♦♦♦♦♦♦[ANN]♦♦MTR♦♦MasterTraderCoin♦♦10.4m♦♦TOSHIDESK LLC♦♦ETNA Partnership♦♦♦♦♦♦

[kubuminer]

guys sent any hash on our pool. thanks

[JuanHungLo]

Suprnova is up

Is that him?

The king has arrived!

=)

Thanks for your support,

MasterTrader777

Well, judging from this post, it wasn't a mistake.  Perhaps an error in communication?

[robmob]

Just like the other shit coins watch this have a quick ending. I am DONE with this coin and refuse to help out via social media or in any other way as I was lied to. Why is the POW running this is BS

[qwep]

Why do some of this users feel like they are being lied to, last time i check the crowdfunding has an escrow [ognasty],
i ratter like the decision to have pow an not have to buy into the crowdfunding with out a taste of the wallet and the coin.

i get it that 2 people are upset and they become negative to the end, but their is only 10,000  mtr in pow at one block a coin.

[qwep]

Just like the other shit coins watch this have a quick ending. I am DONE with this coin and refuse to help out via social media or in any other way as I was lied to. Why is the POW running this is BS

Agreed. There are the following options:
1) that the whole thing was a scam and the dev has taken phase one 15 BTC and ran
2) he wanted to create a market to dump as much premine as possible
3) he is just plain stupid to realise the implications of what he has done to break trust in this way after being super professional and being an example of a dev up to this point
4) he has some brilliant amazing excuse that explains everything and all will be forgiven (highly unlikely and has to be **** good reason.)
5) make as if he has done nothing wrong and delete all the upset posts

Dev can the phase 1 and partial phase 2 investors get their money back? or at least hand the coins out to dump on the 1st exchange? Seems dev has gone offline and is not present to answer the questions.

@OgNasty can you confirm if the ICO funds are still in escrow with you or have you paid it over already?

simple task follow the crowdfunding wallet you deposit at https://blockchain.info/address/1BuyMTRxuoUdAiwijwLMLC9giq7aVRF2bD if you did invest on phase 1 .

[Argwai96]

Im so upset i didnt got to see this in till yesterday!, the facts are the cost per coin mining right now is 10x from what the phase 1 sold, with 1ghz you only get around 200 coins.

 

[Argwai96]

Im so upset i didnt got to see this in till yesterday!, the facts are the cost per coin mining right now is 10x from what the phase 1 sold, with 1ghz you only get around 200 coins.

 

I think everyone is upset, even phase 1 holders because trust has been broken.

your trust maybe, i was just checking out the profile of the escrow agent and hes pretty high rank, now im just going to buy on phase 2 is completely cheaper then pow right now.

[jc12345]

Im so upset i didnt got to see this in till yesterday!, the facts are the cost per coin mining right now is 10x from what the phase 1 sold, with 1ghz you only get around 200 coins.

 

I think everyone is upset, even phase 1 holders because trust has been broken.

your trust maybe, i was just checking out the profile of the escrow agent and hes pretty high rank, now im just going to buy on phase 2 is completely cheaper then pow right now.

You can operate as you wish, and accept what you want based on your principles, but do you realise that everyone will be thinking the same way that it is cheaper to buy phase 2 than to mine. People could be pumping BTC into phase 2 up to break even point. This means that lets say 100BTC is put into phase 2 then each coin costs 200k sats. If mining costs 300k sats, then break even would be 150 BTC. This might be the reason for the dev to have done the ninja move, in order make phase 2 very expensive and raise a very large pool of BTC. It is clever, but unethical nonetheless. Phase 2 will end roughly in line with POW so there will be very little time to do accurate calculations in the end about what is cheaper - phase 2 or POW.

[donnyespo]

I mean I really don't think we should be bent out of shape...

Did we expect POW to start after Phase 2 yes.

So really the only thing this might do is create more interest for the ICO which then would make the distrubtion of the coin at a higher price. Just remember only 15 btc in the first phase.

Launch went smooth, wallet works just fine.

Ive been in shitter situations for sure.

[Gumbork]

I mean I really don't think we should be bent out of shape...

Did we expect POW to start after Phase 2 yes.

So really the only thing this might do is create more interest for the ICO which then would make the distrubtion of the coin at a higher price. Just remember only 15 btc in the first phase.

Launch went smooth, wallet works just fine.

Ive been in shitter situations for sure.

Maybe it is not the end of the world and everything will work out. Even if phase 1 make 10 BTC each, it is still a matter of principle. It seems that we are still a long way from operating ethical in crypto. O well.

Completely understand everyone's position here, at the current moment i couldn't be any happier with a x10 growth on my phase 1 investment, if we get to the bottom line is we invested to make money and b/c we like the idea the dev put together.

