Phildo
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000
|
 |
May 30, 2015, 01:33:12 PM |
|
How do you know their funds are coming out of Bitmixer ? AFAIK, Bitmixer does not have any fixed mixer address !!! Moreover, CMW have explained multiple times in the thread why their payment do not come from mining address. They even mentioned it in their FAQ ( www.cloudmining.website/faq.php - Q2 - Point iv). It seems that in an effort to malign a legit service that is paying for seven months now, you are trying to bring in hypothetical allegations. This is cheap... That reason is horseshit. If that was somehow true, they could still show proof that they control an address that has fresh coins. |
|
|
|
|
marcotheminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049
┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴
|
|
May 30, 2015, 05:23:28 PM |
|
.. fixed mixer address !!! Moreover, ...
Why is your writing style so similar to that of the FAQ? You can not !!! Period. Not many people (let alone companies) write with "!!!" with spaces before and after. Just a little thing I noticed. |
|
|
|
|
marcotheminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049
┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴
|
|
May 30, 2015, 05:28:44 PM |
|
How do you know their funds are coming out of Bitmixer ? AFAIK, Bitmixer does not have any fixed mixer address !!! Moreover, CMW have explained multiple times in the thread why their payment do not come from mining address. They even mentioned it in their FAQ ( www.cloudmining.website/faq.php - Q2 - Point iv). It seems that in an effort to malign a legit service that is paying for seven months now, you are trying to bring in hypothetical allegations. This is cheap... I'm certain. Try inputting a known mixing address as the forward address (you should know some.. If you don't, which I doubt, try using: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1072521.0 - 1Mi4651GwFKyREZEv18sDE7ieLDsbQ12dZ ; a known mixing address under the control of bitmixer). It'll give you an error, bitmixer owns that address (you can't use it as a forward address). That's how I know. |
|
|
|
|
Salmen
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1059
Merit: 1020
|
|
May 30, 2015, 07:04:56 PM |
|
The "forgot password" function isn't working.
Please fix that!
|
Young Developer amidst Europe. Specialized in Web Programming and Creating Telegram Bots. Looking for a developer? Feel free to drop a mail to me. Running JaguarBitcoin - Your Place For Scripts |
|
|
|
Vitamin King
|
|
May 31, 2015, 10:47:09 PM |
|
.. fixed mixer address !!! Moreover, ...
Why is your writing style so similar to that of the FAQ? You can not !!! Period. Not many people (let alone companies) write with "!!!" with spaces before and after. Just a little thing I noticed. I'm delighted that they use my writing style. I should not have asked their authenticity a few months back - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=852857.0How do you know their funds are coming out of Bitmixer ? AFAIK, Bitmixer does not have any fixed mixer address !!! Moreover, CMW have explained multiple times in the thread why their payment do not come from mining address. They even mentioned it in their FAQ ( www.cloudmining.website/faq.php - Q2 - Point iv). It seems that in an effort to malign a legit service that is paying for seven months now, you are trying to bring in hypothetical allegations. This is cheap... I'm certain. Try inputting a known mixing address as the forward address (you should know some.. If you don't, which I doubt, try using: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1072521.0 - 1Mi4651GwFKyREZEv18sDE7ieLDsbQ12dZ ; a known mixing address under the control of bitmixer). It'll give you an error, bitmixer owns that address (you can't use it as a forward address). That's how I know. I tried inputting 1N9unBxizvpmJf4t3L6x558dz5r1mxj1KS. Bitmixer did not give any error. |
Not your Keys = Not your Coin | No Risk = No Gain |
|
|
marcotheminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049
┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴
|
|
June 01, 2015, 09:13:03 AM |
|
Is 1N9unBxizvpmJf4t3L6x558dz5r1mxj1KS a known bitmixer address? No error means it is not an address under their control, instead it is most likely an address owned by cloudmining.website which they use to collect mixed funds. These funds are then deposited to their payout address to pay users.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vitamin King
|
|
June 02, 2015, 09:00:06 AM |
|
Is 1N9unBxizvpmJf4t3L6x558dz5r1mxj1KS a known bitmixer address? No error means it is not an address under their control, instead it is most likely an address owned by cloudmining.website which they use to collect mixed funds. These funds are then deposited to their payout address to pay users.
