getwork
|
|
December 01, 2014, 08:59:59 PM |
|
The main nickname of this guy is Eliovp(not sure it's the only one) Nicknames Sabotage and LovesToShare are with he sells and shares (stollen or genuine) Wolf0's kernels here. Sorry Wolf0, perhaps you got the wrong guy to help you!
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
December 01, 2014, 09:01:55 PM |
|
The main nickname of this guy is Eliovp(not sure it's the only one) Nicknames Sabotage and LovesToShare are with he sells and shares (stollen or genuine) Wolf0's kernels here. Sorry Wolf0, perhaps you got the wrong guy to help you! how do you know that ? (actually I thought that LovesToShares was sp_ )
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
getwork
|
|
December 01, 2014, 09:04:20 PM Last edit: December 01, 2014, 09:25:35 PM by getwork |
|
The main nickname of this guy is Eliovp(not sure it's the only one) Nicknames Sabotage and LovesToShare are with he sells and shares (stollen or genuine) Wolf0's kernels here. Sorry Wolf0, perhaps you got the wrong guy to help you! how do you know that ? (actually I thought that LovesToShares was sp_ ) Talking to him with both Eliovp&Sabotage! I will publish interesting things soon! Anyway, this kernel&bins are pretty close to the genuine ones!
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
December 01, 2014, 09:13:57 PM |
|
The main nickname of this guy is Eliovp(not sure it's the only one) Nicknames Sabotage and LovesToShare are with he sells and shares (stollen or genuine) Wolf0's kernels here. Sorry Wolf0, perhaps you got the wrong guy to help you! how do you know that ? (actually I thought that LovesToShares was sp_ ) Talking to him with both Eliovp&Sabotage! I will publish interesting things soon! Anyway, this kernel&bins a pretty close to the genuine ones! getting lost... by genuine one do you mean the standard one or the Wolf0 (nobody saw yet) ?
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
getwork
|
|
December 01, 2014, 09:26:42 PM |
|
The main nickname of this guy is Eliovp(not sure it's the only one) Nicknames Sabotage and LovesToShare are with he sells and shares (stollen or genuine) Wolf0's kernels here. Sorry Wolf0, perhaps you got the wrong guy to help you! how do you know that ? (actually I thought that LovesToShares was sp_ ) Talking to him with both Eliovp&Sabotage! I will publish interesting things soon! Anyway, this kernel&bins a pretty close to the genuine ones! getting lost... by genuine one do you mean the standard one or the Wolf0 (nobody saw yet) ? I had in mind that Wolf0 is a step ahead already!
|
|
|
|
getwork
|
|
December 01, 2014, 09:27:41 PM |
|
The main nickname of this guy is Eliovp(not sure it's the only one) Nicknames Sabotage and LovesToShare are with he sells and shares (stollen or genuine) Wolf0's kernels here. Sorry Wolf0, perhaps you got the wrong guy to help you! how do you know that ? (actually I thought that LovesToShares was sp_ ) Talking to him with both Eliovp&Sabotage! I will publish interesting things soon! Anyway, this kernel&bins a pretty close to the genuine ones! getting lost... by genuine one do you mean the standard one or the Wolf0 (nobody saw yet) ? I had in mind that Wolf0 is a step ahead already! This kernels@bins are the old ones with missing components(not only x13 bins)
|
|
|
|
Sabotage
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
December 01, 2014, 09:37:11 PM |
|
The main nickname of this guy is Eliovp(not sure it's the only one) Nicknames Sabotage and LovesToShare are with he sells and shares (stollen or genuine) Wolf0's kernels here. Sorry Wolf0, perhaps you got the wrong guy to help you! how do you know that ? (actually I thought that LovesToShares was sp_ ) Talking to him with both Eliovp&Sabotage! I will publish interesting things soon! Anyway, this kernel&bins are pretty close to the genuine ones! Haha! Did someone lose his little extra on the side business? It sure seems so
|
|
|
|
getwork
|
|
December 01, 2014, 09:57:15 PM Last edit: December 01, 2014, 10:37:28 PM by getwork |
|
