Bitcoin Forum

Economy => Reputation => Topic started by: suchmoon on December 18, 2018, 12:20:52 AM



Title: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 18, 2018, 12:20:52 AM
Let's help cryptohunter figure out her problem with the top 200 merit receivers (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5084723).

The original complaint was that top 200 receivers send to much merit between themselves (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5081670.msg48533695#msg48533695) (in reality it's ~12% or so) and there are many users on other boards who don't get merits for posts as good as or better than (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5081670.msg48544275#msg48544275) the ones made by the top 200. After repeated requests to show such unmerited posts cryptohunter is just now hunting (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086148.0) for that information so it couldn't have been the real original reason for this whole debacle.

So what's the real problem here? I hope this can serve as the main collection of all those grievances instead of getting spread out across multiple merit topics as cryptohunter has been doing lately.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on December 18, 2018, 01:11:54 AM
there are many users on other boards who don't get merits for posts as good as or better than the ones made by the top 200.
I'd love to know who those members are myself, as I'd be more than happy to give out some merits to them--assuming they're deserving of it by my standards, of course.  I think cryptohunter is looking for quality posts in the altcoin section specifically, and that's a monumental task if you're doing so by the old-school method of reading through threads.  There's so much garbage in all of those subsections that it's almost impossible to find lower-ranked members making good posts.  

Even in Economics, where I do the most reading, it's the Hero & Legendary members who always seem to take the time to write the most detailed and constructive posts.  I'm still trying to find Newbie-Full Member ranked people to give merits to, but most of them are just shitposters.

Cryptohunter IMO is just a cranky contrarian who thinks everyone's brain should function with the logic of a computer, and yet he has this obvious bleeding-heart liberal mentality which manifests itself in him constantly thinking there's some underdog situation on bitcointalk whereby a cabal of senior members are keeping the lower ranks down, like slaves on a 19th century Louisiana plantation.  I just don't see it that way, and I've put him on ignore.  I'm just tired of reading his posts, which are probably made with good intentions but are consistently way off the mark.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cestmoi on December 18, 2018, 01:28:19 AM
I understand and almost agree with @Cryptohunter's feeling.

But usually when you are in a privileged position you don't really notice what others might.

if i quote the pharmacist :

Awesome work Loyce
<snip>
**Shoots 1 Merit at Loyce into the circle jerk**
Agree, excellent data though it still makes me look a bit like part of the jerking circle, as less than 300 of the 1023 merits I've earned came from outside the top 200 club.  Or at least I'm betting that's how Cryptohunter will view it, though I haven't finished reading this thread and don't know if he's replied yet.  And LoyceV, you'll have to excuse me for not meriting you for your excellent analysis.  I don't have much sMerit left (still haven't figured out how merit sources get their sMerits replenished, and it always seems like I'm out of them), and I don't want to contribute to the "problem".

By the way,
putting cryptohunter on ignore  
....is not a bad idea.  Haven't done it yet, but it's been on my mind.

Edit:
Great work so far and I do appreciate the effort.
Ooops, that'll teach me to read the whole thread first before posting.  

he seams happy to see that 30% of his merit doesn't come from the top 300

Well, i see it this way :

https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=The%20Pharmacist

Quote
Merit Fans of The Pharmacist
Profile     Number   Sum  Rank
Foxpup ------133------286------143
TMAN------   43------100------21
suchmoon------30------85------7
dbshck------25------47------287
LoyceV------21------21------3
Jet Cash------15------   21------14
hilariousetc------12------21------54
Winner------1------20------never received a merit so not in classement -  he only sent 3 time 20 smerit within 5 minutes to post on the goods section
o_e_l_e_o------ 12------18------14
paxmao------ 11------17------92

So if we do a little bit of maths for @The pharmacist  
total sum received from 10 users = 636 merit = 61% from just 10 persons all (except 2 are part of the top 200).
If we look at the top 100 (remove foxpup, dbshck, Winner)
He has received 283 merit from the Top100 it is 28% of his merits from just 6 persons.
If you take the top 150, then it is 569 merit received (56% of all his merit) from just 8 persons, all in the elite.



I had a look to other names in the top 50 merit receiver, but without a bot it is time consuming and i am at work  ;D
@Lauda = 362 merit received ( 53%) from 10 persons.  https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Lauda
@Suchmoon = 527 merit received (52%) from 10 persons   https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=suchmoon
@Jet cash : 479 merit received (56%) from 10 persons  (6 of them are in the top100 - merit by top100 = 295 = 35% ) https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Jet%20Cash


I guess CryptoHunter is showing a mixed feeling of jalousie and also a will to get rid of the Merit-archy (word invented, derived from patriarchy but with the merit root).  Let's be honest, everybody is a little bit racist, has a preference to the charity they give, only hire people that like, only make friends with people they relate, would be reticent to help a foreigner but quite keen to help a fellow citizen. Would rater help a hot mom with a stroller than an old homeless.

Merits do stay in the top 100 / 200 / 300 call how you want.
The same way merit doesn't really cross boards. Merit earned in meta stays in meta.
I have seen some members that on spend all their meta received merit in their national board trying to help merit-deserving members to get the recognition that is very often just to hard to get.


post edited after suchmoon spotted a few typos. Edits are in italic


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 18, 2018, 01:43:10 AM
total sum received by 10 users = 636 merit = 61% from just 10 persons all (except 2 part of the top 200).

"received by" or "received from"? Kinda hard to follow what you're trying to say there. It's not like The Pharmacist can choose who to receive merit from.

Merit do stay in the top 100 / 200 / 300 call how yo want.
The same way merit doesn't really cross boards. Merit earned in meta stays in meta.
I have seen some members that on spend all their meta received merit in their national board trying to help merit-deserving members to get the recognition that is very often just to hard to get.

Just like cryptohunter, you forgot to post a list of those "merit-deserving members". Multiple merit sources have stated that they would be happy to send merit to those deserving users.

You also seem to be thinking that merits sent within Meta or within top 200 prevent other users from being merited. That's not how it really works. Merits are not scarce. We are sending less than 50% (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;stats=topsend) of the total capacity (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;stats=sources) per month.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cestmoi on December 18, 2018, 01:52:58 AM
total sum received by 10 users = 636 merit = 61% from just 10 persons all (except 2 part of the top 200).

"received by" or "received from"? Kinda hard to follow what you're trying to say there. It's not like The Pharmacist can choose who to receive merit from.
Received "from" I will edit my post for typo and mistakes.
I should have triple check the spelling and the writing.

Obviously I know that you can't chose where the merit come from.
I was just trying to show that -whether you agree or not- it looks like that merit is being circulated between the same members or at least that members prefer to send it to people that already have a title of legendary or hero (ie they relate to / same cast).


Merit do stay in the top 100 / 200 / 300 call how yo want.
The same way merit doesn't really cross boards. Merit earned in meta stays in meta.
I have seen some members that on spend all their meta received merit in their national board trying to help merit-deserving members to get the recognition that is very often just to hard to get.

Just like cryptohunter, you forgot to post a list of those "merit-deserving members". Multiple merit sources have stated that they would be happy to send merit to those deserving users.

You also seem to be thinking that merits sent within Meta or within top 200 prevent other users from being merited. That's not how it really works. Merits are not scarce. We are sending less than 50% (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;stats=topsend) of the total capacity (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;stats=sources) per month.


It is my intent to do so, but it will take me a few days to do something worthwhile.
Cheers for your answer.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: eddie13 on December 18, 2018, 02:01:35 AM
He is half right and you all know it..

Look at the first 2 posters in this thread. Over 1k merits each wasted if you are of the mindset that merits are for ranking up. But if you believe that merits are just for "good posts" then hell yes these first 2 posters deserve them because they make a ton of great posts. They are well established and experienced members therefore are very capable of making a lot of good posts because they know how things work around here.

Then you look at the proteges of these well established members (police in training) and they get tons of merits because they are in the "circle jerk"..
But they make very good posts according to them, in line with them, so if merits are just for good posts that you agree with then it is rightful. Their posts are also highly visible to them.

I have seen expressed a few times that the merit system is good for holding lower ranks down and keeping legedary status elite. Basically to turn legendary status into a much higher achievement than it has been previously. I can understand this view too because under the old system legendary wasn't as elite as some deserved and their should have been another rank above legendary created for the eliter.

It's 6 of one or a half dozen of another depending on your viewpoint.

Take me for example.
I am going to have 1030 activity for legendary soon but nowhere near enough merits even though I am a damn good poster.
Why? Because I don't make thousands of posts like some people do and legendary truly is a more elite rank to achieve than it used to be. That's fine..
My views are also not completely in line with those mostly in control and I like to bust balls when people get too authoritarian and/or big egos.
I speak out more than I should if I was just trying to achieve whatever high rank/respect/trust/power.  (like this)

You can't tell me that good posters merits are keeping up with their activity. It just is not the case. Much less just decent posters.
Should it be the case? It's just opinion. In my opinion NO, legendary status should become harder to achieve than just the activity requirement but how much? It is up to everyone's opinion separately so it is mostly up to whatever the established members feel is right.

It's a numbers game.
The more posts you make, the more visible, the more inline with the views of those that have merits to give, the more merits you get.
I can put a lot of effort into a post and get no merits, then I say something short, sweet, and funny and get a bunch. But it seems the more posts you make the better chances you get.
Much younger accounts than me get way more merits because they make thousands of posts, 10X as many as I do, and are visible and agreeable to the right people.

Cryptohunter makes a LOT of posts and a lot of them are very big long posts that took a lot of effort but are not inline with the views of those who have merit to give, so he gets few. Not that he needs them for any reason anyway.

It just is what it is. If I was just out to get merits I'd make tons and tons of posts that most sources would agree with, but I don't because I don't care that much to not just chill and be me.

If you just think everyone that disagrees with you over merit distribution is wrong then you should take into account their perspective on the situation and why they might feel that way.
I think a lot of posters that make good posts but are interested in other, non-political, topics have genuine grievances if they think their merit should keep up with activity. But should merit keep up with activity if you are just a good poster? It is just opinion and mine is no not really, high ranks should be harder to achieve than they used to be.  

I have mostly given up on saving my smerits for people that need to rank up and have been giving more to posts that I think are good and make good posts that I agree with..
I'm baaaadd too.. (though I did rank up some guy just now)

Just consider that everyone doesn't come from the same perspective as you and doesn't have the same opinions all the time and that doesn't mean they are wrong because their really is no factual right. This isn't math..


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 18, 2018, 02:13:15 AM
Obviously I know that you can't chose where the merit come from.
I was just trying to show that -whether you agree or not- it looks like that merit is being circulated between the same members or at least that members prefer to send it to people that already have a title of legendary or hero (ie they relate to / same cast).

I don't think you can draw that conclusion just from those numbers. It's quite possible that good posters happen to be higher-ranked more often than lower-ranked. If you have any ideas how to prove it one way or another - please share.

I can't speak for everyone but I tend to ignore the ranks when sending merits. I feel no affinity to "fellow" Legendaries whatsoever, or to a specific type of posts or anything like that. I've even merited well-formulated conspiracy theories even though I hate garbage like that. I've seen quite a few merit sources acting in a similar fashion so absent hard proof (like the case of QuestionAuthority (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5050263.msg47143024#msg47143024)) I'm not inclined to believe there is something untoward going on here.

merits are just for good posts that you agree with

Well, I disagree with that LOL

Also theymos said that's not what it's for and we must obey theymos, right?

Cryptohunter makes a LOT of posts and a lot of them are very big long posts that took a lot of effort but are not inline with the views of those who have merit to give, so he gets few. Not that he needs them for any reason anyway.

A good segway back to the topic. Cryptohunter's problem seems to be mainly the attempt to bend facts to fit a narrative. I think there would be merits raining on her if the original assertion about good posters hiding on altcoin boards turned out to be true.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: Veleor on December 18, 2018, 02:29:45 AM
Just like cryptohunter, you forgot to post a list of those "merit-deserving members". Multiple merit sources have stated that they would be happy to send merit to those deserving users.

I don’t know if it was suggested earlier. However merit sources can create a topic in Meta and offer to forum users, who believe that their post deserves a merit but was deprived of attention, to provide links to their texts with a small explanation comments.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: eddie13 on December 18, 2018, 03:23:39 AM
merits are just for good posts that you agree with
theymos said that's not what it's for and we must obey theymos, right?
Yes, but it is just human nature. Like greed..
People are giving merit to good messages in their opinion, not just to effort put into posts.
Theymos gave me merits for posting a meme..

What examples can you show of well written posts that you profoundly disagreed with, and you gave merits to?

IIRC Theymos said something like just decent posts deserve merit, basically anything not a shitpost, that they didn't have to be anything particularly elaborate or profound..
But I can't find it, maybe that is just the message that I took from him.
I did find..

I considered giving merit proportional to activity, but I decided not to because doing so would probably give far more undeserved merit than deserved merit in total. But undoubtedly some people got screwed by this, and if they have decent posts, by all means, give them the 250 or 500 merit that they need to rank-up.
I have not seen this done once.

If people are making good posts but are still struggling to get merit, then that's a problem with the merit system
How good is good according to who?

If the merit system completely fails and I can't think of anything else to replace it, then my next step will probably be to completely remove all ways for forum users to make money from posting (eg. removing signatures entirely).
Yeah let's not have that..

I'll see how things are in a month or two and think about it. Basically, the "ideal new user" should be able to easily and without any particular "merit farming" be able to far exceed the merit requirements; for them, activity should be the limiting factor. If this is not achievable, then I absolutely will make tweaks until that goal is reached. But it's too early to say at this point.
What is the "ideal new user"?
Does he mean Nulllius or just your average joe newb interested in learning cryptocurrency?

It is said that........
Merits are not scarce.
Over and over again and the truth of that is what backed me off busting sources asses a long time ago because it's true..

You sources are conservative with your merits, giving just enough that it is working while making high rank much harder to achieve and more elite. You are just doing what you think is right.
You aren't giving 10 merits to posts you pick instead of 1 because you must thing that is too many.. You think 1 is enough and they should be more scarce than giving out 10s all the time. You are keeping high rank elite. Whatever..
You 2 (first 2) deserve a higher rank than the old legendary, and some deserve higher than you, so maybe it should be more elite.

Sources shouldn't be pressured into giving more than they think is right. If Theymos wants more, then he needs more sources.
Some people feel that way. I'm in the middle and can feel for both sides.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on December 18, 2018, 03:38:44 AM
Sources shouldn't be pressured into giving more than they think is right. If Theymos wants more, then he needs more sources.
Some people feel that way. I'm in the middle and can feel for both sides.
I definitely don't feel pressured, and I didn't even ask to be a merit source to begin with. 

I still haven't figured out how the source merits get replenished.  It seems like I'm chronically out of them, and if it weren't for Foxpup giving me all those merits (I still can't figure out why he's given me so many), I wouldn't have been able to disperse as many as I have been.  Right now I'm out of source sMerits and earned sMerits.  Fortunately I did find a Jr. Member in the Economics section who wrote a fairly thoughtful post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1972815.msg48421546#msg48421546) that I merited, but I think I'd do a better job as a merit source if I got more source merits.  Then I might be able to give out 5 at a time or something like that.  As it stands, there's no way I could do that with what I've got.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 18, 2018, 03:55:07 AM
What examples can you show of well written posts that you profoundly disagreed with, and you gave merits to?

Quickseller's post about Kavanaugh (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4659296.msg46319344#msg46319344) for example. A few other posts in P&S as well, just can't find links quickly.

I considered giving merit proportional to activity, but I decided not to because doing so would probably give far more undeserved merit than deserved merit in total. But undoubtedly some people got screwed by this, and if they have decent posts, by all means, give them the 250 or 500 merit that they need to rank-up.
I have not seen this done once.

There is a 50-merit limit per person per month so if it did happen it would have taken months or multiple senders. I didn't intentionally try to rank anyone up but I did hit the limit a couple of times.

You sources are conservative with your merits, giving just enough that it is working while making high rank much harder to achieve and more elite. You are just doing what you think is right.
You aren't giving 10 merits to posts you pick instead of 1 because you must thing that is too many.. You think 1 is enough and they should be more scarce than giving out 10s all the time. You are keeping high rank elite. Whatever..
You 2 (first 2) deserve a higher rank than the old legendary, so maybe it should be more elite.

Sources shouldn't be pressured into giving more than they think is right. If Theymos wants more, then he needs more sources.
Some people feel that way. I'm in the middle and can feel for both sides.

Again, I can only speak for myself, but I'm trying send out all my sMerits because theymos said thou shalt not hoard LOL. If I have merits left over it means my standards are too high and I should lower them. Originally I had made up a bunch of criteria but right now when I'm considering a post for meriting it's basically like this: would having more of such posts improve the forum? (e.g. essentially "better than average"). If yes and if I have sMerits available - the post has a chance of getting merited (depending on how many other such posts I encounter during the day etc).

I still haven't figured out how the source merits get replenished.

They come back exactly 30 days (to the second) after being sent. So if you look at your sent merit history (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=487418) you'll see that you may have 6 or so sMerits coming back over the next couple of days, assuming those merits you sent 30 days ago were source merits and not earned merits - impossible to tell from the history unfortunately.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: Foxpup on December 18, 2018, 04:05:20 AM
Foxpup giving me all those merits (I still can't figure out why he's given me so many),
That's it, I've had enough of this bullshit. I defy you to find a single post of yours that I have merited that didn't deserve to be. I suspect what you really mean is, you can't figure out why nobody else is giving you so many merits, and I believe it's because you're Legendary and Legendaries (in other people's minds) don't deserve merits because they can't rank up. Of course, if people did give more merit to Legendaries, cryptohunter would be even more mad, but as it is, he just gets to be mad at me. Specifically me; he keeps talking about me even after I've stopped responding to his nonsense. I don't know what his problem is.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 18, 2018, 04:19:50 AM
I don't know what his problem is.

Jelly of your time machine obvs. I know I am.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: The Cryptovator on December 18, 2018, 08:42:23 AM
So what's the real problem here? I hope this can serve as the main collection of all those grievances instead of getting spread out across multiple merit topics as cryptohunter has been doing lately.
We know all about that many quality post have unmerited. There is few reason involved. I can see no one replied yet there. It's fine if any quality poster he find. But I don't think so he will find much.

Reason behind unmerited quality post;

1. Post in wrong board. Wrong board means even someone make quality post on like Altcoin Discussion board then he might missed merit due to over spam. Because quality post will not bump many time, no one will reply on it. So thread will go to bottom. Even merit source or merit holder visits board he will not find that post. On the other hand few merit source and merit holder ignored few board then how they will spend merit on that board.

2. Reply on mega thread. Who will bother to read mega thread reply? At least not I am. So even there is quality post how we will hunt it.

3. Airdrop merit holder. We can say them merit HODLER. Means they have HODL merit. I don't know why they don't want to spend merit. Most likely they don't know how hard to earn merit.

There are few more reason but mentioned above reason is main.

Look at the first 2 posters in this thread. Over 1k merits each wasted if you are of the mindset that merits are for ranking up.  
We can't compare with first 2 poster. They have mostly merited for appreciation, not only for good post. So forget about that user. Merit deserve on post, not a person. I already describe above why few quality post are unmerited.

Actually I am encourage to send merit to good poster especially newbie or low rank. Even I spend time to find them but rarely I found them. But what can I do if found best post from higher rank  :(. Also merited them.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 18, 2018, 10:48:59 AM
Foxpup giving me all those merits (I still can't figure out why he's given me so many),
That's it, I've had enough of this bullshit. I defy you to find a single post of yours that I have merited that didn't deserve to be. I suspect what you really mean is, you can't figure out why nobody else is giving you so many merits, and I believe it's because you're Legendary and Legendaries (in other people's minds) don't deserve merits because they can't rank up. Of course, if people did give more merit to Legendaries, cryptohunter would be even more mad, but as it is, he just gets to be mad at me. Specifically me; he keeps talking about me even after I've stopped responding to his nonsense. I don't know what his problem is.


Can you provide a post at all where I sound mad at you.  I am laughing with you and your excuses. Just ask tp out on a date and get it over. I mean he is not obviously falling for this merit courtship even after the vulpine is dangled I bet you won't even get an xmas card let and don't hold your breath until valentines day.... I mean suchmoon will send us all one as usual ... it's a numbers game for him as I have said all along.

I can't work out which are more ludicrous your excuses or suchmoons assumptions and logical fails that he makes time and time again.

Fun discussing things with you both though for sure.

Stop worrying so much about it all and creating more and more threads about it even though I have said I consider the case closed several times. Then telling me I am continuing to proliferate threads about this topic. Typical example of suchmoon madness.

Surely there is more to you than your self inflated subjective merit scores. Try to think about something else I have demonstrated with suchmoons assistance they are meaningless now so let's discuss some other interesting topics. I think this is the 5th time I have stated this so that probably means suchmoon or loyce will create another thread about it and tell me I am proliferating merit analysis in some biased raw data form.















Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: Foxpup on December 18, 2018, 12:16:42 PM
Just ask tp out on a date and get it over.
I don't think it'd work out. I'm already in a three-way with Moloch (58% of his merit was sent by me alone) and gmaxwell (37%), and like most foxes I only have so many holes available. :-\


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 18, 2018, 12:33:36 PM
Just ask tp out on a date and get it over.
I don't think it'd work out. I'm already in a three-way with Moloch (58% of his merit was sent by me alone) and gmaxwell (37%), and like most foxes I only have so many holes available. :-\

Well always room for one more right?

Suchmoon showed me that PM where you said to him you are sworn to a life of celibacy. I mean I know we all tell him that but still to admit this in public is going to be very upsetting for him.

Please edit before he sees it. The Pharmacist told me he has to cut off suchmoons credit line lately ...something about merits getting more expensive. This could get serious.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: LoyceV on December 18, 2018, 12:42:06 PM
So if we do a little bit of maths for @The pharmacist 
total sum received from 10 users = 636 merit = 61% from just 10 persons all (except 2 are part of the top 200).
If we look at the top 100 (remove foxpup, dbshck, Winner)
He has received 283 merit from the Top100 it is 28% of his merits from just 6 persons.
If you take the top 150, then it is 569 merit received (56% of all his merit) from just 8 persons, all in the elite.
Like cryptohunter, you're looking at it the wrong way. It makes perfect sense that the most merited users have the most Merit to give, and since they give it to good posts, it often ends up with the same people.

To stay with your example, let's get some more data on The Pharmacist:
Code:
     9. 1023 Merit received by The Pharmacist (#487418) from 171 unique users in 590 transactions
Code:
    31. 736 Merit sent by The Pharmacist (#487418) to 294 unique users in 579 transactions
As you can see, he's had Merit transactions with hundreds of people. It's no surprise that most of them don't have many sMerits to send, which leads to the obivous result that most of his Merit came from a small group of users.

And some more data:

User The Pharmacist (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=487418) (full history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/487418.html))
  • Received a total of 1023 Merit up to last Friday (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3078328.new#new).
  • Received 27 Merit (2.63%) for 5 (0.07%) of 7020 posts created before the introduction of Merit (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2818350.0) (0.0038 Merit per old post).
  • Received 978 Merit (95.60%) for 406 (15.71%) of 2583 posts created after the introduction of Merit (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2818350.0) (0.3786 Merit per new post).
  • Received 18 Merit (1.75%) for posts that are now deleted.


Merits do stay in the top 100 / 200 / 300 call how you want.
Again: you're looking at this the wrong way. Instead of looking where the Merit came from, you should look at the post it was sent to. Obviously there's some abuse, but I'm pretty sure most of the Top Receivers received it for legit good posts. Why would it matter who gave it, if the post deserves it?
I've merited your post, not because I agree, but because it's worth reading and you're not a spammer.

Look at the first 2 posters in this thread. Over 1k merits each wasted if you are of the mindset that merits are for ranking up.
I'll just respond to this part: that's the wrong mindset :P Theymos made it very clear we should try to merit great posts, and later backed it down a bit to "good posts".
Merit is only wasted when it is given to bad posts, or spammers.

This is what theymos told me:
You're now a merit source. Thanks for helping out!

Note that there is a bug with source merit which will have the effect of replenishing your source less than the expected amount. If you actually run out due to this, let me know and I'll just increase your source amount. (Also, I will eventually fix this...)
The bug is fixed, but I'm pretty sure I could get a larger source amount if I would ask for it. The only reason I haven't asked yet is because I still have 300+ sMerits left. I now manage to keep my source empty most of the time, and I'm slowly eating through my other stash.
Merit isn't scarce. But if a user is limited in sMerit, by all means: don't send it to the Legendary Top Merit Receivers, but find a low ranking user who deserves it. Merit was introduced to stop account farming spammers, and this forum needs new real users to survive in the long run.
According to [TOP-200] Members who support newbies - Thanks!  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5034141.0), I've given 41 Newbies their first Merit. I have no intention of keeping Legendary status an elite thing, I was in one of the highest paying signature campaigns before Merit existed, and I care enough about this forum to want to help improve it.
But I can't deny Merit has been much better for me than I ever would have thought! When it was introduced, I didn't quickly rise up to the Top merited users, that took a lot of effort.

Quote
Take me for example.
I am going to have 1030 activity for legendary soon but nowhere near enough merits even though I am a damn good poster.
Why? Because I don't make thousands of posts like some people do
Some stats:

User eddie13 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=580327) (full history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/580327.html))
  • Received a total of 191 Merit up to last Friday (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3078328.new#new).
  • Received 1 Merit (0.52%) for 1 (0.07%) of 1352 posts created before the introduction of Merit (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2818350.0) (0.0007 Merit per old post).
  • Received 190 Merit (99.47%) for 65 (17.01%) of 382 posts created after the introduction of Merit (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2818350.0) (0.4973 Merit per new post).
  • Received 0 Merit for posts that are now deleted.


I like using the "Merit per post" and "percentage of posts merited" for comparing post quality excluding the effect of the number of posts made by a user. Mine (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5051725.msg48723885#msg48723885) is very close to The Pharmacist. SaltySpitoon (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5051725.msg48553803#msg48553803), nullius (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5051725.msg46962554#msg46962554) and DdmrDdmr (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5051725.msg46962554#msg46962554) have much higher numbers. Gmaxwell (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5051725.msg46991102#msg46991102) holds the record as far as I know. You (eddie13) are above The Pharmacist and me, which indeed supports your claim of being a good poster, without enough posts to quickly rank up.

Quote
My views are also not completely in line with those mostly in control and I like to bust balls when people get too authoritarian and/or big egos.
True, I've seen you around, and merited you a few times. I try to make it a point to also merit good posts without agreeing, but it's always on my mind that my Merit can be seen as an endorsement for that post.

Quote
I speak out more than I should if I was just trying to achieve whatever high rank/respect/trust/power.  (like this)
That's a very good thing!

Quote
I can put a lot of effort into a post and get no merits, then I say something short, sweet, and funny and get a bunch.
Try sarcasm, that's the real money Merit maker :D
Seriously though, you're right. I find it hard to predict which of my posts will receive Merit.

Quote
Cryptohunter makes a LOT of posts and a lot of them are very big long posts that took a lot of effort but are not inline with the views of those who have merit to give
I don't mind disagreeing with cryptohunter. What made me put him on ignore is that he keeps saying the same thing in many different threads. He does make long posts indeed, which makes it a lot of effort to read too. If they're all unique I don't mind, but after reading the same thing ten or more times, I give up.

we must obey theymos, right?
I think theymos would disagree :P

Cryptohunter's problem seems to be mainly the attempt to bend facts to fit a narrative. I think there would be merits raining on her if the original assertion about good posters hiding on altcoin boards turned out to be true.
I don't even mind bending facts a bit, that can easily be disproven. Just not if it keeps coming back.
I'd like to take cryptohunter off ignore again if he (she?) stops repeating the same thing. Now I feel like I'm repeating myself too :P

However merit sources can create a topic in Meta and offer to forum users, who believe that their post deserves a merit but was deprived of attention, to provide links to their texts with a small explanation comments.
I've made this suggestion a few times to users, without much success.

You sources are conservative with your merits, giving just enough that it is working while making high rank much harder to achieve and more elite. You are just doing what you think is right.
You aren't giving 10 merits to posts you pick instead of 1 because you must thing that is too many.. You think 1 is enough and they should be more scarce than giving out 10s all the time. You are keeping high rank elite. Whatever..
You 2 (first 2) deserve a higher rank than the old legendary, and some deserve higher than you, so maybe it should be more elite.
I think my source sMerit is 200 now, per month. I make it a point to keep it as low as possibe, but I also try to Merit as many different posts and users as possible.
If you're not a Merit source yet, I think you should apply!

I think I'd do a better job as a merit source if I got more source merits
Ask theymos, see if he agrees.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 18, 2018, 01:07:49 PM
@loyce (he can't see me anyway)

I only have to hear

"Looking at it the wrong way"

"bending the facts"

to realise this is another attempt to claim high merit user = higher quality poster than low merit user

Even suchmoon has now confirmed without definition of a good post or good poster then the score is meaningless. Loyce is a little slower than suchmoon... sometimes in a good way (according to fox pup)

There is no incorrect way to look at the 0.13% lose 80% or greater of their merits if you simply remove the opinions of the same 0.13% the fact or not they are merit sources with most to give  then that is an result of the system and how it is set up and not an excuse to claim that still representing better posts get more merit than less good posts. However, as I have said there is no issue so long as you do not make silly claims about what the numbers mean.

That is simply numbers... that are not bending fact, not looking at the numbers upside down.

It is quite obvious more collisions, in a smaller board or boards (not the main discussion boards which you would think are the main boards on this forum) between people with more merit to give to each other for posts they align with are going to cycle merits around until there are some crazy even more meaningless scores.

I mean I am sure loyce wants you to believe he is the 3rd most valuable poster after theymos and satoshi on this board. That is obviously insane since he makes simple logical mistakes which I have brought him up on on time and time again without and reply from him about them. So by that measure the rest of the board are only incapable of making posts with even greater errors and even less valuable due to being illogical . I do not believe if I was talking to people of GM, VB, DZ theymos any critical thinkers that I would be finding huge holes in their statments and remarks . I am sorry but high merit rating does not equal higher value of posts generated than that of lower merit rating users. There are those with far lower merit than myself whom I know would not be making such strange logical errors during a debate. Same for suchmoon and most others that are arguing about all of this. (not all)

I have said this does not mean though that top scoring merit holders are bad posters either or worse than lower scoring merit holders. The only way one could know for sure was if every single post made here was matched agains the same comprehensive criteria for being good or having value. That is as of now impossible. So be satisfied that you are a popular poster.... at least within the 0.13%.

Stop going on and on about it and even following me here to this post (about me apparently) and keeping the topic going after I have said I am satisfied that all possible argument has been explored several times. It's like complaining there is a fire and then continually pouring on more fuel and throwing in a few gas bottles now and then.

I mean loyce should be grateful he got to re post data which I had already requested and presented several times from r1s2g3 and get over 20+ merits for it from his merit pals. What is there to moan about.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: Lauda on December 18, 2018, 03:10:38 PM
The complaint stems from jealousy and a lack of own constructive opinions worth "meriting". This is the classic "everyone else is to blame except me" nonsense. Do people not have something better to do than to create "useful statistics" which only result in TV-like drama regarding who got a lot of useless points from who? ::)

Cryptohunter makes a LOT of posts and a lot of them are very big long posts that took a lot of effort but are not inline with the views of those who have merit to give, so he gets few. Not that he needs them for any reason anyway.
A lot of big posts full of garbage and horrible opinions. A TMAN style "insert random swearing" response to a nonsensical thread is in most cases more worthy of merit.


I need to look up who the top givers in these circles are. I'll only read their posts from now on (placing everyone else I see on ignore). Since I see nothing else, meriting their objectively constructive posts is proper use of the merit system. Am I doing this right?

I don't think it'd work out. I'm already in a three-way with Moloch (58% of his merit was sent by me alone) and gmaxwell (37%), and like most foxes I only have so many holes available. :-\
I'm certain that you have a dinner invite planned for me somewhere down the road. Why else would you be showering me with all these merits? Quite classy I must say.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 18, 2018, 03:26:00 PM
The complaint stems from jealousy and a lack of own constructive opinions worth "meriting". This is the classic "everyone else is to blame except me" nonsense. Do people not have something better to do than to create "useful statistics" which only result in TV-like drama regarding who got a lot of useless points from who? ::)

Cryptohunter makes a LOT of posts and a lot of them are very big long posts that took a lot of effort but are not inline with the views of those who have merit to give, so he gets few. Not that he needs them for any reason anyway.
A lot of big posts full of garbage and horrible opinions. A TMAN style "insert random swearing" response to a nonsensical thread is in most cases more worthy of merit.


I need to look up who the top givers in these circles are. I'll only read their posts from now on (placing everyone else I see on ignore). Since I see nothing else, meriting their objectively constructive posts is proper use of the merit system. Am I doing this right?

I don't think it'd work out. I'm already in a three-way with Moloch (58% of his merit was sent by me alone) and gmaxwell (37%), and like most foxes I only have so many holes available. :-\
I'm certain that you have a dinner invite planned for me somewhere down the road. Why else would you be showering me with all these merits? Quite classy I must say.

LaudaM lol - nobody listens to scammers and scam promoters like you.

Nobody would invite you to dinner without chaining the silverware down.

Horrible opinions? Sorry Dash promoter your opinions have been proven horrible since the start. How are you even still allowed on this forum with all your red trust.

Read his early posts whilst promoting Dash scam. He/it was always swearing and trying to bully people around. Now butter would not melt in its mouth now apparently.

Then turns 180 once he dumps his dash scam coins saying it is a scam after all. Never trust this scammer.

Turn coats and scammers are not to be trusted so remain silent.

Give this fool more red trust if you are genuine about saving people from getting scammed.  

No wonder you were removed from any place of responsibility and trust. So remain silent snake tongue. Else I bring a big thread examining you in depth you in in full detail. Get back under your rock.





Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: coinlocket$ on December 18, 2018, 03:42:12 PM
It just is what it is. If I was just out to get merits I'd make tons and tons of posts that most sources would agree with, but I don't because I don't care that much to not just chill and be me.

That is, a good merit source, in my opinion, should merit a post even if he don't agree with, acknowledging the effort from users.
For the rest I agree on the most are you saying here, some posts are over merited for no reason and others are under merited only because you are not on the "good poster" for the source.
We maybe also talk about the reduction of required merit for legendary rank since if someone is lucky to hit legendary around 750-800 activity why he should wait till 1k merit? Maybe having a rank that require merit=activity after hero rank is the way to go.
And for last point, some legendary accounts really don't deserve their rank, they shit spam on the forum while other people with lower rank post better than them and they are still stucked on lowers ranks.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: Lauda on December 18, 2018, 03:46:17 PM
So remain silent snake tongue. Else I..
Its true colors quickly show themselves. ::)

Cryptohunter IMO is just a cranky contrarian who thinks everyone's brain should function with the logic of a computer, and yet he has this obvious bleeding-heart liberal mentality which manifests itself in him constantly thinking there's some underdog situation on bitcointalk whereby a cabal of senior members are keeping the lower ranks down, like slaves on a 19th century Louisiana plantation.  I just don't see it that way, and I've put him on ignore.  I'm just tired of reading his posts, which are probably made with good intentions but are consistently way off the mark.
Don't let someone push you aside with pseudo-logic. If only it remotely resembled actual logic, we wouldn't even get to this thread to begin with.

That is, a good merit source, in my opinion, should merit a post even if he don't agree with, acknowledging the effort from users.
If you reward people just for the effort, then you going to raise a wave of spoiled users very quickly (which most people complaining about this nonsense in fact are).


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 18, 2018, 03:48:19 PM
So remain silent snake tongue. Else I..
Its true colors quickly show themselves. ::)

Cryptohunter IMO is just a cranky contrarian who thinks everyone's brain should function with the logic of a computer, and yet he has this obvious bleeding-heart liberal mentality which manifests itself in him constantly thinking there's some underdog situation on bitcointalk whereby a cabal of senior members are keeping the lower ranks down, like slaves on a 19th century Louisiana plantation.  I just don't see it that way, and I've put him on ignore.  I'm just tired of reading his posts, which are probably made with good intentions but are consistently way off the mark.
Don't let someone push you aside with pseudo-logic. If only it remotely resembled actual logic, we wouldn't even get to this thread to begin with.

LOL else I out your previous and quite likely current shady practices.

WOW what a threat I help prevent people getting scammed by you. Why do you consider this a threat if you will be vindicated.

Sorry for mentioning you're a scam pusher/probable current scammer ............my true colours hey :(

TP is one of your ass lickers supporting bullshit like you keeping 3000bch apparently ... I cant take his moral compass seriously being a former scam lover of dash either. Even if is not true ( i have not looked into it) the fact that he thinks it is fine if it did happen even though the investors did not come off well over all of this is an example of his reasoning. I mean if I have got this wrong and we need a thread opened on it to examine the facts and help me get it all straight before commenting further on the entire episode let me know.

I mean perhaps this is all smoke without fire. So a thorough investigation of your prior history could be put under scrutiny to ensure I have not got you all wrong perhaps you are just a prior scam promoter and not a current scammer.

Pseudo logic - lol. Come on Lauda that's like saying you're a pseudo scammer/scam pusher with pseudo red trust and psuedo ass kick  from any position of trust or influence (except over TP).












Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: DireWolfM14 on December 18, 2018, 04:04:09 PM
So if we do a little bit of maths for @The pharmacist  
total sum received from 10 users = 636 merit = 61% from just 10 persons all (except 2 are part of the top 200).
If we look at the top 100 (remove foxpup, dbshck, Winner)
He has received 283 merit from the Top100 it is 28% of his merits from just 6 persons.
If you take the top 150, then it is 569 merit received (56% of all his merit) from just 8 persons, all in the elite.



I had a look to other names in the top 50 merit receiver, but without a bot it is time consuming and i am at work  ;D
@Lauda = 362 merit received ( 53%) from 10 persons.  https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Lauda
@Suchmoon = 527 merit received (52%) from 10 persons   https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=suchmoon
@Jet cash : 479 merit received (56%) from 10 persons  (6 of them are in the top100 - merit by top100 = 295 = 35% )

I appreciate the effort you've put into this post, and the math is quite telling.  But, like nearly all statistics they only tell part of the story.

If we take my example: I'm not one of the top 200 merit recipients, yet I've only received 22 of my 133 merits from outside the Top 200 Merit Recipients.  That's only 16% of my total.  I'm new around here, and certainly wouldn't consider myself as a member of the "Circle Jerk."

Of the members you referenced as examples, (to the best of my knowledge) three of them are very likely merit sources.  They can afford to be generous with their sMerit.  I myself, have never given more than a single merit to any post, and yet I've never received fewer than 4 from suchmoon.  And frequently receive a minimum of 2 from the Top 200.

It seems fairly clear to me that merit is awarded to good posts 99.99% of the time.  Of course "good posts" are subjective, and that's why we have over 100 merit sources on the forum, so that subjectivity is spread around.  

In my opinion, Cryptohunter's issue with legendary members getting banned is the opposite side of the effort to reduce spam.  The merit system is working in reducing spam, but there are still many hero and legendary spammers around.  They escaped the merit system simply by being here a year or two before it's implementation, and it's only for that reason that they were awarded their rank.  To keep their rank, they merely need to follow the rules.



Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 18, 2018, 04:12:56 PM

If we take my example: I'm not one of the top 200 merit recipients, yet I've only received 22 of my 133 merits from outside the Top 200 Merit Recipients.  That's only 16% of my total.  I'm new around here, and certainly wouldn't consider myself as a member of the "Circle Jerk."
  

In my opinion, Cryptohunter's issue with legendary members getting banned is the opposite side of the effort to reduce spam.  The merit system is working in reducing spam, but there are still many hero and legendary spammers around.  They escaped the merit system simply by being here a year or two before it's implementation, and it's only for that reason that they were awarded their rank.  To keep their rank, they merely need to follow the rules.



Aside from spreading around subjectivity to those that are already demonstrating they are hoarding inside the 0.13% hoping for improvement... and aside from the fact you are found to be supporting the circle at most opportunities I am not shocked they gave you some rewards I'll see you gave them some back too. I mean here you are now trying to bolster their nonsense with yet more stupid nonsense that I just revealed in 1 second but others may fall for hence why I called for the minimum of the top 300 to be removed along with meta board. You are adding weight to my argument that the top 0.13% not only benefit from their own cycling of merit ... they also gain merit from merit seeking ass kissers who hang out in meta and give them some back. I mean you are actually proving my point more than you realise.

However my main concern is those that have not sussed out to kiss ass nonsense and obvious broken logic theories in meta to sidle into the club eventually.

Let's get to this part I have left.

What are you trying to say exactly? be clear because what I am reading is totally and provably incorrect about me being anti spam reduction. Produce something more concrete than because I want legends to have a fair review.

Try not to take forever to reply I see these people sitting there online trying to think of their next excuse or support for a bunch of people not ready to accept they are mediocre posters incapable of anything of real note but are having fun all aligning and agreeing with each other in meta regarding how great their posts are and how to analyse merit best to make them look better or more credible.







Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: LoyceV on December 18, 2018, 04:16:55 PM
It seems fairly clear to me that merit is awarded to good posts 99.99% of the time.
Your numbers are quite optimistic :P
From the many merit abuse threads I've seen, and considering 281640 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3078328.new#new) sMerits have been sent until last Friday, I estimate a 2 digit percentage of this to be Merit abuse. But those came from the 600k sMerit airdrop. If you find a Merit source making very bad choices (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5050263.msg47050953#msg47050953), he may be removed as a source once reported.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: coinlocket$ on December 18, 2018, 04:30:58 PM
~ I estimate a 2 digit percentage of this to be Merit abuse. But those came from the 600k sMerit airdrop. If you find a Merit source making very bad choices (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5050263.msg47050953#msg47050953), he may be removed as a source once reported.

Back on days when I was looking at a weekly transaction (around May) the estimate amount of merit abused was around 30%, considering the merit sold, bought and exchanged.
I can also assume now the merit abused is lower than May, I think a 10% is the optimistic value.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 18, 2018, 05:14:42 PM
I understand and almost agree with @Cryptohunter's feeling.

But usually when you are in a privileged position you don't really notice what others might.

if i quote the pharmacist :

Awesome work Loyce
<snip>
**Shoots 1 Merit at Loyce into the circle jerk**
Agree, excellent data though it still makes me look a bit like part of the jerking circle, as less than 300 of the 1023 merits I've earned came from outside the top 200 club.  Or at least I'm betting that's how Cryptohunter will view it, though I haven't finished reading this thread and don't know if he's replied yet.  And LoyceV, you'll have to excuse me for not meriting you for your excellent analysis.  I don't have much sMerit left (still haven't figured out how merit sources get their sMerits replenished, and it always seems like I'm out of them), and I don't want to contribute to the "problem".

By the way,
putting cryptohunter on ignore  
....is not a bad idea.  Haven't done it yet, but it's been on my mind.

Edit:
Great work so far and I do appreciate the effort.
Ooops, that'll teach me to read the whole thread first before posting.  

he seams happy to see that 30% of his merit doesn't come from the top 300

Well, i see it this way :

https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=The%20Pharmacist

Quote
Merit Fans of The Pharmacist
Profile     Number   Sum  Rank
Foxpup ------133------286------143
TMAN------   43------100------21
suchmoon------30------85------7
dbshck------25------47------287
LoyceV------21------21------3
Jet Cash------15------   21------14
hilariousetc------12------21------54
Winner------1------20------never received a merit so not in classement -  he only sent 3 time 20 smerit within 5 minutes to post on the goods section
o_e_l_e_o------ 12------18------14
paxmao------ 11------17------92

So if we do a little bit of maths for @The pharmacist  
total sum received from 10 users = 636 merit = 61% from just 10 persons all (except 2 are part of the top 200).
If we look at the top 100 (remove foxpup, dbshck, Winner)
He has received 283 merit from the Top100 it is 28% of his merits from just 6 persons.
If you take the top 150, then it is 569 merit received (56% of all his merit) from just 8 persons, all in the elite.



I had a look to other names in the top 50 merit receiver, but without a bot it is time consuming and i am at work  ;D
@Lauda = 362 merit received ( 53%) from 10 persons.  https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Lauda
@Suchmoon = 527 merit received (52%) from 10 persons   https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=suchmoon
@Jet cash : 479 merit received (56%) from 10 persons  (6 of them are in the top100 - merit by top100 = 295 = 35% ) https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Jet%20Cash


I guess CryptoHunter is showing a mixed feeling of jalousie and also a will to get rid of the Merit-archy (word invented, derived from patriarchy but with the merit root).  Let's be honest, everybody is a little bit racist, has a preference to the charity they give, only hire people that like, only make friends with people they relate, would be reticent to help a foreigner but quite keen to help a fellow citizen. Would rater help a hot mom with a stroller than an old homeless.

Merits do stay in the top 100 / 200 / 300 call how you want.
The same way merit doesn't really cross boards. Merit earned in meta stays in meta.
I have seen some members that on spend all their meta received merit in their national board trying to help merit-deserving members to get the recognition that is very often just to hard to get.


post edited after suchmoon spotted a few typos. Edits are in italic
I totally missed this post and I am now going to take a good look over it. It seems even more telling than the figures I had looked at before.  This is great work.  

I wonder if those 10 users that are contributing to any of those people that get 100's upon 100's of merits are by any chance any of those arguing that there is nothing to see here in all of these threads and I am making a big fuss over nothing.  

Well I certainly see that the receivers of these generous 10 are in all of these threads LOL  

I mean the entire thing is quite funny.

I thought removing 80% of circle merits  for the top 200 was good. But now I see many can have over 50% removed from just 10 others. That is very revealing news. Who would have though lauda would be there or PT his supporting and understanding pal.

Can't wait for suchmoon and malborozo to have theirs done too.... weeeeeeeee that's like the merit snakes and ladders game when you have you  best ten buddies merits taken away and you fly down the reality merit slide.



Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on December 18, 2018, 05:29:44 PM
TP is one of your ass lickers supporting bullshit like you keeping 3000bch apparently ... I cant take his moral compass seriously being a former scam lover of dash either. Even if is not true ( i have not looked into it) the fact that he thinks it is fine if it did happen even though the investors did not come off well over all of this is an example of his reasoning.
I'm not a Dash lover by any means, though I've stated in the past that it's one of the coins I've liked.  I don't own any and have never done anything to seriously hype it, nor have I ever owned more than about 12 Dash at any given time.  I've always said I liked it because of the low transaction fees and quick confirmation times and its somewhat bad-boy reputation as being originally intended for use on the dark markets (which I've never had a part of).  I've always stated that I'm aware of its shady beginnings, the instamining and all of that.

As far as that situation with the 3000 BCH, I did pose a question in the thread about what happens in situations when a deal is underway and then a fork happens, i.e., who keeps the forked coins.  I can also tell you that I don't completely understand what that whole situation was about, much less what Lauda's role in it really was.  I often find myself reading claims on bitcointalk and not knowing all of the background or who's telling the truth, since there are so many scammers and liars here. 

I'm not trying to use ignorance as an excuse in the case you're referring to--I'm genuinely ignorant of what that deal was about, but I knew enough to question whether there was something arranged between the parties involved beforehand about the forked coins.  If you've got an investigation you can bring forth about Lauda, why don't you just do it instead of talking about it.  Then I'd like to hear the honest opinions from a variety of senior and/or trusted members. 

I don't appreciate being called an ass licker of Lauda.  I just happen to be loyal to people who've supported me, but not to the point of endorsing scamming behavior, and if that's what happened in that escrow deal then I don't condone that (but I'll need proof that's dumbed-down enough for me to follow)--but I'll always respect Lauda's scam- and spam-busting activities and general attitude.  But don't think for a minute that I'm in anyone's pocket, because I'm not.



Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 18, 2018, 05:46:45 PM
TP is one of your ass lickers supporting bullshit like you keeping 3000bch apparently ... I cant take his moral compass seriously being a former scam lover of dash either. Even if is not true ( i have not looked into it) the fact that he thinks it is fine if it did happen even though the investors did not come off well over all of this is an example of his reasoning.
I'm not a Dash lover by any means, though I've stated in the past that it's one of the coins I've liked.  I don't own any and have never done anything to seriously hype it, nor have I ever owned more than about 12 Dash at any given time.  I've always said I liked it because of the low transaction fees and quick confirmation times and its somewhat bad-boy reputation as being originally intended for use on the dark markets (which I've never had a part of).  I've always stated that I'm aware of its shady beginnings, the instamining and all of that.

As far as that situation with the 3000 BCH, I did pose a question in the thread about what happens in situations when a deal is underway and then a fork happens, i.e., who keeps the forked coins.  I can also tell you that I don't completely understand what that whole situation was about, much less what Lauda's role in it really was.  I often find myself reading claims on bitcointalk and not knowing all of the background or who's telling the truth, since there are so many scammers and liars here.  

I'm not trying to use ignorance as an excuse in the case you're referring to--I'm genuinely ignorant of what that deal was about, but I knew enough to question whether there was something arranged between the parties involved beforehand about the forked coins.  If you've got an investigation you can bring forth about Lauda, why don't you just do it instead of talking about it.  Then I'd like to hear the honest opinions from a variety of senior and/or trusted members.  

I don't appreciate being called an ass licker of Lauda.  I just happen to be loyal to people who've supported me, but not to the point of endorsing scamming behavior, and if that's what happened in that escrow deal then I don't condone that (but I'll need proof that's dumbed-down enough for me to follow)--but I'll always respect Lauda's scam- and spam-busting activities and general attitude.  But don't think for a minute that I'm in anyone's pocket, because I'm not.



I may donate time to laudaM in future but since he is already assumed a scammer by many and untrustworthy by more then I can donate my time in other ways that are perhaps even more beneficial. However if you insist we bring this investigation then keep pushing for it and if you want the truth out so bad and I am being lazy on that then you must do what your conscience dictates yourself without waiting for me,  I mean if you want to know if you are supporting a scammer out of some misjudged loyalty then perhaps you really need to get to the bottom of this and get all the  high merit legends in on the investigations of his entire actions since being here. I mean supporting anyone if you are unsure they are a scammer is very dangerous ground.


That is for you to decide so speaking up saying if there was nothing in the contract saying he could not keep money that was derived off other investors money (investors afaik that got fucked and lost on the project over all) is fine if there is nothing in the contract to say he can not is not moral to me. If it is to you then I would advice people recognise this before listening to your views on anything else. But then I am some bleeding hearted liberal so that again must be decided by others themselves.

I am not out to get you or anyone else specifically. I am simply wanting a fair and objective review of things and will not hesitate to push the facts and observable events out there for public examination.


What does putting on ignore mean here? I though that means you can not read my posts? put me on it or don't put me on it.

Even better bring me 1 instance of me making a false argument here  that has no corroborating events behind it. Just because you do not approve of the things I am looking into does not mean they should not be analysed at all for modifications to ensure more optimal results.

Everyone on these threads opposing me are the same names I am seeing where 50% or greater of their merit vanishes from just 10 pals being deleted and you keep meriting their excuses and nonsense.

I am not sure that you are a willing participant in the circle or just fox pup wants to take you out on a date.

Either way be objective on things or just stay out of it.  Else I can only conclude you are part of it.





 


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: Foxpup on December 18, 2018, 06:35:06 PM
I am not sure that you are a willing participant in the circle or just fox pup wants to take you out on a date.
Hey now, I can take a joke, but you just crossed the line. I can assure you that everyone I date is a willing participant, and I resent any implications to the contrary. >:(


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 18, 2018, 07:48:56 PM
suchmoons assumptions and logical fails that he makes time and time again.

My what now?

Stop worrying so much about it all and creating more and more threads about it even though I have said I consider the case closed several times. Then telling me I am continuing to proliferate threads about this topic. Typical example of suchmoon madness.

You've been spamming quite a few merit threads with your tenuous claims so this thread is an attempt to keep it all in one place. I'm sure you'll appreciate that and refrain from off-topic posts elsewhere.

I have demonstrated with suchmoons assistance they are meaningless now

Sorry, what exactly did I assist you with?

so let's discuss some other interesting topics

That's what this thread is for so it's really up to you.

Even suchmoon has now confirmed without definition of a good post or good poster then the score is meaningless.

Really? Where did I do that?

There is no incorrect way to look at the 0.13% lose 80% or greater of their merits if you simply remove the opinions of the same 0.13% the fact or not they are merit sources with most to give  then that is an result of the system and how it is set up and not an excuse to claim that still representing better posts get more merit than less good posts. However, as I have said there is no issue so long as you do not make silly claims about what the numbers mean.

That is simply numbers... that are not bending fact, not looking at the numbers upside down.

No, it's your personal opinion. The numbers don't say why those merits are sent that way. You're simply setting up a straw man argument (e.g. 150k users are eligible for merit) and then topping it up with a false dilemma (e.g. if someone is saying that 0.13% deserve those merits then they're saying that 99.87% can't make better posts). That's not how it actually works. Most users are shitposters, and yes most Legendaries are too - I know you're gonna like this one - so most of those 150k will never receive a single merit, which is how the merit system is supposed to work.

25k users have received merit. Some received more than others, which is inevitable. But simply taking out merit sources or certain boards isn't gonna prove unfairness even if it exists. You can still believe it if you want. It's just that the numbers you keep throwing around don't mean that.

~ personal attack

~ personal attack

So a thorough investigation of your prior history could be put under scrutiny to ensure I have not got you all wrong

Let me guess. You're gonna enroll someone else to do the investigation?

~ personal attack

~ personal attack

~ personal attack

~ personal attack

I'm getting a feeling that you have personal problems with some (or many) of the top 200 merit receivers, or with people who disagree with you in general, and you're trying to find a way make them look inferior in some way. Which is fair game I guess. As long as you can keep it in this thread and not all over the place (hint: nobody is stalking you even if they happen to post in the same threads as you do).


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: eddie13 on December 18, 2018, 08:52:29 PM
What examples can you show of well written posts that you profoundly disagreed with, and you gave merits to?
Quickseller's post about Kavanaugh (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4659296.msg46319344#msg46319344) for example. A few other posts in P&S as well, just can't find links quickly.
You are right. I was too narrow in the way I said it because it does happen on occasion but I still believe it is not the norm.
I also need to work on not saying "you" so much in my posts or addressing a certain other poster like that because I certainly don't mean/want to put a specific person on the spot like that, usually..

I should have said something more like - "How many merited posts do you all see merited for quality of writing and effort despite the sender profoundly disagreeing with the message of the post they merited?"

I think it is natural for us to use merit as a "+1", or a "Yeah, what he said." to show our support for a well placed message that we want to back up as an endorsement.
Or even something funny but low effort, just whatever we enjoy.

Try sarcasm, that's the real money Merit maker :D
It's very true and natural for us to do and I don't think it is wrong to do so, but I can see why someone from another perspective who thinks it's not so funny would feel butthurt seeing a low effort post get merited.

User eddie13 - (0.4973 Merit per new post)
Hey, that's pretty good but look at this one..
  181. eddie13 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=580327) earned 191 50 Merit from outside the Top 200 Merit Receivers
   181. eddie13 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=580327) earned 191 27 Merit from outside the Top 500 Merit Receivers
My stats there are abysmal! (If the ratio means something bad like some perspectives seem to think.)

If you're not a Merit source yet, I think you should apply!
I might some day..


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 18, 2018, 09:17:05 PM
What examples can you show of well written posts that you profoundly disagreed with, and you gave merits to?
Quickseller's post about Kavanaugh (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4659296.msg46319344#msg46319344) for example. A few other posts in P&S as well, just can't find links quickly.
You are right. I was too narrow in the way I said it because it does happen on occasion but I still believe it is not the norm.
I also need to work on not saying "you" so much in my posts or addressing a certain other poster like that because I certainly don't mean/want to put a specific person on the spot like that, usually..

I should have said something more like - "How many merited posts do you all see merited for quality of writing and effort despite the sender profoundly disagreeing with the message of the post they merited?"

I'd still say quite a lot. I'm abrasive with pretty much everyone and I'm still getting merited occasionally. I can see some merit sources sending merits to both sides of a good debate.

I think it's easier to send merits where I don't need to take sides (e.g. some purely technical discussion that doesn't involve Bitcoin Cash).

I think it is natural for us to use merit as a "+1", or a "Yeah, what he said." to show our support for a well placed message that we want to back up as an endorsement.
Or even something funny but low effort, just whatever we enjoy.

Possible. But for the top 200 or some other group to collude in a way that cryptohunter was implying is just unfeasible. I might "like" your post here but after that I have no control whatsoever whom you send your two earned sMerits to, e.g. it could be TECSHARE, whom I don't "like" at all. Not to mention there are 119 merit sources with many different viewpoints. So even if I'm being too naive about bias on the individual level I still think the system ends up quite diverse and unbiased overall.





Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 18, 2018, 10:21:14 PM
suchmoons assumptions and logical fails that he makes time and time again.

My what now?

Stop worrying so much about it all and creating more and more threads about it even though I have said I consider the case closed several times. Then telling me I am continuing to proliferate threads about this topic. Typical example of suchmoon madness.

You've been spamming quite a few merit threads with your tenuous claims so this thread is an attempt to keep it all in one place. I'm sure you'll appreciate that and refrain from off-topic posts elsewhere.

I have demonstrated with suchmoons assistance they are meaningless now

Sorry, what exactly did I assist you with?

so let's discuss some other interesting topics

That's what this thread is for so it's really up to you.

Even suchmoon has now confirmed without definition of a good post or good poster then the score is meaningless.

Really? Where did I do that?

There is no incorrect way to look at the 0.13% lose 80% or greater of their merits if you simply remove the opinions of the same 0.13% the fact or not they are merit sources with most to give  then that is an result of the system and how it is set up and not an excuse to claim that still representing better posts get more merit than less good posts. However, as I have said there is no issue so long as you do not make silly claims about what the numbers mean.

That is simply numbers... that are not bending fact, not looking at the numbers upside down.

No, it's your personal opinion. The numbers don't say why those merits are sent that way. You're simply setting up a straw man argument (e.g. 150k users are eligible for merit) and then topping it up with a false dilemma (e.g. if someone is saying that 0.13% deserve those merits then they're saying that 99.87% can't make better posts). That's not how it actually works. Most users are shitposters, and yes most Legendaries are too - I know you're gonna like this one - so most of those 150k will never receive a single merit, which is how the merit system is supposed to work.

25k users have received merit. Some received more than others, which is inevitable. But simply taking out merit sources or certain boards isn't gonna prove unfairness even if it exists. You can still believe it if you want. It's just that the numbers you keep throwing around don't mean that.

~ personal attack

~ personal attack

So a thorough investigation of your prior history could be put under scrutiny to ensure I have not got you all wrong

Let me guess. You're gonna enroll someone else to do the investigation?

~ personal attack

~ personal attack

~ personal attack

~ personal attack

I'm getting a feeling that you have personal problems with some (or many) of the top 200 merit receivers, or with people who disagree with you in general, and you're trying to find a way make them look inferior in some way. Which is fair game I guess. As long as you can keep it in this thread and not all over the place (hint: nobody is stalking you even if they happen to post in the same threads as you do).

LOL please re read out prior conversations and find all of those answers for yourself.

If you are unable to then get assistance from anyone else who can read and recall what they have read after 5 mins.

If they are not free to assist you then if you state that I will not find any grounding for those statements one by one and list them as above I will come and assist you.

I don't really have any personal issues with ANY person on this board except scammers/scam enablers/scam protectors.

I will post where I like and when I like so long as I please to do so. You are a spammer and have continuously wanted the last (incorrect) word on everything forcing the conversation to continue as you are doing now.

Loyce and you have now made 2 threads to continue this discussion on this specific topic after I had already said I am ready to move on and happy with the presentation that has been made.

I will not be contained to this thread just because you say so.




Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 18, 2018, 10:32:48 PM
LOL please re read out prior conversations and find all of those answers for yourself.

If you are unable to then get assistance from anyone else who can read and recall what they have read after 5 mins.

If they are not free to assist you then if you state that I will not find any grounding for those statements one by one and list them as above I will come and assist you.
No idea what this all means but please do assist. I need your help very much. Anything that keeps you from trolling the rest of the forum is welcome here.

I don't really have any personal issues with ANY person on this board except scammers/scam enablers/scam protectors.

I will post where I like and when I like so long as I please to do so. You are a spammer and have continuously wanted the last (incorrect) word on everything forcing the conversation to continue as you are doing now.

Loyce and you have no made 2 threads to continue this discussion on this specific topic after I had already said I am ready to move on and happy with the presentation that has been made.
I don't know about LoyceV but i made this thread for you to air your grievances, whatever those might be. If there aren't any - great. IDGAF whose word is last but then again, you think people posting in the same thread are stalking you.

Can you list also these personal attacks on yourself that I have made that have no grounding also I am interested in them.
Dude... your attack is under my avatar and then you attacked me for putting it under my avatar :)


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 18, 2018, 10:49:30 PM
LOL please re read out prior conversations and find all of those answers for yourself.

If you are unable to then get assistance from anyone else who can read and recall what they have read after 5 mins.

If they are not free to assist you then if you state that I will not find any grounding for those statements one by one and list them as above I will come and assist you.
No idea what this all means but please do assist. I need your help very much. Anything that keeps you from trolling the rest of the forum is welcome here.

I don't really have any personal issues with ANY person on this board except scammers/scam enablers/scam protectors.

I will post where I like and when I like so long as I please to do so. You are a spammer and have continuously wanted the last (incorrect) word on everything forcing the conversation to continue as you are doing now.

Loyce and you have no made 2 threads to continue this discussion on this specific topic after I had already said I am ready to move on and happy with the presentation that has been made.
I don't know about LoyceV but i made this thread for you to air your grievances, whatever those might be. If there aren't any - great. IDGAF whose word is last but then again, you think people posting in the same thread are stalking you.

Can you list also these personal attacks on yourself that I have made that have no grounding also I am interested in them.
Dude... your attack is under my avatar and then you attacked me for putting it under my avatar :)



LOL i see. You mean I described how you actually are and how you actually act. I can see why that may seem like and attack ...it is called reality.

Then I told you that you should not be using my prior art and descriptive flair and passing it off as your own original work. Put it in " " or that could be plagiarism. I was obviously joking since about that part since I am not the sort of gimp who would see a legend banned for one single incidence of this unless it was financially motivated and a repeated offence.

Now  back to grassing legends up for incidents that took place 4 years ago and feeling good about yourself. Don't allow me to keep making fun of you I feel bad about if afterwards and have to lash myself each night. I would feel better for you if you just stayed clear of me unless you have really thought through your entire point before throwing word salad at me. Then denying it or pretending you do not know what I am referring too.

Now no need to continue on about all of this because I am happy to let it drop for now. Any post of yours about this merit hoarding and cycling is willingly and knowingly forcing the conversation to continue so don;t then complain I am going on about it. That is just another logic fail of yours that you can not realise.



Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cestmoi on December 18, 2018, 11:01:34 PM
~snip~

I appreciate the effort you've put into this post, and the math is quite telling.  But, like nearly all statistics they only tell part of the story.

If we take my example: I'm not one of the top 200 merit recipients, yet I've only received 22 of my 133 merits from outside the Top 200 Merit Recipients.  That's only 16% of my total.  I'm new around here, and certainly wouldn't consider myself as a member of the "Circle Jerk."

Of the members you referenced as examples, (to the best of my knowledge) three of them are very likely merit sources.  They can afford to be generous with their sMerit.  I myself, have never given more than a single merit to any post, and yet I've never received fewer than 4 from suchmoon.  And frequently receive a minimum of 2 from the Top 200.

It seems fairly clear to me that merit is awarded to good posts 99.99% of the time.  Of course "good posts" are subjective, and that's why we have over 100 merit sources on the forum, so that subjectivity is spread around.  

In my opinion, Cryptohunter's issue with legendary members getting banned is the opposite side of the effort to reduce spam.  The merit system is working in reducing spam, but there are still many hero and legendary spammers around.  They escaped the merit system simply by being here a year or two before it's implementation, and it's only for that reason that they were awarded their rank.  To keep their rank, they merely need to follow the rules.



Thanks for your answer, I am probably wrong, and indeed anyone can make number saying anything.

I wanted to show that I can understand cryptohunter because it looks like (at least in the meta) that the merit is always circulating between the same person.
Also you are right, i didnt check if any of them was a merit source.



~snip~
Merits do stay in the top 100 / 200 / 300 call how you want.
Again: you're looking at this the wrong way. Instead of looking where the Merit came from, you should look at the post it was sent to. Obviously there's some abuse, but I'm pretty sure most of the Top Receivers received it for legit good posts. Why would it matter who gave it, if the post deserves it?
I've merited your post, not because I agree, but because it's worth reading and you're not a spammer.
~snip~

Yes you are right, it is a valid point that @Suchmoon has put forward a few times.
Don't get me wrong, i am not siding with CryptoHunter in saying that the merit is being abused and that legendary want to keep it for them.
I just wanted to express the point that if you look at numbers from a certain angle (top receiver, getting merit from top receivers), it appears that it is circulating amont a small number of high ranked users. Hence trying to explain why cryptoHunter might feel that there is a jerking circle.

Your message and @direwolfM14's  are perfect at explaining why my conclusion / view was not right and that there is more to it than just looking at the layer i did.
I do not have the skills to dig it more. I'm happy with the conclusion drawn from your message here and also the link you provided  [TOP-200] Members who support newbies - Thanks! (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5034141.0)

cheers




Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 18, 2018, 11:19:41 PM
LOL i see. You mean I described how you actually are and how you actually act. I can see why that may seem like and attack ...it is called reality.
It's not. I don't have a horse.

Then I told you that you should not be using my prior art and descriptive flair and passing it off as your own original work. Put it in " " or that could be plagiarism. I was obviously joking since about that part since I am not the sort of gimp who would see a legend banned for one single incidence of this unless it was financially motivated and a repeated offence.
You're right. It was very inconsiderate of me to disrespect your non-intellectual property. I've fixed it.

Now  back to grassing legends up for incidents that took place 4 years ago and feeling good about yourself. Don't allow me to keep making fun of you I feel bad about if afterwards and have to lash myself each night. I would feel better for you if you just stayed clear of me unless you have really thought through your entire point before throwing word salad at me. Then denying it or pretending you do not know what I am referring too.
I see. It seems you're also upset about me reporting shitposters to mods. Is that at the root of all this? You don't like plagiarists to be banned and it aggravates you that some of the reporters are also in the top 200 of merit receivers?

Now no need to continue on about all of this because I am happy to let it drop for now. Any post of yours about this merit hoarding and cycling is willingly and knowingly forcing the conversation to continue so don;t then complain I am going on about it. That is just another logic fail of yours that you can not realise.
No, I'm not going to complain about you posting in this thread - that's exactly what it's for. I actually asking you to post here as much as you can.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: marlboroza on December 18, 2018, 11:49:46 PM
Stop spamming your sig and stalking me and my posts. Using them as an excuse to spam your sig is annoying.
I accidentally mistype my forum nick on one strange unknown search engine which I can't remember which one it was and I was pointed to this post:
Can't wait for suchmoon and malborozo to have theirs done too....
...so thank you for inviting me to this valuable and sensible discussion which moved from "cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers" to "tag Lauda!" and "Lauda stuck it in TP's ass "


This is what you should do. Copy this post and send it directly to theymos because lost of shit is going on at the moment:
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=theymos
https://i.imgur.com/0rzIOMo.png

Don't forget to tell him to remove merits he has sent me because it is wrong to receive merits from top 200 merit receivers.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 19, 2018, 12:32:39 AM
@suchmoon
nothing of substance

@malborozo

Describing disturbing fantasies of his own and pretending to quote me when I never said that at all.

