horizontalcareer
Member
 Offline
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
|
 |
February 08, 2015, 05:02:05 AM |
|
This coin is not RD redwind, is redcoin RED. Redwind is not listed in a exchange, Dev is working in that, but first we must have a blockexplorer. Keep calm.  Yeah,RD is not RED. |
|
|
|
|
bitcoinkkk
|
|
February 08, 2015, 11:17:43 AM |
|
This coin is not RD redwind, is redcoin RED. Redwind is not listed in a exchange, Dev is working in that, but first we must have a blockexplorer. Keep calm. Yeah,RD is not RED. ok,Thank！！！ |
|
|
|
|
|
macorcina
|
|
February 09, 2015, 12:15:03 AM |
|
**********************************************************************
2015-Feb-09 01:11:33.343648 [P2P1]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
2015-Feb-09 01:11:45.933699 [P2P6]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
2015-Feb-09 01:11:53.502778 [P2P1]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
Provide valid seed peers please.
|
|
|
|
|
|
bitcoinkkk
|
|
February 09, 2015, 08:03:55 AM
Last edit: February 09, 2015, 08:16:11 AM by bitcoinkkk |
|
**********************************************************************
2015-Feb-09 01:11:33.343648 [P2P1]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
2015-Feb-09 01:11:45.933699 [P2P6]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
2015-Feb-09 01:11:53.502778 [P2P1]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
Provide valid seed peers please.
http://redwind.miner.center/ or 178.63.62.93 DEV this week has not come, may leave. |
|
|
|
|
sine_fuc
Member
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
|
|
February 09, 2015, 10:16:02 AM |
|
**********************************************************************
2015-Feb-09 01:11:33.343648 [P2P1]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
2015-Feb-09 01:11:45.933699 [P2P6]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
2015-Feb-09 01:11:53.502778 [P2P1]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
Provide valid seed peers please.
http://redwind.miner.center/ or 178.63.62.93 DEV this week has not come, may leave. He is online now and then. |
|
|
|
|
bytemuma
|
|
February 09, 2015, 10:21:04 AM |
|
**********************************************************************
2015-Feb-09 01:11:33.343648 [P2P1]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
2015-Feb-09 01:11:45.933699 [P2P6]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
2015-Feb-09 01:11:53.502778 [P2P1]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
Provide valid seed peers please.
http://redwind.miner.center/ or 178.63.62.93 DEV this week has not come, may leave. He is online now and then. Why do you say he is online?  |
|
|
|
sine_fuc
Member
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
|
|
February 09, 2015, 10:22:43 AM |
|
**********************************************************************
2015-Feb-09 01:11:33.343648 [P2P1]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
2015-Feb-09 01:11:45.933699 [P2P6]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
2015-Feb-09 01:11:53.502778 [P2P1]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
Provide valid seed peers please.
http://redwind.miner.center/ or 178.63.62.93 DEV this week has not come, may leave. He is online now and then. Why do you say he is online? Sometimes he is online but not talking. |
|
|
|
Mewtwo
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
ROAD TO HEAVEN...
|
|
February 09, 2015, 10:26:31 AM |
|
I've lost interested in this algo.
For the first, it seems really hard to get started with it.
For the second, users that know how to use it seem to not care about new users and adoption.
Third, btc is already way too hard to understand for the general public, even easy steps as explaining to them how the public ledger updates can't make them understand it at all, and that's why people are trying to simplify it nowadays but at the same time make it safer for the general public to use.
So in the end, i don't see cryptonight succeeding in the nearest future, sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
bytemuma
|
|
February 09, 2015, 10:27:20 AM |
|
In the status account of the Dev says:
Last Active: February 02, 2015, 01:02:02 PM
So, only if is online as a guest or with another account.
|
|
|
|
|
bytemuma
|
|
February 09, 2015, 10:31:16 AM |
|
I've lost interested in this algo.
For the first, it seems really hard to get started with it.
For the second, users that know how to use it seem to not care about new users and adoption.