[RhodaGila]

Really want to hear an explanation of this situation

[Gumbork]

Really want to hear an explanation of this situation

I think an explanation would go to MTR supporters not the random forum, like how phase 1 investors got a very nice details email of their investment.

[donnyespo]

I mean I really don't think we should be bent out of shape...

Did we expect POW to start after Phase 2 yes.

So really the only thing this might do is create more interest for the ICO which then would make the distrubtion of the coin at a higher price. Just remember only 15 btc in the first phase.

Launch went smooth, wallet works just fine.

Ive been in shitter situations for sure.

Maybe it is not the end of the world and everything will work out. Even if phase 1 make 10 BTC each, it is still a matter of principle. It seems that we are still a long way from operating ethical in crypto and until people start operating with principles crypto will remain a **** hole where everyone is out for his own profit and it doesn't matter how the profit is obtained. O well.

I see your point and agree. Lets see what the dev has to say. Things can def be worse, but is still a little concerning.

[jc12345]

Really want to hear an explanation of this situation

I think the answer will be that the dev wanted to have unit cost of mining and unit cost of ICO in sync, thereby raising a significantly higher phase 2 ICO amount of BTC.

[Gumbork]

I mean I really don't think we should be bent out of shape...

Did we expect POW to start after Phase 2 yes.

So really the only thing this might do is create more interest for the ICO which then would make the distrubtion of the coin at a higher price. Just remember only 15 btc in the first phase.

Launch went smooth, wallet works just fine.

Ive been in shitter situations for sure.

Maybe it is not the end of the world and everything will work out. Even if phase 1 make 10 BTC each, it is still a matter of principle. It seems that we are still a long way from operating ethical in crypto. O well.

Completely understand everyone's position here, at the current moment i couldn't be any happier with a x10 growth on my phase 1 investment, if we get to the bottom line is we invested to make money and b/c we like the idea the dev put together.

Yes, every phase 1 investor will be very happy with the profit, it is just how the profit is obtained that is a problem. It is possible to make a lot of money in life by lying and/or cheating but that does not make it right.

Im sure the dev would make a statement about it, what i see is you getting really emotional on your possible thoughts, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=954240.msg10568042#msg10568042
wait in till the dev makes their statement and take it from there.

[Gumbork]

Really want to hear an explanation of this situation

I think the answer will be that the dev wanted to have unit cost of mining and unit cost of ICO in sync, thereby raising a significantly higher phase 2 ICO amount of BTC.

is funny to see you quoting someone that hasn't even posted in the complete forum over a month nor it supports MTR.

[jc12345]

Really want to hear an explanation of this situation

I think the answer will be that the dev wanted to have unit cost of mining and unit cost of ICO in sync, thereby raising a significantly higher phase 2 ICO amount of BTC.

is funny to see you quoting someone that hasn't even posted in the complete forum over a month nor it supports MTR.

Is that a pre-requisite to quote someone's post? and yes I am emotional because the dev seemed to be a fresh breeze. Also I hate ninja moves.

[Gumbork]

Really want to hear an explanation of this situation

I think the answer will be that the dev wanted to have unit cost of mining and unit cost of ICO in sync, thereby raising a significantly higher phase 2 ICO amount of BTC.

is funny to see you quoting someone that hasn't even posted in the complete forum over a month nor it supports MTR.

Is that a pre-requisite to quote someone's post?

of course specially when your giving an answer to a development your not even a part of, your that emotional right now that you want to answer others peoples comments that are clear none supporters, that just hurting your own phase 1 investment. im not even 100% sure you even invested on phase 1 at this point!

[RhodaGila]

Really want to hear an explanation of this situation

I think the answer will be that the dev wanted to have unit cost of mining and unit cost of ICO in sync, thereby raising a significantly higher phase 2 ICO amount of BTC.

is funny to see you quoting someone that hasn't even posted in the complete forum over a month nor it supports MTR.

Am I wrong if I ask?
Very funny to see people who commented for assessing a person from when he posts, funny...
See, there I am not quoting posts from anyone, I just want an explanation of dev, because I am interested in this coin, that's all.

[Gumbork]

Really want to hear an explanation of this situation

I think the answer will be that the dev wanted to have unit cost of mining and unit cost of ICO in sync, thereby raising a significantly higher phase 2 ICO amount of BTC.

is funny to see you quoting someone that hasn't even posted in the complete forum over a month nor it supports MTR.

Am I wrong if I ask?
Very funny to see people who commented for assessing a person from when he posts, funny...
See, there I am not quoting posts from anyone, I just want an explanation of dev, because I am interested in this coin, that's all.

interested, lmao dude look at your posting history.


edit: i wouldn't be surprise if this is you jc12345