Please stop pretending you are just accidentally browsing random search engines and not stalking down my every thread. I would never invite you to spam your sig whilst pretending to make worthwhile comment.

You really go searching for your own username in search engines with the exact same mispelling as mine.... sounds like a usual excuses I hear in meta.

You must get out more.




Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 19, 2018, 12:46:00 AM
Describing disturbing fantasies of his own and pretending to quote me when I never said that at all.

You do realize that one can click on the quote and go to the post where you actually said that?


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: o_e_l_e_o on December 19, 2018, 01:00:35 AM
stalking down my every thread
I will post where I like and when I like


the top 0.13% not only benefit from their own cycling of merit ... they also gain merit from merit seeking ass kissers who hang out in meta and give them some back.
I will merit whom I please

See also: hypocrisy, double standards, do as I say and not as I do, pot calling the kettle black

It seems we all agree there are some good posts and good posters who go unnoticed and therefore unmerited. It also seems we all agree that people are free to send merit to whomever they like, for whatever content they like, in whatever quantities they like, and in whatever timeframe they like. With that in mind, if you are serious about rectifying this situation, I would suggest your time and energy would be better spent either hunting down these unmerited good posts for the sources' collective attention, or reporting bad posts to help clean up the Altcoin boards.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 19, 2018, 01:17:14 AM
Describing disturbing fantasies of his own and pretending to quote me when I never said that at all.

You do realize that one can click on the quote and go to the post where you actually said that?


Point me there

@oieoie

Is that the exact same post I already replied too before? Please read the other thread.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: o_e_l_e_o on December 19, 2018, 01:27:20 AM
@oieoie

A truly impressive misspelling of a word that only has 3 letters.

@craptobanter

In the other thread you said you were done with this topic and wanted to move on and to discuss something new. Once again, I would urge you to take your own advice.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 19, 2018, 01:42:48 AM
Describing disturbing fantasies of his own and pretending to quote me when I never said that at all.

You do realize that one can click on the quote and go to the post where you actually said that?


Point me there

https://meem.link/i/a/swgzgmo.gif
Edited 2020-11-30 to fix a broken image


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 19, 2018, 02:17:09 AM
Stop spamming your sig and stalking me and my posts. Using them as an excuse to spam your sig is annoying.
I accidentally mistype my forum nick on one strange unknown search engine which I can't remember which one it was and I was pointed to this post:
Can't wait for suchmoon and malborozo to have theirs done too....
...so thank you for inviting me to this valuable and sensible discussion which moved from "cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers" to "tag Lauda!" and "Lauda stuck it in TP's ass "


This is what you should do. Copy this post and send it directly to theymos because lost of shit is going on at the moment:
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=theymos
https://i.imgur.com/0rzIOMo.png

Don't forget to tell him to remove merits he has sent me because it is wrong to receive merits from top 200 merit receivers.

misquoting me and trying to silence me about him probably being number 1 on the reduction list after smallest subset of givers are removed.
this is dishonest


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 19, 2018, 04:28:26 AM
@oieoie

A truly impressive misspelling of a word that only has 3 letters.

@craptobanter

In the other thread you said you were done with this topic and wanted to move on and to discuss something new. Once again, I would urge you to take your own advice.

1. how do you suggest I do this when they keep making new threads about it and specifically about me?
However yes you are correct I have said I am happy not to discuss it further about 5 or 6x already 2 complete thread before this one.. to the same people that first keep asking me things and creating new threads then saying I am spamming about it???

2. You are double posting on different threads which people get banned for and also I answered this clearly already?

Did you arrive here by searching your misspelled name on an obscure search engine or are you following every post I make?

Stop being upset about factual presentation of stats and read my reply to your identical post on the other thread before following me everywhere asking the same thing.

If you find my last answer does not answer your questions (false assumptions) in full say what parts you are needing further clarification on in detail like a sensible reasonable person. I can not believe you even read the reply because i clearly say every can merit who they like for what they like .... it is then the meaning they attribute to the merit scores which that needs to be clear. Start reading and stop creating straw men that only exist in your mind.

Try this again https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5084723.msg48730620#msg48730620

are you saying you already read this and need to now search for me again here to ask the same thing?



Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 19, 2018, 04:39:38 AM
You are double posting

I feel like we'll soon need a bingo for stuff cryptohunter projects onto others.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 19, 2018, 04:58:26 AM
You are double posting

I feel like we'll soon need a bingo for stuff cryptohunter projects onto others.


1. can you be banned for repeated posting of your own posts in different threads?
not that I am going to report it because i;m not into all that for a one off things that seem to be reasonble if he did not see the first time around

2. it is not 100% the same but it is quoting the same things he quoted before I already addressed. ?

or exactly the same questions and exact things I just answered him on.

"Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on 17-12-2018, 23:15:05
Quote from: cryptohunter on 17-12-2018, 22:51:37
I will merit whom I please

Exactly! People are free to merit whomever the please. If this rule applies to you, why does it not apply to the top 200 merit receivers/senders/sources or the Meta board, against which you seem to have some sort of personal vendetta?"

How is it you  happen to be here again so soon?

Actually now i review your video why are you highlighting that part where it says

looking foward to such and marlboroz having theirs done?

What specifically is the reason to highlight that line in particular?

Explain the video step by step... what are you trying to demonstrate? because now I watch it again it seems strange to highlight that line at all.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 19, 2018, 05:11:21 AM
You are double posting

I feel like we'll soon need a bingo for stuff cryptohunter projects onto others.


1. can you be banned for repeated posting of your own posts in different threads?

Depends on the content of those posts. But you can surely get banned if you make consecutive posts in the same thread, like you just did. And you know it because recently you complained (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086175.0) about someone else doing it and that person got a temp ban, so it's quite puzzling why you're deliberately breaking the rules now.

Actually now i review your video why are you highlighting that part where it says

looking foward to such and marlboroz having theirs done?

What specifically is the reason to highlight that line in particular?

Explain the video step by step... what are you trying to demonstrate?

I'm showing that the actual quotes (ones within quote tags) lead to actual things you said.

That was before I realized you misinterpreted the double quotation marks, not the quote tags, since you never said which part you considered misquoted.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 19, 2018, 05:19:12 AM
You are double posting

I feel like we'll soon need a bingo for stuff cryptohunter projects onto others.


1. can you be banned for repeated posting of your own posts in different threads?

Depends on the content of those posts. But you can surely get banned if you make consecutive posts in the same thread, like you just did. And you know that because recently you complained (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086175.0) about someone else doing it and that person got a temp ban so it's quite puzzling why you're deliberately breaking the rules now.

Actually now i review your video why are you highlighting that part where it says

looking foward to such and marlboroz having theirs done?

What specifically is the reason to highlight that line in particular?

Explain the video step by step... what are you trying to demonstrate?

I'm showing that the actual quotes (ones within quote tags) lead to actual things you said.

That was before I realized you misinterpreted the double quotation marks, not the quote tags, since you never said which part you considered misquoted.

I did not misinterpret as is obvious ... he quoted my first remark then quoted something like my second remark which was no way attributed to anything anyone else said on the thread since nobody did say anything like that.

Are you saying he said the thread descended into something i said and then something nobody said at all??? and put it in quotes along with my statement for some reason?  and then gives me red trust for natural sensible assumption he is misquoting me.

Then instead of explaining he is actually quoting nobody for some reason he give me red trust for it.

LOL this is foolish and a clear abuse of trust here. I find it impossible anyone can see it any other way.

That along with the statement about .....I was browsing some search engine I cant remember which one and I mispelled my name just exactly as cryptohunter had just previously???

This is a clearly trumped up fantastical nonsense .... he did not want his top 10 meriters removed simple as that and was sore for having the most merits from the smallest group. LOL that's not my problem I never called for removal of top 50 that was loyce. Sorry malboroza

Honestly I am not kidding I will seriously have you investigated for this fantastical story of nonsense to protect and enable such trust abuse if you continue creating these nonsense stories. You seriously stating this as reality or credible explanation demonstrates you need to be looked at in depth for being part of this.

I am being deadly serious when I say  this is flagrant and observable abuse by him and also you are enabling and claiming he is correct in his actions in the face of all evidence that is there for all to see.

Nobody should be in any doubt after looking at the thread that this is disgraceful  that you are pushing for this red trust to stick.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on December 19, 2018, 05:29:26 AM
I'd just like to let it be known that at no time has anything been inserted into any of my orifices by any member of bitcointalk.  Specifically, I have never been penetrated by Lauda as I believe I read somewhere in this thread.  Never even had any decent offers, and I'm a pretty high-class hoe in great demand, too.

I didn't figure cryptohunter would get negged for all of his blabbering as of late, but I probably should have expected it.  Same thing happened to mixan a while back when he went off the deep end and started taking the forum hostage with his raving lunacy.  There comes a point where if you spout enough nonsense and attack too many people, it's not going to be taken kindly to anymore.  I'm a bit puzzled as to why cryptohunter suddenly appeared on the Meta/Reputation scene and started making such a fuss about all of these things.  His account is much older than mine, and even I've been here long enough to know how abrasive the culture is around here--and even aside from that, he ought to know this isn't a battle he's likely to win.  I haven't even read many posts indicating that there are any members in his corner on all of this stuff about merits and trust abuse and so forth. 

I think marlboroza's feedback is somewhat harsh given his DT status, but I know where he's coming from.  Lauda has a genuine beef with cryptohunter, so I can understand that.  Either way, cryptohunter thinks everything he's writing is completely logical but that isn't true.  It's not a big stretch for someone to say that it would be hard to trust someone who consistently demonstrates that he can't think straight. 

In any case, red trust is not a means to silence anyone--giving someone a ban is.  And since cryptohunter states that he doesn't trade here, what's the problem?


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 19, 2018, 05:32:30 AM
I'd just like to let it be known that at no time has anything been inserted into any of my orifices by any member of bitcointalk.  Specifically, I have never been penetrated by Lauda as I believe I read somewhere in this thread.  Never even had any decent offers, and I'm a pretty high-class hoe in great demand, too.

I didn't figure cryptohunter would get negged for all of his blabbering as of late, but I probably should have expected it.  Same thing happened to mixan a while back when he went off the deep end and started taking the forum hostage with his raving lunacy.  There comes a point where if you spout enough nonsense and attack too many people, it's not going to be taken kindly to anymore.  I'm a bit puzzled as to why cryptohunter suddenly appeared on the Meta/Reputation scene and started making such a fuss about all of these things.  His account is much older than mine, and even I've been here long enough to know how abrasive the culture is around here--and even aside from that, he ought to know this isn't a battle he's likely to win.  I haven't even read many posts indicating that there are any members in his corner on all of this stuff about merits and trust abuse and so forth.  

I think marlboroza's feedback is somewhat harsh given his DT status, but I know where he's coming from.  Lauda has a genuine beef with cryptohunter, so I can understand that.  Either way, cryptohunter thinks everything he's writing is completely logical but that isn't true.  It's not a big stretch for someone to say that it would be hard to trust someone who consistently demonstrates that he can't think straight.  

In any case, red trust is not a means to silence anyone--giving someone a ban is.  And since cryptohunter states that he doesn't trade here, what's the problem?

Prove any of your points... that anything I have said you can prove is incorrect. Go for it now.

I will tell you exactly why I came here because you pulled a DT abuse on someone and I will bring it here now for everyone else to examine in light of the fact you based in on your false assumption and even needed others of DT who are not abusers to rectify the damage you tried to pull on this person.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5063753.msg47613204#msg47613204
Examine this entire thread it is another case of provably incorrect assumption from DT and not backing down under scrutiny again.

However luckily there are some DT people who are open to being objective.

I though I would see what all this DT was about and what is going on with this board and a bunch of hitlers talking down to everyone and acting all superior whilst having very dubious moral compasses. I will not be getting DT neg trust for anything I have said that you can not demonstrate is wrong or untrue.



Prove anything I have written is not true NOW. Bring your evidence or you are too compounding the abuse with lies. Substantiate you claims or be next in line for trust abuse.

I am waiting. If you do not produce evidence of these allegations of

" Either way, cryptohunter thinks everything he's writing is completely logical but that isn't true.  It's not a big stretch for someone to say that it would be hard to trust someone who consistently demonstrates that he can't think straight.  "

Not that is even apparently the reason so this is again false apparently I am red for saying he misquoted me as he clearly did.

So stop conflating issues and interfering with what you can not understand.

If you can understand then produce now. With evidence. Or retract.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on December 19, 2018, 05:38:18 AM
Prove any of your points that anything I have said is raving lunacy.
There is no point in arguing with you or trying to prove anything you've said is false, because that's a conversation that will last forever.  You will rebut every point with something else that has to be debunked, ad infinitum.

I will tell you exactly why I came here because you pulled a DT abuse on someone and I will bring it here now for everyone else to examine in light of the fact you based in on your false assumption and even needed others of DT who are not abusers to rectify the damage you tried to pull on this person.
Rambotnic, right?  Go right ahead and bring it here now, just don't expect me to argue any further about it.  Sometimes DT members disagree with each other and leave counter feedback.  That's something I might have done with marlboroza's trust he left for you, but there's no way in satan's kingdom I'm leaving you a positive trust.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 19, 2018, 05:44:36 AM
Prove any of your points that anything I have said is raving lunacy.
There is no point in arguing with you or trying to prove anything you've said is false, because that's a conversation that will last forever.  You will rebut every point with something else that has to be debunked, ad infinitum.

I will tell you exactly why I came here because you pulled a DT abuse on someone and I will bring it here now for everyone else to examine in light of the fact you based in on your false assumption and even needed others of DT who are not abusers to rectify the damage you tried to pull on this person.
Rambotnic, right?  Go right ahead and bring it here now, just don't expect me to argue any further about it.  Sometimes DT members disagree with each other and leave counter feedback.  That's something I might have done with marlboroza's trust he left for you, but there's no way in satan's kingdom I'm leaving you a positive trust.

LOL you refuse to back up your false claims???

I think you deserve red trust then. It stands to reason it.... you are saying false nonsense or you could prove what you are saying is true.

Produce or retract or come under the same scrutiny I am going to bring every single abuser under even if I get 100 false red trust for examining observable events in public.

Bring proof now or retract your lies.

I do not want it balanced I want it removed for being put their under false terms in the first place.

If you stay out of my way then you would not need to go through this public and totally observable process of getting called on lies you make up about me. Proof or retract.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 19, 2018, 05:46:17 AM
you are pushing for this red trust to stick.

Actually it's quite the opposite - I was trying to figure out (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086816.msg48751487#msg48751487) if the misunderstanding about the quotes can be reconciled. However your incessant lying is getting in the way. It's between you and marlboroza. Good luck.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 19, 2018, 05:54:32 AM
you are pushing for this red trust to stick.

Actually it's quite the opposite - I was trying to figure out if the misunderstanding about the quotes can be reconciled. However your incessant lying is getting in the way. It's between you and marlboroza. Good luck.

Bring the lying proof. NOW. Where are these lies????

I can't believe honestly the corruption and collusion between people this forum is beinbg entrusted too. It is a sickening state and I am just starting to realise the extent of what they think they can get away with here and the crazy shit they can try and force people to believe.

I would invite a very close and detailed (do not rush) of all threads on meta involving me and this bunch and this thread here and the one I quoted with TP trying to even ban someone under false assumptions and lies.

Let's scrap anyone on DT who acts like this and ban them. These are hunting down 5 year old copy and paste and banning people and then abusing this board and anyone that questions anything they do with false charges and fantastical stories that we are expected to believe??

Also it has not gone unnoticed by me that these people call everyone else financially motivated and look down on them for this and then all refuse to remove their sigs if i do it aswell... for a year or even more to prove we are not here for the money and that we are enthusiasts.

How have these people infested this level of power here? kick them out and leave only the honest objective people that can justify and substantiate what they claim.





Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on December 19, 2018, 06:11:23 AM
LOL you refuse to back up your false claims???
Actually, I did a few posts back when I tried to nicely explain to you that I'm not some die-hard Dash supporter, nor did I support Lauda in that scam accusation against him/her.  I explained that I questioned the forked coins issue and also admitted that I don't fully understand what the whole transaction was about, who was involved, and what all the details are.  That was a very contentious thread with lots of people on both sides, and I decided to just stay out of it.  

Those are just two examples of untruths you've told, and I do believe other members have been pointing out other ones as this and the other threads you're involved with progress.  You're not going to agree with any of our reasoning, so it's futile.  

In addition, I've written maybe a handful of posts saying I liked Dash--but I've also said the same thing about doge, and for the same reasons, i.e., low fees and quick confirmations.  I never tried to pump either coin up for financial gain and have never had more than a few hundred bucks' worth of either in my lifetime.  You also criticized Lauda for ceasing to support Dash?  You implied that Lauda did this as a pump & dump scheme.  I don't recall this, and it's not something you've provided proof for either.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 19, 2018, 06:32:47 AM
LOL you refuse to back up your false claims???
Actually, I did a few posts back when I tried to nicely explain to you that I'm not some die-hard Dash supporter, nor did I support Lauda in that scam accusation against him/her.  I explained that I questioned the forked coins issue and also admitted that I don't fully understand what the whole transaction was about, who was involved, and what all the details are.  That was a very contentious thread with lots of people on both sides, and I decided to just stay out of it.  

Those are just two examples of untruths you've told, and I do believe other members have been pointing out other ones as this and the other threads you're involved with progress.  You're not going to agree with any of our reasoning, so it's futile.  

In addition, I've written maybe a handful of posts saying I liked Dash--but I've also said the same thing about doge, and for the same reasons, i.e., low fees and quick confirmations.  I never tried to pump either coin up for financial gain and have never had more than a few hundred bucks' worth of either in my lifetime.  You also criticized Lauda for ceasing to support Dash?  You implied that Lauda did this as a pump & dump scheme.  I don't recall this, and it's not something you've provided proof for either.

LOL so only you can make assumptions based on nothing where as I draw reasonable conclusions based on things you have said these are lies. Please get some assistance.

You had my great cake example of dash scam then said thanks for showing me I understand then went on to keep praising it several times
You said words to the effect on the lauda debacle anyone can search ...exactly what I said on the previous page. You were implying if there are no specific rules for not keeping the bch then there is nothing wrong. Why delve in and mention that if you are not supporting him just stay out of it. Unless you feel that investors who lost out on a project that failed should not get the compensation they can from someone gaining off holding their bitcoins and has already been paid enough. That is not support?  I said explain deeper or launch your own investigation if you are unsure or dont understand it.

Then you even say you just like being loyal to him (so not supporting him right) because bla bla bla reasons.
I've seen you crying on about him being removed from mod. So don;t deny you're a total asskisser to lauda simple as that. Even though you say you dont understand it all so cant know for sure if all the smoke about him with the bch is true. So how can you be loyal to someone you are not sure if was in the wrong in a potentially huge scam. So stop back peddling and producing more lies.

Lauda was an ardent dash supporter and I had many arguments where he swore and cursed and was fighting me before you hatched here and others over and over saying it was no way a scam for all the same excuses i hear here about merits being fairly shared out. Then later said okay yeah it was a scam actually.

Anyway I don't  care about lauda now he is just loving poking his nose in to stuff and knows he is in a glass house. If he stays out of my way with his nonsense I dont care to think about him at all.

So yeah bring on more lies and incorrect theories you know like accusations from other threads prior to this on meta you made. I want you to prove I am wrong about all the merit stuff and produce your evidence ... not some junk about yourself that you can excuse and backpeddle on.









Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on December 19, 2018, 06:44:27 AM
I want you to prove I am wrong about all the merit stuff and produce your evidence ... not some junk about yourself that you can excuse and backpeddle on.
See, this is where the "it will never end" part comes into play.  Now you want me to refute whatever it is you wrote about the merit system (which I haven't been following, since I don't really care if most of my merits come from just a few members).  That's another debate I just don't have any interest in.  I only care who I give merits to, and I'm trying to disperse them as far and wide as I can.   

And yeah, I do think it's a pity that Lauda was removed from DT.  But you claimed I supported Lauda in the scam accusation thread specifically and that is not true.  You're constantly shifting goal posts and are now saying I'm a liar about denying that I support Lauda in general.  This is the lunacy I'm referring to.

No point in continuing this for me, so I am d-o-n-e.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 19, 2018, 07:19:31 AM
I want you to prove I am wrong about all the merit stuff and produce your evidence ... not some junk about yourself that you can excuse and backpeddle on.
See, this is where the "it will never end" part comes into play.  Now you want me to refute whatever it is you wrote about the merit system (which I haven't been following, since I don't really care if most of my merits come from just a few members).  That's another debate I just don't have any interest in.  I only care who I give merits to, and I'm trying to disperse them as far and wide as I can.  

And yeah, I do think it's a pity that Lauda was removed from DT.  But you claimed I supported Lauda in the scam accusation thread specifically and that is not true.  You're constantly shifting goal posts and are now saying I'm a liar about denying that I support Lauda in general.  This is the lunacy I'm referring to.

No point in continuing this for me, so I am d-o-n-e.

1. are you denying that you said that concerning the lauda bch debacle or ? are you trying to say you said it but not on the accusation thread (which is a pathetic cop out) yes or no?

2. are you denying you have posted in the merit threads opposing my views and making unsubstantiated statments and have been following those threads and meriting things there specifically comments that are trying to refute what I am saying? yes or no

3. are you claiming you want lauda back as dt even though you are unsure of his wrong doing because you dont understand it all yes or no?

There is every point in continuing. I sense fear of scrutiny of your actions which is usually because of wrong doing or being unsure about what you have previously posted.

Bring such moon back here because also he is not answering any questions and has ran off. I am still totally curious of why that specific line was highlighted in his strange video. Usually I can not shake him off.

I want him to run me through his entire though process during that exchange starting with me saying marlboroza is misquoting me. Since that video is strange and there is no reason to highlight that line at all. It has nothing to do with it any kind of misquoting at all.

You should obviously keep your nose out of things you do not understand or refrain from making comments that you can not substantiate when asked. Then there would be no reason for you to experience this scrutiny.



Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: o_e_l_e_o on December 19, 2018, 07:31:38 AM
Please stop pretending you are just accidentally browsing random search engines and not stalking down my every thread. I would never invite you to spam your sig whilst pretending to make worthwhile comment.

You really go searching for your own username in search engines with the exact same mispelling as mine.... sounds like a usual excuses I hear in meta.
This was clearly sarcasm.


Are you seriously telling me he was aiming quoting something you didnt go near mentioning? ... get real. Nobody could accept that explanation because you never said anything like that.
The use of the quotation marks was clearly "scare quotes" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scare_quotes), and not as a direct quote of something anybody said.


This is diabolical and worse that 300lbs of DT abuse
This was clearly a joke.


So people can get red trust for saying lemon without it being an abuse of the trust system?
This was clearly a metaphor.


I think part of the problem here is that cryptohunter, being (I presume) a non-native English speaker, is literally taking everything, well, literally. When you re-read everything with this mindset, it is easier to see how this misunderstanding arose and escalated. Perhaps with this in mind, we can all come to an agreeable solution. Having said that cryptohunter, you are not helping yourself by continuing to rage at people who are trying to help you (e.g. suchmoon and The Pharmacist).



I want him to run me through his entire though process during that exchange starting with me saying marlboroza is misquoting me.

1 - marlboroza made a post here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086297.40) containing two direct quotes from you, as well as a couple of "scare quotes" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scare_quotes).

2 - You then stated he was:
pretending to quote me when I never said that at all.

3 - Everyone assumed you were talking about the actual quotes, and so suchmoon made a video showing that you click on the quotes and it will bring you directly to the posts where you said the quoted text.

4 - A couple of posts later, you elaborated that it was the "scare quotes" you were objecting to, which no one ever claimed were said by you (or anybody else for that matter).

5 - The confusion was cleared up.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: eddie13 on December 19, 2018, 08:04:42 AM
https://i.imgur.com/y16pHsW.png?1
Ref
https://i.imgur.com/cI6NUgg.png?1

Really?



Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: Lauda on December 19, 2018, 08:13:38 AM
-snip-
Really?
When you start chronically posting lies and attacking anyone that disagrees with you left and right, what exactly did you expect was going to happen? That this is going to be considered trustworthy behavior? I'm actually surprised how lenient certain members are depending on who is making these kinds of statements. Psycho bitch was being attacked for the tiniest mistakes during certain periods. ::) Don't play dumb eddie.

I'm waiting for marlbozora's trust abuse thread. Welp, it's already here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086816.0).


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 19, 2018, 08:17:09 AM
Please stop pretending you are just accidentally browsing random search engines and not stalking down my every thread. I would never invite you to spam your sig whilst pretending to make worthwhile comment.

You really go searching for your own username in search engines with the exact same mispelling as mine.... sounds like a usual excuses I hear in meta.
This was clearly sarcasm.


Are you seriously telling me he was aiming quoting something you didnt go near mentioning? ... get real. Nobody could accept that explanation because you never said anything like that.
The use of the quotation marks was clearly "scare quotes" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scare_quotes), and not as a direct quote of something anybody said.


This is diabolical and worse that 300lbs of DT abuse
This was clearly a joke.


So people can get red trust for saying lemon without it being an abuse of the trust system?
This was clearly a metaphor.


I think part of the problem here is that cryptohunter, being (I presume) a non-native English speaker, is literally taking everything, well, literally. When you re-read everything with this mindset, it is easier to see how this misunderstanding arose and escalated. Perhaps with this in mind, we can all come to an agreeable solution. Having said that cryptohunter, you are not helping yourself by continuing to rage at people who are trying to help you (e.g. suchmoon and The Pharmacist).



I want him to run me through his entire though process during that exchange starting with me saying marlboroza is misquoting me.

1 - marlboroza made a post here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086297.40) containing two direct quotes from you, as well as a couple of "scare quotes" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scare_quotes).

2 - You then stated he was:
pretending to quote me when I never said that at all.

3 - Everyone assumed you were talking about the actual quotes, and so suchmoon made a video showing that you click on the quotes and it will bring you directly to the posts where you said the quoted text.

4 - A couple of posts later, you elaborated that it was the "scare quotes" you were objecting to, which no one ever claimed were said by you (or anybody else for that matter).

5 - The confusion was cleared up.

I want everyone to examine this carefully and closely .... this is now what i see happened here and it is clear.....


I appreciate your actually trying to help get a sensible conclusion.. also you can ask salty himself but i think he is serious when he says if people choose to give you neg trust for liking a lemon that is not abuse. This is not a metaphor he straight up means that. Ask him and see what he says about this lemon example he gave. He straight up means that is not abuse of DT trust or the trust system.

Anyway to explore this nonsense deeper step by step....

Walk through the observable events step by step starting with malboroza showing up...and what exactly he quotes of mine and what he replies to those quotes specifically and end with the video and the highlighted text.

Step 1

malboroza comes after reading the thread where i said

a. lauda should get more red tags
b. tp is asskissing up to lauda.
C. Can't wait for suchmoon and malborozo to have theirs done too....weeeee down the snakes and ladders..


malboroza now sees all of this together... and says this

Quote from: cryptohunter on 17-12-2018, 22:51:37

I accidentally mistype my forum nick on one strange unknown search engine which I can't remember which one it was and I was pointed to this post:
Quote from: cryptohunter on 18-12-2018, 17:14:42
Can't wait for suchmoon and malborozo to have theirs done too....
...so thank you for inviting me to this valuable and sensible discussion which moved from "cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers" to "tag Lauda!" and "Lauda stuck it in TP's ass "


--------------------------------------------------

So that is all he said.... now think about that he is replying specifically to where i say i can't wait for suchmoon and malboroza have theirs done too weee snakes and ladders ....  so why is he responding to exactly that comment with ass sex comments??? I mean why to that specific sentence. He is assuming I am saying i can;t wait for them to be done with ass sex too with laudas snake or whatever he is obviously like fox pup always going on about homo erotica they like to talk about I mean I am not against what they want to talk about or do but don't quote me as saying this stuff i never said. I mean there is no other explanation for this at all to reply to that exact sentence of mine with that reply he made. that actually was in reference to them getting their merits put through the minus top 10 filter like the others had just gone through. So that comment was nothing to do ass or lauda snakes in anyway as i clearly intended it.

He has made some false connection about it all based on Tp ass"something" lauda and can't wait for suchmoon and malboroza to get theirs done too snakes and .....  There is no other viable reason why he would reply to that specific sentence out of hundred i made with that specific remark about The Pharmacist getting it from lauda in his ass. Marborozas WORDS not mine. I never even mentioned anything sexually explicit at all.


NEXT...

Now so when I reply....

with this

@suchmoon
nothing of substance

@malborozo

Describing disturbing fantasies of his own and pretending to quote me when I never said that at all.

I mean there is nothing else that malboroza said that I can be referring to as disturbing fantasies in his post.


NEXT

such moon quotes exactly this

Quote from: cryptohunter on Today at 00:32:39
Describing disturbing fantasies of his own and pretending to quote me when I never said that at all.

You do realize that one can click on the quote and go to the post where you actually said that?

He is making the same assumption. He knows I can only be refering to malborozas ass sex reference there is nothing else disturbing fantasies could relate to in his post. What else in that post is a disturbing fantasy?? nothing there at all that is obviously what I meant and he knows this. Else tell me what else is a disturbing fantasy in that post?? does he have a disturbing fantasy at red tagging lauda? no besides I already clearly did say that so not that. There is nothing else that could qualify for a disturbing fantasy in that post malboroza made at all.

NEXT

I tell such moon to bring evidence I had orginally said that ... obviously about lauda banging Tp in the ass since that is all I could mean by a disturbing fantasy



NEXT

The video such moon creates?

Now this is so weird.

He is meant to be substantiating this dont forget since he precisely quotes it

that i had been Describing disturbing fantasies of his own and pretending to quote me when I never said that at all ,,,,this is what he quotes specifically. so he knows I am refuting i said about tp and lauda ass sex


You do realize that one can click on the quote and go to the post where you actually said that (he thinks he will prove by showing i said i want it to happen to suchmoon and malboroza and thinking about TP and ass "something was it kissing or ass banging" he is confused? says such moon.... then brings his proof. Well he thinks it is proof but proof of what in this specific context??

the thing he highlights in the video is  again I cant wait for suchmoon and malboroza to get theirs done ....weeeee snakes and ladders

why is he quoting that line to prove I did say what malboroza misquoted about tp and that disturbing fantasy of tp/laudas ass banging

Follow it is quite clear if if you read their precise quotes and precise replies "they got the wrong end of the stick so to speak " lol

They remembered me saying tp ass "something" lauda... they see me saying cant wait to such moon and malboroza get theirs done too weeee snakes and ladders ...and make a false connection simple as that. Then try to turn this on me when I said i never even said this and I was being misquoted. I would not go so explicit as full assfucking The pharmacist at all from lauda. I feel jokes are okay but kids can read this board so not too explicit but i mean they said it all now so kids dont read this thread... He specifically mentions lauda fucking the pharmacist in his ass and quotes it right next to my other quote. Now they try to say they were not quoting me but perhaps suchmoon or nobody.

Can;t wait for such moon and malboroza to get theirs done too.....weeeee snakes and ladders as proof i did say something like that.

Anyone deeply analysing it can see no other reason for suchmoons video highlighting of that line? what else does it show relating to malborozas disturbing fantasies with lauda and the pharmacist.




Suchmoon come here and explain this at once. I want to hear your entire thought process and every reply to every single thing you quoted and specifically replied to those quotes.. and you malboroza.

This invented bullshit story they thought I mean something else bring it and explain the video and the replies to specific quotes you posted. What else is there that I could have realistically meant? the entire thing is more time travel and i googled my name spelled wrong on a search engine i cant remember. This kind of nonsense is good for banter but this is not for red trust when you are DT.

Any person working through this slowly and picking what they are quoting of mine precisely and what they are replying to those quotes is quite straight forward.

I mean of course this is all nonsense from them. But even imagine (it is not real) that I did by mistake say to malboroza I did not say something i really did. He should just quote this and prove me wrong not give me red trust. I mean that is if there was a mistake and it was my fault for making it by some error then you do not get red trust for saying you did not say something you did by a mistake???


I want my trust restored to normal Or an alternative and sensible explanation with details on every single aspect.




@Lauda present evidence for these lies or stfu i see neg trust mania on yours from old members who can see through your devious  ways.

Bring these lies to light right now. Bring these attacks that are un called for on people that were just minding their own business and I dont mean people attacking me first.

another one with nothing to bring forth. Now bring the lies, and bring the attacks that were not deserving having attacked me first.



Hurry up.

I am having some very interesting conversations with ppl who gave you negative trust already. Don't keep bugging me with your unsubstantiated nonsense because I will divert a lot of time to a new thread on you. Perhaps you have been tarnished beyond what you deserve but I will help you get redemption if you deserve it .... then again if it is worse than we though....oh dear. I suspect the latter but I am not essentially interested in you right now since you have already fallen from grace. So don't make me become more interested.

That is not a threat at all that is simply an offer of publicaly reaching a fair assessment of yourself If you have no big skeletons then nothing to worry about. Maybe you will benefit. perhaps  not.

Or vanish and I may just forget about wasting my time on you for now.

Am I attacking you or are you coming to comment on my threads and attacking me with unsubstantiated claims when I could not give a shit where you are or what you doing. So please vanish back to the swamp.



@ eddie13 - thanks :)

the entire thing is insane and needs to reach all parts of this board to let people know what is happening with this DT trust nonsense being given out on a whim for provable errors on the DT part..  This is 2 times now I have seen it recently .... provably given on the basis of mistake of the DT.

If this thread is deleted more proof of them hiding the fact they are setting me up with

1. an unbelievable story
2. even if anyone could believe their crazy story from start to finish. You do not get red trust for saying you are misquoting me on the thread they are meant to be doing it. They simply prove they are not.
3. They have motive because I mentioned that trust is subjective and is cycled amongst a few at the top it just so happens Malboroza was shown by locye to be the most narrowly cycled of all. Not my fault this is data and I never even requested top 50. Also i never pointed it out before now although I was at times itching to point it out when he kept sniping at me in my threads and then not substantiating of qualifying his snipes. I still did not mention he was number 1 of all the intensely cycled merits so far.