If it does not belong to bitmixer, then it belongs to CMW !!! How did you derive this conclusion ? Rather, it is more likely that 1N9unBxizvpmJf4t3L6x558dz5r1mxj1KS belongs to the person/service who is buying the fresh coins from CMW. That person/service is mixing the payout and then paying to CMW from 1N9unBxizvpmJf4t3L6x558dz5r1mxj1KS. That seems more logical in my opinion. |
Not your Keys = Not your Coin | No Risk = No Gain |
|
|
|
Muhammed Zakir
|
|
June 02, 2015, 10:01:27 AM |
|
Is 1N9unBxizvpmJf4t3L6x558dz5r1mxj1KS a known bitmixer address? No error means it is not an address under their control, instead it is most likely an address owned by cloudmining.website which they use to collect mixed funds. These funds are then deposited to their payout address to pay users.
If it does not belong to bitmixer, then it belongs to CMW !!! How did you derive this conclusion ? Rather, it is more likely that 1N9unBxizvpmJf4t3L6x558dz5r1mxj1KS belongs to the person/service who is buying the fresh coins from CMW. That person/service is mixing the payout and then paying to CMW from 1N9unBxizvpmJf4t3L6x558dz5r1mxj1KS. That seems more logical in my opinion. Who said people are buying new;y minted coins from CMW? CMW obviously put that in FAQ so that people won't question them about minted coins. CMW is not mining... |
|
|
|
Phildo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 02, 2015, 01:53:27 PM |
|
Is 1N9unBxizvpmJf4t3L6x558dz5r1mxj1KS a known bitmixer address? No error means it is not an address under their control, instead it is most likely an address owned by cloudmining.website which they use to collect mixed funds. These funds are then deposited to their payout address to pay users.
If it does not belong to bitmixer, then it belongs to CMW !!! How did you derive this conclusion ? Rather, it is more likely that 1N9unBxizvpmJf4t3L6x558dz5r1mxj1KS belongs to the person/service who is buying the fresh coins from CMW. That person/service is mixing the payout and then paying to CMW from 1N9unBxizvpmJf4t3L6x558dz5r1mxj1KS. That seems more logical in my opinion. Who said people are buying new;y minted coins from CMW? CMW obviously put that in FAQ so that people won't question them about minted coins. CMW is not mining... It's probably the people that were paying Bitcoins Savings and Trust way over value for coins back in the day. They needed a new supplier after that company closed down in a completely legitimate manner. |
|
|
|
|
|
Vitamin King
|
|
June 04, 2015, 03:03:27 PM |
|
Is 1N9unBxizvpmJf4t3L6x558dz5r1mxj1KS a known bitmixer address? No error means it is not an address under their control, instead it is most likely an address owned by cloudmining.website which they use to collect mixed funds. These funds are then deposited to their payout address to pay users.
If it does not belong to bitmixer, then it belongs to CMW !!! How did you derive this conclusion ? Rather, it is more likely that 1N9unBxizvpmJf4t3L6x558dz5r1mxj1KS belongs to the person/service who is buying the fresh coins from CMW. That person/service is mixing the payout and then paying to CMW from 1N9unBxizvpmJf4t3L6x558dz5r1mxj1KS. That seems more logical in my opinion. Who said people are buying new;y minted coins from CMW? CMW obviously put that in FAQ so that people won't question them about minted coins. CMW is not mining... Either they are mining or they are ponzi. In any case, they are paying for over seven months now. That means, either you are lying here or people are not listening to you at all and keep throwing their coins. Either way you are wasting time here  |
Not your Keys = Not your Coin | No Risk = No Gain |
|
|
|
Muhammed Zakir
|
|
June 04, 2015, 03:19:15 PM |
|
Is 1N9unBxizvpmJf4t3L6x558dz5r1mxj1KS a known bitmixer address? No error means it is not an address under their control, instead it is most likely an address owned by cloudmining.website which they use to collect mixed funds. These funds are then deposited to their payout address to pay users.
