Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 08:59:57 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 [321] 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 ... 1348 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It  (Read 3916326 times)
ianp
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 04, 2013, 02:20:11 PM
 #6401


Its a fansite and it hasn't been updated since a month.. (just like the charts on the last tab, also not my website)


I don't want to derail the current discussion started by aahzmundus, but I have a quick question.

I"m curious how you derive the hashrate on your site (which is amazing, by the way.)

I have no interest in doing this myself, I'm just curious how it works. Is it some sort of factor of difficulty and blocks per hour?

Ian

Edit -- Nevermind, I found a good explanation here: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Difficulty
1714078797
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714078797

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714078797
Reply with quote  #2

1714078797
Report to moderator
"The nature of Bitcoin is such that once version 0.1 was released, the core design was set in stone for the rest of its lifetime." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714078797
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714078797

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714078797
Reply with quote  #2

1714078797
Report to moderator
daemondazz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 04, 2013, 02:22:00 PM
 #6402

What is the red box under each transaction showing? Is it the difference between the input and the output excluding change, in which case, adding those up comes to about 384k?

Computers, Amateur Radio, Electronics, Aviation - 1dazzrAbMqNu6cUwh2dtYckNygG7jKs8S
Rival
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 502



View Profile
June 04, 2013, 02:44:13 PM
 #6403

Are my assumptions wrong?  Did I fuck up and miss a transaction in this spreadsheet? 

Friedcat would probably not send dividend confirmations for any shares owned by either ASICMiner or BitFountain. I mean, why would he (they)?
aahzmundus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500


Invest & Earn: https://cloudthink.io


View Profile
June 04, 2013, 02:49:35 PM
 #6404

Are my assumptions wrong?  Did I fuck up and miss a transaction in this spreadsheet? 

Friedcat would probably not send dividend confirmations for any shares owned by either ASICMiner or BitFountain. I mean, why would he (they)?

I agree, but currently we are under the impression that 400,000 shares exist, and >160,000 but <200,000 are in "public" hands.  I know someone knows the real number of shares held publicly... but I am trying to verify it.

Whatever way you slice it... I should be able to account for more then 64,469 shares, and yet I am unable.

binaryFate
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003


Still wild and free


View Profile
June 04, 2013, 02:53:03 PM
 #6405

Assuming your computations are correct, we could do this every weeks. Maybe it would make it clear that AM is steadily buying back shares or any other surprising fact.

EDIT: 100th post!!  Cool

Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. 
This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
Rival
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 502



View Profile
June 04, 2013, 03:00:13 PM
 #6406

At least missing the 21516 that BTC Trading Co claims they have. That's a good place to start.

Not to mention all the TAT shares they have.
binaryFate
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003


Still wild and free


View Profile
June 04, 2013, 03:10:15 PM
 #6407

Sorry, I don't have the time to explain which transactions I was counting, but with 64 469 shares you're definitely missing something^^

Hope you'll find time to elaborate.

Not to mention all the TAT shares they have.

TAT already mentionned his address was in the listing.

Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. 
This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
ThickAsThieves
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 04, 2013, 03:10:25 PM
 #6408

At least missing the 21516 that BTC Trading Co claims they have. That's a good place to start.

Not to mention all the TAT shares they have.

Mine are in there, as I mentioned earlier. I expect that all of Burnside's and DeadTerra's are in there as well.

There are only two likely answers:

1. There is a pool of shareholders that are paid from a 2nd address.
2. Bitfountain/AM have bought back shares.

If #2 is true, this changes the whole outlook for the current market price, meaning that most of the public shares are already in circulation on the passthroughs, and that there are very few "direct" shares left to buy. If this is true, it would be great for price stability, and possibly lead to an increase in value for all shares.

This is something I would love to hear Friedcat chime in on.

On that note, I think someone should compile a list of FAQ from shareholders that have gone unanswered. This list should be have no more than 3 questions at a time, and be posted in some kind of clear, concise way here, and in a pm to Friedcat. We should not waste his time with bullshit requests, but real relevant questions would be nice.

Discuss!
puck2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 234
Merit: 105



View Profile
June 04, 2013, 03:21:43 PM
 #6409

Everyone, please stop dominating your discussion and, more importantly, your thinking in USD. Thus is a Bitcoin operating operating in China that is minting bitcoins by mining and selling hardware globally.
ThickAsThieves
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 04, 2013, 03:24:32 PM
 #6410

Everyone, please stop dominating your discussion and, more importantly, your thinking in USD. Thus is a Bitcoin operating operating in China that is minting bitcoins by mining and selling hardware globally.

Random interjection is random.
gog1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 04, 2013, 03:28:37 PM
 #6411

If #2 is true, it may make prices and trading more transparent as most trading will be done via public exchanges, but does nothing to increase the earning power / share.  After all, shares are not being cancelled, still a pie with 400000 slices.  However, it does represent management's outlook of the business.

At least missing the 21516 that BTC Trading Co claims they have. That's a good place to start.

Not to mention all the TAT shares they have.

Mine are in there, as I mentioned earlier. I expect that all of Burnside's and DeadTerra's are in there as well.

There are only two likely answers:

1. There is a pool of shareholders that are paid from a 2nd address.
2. Bitfountain/AM have bought back shares.

If #2 is true, this changes the whole outlook for the current market price, meaning that most of the public shares are already in circulation on the passthroughs, and that there are very few "direct" shares left to buy. If this is true, it would be great for price stability, and possibly lead to an increase in value for all shares.