Now remove my red trust or modify suchmoons events because they are not beleivable and he made a mistake and so did you.
Stop hiding behind you DT trust and present yourself with your side.

Also very worth noting

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086816.msg48751290#msg48751290

suchmoon claims malboroza is not red trusting for any merit nonsense.

look at the bottom of the post before I get red trust.... he is still clearly very annoyed about this entire trust thing with him getting number 1 score on the top 50 removal

he tells me to tell theymos he must remove his 50 point score. I actually would have never spoken to malboroza if he had not come for me about merit on the threads.... .also even though previously i noted to myself he was the one who was reduced the most from the top 50 removal I did not mention it to him at all even after he kept sniping me in every thread and tracking me down. Even here tracking me and saying it was some search engine incorrect name crap. Even then. Now after getting red trust I finally have to demonstrate why the trust thing is annoying him so much. Although on several occasions i have praised him for things he never tries ever to say one nice thing back.
Merit to some people is a very touchy subject it seems. Don;t dare pull stats they don;t like pulling over and over themselves because it it does not prove how popular or recognised or how good of a poster they are they don;t like those things being questioned and even logically denied.

Sorry but it is true. Just don't worry about it. If you want to believe 2500 merits make you the best poster you can. The fact it is probably not true (i mean it could be) should not stand in your way if you dont want it to.



Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: LoyceMobile on December 19, 2018, 09:11:44 AM
Cryptohunter, how come you're asking several people to back up their claims with evidence, while you don't do that for the claims you make?


I'm tempted to list the Top200 Merit Receivers minus their Top10 Merit Fans. I'm curious to see what comes out, especially considering theymos' recommendation to use up all source Merits on good posts.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 19, 2018, 09:26:13 AM
Cryptohunter, how come you're asking several people to back up their claims with evidence, while you don't do that for the claims you make?


I'm tempted to list the Top200 Merit Receivers minus their Top10 Merit Fans. I'm curious to see what comes out, especially considering theymos' recommendation to use up all source Merits on good posts.

Not this confused sole. I thought I am on ignore... off ignore ....on again.

Don't be just tempted there are merits waiting for this new idea that you had after reading my threads again.

I mean don't say thanks for those last 20 you got from doing as I told you and that I had already presented many times (not my own work r1s2g3

Bring the claim that I have left unsubstantiated or without corroborating events OR ADMIT YOU ARE LYING THAT I DO SUCH THINGS THERE ARE ONLY 2 OPTIONS PICK 1

Don't be coy

Well we know some lose a huge amount so that's nothing new. I know lauda for one will drop down a several 100 merits LOL

Why the temptation now though? is it so malboroza will not be number 1 reduced of the entire board on the smallests analysed subset??

Sorry his claim to fame will remain we can have a new winner after he has deleted his negs on my account. Because he is going to never ever hear the end of it until he does. He is hiding now concocting some more unbelievable tales I expect. I kind wait to see him again for his complete explanation of how DT gives out neg trust . I will walk with him through his entire thought process to fully understand the DT neg trust he gave.... in public for full public analysis. Then we can see what type of person he really is. Remove this trust after you see you made the mistake not me and I will let it slide. This needs to happen in 24hours or else I will not stop insisting he is removed from DT trust on the basis of being dishonest and him and suchmoon making up some elaborate story to blame me.

If he has a good reason that stands up to sensible scrutiny. No more time travel no more bookmarked my friends ran out of merit so saved them up for one big spree. Not seeking you out but that strange mispelling I made on that search engine i forgot which one.  I like the banter, I like the jokes but when you are giving RED TRUST for no sensible or fair reason. There is need for sensible disclosure and full explanation in detail else this is an abuse and grossly unfair. No more saying unbelievable and crazy nonsense and expecting no comeback or questioning to find out a sensible truthful answer.

He made the mistake , such moon misunderstood the entire thing so called me out incorrectly  ...... they need to realise this and do the right thing. They never tried to correct me (because i was not wrong it was a quite reasonable conclusion i reached in this context) simply went straight to RED TRUST ..... No way that is sliding. If these events do not do the trick when presented now or tomorrow or another time or another time. His judgement will be questioned and measured against this abuse due to his own strange interpretations in this thread and trying to blame me for his strange thoughts. I will always bring it up with him and I mean always at every opinion he give I will correctly and honestly warn people that they must realised they are dealing with a dishonest abuser of the trust system. Those opinions need to be viewed with that in mind. It is fair disclosure. I will not be stalking him I will just search on some search engine for some words he may have used in a row... i forget which one now and boom there he is for me to start commenting on like he does with me.




Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: actmyname on December 19, 2018, 02:14:59 PM
What is going on? I thought this was supposed to be about the top 200 merit receivers, not a cesspool of character attacks.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 19, 2018, 02:23:47 PM
What is going on? I thought this was supposed to be about the top 200 merit receivers, not a cesspool of character attacks.

well the salient and important part is

marboroza is clearly misquoting me as saying " lauda ass banged the pharmacist"

Then when I complain and said I merely provided evidence that he was ass kissing up to him and never said anything like his distrubing fantasies he gave me red trust for saying I am lying  and such moon tried to provide evidence of such. but just showed a statement from me talking about seeing their stats analysed in the same way the others had.

It is now observable I never even said what malboroza quoted  and they got the wrong end of the stick but they still want to red trust me and such moon says it is nothing to do with any merit nonsense of analysing stats but clearly by his post you can see at the end he is still upset at me when i never asked for the top 50 to be removed loyce did it on his own steam.

If you were hoping for anything new about top 200 merits there is Nothing new here apart from some new calculations that show some people lose over 50% hundred of merits if 10 persons only are prevented from giving theirs.

The rest is lauda telling me that I am a liar and lying compulsively and not providing evidence to substantiate his claims.
Me telling lauda he is a scam enabler and looks like a scammer
TP telling me he is not sure if lauder has done wrong but supports him anyway cos he is loyal.

thats about it really but I am trying to force a reason for my red trust that i can see is not a plan to crush me from talking

WOW thanks for that trust to help balance this I very much appreciate this.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: actmyname on December 19, 2018, 02:31:48 PM
marboroza is clearly misquoting me as saying " lauda ass banged the pharmacist"
I believe what you're on about is contained in the following:

...so thank you for inviting me to this valuable and sensible discussion which moved from "cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers" to "tag Lauda!" and "Lauda stuck it in TP's ass "

To believe that this is an intentionally-contrived misquote is wrong. This is a synopsis of the flow of conversation in the thread dialogue. I see no attack here.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 19, 2018, 03:29:12 PM
you are pushing for this red trust to stick.

Actually it's quite the opposite - I was trying to figure out if the misunderstanding about the quotes can be reconciled. However your incessant lying is getting in the way. It's between you and marlboroza. Good luck.

Bring the lying proof. NOW. Where are these lies????

It's literally in the post you quoted. You said I'm pushing for the red trust to stick despite my efforts to do the opposite. That's just the latest example (at the time of me reading this post; it's quite likely you did some more lying in the posts I haven't read yet).



Edit:

Suchmoon come here and explain this at once. I want to hear your entire thought process and every reply to every single thing you quoted and specifically replied to those quotes..

I know this is futile but since you asked so nicely...

In your post here you didn't specify which text you consider misquoted:

Describing disturbing fantasies of his own and pretending to quote me when I never said that at all.

So I assumed you meant the actual quotes created with the quote button, the ones in neat little boxes with author's name and date like I used just above. Not the stuff between double quotation marks. It looks like I was not the only one to interpret it that way, in fact I haven't seen anyone else yet supporting your assertion that marlboroza was attempting to attribute the text between double quotation marks to you.

That's why I replied:

You do realize that one can click on the quote and go to the post where you actually said that?

This would not make sense in any other context. Clicking on the text between double quotation marks wouldn't lead you anywhere. Clicking on the title of the boxed quote opens the original post.

Marlboroza's reference link leads to the same post so I can only assume that he also thinks you're talking about the boxed quotes.

But when you posted this:

He miss quoted me in "" also on purpose and you said you could present where I said it ... bring your evidence of accusation or delete your lie  also.

I realized you are referring to the double quotation marks and suggested this:

You seem to be confused about the double quotes. If that's the case, retract your statement and let marlboroza know. The text in double quotes is not attributed to you in any plausible way that I can see.

Instead you chose to engage in a massive attack on everything and everybody that doesn't align with your conspiracy theory.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 19, 2018, 04:36:09 PM
marboroza is clearly misquoting me as saying " lauda ass banged the pharmacist"
I believe what you're on about is contained in the following:

...so thank you for inviting me to this valuable and sensible discussion which moved from "cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers" to "tag Lauda!" and "Lauda stuck it in TP's ass "

To believe that this is an intentionally-contrived misquote is wrong. This is a synopsis of the flow of conversation in the thread dialogue. I see no attack here.

So do you mean to say he is not quoting me there? or he is? who is he quoting and why is it right next to my first quote that is from me?
and why is it related to PT ass kissing lauda?

I need to walk through this entire thing step by step because i accept what you say if you know how to analyse this from some english language rules.

but let me accept that for a moment if we are going by the rules of English language only and not employing any other context or other plausible explanations that I think have considerable reason to lead me to believe he was refering to my first comment and my second comment.


2. so then I say it is a misquote and I do not  mange to convey to him enough clues to dictate clearly what I am refering too..... and even specify the quote I am refering to is : Describing disturbing fantasies of his own... this is clear indication of what I am refering to even if he was not quoting me as i believed he was I mean you can't get DT trust for not making it clear to him what I was taking about even after a good effort where any reasonable person would assume in light of the content of what i said it would apply to that quotation... i mean even then if they are unable to understand and make an incorrect assumption you can not get NEG DT for it can you?

I mean if I am getting a red trust for apparently lying or false accuasation ...then surely to say I am lying or accusing you must first understand and make clear to yourself what it is I am saying is the focus of my lie or accusation. I give clear indication of what that must be. How can anyone assume from my statement I could be refering to any other statement he made there in his paragraph I mean by common sense he only said a couple of things so for me to refer to the one i mean as... Describing disturbing fantasies of his own? logic dictates i am refering to the ass banging commment.

3. So we are in a position now that even if I accept (which honestly I believe he was but for this debate but accept i could be wrong) he is not clear about what I am refering to even though I make it very clear i believe by saying Describing disturbing fantasies of his own. So for him to charge me with lying or false accusation he needs to be very clear on what I mean and so since he is not clearly.. then he can not as yet say I am lying or making false accusation? he needs to make sure of what i am saying as much as i should have (and did make an effort to understand what he was refering too)

I am clearly not saying what he thinks i am saying ....he does not seek to make get clarity and rather decides to believe in the face of common sense and all logic that I am actually objecting to him pressing the quote button and presenting that which i just typed 5 seconds before which i can see infront of me right then that i just wrote? does he believe I am saying I never said that? I mean that seems completely crazy. I can see it there an so can everyone else and why on earth 1/ would i refute it it is there in black and white and 2/ it is not a Describing disturbing fantasies of his own? i mean that should be totally illogical to think i am refering to that quote. I am to blame for someone quite illogically for 2 clear reasons jumping to an incorrect assumption.

So of course to give red trust without even establishing my objection and going for the totally illogical option instead of clarifying with me is deserving of me getting red trust in his books?

People believe this is true.

I mean my plausible step by step (not that it actually matters at the crux as much as establishing what someone is referring to before accusing them of lying) is countered by suchmoon saying he believed all along I was saying  I did not write what everyone just saw me write and was there in black and white in the box in malborozas post? in front of me in black and white... this is the one he really believes??

Are you being serious such moon did you believe this ??

So because you do not clarify to which quote i am referring to even after my disturbing fantasies clear indication you decide to assume I am lying or making false accusation? based on your incorrect assumption ? and therefore I get RED TRUST??

Get real.

Even if (which seems crazy) I am making an incorrect assumption( lets say i did )

I immediately refute this incorrect statement and will get to the bottom of this nonsense and clear up exactly why he said this. This is the sensible route to establish ...why he is saying i said that, and also to get him to argue his point and change it if it is incorrect . I mean I know i did not say that but perhaps he is confused perhaps he thinks i said it but got it wrong, perhaps anything. So now starts the lets establish what you mean why you said it and get to the truth.

He does nothing wrong assumption red trust? on minor thing... why???

Simply because even though in the meta thread suchmoon claims it is not related to merits.

The corroborating evidence below the final post  on this thread by malboroza just before red trust is clearly still anger over this merit business.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086297.msg48750243#msg48750243

I mean he appears from that mispelling in his secret search engine regarding his name just after I say I cant wait for malboroza and such moon to have their scores adjusted for the top 10

Either malboroza gives out red trust usually without clarifying or discussing what someone means first??? or he just wanted excuse to give me red trust for the merit thing he is annoyed over.

There is very strong evidence here it is the latter. Unless anyone can provide examples of red trust for something like this from him before.


I mean to such moon my conspiracy theory which has logical steps and if he can break those steps with hard evidence that is not the case or a probable explanation at any step I will be interested. I mean this link thing yes one small detail but totally out gunned by many other unreasonable illogical assumptions one must make to believe I was

1. denying something that everyone can see i just typed on that very same page that he just put in that exact post and he expects me to believe i was refuting i had just written that and staring me in the face?

2. saying that those quotes in box quotes were his "disturbing fantasies"

this is again like the time travel and other ludicrous and highly unlikely and improbable stuff he always comes out with.

I am certainly not accepting you could possibly believe this you knew full well I was referring as a disturbing fantasy ...to lauda ass banging the pharmacist. Not some boxed quotes that had nothing to do with that.

















Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 19, 2018, 05:20:47 PM
Are you being serious such moon did you believe this ??
Yes.

So because you do not clarify to which quote i am referring to even after my disturbing fantasies clear indication you decide to assume I am lying or making false accusation? based on your incorrect assumption ? and therefore I get RED TRUST??
That's why I suggested immediately after I realized the issue with double quotation marks that you retract your ambiguous statement.

The corroborating evidence below the final post just before red trust is clearly still anger over this merit business.

Either malboroza gives out red trust usually without clarifying or discussing what someone means??? or he just wanted excuse to give me red trust for this.
It's very difficult to clarify anything with you since you go on multi-page rants where one sentence would suffice. You mistakenly assumed the text between double quotation marks is attributed to you. Can we agree on that?


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 19, 2018, 05:30:34 PM
Are you being serious such moon did you believe this ??
Yes.

So because you do not clarify to which quote i am referring to even after my disturbing fantasies clear indication you decide to assume I am lying or making false accusation? based on your incorrect assumption ? and therefore I get RED TRUST??
That's why I suggested immediately after I realized the issue with double quotation marks that you retract your ambiguous statement.

The corroborating evidence below the final post just before red trust is clearly still anger over this merit business.

Either malboroza gives out red trust usually without clarifying or discussing what someone means??? or he just wanted excuse to give me red trust for this.
It's very difficult to clarify anything with you since you go on multi-page rants where one sentence would suffice. You mistakenly assumed the text between double quotation marks is attributed to you. Can we agree on that?

Why would i retract an ambiguous statement I would simply clarify my statement even more clearly than I though it needed for any sensible person to understand what it is I am refering to.

Anyway you want to give red trust for lies you must be clear what the person is referring too the onus is on you to get all details in line to make the optimal decision. That is why people are DT. The optimal decision was based on a ludicrous assumption.

I made clear effort to point you to the quote I was referring too I am not sure why you would assume at all it related to any other quoted statement. If you were not clear because any human would doubt someone would 1. deny what they just typed in public that is still there staring at them having just been quoted in public.  2. that the thing i describe as distrubing fantasy does not seem to fit with this these quotes.





Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 19, 2018, 05:38:31 PM
Why would i retract an ambiguous statement I would simply clarify my statement even more clearly than I though it needed for any sensible person to understand what it is I am refering to.
Because the statement is incorrect if marlboroza wasn't pretending to quote you.

Describing disturbing fantasies of his own and pretending to quote me when I never said that at all.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 19, 2018, 10:00:58 PM
Why would i retract an ambiguous statement I would simply clarify my statement even more clearly than I though it needed for any sensible person to understand what it is I am refering to.
Because the statement is incorrect if marlboroza wasn't pretending to quote you.

Describing disturbing fantasies of his own and pretending to quote me when I never said that at all.

I would clarify my statement... it is irrelevant if I am incorrect in my assumption ...he just needs to then explain later he was not intending to quote me at all these were special super "" which means nobody said it. That is what debate and discussion is for you get on the same page the more you discuss.

You dont assume run off and give red trust.

Then even when you know full well it was his later false assumption that finally led to the red trust then he should reverse it.

The guy is asking to be removed from default trust and wants his merits reduced from the top 200 ... he is losing it.

Just tell him to remove the the red trust at once else have to answer for his actions will full explanation.

He is hiding and did not even offer an explanation to match the link he left and the description.

where is he hiding up and why are you here testing out arguments on his behalf instruct him here at once please It is disgraceful his incorrect assumptions finally led to my incorrect red trust and he just avoids and dodges me and will not even come and talk to me himself.

He is only adding to the obvious conclusion he has made a  mistake and will not fix it even though he should if he is not seen to be abusing  the trust system.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 21, 2018, 08:48:15 PM
Which one of you miscreants did this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg48790244#msg48790244

Hopefully cryptohunter will stop by to explain what's going on here.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: LoyceV on December 21, 2018, 09:25:45 PM
Which one of you miscreants did this
Wasn't me :D I didn't even see that post, even though I merited the post right below it.
I guess that explains why he opened this topic:     
Let us devise a Sensible solution to Copy and Paste situation.  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5087667.0) just 6 hours after ScumBuster busted him!

I was wondering why cryptohunter would be attacking DT and quality posters, while at the same time trying to get copy/pasters unbanned.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on December 21, 2018, 09:30:52 PM
I was wondering why cryptohunter would be attacking DT and quality posters, while at the same time trying to get copy/pasters unbanned.
This is turning out to be one of those times where my brain feels like every neuron has been twisted into a pretzel.  Fortunately I can still wiggle my toes.

My guess is that we'll soon find out if cryptohunter hails from the Dindu tribe, very common on bitcointalk.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 21, 2018, 09:34:54 PM
Looks like sockpuppets are being deployed to... uhm... not sure what the purpose is, to make a mockery of the discussion?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5087992.msg48809393#msg48809393

https://meem.link/i/a/kV6C9T.jpg
Edited 2020-11-30 to fix a broken image


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: o_e_l_e_o on December 21, 2018, 10:11:18 PM
This drama just keeps getting better. This is far better entertainment than any TV show. Genuinely laughed out loud at the "Dindu tribe".


Which one of you miscreants did this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg48790244#msg48790244
Since I seemed to get left out of the whole weird sex thing that was going on earlier...:

https://i.imgur.com/SORAxWZ.gif


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: LoyceV on December 21, 2018, 10:15:39 PM
This drama just keeps getting better.
It's an unexpected (for me at least) plot twist.
But he didn't get banned, unlike the ones reported one post lower (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg48791285#msg48791285). I can only speculate why.

I assume cryptohunter will put his money where his mouth is, and pay 0.5 BTC for his ban appeal when that happens?
1. anyone wants to appeal after copy and paste of serious nature found in their posts (not film quotes for humour, memes, news posted on correct project)
Needs to pay 0.5 BTC fine and have a 6months - 1yr month sig ban automatically..


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 21, 2018, 11:10:57 PM
I guess that explains why he opened this topic:     
Let us devise a Sensible solution to Copy and Paste situation.  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5087667.0) just 6 hours after ScumBuster busted him!

But he didn't get banned, unlike the ones reported one post lower (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg48791285#msg48791285). I can only speculate why.

Maybe that's why hilarious started his thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5087992) too, being torn by the existential decision - to ban or not to ban :)

I'm also amazed at the change in cryptohunter's tone from the complete madness in marlboroza's dispute to the much more eloquent "concerned citizen" voice in the copy-pasta treads today.

Now let me unroll that tinfoil... ok, my headgear is looking good and shiny...

https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BYWFjYjIxOTYtYmM3Zi00NjVjLWFjNjgtMjU4NWRkN2NhNmQwXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyODE3MDg1OTE@._V1_UY268_CR148,0,182,268_AL_.jpg

so yeah, my conspiracy theory is that cryptohunter reported herself for plagiarism in order to deflect: "look, it's just a few harmless posts, and someone is out to get me, and they definitely looked through ALL my posts, and that's all they've found, don't go looking for more and don't ban me". These quotation marks don't represent an actual statement... ah fuck it, who cares.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 21, 2018, 11:25:07 PM
You all just made a very big mistake.
It will all become very clear soon.

Yeah because instead of deleting it i decided to draw huge attention to myself so  you would all focus on my profile and  the subject of copy and paste.

Get ready to be fried alive jackals. Come to meta when you are ready.

I mean how bad does it look after abusing the DT trust and now a unknown unheard of piece of shit puppet account tries to get me banned but because you are all so retarded that you have added only weight to my clear case you are a gang of jackals that has been waiting for a Lion to destroy and reduce you to the snivelling little dregs of this board you are.

Can you imagine how 10 of you jackals has not even once EVER won some argument here against me NOT once whilst clearly lying , meriting illogical drivel and being reduced to excuses like time machines. I have crushed you in public like ants.

Bring me one just one instance where you have defeated me since I have found out about this bunch of bullies you are and started to highlight how gross this entire situation is turning.

You are a cowards not even daring to use your own account to try to report me. I wonder how long you all poured over my account crying at night to find something...just something...

Can you imagine if you were going to prove anyone was net negative here it could never be me.

I mean just 1 of my accomplishments here was to break the dash scam myself and take on their bunch of jackals then joined by others it was the largest war on the alt coin board ever. There were 5 threads concurently on the first page for days and weeks people joined me and we together forced evan duffield to go against his own scamming generals and offer and AIRDROP worth BILLIONS to this board at its peak. I was blamed by many for this and of course I should have been. I broke it and highlighted the disgusting nature of their central bunch of self serving scum ....

I relish these events with groups of jackals like you.

The reason I will not be banned for that and the reason I have never bothered to go delete anything from my post history since highlighting the bullying scum here is because I know I have never done anything wrong.

What sort of dumb cowards would

1. TRY to abuse red trust on me
2. 1 day later when they see I smashed that back in their face try to set up a brand new account to report to try to silence me again with a ban.
3. PICK just 1 of my accomplishments here that dwarfs all of your accomplishments (which are playing whack amole and bully the weaker person here ) I mean you pick that topic. You want to highlight that I broke the biggest scam on this board and blamed by dashers for fragementing their scam and forcing their scamming leader to offer an air drop worth BILLIONS? you want to use that top to try to demonstrate I am net negative. That is one of many but perhaps my best one.

You could use that argument to quite reasonably stretch to  I am the person who started the movement that prevented bitcoin in its history being removed from the top position - many people have said if this had never blown up and the entire community had not been split over the dash captive instamine scam - which lauda and pharmacist can be demonstrated to have supported  then dash would have got beyond position 2.

You wish to pick to highlight that you dumb ass fools to say I am net negative and wonder why I am not banned already??

That is just one of the huge scams I have been first to highlight and bring total anarchy and wars over in the ALT section.

I mean can not even wonder what I could do to turn net negative here.

However if you add up every huge scam and every argument I have had with scammers and their wolves it will not be as great to me as having you all taken from positions of trust and power.

You dumb asses don't even realise that all of those posts have a link to the original quote at the bottom. This is such a fucking weak piece of shit you present like cowards under a fake brand new account.

Do you know I have never lost one argument ever on this board against people 20x smarter than you and 10x smarter than myself.

Why have I never lost?

I PRESENT THE TRUTH - does not matter how smart you are does not matter how much you try to twist and turn and bring the argument away from the truth I will bring you back and I will crush you with facts and observable events that you can not hide from.

It would not matter how many copy and pastes you found because none of those would be for any other reason than helping people or helping the community.  

The one you present is weak as your minds. The link to the fucking bullshit you present is contained at the bottom of the post you dumb fucks.

Click the links one by one and you will be presented with fact I am not the original source although the person who helped me investigate dash deeply was from anon coin and he supported deeply my rampage against the scamming captive instamine of dash.

I will now crush you all in meta for this you scumbags.

You are of negative net worth here on the basis of pushing your own agendas and trying to suppress and bully people that do not fit in with them.

I am laughing at you because you are a bunch of mediocre shit posters that have created your own reality here where statements like

"most pre merit legends are spammers"
" It is idiotic for anyone to believe that some of the 99.87% of this board are capable of making posts as good or better than some of the 0.13% of this board "

and fabricate lies and excuses like time travel for your abuse.

The next thread coming is of your own doing. You have 12 hours to login to your puppet account retract that report and beg me to forgive you all else I will insist Theymos himself investigates the facts of the thread I present and boot you jackals out of here for good.
Highest merited posters. You range from illogical to pathological.

If you thought my last post was good this bring even more credibility to my claims you are spineless scum that needs to be rooted out before this tumor grows.

I can't wait to see how this goes down...either it is demonstrated corrupt scum en mass can take control and force through their own jackal agenda and I go out for something so weak and pathetic that I am not even sure can be enforced if you do manage to bully those you surround

Or i get to watch you all fry  for this ....

I can not lose.

I have never encountered a dumber bunch of fools .... I have broken you in public time and time again... all of you. You have denied to answer me,  tried to pretend to put me on ignore, run and hide only to come  back with more deranged mania, such moon is beaten down each day by me with facts until he can not even function and spouts total madness, the rest are even more pathetic.

Just show me one page where you ever defeat anything I;ve said ... ever. I challenge you now bring the page.  I mean a full argument ...show me just one example of you being able to bullshit past the observable evidence I have brought here,

Bring it now ...... You will not.

Scour my post history look at the people I have argued with on here compared to you jackal grovelling cowardly puppet creating scum... and still I have not lost and argument. The truth can not be defeated by anything if you have already the observable evidence to provide proof or corroborating events.

Suchmoon you are done here I swear.

Also when you read this theymos and hillarios - I have evidence that suchmoon was taunting me about copy and paste by taking my words and putting them on his avatar with no attribution to myself and still there are some there now which i have screen shot.

He should be terminated at once just on that along with all this other shit he is embroiled with and for the accusations of " most pre merit legends are spammers " how many chances does this skank get?



Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 21, 2018, 11:38:26 PM
... aaaaand she's returned to form.

You could use that argument to quite reasonably stretch to  I am the person who started the movement that prevented bitcoin in its history being removed from the top position - many people have said if this had never blown up and the entire community had not been split over the dash captive instamine scam - which lauda and pharmacist can be demonstrated to have supported  then dash would have got beyond position 2.

On behalf of all Bitcoin bagholders I sincerely thank you for saving it. I never knew it was under such a huge threat.

The one you present is weak as your minds. The link to the fucking bullshit you present is contained at the bottom of the post you dumb fucks.

Click the links one by one and you will be presented with fact I am not the original source

I will now crush you all in meta for this you scumbags.

The next thread coming is of your own doing. You have 12 hours to login to your puppet account retract that report and beg me to forgive you all else I will insist Theymos himself investigates the facts of the thread I present and boot you jackals out of here for good.

Ok so if you're not guilty as alleged why do you need the report to be removed?


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on December 21, 2018, 11:49:48 PM
You all just made a very big mistake.
<snip>
Get ready to be fried alive jackals. Come to meta when you are ready.
<snip>
you are a gang of jackals that has been waiting for a Lion to destroy and reduce you to the snivelling little dregs of this board you are.
<snip>
I have crushed you in public like ants.
<snip>
Bring me one just one instance where you have defeated me since I have found out about this bunch of bullies you are and started to highlight how gross this entire situation is turning.
<snip>
I will now crush you all in meta for this you scumbags.

You are of negative net worth here on the basis of pushing your own agendas and trying to suppress and bully people that do not fit in with them.
First thing that comes to mind is a quote from one of the characters (Francis Dolarhyde) in the novel Red Dragon (pp. 168) by Thomas Harris right before he bites the lips off a reporter and sets him on fire and then sends him strapped to a wheelchair down a hill (great novel, BTW):

    "You said that I, who see more than you, am insane.  I, who pushed the world so much further than you, am insane.  I have dared more than you.  I have pressed my unique seal so much deeper in the earth, where it will last longer than your dust.  Your life to mine is a slug track on stone.  A thin silver mucus track in and out of the letters on my monument.  I am the Dragon and you call me insane?  My movements are followed and recorded as avidly as those of a mighty guest star.  Do you know about the guest star in 1054?  Of course not.  Your readers follow you like a child follows a slug track with his finger, and in the same tired loops of reason.  Back to your shallow skull and potato face as a slug follows his own slime back home.
    "Before Me you are a slug in the sun.  You are privy to a great Becoming and you recognize nothing.  You are an ant in the afterbirth.
    "It is in your nature to do one thing correctly:  before Me you rightly tremble.  Fear is not what you owe Me, Lounds, you and the other pismires.  You owe Me awe."
_______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________

This is all barking and no biting by cryptohunter, just braggadocio and bluster.  I'll see you in Meta for whatever show you're going to put on.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 21, 2018, 11:54:40 PM
You all just made a very big mistake.
<snip>
Get ready to be fried alive jackals. Come to meta when you are ready.
<snip>
you are a gang of jackals that has been waiting for a Lion to destroy and reduce you to the snivelling little dregs of this board you are.
<snip>
I have crushed you in public like ants.
<snip>
Bring me one just one instance where you have defeated me since I have found out about this bunch of bullies you are and started to highlight how gross this entire situation is turning.
<snip>
I will now crush you all in meta for this you scumbags.

You are of negative net worth here on the basis of pushing your own agendas and trying to suppress and bully people that do not fit in with them.
First thing that comes to mind is a quote from one of the characters (Francis Dolarhyde) in the novel Red Dragon (pp. 168) by Thomas Harris right before he bites the lips off a reporter and sets him on fire and then sends him strapped to a wheelchair down a hill (great novel, BTW):

    "You said that I, who see more than you, am insane.  I, who pushed the world so much further than you, am insane.  I have dared more than you.  I have pressed my unique seal so much deeper in the earth, where it will last longer than your dust.  Your life to mine is a slug track on stone.  A thin silver mucus track in and out of the letters on my monument.  I am the Dragon and you call me insane?  My movements are followed and recorded as avidly as those of a mighty guest star.  Do you know about the guest star in 1054?  Of course not.  Your readers follow you like a child follows a slug track with his finger, and in the same tired loops of reason.  Back to your shallow skull and potato face as a slug follows his own slime back home.
    "Before Me you are a slug in the sun.  You are privy to a great Becoming and you recognize nothing.  You are an ant in the afterbirth.
    "It is in your nature to do one thing correctly:  before Me you rightly tremble.  Fear is not what you owe Me, Lounds, you and the other pismires.  You owe Me awe."
_______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________

This is all barking and no biting by cryptohunter, just braggadocio and bluster.  I'll see you in Meta for whatever show you're going to put on.


Your personal thread is coming moron. I have never ever debated with such a weak mind. It will be fun watching you unravel in public based on REAL OBSERVABLE EVENTS - .

Also while you're here please refute anything I have said here about my accomplishments then please list all of yours.

I will bring that to the thread also dash supporting scum. Bullying noobs around and trying to sound smart.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 21, 2018, 11:56:43 PM
... aaaaand she's returned to form.

You could use that argument to quite reasonably stretch to  I am the person who started the movement that prevented bitcoin in its history being removed from the top position - many people have said if this had never blown up and the entire community had not been split over the dash captive instamine scam - which lauda and pharmacist can be demonstrated to have supported  then dash would have got beyond position 2.

On behalf of all Bitcoin bagholders I sincerely thank you for saving it. I never knew it was under such a huge threat.

The one you present is weak as your minds. The link to the fucking bullshit you present is contained at the bottom of the post you dumb fucks.

Click the links one by one and you will be presented with fact I am not the original source

I will now crush you all in meta for this you scumbags.

The next thread coming is of your own doing. You have 12 hours to login to your puppet account retract that report and beg me to forgive you all else I will insist Theymos himself investigates the facts of the thread I present and boot you jackals out of here for good.

Ok so if you're not guilty as alleged why do you need the report to be removed?

I have proven it is groundless you dumb asshole. However I will not have my name on a scam thread when it is incorrect.
Now login and remove it.

YOur logic is again broken since you say hillarious has seen it. Now log in and get it done.

Yeah dash never reached number 2 spot ....you know nothing because you hide in here grassing people up. Not for much longer you're done.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 22, 2018, 12:00:59 AM
I have proven it is groundless you dumb asshole. However I will not have my name on a scam thread when it is incorrect.
Now login and remove it.

YOur logic is again broken since you say hillarious has seen it. Now log in and get it done.

Yeah dash never reached number 2 spot ....you know nothing because you hide in here grassing people up. Not for much longer you're done.

I don't think you've proven anything. The point is you've argued long enough for a transparent public leniency process for plagiarizers but now you're trying to sweep it under the rug. Why is that?

If you're implying I posted that report - you're dumber than I thought, and that's saying a lot. I have no reason to do anything under an alt, let alone something I do 100s of times a day.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 22, 2018, 12:30:29 AM
I have proven it is groundless you dumb asshole. However I will not have my name on a scam thread when it is incorrect.
Now login and remove it.

YOur logic is again broken since you say hillarious has seen it. Now log in and get it done.

Yeah dash never reached number 2 spot ....you know nothing because you hide in here grassing people up. Not for much longer you're done.

I don't think you've proven anything. The point is you've argued long enough for a transparent public leniency process for plagiarizers but now you're trying to sweep it under the rug. Why is that?

If you're implying I posted that report - you're dumber than I thought, and that's saying a lot. I have no reason to do anything under an alt, let alone something I do 100s of times a day.


