STEALTHMODE
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 329
Merit: 250
No TX Fees #JustRaiBlocks
|
|
November 14, 2014, 08:36:25 PM |
|
Does anyone sees what happened just now? 4 btc plus buy on 2363?
|
|
|
|
Pliznou
Member
Offline
Activity: 101
Merit: 11
|
|
November 14, 2014, 08:39:25 PM |
|
Does anyone sees what happened just now? 4 btc plus buy on 2363?
Again, i was too slow to buy some
|
|
|
|
leigh2k14
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 14, 2014, 09:58:24 PM |
|
I'm trying to install the Stealth wallet for my linux mint box, but I get the following error when I compile, am I missing a dependency?
/home/leigh/Desktop/Stealth-master/src/qt/bitcoingui.h:4: error: QMainWindow: No such file or directory
Thanks.
Maybe your OS use Qt5 as default. Try this: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt4/bin/qmake make Yeah i'm using Qt5, I tried that command but I get command not found? I though it was because i'm using a 32 bit system, but I tried changing the 64 in the command to 32but it still game me the same error. You'll have excuse me i'm not the best when it comes to linux command line.
|
|
|
|
gustopaz
|
|
November 14, 2014, 11:12:30 PM |
|
Did XST begin booming???
yes
|
|
|
|
lawgicc
|
|
November 14, 2014, 11:18:19 PM |
|
whatever happened to this coin - havent followed in a while but vaguely remember that the stealth send video demos looked promising. What happened?
a fudstorm caused by sociopaths from competing coins But don't worry that in next weeks things will return to normal +1000 to that EmilioMann For the new members and the old that are not following stealthcoin.slack i suggest you pm koontas and ask him to invite you. All your questions will be answered very quickly there by Hondo and the dev team and you will find them a lot more interactive than in the bitcointalk thread. +1 although I have yet to use slack. I invest in coins that have solid devs. Keyword Invest. Patience to the ones that only talk about price. No need for constant updates here. Just important updates the community should know about.
|
mrBitcoinZ.com @mrB1tc01n
|
|
|
|
StealthCoin1
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 498
Merit: 252
Life failures Stealthcoin, Ark coin and Safemoon
|
|
November 15, 2014, 03:52:54 AM |
|
iriendium iri is nothing but a scam shitty coin with this few shitty rendered images to jump start the hype.
|
Stealthcoin, Ark and Safemoon my life 3 investment failures while bashing Ethereum at 0.20cent. Bye bye
|
|
|
amiryaqot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 15, 2014, 05:41:04 AM |
|
iriendium iri is nothing but a scam shitty coin with this few shitty rendered images to jump start the hype. we are on top with 31 votes...
|
|
|
|
StealthSend
Member
Offline
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
Because privacy is a basic human right.
|
|
November 15, 2014, 05:50:22 AM |
|
I asked people on slack to post some info from there here. I have heard nothing about what is going on in slack.
What about the BLOCK fiasco? What is Hondo's position?
StealthCoin joined BlockNet as a technical partner; to be a member coin that would support a distributed API. This API has been dubbed XBridge. We did not join to participate in the ITO and had no knowledge of an ITO when we agreed to become a member coin of the Blocknet. After this agreement, Dan Metcalf and a few others released an ITO for an asset on Next Horizons. All facets of the ITO were organized by members of XC and NHZ, by my limited understanding. The funds from the ITO are in their control. No one from XST has received nor asked for any funds from this ITO, nor have any interest in doing so at the moment. No one from XST conceived of or executed the Blocknet ITO in any way. If there are aspects of the ITO of which I am uncertain, it's because XST was not involved in the ITO's conception or management. Furthermore, as a member of the BlockNet technical community, I suggested, along with a few others, that BlockNet form a panel to approve any expenditures, with approval requiring a majority vote plus one. Additionally, we suggested multiparty escrow of these funds to minimize the potential for any misappropriation. I believe our suggestions will contribute to BlockNet accountability if these suggestions are adopted. If offered any BlockNet ITO funds for merely participating, the XST team would reject them. Moreover, we will not apply for funds from the ITO until the legal status of BlockNet as an organization is fully determined. Finally, the BlockNet community is composed of the lead devs from many exceptional coins. So I do consider it a "super team" where collaborations can start and ideas exchanged. This opinion relates to the Blocknet as the technical coalition that XST agreed to join, not as a business entity that has conducted an ITO. -- Hondo
|
|
|
|
amiryaqot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 15, 2014, 05:56:36 AM |
|
I asked people on slack to post some info from there here. I have heard nothing about what is going on in slack.