The main nickname of this guy is Eliovp(not sure it's the only one) Nicknames Sabotage and LovesToShare are with he sells and shares (stollen or genuine) Wolf0's kernels here. Sorry Wolf0, perhaps you got the wrong guy to help you! That ain't mine; Sabotage has been renting rigs and not paying to message people, trying to sell fake shit. This sounds bad! If you are not him where the hell you know what he doing from? What about this screenshot? - http://imgur.com/BYwdPxx
|
|
|
|
Sabotage
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
December 01, 2014, 10:23:42 PM |
|
The main nickname of this guy is Eliovp(not sure it's the only one) Nicknames Sabotage and LovesToShare are with he sells and shares (stollen or genuine) Wolf0's kernels here. Sorry Wolf0, perhaps you got the wrong guy to help you! That ain't mine; Sabotage has been renting rigs and not paying to message people, trying to sell fake shit. This sounds bad! If you are not him where the hell you know what he doing from? What about this screenshot? - https://filetea.me/t1s0g8vYgxuT9S95kxxrBQAswTook a long time to post that "screenshot" Congratulations, you're good with Photoshop Oh, aren't you the one who sold to the user "mamator"? (The one who is sending pm's to everyone?) Funny how you're trying to clear your name so badly. Keep it up bozo
|
|
|
|
qbits
|
|
December 01, 2014, 10:51:02 PM |
|
This is something else indeed. LoveToShare, I would love if you shared some .cl files so that I could compare them with other darkcoin-mod.cl files. BTW did you compile those? Anyway thanks for sharing...
|
|
|
|
qbits
|
|
December 01, 2014, 10:54:49 PM |
|
This is something else indeed. LoveToShare, I would love if you shared some .cl files so that I could compare them with other darkcoin-mod.cl files. BTW did you compile those?
Anyway thanks for sharing...
Also I'm buying lunch if you stop by...
|
|
|
|
qbits
|
|
December 02, 2014, 12:43:57 AM |
|
This is something else indeed. LoveToShare, I would love if you shared some .cl files so that I could compare them with other darkcoin-mod.cl files. BTW did you compile those?
Anyway thanks for sharing...
Also I'm buying lunch if you stop by... From his screenshot, all he has is some shitty cl and some slightly better bin files that Sabotage probably made himself by tweaking a few options in the stock darkcoin-mod and then tried to sell off as mine. Looking at bin file size, I'd say they forced some parts of the code not to "unroll" as the whole bin is 1/2 size. I'd love to look at their .cl to see what they've done. In the performace side, 7950 is running at 4.9MH/s up from 3.0, 280X is about 6.4 up from 3.9 (on stock clocks. btw I have a problem with trixx and recent amd drivers, namely on 280x i seem to be able to set gpu clock and memclock, but gpu-z still shows stock clocks. Afterburner is even worse. Do you know what's with that?) and 290X/X2 is at 8.7 per core up from 5.6 all on stock clocks. Not bat at all I'd say. I will have to setup tomorrow to measure power usage...
|
|
|
|
qbits
|
|
December 02, 2014, 01:09:21 AM |
|
This is something else indeed. LoveToShare, I would love if you shared some .cl files so that I could compare them with other darkcoin-mod.cl files. BTW did you compile those?
Anyway thanks for sharing...
Also I'm buying lunch if you stop by... From his screenshot, all he has is some shitty cl and some slightly better bin files that Sabotage probably made himself by tweaking a few options in the stock darkcoin-mod and then tried to sell off as mine. Looking at bin file size, I'd say they forced some parts of the code not to "unroll" as the whole bin is 1/2 size. I'd love to look at their .cl to see what they've done. In the performace side, 7950 is running at 4.9MH/s up from 3.0, 280X is about 6.4 up from 3.9 (on stock clocks. btw I have a problem with trixx and recent amd drivers, namely on 280x i seem to be able to set gpu clock and memclock, but gpu-z still shows stock clocks. Afterburner is even worse. Do you know what's with that?) and 290X/X2 is at 8.7 per core up from 5.6 all on stock clocks. Not bat at all I'd say. I will have to setup tomorrow to measure power usage... Oh, goody. Now I might have to go kill someone. It could be an old version of mine - narrows the culprit down. Are these yours? Have you looked at the .bin files? p.s. what's with the Trixx and latest drivers? I cannot seem to be able to set gpu and mem clocks....
