DaDice.com - Next Gen Social Gambling Dice Experience | Progressive Jackpot

[XinXan]

As far as im concerned new business require new btc talk accounts. and as for the investment side of dadice, NO ONE FORCES ANY ONE TO INVEST. whats wrong with all you haters out there trying to ruin good things with no proof of any scamming or violation to other peoples btc. Because of you whiners who have nothing better to do than troll complete bullshit dadice has been forced to close their investment feature. Who cares about posting cold wallets etc it doesnt mean jack. even other dicesites and casinos can do a runner with every ones money with out warning, it doesnt matter where you invest or play if your willing to invest you have to be willing to lose your investment its as simple as that. with all the money invested in making dadice running with a few hundred btc's wouldnt make sense whats the point in putting all the effort and time into something to get up and run???

It doesnt mean jack? So if i ask for investments for any purpose and i say i have 300 bitcoins already and someone that wanted to invest comes to me and asks for proof of that money and i tell him i wont show it, how does that make look?

[1715240427]

1715240427

[1715240427]

1715240427

[1715240427]

1715240427

[1715240427]

1715240427

[1715240427]

1715240427

[1715240427]

1715240427

[Da_Dice_Staff]

As far as im concerned new business require new btc talk accounts. and as for the investment side of dadice, NO ONE FORCES ANY ONE TO INVEST. whats wrong with all you haters out there trying to ruin good things with no proof of any scamming or violation to other peoples btc. Because of you whiners who have nothing better to do than troll complete bullshit dadice has been forced to close their investment feature. Who cares about posting cold wallets etc it doesnt mean jack. even other dicesites and casinos can do a runner with every ones money with out warning, it doesnt matter where you invest or play if your willing to invest you have to be willing to lose your investment its as simple as that. with all the money invested in making dadice running with a few hundred btc's wouldnt make sense whats the point in putting all the effort and time into something to get up and run???

It doesnt mean jack? So if i ask for investments for any purpose and i say i have 300 bitcoins already and someone that wanted to invest comes to me and asks for proof of that money and i tell him i wont show it, how does that make look?

Once again, As DaDice has closed the investments off to the public this point is now moot. Continued harping on the fact is nothing more than a case of FUD. Please read the official statement made earlier for clarification

[NLNico]

- Can I see proof of solvency please?
> No, because of <shit false excuses>.
- Your reasons are false because of <arguments>. Please still prove it.
> No, because you can't tell me how to run a business.
- But all invest sites prove their solvency and it's so easy for you to prove and keep your good reputation.
> No, I will not prove that I have the funds I claim I have, even though it only takes me an hour to do so. Instead, I will close investments so your "point is now moot".

Seriously? xD And people still defend them?!? Lololol.

Anyone with at least a little bit of a brain and who has been around at least a few months in the bitcoin community - should be able to see how fucked up this situation is. Obviously DaDice never had the 500+ coins and therefor either way was going to scam (by directly stealing BR or getting relatively big profit shares) - just like many other dice sites did including dice.ninja for 2k coins.

But yeh guys, keep doing a great job by defending + promoting(signatures) dice sites that lie to us about crucial things like their bankroll amount. Keep justifying it in your head that it's okay because "they didn't scam yet", even though this lie is so obvious and seriously wrong. Guess you really need the money.

[Quickseller]

Seriously? xD And people still defend them?!? Lololol.

Most of the people defending them are either clearly shill accounts or are wearing DaDice signatures. I don't want to make any claims that I cannot backup, however I know that GAW had a signature campaign in which they had many shill accounts pretend to participate in their signature campaign to push their agenda.

[Da_Dice_Staff]

- Can I see proof of solvency please?
> No, because of <shit false excuses>.
- Your reasons are false because of <arguments>. Please still prove it.
> No, because you can't tell me how to run a business.
- But all invest sites prove their solvency and it's so easy for you to prove and keep your good reputation.
> No, I will not prove that I have the funds I claim I have, even though it only takes me an hour to do so. Instead, I will close investments so your "point is now moot".

Seriously? xD And people still defend them?!? Lololol.

Anyone with at least a little bit of a brain and who has been around at least a few months in the bitcoin community - should be able to see how fucked up this situation is. Obviously DaDice never had the 500+ coins and therefor either way was going to scam (by directly stealing BR or getting relatively big profit shares) - just like many other dice sites did including dice.ninja for 2k coins.

But yeh guys, keep doing a great job by defending + promoting(signatures) dice sites that lie to us about crucial things like their bankroll amount. Keep justifying it in your head that it's okay because "they didn't scam yet", even though this lie is so obvious and seriously wrong. Guess you really need the money.

