farfiman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1449
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 24, 2012, 04:41:04 AM |
|
Another question. Does anyone know now many BTC denominated loans that were made slightly more than one year ago below 1$ have not been defaulted on (or restructured to be USD denominated)? Care to guess? 100%? 50%? 10% maybe.
What will happen with all these loan portfolios if (when actually) BTC exchange rate jumps 40-50% in one month?
The only thing that would affect my profits would be a huge spike in price over a very short period of time.
Any idea when this spike will happen ?
|
"We are just fools. We insanely believe that we can replace one politician with another and something will really change. The ONLY possible way to achieve change is to change the very system of how government functions. Until we are prepared to do that, suck it up for your future belongs to the madness and corruption of politicians." Martin Armstrong
|
|
|
JusticeForYou
VIP
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 490
Merit: 271
|
|
May 24, 2012, 04:49:15 AM |
|
So, you think that’s what Pirate is doing? I dunno what Pirate is doing. I have formed my opinion from a question I asked in public a long time ago, knowing what I know about markets and his overall idea. Basically, I have formed my own opinion and believe I know exactly what he is doing. Here is my problem: If you figure out a correlation, you don't tell anybody otherwise it doesn't work anymore. Or if it does, it does so less profitably. I propose 'what ifs' that are not negative or nefarious in nature where others simply go to the negative. Sometimes, if it walks like a Duck, quacks like a Duck, it's a Goose. I try to defend those that are getting attacked without evidence. Lynch Mobs run rampant around here. Sometimes it turns out they were right so people use that to squash others. Why is Pirate being attacked? Because he is making an impact on the market and the way it operates and people can't figure out how it is being done. They are not attacking the HYIP guy that stopped paying people because he didn't affect the market in a big way so they don't care. Vlad brought up Occam's Razor which most take to mean: "other things being equal, a simpler explanation is better than a more complex one." not only is this incorrect it definitely wouldn't apply to finance if it was correct. Imagine apply it to CDS', etc... In practice, the application of the principle often shifts the burden of proof in a discussion.[1] The razor asserts that one should proceed to simpler theories until simplicity can be traded for greater explanatory power. The simplest available theory need not be most accurate. Philosophers point out also that the exact meaning of simplest may be nuanced. ~wikipedia BTW: IF I was to set up a business model, I would design it so 'others' would come to false conclusions by utilizing reliance on the above in order to protect the model and market share.
|
|
|
|
. ..1xBit.com Super Six.. | ▄█████████████▄ ████████████▀▀▀ █████████████▄ █████████▌▀████ ██████████ ▀██ ██████████▌ ▀ ████████████▄▄ ███████████████ ███████████████ ███████████████ ███████████████ ███████████████ ▀██████████████ | ███████████████ █████████████▀ █████▀▀ ███▀ ▄███ ▄ ██▄▄████▌ ▄█ ████████ ████████▌ █████████ ▐█ ██████████ ▐█ ███████▀▀ ▄██ ███▀ ▄▄▄█████ ███ ▄██████████ ███████████████ | ███████████████ ███████████████ ███████████████ ███████████████ ███████████████ ███████████▀▀▀█ ██████████ ███████████▄▄▄█ ███████████████ ███████████████ ███████████████ ███████████████ ███████████████ | ▄█████ ▄██████ ▄███████ ▄████████ ▄█████████ ▄██████████ ▄███████████ ▄████████████ ▄█████████████ ▄██████████████ ▀▀███████████ ▀▀███████ ▀▀██▀ | ▄▄██▌ ▄▄███████ █████████▀ ▄██▄▄▀▀██▀▀ ▄██████ ▄▄▄ ███████ ▄█▄ ▄ ▀██████ █ ▀█ ▀▀▀ ▄ ▀▄▄█▀ ▄▄█████▄ ▀▀▀ ▀████████ ▀█████▀ ████ ▀▀▀ █████ █████ | ▄ █▄▄ █ ▄ ▀▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▀ ▄▄█████▄█▄▄ ▄ ▄███▀ ▀▀ ▀▀▄ ▄██▄███▄ ▀▀▀▀▄ ▄▄ ▄████████▄▄▄▄▄█▄▄▄██ ████████████▀▀ █ ▐█ ██████████████▄ ▄▄▀██▄██ ▐██████████████ ▄███ ████▀████████████▄███▀ ▀█▀ ▐█████████████▀ ▐████████████▀ ▀█████▀▀▀ █▀ | . Premier League LaLiga Serie A | . Bundesliga Ligue 1 Primeira Liga | | . ..TAKE PART.. |
|
|
|
PatrickHarnett
|
|
May 24, 2012, 04:53:36 AM |
|
I'll go back to my nice stable financing business (where I'm charging 280% per year and have good customers and low default risk).