This is something I would love to hear Friedcat chime in on.

On that note, I think someone should compile a list of FAQ from shareholders that have gone unanswered. This list should be have no more than 3 questions at a time, and be posted in some kind of clear, concise way here, and in a pm to Friedcat. We should not waste his time with bullshit requests, but real relevant questions would be nice.

Discuss!
binaryFate
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003


Still wild and free


View Profile
June 04, 2013, 03:36:46 PM
 #6412

If #2 is true, can the price increase be more "artificial" that what we think? If AM is steadily buying backs shares, it pushes price up but without reflecting actual demand for it.

Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. 
This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
ThickAsThieves
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 04, 2013, 03:37:55 PM
 #6413

If #2 is true, can the price increase be more "artificial" that what we think? If AM is steadily buying backs shares, it pushes price up but without reflecting actual demand for it.


I have confirmation that there is more than one payout address.
binaryFate
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003


Still wild and free


View Profile
June 04, 2013, 03:40:16 PM
 #6414

If #2 is true, can the price increase be more "artificial" that what we think? If AM is steadily buying backs shares, it pushes price up but without reflecting actual demand for it.


I have confirmation that there is more than one payout address.

Can you find out which one so we can correct this study?

Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. 
This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
ThickAsThieves
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 04, 2013, 03:56:32 PM
 #6415

If #2 is true, can the price increase be more "artificial" that what we think? If AM is steadily buying backs shares, it pushes price up but without reflecting actual demand for it.


I have confirmation that there is more than one payout address.

Can you find out which one so we can correct this study?


I believe the other payout address(es) are private intentionally, to protect very large shareholders.
binaryFate
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003


Still wild and free


View Profile
June 04, 2013, 04:00:57 PM
 #6416

If #2 is true, can the price increase be more "artificial" that what we think? If AM is steadily buying backs shares, it pushes price up but without reflecting actual demand for it.


I have confirmation that there is more than one payout address.

Can you find out which one so we can correct this study?


I believe the other payout address(es) are private intentionally, to protect very large shareholders.

Larger than 12,000 shares? Wow  Shocked
I don't have time now but digging a bit I'm sure we could find them. Just following "AM coins" starting when they are mined from transaction to transaction. Nothing is private, thanks BTC  Smiley

Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. 
This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
MikkisJ
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 11


View Profile
June 04, 2013, 04:59:09 PM
 #6417

Bitfunder has over PT 18,000 shares, and my understanding is that all dividends are paid in one transfer, but you don't have that payment in your list. Or am I wrong?
Lohoris
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


Bitgoblin


View Profile
June 04, 2013, 05:07:16 PM
 #6418

On that note, I think someone should compile a list of FAQ from shareholders that have gone unanswered. This list should be have no more than 3 questions at a time, and be posted in some kind of clear, concise way here, and in a pm to Friedcat. We should not waste his time with bullshit requests, but real relevant questions would be nice.
• "Which is ASICMINER's bus factor?"

1LohorisJie8bGGG7X4dCS9MAVsTEbzrhu
DefaultTrust is very BAD.
bitfair
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 362
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 04, 2013, 05:11:44 PM
 #6419

On that note, I think someone should compile a list of FAQ from shareholders that have gone unanswered. This list should be have no more than 3 questions at a time, and be posted in some kind of clear, concise way here, and in a pm to Friedcat. We should not waste his time with bullshit requests, but real relevant questions would be nice.
• "Which is ASICMINER's bus factor?"

His post history indicates the answer is: 3.
nexus 6
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 75
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 04, 2013, 05:41:43 PM
 #6420

At least missing the 21516 that BTC Trading Co claims they have. That's a good place to start.

Not to mention all the TAT shares they have.

Mine are in there, as I mentioned earlier. I expect that all of Burnside's and DeadTerra's are in there as well.

There are only two likely answers:

1. There is a pool of shareholders that are paid from a 2nd address.
2. Bitfountain/AM have bought back shares.

If #2 is true, this changes the whole outlook for the current market price, meaning that most of the public shares are already in circulation on the passthroughs, and that there are very few "direct" shares left to buy. If this is true, it would be great for price stability, and possibly lead to an increase in value for all shares.

This is something I would love to hear Friedcat chime in on.

On that note, I think someone should compile a list of FAQ from shareholders that have gone unanswered. This list should be have no more than 3 questions at a time, and be posted in some kind of clear, concise way here, and in a pm to Friedcat. We should not waste his time with bullshit requests, but real relevant questions would be nice.

Discuss!

Hi,

I think this is a great idea, since provides some organization and improves comunication between shareholders and Friedcat.

If somebody compiles it, i would like to add a question:

Q- ¿Had Friedcat considered to start an advertising campaign here in the forum?

I remember BFL campaign.  These guys may dont be great making chips, but they are good at marketing.  Every single person was noticed all the time, about that BFL ASICS.

I have read many shareholders focusing on ASICMINER website development. It could be fine, but i mean that a single advertising campaingn could works quite well improving sales and revenues.

Also, as a shareholder, i would like to include some ASICMINER advertise in my signature space.
Pages: « 1 ... 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 [321] 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 ... 1348 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!