|
gerdab
|
 |
April 19, 2017, 01:59:39 PM |
|
waiting for 0,032 to offset my losses in XCurrency  |
|
|
|
|
|
greyskies
|
|
April 19, 2017, 02:01:47 PM |
|
As far as I can tell this is the only coin that does actual trustless atomic trading between separate chains.
I read somewhere Dan did the first trade almost a year ago. Surprising it's taken this long to start getting recognition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
free-bit.co.in
|
|
April 19, 2017, 02:12:58 PM |
|
LTC TESTING HAS BEGUN ON THE BLOCKNET DECENTRLAISED EXCHANGE! Yes, yes and yes!  Awesome news! |
|
|
|
commenter
Member
 Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
April 19, 2017, 02:18:17 PM |
|
That is fun to watch this is pretty cool video I also secured my 5k block to run a node for dx. I have very strong believe in Block that's the future of decentralized cryptocurrency. Awesome ! Vid Love it ! |
|
|
|
|
|
truxton
|
|
April 19, 2017, 02:23:14 PM |
|
As far as I can tell this is the only coin that does actual trustless atomic trading between separate chains.
I read somewhere Dan did the first trade almost a year ago. Surprising it's taken this long to start getting recognition.
That is correct. |
|
|
|
|
|
jujugoboom
|
|
April 19, 2017, 02:23:39 PM |
|
LTC TESTING HAS BEGUN ON THE BLOCKNET DECENTRLAISED EXCHANGE! Yes, yes and yes! Awesome news! Cool, Blocknet will be awesome, you are doing great job even not on poloniex. I am proud of you, guys. |
|
|
|
|
|
truxton
|
|
April 19, 2017, 02:26:48 PM |
|
"Order placed for #LTC on our decentralised exchange. No coding required."
|
|
|
|
|
|
greyskies
|
|
April 19, 2017, 02:37:13 PM |
|
As far as I can tell this is the only coin that does actual trustless atomic trading between separate chains.
I read somewhere Dan did the first trade almost a year ago. Surprising it's taken this long to start getting recognition.
That is correct. It's frustrating then I see all these new projects springing up stealing our thunder when we were the first and not only that other projects aren't truly atomic and trustless like ours. What worries me is they will then steal our atomic trading secret sauce and go even higher in value? Marketing matters a lot with coins not just the tech. However I'm hoping word will spread as the price is slowing adjusting upwards to it's correct market value. |
|
|
|
|
synechist (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
April 19, 2017, 02:42:41 PM |
|
As far as I can tell this is the only coin that does actual trustless atomic trading between separate chains.
I read somewhere Dan did the first trade almost a year ago. Surprising it's taken this long to start getting recognition.
We weren't happy with the implementation. We've effectively built this thing three times, and now the security approach is where we want it to be, and the architectural direction is clear (i.e. how to best function as infrastructure for the token ecosystem). |
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
synechist (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
April 19, 2017, 02:58:31 PM |
|
As far as I can tell this is the only coin that does actual trustless atomic trading between separate chains.
I read somewhere Dan did the first trade almost a year ago. Surprising it's taken this long to start getting recognition.
We weren't happy with the implementation. We've effectively built this thing three times, and now the security approach is where we want it to be, and the architectural direction is clear (i.e. how to best function as infrastructure for the token ecosystem). As for the risk that a new project may steal our thunder, I'm not concerned. We have a solid community, widespread awareness of our first-mover status, a growing user base of cryptocurrencies, and increasing developer interest. Who'd contribute to some random fork when they can contribute to the main branch? That's the appeal of open source software, really. Additionally, we're the ones who've pioneered the token ecosystem and the "inter-chain era" and have led the market by three years. It's not too likely that another team will have grasped the intricacies of supporting this vision and will be able to steer development in a strategic way. But hey, one of the beauties of open source is that anyone is welcome to clone us. My feeling is that attempts of this nature will only lend further credibility to our work and boost our visibility. |
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
dishku
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1003
|
|
April 19, 2017, 03:05:14 PM |
|
In recent situation when testing has very positive result than no doubt it gonna be huge. I am holding my tokens for long term because I think $100m marketcap will achieve very soon. Now turn for Block still chance to make reserve seat for this train and enjoy later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jumanji7
|
|
April 19, 2017, 03:31:27 PM |
|
New all time high $ 1.70 |
|
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
|
April 19, 2017, 03:35:45 PM |
|
As far as I can tell this is the only coin that does actual trustless atomic trading between separate chains.
