GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :)

[suchmoon]

<snip>

It will likely result in some bans because someone is downvoting the CEO

But I think this tells us how he can win that bet.

How do you know they are downvoting him? I can see positive points under his comments.

At one point he had -1 on some posts. Even if someone upvoted him since then you can still add up the upvotes in the mouse-over and see if it matches the total. It the total is less than the sum of upvotes - someone had downvoted. But don't worry, this will be fixed:


Edited 2020-11-28 to fix a broken image

[Stargazer]

I see, thanks. It's strange that they allowed people to see who casted the upvotes but not downvotes.

[suchmoon]

I see, thanks. It's strange that they allowed people to see who casted the upvotes but not downvotes.

It's probably a good thing. There would be all sorts of retaliation if they could see who downvoted.

[crashoveride54902]

I see, thanks. It's strange that they allowed people to see who casted the upvotes but not downvotes.

It's probably a good thing. There would be all sorts of retaliation if they could see who downvoted.

i'm still invested in gaw...and so totally confused about hashcoin, but if i can sell all my HC's asap @ hopefully 20 I should hit ROI and maybe some profit not holding my breath for it but would be nice...i still think its gona flop just like every other alt coin has/will

[bitcoinnoisseur]

When calling people out on names pointlessly, it's important to get them right. His name is Homero Josiah.

You're creepy. There's a different name here:
https://twitter.com/gawceo/status/530709608147714048


Did you make this fake picture? The trolling in this thread has no limits. GAW never made the one with "$80 - 100" on it. Nice try.
https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fh04WStE.png&t=546&c=1aP8FmC1VO42yw

I do think I saw some numbers there at one point. That pic got changed a lot in the first few hours. It does have the dates now and I believe those inflated prices were listed sometime shortly before or after the dates were edited in. I could be wrong though.

https://hashcoin.com/img/timeline@2x.png

[MOB]

I am going to see if he will let me take that bet.

I mean, if it is % of ROI in my own specified timelimit, then he cannot win.



Posted in the thread and emailed Josh.



What are the current payouts for Zenpool? What about a Prime that DD's perfectly?

[suchmoon]

I am going to see if he will let me take that bet.

I mean, if it is % of ROI in my own specified timelimit, then he cannot win.



Posted in the thread and emailed Josh.



What are the current payouts for Zenpool? What about a Prime that DD's perfectly?

About 0.00015 after fees. About 0.00035 before fees. That's with DD to Clever or LTC Pool. ZenPool alone today is 0.00024932

[NuShrike]

I am going to see if he will let me take that bet.

I mean, if it is % of ROI in my own specified timelimit, then he cannot win.

And before or after fees? It's house-rules so he will game them.

By previously hosting and converting indie hardware, he's already taken a chunk of the indie competition out.

After all, a 5MH GridSeed performs better than a 5MH Hashlet -- now scale that.

[MOB]

I am going to see if he will let me take that bet.

I mean, if it is % of ROI in my own specified timelimit, then he cannot win.



Posted in the thread and emailed Josh.



What are the current payouts for Zenpool? What about a Prime that DD's perfectly?

About 0.00015 after fees. About 0.00035 before fees. That's with DD to Clever or LTC Pool. ZenPool alone today is 0.00024932

Do Prime's get charged extra maintenance on that DD?


edit: Josh has replied via email again, but without clarifying if he understands or accepts the terms or if he will even take the bet with me.

He just said something about his legal team would need to prepare a draft first, but not if he would actually send that draft to me or anything.

[suchmoon]

I am going to see if he will let me take that bet.

I mean, if it is % of ROI in my own specified timelimit, then he cannot win.



Posted in the thread and emailed Josh.



What are the current payouts for Zenpool? What about a Prime that DD's perfectly?

About 0.00015 after fees. About 0.00035 before fees. That's with DD to Clever or LTC Pool. ZenPool alone today is 0.00024932

Do Prime's get charged extra maintenance on that DD?