Third, btc is already way too hard to understand for the general public, even easy steps as explaining to them how the public ledger updates can't make them understand it at all, and that's why people are trying to simplify it nowadays but at the same time make it safer for the general public to use.
So in the end, i don't see cryptonight succeeding in the nearest future, sorry.
Why do you say is hard to get started with it? I can help you, if you tell what is your problem. IMO this is the most fair algo, because anyone with a simple computer cam mine the coin. |
|
|
|
|
MilesJohan
|
|
February 09, 2015, 10:38:23 AM |
|
How is cryptonight a different algorithm from the already existing ones ?
|
MileyJohanson
|
|
|
|
bytemuma
|
|
February 09, 2015, 10:59:50 AM |
|
How is cryptonight a different algorithm from the already existing ones ?
The algo is important, but CryptoNote coins have something that none of the other can achieve right now. Untraceable payments, Unlinkable transactions and Blockchain analysis resistance ALGO: Egalitarian proof of work
The proof of work mechanism is actually a voting system. Users vote for the right order of the transactions, for enabling new features in the protocol and for the honest money supply distribution. Therefore, it is important that during the voting process all participant have equal voting rights. CryptoNote brings the equality with an egalitarian proof-of-work pricing function, which is perfectly suitable for ordinary PCs. It utilizes built-in CPU instructions, which are very hard and too expensive to implement in special purpose devices or fast memory-on-chip devices with low latency.
We propose a new memory-bound algorithm for the proof-of-work pricing function. It relies on random access to a slow memory and emphasizes latency dependence. As opposed to scrypt, every new block (64 bytes in length) depends on all the previous blocks. As a result a hypothetical "memory-saver" should increase his calculation speed exponentially.
Our algorithm requires about 2 Mb per instance for the following reasons:
1. It fits in the L3 cache (per core) of modern processors, which should become mainstream in a few years;
2. A megabyte of internal memory is an almost unacceptable size for a modern ASIC pipeline;
3. GPUs may run hundreds of concurrent instances, but they are limited in other ways: GDDR5 memory is slower than the CPU L3 cache and remarkable for its bandwidth, not random access speed.
4. Significant expansion of the scratchpad would require an increase in iterations, which in turn implies an overall time increase. "Heavy" calls in a trust-less p2p network may lead to serious vulnerabilities, because nodes are obliged to check every new block's proof-of-work. If a node spends a considerable amount of time on each hash evaluation, it can be easily DDoSed by a flood of fake objects with arbitrary work data (nonce values).
One of the proof-of-work algorithms that is in line with our propositions is CryptoNight, created by Bytecoin developers in a cooperation with our team. It is designed to make CPU and GPU mining roughly equally efficient and restrict ASIC mining. https://cryptonote.org/inside/ |
|
|
|
|
bitcoinkkk
|
|
February 09, 2015, 11:25:16 AM |
|
**********************************************************************
2015-Feb-09 01:11:33.343648 [P2P1]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
2015-Feb-09 01:11:45.933699 [P2P6]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
2015-Feb-09 01:11:53.502778 [P2P1]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
Provide valid seed peers please.
http://redwind.miner.center/ or 178.63.62.93 DEV this week has not come, may leave. He is online now and then. Why do you say he is online? Sometimes he is online but not talking. Launch a many month, but no progress， Group technology is not good enough， Should be to leave. |
|
|
|
|
sine_fuc
Member
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
|
|
February 09, 2015, 11:53:38 AM |
|
I've lost interested in this algo.
For the first, it seems really hard to get started with it.
For the second, users that know how to use it seem to not care about new users and adoption.
Third, btc is already way too hard to understand for the general public, even easy steps as explaining to them how the public ledger updates can't make them understand it at all, and that's why people are trying to simplify it nowadays but at the same time make it safer for the general public to use.
So in the end, i don't see cryptonight succeeding in the nearest future, sorry.
