[SCAM] BLOCKNET: The Metcalf/Prom Alt-Coin Cartel Scam Exposed

[friendfromnobody]

its funny that people talk about fud ,
but the big quastion is who started the fud?
everybody knows now what and from who blocknet and util is,
fud = news ??
if you look at the skype log you see that proms knows that smurf talks with other people about the news 25e ,
but prom say at the 28e util is mine dont tell anyone its privy.
it looks like he knows that smurf will leak it.
was it a plan or was prom not smart enough and still trusted smurf?

[Black Mamba]

Scam where? 

[00Smurf]

its funny that people talk about fud ,
but the big quastion is who started the fud?
everybody knows now what and from who blocknet and util is,
fud = news ??
if you look at the skype log you see that proms knows that smurf talks with other people about the news 25e ,
but prom say at the 28e util is mine dont tell anyone its privy.
it looks like he knows that smurf will leak it.
was it a plan or was prom not smart enough and still trusted smurf?

Well if you read further, the next convo's we have i clarify what i can and cannot pass onto the sdc team. I was the middleman relaying info to the sdc team as this was when things were being discussed about sdc becoming part of blocknet etc.

Prom's own statement confirms i had to malicious intent. Yet people continue to attack me here.

Aside form that prom started promoting util shortly after anyway. So it's not like he kept it secret long.

[cassius69]

does nobody believe in private messages any more? 

[kago_chiaki]

I do 

[EmilioMann]

Cryptoarticles: A Chronology of the Smear Campaign Against the Blocknet: http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/chronology-of-the-smear-campaign-against-the-blocknet

[UnicornFarts]

You've got a reporter in your pocket who let's you write your own articles.  Congrats ... apparently negativity is a bigger issue in crypto than scams, thefts and fraud.

Seems legit ... everyone have a more positive attitude.  After all

[G-Bert]

Cryptoarticles: A Chronology of the Smear Campaign Against the Blocknet: http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/chronology-of-the-smear-campaign-against-the-blocknet

Try reading it.  Shows the whole story in order,  hence the title.  Both sides.

[00Smurf]

Cryptoarticles: A Chronology of the Smear Campaign Against the Blocknet: http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/chronology-of-the-smear-campaign-against-the-blocknet

Try reading it.  Shows the whole story in order,  hence the title.  Both sides.

im sorry but that does not show both side. No offense.

[OnyxRara]

https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2lalt4/chronology_of_the_smear_campaign_against_the/


Synechist forced to admit authoring 'article'. 

Still has the nerve to come in all pompous and self-righteous as well "Allow me to.."
Guy's such a snake!

[G-Bert]

https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2lalt4/chronology_of_the_smear_campaign_against_the/


Synechist forced to admit authoring 'article'. 

Still has the nerve to come in all pompous and self-righteous as well "Allow me to.."
Guy's such a snake!

I thought it was pretty obvious he wrote it anyway.

Still shows all the "evidence"  posted originally,  and the rebuttals and answers that came after.

Come on,  the forum went mental at the time and whats posted in that article shows what happened. 

[OnyxRara]

https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2lalt4/chronology_of_the_smear_campaign_against_the/


Synechist forced to admit authoring 'article'. 

Still has the nerve to come in all pompous and self-righteous as well "Allow me to.."
Guy's such a snake!

I thought it was pretty obvious he wrote it anyway.

Still shows all the "evidence"  posted originally,  and the rebuttals and answers that came after.

Come on,  the forum went mental at the time and whats posted in that article shows what happened. 

Pretty obvious? Would have been pretty obvious if he had put his name on it like an honest person. 

Are you writing this kind of thing because you bought blocknet tokens? Not trying to be rude, just you seem so keen to down play or pretend it doesn't matter when he is being dishonest like this. I could understand though if you have a lot of money in it. Got stuck in some bad ones myself with crypto

[Spoetnik]

Cryptoarticles: A Chronology of the Smear Campaign Against the Blocknet: http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/chronology-of-the-smear-campaign-against-the-blocknet

"Smear Campaign" ya right.. gimme a break  

unless a place such a Coindesk posts about all these bullshit web sites are bullshit web sites.. full of bull shit by paid bull shit'ers and secret coin conspirators etc

i have watched groups manipulate this scene with their "new sites" and.. their own shit coin factory with team of eBuddies.
and as matter of fact there is long time competing groups of these dipshit fuckers too.

ohhh they FUD'd me booo hoooooo

no you just got caught Dan because you tried take take a million dollars and that was pushing it too far.

and guys WOW i am seeing how half the key little string pullers in this scene are named Dan.. WTF ? LOL
same guy or many guys named Dan ? i don't know really..

[G-Bert]

https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2lalt4/chronology_of_the_smear_campaign_against_the/


Synechist forced to admit authoring 'article'. 

Still has the nerve to come in all pompous and self-righteous as well "Allow me to.."
Guy's such a snake!

I thought it was pretty obvious he wrote it anyway.

Still shows all the "evidence"  posted originally,  and the rebuttals and answers that came after.

Come on,  the forum went mental at the time and whats posted in that article shows what happened. 

Pretty obvious? Would have been pretty obvious if he had put his name on it like an honest person. 

