Armory 0.93 testing release! (with 0.05 BTC bug bounty)

[goatpig]

Yeah it should crash instead. That throw is handled too gracefully.

[1713895236]

1713895236

[1713895236]

1713895236

[justusranvier]

It does fail at block 161352 every time.

[justusranvier]

That block is present:

Code:

$ bitcoin-cli getblockhash 161352
00000000000001b06ca92a86d168d11525dd6868690ad601cf453582750d6d5b

$ bitcoin-cli getblock 00000000000001b06ca92a86d168d11525dd6868690ad601cf453582750d6d5b

{
    "hash" : "00000000000001b06ca92a86d168d11525dd6868690ad601cf453582750d6d5b",
    "confirmations" : 178563,
    "size" : 10274,
    "height" : 161352,
    "version" : 1,
    "merkleroot" : "71fc1f32d7c40333872800801270fc6119e66a8e2eb3ac1e117b016378c3bd6c",
    "tx" : [
        "750f6786dd6b197341873956a1c2f72eac5885dea39f888def891158a4be83fe",
        "ef3ba9761f838db8f891c38a12e8cf918252439fe9dc6cc098554607f98a060f",
        "430483c55f60afd74f97f33d047f23e823f140eae3767ff91a70979bb3f7d563",
        "fdfced841e0a38b7bdb4a14785d0f0bbe6c0c274d1fc3f9096d12fa1c140a91a",
        "de26dcfe7ce13ccdafeb2efb434db4ef9176c1e48705bca07e26dab262a9b6eb",
        "60e1b38b550a9671de2304e05d88d0c867d02e7a8b83e3a5ee89e4eaed969b2e",
        "bd8b0c3c3bee955218f59c103a37f946b77e48d7858b4c6140c23ded0548264e",
        "e0eb0fe4b6db08764b481875d70b2657a31903e222f85a70a3ce043a825b601f",
        "75573387681c7c094f6d5e2c7dd27c4d685e44d630a462eb4661e803c234d553",
        "087ef5a0cada7e423b7ce95913bdf03aac1ce027bfb227d019cf74c87dc9df75",
        "9eb4a039e2483cc9691be9fa24c9afd5d63049d4b71616f5b37de962197ec519",
        "155ad81aee29d314b5d29f65b5898ed6130cc2e178338c2c473b6552f9f5752f",
        "6fffac9877c666422641a2c9d13ecbb620c48a774de113c003dfcdff5bded9fe",
        "1479889653b4bb7ae2eb03ac74264e305a986e5b50459dcbebe2f948e82962b5",
        "f8d68d38e71f0ac8babedc9768cbb9a3606cee380470e17c2d9911c5378877ef",
        "a89e10073dacc27f437903ec299a8fe02b4cfd3f853cfa68035379efccd99cfe",
        "6360d4a266a270280d8b4e768de8655816c34ab6705cb2a5be67b7e232009659",
        "880f9b2da2aa155f0ad7c19d349292c29474e88361d7645cd771bfc34d758bc2",
        "386fb9f2480a0074487b091236edd56a7a17dca6c902cbc5abc180bdd002e535",
        "1f6bd7f7b3eeb0504e09f18bd1e83ea1ac9e847f8bb54991bf6f7e70f4e418c9"
    ],
    "time" : 1326086768,
    "nonce" : 148885393,
    "bits" : "1a0d69d7",
    "difficulty" : 1250757.73927466,
    "chainwork" : "00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000b2ce69723a41929b7",
    "previousblockhash" : "00000000000004754688e78ddfd1caa9ccbd3750dbc28389efc4bbc4496197ae",
    "nextblockhash" : "0000000000000774676c1436f6fe5626273c98d841f9328ed069bdc4fe829d90"
}

[justusranvier]

On the plus side, the scanning process is very fast (until it stops unexpectedly).

[goatpig]

This is very odd, I'd like to observe that issue first hand. Could you send me your first 14-15 block files? (I expect your first 165xxx blocks to be covered by that few files)

[justusranvier]

Could you send me your first 14-15 block files? (I expect your first 165xxx blocks to be covered by that few files)

What's the best way to transfer files of that size?

[goatpig]

Could you send me your first 14-15 block files? (I expect your first 165xxx blocks to be covered by that few files)

What's the best way to transfer files of that size?

easiest to set up would be FTP or torrent I guess. XDCC/fserve over IRC isnt too hard either. Maybe Mega allows for several 128mb files?

[jammers]

I've used large files asap for sending gigabyte files

[etotheipi]

I've used https://www.wetransfer.com/ before and it's pretty solid.   Don't know much about it other than it's free up to 2GB.

[zombieslayer9099]

0.92.99.3 is coming either today or tomorrow, correct?
I need the HDD opts ASAP

[etotheipi]

0.92.99.3 is coming either today or tomorrow, correct?
I need the HDD opts ASAP

Should be tonight.  We're wrapping up a bunch of the bugfixes and intermediate testing.

[zombieslayer9099]

Should be tonight.  We're wrapping up a bunch of the bugfixes and intermediate testing.

I'm very happy to hear that

[goatpig]

I've used https://www.wetransfer.com/ before and it's pretty solid.   Don't know much about it other than it's free up to 2GB.

Right I forgot about these guys. That's what we used last time someone uploaded us some block files

[bitpop]

.3 very fast but transactions no longer show

[Carlton Banks]

0.92.99.3

• On armory github in the Tags section, both .zip and .tar.gz of Testing-0.92.99.3 are, in fact, the source to 0.92.3
• Less than 30 minutes to build Db and scan it
• Dozens of tx's fail to appear once the Db/scan is complete

Also, 0.92.99.3 tried to append a brand new Db to the Db file that 0.92.99.2 had created. No need to mention whether or not that worked out.

[goatpig]

• Dozens of tx's fail to appear once the Db/scan is complete

.3 very fast but transactions no longer show

play with the wallet filter, should display the transactions.

[bitpop]

• Dozens of tx's fail to appear once the Db/scan is complete

.3 very fast but transactions no longer show

play with the wallet filter, should display the transactions.

Didn't help

0 balances, no transactions

[goatpig]

Did you delete the DB from the previous version? They share the same file names so LMDB would append the new DB to the old one, and that would conflict.

[etotheipi]

• On armory github in the Tags section, both .zip and .tar.gz of Testing-0.92.99.3 are, in fact, the source to 0.92.3

Okay, so my release scripts apparently botched the git tagging process.  It appears it checked out and signed the master (default) branch, instead of the testing branch.  Whoops.  I have already deleted that tag from the repo, and will make sure it's done right when we do .4

As for all the other problems mentioned here... we haven't seen that here.  We have a lot of addresses and wallets loaded, and everything looks accurate except the "Custom Filter" is broken.  However, I also manually deleted the databases folder between loads... as I've been testing build&scan speed a lot.  Have you tried manually deleting that folder?  (hopefully this is just a .2 to .3 upgrade issue)

[Carlton Banks]

Yes, I tried manually deleting & then re-building the Db using 0.92.99.3. Select addresses from a given wallet appear, but others do not. I'm not sure how the culling is determined, there's no obvious pattern at a glance.

No such problems with 0.92.99.2