OK you have convinced me. Will launch FF+tor and set's up a proper anonymous identity (or use a previously prepared one), will borrow at 280% per year (or more) and will invest into MMM at 50%-60% per month. Looking forward to paying up interest up until the death of MMM, let us all pray it will last a few more years. But biz model is very sound. Once MMM fails will set up a new identity or ten and invest into MMM III. Rinse and repeat. Disclaimer: no I am not going to do that, just kidding. But others will, I bet. That special low rate involved escrowed equipment with high resale value - if you want me to fund your purchase, I'll have it held until fully paid off - and yes, that's 2%/week. If you default, I resell it for full price.
|
|
|
|
PatrickHarnett
|
|
May 24, 2012, 04:57:53 AM |
|
Another question. Does anyone know now many BTC denominated loans that were made slightly more than one year ago below 1$ have not been defaulted on (or restructured to be USD denominated)? Care to guess? 100%? 50%? 10% maybe.
What will happen with all these loan portfolios if (when actually) BTC exchange rate jumps 40-50% in one month?
I can answer that one too: I don't care. I transact in bitcoins independent of other currencies. I gave up worrying about price movements long ago, because 10%/day wasn't high enough for me to worry about. (I used to trade electricity on my own account as a commodity and have yet to find anything as volatile.) I have done some large loans and seen the price increase/fall 50% - I tended not to notice.
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
May 24, 2012, 05:05:26 AM |
|
Vlad brought up Occam's Razor which most take to mean: "other things being equal, a simpler explanation is better than a more complex one."
I think the most likely and simplest explanation, given pirate's know proclivities, is that he has a time machine, goes back in time to the 18th Century and captains a privateer. He needs investor money not just to to enable the purchase and maintenance of the privateer and the hideous expense of time travel, but also when he and his crew face life and death every day he'll want to have been prepared as much as possible, using as much money as he could. However, he can afford to repay at such a high interest rate because he can attack the same Spanish Galleons again and again, and sell the same gold over and over. Such is the beauty of time travel. I think others have brought up similar reasons for the necessity of investors when the profits are so large; I think mine is the simplest and most realistic by far.
|
|
|
|
jgarzik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1100
|
|
May 24, 2012, 05:09:06 AM |
|
Well when I have done loans on the forum. The only 'collateral' I used was 'Trust' specifically using the WoT. I offered a rate on the forum far below what others charge. 1-3%/mo.
If you don't pay back the loan, nothing happens to you from my stand point. But this is what happens because you didn't, you will have trouble getting other loans and other people borrowing rates will increase to counteract your bad debt.
ObPlug: http://bitcoin-otc.com/
|
Jeff Garzik, Bloq CEO, former bitcoin core dev team; opinions are my own. Visit bloq.com / metronome.io Donations / tip jar: 1BrufViLKnSWtuWGkryPsKsxonV2NQ7Tcj
|
|
|
drakahn
|
|
May 24, 2012, 05:10:05 AM |
|
lol, someone in a time machine going somewhere else than 2009 with future mining technology and constantly keeping just under most users radar (zomg, mysteryminer is a time travelling pirate manipulator?)
|
14ga8dJ6NGpiwQkNTXg7KzwozasfaXNfEU
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
May 24, 2012, 05:41:27 AM |
|
lol, someone in a time machine going somewhere else than 2009 with future mining technology and constantly keeping just under most users radar (zomg, mysteryminer is a time travelling pirate manipulator?)