I read somewhere Dan did the first trade almost a year ago. Surprising it's taken this long to start getting recognition.
We weren't happy with the implementation. We've effectively built this thing three times, and now the security approach is where we want it to be, and the architectural direction is clear (i.e. how to best function as infrastructure for the token ecosystem). As for the risk that a new project may steal our thunder, I'm not concerned. We have a solid community, widespread awareness of our first-mover status, a growing user base of cryptocurrencies, and increasing developer interest. Who'd contribute to some random fork when they can contribute to the main branch? That's the appeal of open source software, really. Additionally, we're the ones who've pioneered the token ecosystem and the "inter-chain era" and have led the market by three years. It's not too likely that another team will have grasped the intricacies of supporting this vision and will be able to steer development in a strategic way. But hey, one of the beauties of open source is that anyone is welcome to clone us. My feeling is that attempts of this nature will only lend further credibility to our work and boost our visibility. Is there no way to obscure or encrypt part of the code and open source after a clear lead is established? I detest copy and pasters. Many successful projects are only opening up all of their source after they have a few generations clear lead now. Shame to work 3 years and someone presses copy and paste straight away? There are obfuscation tools so people can see the source and build from it but it makes it almost impossible to make sense of the code. |
|
|
|
|
Xaltotun
|
|
April 19, 2017, 03:46:10 PM |
|
Lol, at this rate there will be less than 100k available on Bittrex.
|
|
|
|
pinkman12345
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1070
Merit: 1021
|
|
April 19, 2017, 03:51:10 PM |
|
Lol, at this rate there will be less than 100k available on Bittrex.
You know if there is any effort to get BLOCK back on polo for trading? |
|
|
|
|
Zontop
|
|
April 19, 2017, 03:54:55 PM |
|
Block is becoming like hotcake soon those not aware will be searching to get re minimum number to run node. One can easily imagine running node for decentralized exchange will be one of the most and highly profitable in couple of months time. Investing in Block is wise decision what I took.
|
|
|
|
|
|
G-Bert
|
|
April 19, 2017, 03:59:35 PM |
|
As far as I can tell this is the only coin that does actual trustless atomic trading between separate chains.
I read somewhere Dan did the first trade almost a year ago. Surprising it's taken this long to start getting recognition.
We weren't happy with the implementation. We've effectively built this thing three times, and now the security approach is where we want it to be, and the architectural direction is clear (i.e. how to best function as infrastructure for the token ecosystem). As for the risk that a new project may steal our thunder, I'm not concerned. We have a solid community, widespread awareness of our first-mover status, a growing user base of cryptocurrencies, and increasing developer interest. Who'd contribute to some random fork when they can contribute to the main branch? That's the appeal of open source software, really. Additionally, we're the ones who've pioneered the token ecosystem and the "inter-chain era" and have led the market by three years. It's not too likely that another team will have grasped the intricacies of supporting this vision and will be able to steer development in a strategic way. But hey, one of the beauties of open source is that anyone is welcome to clone us. My feeling is that attempts of this nature will only lend further credibility to our work and boost our visibility. Is there no way to obscure or encrypt part of the code and open source after a clear lead is established? I detest copy and pasters. Many successful projects are only opening up all of their source after they have a few generations clear lead now. Shame to work 3 years and someone presses copy and paste straight away? There are obfuscation tools so people can see the source and build from it but it makes it almost impossible to make sense of the code. I kinda agree with this. What is stopping someone with plenty of money stealing the code, making an amazing UI and releasing a user friendly decentralised exchange before us? I mean there would be a bit of outrage at first but people would still start using it anyway because of what it is. |
XChat XJkVnYD4N4oSjNStgbAUD6UyWuBTWuMRgv
public key fuYPYmK4Sj57PkU2NKg1gKW91euMKkstQPeeexUcxnb8
|
|
|
|
reffi
|
|
April 19, 2017, 04:26:23 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypjunkie
|
|
April 19, 2017, 04:39:19 PM |
|
BLOCK was removed from Polo last yr iirc... Don't need Poloniex, recent interest and price rise should confirm that. |
|
|
|
|
dzimbeck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2412
Merit: 1044
|
|
April 19, 2017, 04:47:50 PM |
|
I use obfuscation in my code and it's still "open source" I realize it goes against the standard rules of open source.
But basically just change variable and function names helps.
However the AT itself is no secret many cryptographers know how to do this. It's more the rest of the code as far as decentralized orderbooks, program logic and other things you might wanna prevent cloners from learning.
Then again clones sometimes strengthen the original codebase not only in support but occasional fixes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
