CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[bathrobehero]

I'm running a script that cycles through different algos on YAAMP so that in theory the pool gets me to mine the most profitable using  "-p x11,x13,x14,x15,quark,lyra2"

Does that actually grant you higher payouts at the end of the day? I'd imagine constant switching is just lagging behind what was profitable. And the more people use a script like it the worse it gets.

Edit: CPU validation errors are still there with v4.

<--- look at my stats, I'm a newbie. This is the 1st day. I will try single algos and see what difference I get, my wallet is not synced yet. I'd assume that the pool calculates what profitable and switches you to it. At the moment its X14 (alipaycoin) and quark (a mixture) no idea they really are the best, though I see many more people are on X11, going to try a few different things over the next few days and see what happens.

Sorry, welcome and good luck! Feel free to pm me if you need help.

[1714670451]

1714670451

[1714670451]

1714670451

[1714670451]

1714670451

[hefty]

hi, can anyone help me with crashing driver only with 970 gtx gpus while mining with ccminer all realases,  tried all 3 different drivers on win 8.1 gpus are not overclocked and temps are great, they are working fine while stress testing or gaming. 5xx and 6xx and 7xx series working fine with tsiv/tpruvot older miners and 770gtx works fine with sp releases only 970 gtx are crashing randomly sometimes 4 times in one hour and sometimes once in a 4 hour etc, is that normal, i tried reinstalling everything milion times but have no luck pls help  

i am mining mjollnir and i tried all releases from 1.5.1 upwards to sp 32  

[jadefalke]

what are the typical hashing speeds for the Spreadcoin Algo for 750, 960, 970 and 980?

[jpouza]

what are the typical hashing speeds for the Spreadcoin Algo for 750, 960, 970 and 980?

Considering all cards slightly overclocked with tsiv´s 0.1r2 miner:

750Ti: 1,7MH/s
960GTX: never tested, I believe it´s about 2x750Ti = 3,0-3,4MH/s
970GTX: 4,0MH/s
980GTX: 5,3 MH/s

Cheers

[frazier34567]

Are any of you guys running the new miner on Windows 8.1?

Yes.

I get this error when I try to run it:

0xc000007b

Did you ever encounter anything as such?

Need Cudart32_65.dll file in that folder or installing cuda 6.5 sdk on your system.

Thanks for the response.

Yea I have that in the same folder, when I run tsiv's miner, it runs fine, but with sp's, I get this error.

This is all the dll I have in that folder
cudart32_65.dll
msvcr120.dll
pthreadVC2.dll

Maybe it is another one of them??? Just guessing

[jadefalke]

what are the typical hashing speeds for the Spreadcoin Algo for 750, 960, 970 and 980?

Considering all cards slightly overclocked with tsiv´s 0.1r2 miner:

750Ti: 1,7MH/s
960GTX: never tested, I believe it´s about 2x750Ti = 3,0-3,4MH/s
970GTX: 4,0MH/s
980GTX: 5,3 MH/s

Cheers

Thanks for that!

[jpouza]

sp_, release 4 still broken, hash problems.

[frazier34567]

-X factor on 750 ti test from 1 to 25 (26 is out of memory)

My Rig

6 EVGA 750 Ti SC cards -No overclock -no memory overclock -no bios mod -no extra power plug
Windows 8.1 Pro
Nvidia 347.25 Driver
Spreadminer4

I did a comparison of -x 1 to 25 for about 2 minutes and looked at the high and low and eyeball average (No measurement taken)
Got me down to testing 6 settings
Base (No -x) 1738
-x 5  1739
-x 10 1732
-x 15 1737
-x 20 1742
-x 21 1739

Did a timed test of 2 minutes (Throwing out the start up hash rates, first 6 readings at sub 1600 Kh/s speeds). Used Excel to get average numbers below.
Base (No -x) 1730
-x 5  1731
-x 10 1737
-x 15 1739
-x 20 1738
-x 21 1730

So I removed -x21 because why push the card that hard if it does not give good results.

I did a 5 minute test then, again throwing out the startup hashes below 1600 Kh/s. (See if heat slowdown would be an issue.) Used Excel to get average numbers below.
Base (No -x) 1726.54
-x 5  1728.48
-x 10 1732.68
-x 15 1737.46
-x 20 1736.99

So the winner for my Rig is -x 15

Here is all of the results from first test. It surprised me how well -x 5 did

        Min   Max   Eyeball Avg
Base   1697   1750   1738
-x 1   1380   1470   1450
-x 2   1504   1576   1553
-x 3   1549   1595   1572
-x 4   1549   1593   1578
-x 5   1699   1755   1739
-x 6   1671   1718   1692
-x 7   1545   1602   1586
-x 8   1702   1750   1724
-x 9   1629   1691   1668
-x 10   1689   1755   1732
-x 11   1680   1737   1710
-x 12   1678   1735   1707
-x 13   1673   1722   1700
-x 14   1577   1709   1684
-x 15   1705   1755   1737
-x 16   1690   1745   1720
-x 17   1687   1733   1720
-x 18   1681   1731   1702
-x 19   1676   1722   1716
-x 20   1707   1761   1742
-x 21   1699   1750   1739
-x 22   1694   1749   1726
-x 23   1692   1743   1721
-x 24   1241   1727   1589
-x 25   650   1758   1400
-x 26 Out of Memory Crash

[sp_]

sp_, release 4 still broken, hash problems.