Are you writing this kind of thing because you bought blocknet tokens? Not trying to be rude, just you seem so keen to down play or pretend it doesn't matter when he is being dishonest like this. I could understand though if you have a lot of money in it. Got stuck in some bad ones myself with crypto

Nope. Wasn't a big fan of the idea originally, was expecting to maybe get some on the cheap after the ITO.

Holding some XC though so was pissed with the fudfest and what its tried to do to Dans reputation.

Do you not think the article at least proves it very likely it was orchestrated?

p.s. I thought it was obvious from the first paragraph. Its basically a copy paste of something he wrote previously.

Plus the fact when the article was first posted it was this -

Got an official statement by email which I was asked to publish :

http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/chronology-of-the-smear-campaign-against-the-blocknet

See bold text. Nothing underhand by Synechist.

[G-Bert]

Cryptoarticles: A Chronology of the Smear Campaign Against the Blocknet: http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/chronology-of-the-smear-campaign-against-the-blocknet

...rabble rabble rabble...

...and guys WOW i am seeing how half the key little string pullers in this scene are named Dan.. WTF ? LOL
same guy or many guys named Dan ?

Says the guy who thought Prom = Dan, and now thinks there is too many dans. lol.

[00Smurf]

https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2lalt4/chronology_of_the_smear_campaign_against_the/


Synechist forced to admit authoring 'article'. 

Still has the nerve to come in all pompous and self-righteous as well "Allow me to.."
Guy's such a snake!

I thought it was pretty obvious he wrote it anyway.

Still shows all the "evidence"  posted originally,  and the rebuttals and answers that came after.

Come on,  the forum went mental at the time and whats posted in that article shows what happened. 

actually it really doesn't.

[fran2k]

Wow, thanks, tremendous OP. Reading...

[Spoetnik]

Cryptoarticles: A Chronology of the Smear Campaign Against the Blocknet: http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/chronology-of-the-smear-campaign-against-the-blocknet

"Smear Campaign" ya right.. gimme a break 

unless a place such a Coindesk posts about all these bullshit web sites are bullshit web sites.. full of bull shit by paid bull shit'ers and secret coin conspirators etc

i have watched groups manipulate this scene with their "new sites" and.. their own shit coin factory with team of eBuddies.
and as matter of fact there is long time competing groups of these dipshit fuckers too.

ohhh they FUD'd me booo hoooooo

no you just got caught Dan because you tried take take a million dollars and that was pushing it too far.

and guys WOW i am seeing how half the key little string pullers in this scene are named Dan.. WTF ? LOL
same guy or many guys named Dan ? i don't know really..

Says the guy who thought Prom = Dan, and now thinks there is too many dans. lol.

owned = http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/blocknet-ito-subject-of-all-kinds-of-allegations-but-who-is-right

that was the first attempt by them to cover it up and i dominated their ass !

hence the need to try again on a second story that is in the quote above.

[leewilson]

Cryptoarticles: A Chronology of the Smear Campaign Against the Blocknet: http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/chronology-of-the-smear-campaign-against-the-blocknet

"Smear Campaign" ya right.. gimme a break  

unless a place such a Coindesk posts about all these bullshit web sites are bullshit web sites.. full of bull shit by paid bull shit'ers and secret coin conspirators etc

i have watched groups manipulate this scene with their "new sites" and.. their own shit coin factory with team of eBuddies.
and as matter of fact there is long time competing groups of these dipshit fuckers too.

ohhh they FUD'd me booo hoooooo

no you just got caught Dan because you tried take take a million dollars and that was pushing it too far.

and guys WOW i am seeing how half the key little string pullers in this scene are named Dan.. WTF ? LOL
same guy or many guys named Dan ? i don't know really..

Says the guy who thought Prom = Dan, and now thinks there is too many dans. lol.

owned = http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/blocknet-ito-subject-of-all-kinds-of-allegations-but-who-is-right

that was the first attempt by them to cover it up and i dominated their ass !

hence the need to try again on a second story that is in the quote above.

My thoughts exactly. I could hardly get past the title containing "smear campaign against blocknet".
If that is not the most biased load then I do not know what is. And it does not even touch on the heart of the issues.
They just keep brushing past the meat and addressing a few points and calling it all cleaned up.

Just like the other rag, coinssource, who had the audacity to say that Dan Metcalf was a "reputable small business owner".
When I questioned them regarding any investigation that they performed or if they believed "reputable" meant someone who owes large amounts of cash to multiple people, they said they stood by their statement. I searched the irc chat they had with Dan Metcalf and I saw nothing mentioned regarding small business ownership so how did they know he owned a business and if he was reputable? For them to make that statement means they did not do any research whatsoever. And to think they also provide POD services...WHAT?!? You can't make this bs up.

[allyouracid]

Cryptoarticles: A Chronology of the Smear Campaign Against the Blocknet: http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/chronology-of-the-smear-campaign-against-the-blocknet

...rabble rabble rabble...

...and guys WOW i am seeing how half the key little string pullers in this scene are named Dan.. WTF ? LOL
same guy or many guys named Dan ?

Says the guy who thought Prom = Dan, and now thinks there is too many dans. lol.

Yep! I strongly suggest to stop Dansing; we're not at a party here!!1