Sweep what ???did you read my post you fool.

The link to the information I used on all of those posts is there contained in the posts..... how am I claiming it as my own if the link to the information i am posting is contained in the post ...they are the references

Even if they were not you think the person who discovered dash scam and had 100's of people helping him prove it was a captive instamine scam will get banned for quoting a person  that supported me more than nearly any other . Fuck off you dillusional fool.

YOU HAD EVERY REASON TO USE A PUPPET ACCOUNT MORON BECAUSE YOU ARE PART OF THE GANG TRYING TO SILENCE ME AND PUSH RED TRUST ON ME 2 DAYS AGO YOU COWARDLY SCUM... SO NOW IT WOULD LOOK BAD IF PART OF THE SAME GANG TRIED TO GET ME BANNED FOR BRINGING LIGHT ON THE FACT YOU ARE ALL PART OF A GANG COLLUDING TO SHUT PEOPLE UP

I AM FULLY ON TO YOU NOW AND I WILL PRESENT REASONABLE CREDIBLE AND CORROBORATING EVIDENCE FOR THIS AND YES IT DOES LOOK BAD FOR YOU.  EVEN HOW "YOU" HAPPENED TO BE THE ONE TO BE STRAIGHT THERE AFTER IT POPPED ON MY THREAD.

Where is your list of accomplishments again? fucking whack a mole grassing bullying little imbecile.

Nothing would be any different here if you had never joined nor the rest of this colluding gang of merit hoarding shit stains. None of you have done anything of real consequence ever.

I mean any one of you bring 1 fucking thing you have done here that made a big difference and show me how things would have been any different if you had never joined. I challenge you to do it NOW.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on December 22, 2018, 12:44:43 AM
Your personal thread is coming moron.
I can't wait!  Can you give me an estimate on how long it's going to be before you create that thread?  I gots ants in my pants, so don't take your sweet ass time, k?  I'm just itching to see what you think I've done wrong and want to hear how bad the community thinks I am, too.  Maybe I'll get banned!!

By the way, you keep issuing challenges here, but if you expect people to bend to your will and your requests and your ranting lunacy, you're going to be sorely disappointed--but I'm sure you'll use it as more proof of your superiority and of the conspiracy.  So just sayin'. 

And FYI, last I checked the only person who's left you a neg recently is Lauda, so your rant about all of this red trust you're being given doesn't make a lick of sense.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 22, 2018, 12:49:19 AM
Sweep what ???did you read my post you fool.

The link to the information I used on all of those posts is there contained in the posts..... how am I claiming it as my own if the link to the information i am posting is contained in the post ...they are the references

There is zero indication that the contents of your post is not authored by you. The links don't even point to specific posts where you copied the info from.

I'm not saying you must be banned for this. Moderators can choose to show you some leniency and that's fine. But let's not pretend that you quoted and attributed the texts properly. You didn't.

Even if they were not you think the person who discovered dash scam and had 100's of people helping him prove it was a captive instamine scam will get banned for quoting a person  that supported me more than nearly any other . Fuck off you dillusional fool.

YOU HAD EVERY REASON TO USE A PUPPET ACCOUNT MORON BECAUSE YOU ARE PART OF THE GANG TRYING TO SILENCE ME AND PUSH RED TRUST ON ME 2 DAYS AGO YOU COWARDLY SCUM... SO NOW IT WOULD LOOK BAD IF PART OF THE SAME GANG TRIED TO GET ME BANNED FOR BRINGING LIGHT ON THE FACT YOU ARE ALL PART OF A GANG COLLUDING TO SHUT PEOPLE UP

I AM FULLY ON TO YOU NOW AND I WILL PRESENT REASONABLE CREDIBLE AND CORROBORATING EVIDENCE FOR THIS AND YES IT DOES LOOK BAD FOR YOU.  EVEN HOW "YOU" HAPPENED TO BE THE ONE TO BE STRAIGHT THERE AFTER IT POPPED ON MY THREAD.

I'm firing up my Redenbacher. Don't make me wait.

Where is your list of accomplishments again? fucking whack a mole grassing bullying little imbecile.

Nothing would be any different here if you had never joined nor the rest of this colluding gang of merit hoarding shit stains. None of you have done anything of real consequence ever.

I mean any one of you bring 1 fucking thing you have done here that made a big difference and show me how things would have been any different if you had never joined. I challenge you to do it NOW.

Not everyone is as narcissistic as you.

I can't wait!  Can you give me an estimate on how long it's going to be before you create that thread?

Have you learned nothing? cryptohunter won't do shit (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5084723.msg48685327#msg48685327), LoyceV will have to do the heavy lifting.  ;D


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 22, 2018, 12:50:53 AM
Your personal thread is coming moron.
I can't wait!  Can you give me an estimate on how long it's going to be before you create that thread?  I gots ants in my pants, so don't take your sweet ass time, k?  I'm just itching to see what you think I've done wrong and want to hear how bad the community thinks I am, too.  Maybe I'll get banned!!

By the way, you keep issuing challenges here, but if you expect people to bend to your will and your requests and your ranting lunacy, you're going to be sorely disappointed--but I'm sure you'll use it as more proof of your superiority and of the conspiracy.  So just sayin'. 

And FYI, last I checked the only person who's left you a neg recently is Lauda, so your rant about all of this red trust you're being given doesn't make a lick of sense.

You know full well i was given red trust and got it removed.

I ask again bring any accomplishments of yours proving you have been net positive here. Why would things be any different if you had never joined.

None of you answer because you know nothing would be different here. That is why you do not answer.

FUCK LAUDAM that piece of shit was one of the main dash scam protectors and enablers. He apparently also moved escrow funds of investors and used them to take 3000 bch and this is a project that went to shit and the investors got fucked. That is what I have heard about LAUDAM - neg trust from him is an endorsement fool.

Stop saying you are not scared i smell your fear already.

ALL these merits and not one fucking accomplishment here you can post for me to prove that anything would be any different without you??? JOKE.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on December 22, 2018, 12:57:53 AM
I ask again bring any accomplishments of yours proving you have been net positive here.
OK, I got put on DT2 and then was made a merit source.  

I'm one of the most generous merit-givers here and try to act like a manure spreader, letting the merits fly all over the place, hitting as many different users as possible.  

I got accepted into one of the most competitive signature campaigns on the forum, for which I'm grateful.

I've tagged a lot of account dealers who later turned out to be complete scammers (you can go through the feedbacks I've left yourself).

I've reported about 4000 posts, 99% of which were good.

Oh yeah, marlboroza left you a neg and then removed it, right?  I apologize; I honestly forgot about that.  You might think you're the center of my universe, but it's actually easy for me to forget insignificant idiots and the feedbacks they've received.

Edit:  Just to let everyone else know, none of the above is stuff I'd brag about, but cryptoscunter asked for some accomplishments and seemed like he'd keep asking me until I provided some evidence....of whatever.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 22, 2018, 01:02:16 AM
Sweep what ???did you read my post you fool.

The link to the information I used on all of those posts is there contained in the posts..... how am I claiming it as my own if the link to the information i am posting is contained in the post ...they are the references

There is zero indication that the contents of your post is not authored by you. The links don't even point to specific posts where you copied the info from.

I'm not saying you must be banned for this. Moderators can choose to show you some leniency and that's fine. But let's not pretend that you quoted and attributed the texts properly. You didn't.

Even if they were not you think the person who discovered dash scam and had 100's of people helping him prove it was a captive instamine scam will get banned for quoting a person  that supported me more than nearly any other . Fuck off you dillusional fool.

YOU HAD EVERY REASON TO USE A PUPPET ACCOUNT MORON BECAUSE YOU ARE PART OF THE GANG TRYING TO SILENCE ME AND PUSH RED TRUST ON ME 2 DAYS AGO YOU COWARDLY SCUM... SO NOW IT WOULD LOOK BAD IF PART OF THE SAME GANG TRIED TO GET ME BANNED FOR BRINGING LIGHT ON THE FACT YOU ARE ALL PART OF A GANG COLLUDING TO SHUT PEOPLE UP

I AM FULLY ON TO YOU NOW AND I WILL PRESENT REASONABLE CREDIBLE AND CORROBORATING EVIDENCE FOR THIS AND YES IT DOES LOOK BAD FOR YOU.  EVEN HOW "YOU" HAPPENED TO BE THE ONE TO BE STRAIGHT THERE AFTER IT POPPED ON MY THREAD.

I'm firing up my Redenbacher. Don't make me wait.

Where is your list of accomplishments again? fucking whack a mole grassing bullying little imbecile.

Nothing would be any different here if you had never joined nor the rest of this colluding gang of merit hoarding shit stains. None of you have done anything of real consequence ever.

I mean any one of you bring 1 fucking thing you have done here that made a big difference and show me how things would have been any different if you had never joined. I challenge you to do it NOW.

Not everyone is as narcissistic as you.

Yeah cos every fucking person trying to pass work as his own puts a link in that post that if you click it you come to the place I got it. NOW get lost  you coward scum bag even trying to back peddle. I mean look at the red trust thread.. even that fucking scum did not appologise to me for fucking presenting a full lie there to try and make me look worse. He fucked his time line up and lied. Not even said sorry about it where as you fucking cowards give me red trust by using these scare quotes near real quotes marks with my real quotes in. I get red trust for this and you fuckers lie about me and make puppet accounts to try and get me banned. I am going to fucking crush you when I have finished compiling my thread about you all. I want every one of you taken off DT and even better temp banned.. I am not sure wether to push for full ban because that makes me look as bad you cowards like I am scared to face you even though I love it.

I will consider what I state i think should be done about such devious, cowardly  untrustworthy jackals.

Do not reply to me again unless it is about your accomplishments here

I don't give one fuck about your opinion - do you get that coward jackal scumbag sock puppet creating grassing shit stain imbecile.

I am not even narcissistic that is but ONE of the accomplishments I have made here . I have pms from so many people thanking me for changing their lives by telling them freely which of the projects here are worthy of time and effort to investigate. I have made several people multi millionaires from having nothing. I have threads with people confirming I have helped them gain fortunes. I gave that information freely. From the 10 I predicted 6  were the in the TOP 10 biggest gainers.

That is another tiny thing I have done for people here. You think DASH is my only one.

If there were 1000 suchmoons here you would not have made the difference i have and never once have I made these very reasonable comments about myself until you scumbags go and pick one of my very best to try and get me banned you dumb ass fools.




Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 22, 2018, 01:11:50 AM
Yeah cos every fucking person trying to pass work as his own puts a link in that post that if you click it you come to the place I got it. NOW get lost  you coward scum bag even trying to back peddle. I mean look at the red trust thread.. even that fucking scum did not appologise to me for fucking presenting a full lie there to try and make me look worse. He fucked his time line up and lied. Not even said sorry about it where as you fucking cowards give me red trust by using these scare quotes near real quotes marks with my real quotes in. I get red trust for this and you fuckers lie about me and make puppet accounts to try and get me banned. I am going to fucking crush you when I have finished compiling my thread about you all. I want every one of you taken off DT and even better temp banned.. I am not sure wether to push for full ban because that makes me look as bad you cowards like I am scared to face you even though I love it.

Here is how it's really going to play out. You will keep lying. You will end up like many other liars before you.

I will consider what I state i think should be done about such devious, cowardly  untrustworthy jackals.

Do not reply to me again unless it is about your accomplishments here

You're setting rules in my thread now? ;D

I don't give one fuck about your opinion - do you get that coward jackal scumbag sock puppet creating grassing shit stain imbecile.

I am not even narcissistic that is but ONE of the accomplishments I have made here . I have pms from so many people thanking me for changing their lives by telling them freely which of the projects here are worthy of time and effort to investigate. I have made several people multi millionaires from having nothing. I have threads with people confirming I have helped them gain fortunes. I gave that information freely. From the 10 I predicted 6  were the in the TOP 10 biggest gainers.

That is another tiny thing I have done for people here. You think DASH is my only one.

If there were 1000 suchmoons here you would not have made the difference i have and never once have I made these very reasonable comments about myself until you scumbags go and pick one of my very best to try and get me banned you dumb ass fools.

Oh no, what was I thinking. You're certainly not a narcissist. You're just having very reasonable delusions of grandeur.



Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 22, 2018, 01:17:55 AM
I ask again bring any accomplishments of yours proving you have been net positive here.
OK, I got put on DT2 and then was made a merit source.  

I'm one of the most generous merit-givers here and try to act like a manure spreader, letting the merits fly all over the place, hitting as many different users as possible.  

I got accepted into one of the most competitive signature campaigns on the forum, for which I'm grateful.

I've tagged a lot of account dealers who later turned out to be complete scammers (you can go through the feedbacks I've left yourself).

I've reported about 4000 posts, 99% of which were good.

Oh yeah, marlboroza left you a neg and then removed it, right?  I apologize; I honestly forgot about that.  You might think you're the center of my universe, but it's actually easy for me to forget insignificant idiots and the feedbacks they've received.

Edit:  Just to let everyone else know, none of the above is stuff I'd brag about, but cryptoscunter asked for some accomplishments and seemed like he'd keep asking me until I provided some evidence....of whatever.

So nothing then that would matter and nothing would be hugely different if you had not been here.




correct thanks for that.

Whack a mole and earning yourself good bucks from sigs -

brag??

You I have tried to go easy on mostly due to the fact I feel you should not be treated as a serious character ...however you are not at all prepared for the factual account I can bring just demonstrating how foolish you are during a debate and the total and utter lack of clarity of thought.

You have not yet that I know tried to fuck me over as bad as some. More hiding and sniping and meriting their observable trash and word salad ... even seeming a bit shocked at foxy time travel merits. Stay the fuck out of my way unless you have a valid opinion of your own and a full case to substantiate it and not just say you will not answer me and run off. Then saying shit about me in other threads.
Stay out of my way and perhaps I will not crush you in public.

When I say I will crush people or destroy them I mean with facts demonstrating exactly why such people should not be in positions of trust or power. I have that evidence whether you chose to believe me or not until it is presented is your problem.

Find one case on this entire board where I have been wrong ANYWHERE about something I was serious about. Not just joking around stuff.

I do not lose arguments because first I find the truth then I make sure I have a very powerful case to demonstrate it.

However smart you are I am not going to be drawn away from the facts I have that demonstrate what I know to be true.

When you have tackled HUGE scams with 100's of supporting scum bags against you and you alone and won every single argument and gained massive support against projects until they can not be mentioned without people saying scam and repeating my arguments.

GO research you are bunch of jackals and non achievers daring to insult me with bans and red trust.

I never even heard of suchmoon or any of these fucking jumped up little turds before ....where have you been hiding whilst me and others like me have been pushing back huge scams and helping genuine projects grow here.  Yeah hiding in merit building some back slappers club where you think you can do what the fuck you like including abusing the system to get me banned and give me red trust.

@such moon coward puppet shit stain


Oh so no accomplishments apart from whack a mole.? nothing at all come on???

Show me the LIE NOW

PROVE anything I have said about my past accomplishments are false NOW or stfu.

I am preparing my thread to bring all of this gang of jackals down. The thread will only consist of observable material that everyone on this board not just meta will get to view. Fuck meta echo chamber time to bring to the entire board how this bunch of jackals are sucking the life out of this board.

Be ready to answer my questions in public or else the avoidance will be telling. See you soon coward sock puppets creating scum.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 22, 2018, 01:30:05 AM
Whack a mole and earning yourself good bucks from sigs -

brag??

You I have tried to go easy on mostly due to the fact I feel you should not be treated as a serious character ...however you are not at all prepared for the factual account I can bring just demonstrating how foolish you are during a debate and the total and utter lack of clarity of thought.

You have not yet that I know tried to fuck me over as bad as some. More hiding and sniping and meriting their observable trash and word salad ... even seeming a bit shocked at foxy time travel merits. Stay the fuck out of my way unless you have a valid opinion of your own and a full case to substantiate it and not just say you will not answer me and run off. Then saying shit about me in other threads.
Stay out of my way and perhaps I will not crush you in public.

When I say I will crush people or destroy them I mean with facts demonstrating exactly why such people should not be in positions of trust or power. I have that evidence whether you chose to believe me or not until it is presented is your problem.

Find one case on this entire board where I have been wrong ANYWHERE about something I was serious about. Not just joking around stuff.

I do not lose arguments because first I find the truth then I make sure I have a very powerful case to demonstrate it.

However smart you are I am not going to be drawn away from the facts I have that demonstrate what I know to be true.

When you have tackled HUGE scams with 100's of supporting scum bags against you and you alone and won every single argument and gained massive support against projects until they can not be mentioned without people saying scam and repeating my arguments.

GO research you are bunch of jackals and non achievers daring to insult me with bans and red trust.

I never even heard of suchmoon or any of these fucking jumped up little turds before ....where have you been hiding whilst me and others like me have been pushing back huge scams and helping genuine projects grow here.  Yeah hiding in merit building some back slappers club where you think you can do what the fuck you like including abusing the system to get me banned and give me red trust.

@such moon coward puppet shit stain

Slow down, I don't have enough space under my avatar to fit all this.

Oh so no accomplishments apart from whack a mole.? nothing at all come on???

Show me the LIE NOW

PROVE anything I have said about my past accomplishments are false NOW or stfu.

The most recent lie is about you having proof that I posted that plagiarism report. Here how it works: I know you're lying because I know for a fact I didn't post it so you can't possibly have proof. You know you're lying because you know you don't have proof. It's really quite simple, isn't it? This is where you will weasel out of posting that elusive proof.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: Chosen Username on December 22, 2018, 01:34:42 AM
m post wus delete so is fixes it 2 b smaller

You dumb asses don't even realise that all of those posts have a link to the original quote at the bottom.

lmfao btfo

last I checked the only person who's left you a neg recently is Lauda

malboroza

It would not matter how many copy and pastes you found because none of those would be for any other reason than helping people or helping the community.  

#truth

copy/pase other than scamming a sig camp by spamming is of no concern




Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 22, 2018, 01:41:53 AM
Whack a mole and earning yourself good bucks from sigs -

brag??

You I have tried to go easy on mostly due to the fact I feel you should not be treated as a serious character ...however you are not at all prepared for the factual account I can bring just demonstrating how foolish you are during a debate and the total and utter lack of clarity of thought.

You have not yet that I know tried to fuck me over as bad as some. More hiding and sniping and meriting their observable trash and word salad ... even seeming a bit shocked at foxy time travel merits. Stay the fuck out of my way unless you have a valid opinion of your own and a full case to substantiate it and not just say you will not answer me and run off. Then saying shit about me in other threads.
Stay out of my way and perhaps I will not crush you in public.

When I say I will crush people or destroy them I mean with facts demonstrating exactly why such people should not be in positions of trust or power. I have that evidence whether you chose to believe me or not until it is presented is your problem.

Find one case on this entire board where I have been wrong ANYWHERE about something I was serious about. Not just joking around stuff.

I do not lose arguments because first I find the truth then I make sure I have a very powerful case to demonstrate it.

However smart you are I am not going to be drawn away from the facts I have that demonstrate what I know to be true.

When you have tackled HUGE scams with 100's of supporting scum bags against you and you alone and won every single argument and gained massive support against projects until they can not be mentioned without people saying scam and repeating my arguments.

GO research you are bunch of jackals and non achievers daring to insult me with bans and red trust.

I never even heard of suchmoon or any of these fucking jumped up little turds before ....where have you been hiding whilst me and others like me have been pushing back huge scams and helping genuine projects grow here.  Yeah hiding in merit building some back slappers club where you think you can do what the fuck you like including abusing the system to get me banned and give me red trust.

@such moon coward puppet shit stain

Slow down, I don't have enough space under my avatar to fit all this.

Oh so no accomplishments apart from whack a mole.? nothing at all come on???

Show me the LIE NOW

PROVE anything I have said about my past accomplishments are false NOW or stfu.

The most recent lie is about you having proof that I posted that plagiarism report. Here how it works: I know you're lying because I know for a fact I didn't post it so you can't have proof. You know you're lying because you know you don't have proof. It's really quite simple, isn't it?

LOL fuck off dick .... I will address this shit later and post where I said i have proof

I have corroborating events to suggest you are the one with the most motive to have done it and first to comment on it in my thread and all over it here ....and a cowardly jackal too....

You pull this shit on me then think  " you lied boo hoo" you think that will pull me off you now dumb ass.

So still not accomplishments at all... that sums you up. Didn't think so because i never heard of you before and i have even heard of TP before and that is remarkable in its own right since he has not done anything of note either.

A gang of "done nothings" bullying people around ....LOL

You think the avatar is a non issue? You are wrong it is far more of an issue than the shit you are trying on me you snake.
Also you have no net worth in my books you help play wack a mole whilst nothing changes and you are negative to most people in threads and try to talk down to them ( i mean you are a imbecile as I have proven by breaking you to pieces in every argument until your skull collapses like a rotten pumpkin and you spew out pure ludicrous nonsense ....

"MOST PRE MERIT LEGENDS ARE SPAMMERS" - suchmoon  - do you stick to that LIE prove it or you are lying boo hooo you told a lie I will cry to red trust, i will cry to some mods and hope i can get your told off. YOUR LIE IS PROVABLE OBSERVABLE LIE.  My allegation is beyond proof on either side so your lie is worse plus I have corroborating evidence you lie has none and the evidence will contradict your lie got it now have you coward. Now fuck off you creepy freak.

You are a devious little snake and I don't trust you one bit. Time to demonstrate this to the rest of the board and not just meta.



Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on December 22, 2018, 01:44:02 AM
So nothing then that would matter and nothing would be hugely different if you had not been here.

<snip>
I have that evidence whether you chose to believe me or not until it is presented is your problem.
Here's some truth:  I realize that the forum would be just fine without me, and the world will keep spinning and functioning just fine if I dropped dead tomorrow.  I don't see myself as some powerful figure on bitcointalk, because I'm not.  I've made errors in judgement and on occasion have had to reverse trust I've left and/or apologize for being out of line.  I'm just one member out of millions on this board. 

You don't seem to grasp that much of what I wrote about importance to the forum is true of yourself, however, and I base that statement on everything you've written about yourself and about other members in the past week or so.  You're demonstrating some sort of persecution complex mixed with an ego trip, and you're nowhere near as important or significant as you think.

Bring all the evidence you have against me for the vague offenses you claimed I've committed.  You all but promised to do so, so I'll be waiting in Meta.

BTW, how the hell did I get sucked back into this shit?





Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 22, 2018, 02:01:25 AM
m post wus delete so is fixes it 2 b smaller

You dumb asses don't even realise that all of those posts have a link to the original quote at the bottom.

lmfao btfo

last I checked the only person who's left you a neg recently is Lauda

malboroza

It would not matter how many copy and pastes you found because none of those would be for any other reason than helping people or helping the community.  

#truth

copy/pase other than scamming a sig camp by spamming is of no concern




thanks for support... and the link to the text they are crying about is there with all the other information in the same post.


@thepharmacist

fuck off you duplicitous scum bag, I am done playing your game ..you appear all nice and reasonable and then snipe away and add support to this gang through merits, sniping comments at me (then never back them up) then sneak to other threads and start sniping away at me whilst you think I don't notice. YOu are not a nice humble person like you are playing here for sympathy fake nice guy act.

You are a tyranical fucking big headed high horseman to those you think you can pick on and you are a duplicitous shit stain being nice to people to their face pretending to be all measure and nice then describing them later as pieces of shit in burning paper or whatever ...

You do not reverse your decision even when proven wrong when i have been there.

Now I mean it don't even think about spinning me into be a persecution complex because only an imbecile who does not follow your posts would believe you.

LOL  - really well tell me in detail about how what I have done is insignificant please.... I will wait for the book after you have read up on every scam I have outed and every scammer I have crushed in public with facts proving how disgusting they are.. .and all the people I have made fortunes for free just to help the real good projects shine. Then when you are done detailing all of those come back and I give you more to describe how insignificant they are compared to your making money for yourself out of sigs and reporting people who just spring back on here straight away....infinite whack a mole fucking master here making bucks whilst getting all high and mighty. Your posts are garbage I have read them You do not have the mind to construct anything useful you are a fool don't you see why I have gone easier on you that the others. PITTY you live at home all day and never go out anywhere so i feel sorry for you and even though you snipe at me and even though you always support the gang and talk shit about me you wont substantiate after weeeks you dumb shits have had to find something on me.

There is nothing you dumb fucks because I'm not just out for myself like you lot and I do things for others for real. i help others with no gain to myself like the guy you were bullying demanding a ban when he had done nothing wrong.

You can not stand up to scrutiny because you are pretending to be what you are not. You are not nice and humble and grateful you are a nasty tyrannical asshole when you think you can be. Now get back to lauda because I know that fucking scum bag sent you here.

Stay away from me and sniping at me or else I will crush you in public with your post history. Got that. That's not a threat right because your post history shows a nice guy, fair guy, logical guy so you will enjoy reading what you are really like. You are cruel and lack empathy to people you think you can push around take a look in the mirror and change whilst you can because soon you will become suchmoon and there is no going back from being like that.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 22, 2018, 02:24:09 AM
LOL fuck off dick .... I will address this shit later and post where I said i have proof

I have corroborating events to suggest you are the one with the most motive to have done it and first to comment on it in my thread and all over it here ....and a cowardly jackal too....

You pull this shit on me then think  " you lied boo hoo" you think that will pull me off you now dumb ass.

Well, you said it here:

YOU HAD EVERY REASON TO USE A PUPPET ACCOUNT MORON BECAUSE YOU ARE PART OF THE GANG TRYING TO SILENCE ME AND PUSH RED TRUST ON ME 2 DAYS AGO YOU COWARDLY SCUM... SO NOW IT WOULD LOOK BAD IF PART OF THE SAME GANG TRIED TO GET ME BANNED FOR BRINGING LIGHT ON THE FACT YOU ARE ALL PART OF A GANG COLLUDING TO SHUT PEOPLE UP

I AM FULLY ON TO YOU NOW AND I WILL PRESENT REASONABLE CREDIBLE AND CORROBORATING EVIDENCE FOR THIS AND YES IT DOES LOOK BAD FOR YOU.  EVEN HOW "YOU" HAPPENED TO BE THE ONE TO BE STRAIGHT THERE AFTER IT POPPED ON MY THREAD.

So what is "THIS" that you have evidence for? If it's not all those things that you're alleging (puppet account, trying to get you banned, etc) then you seem to be lying. And why do you need to wait for something? Just post it already.

So still not accomplishments at all... that sums you up. Didn't think so because i never heard of you before and i have even heard of TP before and that is remarkable in its own right since he has not done anything of note either.

A gang of "done nothings" bullying people around ....LOL

You think the avatar is a non issue? You are wrong it is far more of an issue than the shit you are trying on me you snake.
Also you have no net worth in my books you help play wack a mole whilst nothing changes and you are negative to most people in threads and try to talk down to them ( i mean you are a imbecile as I have proven by breaking you to pieces in every argument until your skull collapses like a rotten pumpkin and you spew out pure ludicrous nonsense ....

"MOST PRE MERIT LEGENDS ARE SPAMMERS" - suchmoon  - do you stick to that LIE prove it or you are lying

You still hung up on that? ;D

Median Legendary merit score is 1001. Let me know if you need help deciphering what that means.

boo hooo you told a lie I will cry to red trust, i will cry to some mods and hope i can get your told off. YOUR  LIE IS PROVABLE OBSERVABLE LIE.  My allegation is beyond proof on either side so your lie is worse plus I have corroborating evidence you lie has none and the evidence will contradict your lie got it now have you coward. Now fuck off you creepy freak.

You are a devious little snake and I don't trust you one bit. Time to demonstrate this to the rest of the board and not just meta.

You're already outside of Meta so you can proceed with the demonstrating like right now. Though I doubt you'll top Homero and his buddies who paid 10 BTC for my dox. Good old times. Even trolls were better back in the day.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 22, 2018, 02:39:40 AM
such moon again will like to divert to something new now the sock puppet cowardly scheme fucked up and caused the comedy team more damage by supplying me with more corroborating evidence that they are gunning for me and trying to shut me down cos they are worried people are waking up to their dirty bully tactics.

jackals always nipping then quickly trying to slip around and nip somewhere else when you face them pack of filthy skanks.

let's focus on you

"most pre merit legends are spammers" is the filthy disrespectful lie to the eldest and first of this forum some noob trash like you thinks you can claim   - so your proof is merit score =1001 - LOL stfu some are probably are not even posting.. or now and then at most

so tell me again right now the answer .... do you keep to your lie " most pre merit legends are spammers"  YES OR NO

how can you think that most of the eldest legends of this board are spammers you imbecile.

stfu i have no care to indulge you in anything you have no real power yet you are not a mod you are a coward...

who gives a fuck about your cycled merits. I have demonstrated you have a lot of merits but can not list one accomplishment here you moronic fool. That means shit. There are legends here that have gained not even a tenth of your cycled merits who could destroy your entire feeble mind in one debate. Go debate with DZ, or smooth or any other of the legends with hardly any merit.

You can't comprehend that your merit score does not mean that you are anything other than a shitposter who has accomplished nothing of note.....it's simple if your posts were great then where are your great acheivements??

You are a provable liar where I am making sensible and reasonable assumptions you can not prove are incorrect can you imbecile. Also to punish anything you have to have power and you have nothing but a gang that I will crush into disbanding or wearing down to a broken shell of what they were. It is easy for me because this time this gang are mediocre to low level functioning before they have enlisted some of a better standard. In your case this latest attempted scheme has backfired and given me much more ammunition. You can deny it but it is not going to work. One of you scum bags did this and it is pointing at you. If not I will blacken the entire group until one tells me who it was and I will let them out of it. Come forward now and I will not come after you specifically with this and you may retain some form of credbility here as trustworthy. You have 1 day to contact me and tell me who reported that shit under a puppet account.

Stop replying to me unless  you bring some achievements ..... why should I talk to such a low achiever anway?? what kudos will I have to say in the future when crypto takes over. LOL......... i remember back in the early days of crypto ... I was talking to the user such moon and he well.....let's take a look back in history on the board at his claim to fame..... errr okay let's move back to talking about someone of more repute who made a difference.

I am going back to meta and to stay there I am finished with you here and in full until you prove you are worthy of my high achieving time. It is valuable not like your whack a mole - nobody would notice if you existed nonsense.

I have tried to be nice to you but now you have proven to be a disgusting cowardly scum bag. there is no more of it. You will be publicly demonstrated to be a moron and a liar not to mention a bully to the weak minded.



Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 22, 2018, 03:05:59 AM
"most pre merit legends are spammers" is the filthy disrespectful lie to the eldest and first of this forum some noob trash like you thinks you can claim   - so your proof is merit score =1001 - LOL stfu some are probably are not even posting.. or now and then at most

so tell me again right now the answer .... do you keep to your lie " most pre merit legends are spammers"  YES OR NO

I checked only the Legendaries that have been active since the introduction of the merit system. As of last week there were ~1950 of those. That's ~90% of all Legendaries BTW, if you exclude banned ones. Participation level is high, quality is abysmal. ~980 had earned one merit or none at all in ~10 months.

That's proof enough for me. But since you don't believe in merits it's not going to work for you.

how can you think that most of the eldest legends of this board are spammers you imbecile.

stfu i have no care to indulge you in anything you have no real power yet you are not a mod you are a coward...

who gives a fuck about your cycled merits. I have demonstrated you have a lot of merits but can not list one accomplishment here you moronic fool. That means shit. There are legends here that have gained not even a tenth of your cycled merits who could destroy your entire feeble mind in one debate. Go debate with DZ, or smooth or any other of the legends with hardly any merit.

You can't comprehend that your merit score does not mean that you are anything other than a shitposter who has accomplished nothing of note.....it's simple if your posts were great then where are your great acheivements??

You are a provable liar where I am making sensible and reasonable assumptions you can not prove are incorrect can you imbecile. Also to punish anything you have to have power and you have nothing but a gang that I will crush into disbanding or wearing down to a broken shell of what they were. It is easy for me because this time this gang are mediocre to low level functioning before they have enlisted some of a better standard. In your case this latest attempted scheme has backfired and given me much more ammunition. You can deny it but it is not going to work. One of you scum bags did this and it is pointing at you. If not I will blacken the entire group until one tells me who it was and I will let them out of it. Come forward now and I will not come after you specifically with this and you may retain some form of credbility here as trustworthy. You have 1 day to contact me and tell me who reported that shit under a puppet account.

Stop replying to me unless  you bring some achievements ..... why should I talk to such a low achiever anway??

Gosh darn it. I'll be heartbroken if you stop talking to me but I'll pull through.

what kudos will I have to say in the future when crypto takes over. LOL......... i remember back in the early days of crypto ... I was talking to the user such moon and he well.....let's take a look back in history on the board at his claim to fame..... errr okay let's move back to talking about someone of more repute who made a difference.

I am going back to meta and to stay there I am finished with you here and in full until you prove you are worthy of my high achieving time. It is valuable not like your whack a mole - nobody would notice if you existed nonsense.

I have tried to be nice to you but now you have proven to be a disgusting cowardly scum bag. there is no more of it. You will be publicly demonstrated to be a moron and a liar not to mention a bully to the weak minded.

Well, if that was you being nice I'm gonna need a bigger bowl for when you're not.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 22, 2018, 03:19:46 AM
So please state it again

Yes or no - most pre merit legends are spammers. A simple yes or no I don't want is enough for me...bla bla bla

You wil try and weasel out of it....now state after me. I suchmoon state that most pre merit legends are spammers. Or just say yes i believe all pre merit legends are spammers. SImple.


we will move to your other statements (lies) later.


It is though true isn't it, aside from whack a mole reporting you are nothing? achieved NOTHING of note yet seek to prove you are net positive cos you have some circled merits and other legends are worth nothing and are spammers if they have low merit??

So really cos all the moles just come back straight after ...then you are pointless right now? we can agree since you will not list any real accomplishments we can look back on the history of crypto and just not even look at what you did cos there is not net gain to demonstrate really?