If it does not belong to bitmixer, then it belongs to CMW !!! How did you derive this conclusion ? Rather, it is more likely that 1N9unBxizvpmJf4t3L6x558dz5r1mxj1KS belongs to the person/service who is buying the fresh coins from CMW. That person/service is mixing the payout and then paying to CMW from 1N9unBxizvpmJf4t3L6x558dz5r1mxj1KS. That seems more logical in my opinion. Who said people are buying new;y minted coins from CMW? CMW obviously put that in FAQ so that people won't question them about minted coins. CMW is not mining... Either they are mining or they are ponzi. In any case, they are paying for over seven months now. That means, either you are lying here or people are not listening to you at all and keep throwing their coins. Either way you are wasting time here It means people are greedy to throw away their money. Yeah, I know my time is being wasted but it is okay for me.  |
|
|
|
|
SpanishSoldier
|
|
June 06, 2015, 05:07:13 PM |
|
Hey! Spanish Soldier.. i think you will earn more when you will own some other advert in your signature than from this service.. Just saying..
LoLz... CMW campaign is a bit different than others. They allow to keep own referral link in signature and hence I get extra earning apart from their sig payment. Overall my earning is at par or better than other sig campaigns. I also applied for one sig campaign before... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=814895.msg10656176#msg10656176Since they first said they'll take me in and then rejected as their list were full, I did not try any other campaign |
|
|
|
|
|
jimmothy
|
|
June 07, 2015, 02:14:14 AM |
|
On November 1st you had 21 customers. Today you have 32 customers. That's an average of 1.5 customers per month. Impressive. Here's a tip: If you want more suckers I mean customers for your totally legit mining business, you might want to make your business look less like a blatant ponzi. So I just checked their weekly payout and now they are paying to 56 addresses. How amazing is it that immediately after being called out, they mysteriously acquire more customers in the next week than they had acquired over the past 7 months? This scam really is a joke. It almost seems like the ponzi operator isn't even trying. The shill accounts are so obvious, the ponzi is so transparent, and the excuses are so laughable that I'm starting to think this might just be a social experiment to see how naive/gullible some bitcoiners really are. |
|
|
|
|
|
Muhammed Zakir
|
|
June 07, 2015, 05:19:15 AM |
|
On November 1st you had 21 customers. Today you have 32 customers. That's an average of 1.5 customers per month. Impressive. Here's a tip: If you want more suckers I mean customers for your totally legit mining business, you might want to make your business look less like a blatant ponzi. So I just checked their weekly payout and now they are paying to 56 addresses. How amazing is it that immediately after being called out, they mysteriously acquire more customers in the next week than they had acquired over the past 7 months? This scam really is a joke. It almost seems like the ponzi operator isn't even trying. The shill accounts are so obvious, the ponzi is so transparent, and the excuses are so laughable that I'm starting to think this might just be a social experiment to see how naive/gullible some bitcoiners really are. We can't judge how many customers they have by looking counting payouts because they can fake payouts very easily. |
|
|
|
|
jseppeli
|
|
June 07, 2015, 09:35:06 AM |
|
On November 1st you had 21 customers. Today you have 32 customers. That's an average of 1.5 customers per month. Impressive. Here's a tip: If you want more suckers I mean customers for your totally legit mining business, you might want to make your business look less like a blatant ponzi. So I just checked their weekly payout and now they are paying to 56 addresses. How amazing is it that immediately after being called out, they mysteriously acquire more customers in the next week than they had acquired over the past 7 months? This scam really is a joke. It almost seems like the ponzi operator isn't even trying. The shill accounts are so obvious, the ponzi is so transparent, and the excuses are so laughable that I'm starting to think this might just be a social experiment to see how naive/gullible some bitcoiners really are. We can't judge how many customers they have by looking counting payouts because they can fake payouts very easily. The amount of adresses they pay to differs weekly because they are paying out only to customers with an account balance greater than 0.01BTC. So as an example I have not been paid in several weeks because I have only 90GHs there and I'm never going to break even due to low payouts!! |
|
|
|
|
|
Muhammed Zakir
|
|
June 07, 2015, 10:54:25 AM |
|