No. Maintenance is always 0.08 USD. ~BTC0.0002105 today.

[MOB]

Well, Josh has refused to allow me to bet. What a surprise.

He apparently can at least do enough arithmetic to know that he could never actually win a % to ROI comparison.

[tf315]

Wish I could figure out where they come up with the payouts for the pools. Sometimes they match the pool info, sometimes they don't.

For example, yesterday's waffle number matches the info from the wafflepool website (0.00020943). Clever doesn't - its below the Clever reported number. 0.00023200 on the zen website, 0.000253 on the clever website. Even if they take the number from some other time period it would be tough for it to be that low since the previous day was 0.000247.

[MOB]

Well, Josh has refused to allow me to bet. What a surprise.

He apparently can at least do enough arithmetic to know that he could never actually win a % to ROI comparison.

Are you talking about 100 BTC? He said only cloud mining companies can participate.
Do you really have that much cash? I feel envious. 

Look at the date I joined BitcoinTalk.

It should not matter if I run a cloud miner. This is about comparing investment vehicles, not penises.

[KC6TTR]

BEWARE
He may not accept your bet, but his "legal team" may send you something like this:

[MOB]

It sure is hard to prove that anything anyone could say about GAW is "objectively false," seeing how they operate in a giant unproved black box.

Any cease and desist letter regarding libel would be ludicrous.

[jimmothy]

It sure is hard to prove that anything anyone could say about GAW is "objectively false," seeing how they operate in a giant unproved black box.

Any cease and desist letter regarding libel would be ludicrous.

I agree, this law firm can go fuck themselves. It's nothing more than an illegal attempt at censorship.

What I don't understand is how any "lawyers" can read this thread and not immediately catch whiff of the fraud/illegal practices stemming from GAW.

Seems to me these "lawyers" are just thugs paid to harass anyone with a critical opinion of GAW with the threat of frivolous lawsuits.

[bitcoinnoisseur]

It sure is hard to prove that anything anyone could say about GAW is "objectively false," seeing how they operate in a giant unproved black box.

Any cease and desist letter regarding libel would be ludicrous.

I agree, this law firm can go fuck themselves. It's nothing more than an illegal attempt at censorship.

What I don't understand is how any "lawyers" can read this thread and not immediately catch whiff of the fraud/illegal practices stemming from GAW.

Seems to me these "lawyers" are just thugs paid to harass anyone with a critical opinion of GAW with the threat of frivolous lawsuits.

They know GAW has a lot of money and they will freely take it. GREED IS GOOD. - Gordon Gekko

[MOB]

Josh is now making vague and poorly worded legal threats via email. (and I am shadow banned on HT. Surprise!)

[bitgeek]

It sure is hard to prove that anything anyone could say about GAW is "objectively false," seeing how they operate in a giant unproved black box.

Any cease and desist letter regarding libel would be ludicrous.

I agree, this law firm can go fuck themselves. It's nothing more than an illegal attempt at censorship.

What I don't understand is how any "lawyers" can read this thread and not immediately catch whiff of the fraud/illegal practices stemming from GAW.

Seems to me these "lawyers" are just thugs paid to harass anyone with a critical opinion of GAW with the threat of frivolous lawsuits.

Every spammer and flamer tries to hide himself behind "just stating his opinion". You clearly don't know what criticism is.

[jimmothy]

It sure is hard to prove that anything anyone could say about GAW is "objectively false," seeing how they operate in a giant unproved black box.

Any cease and desist letter regarding libel would be ludicrous.

I agree, this law firm can go fuck themselves. It's nothing more than an illegal attempt at censorship.

What I don't understand is how any "lawyers" can read this thread and not immediately catch whiff of the fraud/illegal practices stemming from GAW.

Seems to me these "lawyers" are just thugs paid to harass anyone with a critical opinion of GAW with the threat of frivolous lawsuits.

Every spammer and flamer tries to hide himself behind "just stating his opinion". You clearly don't know what criticism is.

Clearly you dont understand freedom of speech.