IMO this is the most fair algo, because anyone with a simple computer cam mine the coin. True. CN algo is still the fairest algo,not cracked by aisc or fpga. |
|
|
|
|
bytemuma
|
|
February 09, 2015, 12:35:10 PM |
|
I've lost interested in this algo.
For the first, it seems really hard to get started with it.
For the second, users that know how to use it seem to not care about new users and adoption.
Third, btc is already way too hard to understand for the general public, even easy steps as explaining to them how the public ledger updates can't make them understand it at all, and that's why people are trying to simplify it nowadays but at the same time make it safer for the general public to use.
So in the end, i don't see cryptonight succeeding in the nearest future, sorry.
IMO this is the most fair algo, because anyone with a simple computer cam mine the coin. True. CN algo is still the fairest algo,not cracked by aisc or fpga. Let's mine this coin, and wait the development of all CryptoNote coins. I'm only investing in Cryptonote coins, the technology is completely different and much more evolved from bitcoin´s and is forks. But right now is only in is infancy, let´s became early adopters. |
|
|
|
|
macorcina
|
|
February 09, 2015, 01:06:30 PM |
|
**********************************************************************
2015-Feb-09 01:11:33.343648 [P2P1]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
2015-Feb-09 01:11:45.933699 [P2P6]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
2015-Feb-09 01:11:53.502778 [P2P1]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
Provide valid seed peers please.
http://redwind.miner.center/ or 178.63.62.93 DEV this week has not come, may leave. not work. i need valid peer , like ip: \port number 178.63.62.93 and what is the port number ? |
|
|
|
|
|
nikos64
|
|
February 09, 2015, 03:32:53 PM |
|
**********************************************************************
2015-Feb-09 01:11:33.343648 [P2P1]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
2015-Feb-09 01:11:45.933699 [P2P6]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
2015-Feb-09 01:11:53.502778 [P2P1]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
Provide valid seed peers please.
http://redwind.miner.center/ or 178.63.62.93 DEV this week has not come, may leave. not work. i need valid peer , like ip: \port number 178.63.62.93 and what is the port number ? 178.63.62.93:61280 46.12.19.197:61280 |
|
|
|
|
|
bitcoinkkk
|
|
February 10, 2015, 07:43:57 AM |
|
**********************************************************************
2015-Feb-09 01:11:33.343648 [P2P1]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
2015-Feb-09 01:11:45.933699 [P2P6]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
2015-Feb-09 01:11:53.502778 [P2P1]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
Provide valid seed peers please.
http://redwind.miner.center/ or 178.63.62.93 DEV this week has not come, may leave. not work. i need valid peer , like ip: \port number 178.63.62.93 and what is the port number ? 178.63.62.93:61280 46.12.19.197:61280 Development has been left, don't mining |
|
|
|
|
sine_fuc
Member
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
|
|
February 10, 2015, 07:53:17 AM |
|
**********************************************************************
2015-Feb-09 01:11:33.343648 [P2P1]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
2015-Feb-09 01:11:45.933699 [P2P6]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
2015-Feb-09 01:11:53.502778 [P2P1]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
Provide valid seed peers please.
http://redwind.miner.center/ or 178.63.62.93 DEV this week has not come, may leave. not work. i need valid peer , like ip: \port number 178.63.62.93 and what is the port number ? 178.63.62.93:61280 46.12.19.197:61280 Development has been left, don't mining Probably~ |
|
|
|
|
bytemuma
|
|
February 10, 2015, 10:35:45 AM |
|
**********************************************************************
2015-Feb-09 01:11:33.343648 [P2P1]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
2015-Feb-09 01:11:45.933699 [P2P6]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
2015-Feb-09 01:11:53.502778 [P2P1]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds
Provide valid seed peers please.
http://redwind.miner.center/ or 178.63.62.93 DEV this week has not come, may leave. not work. i need valid peer , like ip: \port number 178.63.62.93 and what is the port number ? 178.63.62.93:61280 46.12.19.197:61280 Development has been left, don't mining You must do what you think is best for you. The hash rate is increasing, so i think there is a few more miners in the coin. |
|
|
|
|