The proof is in the pudding as it were. Check back in a couple of months and see if we have scammed anybody. I believe (in my personal capacity and not as staff) that you will find it is the other way around

[burnzydog]

why keep harping on about it? investment side of dd has closed and the dice site is still growing daily. happy days

[dominicg]

why keep harping on about it? investment side of dd has closed and the dice site is still growing daily. happy days

Its just some people love to criticize somepne

[dooglus]

Again the investor option has been REMOVED. No one is being forced or coerce and indeed we have bowed to public pressure in this regard

I think you misunderstood the public pressure:

* Nobody was asking you to remove the investor option.

* Everyone was asking you to prove that you aren't insolvent.

It is worrying that you have hidden an important part of your site in an attempt to make the public pressure go away rather than simply showing that you still have control of the coins you were trusted to look after.

Offering 20 BTC payouts with a 1% edge from a 500 BTC bankroll that you actually have is bad enough.

Offering 20 BTC payouts with a 1% edge from a 500 BTC bankroll that you already spent is even worse.

[ajareselde]

Seriously? xD And people still defend them?!? Lololol.

Most of the people defending them are either clearly shill accounts or are wearing DaDice signatures. I don't want to make any claims that I cannot backup, however I know that GAW had a signature campaign in which they had many shill accounts pretend to participate in their signature campaign to push their agenda.

Here's a counter question; when did bit-x pass independent financial audit ? Never. But still you are supporting them in their adv. campaign.

[dooglus]

Here's a counter question; when did bit-x pass independed financial audit ?

Here's another; what did you have for breakfast today?

But can we please try to keep this on-topic? If bit-x have been asked for a proof of solvency and in response made a bunch of weak attempts to avoid the question, then that's a matter for their thread. It's nothing to do with the question at hand.

[ajareselde]

Here's a counter question; when did bit-x pass independed financial audit ?

Here's another; what did you have for breakfast today?

But can we please try to keep this on-topic? If bit-x have been asked for a proof of solvency and in response made a bunch of weak attempts to avoid the question, then that's a matter for their thread. It's nothing to do with the question at hand.

I was making a point that just because you have someones adv. in signature, doesnt mean you are their shill account. And you can not judge someone just because they dont want to do what you ask them to.
Its funny that most of people attacking dadice are competitor sites that are loosing customers to rival. Just an observation

[Quickseller]

Seriously? xD And people still defend them?!? Lololol.

Most of the people defending them are either clearly shill accounts or are wearing DaDice signatures. I don't want to make any claims that I cannot backup, however I know that GAW had a signature campaign in which they had many shill accounts pretend to participate in their signature campaign to push their agenda.

Here's a counter question; when did bit-x pass independent financial audit ? Never. But still you are supporting them in their adv. campaign.

I think your statement only backs up what I was implying. I would agree with what Dooglus said above.  I am also not sticking up for bit-x against any claims about them, I have actually been quite critical of them in the past.

I am just pointing out that the people sticking up for DaDice are wearing their signature. Is this just by chance? IDK, maybe, it is too soon to say now. I do know that when dicebitco.in was closing, they didn't have people sticking up for them and they had a signature campaign.

[Quickseller]

Here's a counter question; when did bit-x pass independed financial audit ?

Here's another; what did you have for breakfast today?

But can we please try to keep this on-topic? If bit-x have been asked for a proof of solvency and in response made a bunch of weak attempts to avoid the question, then that's a matter for their thread. It's nothing to do with the question at hand.

I was making a point that just because you have someones adv. in signature, doesnt mean you are their shill account. And you can not judge someone just because they dont want to do what you ask them to.
Its funny that most of people attacking dadice are competitor sites that are loosing customers to rival. Just an observation

DaDice is mostly paying out dust amounts to their customers. Mostly less then .01 per withdrawal (more then 99% of withdrawals by my casual observation). I would hardly call that taking business from their competition.

[ajareselde]

Here's a counter question; when did bit-x pass independed financial audit ?

Here's another; what did you have for breakfast today?

But can we please try to keep this on-topic? If bit-x have been asked for a proof of solvency and in response made a bunch of weak attempts to avoid the question, then that's a matter for their thread. It's nothing to do with the question at hand.

I was making a point that just because you have someones adv. in signature, doesnt mean you are their shill account. And you can not judge someone just because they dont want to do what you ask them to.
Its funny that most of people attacking dadice are competitor sites that are loosing customers to rival. Just an observation

DaDice is mostly paying out dust amounts to their customers. Mostly less then .01 per withdrawal (more then 99% of withdrawals by my casual observation). I would hardly call that taking business from their competition.

you are saying that just-dice pays much more than that ? I don't think so.

[Quickseller]

Here's a counter question; when did bit-x pass independed financial audit ?

Here's another; what did you have for breakfast today?

But can we please try to keep this on-topic? If bit-x have been asked for a proof of solvency and in response made a bunch of weak attempts to avoid the question, then that's a matter for their thread. It's nothing to do with the question at hand.