|
|
|
|
qbits
|
|
December 02, 2014, 01:13:44 AM |
|
Oh, goody. Now I might have to go kill someone. It could be an old version of mine - narrows the culprit down.
here is copypaste from my so called management dashboard: you can guess the cards by their respective hash rates except the first one @ 720kH/s which is an old 5770 I used for testing. Row: 1 Rack: 1 Rack: 2 Rack: 3 Rack: 4 Rack: 5 Shelf:1 Name bit.siopti.com IP-Port bit.siopti.com-4028 Uptime 2w 1d 0h 11m 50s kH/s 704.2 HW_Errors 0 Pool_Rej% 0.1872 Dev_Rej% 0.1872 Blocks 0 Utility 1.3072 Device Temper Fan kH/s GPU0 72.0C -1 720.3 Shelf:1 Name coin.siopti.com IP-Port coin.siopti.com-4028 Host DOWN! Shelf:1 Name giga.siopti.com IP-Port giga.siopti.com-4028 Uptime 0w 0d 2h 36m 30s kH/s 20854.8 HW_Errors 0 Pool_Rej% 0.0957 Dev_Rej% 0.0957 Blocks 0 Utility 40.0136 Device Temper Fan kH/s GPU0 61.0C 1430 6076.8 GPU1 72.0C 1702 6437.0 GPU2 73.0C 1633 4848.3 GPU3 70.0C 1203 4908.7 Shelf:1 Name lite.siopti.com IP-Port lite.siopti.com-4028 Uptime 0w 0d 2h 33m 6s kH/s 17753.4 HW_Errors 0 Pool_Rej% 0.2752 Dev_Rej% 0.2752 Blocks 0 Utility 30.7657 Device Temper Fan kH/s GPU0 57.0C -1 8683.0 GPU1 58.0C -1 8671.9 Shelf:1 Name mega.siopti.com IP-Port mega.siopti.com-4028 Uptime 0w 0d 2h 40m 10s kH/s 18467.9 HW_Errors 0 Pool_Rej% 0.2519 Dev_Rej% 0.2519 Blocks 0 Utility 32.1401 Device Temper Fan kH/s GPU0 70.0C 1253 6111.6 GPU1 70.0C 1434 6121.0 GPU2 62.0C 1374 6151.5
|
|
|
|
qbits
|
|
December 02, 2014, 01:28:10 AM |
|
There's no way to tell 100% from the bin files, but you couldn't have known mine were far smaller than the shit code unless you had one - it's a little old, but your hashrates are also correct. Someone has stolen from me.
Well seems this has been in the wild for a while. File modification date is Nov 18th. Anyway you're also invited for a lunch. We can discuss X11 and "other things in littérature"
|
|
|
|
aikklond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 02, 2014, 09:05:34 AM |
|
I am inserting the kernels in sgminer 5.0 (in the kernels folder) and I am also copying bin files in the main sgminer folder.
Then i run -k darkcoin-mod, no change in hash rate . What am I doing wrong?
@ wolf0 , dont say that i did not predict the leak. If you make a kernel/miner with good hashrate and a reasonable donate option I will use yours. Hope that others think the same as i do.
|
|
|
|
bensam123
|
|
December 02, 2014, 09:39:22 AM |
|
Yup and imagine that, a highly desirable product has now been leaked and is pretty much worthless to the author. Too bad you didn't release it with a modest dev fee attached. Instead people got pissed off you were trying to sell it for so much that they don't even consider it a option and there are people trying to resell it themselves for less or outright leaked it. But don't worry, I'm sure no one would've used your custom miner. -_- The problem may-be is that you forgot to donate for sgminer while you should have. Same applies to standard sgminer, someone wrap up the code expecting from users they will donate... he was wrong, some moron thought they didn't have to make donations Donations ARE NOT required. They are given of their free will. What you're talking about is a fee and someone not paying a fee. Don't confuse the two. Donations are not the same as a fee. You are happy if you get donations, if any. Fees are required to purchase a product. Don't go on bitching about something like this when you could put a dev fee in. It's your own fault if you feel you deserve money for work for 'donating' it. NO ONE HAS TO DONATE. Donation expectations should be set at 0.