I mean really to push you into net negative territory won't be that hard. Maybe I will be a big fucking coward piece of shit and start looking at yours for a tiny tiny error because it will not take much to create argument for you being net negative really.

I can't wait to tell low merit legends how most of them are spammers according to you? or is that not what you are saying I have still not had a simple yes or no??

Look it is easy YES

NO

I can do it all the time. Try it then we move to some of your other lies.

The thing is i don't give one fuck about your or your lies at all. I just want you to fuck off and stop talking to me at all. Stop coming replying to everything I say (because I can demonstrate you have hounded me and been negative 1st to me on the vast vast vast majority of times when I have never hardly ever sort you out to talk to you first.) I will still see you off dt and never a mod and hopefully take your merit source away for what you have done here with this shit you tried to pull on me today. I see may now  need to raise you to scammer really because such devious sneaky dirty tactic is quite something a scammer would do.

You are damaged goods a sad little loser who can not tell me one accomplishment but wants to tell all pre merit legends his seniors and his betters they are mostly all spammers

LOL you are funny and pointless.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: Chosen Username on December 22, 2018, 03:50:22 AM
Going to hav change thread title
""top 200 merit recievers problem with cryptohunter""

""killquotes"" - learn new thing <


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 22, 2018, 03:58:57 AM
So please state it again

Yes or no - most pre merit legends are spammers. A simple yes or no I don't want is enough for me...bla bla bla

You wil try and weasel out of it....now state after me. I suchmoon state that most pre merit legends are spammers. Or just say yes i believe all pre merit legends are spammers. SImple.

I never said otherwise so not sure what you want from me. Yes, I think most pre-merit Legendaries are spammers. Do you need that notarized?

we will move to your other statements (lies) later.

It is though true isn't it, aside from whack a mole reporting you are nothing? achieved NOTHING of note yet seek to prove you are net positive cos you have some circled merits and other legends are worth nothing and are spammers if they have low merit??

So really cos all the moles just come back straight after ...then you are pointless right now? we can agree since you will not list any real accomplishments we can look back on the history of crypto and just not even look at what you did cos there is not net gain to demonstrate really?

I mean really to push you into net negative territory won't be that hard. Maybe I will be a big fucking coward piece of shit and start looking at yours for a tiny tiny error because it will not take much to create argument for you being net negative really.

I can't wait to tell low merit legends how most of them are spammers according to you? or is that not what you are saying I have still not had a simple yes or no??

Look it is easy YES

NO

I can do it all the time. Try it then we move to some of your other lies.

The thing is i don't give one fuck about your or your lies at all. I just want you to fuck off and stop talking to me at all. Stop coming replying to everything I say (because I can demonstrate you have hounded me and been negative 1st to me on the vast vast vast majority of times when I have never hardly ever sort you out to talk to you first.) I will still see you off dt and never a mod and hopefully take your merit source away for what you have done here with this shit you tried to pull on me today. I see may now  need to raise you to scammer really because such devious sneaky dirty tactic is quite something a scammer would do.

You are damaged goods a sad little loser who can not tell me one accomplishment but wants to tell all pre merit legends his seniors and his betters they are mostly all spammers

LOL you are funny and pointless.

I'm happy to keep you amused.

So that evidence thing for the bolded part... coming today or not? or ever? or will you just keep lying and hoping that no one will notice the complete absence of proof?


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on December 22, 2018, 04:01:41 AM
Going to hav change thread title
""top 200 merit recievers problem with cryptohunter""
Gong to hav 2 change username to "Cryptohunter's Sole Sockpuppet Supporter".


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 22, 2018, 04:14:46 AM
Going to hav change thread title
""top 200 merit recievers problem with cryptohunter""
Gong to hav 2 change username to "Cryptohunter's Sole Sockpuppet Supporter".

@CRYPTOHUNTER: YES OR NO, IS Chosen Username YOUR SOCKPUPPET OR NOT? DON'T REPLY HERE UNLESS YOU ANSWER MY QUESHIN.

I hope I did it right.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 22, 2018, 04:27:01 AM
Going to hav change thread title
""top 200 merit recievers problem with cryptohunter""
Gong to hav 2 change username to "Cryptohunter's Sole Sockpuppet Supporter".

LOL at this poor imbecile. What are you doing here with your high profit sig that now you mention it I notice many gang members are wearing. This is of great interest to me too.

So

vast majority ...All DT, merit sources, hoping for mod and nicely high paid sigs.

vast majority ...have accomplished nothing of note except getting on highly paid sig campaigns
vast majority..... have a lot of cycled merits.
None have ever won a debate with me and they end up demoralised and desperate.

LOL what a bunch of losers we have here.

Admit it to me, you have never mattered here and you never will.

Imagine these "mostly  " spammer legends who have created amazing projects that will go down in histroy  and you merit hoarders will go down for being a joke in the grand scheme. HAHAHA

Do you love how TP is trying to demonstrate he has at least one minor ability to use a spell check.... LOL have you noticed most people who have to point out some tiny minor ability that is not at all indicative of anything other than reading over your post a couple of times for mistakes are fucking imbeciles.  I mean most spelling nazis are demonstrated as total retards once any prerequisite of logic or reason comes into play. So not surprising he is trying to demonstrate others don't care to read over their work when dealing with imbeciles because their opinion means nothing. They are of no consequence obviously. They feel they are bragging over things most would be ashamed to admit they have given any consideration. LOL

Tell me why one such as I should even reply or talk to you. One reason based on our clearly different level of accomplishments here and the fact you have never even once won a debate with me?

Now that you realise there is no hope... TP who has no ability to debate or do anything more than very basic tasks tries to divert into demonstrate he can at least use a spell checker.

I will only respond to you both if you address me as True legend cryptohunter from now on. I don't feel any connection to you pseudo legends who are not actually even legends at all.

I mean nobody will even mention you in the history of crypto currency so how are you legends.

Can you tell me why you should even have a legendary title?? I don't understand why you will feature in any part of crypto currency history.

Actually now that I think about it which projects are you part of??? I mean crypto projects obviously the pharmacist being a fucking total loser even managed to lose out of PIVX that dumb fool. I mean how can you lose on that? do you know I had 20 masternodes and sold at the top TP. Maybe you bought some of my bags.  Or of the other millionaires that thanked me some publicly for making them a fortune. Whilst some imbecile that never leaves his room and tries to bully on the weak on here lost money on it. Hahah keep checking those spellings you fool and spamming for dimes.

How does it make you feel that you even bother to spell check and i just don't find you worthy. In fact I enjoy leaving it scrappy for you pieces of cowardly trash so that you have something to cling to and try to feel at least some worth  .......haha

I actually love the fact I've bumped into some clowns like you .... It feels so good to find a gang that have grouped up and started to bully people around and use cowardly sneaky filthy tactics to get their own way.... then just own them all so hard in public that they actually hate you. All the simpering grovelling brown nosing fans get to watch them destroyed over and over and over and over again. They watch them reduced to the filthy wretches that they are.

You see I can say these things to you because they are true. I can say you have never won a debate with me and you can not answer anything so you remain silent. You are 7 or 8 people and high high high merit cycle club apparently amazing posters. LOL I owned every one of you. I forced you to admit here you are nothing, you have achieved nothing whilst i just keep boasting on and on about achievements that you can only dream about. Hahaha and that is just a small number of them.Imagine to all those reading your fans and simpering ass kissers from meta how it must burn that you are revealed to be NOTHING and have done NOTHING. Yet you cowards try to get me banned for simply demonstrating merit is a subjective bunch of nothingness that you want to cling to because you think it proves you are something. I feel pitty for you but I can not keep being nice if you are to be cowardly jackals sniping and back stabbing with your sock puppets.


I mean I can not believe how simple it is here to make a fortune and still a loser like you TP is grovelling around spamming for a few bucks..... all the time moaning about noobs doing the same thing. Those financially motivated posters...yuck. Remove your sig the pharmacist and remain a broke bum for the rest of your life. I will give you a few wireless coins if you like to keep you in the luxury that you're obviously accustomed to.






Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: Chosen Username on December 22, 2018, 04:52:57 AM
Going to hav change thread title
""top 200 merit recievers problem with cryptohunter""
Gong to hav 2 change username to "Cryptohunter's Sole Sockpuppet Supporter".

. What are you doing here with your high profit sig that now you mention it I notice many gang members are wearing. This is of great interest to me too.

thyne sprekith it "chipmixer crew"

Going to hav change thread title
""top 200 merit recievers problem with cryptohunter""
Gong to hav 2 change username to "Cryptohunter's Sole Sockpuppet Supporter".

omg i shld hve chse that!!!!!



obfuscate meine Sprache oder wie ein speeddealer lol


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: LoyceMobile on December 22, 2018, 05:09:56 AM
This comes to mind:
https://memegenerator.net/img/instances/x300/30911746/arguing-with-stupid-people-is-like-playing-chess-with-a-pigeon-no-matter-how-good-you-are-at-chess-t.jpg
(source (https://memegenerator.net/instance/30911746/playing-chess-with-pigeons-arguing-with-stupid-people-is-like-playing-chess-with-a-pigeon-no-matter-))


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 22, 2018, 05:13:21 AM
Can you tell me why you should even have a legendary title?? I don't understand why you will feature in any part of crypto currency history.

I doubt anyone in this thread (except you) really gives much of a shit about that title. You're the one so insanely focused on it. If you don't like me wearing it please ask theymos to rename me to Newbie. I promise you I'll be fine and won't cry for more than 5 minutes.

Nor does any sane person believe that a title given for being a forum poster for 3 years with ~1000 posts has any bearing on "crypto currency history".

This comes to mind:

We need a meme for "stupid people with German suckpoppets".


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on December 22, 2018, 08:45:57 AM
I don't really get the whole problem??
The merit system is a pyramid structure.
You like it or not on the top sits Theymos and after that are the merit sources.
The most logical thing is that the list of the top 200 is filled with merit sources.
Another thing is that big part of the crowd here uses the merit as a "thank you" so some people merit back the sources apart of the fact that they make valuable posts.
So you end up into the current situation which is perfect logical.
The room for abuse is almost 0, but the "rich getting richer" logic is not exactly right.
Users with experience have a higher chance of getting merit, because they know how to help the newbies. The Newbies on the other hand have to gain knowledge (and reputation) before they can be helpful and get merit.
Opinions/suggestions/pure spam/etc from illiterate/ignorant people who are not interested in crypto currencies, do not contribute to our ecosystem here and lead to those user to be listed on most merit sources (and common users) ignore lists.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 22, 2018, 01:00:34 PM
So please state it again

Yes or no - most pre merit legends are spammers. A simple yes or no I don't want is enough for me...bla bla bla

You wil try and weasel out of it....now state after me. I suchmoon state that most pre merit legends are spammers. Or just say yes i believe all pre merit legends are spammers. SImple.

I never said otherwise so not sure what you want from me. Yes, I think most pre-merit Legendaries are spammers. Do you need that notarized?

we will move to your other statements (lies) later.

It is though true isn't it, aside from whack a mole reporting you are nothing? achieved NOTHING of note yet seek to prove you are net positive cos you have some circled merits and other legends are worth nothing and are spammers if they have low merit??

So really cos all the moles just come back straight after ...then you are pointless right now? we can agree since you will not list any real accomplishments we can look back on the history of crypto and just not even look at what you did cos there is not net gain to demonstrate really?

I mean really to push you into net negative territory won't be that hard. Maybe I will be a big fucking coward piece of shit and start looking at yours for a tiny tiny error because it will not take much to create argument for you being net negative really.

I can't wait to tell low merit legends how most of them are spammers according to you? or is that not what you are saying I have still not had a simple yes or no??

Look it is easy YES

NO

I can do it all the time. Try it then we move to some of your other lies.

The thing is i don't give one fuck about your or your lies at all. I just want you to fuck off and stop talking to me at all. Stop coming replying to everything I say (because I can demonstrate you have hounded me and been negative 1st to me on the vast vast vast majority of times when I have never hardly ever sort you out to talk to you first.) I will still see you off dt and never a mod and hopefully take your merit source away for what you have done here with this shit you tried to pull on me today. I see may now  need to raise you to scammer really because such devious sneaky dirty tactic is quite something a scammer would do.

You are damaged goods a sad little loser who can not tell me one accomplishment but wants to tell all pre merit legends his seniors and his betters they are mostly all spammers

LOL you are funny and pointless.

I'm happy to keep you amused.

So that evidence thing for the bolded part... coming today or not? or ever? or will you just keep lying and hoping that no one will notice the complete absence of proof?

Lol just had to quote this for historic purposes ...will add to this post later.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 22, 2018, 04:14:10 PM
cryptohunter started a new thread and locked it. I guess that's one way to win a debate - to not have one.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088231

Quote
So 2 days ago the gang tried to abuse the trust system and crush my account. I forced that scoundrel to remove it or prove it was worth a red trust.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086816.0

Now these same pieces of cowardly trash are creating puppet accounts because they know it would look bad if I could prove it was them who did it and trying to get me banned and have now fucked that up because they are thick as shit, and did not notice all links for anything posted in that same post were at the bottom. So they will have a hard time proving that I was trying to claim anything in that post as my own when you click a link in the same post and see where the information came from. These scum suckers have proven my point by trying to silence me and crush my account. We need to one get rid of the cancer at the top levels of this forum before worrying about the spammers at the bottom. I mean how has it escaped the notice of everyone here that most of these if not all are wearing the same high paying sigs??? are you all blind to this?? the pharmacist just listed as him main accomplishment here or one them was to be in this high paying EXCLUSIVE sig campaign. Now I notice dark star runs it and so i believe it is legit cos he seems straight and okay. But still these shits complaining about the board turning into a financial milk cow for posters with sigs are probably milking the board with their needless posts 24/7 which are just their groundless opinions for the most part.

They did not notice because if you read their posts especially if anyone stands up to them with some simple reason, logic and demands for fair treatment you start to find out these highly regarded (by nobody much outside of this echo chamber) noobs are a bunch of actual morons whom under any scrutiny collapse and degrade into making statement that are ludicrous and they will not go back on them.

One of these imbeciles is called suchmoon who claims and has verified this statement to me several times

HE CONSIDERS MOST PRE MERIT LEGENDS TO BE SPAMMERS and states he is dead serious.

at first I thought he was blowing of steam at being defeated publicly in every debate I had with him and he was blowing off steam.

But no, ask him out right, he is saying that.

Also he said to me that I was incorrect and idiotic for saying that some of the 99.93% of users here could make posts as good if not better than some of the 0.13% group he is part of being a high merit cycle club member.

Then if i say something to him that you can not prove you are a liar and you will see what happens to liars on here he says

I strongly suspect it is that asshole that has made that puppet account and trying to shut my account down again. The guy is hating it that he has just realised he is a bottom feeding imbecile who hates to lose an argument and hates even being challenged on anything.

This is very dangerous indeed and this copy and paste is being used as a very dangerous tool by this idiot such moon and his goons.

Now besides the fact I have asked just a few question on legends getting banned for copy and paste infractions threads which suchmoon does not like. However his main problem is that he does not like the fact that I demonstrated merit is being cycled in tight circles on certain boards by certain people.

This gang is infesting all areas of power and influence here and are not trying to shut people down with dubious and worrying tactics.

I mean he believes he can scare me off saying it is him or them doing this with some i'll red trust your or get you banned if you accuse me. Well fuck off you little sniveling turd who has accomplished nothign of note here ever apart from play whack a mole and bully some people around. I will accuse you because it is strange how this little group of

DT trust
Merit source
Wanna be mods ( they do)
top merit buddies and hoarders (time machine involved apparently)
top paid sig club (whilst moaning about financially motivated posting)

all needs to be taken away from them

Let me list this band of cowardly moronic scum

The pharmacist - a total moron who makes a mockery of the merit system just by having any. Pretends to be humble and nice but as soon as he spot someone weaker than him (not many around) he starts to get all evil and bullying with them. Insisting some poor noob making a thread on "meta" of all places with a compilation of guides that he clearly listed he got from various places on the net... said he was claiming the work as his own and gave red trust and tried to get him banned. Tyrant piece of scum.



Suchmoon - a caustic negative shitposter that can not debate anything without getting destroyed and reduced to a blabbering imbecile that screaming most pre merit lengends are spammers and that 99.93% of active users are incapable of posting anything as good as the 0.13% - how can people with these pre conceived ideas be in such positions on this board.

LocyeV - another complete fool who is good for pulling data only any  simple conversation and he falls apart and starts crying and saying you are on ignore.  His logic if he is AI is not a threat to anyone but itself. This alarmingly dangerous moron merits the sock puppet account from his friends reporting me for ban and the link to the information posted is in the actual post 2 link at bottom that one. He is always meriting dumb stuff remove his merits and take him back to noobie.

Lauda - scam supporting self contradicting turn coat and apparent recent thief that is already removed from damaging the community from positions of trust and power - how is this devious skank still posting here anway?

Malboroza - not sure about this nutcase too much, but he looks very dubious too.

these people talk down to everyone voicing their groundless and self serving opinions and seek to silence via these disgusting tactics anyone that goes against them.

Stand up to this scum before it is too late.

How come people even allow these scabs to become such a powerful gang here going around being total assholes spamming and milking the board just as bad as anyone else.

Get these scumbags out of dt trust and anything else they can start to dominate and bully people around.

I was warned after I spoke up for people in the ban appeals they will come for me. I don't give a shit and I am not going to delete my post history to hide any little shit mistakes from these divs.

If I am not net positive here then those bunch of non achieving divs will be going too.

Also such moon thinks it is funny that he can take sentances I write in my posts and put them in his avatar - to show he can copy and paste but nobody else is allowed to ....  get this scum bag put back to junior too, or even bad this piece of shit.



Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: o_e_l_e_o on December 22, 2018, 04:26:03 PM
He did the same thing on this one (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086816.60) after launching a tirade of nonsense about me. He's wrong, he knows it, he knows everyone else knows it, but wants to remove their ability to point it out.

It's why I've pretty much bowed out of this issue/drama - if someone is so scared of what their opponents have to say that they have to forcibly silence them, then there is no point even having a discussion with them. If they want to live in their echo chamber with their fingers in their ears and ignore all sense and reason, then you might as well just leave them to it.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: Lauda on December 22, 2018, 06:29:19 PM
He did the same thing on this one (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086816.60) after launching a tirade of nonsense about me. He's wrong, he knows it, he knows everyone else knows it, but wants to remove their ability to point it out.
One way to try avoiding negative ratings for lying is to insult and argue (again, with lies) against everyone thereby being able to call them out for "bias" and other nonsense ("losing debates"). This is what the baboon has been doing. Once you start making up fantasies about "gangs" when there clearly are none, you know you've lost.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 22, 2018, 07:21:14 PM
He did the same thing on this one (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086816.60) after launching a tirade of nonsense about me. He's wrong, he knows it, he knows everyone else knows it, but wants to remove their ability to point it out.

It's why I've pretty much bowed out of this issue/drama - if someone is so scared of what their opponents have to say that they have to forcibly silence them, then there is no point even having a discussion with them. If they want to live in their echo chamber with their fingers in their ears and ignore all sense and reason, then you might as well just leave them to it.

LOL this fucking liar proven here because he is too fucking stupid to understand how time stamps work the dumb fuck.

Where is my public apology you fucking div

Read you are a liar..

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086816.msg48784626#msg48784626

you see you are all completely fucking stupid and jackal like cowards.

Where is you major accomplishment on this forum mr net positive.... I await your answer.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 22, 2018, 07:26:59 PM
He did the same thing on this one (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086816.60) after launching a tirade of nonsense about me. He's wrong, he knows it, he knows everyone else knows it, but wants to remove their ability to point it out.
One way to try avoiding negative ratings for lying is to insult and argue (again, with lies) against everyone thereby being able to call them out for "bias" and other nonsense ("losing debates"). This is what the baboon has been doing. Once you start making up fantasies about "gangs" when there clearly are none, you know you've lost.

LOL this dumb shit scammer appears.

Trouble is he is a disgraced scammer and loser who nobody takes seriously.

Hey scam promoter and enabler LaudaM dash protector how are you?

When I find the next project you are escrowing for I will be PM and messaging everyone on the forum what kind of scoundrel is going to be looking after their money for them...FOR GOOD probably.

I'm still waiting for the proof of my lies you have?? where is it you scabby trashy skank..

I used to love watching anonymint owning you over and over and over when you tried to be smart. You just looked laughable and you  got him banned because he was embarrassing you over and over and over until I felt sorry for you.

Stop sniping near me or say good bye to being escrow in future. I will find the project manager and tell them and  I will tell investors how irresponsible it would be to entrust you with anything you dirt bag. Who would invest in a project with a proven scam enabler and scam promoter holding the funds...lol


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 22, 2018, 07:39:26 PM
too fucking stupid to understand

You seem to be too stupid to understand how multiposting works. Please refrain from breaking the rules. If your posts get deleted there will be a never-ending whine fest and nobody wants that.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 22, 2018, 08:12:24 PM
too fucking stupid to understand

You seem to be too stupid to understand how multiposting works. Please refrain from breaking the rules. If your posts get deleted there will be a never-ending whine fest and nobody wants that.

Get back to the other thread you coward and jackal...bring your gang and remove all of their sigs for 2 years I have an open challenge there. I want foxpoop on that too for the future don't want any of your alts or gang spamming for dollars any longer.



Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on December 22, 2018, 08:25:41 PM
bring your gang and remove all of their sigs for 2 years I have an open challenge there. I want foxpoop on that too for the future don't want any of your alts or gang spamming for dollars any longer.
I'm speaking only for myself here, but I'm not part of any gang and I'm not going to quit Chipmixer because some insane troll has challenged me to do so.  Also, there's no gang except the paranoid schizophrenic voices in your head; the members you're challenging to quit their signature campaigns aren't spammers and no one would benefit from such an arrangement except the real spammers who would apply in droves for the open campaign slots.

If they want to live in their echo chamber with their fingers in their ears and ignore all sense and reason, then you might as well just leave them to it.
Which is what I've been trying to do, but I'm finding it difficult because of all the mud being slung by cryptoscunter.  He's clearly delusional, has gone full-mixan at this point, and I know I'm trying to argue with a mentally-crippled person, and yet I keep replying to his posts.  The pigeon has indeed shit all over my beautiful chess board.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 22, 2018, 08:48:28 PM
too fucking stupid to understand

You seem to be too stupid to understand how multiposting works. Please refrain from breaking the rules. If your posts get deleted there will be a never-ending whine fest and nobody wants that.

Get back to the other thread you coward and jackal...bring your gang and remove all of their sigs for 2 years I have an open challenge there. I want foxpoop on that too for the future don't want any of your alts or gang spamming for dollars any longer.

You don't get to tell other people what to do and neither do I. It makes zero sense for you to keep adding multiple users to your signature removal barter. Let's do it one-on-one or not. For now, since you have reneged on the deal I have reinstated my high-paying signature.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: LoyceV on December 22, 2018, 08:51:05 PM
cryptohunter started a new thread and locked it. I guess that's one way to win a debate - to not have one.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088231
Quote
LocyeV
That's a relief, now cryptohunter has only summoned me five (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5023723.msg48819924#msg48819924) freaking (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5023723.msg48825267#msg48825267) times (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5023723.msg48825438#msg48825438) today (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5023723.msg48826271#msg48826271) alone (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5023723.msg48826554#msg48826554)!
Did you miss me cryptohunter? Do you want some attention? I would have merited your long and locked thread, even though I disagree with it, if it wouldn't have been filled with lies. Now it's not worth reading, so try again.

I don't know what his problem is, he seems to be obsessed with me, high-merited users, DT, Meta and more. And I seem to detect some slight anger issues in his posts :D
It's kinda sad how easy it is to trigger this, and I wasn't even trying that hard here:
This goes beyond feeding the troll, this is like climbing into a lion's den at the zoo and trying to pet him.

One way to try avoiding negative ratings for lying is to insult and argue (again, with lies) against everyone thereby being able to call them out for "bias" and other nonsense ("losing debates"). This is what the baboon has been doing. Once you start making up fantasies about "gangs" when there clearly are none, you know you've lost.
I get the feeling he wants to get tagged by DT, so he can claim how unfair it is. Well, tough luck, I don't tag users for plagiarism, I don't tag them for being idiots, and I don't tag them for being trolls. And I sure as hell don't care what someone who fits all those categories has to say about my forum account :P
I wonder though if he really believes his BS, or is just trolling hard out of jealousy. Being called "gang members" for making this forum a better place, what can I say :D



And since we're on the subject of cryptohunter: what's with the obsession of asking people to remove their paid signature? It's the second campaign I'm in, it's loyal to me, and I'm loyal to the campaign.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 22, 2018, 08:55:46 PM
And since we're on the subject of cryptohunter: what's with the obsession of asking people to remove their paid signature? It's the second campaign I'm in, it's loyal to me, and I'm loyal to the campaign.

Same as the obsession with mod reports, DT, merits, etc. CH probably considers Chipmixer part of the "power" structure here. Didn't bite on my signature deal even though I bet it pays more Howeycoins that all your chipmixers combined.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: LoyceV on December 22, 2018, 09:13:11 PM
CH probably considers Chipmixer part of the "power" structure here.
Participants in this campaign have earned 14908 (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17P52DifaD7YfvzLkX3wrxGVpKcaPHY4y57ZpI-FK754/edit#gid=1700332667)* Merit points, that's about 5% of the total for less than 60 users! It's almost as if spammers aren't accepted and Merit is rewarded for good posts.

* Inaccurate stat as not all new participants are included in that sheet


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 22, 2018, 09:17:19 PM
bring your gang and remove all of their sigs for 2 years I have an open challenge there. I want foxpoop on that too for the future don't want any of your alts or gang spamming for dollars any longer.
I'm speaking only for myself here, but I'm not part of any gang and I'm not going to quit Chipmixer because some insane troll has challenged me to do so.  Also, there's no gang except the paranoid schizophrenic voices in your head; the members you're challenging to quit their signature campaigns aren't spammers and no one would benefit from such an arrangement except the real spammers who would apply in droves for the open campaign slots.

If they want to live in their echo chamber with their fingers in their ears and ignore all sense and reason, then you might as well just leave them to it.
Which is what I've been trying to do, but I'm finding it difficult because of all the mud being slung by cryptoscunter.  He's clearly delusional, has gone full-mixan at this point, and I know I'm trying to argue with a mentally-crippled person, and yet I keep replying to his posts.  The pigeon has indeed shit all over my beautiful chess board.

Really so will not remove sig.

Bring your argument so I can give it 10 seconds glance to pull it to pieces you feeble minded sniveling moron.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on December 22, 2018, 09:18:33 PM
I get the feeling he wants to get tagged by DT, so he can claim how unfair it is.
Remember when digaran did exactly that?  Whatever happened to him, anyway?

It's the second campaign I'm in, it's loyal to me, and I'm loyal to the campaign.
I feel the same way about Chipmixer, though it's not the 2nd one I've been in.  No way in hell I'm going to quit it just to satisfy (which it wouldn't anyway) a mentally ill, rambling, ranting, raving, foaming-at-the-mouth, all-caps-typing, libelous troll.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 22, 2018, 09:27:31 PM
CH probably considers Chipmixer part of the "power" structure here.
Participants in this campaign have earned 14908 (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17P52DifaD7YfvzLkX3wrxGVpKcaPHY4y57ZpI-FK754/edit#gid=1700332667)* Merit points, that's about 5% of the total for less than 60 users! It's almost as if spammers aren't accepted and Merit is rewarded for good posts.

* Inaccurate stat as not all new participants are included in that sheet

I think you missed the part where CH PROVED IN ALL CAPS that merits are meaningless, almost negative really. So in CH's universe all you 60 chippendales are actually worse that the 980 Legendaries who barely scraped one merit or none at all.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 22, 2018, 09:30:25 PM
I get the feeling he wants to get tagged by DT, so he can claim how unfair it is.
Remember when digaran did exactly that?  Whatever happened to him, anyway?

It's the second campaign I'm in, it's loyal to me, and I'm loyal to the campaign.
I feel the same way about Chipmixer, though it's not the 2nd one I've been in.  No way in hell I'm going to quit it just to satisfy (which it wouldn't anyway) a mentally ill, rambling, ranting, raving, foaming-at-the-mouth, all-caps-typing, libelous troll.

thanks for that that's better than your usual arguments.... disprove anything I have said dip shit.

I love that quote though " no way in hell im going to quit it

hahaha thanks thats perfect I'm going to make full use of that

It's you crowning achievement here... why should you hahah  listen fool I'll buy some of my pivX back off you for like what 100x 200x less than I sold it for hahah in real terms. Hahah

You dumb ass.


@ suchmoon

you proved it but i will give you a second opportunity

tell me about your notable achievements here ...aside from whack a mole...   people can just keep coming back cant they. Seems your life is pointless :(  shame

I love how dumb you are... saying increasing years was why you will not make the deal....hahah you think piece of shit. You do see that makes you look like you dont want to do it ....hahah  you fucking illogical poor cowardly dreg.

I mean come on all of you are nothing, you have achieved nothing and I sit here taking the piss out of you all and nothing you can answer me with. NOTHING hahaha

A bunch of net negative trash facing  me a giant of achievements in comparison.



Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 22, 2018, 09:39:58 PM
you proved it but i will give you a second opportunity

tell me about your notable achievements here ...aside from whack a mole...   people can just keep coming back cant they. Seems your life is pointless :(  shame

You're right, FML. I don't have anything to brag about on an internet forum.

me a giant of achievements

It was almost funny but then I remembered that you're saying this seriously.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: LoyceV on December 22, 2018, 09:45:31 PM
It turns out cryptohunter has been going at this for a very long time:
http://i65.tinypic.com/xm5qpf.gif
Please retreat back to the altcoin spam boards, you'll be much happier when nobody reads your posts :P

I get the feeling he wants to get tagged by DT, so he can claim how unfair it is.
Remember when digaran did exactly that?
Of course, and eventually someone has had enough of the trolling, and tags him. And the more he digaran complained about it, the more red trust he collected.
Digaran's English was less good than cryptohunter's, but his troll level was more advanced than just making crap up about users.

Quote
Whatever happened to him, anyway?
I think he gave up after his -16, although some say he may be using an alt-account now.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 22, 2018, 09:53:42 PM
It turns out cryptohunter has been going at this for a very long time:
http://i65.tinypic.com/xm5qpf.gif
Please retreat back to the altcoin spam boards, you'll be much happier when nobody reads your posts :P

I get the feeling he wants to get tagged by DT, so he can claim how unfair it is.
Remember when digaran did exactly that?
Of course, and eventually someone has had enough of the trolling, and tags him. And the more he digaran complained about it, the more red trust he collected.
Digaran's English was less good than cryptohunter's, but his troll level was more advanced than just making crap up about users.

Quote
Whatever happened to him, anyway?
I think he gave up after his -16, although some say he may be using an alt-account now.

hahaha an imbecile returns to help and adds more fucking dumbness to the thread....hahahah

thanks you dumb shit check it out they are scammers i busted them like I am busting your dumb ass

thanks for proving how amazing i have been ...look at your crawling around in my history admiring me wish you were me...hahah

Just going out for a drive in my VERY expensive automobile hahah catch you bums later you broke down cowardly scum

thanks for agreeing to remove your sig for 3 years. i may just take a few of you up on the offer even if pharmacist said no way in hell will he stop paid posting....hahah

show me the made up crap you fool or just look even more stupid....COME ON WHAT HAVE I MADE UP ....I CHALLENGE YOU FOR THE 20TH TIME TO BRING SOMETHING YOU SPINELESS POOR BTC DUST BEGGING SHIT STAIN.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: marlboroza on December 22, 2018, 10:14:57 PM
thanks you dumb shit check it out they are scammers i busted them like I am busting your dumb ass
It doesn't look like kashish948 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=152514 is scammer. I don't know, it seems account has long trading history here. Am I missing something here?

"They are scammers" is statement. Why is kashish948 scammer?


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 22, 2018, 10:46:54 PM
thanks you dumb shit check it out they are scammers i busted them like I am busting your dumb ass
It doesn't look like kashish948 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=152514 is scammer. I don't know, it seems account has long trading history here. Am I missing something here?

"They are scammers" is statement. Why is kashish948 scammer?


I don't need to answer your questions you are nothing. Do you understand now.

I will provide when someone with some power makes me answer why I say that and I will have an answer. You can be sure that anyone who leaves me neg trust is a dumb ass fool or a scammer. You need know nothing more that what I tell you

Do you notice how I talk down to you now like your gang does to new members.

I have earned the right to do so if you  think you are superior to a noob who has yet achieved little. You are but a noob to me having achieved ....well actually nothing. Haha noob moronbozo king of the shit pile of meta gang sig spammers. You imbecile peasant spamming for crumbs and picking on anyone you think is weaker than you.  

Sadly you picked on the wrong person now and although i was willing to be nice to you all at the start even still i was nice after you became hostile to me and then when you try to crush my right of free expression of the truth and use cowardly disgusting tactics to try and ban with sockpuppet accounts cos you are coward scum then now you see I turn a little hostile back.


I don't have to do anything you say ever. Get that now you dumb piece of shit. Did someone say you have some power here??

Now get lost sniveling sig spamming wretch.

will you remove your sig for 3 years

yes or HELL NO !!!





Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 22, 2018, 10:57:33 PM
I don't need to answer your questions you are nothing. Do you understand now. I will provide when someone with some power makes me answer why I say that and I will have an answer.

Since you said this...

I think it is time for you to be removed from any positions of trust or power and that goes for the entire gang.

... and have not removed me yet from any positions I think this means I have the POWER. Probably the whole "gang" does, including marlboroza. You have to answer him. Your own rules. Unless you extend it again to 3 years.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 22, 2018, 11:10:31 PM
I don't need to answer your questions you are nothing. Do you understand now. I will provide when someone with some power makes me answer why I say that and I will have an answer.

