as mentioned by the guys before: subir fotosEDIT: And keep going, nice so far , pool reporting proper hash, everything OK. subir imagenesCheers
|
|
|
|
jjjordan
|
|
November 24, 2014, 07:48:36 AM |
|
benchmark (970) is: X11 - 7.3 X13 - 5.4 X15 - 4.7
Is this with standard clocks? I think the release 8 did 6,7 MHASH@x11 on stock clocks(970) does it meen a 600KHASH Boost? jpouza, are you there? Please post the 980 OC results It is for EVGA SC GTX 970 ACX v.2 http://www.evga.com/Products/Product.aspx?pn=04G-P4-2974-KRNon-overclocked, but its stock clocks are a little higher. Will test tomorrow with yaamp and nice/westhash when rig rental is over.
|
|
|
|
SS2006
|
|
November 24, 2014, 07:49:11 AM |
|
sp did you optimize x11 in release 9 I've jumped to 7700 khash now (with 200 MHZ OC) on gtx970
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
November 24, 2014, 07:50:41 AM |
|
jpouza: From the picture I see that you get a couple of does not validate on the cpu. Did you clock it too high? 9600 KHASH is i monster hashrate btw Need to check the "does not validate" , seams to work fine on the 750ti. This might be a problem with the ccminer52.exe file. Is the ccminer.exe performing the same as the 52 version?
|
|
|
|
|