I was making a point that just because you have someones adv. in signature, doesnt mean you are their shill account. And you can not judge someone just because they dont want to do what you ask them to.
Its funny that most of people attacking dadice are competitor sites that are loosing customers to rival. Just an observation

DaDice is mostly paying out dust amounts to their customers. Mostly less then .01 per withdrawal (more then 99% of withdrawals by my casual observation). I would hardly call that taking business from their competition.

you are saying that just-dice pays much more than that ? I don't think so.

just-dice routinely pays 1+ BTC withdrawals. It wasn't long ago that someone withdrew roughly 100 BTC from their site.

DaDice is not paying out large amounts because large amounts are not being played at their site.

[tspacepilot]

Here's a counter question; when did bit-x pass independed financial audit ?

Here's another; what did you have for breakfast today?

But can we please try to keep this on-topic? If bit-x have been asked for a proof of solvency and in response made a bunch of weak attempts to avoid the question, then that's a matter for their thread. It's nothing to do with the question at hand.

I was making a point that just because you have someones adv. in signature, doesnt mean you are their shill account. And you can not judge someone just because they dont want to do what you ask them to.
Its funny that most of people attacking dadice are competitor sites that are loosing customers to rival. Just an observation

DaDice is mostly paying out dust amounts to their customers. Mostly less then .01 per withdrawal (more then 99% of withdrawals by my casual observation). I would hardly call that taking business from their competition.

Quickseller has a well-known agenda against dadice, as you can see by looking back through his post history and that of his alt ACCTSeller.  You have to take his arguments here with a grain of salt.

[Quickseller]

Here's a counter question; when did bit-x pass independed financial audit ?

Here's another; what did you have for breakfast today?

But can we please try to keep this on-topic? If bit-x have been asked for a proof of solvency and in response made a bunch of weak attempts to avoid the question, then that's a matter for their thread. It's nothing to do with the question at hand.

I was making a point that just because you have someones adv. in signature, doesnt mean you are their shill account. And you can not judge someone just because they dont want to do what you ask them to.
Its funny that most of people attacking dadice are competitor sites that are loosing customers to rival. Just an observation

DaDice is mostly paying out dust amounts to their customers. Mostly less then .01 per withdrawal (more then 99% of withdrawals by my casual observation). I would hardly call that taking business from their competition.

Quickseller has a well-known agenda against dadice, as you can see by looking back through his post history and that of his alt ACCTSeller.  You have to take his arguments here with a grain of salt.

I have no agenda. What would you think my motivations would be against DaDice would be? They paid me several weeks to wear their signature and almost always gave me the highest bonus amount. I made over 1 BTC wearing their signature, maybe two. If anything I think outsiders would claim that I would have a sympathetic bias towards DaDice.

Edit: another reason why I should have a sympathetic bias towards DaDice is that their high paying signature campaign is going to add value to the accounts that it is often claimed that I am farming. And if they were to close then the accounts that is always being claimed that I am farming would decline in value dramatically.

[ClevaRookie]

I always thought that the BTC community was there to support newbies in the industry. Yet all I have encountered is a bunch of bullies who try to make other people run their businesses they want them to. If an investor says they do not want things made available to the public, what business is it of someone else to tell them otherwise?

I find it abhorrent that you guys yell scam at every opportunity you get. Why not give someone the benefit of the doubt for once? I realize there have been many scams in the past, but this does not give you the right to yell wolf at every opportunity.

Since they have closed down their investment side, I do not see why it is necessary to keep bashing people over the head with the same thing over and over again. Give them the opportunity to show you they are not a scam. Act like grown ups, and atop throwing your toys out of the cot because someone does not do business your way.

[dadice]

why keep harping on about it? investment side of dd has closed and the dice site is still growing daily. happy days

Its just some people love to criticize somepne

That why this forum is called Troll Central over at reddit

[ajareselde]

Here's a counter question; when did bit-x pass independed financial audit ?

Here's another; what did you have for breakfast today?

But can we please try to keep this on-topic? If bit-x have been asked for a proof of solvency and in response made a bunch of weak attempts to avoid the question, then that's a matter for their thread. It's nothing to do with the question at hand.

I was making a point that just because you have someones adv. in signature, doesnt mean you are their shill account. And you can not judge someone just because they dont want to do what you ask them to.
Its funny that most of people attacking dadice are competitor sites that are loosing customers to rival. Just an observation

What competition? They don't have any real gamblers. All their ~150M bets is dust of 1 to 100 satoshis from faucet. We are concerned because another scam will hurt whole community. Not because someone is afraid of competition. NLNilco or Quickseller don't have a casino, as well as several other members.

Look, another competing site comment.
Look guys, im not saying you dont have the right to ask for info, but you are making it in a way that makes them guilty no matter what. First it was their investment option, now when they closed it down, its something else.

But hey, ignore me, im wearing their sig. so i must be their shill account. right?