Since you said this...

I think it is time for you to be removed from any positions of trust or power and that goes for the entire gang.

... and have not removed me yet from any positions I think this means I have the POWER. Probably the whole "gang" does, including marlboroza. You have to answer him. Your own rules. Unless you extend it again to 3 years.

I just realised I have more power than all of you... It's great to have all this power.

Imagine the power to say what have you achieved here and hear silence in return from you all...... that is power.

Imagine the power to challenge the gang to remove their sigs and they say HELL NO WAY --- that is power.

Imagine the power to own the entire gang over and over and over again and again until they say boohoo most pre merit legends are spammers or the will not answer or try to back peddle when they have been shown what they have just said is full moron hahah.... that is power

Imagine the try not 1 time to fuck me but 2 times and i stick it back to them and now destroy their trust and small credibility ......that is power.









Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 22, 2018, 11:13:55 PM
I just realised I have more power than all of you... It's great to have all this power.

Imagine the power to say what have you achieved here and hear silence in return from you all...... that is power.

Imagine the power to challenge the gang to remove their sigs and they say HELL NO WAY --- that is power.

Imagine the power to own the entire gang over and over and over again and again until they say boohoo most pre merit legends are spammers or the will not answer or try to back peddle when they have been shown what they have just said is full moron hahah.... that is power

Imagine the try not 1 time to fuck me but 2 times and i stick it back to them and now destroy their trust and small credibility ......that is power.

I can't imagine any of that. Sounds like something you made up. And there is more plagiarism in your post history, as if you're some kind of shitposter or something: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg48828854#msg48828854


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 22, 2018, 11:23:26 PM
I just realised I have more power than all of you... It's great to have all this power.

Imagine the power to say what have you achieved here and hear silence in return from you all...... that is power.

Imagine the power to challenge the gang to remove their sigs and they say HELL NO WAY --- that is power.

Imagine the power to own the entire gang over and over and over again and again until they say boohoo most pre merit legends are spammers or the will not answer or try to back peddle when they have been shown what they have just said is full moron hahah.... that is power

Imagine the try not 1 time to fuck me but 2 times and i stick it back to them and now destroy their trust and small credibility ......that is power.

I can't imagine any of that. Sounds like something you made up. And there is more plagiarism in your post history, as if you're some kind of shitposter or something: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg48828854#msg48828854

what part do you not get that I am not concerned about you and your gang I mean asking a mod to ban me .... imagine getting banned for stopping the biggest scam in history on this board you dumb cunt.

I am not worried so stop telling me about it just get it done you fucking piece of cowardly shit. If I will be banned for fighting a hugea scam then my friends will join this board to destroy you alll over and over and over again with my legendary story and what a bunch of non achieving scum you are for trying to even ban someone who was a REAL LEGEND .... i will live on forever I will instruct all of my friends to join and tell my story and your lack of achievements over and over and over and over,

CRYPTOHUNTER will live on and on and on and on ... if only in spirit haahhah you stupid dumb cowardly shit stain. I can not lose do you not get it?

How can you handle looking so pathetic and petty ... I mean you are at a point now you can never win from you just do not see it. You should just use an alt now if i were you newbie such moon.

YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND I DONT GIVE ONE FUCK IF YOU FIND SOME MISQUOTED LAZY QUOTE NON QUOTED COPY AND PASTE SHIT ON MY ACCOUNT ....IT WILL NEVER BE FINANCIALLY MOTIVATED IT WILL NOT EXIST YOU DUMB FUCK

IT WILL EITHER BE FIGHTING SCAMS OR FIGHTING FOR FAIRNESS - EITHER WAY I WILL NEVER GET BANNED FOR COPY AND PASTE BECAUSE THERE WILL NEVER BE SELFISH MOTIVE.

SO DONT BOTHER ME WITH IT AND LOOK EVEN MORE PATHETIC AND PETTY AND SUCH A SORE LOSER THAT YOU WILL NEVER BE LIKE THE REAL LEGEND THAT IS CRYPTOHUNTER..... GETTING IT YET LOSER. EVEN WHEN A REAL LEGEND IS TAKEN DOWN BY HOARDS AND HOARDS OF JACKALS AND BACKSTABBING COWARDLY CUNTS. THEY WILL LIVE ON IN THE MEMORY OF OTHERS AND THEIR FRIENDS WHO WILL JOIN TO MAKE SURE HE IS NEVER FORGOTTEN.





Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 22, 2018, 11:32:01 PM
what part do you not get that I am not concerned about you and your gang I mean asking a mod to ban me .... imagine getting banned for stopping the biggest scam in history on this board you dumb cunt.

I am not worried so stop telling me about it just get it done you fucking piece of cowardly shit. If I will be banned for fighting a hugea scam then my friends will join this board to destroy you alll over and over and over again with my legendary story and what a bunch of non achieving scum you are for trying to even ban someone who was a REAL LEGEND .... i will live on forever I will instruct all of my friends to join and tell my story and you lack of achievements over and over and over and over,

Do your "friends" speak German? I think I met one of them yesterday.

I will live on if only in spirit haahhah you stupid dumb cowardly shit stain.

How can you handle looking so pathetic and petty ... I mean you are at a point now you can never win from you just do not see it. You should just use an alt now if i were you newbie such moon.

I think you're already on a copious amount of spirits.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 22, 2018, 11:45:32 PM
what part do you not get that I am not concerned about you and your gang I mean asking a mod to ban me .... imagine getting banned for stopping the biggest scam in history on this board you dumb cunt.

I am not worried so stop telling me about it just get it done you fucking piece of cowardly shit. If I will be banned for fighting a hugea scam then my friends will join this board to destroy you alll over and over and over again with my legendary story and what a bunch of non achieving scum you are for trying to even ban someone who was a REAL LEGEND .... i will live on forever I will instruct all of my friends to join and tell my story and you lack of achievements over and over and over and over,

Do your "friends" speak German? I think I met one of them yesterday.

I will live on if only in spirit haahhah you stupid dumb cowardly shit stain.

How can you handle looking so pathetic and petty ... I mean you are at a point now you can never win from you just do not see it. You should just use an alt now if i were you newbie such moon.

I think you're already on a copious amount of spirits.

My friends would never associate with a lowly non achieving cowardly moronic scum like you so don't lie about meeting anyone

Of course I would never crush you like this sober I would have more pitty for you you sad loser ...ha go make a new puppet account to report everything else you find about me. Hurry up and run along you stupid cunt i mean you have made it look like a motivated witch hunt now anyway hahahah you pathetic stupid fool.

I mean can you not imagine how petty and desperate you seem you and your gang trying and trying and failing and failing to shut me down . You can not win, I can not lose from here whatever happens now. Don't you see it yet?





Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: marlboroza on December 22, 2018, 11:47:50 PM
thanks you dumb shit check it out they are scammers i busted them like I am busting your dumb ass
It doesn't look like kashish948 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=152514 is scammer. I don't know, it seems account has long trading history here. Am I missing something here?

"They are scammers" is statement. Why is kashish948 scammer?
~blah~
So, why are they scammer?
Quote
Do you notice how I talk down to you now like your gang does to new members.
I don't remember being member of any gang.

Quote
imagine getting banned for stopping the biggest scam in history on this board you dumb cunt.
Oh, you have stopped Dash in 2014 ::)

Quote
I am not worried so stop telling me about it just get it done you fucking piece of cowardly shit. If I will be banned for fighting a hugea scam then my friends will join this board to destroy you alll over and over and over again with my legendary story and what a bunch of non achieving scum you are for trying to even ban someone who was a REAL LEGEND .... i will live on forever I will instruct all of my friends to join and tell my story and you lack of achievements over and over and over and over,
Is this a treat? Looks like one.
Quote
YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND I DONT GIVE ONE FUCK IF YOU FIND SOME MISQUOTED LAZY QUOTE NON QUOTED COPY AND PASTE SHIT ON MY ACCOUNT ....IT WILL NEVER BE FINANCIALLY MOTIVATED IT WILL NOT EXIST YOU DUMB FUCK

IT WILL EITHER BE FIGHTING SCAMS OR FIGHTING FOR FAIRNESS - EITHER WAY I WILL NEVER GET BANNED FOR COPY AND PASTE BECAUSE THERE WILL NEVER BE SELFISH MOTIVE.

SO DONT BOTHER ME WITH IT AND LOOK EVEN MORE PATHETIC AND PETTY AND SUCH A SORE LOSER THAT YOU WILL NEVER BE LIKE THE REAL LEGEND THAT IS CRYPTOHUNTER..... GETTING IT YET LOSER. EVEN WHEN A REAL LEGEND IS TAKEN DOWN BY HOARDS AND HOARDS OF JACKALS AND BACKSTABBING COWARDLY CUNTS. THEY WILL LIVE ON IN THE MEMORY OF OTHERS AND THEIR FRIENDS WHO WILL JOIN TO MAKE SURE HE IS NEVER FORGOTTEN.
Please put caps down. It looks like you are having nervous brakedown or something.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 23, 2018, 12:48:28 AM
The legend of cryptohunter (who apparently typed this in all caps while driving (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086297.msg48828077#msg48828077)):

NOBODY WILL EVER GET BANNED FROM HERE FOR FIGHTING A SCAM

THE HUGEST SCAM EVER

AND BEATING THEIR ENTIRE ARMY OF SUPPORTERS INCLUDING LAUDA AND THE PHARMACIST

I AND OTHERS WHO JOINED ME BROKE EVAN THAT DAY ...LIKE I HAVE BROKEN YOU ALL AND HE LOST IT AND OFFERED AN AIRDROP WORTH NOW BILLIONS AND BILLIONS AND THAT DAY THE MARKET CAP FOR DASH SCAM SPIKED DOWN 90%

THAT IS WHAT I AND MY FRIENDS ACHIEVED

NOBODY WILL BE BANNED FOR SOME SLOPPY QUOTING OR COPY AND PASTE  HERE

LOOK AT THIS WITCH HUNT ALL RUNNING SCARED AND DESPERATE WHILE I RELAX

THE LEGEND OF CRYPOHUNTER WILL BE IN THE HISTORY BOOKS WHEN CC TAKES OFF AND YOU GUYS WILL BE LOATHED AND DESPISED HAHAHAH

I CAN NOT LOSE NOW .... YOU LOOK SO PETTY SO DESPERATE AND SO COWARDLY WITH YOUR 0 DAY OLD SOCK PUPPETS ...

HAHAHAH

DO YOU THINK MY VERY GOOD FREINDS WILL NOT JUST JOIN AND REMIND EVERYONE OF WHAT YOU LOSERS AND NON ACHIEVERS HAVE DONE HERE ....BECAUSE YOU WISH YOU WERE CRYPTOHUNTER

YOU ARE NOT YOU ARE NOTHING YOU ARE JEALOUS YOU ARE WORTHLESS WORMS

I CAN NOT LOSE FROM HERE I LIVE ON AS I AM OR I LIVE ON IN SPIRIT ..... I MEAN BOASTING ABOUT MYSELF ... I LOVE IT ANYWAY BECAUSE IT IS TRUE..

BUT OTHERS WILL COME TO BOAST ABOUT ME EVER MORE THAN I COULD.....

SO YOUR WITCH HUNT SUCCEEDS I LEAVE A REAL LEGEND THAT JUST STARTED TO MAKE NEW PEOPLE AWARE OF MY PAST ACHIEVEMENTS

MY GOOD AND FAITHFUL FREINDS WILL PROBABLY JOIN AND THEY WILL NEVER FEELING ANYTHING BUT PRIDE AND POINTING OUT ALL THE GREAT ACHIEVEMENTS OF CRYPTOHUNTER AND HOW THESE NON  ACHIEVING COWARDLY JEALOUS AND DESPERATE JACKALS EVENTUALLY FORCED OTHERS TO THEIR WILL AND CRYPTOHUNTER WAS BROUGHT DOWN .............WHAT AN END TO A GREAT STORY

I WILL ASK MY FRIENDS TO TELL IT OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND POINT OUT ALL THE THINGS AND ASK ALL THE SAME QUESTIONS THAT THE GREAT LEGEND CRYPTOHUNTER HIMSELF WAS DOING

I WILL ASK THEY CONTINUE MY GREAT NET POSITIVE WORK FOR FAIRNESS AND EQUALITY FOR ALL.

WHILST OF COURSE TELLING THE LEGENDS TALE OVER AND OVER.... BELIEVE ME THAT STORY IS JUST GETTING STARTED... HOLDING BACK DASH AND STOPPING IT QUITE POSSIBLY PUSHING BTC IN TO 2ND PLACE  AND MAKING UNTOLD AMOUNTS OF PEOPLE GO FROM RAGS TO MILLIONAIRES (NOT THE PHARMACIST THAT DUMB POOR CRETIN) .....THAT IS NOT NEARLY ALL OF IT .....NO NOT AT ALL.

I WONDER WHAT THEY WILL SAY ABOUT ME FOR YEARS TO COME AND I WONDER WHAT THEY WILL SAY TRUTHFULLY ABOUT ALL OF YOU.

OFF TO THE GYM AND THEN OUT FOR A LOVELY EVENING AND TALK TO ALL MY GREAT FRIENDS .....HAPPY SNITCHING DESPERATE FOOLS THAT WILL NEVER ACHIEVE ANYTHING.... WEEEEEEEEEE




I made a mistake to post in the Wall of shame (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4564216) thread. CH and her alt took it as a permission to troll that thread. From now on I'll reply to CH and post any other CH-related stuff only in this thread.

Ok, first of all if you're not familiar with the cryptohunter debacle - lucky you, and do you have any extra room under that rock you've been hiding under?

But there is some genuinely funny albeit cringy stuff there, just don't click on those links and don't get sucked into it if you value your sanity.

You pulled the dragons tail and I am already massively wealthy now thanks to bitcointalk and my excellent trading skills ..and well thanks the pharmacist you did your bit...hahah I'll have a bottle of 2013 Armand de Brignac Rose on you ...thanks dude,.

thanks for proving how amazing i have been ...look at your crawling around in my history admiring me wish you were me...hahah

Just going out for a drive in my VERY expensive automobile hahah catch you bums later you broke down cowardly scum

I am net positive beyond what you will ever be and am a giant of achievements compared to you all

my friends will join this board to destroy you alll over and over and over again with my legendary story

will live on forever I will instruct all of my friends to join and tell my story and you lack of achievements over and over and over and over,


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: Chosen Username on December 23, 2018, 03:34:14 AM
I made a mistake to post in the Wall of shame (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4564216) thread. CH and her alt took it as a permission to troll that thread. From now on I'll reply to CH and post any other CH-related stuff only in this thread.


mistake deleting it to
makes u look foolish
foolish calling me her alt 2


From now on I'll reply to CH and post any other CH-related stuff only in this thread.

defeat

lmfao

Cryptohunter has been trolling the forum extensively as of late, and there is no reasoning or rebuttal that will get through to him.  He is spreading lies and espousing a conspiracy about a "gang" that exists in his own fantasy world.  

I am therefore vowing to cease replying to any of his posts and put him back on ignore permanently, because I refuse to feed a troll who is so obviously vicious, disturbed, and hungry for attention.  This thread is for members who would like to take the same vow.  I would encourage you to do so, because that's pretty much the only way to get the trolling to stop.

If you want to take the same vow, just write your response here--that's the sole purpose of this thread and is not one for cryptohunter or his sad little alt account to post in.  Those posts will be deleted.


you think so much alike one would almost think you were conspiring like a gang but you are not because you said so

srry SM cant post in ur thread :(


can red trust him
cant ban him
can win a debate

last desperate attempt b4 defeat - run to your threads

tp cant post here
sp cant post there

get rings with those vows ???????


can i post in TPs safe space thread since i am not his alt ???
or do u mean me ??


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: Foxpup on December 23, 2018, 03:45:41 AM
Get back to the other thread you coward and jackal...bring your gang and remove all of their sigs for 2 years I have an open challenge there. I want foxpoop on that too for the future don't want any of your alts or gang spamming for dollars any longer.
I ought to wear a leash if you're going to keep dragging me into things. And what are you even talking about, anyway? I don't have a paid sig and never have, and I am not an alt of anyone.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 23, 2018, 04:15:10 AM
foolish calling me her alt 2

Your garbled posts are not fooling anyone.

last desperate attempt b4 defeat - run to your threads

It's called starving the troll. And since I'm such a nice person I'm gonna mercy-feed you right here so that you don't die on us. I think this will be great.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 23, 2018, 04:48:55 AM
CH has all the power now
ch can post anywhere now and kick you 2 out of any thread because you cant reply to him

We can still reply to threads. We're just gonna ignore your posts in those threads. Eventually you'll get bored and slither away. The only reason you were able to crap so widely recently is because people tend to engage in discussions and can't immediately see that you only care about you. This all feigned concern about plagiarism bans etc was also just your attempt to whitewash your own copypasta.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: Chosen Username on December 23, 2018, 05:11:39 AM
CH has all the power now
ch can post anywhere now and kick you 2 out of any thread because you cant reply to him

We can still reply to threads. We're just gonna ignore your posts in those threads. Eventually you'll get bored and slither away. The only reason you were able to crap so widely recently is because people tend to engage in discussions and can't immediately see that you only care about you. This all feigned concern about plagiarism bans etc was also just your attempt to whitewash your own copypasta.

CHs .5btc payment for plagarism thread was bad but their is a chance to make it right with hilarious's thread


i cared when their was false red trust put on ch because you couldnt handle his opinion
i cared when you try to use c/p as a weapon to ban him because you couldnt defeat his debate
because righteous


u cn think whatever conspracy about me that makes you feel better





        garbled txt 2 avoid being panthered

u are on ropes hiding in corner now

ta ta


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 23, 2018, 05:20:07 AM
CHs .5btc payment for plagarism thread was bad

Are you trying to weasel out of paying 0.5 BTC?

So shocking.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 23, 2018, 07:06:06 AM
CHs .5btc payment for plagarism thread was bad

Are you trying to weasel out of paying 0.5 BTC?

So shocking.

I have revoked that idea due to the fact many complained it was a silly high figure. The pharmacist told me that there is not that much btc in the entire world so it was completely ludicrous .... I believe his words may have been .. that kind of idea or notion is verging into "suchmoon" territory.

You are the weasel here. Nobody can fail to see it now and never will they forget it. You are all weasels trying to slime into every little position you can. Imagine any of you dirt bags as mods... then again they had laudaM so perhaps this is a real possibility. Hmm my friends are very numerous though so perhaps not that big of a deal I am making friends here daily too in meta I think. I mean aside from you guys of course.

Your dumb ass gang are fucked now they all turned down my 3 year sig ban challenge. I will bring up their paid for posting sig spamming shit whenever I like. Not even one accepted. Haha No way in hell im not getting paid to post.... then.... those financially motivated noob spammers....I love it

My greatest achievement here - err getting into this highly paid sig campaign of course....haha why do you let him post. Say he can have free lodgings in with loyceV in the cellar of your ghetto pad with the other rats.... he likes those ....with some ketchup.


I heard you may have a slightly larger amount of fuck-all than those other broke ass bums. Why don't you help them out with some bucks... well the ones that are not your alts. I mean  Thepharmacist. Don't tell me you can't give him a few bucks to tide him over xmas?#
He rang me in tears saying his landlord is about to push his box out from under that bridge and it is raining there .... the walls are already collapsing from the moisture or I think that is what he said anyway I wasn't paying any attention really. I think i was busy laughing at one your posts detailing your achievements here.

He said he will give you some PIVx as collateral on any loan at the rate I sold them to him. Or his account here that ...well nobody else would touch.

He could just start posting more I guess but you have an issue im afraid... the more he posts his pointless comments where he adds nothing  ....actually just may as well stop there. So the more opportunity one would have to question the need for him to clutter threads with his opinions and ideas that are obviously founded on nothing other than the need to earn some btc dust.

I'm at a party  but I knew you would be here alone so I wanted to say hi and keep you company. For 2 mins.

People here asking what I do (green with envy)... i tell them nothing, I spend money, that's it really now.. can get boring after a time. At the moment it is ThePharmacists actually..thanks... btw.... just today I bought a lovely new watch or 2 for myself it was a tough choice because I wanted the meteorite face with Platinum case. Only white gold available though...go figure. Anyway bought both in the end the platinum one weighs a ton. Don't tell lauda because.. well you know what he's like and the insurance won't pay out again this year.

 I worked out if TP spams his signature 10x per day (i mean we know he can churn out perhaps 50 on a very very bad day ) for.......well ...sadly a very long time then he too could afford to pay for them both.........to be serviced.

 Now, it's going to work like this... I have more PIVX to sell (these are the better variety this time def winners ) but he can't get his greasy mitts on them until 350k sats - same deal as last time. I'll sell him a few then I zip them off for a service. I promise I will send him some pics of them so he can put them on his cardboard wall... i'll use the thick paper this time high insulation value... maybe even that gloss shit that keeps the rain out really well... then again don't get the poor wretches hopes up.










Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 23, 2018, 07:22:01 AM
I have revoked that idea due to the fact many complained it was a silly high figure.

No no, don't backpedal now. I'm sure we can arrange an exception and let you try out this option to see if it really works.

You are the weasel here. Nobody can fail to see it now and never will they forget it. You are all weasels trying to slime into every little position you can. Imagine any of you dirt bags as mods... then again they had laudaM so perhaps this is a real possibility. Hmm my friends are very numerous though so perhaps not that big of a deal I am making friends here daily too in meta I think. I mean aside from you guys of course.

Yes, you're making numerous friends as quickly as you can create sockpuppet accounts.

Your dumb ass gang are fucked now they all turned down my 3 year sig ban challenge. I will bring up their paid for posting sig spamming shit whenever I like. Not even one accepted. Haha No way in hell im not getting paid to post.... then.... those financially motivated noob spammers....I love it

Don't lie. As soon as I removed my signature you started changing the terms in stupid ways to weasel out of it.

My greatest achievement here - err getting into this highly paid sig campaign of course....haha why do you let him post. Say he can have free lodgings in with loyceV in the cellar of your ghetto pad and just handcuff him to


I heard you may have a slightly larger amount of fuck-all than those other broke ass bums. Why don't you help them out with some bucks... well the ones that are not your alts. I mean  Thepharmacist. Don't tell me you can't give him a few bucks to tide him over xmas?

He said he will give you some PIVx as collateral at the rate I sold them to him.

He could just start posting more I guess but you have a dilema... the more he posts his pointless comments where he adds nothing but ....actually just may as well stop there. So the more opportunity one would have to question the need for him to clutter threads with his opinions and ideas that are obviously founded on nothing other than the need to earn some btc dust.

I'm at a party but I knew you would be here alone so I wanted to say hi and keep you company.

People asking what I do... i tell them nothing, I spend money really now. At the moment it is ThePharmacists.... just today I bought a lovely new watch for myself it was a tough choice because I wanted the meteorite face with Platinum case. Only white gold available though...go figure. Anyway bought both in the end the platinum one weighs a ton.


 I mean you would hardly lift it with all of your ailments. I worked out if TP spams his signature 10x per day (i mean we know he can churn out perhaps 50 on a very bad day ) for.......well ...sadly a very long time then he too could afford to pay for a service on both of these for me. Now, it's going to work like this... I have more PIVX to sell (these are the better variety this time def winners ) but he can't get his greasy mitts on them until 350k sats same deal as last time. I'll sell him a few then I zip them off for a service. I will send him some pics of them so he can put them on his cardboard wall... i'll use the thick paper this time high insulation value.

No idea what any of this means. Sounds like you're bragging about something. If you despise us here so much why do you feel the need to post this garbage ? Are we supposed to envy you or adore you... what's the plan?


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 23, 2018, 08:03:07 AM
I have revoked that idea due to the fact many complained it was a silly high figure.

No no, don't backpedal now. I'm sure we can arrange an exception and let you try out this option to see if it really works.

You are the weasel here. Nobody can fail to see it now and never will they forget it. You are all weasels trying to slime into every little position you can. Imagine any of you dirt bags as mods... then again they had laudaM so perhaps this is a real possibility. Hmm my friends are very numerous though so perhaps not that big of a deal I am making friends here daily too in meta I think. I mean aside from you guys of course.

Yes, you're making numerous friends as quickly as you can create sockpuppet accounts.

Your dumb ass gang are fucked now they all turned down my 3 year sig ban challenge. I will bring up their paid for posting sig spamming shit whenever I like. Not even one accepted. Haha No way in hell im not getting paid to post.... then.... those financially motivated noob spammers....I love it

Don't lie. As soon as I removed my signature you started changing the terms in stupid ways to weasel out of it.

My greatest achievement here - err getting into this highly paid sig campaign of course....haha why do you let him post. Say he can have free lodgings in with loyceV in the cellar of your ghetto pad and just handcuff him to


I heard you may have a slightly larger amount of fuck-all than those other broke ass bums. Why don't you help them out with some bucks... well the ones that are not your alts. I mean  Thepharmacist. Don't tell me you can't give him a few bucks to tide him over xmas?

He said he will give you some PIVx as collateral at the rate I sold them to him.

He could just start posting more I guess but you have a dilema... the more he posts his pointless comments where he adds nothing but ....actually just may as well stop there. So the more opportunity one would have to question the need for him to clutter threads with his opinions and ideas that are obviously founded on nothing other than the need to earn some btc dust.

I'm at a party but I knew you would be here alone so I wanted to say hi and keep you company.

People asking what I do... i tell them nothing, I spend money really now. At the moment it is ThePharmacists.... just today I bought a lovely new watch for myself it was a tough choice because I wanted the meteorite face with Platinum case. Only white gold available though...go figure. Anyway bought both in the end the platinum one weighs a ton.


 I mean you would hardly lift it with all of your ailments. I worked out if TP spams his signature 10x per day (i mean we know he can churn out perhaps 50 on a very bad day ) for.......well ...sadly a very long time then he too could afford to pay for a service on both of these for me. Now, it's going to work like this... I have more PIVX to sell (these are the better variety this time def winners ) but he can't get his greasy mitts on them until 350k sats same deal as last time. I'll sell him a few then I zip them off for a service. I will send him some pics of them so he can put them on his cardboard wall... i'll use the thick paper this time high insulation value.

No idea what any of this means. Sounds like you're bragging about something. If you despise us here so much why do you feel the need to post this garbage ? Are we supposed to envy you or adore you... what's the plan?

haha that was fast.... nobody else there snitching with  you.... okay okay ... just another few minutes since I can tell you're lonely again.

Lie? did you see some strange scare quotes or something again?

Go back and check and then read again more carefully I want US ALL to set an example. That's why there was an S on the end of member.
 
When you make a deal try to read the terms you dumb fool.

You agreed for the gang, you bring them and get them to do it or you're not sticking to my deal. Look, I know increasing the years to 3 was a lot for them so if you can get them in on a 2 year deal we'll do it.


Now that deal is still on. BUT the NO WAY IN HELL  was a bit negative I thought from the pharmacist. So I'll work on him publicly and you get on to the other paid2post gang members.

Why on earth would I despise you? You're a lovely guy. Spell checking my entire history here word by word. I should really charge you but since I have more than enough...

You're not supposed to do anything. I mean that's what you're good at right doing nothing well nothing of any real consequence. I was just telling you about my day. Trying to cheer you up, don't get all nippy.

Well as far as you are concerned I know those 2 things will come easily so both will be okay for a start.

Be quick if you want more of my individual one on one attention.  Did the watch pics come through yet? what do you think?




Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: Foxpup on December 23, 2018, 08:35:34 AM
Your dumb ass gang are fucked now they all turned down my 3 year sig ban challenge. I will bring up their paid for posting sig spamming shit whenever I like. Not even one accepted. Haha No way in hell im not getting paid to post.... then.... those financially motivated noob spammers....I love it
Why does this challenge get an extra year added every time I turn around? In any case, as I said before, I don't have a paid sig, so does that mean I'm not part of suchmoon's ass gang, dumb as it may be? I'm beginning to feel left out. :(


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 23, 2018, 08:42:24 AM
Your dumb ass gang are fucked now they all turned down my 3 year sig ban challenge. I will bring up their paid for posting sig spamming shit whenever I like. Not even one accepted. Haha No way in hell im not getting paid to post.... then.... those financially motivated noob spammers....I love it
Why does this challenge get an extra year added every time I turn around? In any case, as I said before, I don't have a paid sig, so does that mean I'm not part of suchmoon's ass gang, dumb as it may be? I'm beginning to feel left out. :(

Yes you are part of it you sly fox. Don't worry I have noticed you are very much part of it. I am including you anyway because you may add one later.

Do you mind the extra years being added? I mean surely with time travel that is kind of a mute point right?


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: Foxpup on December 23, 2018, 08:56:54 AM
Yes you are part of it you sly fox. Don't worry I have noticed you are very much part of it. I am including you anyway because you may add one later.
Curses! My cunning plan has been foiled! Actually, if I'm to accept your challenge, my plan will merely be postponed by three (or more?) years, but I suppose I have the time.

Do you mind the extra years being added? I mean surely with time travel that is kind of a mute point right?
It shows you are unwilling or unable to honour your commitments. How can any of us trust you if that is the case, with or without time travel?


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: marlboroza on December 23, 2018, 10:24:57 AM
I will bring up their paid for posting sig spamming shit whenever I like. Not even one accepted. Haha No way in hell im not getting paid to post.... then.... those financially motivated noob spammers....I love it

best thing to do with safex on bittrex right now?

I see no wallet download in the OP

Any guides available for those with safex on exchanges right now?

https://safex.io/wallet

cheers

wallet.dat doesn't contain any blacknet info. Keep your mnemonic for claiming.
BLK are burned for fair distribution. I think it's for good :)
Keep wallet.dat to prove ownership of burned BLK, in case you did a mistake in process.


thanks for the answer.

It's just impossible to download a full node, same problem as Ethereum.

On chain scaling has been proved to be impossible. ^

This shows why we need small blocks and a second layer for scaling.

unlike ethereum byteball has no blocks

Sure, but it still has a chain of transactions which has become so massive that a full node can't be downloaded on a desktop computer.

it depends on your connection speed, I think most full nodes use remote servers

Actually, it mainly depends on your drive. Even with a fiber optic internet connection, if you don't have an SSD, then syncing just gets insanely slow at some point. If you want a full node, you must use an SSD.
so basically byterbak get rid of blocks and get relativity fast, cheap transactions and finality in exchange for decentralization and ddos resistance? Is this worth it?

Requiring an SSD isn't really sacrificing decentralization; having one dude run all twelve validating nodes is though. And having one dude hand pick a replacement for four of them isn't solving the issue.

This is certainly a major issue.







which? if you mean witness selection please see my previous comment, first time round team is working on it, but network will decide in the future who witnesses will be

well that is promising news anyway.

You sound like shitposter. Are you shitposter?

Also, not addressed yet:
thanks you dumb shit check it out they are scammers i busted them like I am busting your dumb ass
It doesn't look like kashish948 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=152514 is scammer. I don't know, it seems account has long trading history here. Am I missing something here?

"They are scammers" is statement. Why is kashish948 scammer?

THE PHARMACIST I HEARD JUST SAID

"NO WAY IN HELL "  HAHAHAH "NO WAY IN HELL"   WILL I EVER STOP SPAMMING FOR MONEY HAHAHA - the pharmacist
Can you quote exact words where TP said this?

It seems cryptohuner is spamming her signature while telling others what to do:

There are only a handful of real alts worth investing in rather than btc. I would just hold btc if i were you.

If you want to look at others these are the only ones

bitbay
blocknet
piv
byteball
sys

there are a few others but those above are good bets for current market caps.


INDIVIDUAL COIN/TOKEN PRICE IS NOT IMPORTANT ONLY CONSIDER THE MARKET CAP OF THE ENTIRE PROJECT

not sure about shill but best to invest in are the real projects


bitbay
blocknet
pivx
komodo
sys
byteball

do your own research and confirm


I would suggest those that will make the best returns from here on

1. bitbay
2. blocknet
3. byteball
4. pivx
5. komodo


teams with proven talent and staying power

do your own research but there are a few others that could return even better but for me less chances for those ones so didn't mention




Bitbay  for sure

others to consider

blocknet
komodo
pivx
byteball
litecoin


of course you should do research of your own accord

there are other interesting new designs but already they seem to have huge caps

these are ones that I believe are going to make good investments based on extensive research

Look for old teams with real projects with real use cases that are finished or almost finished ... that obviously can design and code.


bitbay
blocknet
byteball

komodo
sys
ltc
eth
doge
pivx


also very low caps with teams that are proven to keep working away

several


who cares what the top 3 on cmc will be?

better to know which 3 will bring the greatest returns.

bitbay
blocknet
komodo
pivx
sys
byteball

my bets are on those

every single project listed in the OP are long shot low probability gambles

of course the under 10 cents is completely irrelevant anyway


the only real projects on this board that are way below value are

bitbay
blocknet
pivx
sys
byteball
komodo

do your homework and pay attention to the initial distribution


if they have a working platform good but i would prefer


bitbay
blocknet
sys
komodo
byteball

Much siganture spam.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 23, 2018, 02:27:54 PM
I think moronbozo has malfunctioned and does not know what signature spam is.

Are you confusing me trying to help others locate the very best alt projects which i have done previously and made many millionaires on this board choosing 6 of the top 10 top risers in the last wave? with spamming you signature at the bottom of your stupid nonsense hoping to gain btc dust yourself?

Don't worry though he will after I explain it on every post of his that I see.

Foxpup can you explain your comments because they just make no sense to me.

Which commitments ?

You are saying that because I was offering to keep the board free of sig spamming for longer each time I made the offer I was not keeping to my commitments ? err explain that in full

You couple of dumb shits haha





Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: Foxpup on December 23, 2018, 02:38:22 PM
Which commitments ?
Sorry, I assumed you were committed to upholding your end of the challenge over the time period in question without unilaterally changing the terms partway through. How silly of me to think that.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 23, 2018, 03:59:32 PM
Now that deal is still on.