Well, I agree that that would be logical, but not if you're "a pirate 200 years late". In 2009, opprtunities to make people walk the plank and say things like "Argh! Ye lubber etc" were severely limited.
|
|
|
|
John (John K.)
Global Troll-buster and
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1227
Away on an extended break
|
|
May 24, 2012, 05:57:44 AM |
|
If I don’t pay back btc loans what happens?
teflone will visit your house. That's enough to make me pay back the loan. Add Randy Folds and I'll double the interest I return. And with his sister added, you'll be begging for them to take your money.
|
|
|
|
drakahn
|
|
May 24, 2012, 06:08:00 AM |
|
lol, someone in a time machine going somewhere else than 2009 with future mining technology and constantly keeping just under most users radar (zomg, mysteryminer is a time travelling pirate manipulator?)
Well, I agree that that would be logical, but not if you're "a pirate 200 years late". In 2009, opprtunities to make people walk the plank and say things like "Argh! Ye lubber etc" were severely limited. I guess "somewhere else than 2009" did seem a bit exclusive, but not really what i meant, just that the bitcoin profits wouldn't come from piracy, chances are he's running the same program with pirate booty, the original guy fawkes was him in a v for vendetta mask(just to claim 'first') and he was there the night satoshi drowned
|
14ga8dJ6NGpiwQkNTXg7KzwozasfaXNfEU
|
|
|
P4man
|
|
May 24, 2012, 06:28:43 AM |
|
Regular bitcoin interest rates in the lending sub forums are 10-15% a MONTH. This is because of bitcoins unknown future.
Id say its primarily because of the huge risk for the borrower to get scammed and never see his coins back.
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
May 24, 2012, 06:32:37 AM |
|
lol, someone in a time machine going somewhere else than 2009 with future mining technology and constantly keeping just under most users radar (zomg, mysteryminer is a time travelling pirate manipulator?)
Well, I agree that that would be logical, but not if you're "a pirate 200 years late". In 2009, opprtunities to make people walk the plank and say things like "Argh! Ye lubber etc" were severely limited. I guess "somewhere else than 2009" did seem a bit exclusive, but not really what i meant, just that the bitcoin profits wouldn't come from piracy, chances are he's running the same program with pirate booty, the original guy fawkes was him in a v for vendetta mask(just to claim 'first') and he was there the night satoshi drowned While we're brainstorming here, drakahn, and still keeping in mind Occam's razor, he could have invested in steam devices with his pirate booty, and developed the first difference engine rather early. From there it's only a matter of years before he introduces coal-coin mining on distributed steam powered difference engines and corners the market on cryptocurrency. Without the ability to reign in his expanding wealth, he soon controls the world. You really want to contribute coins to Pirate's quest for world domination?
|
|
|
|
cunicula
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1003
|
|
May 24, 2012, 06:35:05 AM |
|
Id say its primarily because of the huge risk for the borrower to get scammed and never see his coins back.
Yes, this is correct. If not, everyone who plans to hold coins long-term would be lending them out. Clearly, they are not. A large fraction of loan requests are complete or partial scams (e.g. the borrower gambles and defaults if the bet fails to pay out). Thus the high interest rate.
|
|
|
|
drakahn
|
|
May 24, 2012, 07:24:34 AM |
|
lol, someone in a time machine going somewhere else than 2009 with future mining technology and constantly keeping just under most users radar (zomg, mysteryminer is a time travelling pirate manipulator?)