On November 1st you had 21 customers. Today you have 32 customers. That's an average of 1.5 customers per month. Impressive. Here's a tip: If you want more suckers I mean customers for your totally legit mining business, you might want to make your business look less like a blatant ponzi. So I just checked their weekly payout and now they are paying to 56 addresses. How amazing is it that immediately after being called out, they mysteriously acquire more customers in the next week than they had acquired over the past 7 months? This scam really is a joke. It almost seems like the ponzi operator isn't even trying. The shill accounts are so obvious, the ponzi is so transparent, and the excuses are so laughable that I'm starting to think this might just be a social experiment to see how naive/gullible some bitcoiners really are. We can't judge how many customers they have by looking counting payouts because they can fake payouts very easily. The amount of adresses they pay to differs weekly because they are paying out only to customers with an account balance greater than 0.01BTC. So as an example I have not been paid in several weeks because I have only 90GHs there and I'm never going to break even due to low payouts!! I didn't knew that, This is obviously for ensuring their ponzi lasts long. With 90 GHs, you could get payout in ~14 days. We still don't know whether they pays to their own addresses. So it is not wise to count output addresses as customers' addresses. |
|
|
|
|
jseppeli
|
|
June 07, 2015, 12:51:47 PM |
|
On November 1st you had 21 customers. Today you have 32 customers. That's an average of 1.5 customers per month. Impressive. Here's a tip: If you want more suckers I mean customers for your totally legit mining business, you might want to make your business look less like a blatant ponzi. So I just checked their weekly payout and now they are paying to 56 addresses. How amazing is it that immediately after being called out, they mysteriously acquire more customers in the next week than they had acquired over the past 7 months? This scam really is a joke. It almost seems like the ponzi operator isn't even trying. The shill accounts are so obvious, the ponzi is so transparent, and the excuses are so laughable that I'm starting to think this might just be a social experiment to see how naive/gullible some bitcoiners really are. We can't judge how many customers they have by looking counting payouts because they can fake payouts very easily. The amount of adresses they pay to differs weekly because they are paying out only to customers with an account balance greater than 0.01BTC. So as an example I have not been paid in several weeks because I have only 90GHs there and I'm never going to break even due to low payouts!! I didn't knew that, This is obviously for ensuring their ponzi lasts long. With 90 GHs, you could get payout in ~14 days. We still don't know whether they pays to their own addresses. So it is not wise to count output addresses as customers' addresses. Here is my complete payout history 2244 0.0059644 f7d711271f5dec16dfec1cd9342692a498c6c9b1d8a08687b40be4e0035932eb 2014-11-24 13:39:10 2302 0.007973 7e449a5190b799ac21607c8c84f4a16e7fea58722e55edd406e27542bea4758a 2014-12-01 14:03:24 2371 0.00506485 187682e30cd8c9c0002b0ff377d8b87b69d8688c4f87aaeb1de4a41252d8e39b 2014-12-08 10:06:46 2457 0.00525969 a8b2a2b159e93eb23abc8d93dea5f775703bd9094e2529aa8303531365f90d39 2014-12-15 17:14:37 2535 0.00356272 a6e17f25ff95d13d6b7fddeb229fab372bcea45b9967557afd7f48bc92ed987c 2014-12-22 14:17:14 2572 0.00353708 70d6d485b01d1cfb99f745b99691457d908a2f87c6055c15401014f2318e6cbd 2014-12-29 16:54:47 2642 0.00415796 95fc145d5dcd2c317bb6121a68d3503e74c5cb269a3ba670da11fa381871f0ca 2015-01-05 15:53:54 2735 0.00673803 c713eb36b6271889ba9ceb4ddd5415b23672ab0b42f3229ee0b0da3d03c19cf7 2015-01-12 12:02:01 2870 0.01353314 44ae539e47766da5a613409f375808c3aac8c5b45620bc470638c7d1839096ec 2015-01-26 16:28:05 3157 0.01039738 58e8fb0192994e5a2eacf49d27aeef5b1825e3ea93d6cdc76afec930d9d0d6dd 2015-04-13 17:01:04 Pending 0.00321805 BTC right now just less than 3 months to get 0.01BTC and it seems that soon 2 months since payout and only a third collected of the 0.01 needed for payout received 0.06618825 so far since I bought my 90GHs in middle of November 2014 At that time they paid every week |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ml73
|
|
June 09, 2015, 08:36:39 PM |
|
I just noticed in CMW referral page. Have somebody really received 3,2 bitcoins referral commission ??
How much ghs this customer has bought ??
|
|
|
|
|
SpanishSoldier
|
|
June 10, 2015, 06:38:12 PM |
|
I just noticed in CMW referral page. Have somebody really received 3,2 bitcoins referral commission ??
How much ghs this customer has bought ??
Referral commission gets summed up for each sale we make. Hence 3.2 BTC does not need to be made in a single sale. It might be the total accumulated sum of last seven months for a certain referrer. Moreover, referral commission was 15% for a short span of time. So, it is difficult to calculate. |
|
|
|
|
|