What about the BLOCK fiasco? What is Hondo's position?
StealthCoin joined BlockNet as a technical partner; to be a member coin that would support a distributed API. This API has been dubbed XBridge. We did not join to participate in the ITO and had no knowledge of an ITO when we agreed to become a member coin of the Blocknet. After this agreement, Dan Metcalf and a few others released an ITO for an asset on Next Horizons. All facets of the ITO were organized by members of XC and NHZ, by my limited understanding. The funds from the ITO are in their control. No one from XST has received nor asked for any funds from this ITO, nor have any interest in doing so at the moment. No one from XST conceived of or executed the Blocknet ITO in any way. If there are aspects of the ITO of which I am uncertain, it's because XST was not involved in the ITO's conception or management. Furthermore, as a member of the BlockNet technical community, I suggested, along with a few others, that BlockNet form a panel to approve any expenditures, with approval requiring a majority vote plus one. Additionally, we suggested multiparty escrow of these funds to minimize the potential for any misappropriation. I believe our suggestions will contribute to BlockNet accountability if these suggestions are adopted. If offered any BlockNet ITO funds for merely participating, the XST team would reject them. Moreover, we will not apply for funds from the ITO until the legal status of BlockNet as an organization is fully determined. Finally, the BlockNet community is composed of the lead devs from many exceptional coins. So I do consider it a "super team" where collaborations can start and ideas exchanged. This opinion relates to the Blocknet as the technical coalition that XST agreed to join, not as a business entity that has conducted an ITO. -- Hondo is great to hear from Hondo, in Hondo we trust....
|
|
|
|
trafficolaa
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 15, 2014, 06:00:24 AM |
|
I asked people on slack to post some info from there here. I have heard nothing about what is going on in slack.
What about the BLOCK fiasco? What is Hondo's position?
StealthCoin joined BlockNet as a technical partner; to be a member coin that would support a distributed API. This API has been dubbed XBridge. We did not join to participate in the ITO and had no knowledge of an ITO when we agreed to become a member coin of the Blocknet. After this agreement, Dan Metcalf and a few others released an ITO for an asset on Next Horizons. All facets of the ITO were organized by members of XC and NHZ, by my limited understanding. The funds from the ITO are in their control. No one from XST has received nor asked for any funds from this ITO, nor have any interest in doing so at the moment. No one from XST conceived of or executed the Blocknet ITO in any way. If there are aspects of the ITO of which I am uncertain, it's because XST was not involved in the ITO's conception or management. Furthermore, as a member of the BlockNet technical community, I suggested, along with a few others, that BlockNet form a panel to approve any expenditures, with approval requiring a majority vote plus one. Additionally, we suggested multiparty escrow of these funds to minimize the potential for any misappropriation. I believe our suggestions will contribute to BlockNet accountability if these suggestions are adopted. If offered any BlockNet ITO funds for merely participating, the XST team would reject them. Moreover, we will not apply for funds from the ITO until the legal status of BlockNet as an organization is fully determined. Finally, the BlockNet community is composed of the lead devs from many exceptional coins. So I do consider it a "super team" where collaborations can start and ideas exchanged. This opinion relates to the Blocknet as the technical coalition that XST agreed to join, not as a business entity that has conducted an ITO. -- Hondo is great to hear from Hondo, in Hondo we trust.... finally we got official statement from Hondo about it's position on Blocknet, yes agreead with him, in XST we trust, we have great team behind XST..
|
|
|
|
EmilioMann
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1028
#mitandopelomundo
|
|
November 15, 2014, 06:12:51 AM |
|
StealthCoin joined BlockNet as a technical partner; to be a member coin that would support a distributed API. This API has been dubbed XBridge. We did not join to participate in the ITO and had no knowledge of an ITO when we agreed to become a member coin of the Blocknet.
After this agreement, Dan Metcalf and a few others released an ITO for an asset on Next Horizons. All facets of the ITO were organized by members of XC and NHZ, by my limited understanding. The funds from the ITO are in their control. No one from XST has received nor asked for any funds from this ITO, nor have any interest in doing so at the moment. No one from XST conceived of or executed the Blocknet ITO in any way. If there are aspects of the ITO of which I am uncertain, it's because XST was not involved in the ITO's conception or management.