Well, I agree that that would be logical, but not if you're "a pirate 200 years late". In 2009, opprtunities to make people walk the plank and say things like "Argh! Ye lubber etc" were severely limited. I guess "somewhere else than 2009" did seem a bit exclusive, but not really what i meant, just that the bitcoin profits wouldn't come from piracy, chances are he's running the same program with pirate booty, the original guy fawkes was him in a v for vendetta mask(just to claim 'first') and he was there the night satoshi drowned While we're brainstorming here, drakahn, and still keeping in mind Occam's razor, he could have invested in steam devices with his pirate booty, and developed the first difference engine rather early. From there it's only a matter of years before he introduces coal-coin mining on distributed steam powered difference engines and corners the market on cryptocurrency. Without the ability to reign in his expanding wealth, he soon controls the world. You really want to contribute coins to Pirate's quest for world domination? more than ev'yarrgh
|
14ga8dJ6NGpiwQkNTXg7KzwozasfaXNfEU
|
|
|
Vladimir
|
|
May 24, 2012, 08:02:44 AM |
|
Vlad brought up Occam's Razor which most take to mean: "other things being equal, a simpler explanation is better than a more complex one."
I think the most likely and simplest explanation, given pirate's know proclivities, is that he has a time machine, goes back in time to the 18th Century and captains a privateer. He needs investor money not just to to enable the purchase and maintenance of the privateer and the hideous expense of time travel, but also when he and his crew face life and death every day he'll want to have been prepared as much as possible, using as much money as he could. However, he can afford to repay at such a high interest rate because he can attack the same Spanish Galleons again and again, and sell the same gold over and over. Such is the beauty of time travel. I think others have brought up similar reasons for the necessity of investors when the profits are so large; I think mine is the simplest and most realistic by far. Now this all suddenly makes a lot of sense!
|
-
|
|
|
farfiman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1449
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 24, 2012, 09:01:03 AM |
|
Regular bitcoin interest rates in the lending sub forums are 10-15% a MONTH. This is because of bitcoins unknown future.
Id say its primarily because of the huge risk for the borrower to get scammed and never see his coins back. You mean the lender....
|
"We are just fools. We insanely believe that we can replace one politician with another and something will really change. The ONLY possible way to achieve change is to change the very system of how government functions. Until we are prepared to do that, suck it up for your future belongs to the madness and corruption of politicians." Martin Armstrong
|
|
|
phelix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1020
|
|
May 24, 2012, 10:01:29 AM |
|
I do a little lending, and selling. Most of the last six months I have been making 10% to 15% per month. My borrowers have been willing counter-parties and buyers similarly willing to pay (sometimes) $1/BTC above market rates. Why, because there are other fees/costs that make this affordable.
I must be doing something right because demand has remained strong and my rate of defaults is quite low. I even provide an on-call deposit service, much smaller than Pirate, and paying much lower rates, and you could say my guarantee to repay is worthless too if you wanted.
If you think the interest rates are wrong, I expect you have never lived in a high inflation or volatile economy, and are just very limited in life experience. I still remember the days (in an OECD country) offering 22% deposit rates.
do you see something like a lending bubble, have the rates increased since pirate started his business?
|
|
|
|
phelix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1020
|
|
May 24, 2012, 10:07:43 AM |
|
how to mess with bitcoin if you are say, a bank consortium:
1. amass a large amount of coins (do it cheap by means of a ponzi scheme) 2. get control over a large amount of hashing power (pay more than average pool) 3. screw bitcoin
I am not saying pirate is doing this but I would not know the difference.
|
|
|
|
drakahn
|
|
May 24, 2012, 10:11:00 AM |
|
how to mess with bitcoin if you are say, a bank consortium:
1. amass a large amount of coins (do it cheap by means of a ponzi scheme) 2. get control over a large amount of hashing power (pay more than average pool) 3. screw bitcoin
I am not saying pirate is doing this but I would not know the difference.
the exact opposite could also be true how to massively support bitcoin if you are say, someone who uses bitcoin. 1. amass a large amount of coins because coins rock 2. get control over a large amount of hashing power to protect the network 3. yay bitcoin I am not saying pirate is doing this but I would not know the difference.
|
14ga8dJ6NGpiwQkNTXg7KzwozasfaXNfEU
|
|
|
herzmeister
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1007
|
|
May 24, 2012, 10:35:38 AM |
|
both have in common that it undermines decentralization either way
|
|
|
|
|