|
|
|
|
aikklond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 02, 2014, 11:09:20 AM |
|
I am inserting the kernels in sgminer 5.0 (in the kernels folder) and I am also copying bin files in the main sgminer folder.
Then i run -k darkcoin-mod, no change in hash rate . What am I doing wrong?
@ wolf0 , dont say that i did not predict the leak. If you make a kernel/miner with good hashrate and a reasonable donate option I will use yours. Hope that others think the same as i do.
Use worksize 64, generate bins by yourself, then replace those bins with mine, using the same name as the ones you generated. Yup and imagine that, a highly desirable product has now been leaked and is pretty much worthless to the author. Too bad you didn't release it with a modest dev fee attached. Instead people got pissed off you were trying to sell it for so much that they don't even consider it a option and there are people trying to resell it themselves for less or outright leaked it. But don't worry, I'm sure no one would've used your custom miner. -_- The problem may-be is that you forgot to donate for sgminer while you should have. Same applies to standard sgminer, someone wrap up the code expecting from users they will donate... he was wrong, some moron thought they didn't have to make donations Donations ARE NOT required. They are given of their free will. What you're talking about is a fee and someone not paying a fee. Don't confuse the two. Donations are not the same as a fee. You are happy if you get donations, if any. Fees are required to purchase a product. Don't go on bitching about something like this when you could put a dev fee in. It's your own fault if you feel you deserve money for work for 'donating' it. NO ONE HAS TO DONATE. Donation expectations should be set at 0. Actually, it was my main source of income, and releasing it with a fee would have caused the same thing - someone taking it apart and ripping out the code. Dude, you don't even look at history before spouting your bullshit. Go look into the history of darkcoin-mod, and what this "community" will do to avoid paying even a 2% fee on a 50% increase. EDIT: Oh, and by the way, you're correct that donations aren't required. But don't you dare bitch when people only sell to large farmers when you never donated a cent. Thanks for the help. It works now 5.9 on 7950 @ 1100/1600
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
December 02, 2014, 12:51:28 PM Last edit: December 02, 2014, 01:03:58 PM by djm34 |
|
Yup and imagine that, a highly desirable product has now been leaked and is pretty much worthless to the author. Too bad you didn't release it with a modest dev fee attached. Instead people got pissed off you were trying to sell it for so much that they don't even consider it a option and there are people trying to resell it themselves for less or outright leaked it. But don't worry, I'm sure no one would've used your custom miner. -_- The problem may-be is that you forgot to donate for sgminer while you should have. Same applies to standard sgminer, someone wrap up the code expecting from users they will donate... he was wrong, some moron thought they didn't have to make donations Donations ARE NOT required. They are given of their free will. What you're talking about is a fee and someone not paying a fee. Don't confuse the two. Donations are not the same as a fee. You are happy if you get donations, if any. Fees are required to purchase a product. Don't go on bitching about something like this when you could put a dev fee in. It's your own fault if you feel you deserve money for work for 'donating' it. NO ONE HAS TO DONATE. Donation expectations should be set at 0. Don't worry, we don't expect a lot, but yourself don't expect anything which could be profitable to you... also don't complain when a gpu dev rape a new coin... as we don't expect anything from you there is no reason to share with you (ie: in that case you are just the competition...) and in that case, we will just release new stuff when it has become unprofitable to us... (well it is a lose-lose situation... but more for you than for us in the no-donation basis). I think you don't understand the implication (for you) of what you wrote... Because we really don't have to share anything at all...
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
qwep1
|
|
December 02, 2014, 01:16:23 PM |
|
sooner or later anyway someone spit
|
|
|
|
|