Furthermore, as a member of the BlockNet technical community, I suggested, along with a few others, that BlockNet form a panel to approve any expenditures, with approval requiring a majority vote plus one. Additionally, we suggested multiparty escrow of these funds to minimize the potential for any misappropriation. I believe our suggestions will contribute to BlockNet accountability if these suggestions are adopted.
If offered any BlockNet ITO funds for merely participating, the XST team would reject them. Moreover, we will not apply for funds from the ITO until the legal status of BlockNet as an organization is fully determined.
Finally, the BlockNet community is composed of the lead devs from many exceptional coins. So I do consider it a "super team" where collaborations can start and ideas exchanged. This opinion relates to the Blocknet as the technical coalition that XST agreed to join, not as a business entity that has conducted an ITO.
-- Hondo
Thanks Hondo! The suggestions about ito were accepted http://downloads.xc-official.com/images/14-11-07%20Accountabillity%20-%20Multisig%20Escrow%20of%20Funds.pdf
|
|
|
|
amiryaqot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 15, 2014, 06:16:12 AM |
|
it really great new to hear, Hondo is the best Dev... +100 for Hondo...
|
|
|
|
trafficolaa
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 15, 2014, 06:18:19 AM |
|
StealthCoin joined BlockNet as a technical partner; to be a member coin that would support a distributed API. This API has been dubbed XBridge. We did not join to participate in the ITO and had no knowledge of an ITO when we agreed to become a member coin of the Blocknet.
After this agreement, Dan Metcalf and a few others released an ITO for an asset on Next Horizons. All facets of the ITO were organized by members of XC and NHZ, by my limited understanding. The funds from the ITO are in their control. No one from XST has received nor asked for any funds from this ITO, nor have any interest in doing so at the moment. No one from XST conceived of or executed the Blocknet ITO in any way. If there are aspects of the ITO of which I am uncertain, it's because XST was not involved in the ITO's conception or management.
Furthermore, as a member of the BlockNet technical community, I suggested, along with a few others, that BlockNet form a panel to approve any expenditures, with approval requiring a majority vote plus one. Additionally, we suggested multiparty escrow of these funds to minimize the potential for any misappropriation. I believe our suggestions will contribute to BlockNet accountability if these suggestions are adopted.
If offered any BlockNet ITO funds for merely participating, the XST team would reject them. Moreover, we will not apply for funds from the ITO until the legal status of BlockNet as an organization is fully determined.
Finally, the BlockNet community is composed of the lead devs from many exceptional coins. So I do consider it a "super team" where collaborations can start and ideas exchanged. This opinion relates to the Blocknet as the technical coalition that XST agreed to join, not as a business entity that has conducted an ITO.
-- Hondo
Thanks Hondo! The suggestions about ito were accepted http://downloads.xc-official.com/images/14-11-07%20Accountabillity%20-%20Multisig%20Escrow%20of%20Funds.pdfgreat news coming out now... what about new wallet and anon send? is there any update about it??
|
|
|
|
amiryaqot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 15, 2014, 09:34:54 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
MR1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 927
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 15, 2014, 10:03:13 AM |
|
We are again on Bittrex front page
|
|
|
|
Bavaria
|
|
November 15, 2014, 11:51:16 AM |
|
You can directly purchase Stealth Coins with Euros/USD at: https://www.litebit.eu/en/This maybe especially interesting for the European resident. They can deposit Euros with SEPA system for free! You don`t need BTC anymore to buy XST. Buy Stealth Coin directly with Euros and USD.
|
|
|
|
EmilioMann
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1028
#mitandopelomundo
|
|
November 15, 2014, 06:35:24 PM |
|
StealthCoin joined BlockNet as a technical partner; to be a member coin that would support a distributed API. This API has been dubbed XBridge. We did not join to participate in the ITO and had no knowledge of an ITO when we agreed to become a member coin of the Blocknet.