Try to run it  for a while in benchmark mode( -benchmark). Do you get any "does not validate on the cpu?"

[sp_]

what are the typical hashing speeds for the Spreadcoin Algo for 750, 960, 970 and 980?

Considering all cards slightly overclocked with tsiv´s 0.1r2 miner:
750Ti: 1,7MH/s
960GTX: never tested, I believe it´s about 2x750Ti = 3,0-3,4MH/s
970GTX: 4,0MH/s
980GTX: 5,3 MH/s
Cheers

Release 4 is around 2640 khash on a reference 960. Standard clocked.

[sp_]

I did a comparison of -x 1 to 25 for about 2 minutes and looked at the high and low and eyeball average (No measurement taken)
Got me down to testing 6 settings
Base (No -x) 1738
-x 5  1739
-x 10 1732
-x 15 1737
-x 20 1742
-x 21 1739

Tnx for testing. 750ti cards do good with multiple of 5. 980 and 960 with multiple of 8 And 970 with multiple of 13.

Default in release 4 is :

750ti: 5
970: 13
980/960: 16

[sp_]

#3:

edited

Thanks for testing.
Seems to be an error in the test for this nounce value 0xffffffff. I think i need to change the test. This will not reduce the speed of the miner.

The miner should find blocks now, but if you get invalid nounces except 0xffffffff then the hashspeed is broken.

[frazier34567]

Yes I get the FFFFFFF one when I was doing my tests.  I assumed because of all the FFFFFF each time it was not a valid solution.

(Sorry if my FFFFFFF are not the right number of F.)

[AliMan]

Are any of you guys running the new miner on Windows 8.1?

Yes.

I get this error when I try to run it:

0xc000007b

Did you ever encounter anything as such?

Need Cudart32_65.dll file in that folder or installing cuda 6.5 sdk on your system.

Thanks for the response.

Yea I have that in the same folder, when I run tsiv's miner, it runs fine, but with sp's, I get this error.

This is all the dll I have in that folder
cudart32_65.dll
msvcr120.dll
pthreadVC2.dll

Maybe it is another one of them??? Just guessing

That was it buddy, I was missing the msvcr120.dll

Thanks man!

Edit: Dam, it ran at first, but now it's saying not recognized as an external internal command.

[jpouza]

sp_, release 4 still broken, hash problems.

Try to run it  for a while in benchmark mode( -benchmark). Do you get any "does not validate on the cpu?"

When running/mining normal it gets a lot of this message...zero blocks..

[jjjordan]

Yes I get the FFFFFFF one when I was doing my tests.  I assumed because of all the FFFFFF each time it was not a valid solution.

(Sorry if my FFFFFFF are not the right number of F.)

With v.4 I don't get the strings with the zeros but only
the FFFFF... message every now and then...

Code:

found a solution, nonce #FFFFFFFF
result for nonce #FFFFFFFF does not validate on CPU!

(that is not copy/paste - I typed it )

[frazier34567]

Yes I get the FFFFFFF one when I was doing my tests.  I assumed because of all the FFFFFF each time it was not a valid solution.

(Sorry if my FFFFFFF are not the right number of F.)

With v.4 I don't get the strings with the zeros but only
the FFFFF... message every now and then...

Code:

found a solution, nonce #FFFFFFFF
result for nonce #FFFFFFFF does not validate on CPU!

(that is not copy/paste - I typed it )

Since I finished my testing yesterday on my 7x750 ti cards I have mined 4 blocks, with SpreadminerV4 at -x 15.

Averaging 1736.42 Kh/s over the past 2:20:48.

[sp_]

I will test some more this weekend on 960,970,980 cards. Then I will add some parallization and reach 2 MHASH on the 750ti.

My private x11 miner is now peaking at 13 MHASH on the 980.

[Dotcommie]

Yes I get the FFFFFFF one when I was doing my tests.  I assumed because of all the FFFFFF each time it was not a valid solution.

(Sorry if my FFFFFFF are not the right number of F.)

With v.4 I don't get the strings with the zeros but only
the FFFFF... message every now and then...

Code:

found a solution, nonce #FFFFFFFF
result for nonce #FFFFFFFF does not validate on CPU!

(that is not copy/paste - I typed it )

Yeah I got a lot of those as well but it appears to at least be working now since I saw a few yays in between all that.  Previous builds I don't think I got more than 1 or 2 valid.

[jpouza]

I will test some more this weekend on 960,970,980 cards. Then I will add some parallization and reach 2 MHASH on the 750ti.

My private x11 miner is now peaking at 13 MHASH on the 980.

sp_, what about spreadx11 miner release 5, when it will be released?

Release 4 isn´t working with my 980s and 970 cards (broken hash - does not validate on CPU).

Cheers