After this agreement, Dan Metcalf and a few others released an ITO for an asset on Next Horizons. All facets of the ITO were organized by members of XC and NHZ, by my limited understanding. The funds from the ITO are in their control. No one from XST has received nor asked for any funds from this ITO, nor have any interest in doing so at the moment. No one from XST conceived of or executed the Blocknet ITO in any way. If there are aspects of the ITO of which I am uncertain, it's because XST was not involved in the ITO's conception or management.
Furthermore, as a member of the BlockNet technical community, I suggested, along with a few others, that BlockNet form a panel to approve any expenditures, with approval requiring a majority vote plus one. Additionally, we suggested multiparty escrow of these funds to minimize the potential for any misappropriation. I believe our suggestions will contribute to BlockNet accountability if these suggestions are adopted.
If offered any BlockNet ITO funds for merely participating, the XST team would reject them. Moreover, we will not apply for funds from the ITO until the legal status of BlockNet as an organization is fully determined.
Finally, the BlockNet community is composed of the lead devs from many exceptional coins. So I do consider it a "super team" where collaborations can start and ideas exchanged. This opinion relates to the Blocknet as the technical coalition that XST agreed to join, not as a business entity that has conducted an ITO.
-- Hondo
Thanks Hondo! The suggestions about ito were accepted http://downloads.xc-official.com/images/14-11-07%20Accountabillity%20-%20Multisig%20Escrow%20of%20Funds.pdfgreat news coming out now... what about new wallet and anon send? is there any update about it?? xst dev team prefer do ninja launches to surprise us than talking about development continuously. Here is an update written by Hondo on slack yesterday: "We are continuously working on features. The new Qt wallet is almost done. I'm not sure what I can give away, but we have another huge feature Also que Has Been in the works for a while. The dev team is not focused on price. We can not be because it Interferes with development. However, we have Been working on new marketing strategies. It's not clear why the price is low, but Those of us who have spare BTC are buying at These prices. "
|
|
|
|
boopy265420
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1005
|
|
November 15, 2014, 06:43:43 PM |
|
+1 Thanks for updates. This will be surely innovative wallet ever . Great work Hondo.
|
|
|
|
amiryaqot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 15, 2014, 07:22:06 PM |
|
StealthCoin joined BlockNet as a technical partner; to be a member coin that would support a distributed API. This API has been dubbed XBridge. We did not join to participate in the ITO and had no knowledge of an ITO when we agreed to become a member coin of the Blocknet.
After this agreement, Dan Metcalf and a few others released an ITO for an asset on Next Horizons. All facets of the ITO were organized by members of XC and NHZ, by my limited understanding. The funds from the ITO are in their control. No one from XST has received nor asked for any funds from this ITO, nor have any interest in doing so at the moment. No one from XST conceived of or executed the Blocknet ITO in any way. If there are aspects of the ITO of which I am uncertain, it's because XST was not involved in the ITO's conception or management.
Furthermore, as a member of the BlockNet technical community, I suggested, along with a few others, that BlockNet form a panel to approve any expenditures, with approval requiring a majority vote plus one. Additionally, we suggested multiparty escrow of these funds to minimize the potential for any misappropriation. I believe our suggestions will contribute to BlockNet accountability if these suggestions are adopted.
If offered any BlockNet ITO funds for merely participating, the XST team would reject them. Moreover, we will not apply for funds from the ITO until the legal status of BlockNet as an organization is fully determined.
Finally, the BlockNet community is composed of the lead devs from many exceptional coins. So I do consider it a "super team" where collaborations can start and ideas exchanged. This opinion relates to the Blocknet as the technical coalition that XST agreed to join, not as a business entity that has conducted an ITO.
-- Hondo
Thanks Hondo! The suggestions about ito were accepted http://downloads.xc-official.com/images/14-11-07%20Accountabillity%20-%20Multisig%20Escrow%20of%20Funds.pdfgreat news coming out now... what about new wallet and anon send? is there any update about it?? xst dev team prefer do ninja launches to surprise us than talking about development continuously. Here is an update written by Hondo on slack yesterday: "We are continuously working on features. The new Qt wallet is almost done. I'm not sure what I can give away, but we have another huge feature Also que Has Been in the works for a while. The dev team is not focused on price. We can not be because it Interferes with development. However, we have Been working on new marketing strategies. It's not clear why the price is low, but Those of us who have spare BTC are buying at These prices. " woww great news coming out now, new wallet be innovative and on new code base, so XST will make new history, in Hondo we trust...
|
|
|
|
|