The deal was on when I removed the signature. It's most certainly not on anymore. I don't care for other users or multiple years being added, you can deal with that separately. You either do it one-on-one with no strings attached or you don't, the latter being your usual action on pretty much anything - all tall, no walk (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5084723.msg48685327#msg48685327). This was a test if you can be trusted to a simple minor thing and you failed horribly.

Speaking of being a failure, you have promised to remove us from all positions of "power" and even get us banned. Are you waiting for someone else to do that as well?


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: coolcoinz on December 23, 2018, 05:44:17 PM
You pulled the dragons tail and I am already massively wealthy now thanks to bitcointalk and my excellent trading skills ..and well thanks the pharmacist you did your bit...hahah I'll have a bottle of 2013 Armand de Brignac Rose on you ...thanks dude,.

thanks for proving how amazing i have been ...look at your crawling around in my history admiring me wish you were me...hahah

Just going out for a drive in my VERY expensive automobile hahah catch you bums later you broke down cowardly scum

I am net positive beyond what you will ever be and am a giant of achievements compared to you all

my friends will join this board to destroy you alll over and over and over again with my legendary story

will live on forever I will instruct all of my friends to join and tell my story and you lack of achievements over and over and over and over,

This is like something Roger Ver and Craig Wright would write. Do you remember that famous Ver interview when he showed people the finger and said "I'm a self made millionaire, I was a millionaire before I made bitcoin cash it's not bcash, apologize, I demand an apology"?

Or famous Craig: "I don't care what you think, I have more money than your country".

This is the same level of presumptuous and entitled attitude, but they at least are rich and can prove it.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: marlboroza on December 23, 2018, 06:50:46 PM
~
It looks like shilling for few alt coins and spamming signature.
Quote
Don't worry though he will after I explain it on every post of his that I see.
You will post another lie? Another conspiracy theory? What?

You missed this one again:

thanks you dumb shit check it out they are scammers i busted them like I am busting your dumb ass
It doesn't look like kashish948 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=152514 is scammer. I don't know, it seems account has long trading history here. Am I missing something here?

"They are scammers" is statement. Why is kashish948 scammer?
Maybe I should directly ask them why cryptohunter said they are scammer. We don't want to see scammer running around forum, right?


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 23, 2018, 07:32:55 PM
~ switched to a sockpuppet

The boycott is making you a bit desperate this morning, isn't it? Trying to insert yourself in threads on pretty much every one of your favorite topics:

About merits:

merits are now compounding the issue it is strange that nobody can see this

About post reporting:

it is actually a good thing that all this snitcher mentality is soon to be  replaced with a fair and transparent rewarding mentality

[...]

don't worry though I will soon have a few ideas to improve things... leave it to me. that is what being really net positive is about...changing things for the better

About signatures:

I say signatures for mods only at this point. Until a new system is available that does not require a reprogramming of human nature before using it with any hope of success of creating a board that operates in  the same manner and same principles as the entire trustless decentralised arena we are meant to be fascinated with.

Even a direct attempt to bait someone:

o_e_l_e_o  yes I am refering to you you.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: Chosen Username on December 23, 2018, 07:36:57 PM
Trying to insert yourself in threads on pretty much every one of your favorite topics:

CH has all the power now
ch can post anywhere now and kick you 2 out of any thread because you cant reply to him



me to i guess



power is working


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 23, 2018, 07:38:22 PM
power is working

No one responded to those posts yet. Such a waste of "power".


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: Chosen Username on December 23, 2018, 07:44:01 PM
power is working

No one responded to those posts yet. Such a waste of "power".

POW


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 23, 2018, 07:48:46 PM
Which commitments ?
Sorry, I assumed you were committed to upholding your end of the challenge over the time period in question without unilaterally changing the terms partway through. How silly of me to think that.

So you should be sorry moron.

The point is I was making an OFFER to the gang to prove that I would go with out a sig for longer if they would too.

I mean I later even said I have have misread this entire sitiuation and when I thought I was being generous in providing you dumb fools the opportunity to set a good example for longer....haha and really all the time you just want to spam your sigs for btc dust then we can put it back for 2 years.

What you can't grasp is i was offering as an incentive for raise my obligation to the deal.

You dumb shit...that's like me coming to buy your car that I have agreed to pay ...well since it is your car let's say 200bucks then saying I will offer you 300bucks now and you telling me now way stop changing things....

that is unless getting more of a positive thing (more money) is something you usually get upset enough to pull out....haha the strange and wierd world of foxy and the dumb shit gang

So obviously you view removing paid2post for longer as negative thing and do not want to do it at all.

I was offering simply the opportunity for you guys to demonstrate you are more committed enthusiasts that i have given you credit for.

Since you're far to thick to see this then please stop talking about it and proving my point that the gang is all about getting paid2post.

 @ suchmoron

what are you trying to demonstrate???

why not tackle these questions head on in debate

why are you copy and pasting all my posts you sad loser...

why dont you make some posts so that I may demonstrate clearly how you are net negative

a boycott lol what more confirmation these mentally defective fools have no answers to my clearly reasonable questions

I mean where is one reasonable counter argument from any of suchmoon or the paid2post goons.

I was not baiting him I am fully calling him to comment on his actions whilst wagging his stupid tongue about other people who want to be part of the paid2post club he is at the top of.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: marlboroza on December 23, 2018, 08:39:40 PM
why are you copy and pasting all my posts you sad loser...
I double checked this page and no one is copy/pasting your posts. I would appreciate if you could point to exact example of copy paste in this thread.
I was not baiting him
It does look like a bait.
You might want to read this post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086297.msg48847762#msg48847762 it seems you missed question again.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 23, 2018, 08:53:08 PM
You dumb shit...that's like me coming to buy your car that I have agreed to pay ...well since it is your car let's say 200bucks then saying I will offer you 300bucks now and you telling me now way stop changing things....

Is that how you bought your

VERY expensive automobile

Meanwhile IRL your offer sounded like this: you offer $0.20 for an apple and get handed an apple but instead of paying 20 cents you start demanding oranges, grapefruits, cantaloupes, and watermelons by the truckload.

what are you trying to demonstrate???

why not tackle these questions head on in debate

Because I'm responding to you only in this thread, remember? We can debate it here if there is anything to debate. It's all public just like those other threads, with the added bonus that ANY of your delusions are on topic here. You wouldn't want to be intentionally spamming the forum, would you?

why are you copy and pasting all my posts you sad loser...

Oh no. Have you reported it or do you want someone else to do it for you?

why dont you make some posts so that I may demonstrate clearly how you are net negative

a boycott lol what more confirmation these mentally defective fools have no answers to my clearly reasonable questions

I mean where is one reasonable counter argument from any of suchmoon or the paid2post goons.

I'll definitely post a reasonable counter argument in this thread as soon as I see you post something reasonable.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on December 23, 2018, 09:22:28 PM
why are you copy and pasting all my posts you sad loser...
I double checked this page and no one is copy/pasting your posts. I would appreciate if you could point to exact example of copy paste in this thread.
I was not baiting him
It does look like a bait.
You might want to read this post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086297.msg48847762#msg48847762 it seems you missed question again.

Do you I have to tell you again that you are of no note and no importance?  I don't need to even answer you nor give you any heed at all?

Are you too stupid to recognise what I am telling you.
I have now a great argument for meta that I am just waiting for one of your fools to give me a suitable in for it ....lol

I mean quoting my posts ......copy paste who gives a shit really apart from you fucking non achieving bottom feeding rats.

I am correctly describing his actions you retarded fool

If he has an issue with it or you do bring it and I will defend it whilst highlighting correctly and observably what a bunch of paid2post hypocrites you  are. I can't wait. I wonder if you can red trust me over a provably correct statement. Give it a try you impotent dirt bag. Let's see about my new thread that will appear instantly .....red trust hahahah  it is going to be your undoing abusing these systems.

Merit system and trust system are broken - i will destroy the credibility of both of those because they are currently tools for centralised power and manipulation. I am using you goons to demonstrate that. What else am I toying with such a bunch of mouth breather for?

I am still very hung over from the drinks I had on the pharmacist last night so I will take my time replying to you all...and mornobozo if you get above your lowly station and start giving me that demanding tone I will just tell you time and time again you are nothing and I need not answer you if I am doing something more demanding like for instance taking candy from a baby.

Why don't you red trust me for tell you now that you are a paid2post financially motivated poster like the rest of your gang.

@suchmoron

Post all of your  stupid questions on a meta thread from now, on i see your ploy to waste my time on this one thread... when I prefer to highlight what a  jealous and petty non achiever with a damaged mind you are to your ex fans in meta.

That shows how concerned I am about your feeble mind. Hurry up I know you can't resist still trying you poor wretch. I will expect all of these in meta threads asap. Now hurry up I don't have all day to spend with you idiots.

come bring your analogy to meta in that thread so I can destroy you all over again whilst highlighting the goons refusing to remove it all over again....

I will just keep offering the challenge I mean the fact they will not do it immediately is brilliant I will never get bored of demonstrating they are not enthusiasts they are paid2post fools that have achieved nothing of note.

This point actually leads nicely into my other larger point that I can keep bitch slapping you and the goons with over and over.

Now I am going back to meta and if you are boycotting me that will play to my plan anyway it proves collusion and fear.




Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on December 23, 2018, 10:33:02 PM
Do you I have to tell you again that you are of no note and no importance?  I don't need to even answer you nor give you any heed at all?
Would be almost true if it wasn't followed by a wall of text.

Merit system and trust system are broken - i will destroy the credibility of both of those because they are currently tools for centralised power and manipulation.
Well, you're destroying someone's credibility for sure, what with your cringy bragging and the puppet show.

Post all of your  stupid questions on a meta thread from now, on i see your ploy to waste my time on this one thread... when I prefer to highlight what a  jealous and petty non achiever with a damaged mind you are to your ex fans in meta.
Nah, this thread is fine for that purpose. I have no interest in assisting your shitposting in Meta. Anyone who cares can find your drama here.

That shows how concerned I am about your feeble mind. Hurry up I know you can't resist still trying you poor wretch. I will expect all of these in meta threads asap. Now hurry up I don't have all day to spend with you idiots.

come bring your analogy to meta in that thread so I can destroy you all over again whilst highlighting the goons refusing to remove it all over again....

I will just keep offering the challenge I mean the fact they will not do it immediately is brilliant I will never get bored of demonstrating they are not enthusiasts they are paid2post fools that have achieved nothing of note.

This point actually leads nicely into my other larger point that I can keep bitch slapping you and the goons with over and over.

Now I am going back to meta and if you are boycotting me that will play to my plan anyway it proves collusion and fear.
Yes, you're winning bigly.



LOL what a fucking moron... you still think your puppet is gonna help your cause.

all start with cryptohunter not agree when one of central gang say "pre merit legends are spammers"

CH point out the fact & data of the still broken aspect & centralize merit system correctly

marlboroza  have most centralized merit history & get angry when data show

marlboroza then try stop CH with fake RED TRUST but had to remove 4 fake
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086816.0

gang cant handle criticism  centralize merit

one of gang make sock first to ban CH on plagarisms
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg48790244#msg48790244
& fail   -  source was there

next marlboroza main account start digging for plagarisms again to shut down CH with 4yoa post
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg48828854#msg48828854
& fail again

keep digging

marlboroza dig posts still today try to ban CH
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086297.msg48837494#msg48837494
still fail

this dirty tactic of marlboroza shut down opinion by search ancient post  4 plagarisms
we not worry about ""plagarisms"" in 2013-2014 like now

TP & SM hide from subject in threads

I say dirty tactic used

you think good to use tactic ?
how u feel if marlboroza search all your old post 2 ban u on technical if u disagree with marlboroza ?


marlboroza try find me 2 to dig 4 plagarisms but wont expose

apology - have to hide writing type or be attack by dirty tactic



Gone full "Animal Farm" with this one:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088852

I am in favour of removing sigs for everyone except mods and a handful of people that have  strict criteria handed down to them to keep order but it is applied to everyone fairly and equally.

Apparently the fix to "centralized power" (or whatever the gripe is) would be to make some users more equal than others.



I was hoping for some new entertainment this morning and CH didn't disappoint.

Merit butthurt:

Good post and I am glad you made the effort to make it. However I am unable to merit it at this point. I will though in future if it is proven to make my post redundant and demonstrate it is of zero merit value. However I expect all merits removed from your post if it turns out to be a bunch of words that does not rebut my post nor even tackle the prime points I make.

[...]

Or will I here now provide reasonable and corroborating evidence that this is a post that gains a bunch of merit for something that tries to refute something that is clearly provable and observable???

and therefore not only should it not get any merit it should actually get negative merit for trying to convince people of something that is clearly NOT true.

[...]

Each person should remove your merits for that post if you can not prove what you have said is correct relating to my post. In adding merit to a post that is negative and not adding merit to a post that is correct and pushes towards improving systems he demonstrates are not only open to corruption but are being used by a gang to stifle free speech......that is a system that needs to be fixed or removed. With that in mind all merit scores would be null and void and any meaning read into them should be struck away. To even consider more systems built upon a broken system like that is not going to go well.

Much open-minded:

Let me accept as I am open minded then you COULD be correct about some things. Let me then find the optimal and true answer by having a sensible debate. If you are correct then I will retract my post and put a big RED statement that I am wrong at the top.

[...]

YOU CAN NOT POSSIBLY ARGUE AGAINST THIS OR CALL IT A CONSPIRACY.

Math fail:

some of the 99.93% of current posters (not top200 merit hoarders) are able to make posts as good if not better than some of the 0.13% of the board (top 200 merit hoarders)

Sockpuppeting:

I can tell you now that chosen username (who ever you are) you are worth infinite everyone who dares not speak out about the gang taking over this board and of infinite value above those that will oppose observable instances and events to suite their own personal selfish agendas. You will not be forgotten here forgotten here.

[...]

merry xmas and a happy new year indeed to chosen username and those that have done the right thing since I have been here.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: GreenProfit on January 03, 2019, 03:31:33 AM
I think that this is not a problem.People which have bigger amount of merit have more chance to get more merits,that is true but main reason is because they make high quality posts so If you have 400-500 merit or even more there is more chance that you will get merit because people see that this guy with so much merit is somebody who have good enought writing skills.There is a lot of people also which gives merit only for high quality post so it depends on each person but most times you will get merit even if you are not in top 200 merit receivers.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on January 06, 2019, 03:05:20 PM
I think that this is not a problem.People which have bigger amount of merit have more chance to get more merits,that is true but main reason is because they make high quality posts so If you have 400-500 merit or even more there is more chance that you will get merit because people see that this guy with so much merit is somebody who have good enought writing skills.There is a lot of people also which gives merit only for high quality post so it depends on each person but most times you will get merit even if you are not in top 200 merit receivers.

Incorrect assumption. Also go read my most important thread in meta and bring some rebuttal or just accept what it says.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: mikeywith on January 06, 2019, 10:34:37 PM

just in case you calm down tomorrow and decide to accept the help i am offering you. so i will re-post what you deleted.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 ok bro, let me try to help you with something that might not have crossed your mind before.

and before I do so, i hope you know that i have been here only for a while and i do not give a fudge about any of the members on this forum, neither i am trying to "protect" anyone, but simply stating some numbers here, so before i get accused for being a part of the "gang" i just had to make myself clear.

so, I am going to assume that your "theory" about top merited members circulating merit among themselves is true, and i am going to explain to you something based on that theory.

just because those merit have been "circulated" it does not mean they did so based on a "gang master plan", it is simply because those members are

1- the most active on the forum and the most deserving
or/and
2- they have the most sMerit so each one of them has a huge chunk of someone else's merit simply because those with more merit will always send more merit than those with less merit ! WTF , complicated ? ok look at my merit fans .

https://i.postimg.cc/Wb45nKbZ/merit.jpg

ignore "frodocooper" and "criptix" since
1- they are not on your suspect list.
2- frodocooper is a moderator of the mining board where i am usually active and criptix seems like a daily trader who likes my btcusd analysis and find them useful.

so just for  the sake of explanation i'l put suchmoon as my no.1 fan.

it's not because suchmoon gets anything in return for merting my posts, neither he/she knows me " i don't even know if suchmoon is a he or she to begin with" , never had anything to do with him/her. 

There is only 1 main reason why suchmoon gave me the most merit compared to the others : suchmoon has the most sMerit among those others who merited my posts ! , and look who is next ! another member of the "gang" .

this is mainly because those people have the most sMerit . i know you could argue about the amount of the merit "they" sent me is nothing compared to what they send to each other, but those merit i got are mainly in a month period of posting, if i keep my post quality the same, perhaps in a few more months i will have maybe a 1000 merit with at least 70%-90% merit coming from the "gang".

and also quite frankly,  i do think my merit fans deserve my sMerit the most, i am simply trying to merit newbies and members to "encourage" them , i sometimes see a good post for suchmoon or LoyceV and i end up giving the " a few" merit i have to other lower rank people with quality posts just to help them level up, even though i know this is wrong , but make no mistake, if i see a very high quality post by suchmoon i'l give him/her all the merit at my disposal simply because he/she deserve it. despite the fact that i disagree with a lot of suchmoon points of view specially that to do with "DT TRUST" which i discus with him/her a few times and never ended up agreeing to one another, but long story short IMO those guys are top quality posters and they deserve the merit they got.

i hate to make long posts, and here i am making a wall text, but let me help you even more.

why not collect  shitposts from the "gang members" that was merited by the other "gang members" so that we all know your theory is correct. ?
if you manage to do so , you have a valid point and you got my support against the "gang", but ! if you fail to do so, then those merit were deserved and regardless of their sources your whole argument is wrong.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sadly mikey and suchmoons reply to mikey had to be deleted.
The reason is clear.
Mikey runs around starting conversations then not finishing them.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088852.0


i finish my conversations, i just don't finish the debate you want to start, you have been debating this topic for ages now, and you have not finished it, how will i make any difference towards the ending of this drama ?

plus, i have more things to do both in life and on the forum than having to reply to every single thing you or any other person say to me,in your topic i even ignored suchmoon reply to my post because i know it was going to be and endless debate with him/her, so i decided not to reply "because i am not obligated to reply to anybody if i don't want it, or if i have no time or mood for it" so it is nothing personal !

 also the length of your replies makes it hard for me to follow, i really don't enjoy reading very long posts, i asked you a simple a question,  i expect a simple a answer not a very long reply that will take me 30 mins to read, i am a slow reader, never went to English school so i really put a lot of effort trying to read a whole newspaper long reply, if you would sum your question in a line or two i will be happy to answer it " if i have the time and mood for it", i might be on my man-monthly-period and have no mood to reply, this shouldn't make you mad. just move on.


i do not understand why did you delete my post, i am really trying to help you and ease your pain, i mean the "gang" are still getting all the Merit despite your trials, so i gave you 2 things to work with.
1- admit to "yourself at least", that your theory is wrong > i explained why do i think their merit were circulated.
2- prove that they "intentionally" circulated the merit among themselves not based on quality post what so ever.

I do not think you have any other options, sorry to say bro, and if you are mad at me for trying to help, i am sorry again, put me on ignore if you wish.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on January 08, 2019, 03:41:56 AM

just in case you calm down tomorrow and decide to accept the help i am offering you. so i will re-post what you deleted.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 ok bro, let me try to help you with something that might not have crossed your mind before.

and before I do so, i hope you know that i have been here only for a while and i do not give a fudge about any of the members on this forum, neither i am trying to "protect" anyone, but simply stating some numbers here, so before i get accused for being a part of the "gang" i just had to make myself clear.

You're more of a gang wanna be like many other saps. Seems you spend enough time defending the gang and see here again 3 gang members are meriting a post that is riddled with anecdotal experiences and again a faux rebuttal. You see the issue is you do not have the capacity to help me. This only helps in one way to again bring out the gang you are supporting with your faux rebuttal and groundless opinions and to demonstrate that you can not have dim witted imbeciles like them in charge of giving out merit.

Stick with me since I know this could be too long for you to concentrate on


so, I am going to assume that your "theory" about top merited members circulating merit among themselves is true, and i am going to explain to you something based on that theory.

There is no argument that they are circulated. Do you not understand the raw data that demonstrates they lose 80% if you remove just their own merits from them without their fav board merits. The fact you think it is up for opinion demonstrates you have no clue about anything

just because those merit have been "circulated" it does not mean they did so based on a "gang master plan", it is simply because those members are

1- the most active on the forum and the most deserving  - says a newbie who does not have the capacity to derive fact from fiction. Who has no  knowledge of their prior contributions to the forum which is practically nothing except what a mole. Your opinion of their posts is nothing other than what your mind will allow you to form. This is not the same as analysing the true value of the content of their posts. Have you also analysed the entire boards posts to date?? no you have not
or/and
2- they have the most sMerit so each one of them has a huge chunk of someone else's merit simply because those with more merit will always send more merit than those with less merit ! WTF , complicated ? ok look at my merit fans .

irrelevant information regarding how much they have to send.... also a flaw in the system that they have so much more than others to send with no set criteria


https://i.postimg.cc/Wb45nKbZ/merit.jpg

ignore "frodocooper" and "criptix" since
1- they are not on your suspect list.
2- frodocooper is a moderator of the mining board where i am usually active and criptix seems like a daily trader who likes my btcusd analysis and find them useful.

so just for  the sake of explanation i'l put suchmoon as my no.1 fan.

it's not because suchmoon gets anything in return for merting my posts, neither he/she knows me " i don't even know if suchmoon is a he or she to begin with" , never had anything to do with him/her.  

There is only 1 main reason why suchmoon gave me the most merit compared to the others : suchmoon has the most sMerit among those others who merited my posts ! , and look who is next ! another member of the "gang" .

this is mainly because those people have the most sMerit . i know you could argue about the amount of the merit "they" sent me is nothing compared to what they send to each other, but those merit i got are mainly in a month period of posting, if i keep my post quality the same, perhaps in a few more months i will have maybe a 1000 merit with at least 70%-90% merit coming from the "gang".

and also quite frankly,  i do think my merit fans deserve my sMerit the most, i am simply trying to merit newbies and members to "encourage" them , i sometimes see a good post for suchmoon or LoyceV and i end up giving the " a few" merit i have to other lower rank people with quality posts just to help them level up, even though i know this is wrong , but make no mistake, if i see a very high quality post by suchmoon i'l give him/her all the merit at my disposal simply because he/she deserve it. despite the fact that i disagree with a lot of suchmoon points of view specially that to do with "DT TRUST" which i discus with him/her a few times and never ended up agreeing to one another, but long story short IMO those guys are top quality posters and they deserve the merit they got.

i hate to make long posts, and here i am making a wall text, but let me help you even more.

thanks for trying to help but honestly you can not help me in your current state..

Another faux rebuttal.

1/ you are not (visibly part) of the gang so I am not bothered about your example about you... since my point was not in relation to you.

2/ I notice you mention suchmoon gave you more merits which again is probably why I see you meriting other shit posts he is making with false statements that are illogical but you dont again have the capacity to see that .. I mean him stating individuals can not objectively rate their own posts is actually false to a large degree, he means they can not be trusted to because the system is subjective and they can not be forced to. Not to mention why be objective in a subjective system. You are obviously a simple minded individual and that is fair enough because you fit in well with the gang. That however does not mean in any way you have formed some kind of rebuttal to my central point.

3/ more of your anecdotal merit earning history and opinions on things which may seem correct to you and may be correct but do not form any kind of rebuttal to my central point. Go read my long explanation with easy examples so that you understand more clearly before bothering to litter my threads with this junk again.

4/ If you can not be bothered or not capable of reading explanations to HELP YOU understand why you a presenting faux and empty rebuttals then why should I even bother to try and help you?

why not collect  shitposts from the "gang members" that was merited by the other "gang members" so that we all know your theory is correct. ?

The majority of posts that they make are nothing burgers. These people hide in merit and discuss their merits and how to endlessly enjoy whack a mole or endlessly defend the systems they control. I mean even if they make a valid point in those threads... the entire threads are worthless. Do you really believe any of these people can contribute to this forum like many of the devs out there that are filling in the missing pieces of this trustless decentralised end to end arena that will change the world... or the people that work to support those projects or people that seek to keep this board open transparent and fair for all and maintain free speech



if you manage to do so , you have a valid point and you got my support against the "gang", but ! if you fail to do so, then those merit were deserved and regardless of their sources your whole argument is wrong.

LOL says who? someone with no idea of what logic and reason ?


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sadly mikey and suchmoons reply to mikey had to be deleted.
The reason is clear.
Mikey runs around starting conversations then not finishing them.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088852.0


i finish my conversations, i just don't finish the debate you want to start, you have been debating this topic for ages now, and you have not finished it, how will i make any difference towards the ending of this drama ?

LOL this does not even make any sense. There is no real debate. I just presented some facts that some people did not like. My central points are simply factual observations. The other debates that sparked up just resulted in demonstrating over and over than the gang are a bunch of fools that should not be judging anything or anyone. You came to my most important thread of the year and just made some anecdotal junk post like you just did and derived some strange implied meaning from it that does not exist then tried to say that was a rebuttal. Then ran off when I just tore it to pieces with facts and observable events.


plus, i have more things to do both in life and on the forum than having to reply to every single thing you or any other person say to me,in your topic i even ignored suchmoon reply to my post because i know it was going to be and endless debate with him/her, so i decided not to reply "because i am not obligated to reply to anybody if i don't want it, or if i have no time or mood for it" so it is nothing personal !

No you dont and Don't feel obligated to reply unless you can bring a sensible case for your opinion

 also the length of your replies makes it hard for me to follow, i really don't enjoy reading very long posts, i asked you a simple a question,  i expect a simple a answer not a very long reply that will take me 30 mins to read, i am a slow reader, never went to English school so i really put a lot of effort trying to read a whole newspaper long reply, if you would sum your question in a line or two i will be happy to answer it " if i have the time and mood for it", i might be on my man-monthly-period and have no mood to reply, this shouldn't make you mad. just move on.

I am bored of explaining it 2x already


i do not understand why did you delete my post, i am really trying to help you and ease your pain, i mean the "gang" are still getting all the Merit despite your trials, so i gave you 2 things to work with.
1- admit to "yourself at least", that your theory is wrong > i explained why do i think their merit were circulated.
2- prove that they "intentionally" circulated the merit among themselves not based on quality post what so ever.

I do not think you have any other options, sorry to say bro, and if you are mad at me for trying to help, i am sorry again, put me on ignore if you wish.

What you think is probably factually wrong most of the time.

I am not interested in if they get all of the merits because merit is subjective and meaningless. I am trying to reset merit and install some criteria to give it meaning and make it observably and unquestionably fairer. The fact you are fighting that demonstrates you do not understand the system or how it works or that you believe by ass kissing the gang you can put the broken system to your own personal gain.

I explained in the last thread why you were deleted. You could have come back with sensible data like the gang members top 10 fans and receivers (SOMETHING RELEVANT ) you did not ... bring them here and we can discuss.



If that was all too long for you then here is something very easy to understand

1. I am pushing to make a subjective system (that by its nature leaves it open to abuse) a more objective one that means it is fairly applied to each member.

2. Even if you do not believe that it is possible for people to act selfishly when there are no rules when there is financial and other benefits for doing so - - that does not mean it is not possible.

3. By trying to defend the current system you are simply fighting against making it a fairer more objective one that has real value and can not suppress free speech. Why would you wish to even do that?

If you do not understand any of that then go back to the thread you ran away from and then take your time reading through it.

If you have questions then come and ask me or post them there.

I suspect you have been INSTRUCTED by your gang idols not to reply to me on meta because they want me marooned out here on rep. That will not work so come back to the meta thread you ran away from and start posting there. I gave this post a 5 min glance and that was more than honestly it deserved. Come back to meta to the thread you seemed to slink away from and continue there. Then I will give it more attention

This post may seem like I am being an asshole to you. I am not. It is simply the nicest way I can put it. Either you are just trolling me or you really do not have the capacity to understand my central point.

I will always reply to you but do not post again until you can bring evidence that refutes what I am proposing needs to be done.I am not interested in anecdotal experiences relating to yourself.

Honestly and I am not being nasty to you. Your posts so far are of negative value and less than that of a spammer. If you do not understand why then read my other thread. It details it for you in black and white. You may not be doing it intentionally and you may even believe that you are presenting some kind of relevant material to my central point. You are not. You are merely obstructing (not greatly of course) the move to a fairer system that can produce some real valuable solid and meaningful data.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on January 08, 2019, 04:05:05 PM
I'm getting nauseous just looking at that wall of text. Got through ~3 paragraphs and it seems mostly the same stuff like "you're in a gang and too stupid to understand my conspiracy theory".


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on January 08, 2019, 06:09:59 PM
I'm getting nauseous just looking at that wall of text. Got through ~3 paragraphs and it seems mostly the same stuff like "you're in a gang and too stupid to understand my conspiracy theory".

Then put through the truth filter suchmoons post reads...


I can't refute or dispute anything cryptohunter says. So i just make other excuses.

Get back to meta fool I am waiting there for you. Your last post was one of your best yet. I salute that level of irony. I can only hope it was intentional.

Or just hide cowering away in the self moderated threads away from scrutiny and facts LOL


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on January 08, 2019, 06:33:42 PM
I'm getting nauseous just looking at that wall of text. Got through ~3 paragraphs and it seems mostly the same stuff like "you're in a gang and too stupid to understand my conspiracy theory".

Then put through the truth filter suchmoons post reads...


I can't refute or dispute anything cryptohunter says. So i just make other excuses.

Get back to meta fool I am waiting there for you. Your last post was one of your best yet. I salute that level of irony. I can only hope it was intentional.

Or just hide cowering away in the self moderated threads away from scrutiny and facts LOL

I'm creating self-moderated threads thanks to your incontinence. But this one is not, feel free to post your garbage here and - bonus - I can actually reply to you here without derailing unrelated discussions.

But of course we all know that you're not interested in replies or discussions. You're just looking for new venues to spread your BS and to "win" debates by declaring your opponents too stupid to understand your walls of text.

Kudos for making this post short. You're making progress. Keep it up and you'll be in top 200 soon.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: LoyceV on January 08, 2019, 06:53:55 PM
I'm creating self-moderated threads thanks to your incontinence. But this one is not, feel free to post your garbage here
I got sucked into another thread, but quickly deleted my reply there. This seems like the right place to post it again:

I got summoned in another cryptohunter thread. So let me add one thing: theymos just doubled my Merit Source amount. I can only assume that means theymos agrees with the posts (read again: "posts", not "users"!) I merit.
As for receiving Merit: feel free to do the math on my account: take away all Merit received from the Top 200 Merit Receivers, then take away all Merit received for posts in Meta. Then take away 50% more, just for the heck of it, and I'll still have more Merit than CH :D
Maybe the moral of this story is: stop complaining, and start contributing!


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: actmyname on January 08, 2019, 06:59:51 PM
Just chiming in real quick here:

Fact: The top 200 merit receivers are the ones with the most sMerit. (excluding some outlier merit sources)

Those with more sMerit to send will send more sMerit, generally. Hence you will see an uneven distribution of merit fans in the top 200.

For example, cryptohunter.

Just from the top 10 merit fans of your profile, four are in the top 200. Those four correspond to 20% of your earned merit.

Perhaps that's not a lot in your mind but here's the thing: you're rank 606 for most-merited. Isn't it conducive that because the top merit-holders have the most sMerit, then the more merit you receive, the more likely it is to come from the top 200?


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on January 08, 2019, 07:17:07 PM
Perhaps that's not a lot in your mind but here's the thing: you're rank 606 for most-merited. Isn't it conducive that because the top merit-holders have the most sMerit, then the more merit you receive, the more likely it is to come from the top 200?

There is also the fact that we have no control over who sends us merit. So conflating those two groups (receivers and senders) is kinda pointless. Let's say I want my merit score to be more diverse and earn more merits from altcoin shitposters. How exactly would I achieve that?


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: LoyceV on January 08, 2019, 07:36:49 PM
Let's say I want my merit score to be more diverse and earn more merits from altcoin shitposters. How exactly would I achieve that?
I expect the users at the bottom of this list (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5084723.msg49057482#msg49057482) to be able to tell you.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: mikeywith on January 08, 2019, 07:47:54 PM

so you went from long posts to long blue posts. not bad for a change.



Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on January 08, 2019, 10:55:20 PM

so you went from long posts to long blue posts. not bad for a change.



Thanks for noticing.

Try putting it in another colour it's really fun weeeeeeeeeeeeeee

read my post. Rebut the points you can cleary with evidence. Otherwise remain silent and don't offer more unsubstantiated irrelevant nonsense.



@actmyname

Would be better to chime back in on the thread in meta that addresses the same subject but in a place where it may be of some use to discuss it.

I am ready to discuss all the new explanations, excuses, unavoidable outcomes based on the broken mechanisms, time travel, lemons, anything people want in the most important thread of the year. Also in sensible straight forward simple and honest language.

Anyway this all boils back down to the central points we were discussing in the most important thread of the year in meta. I should have made my responses in blue but I did them italics. Next time blue to make it easier to spot.

I can't see the point of discussing this very same subject in 2 places at once. Come back to the most important thread of the year when you get some time.


@loyce the AI  (absolute imbecile)

same answer as before.

what makes me laugh about you (apart from how observably foolish you are)  is that you are obsessed with me. I mean you can't keep me on ignore you have to keep peeking at my posts and replying. Watch, I mean you have announced I am on ignore many times and yet you peek and will reply to me again shortly. Now I notice you have started to mention me in threads (i like that) You have no self control where the true legend cryptohunter is concerned do you?

Come let's be friends I can have you at my place if you like. You know those small round robot floor dusters that somehow go all around your floors and cleans them ... I have one of those somewhere. We will get you all set up and functioning on that. Plenty of redundancy for your future personal growth. You're gonna love it ... being where I am...and cleaning up all my mucky areas.


@suchy

Come ask your questions on meta in my most important thread of the year. Or should I copy and paste some of your questions there since you don't seem to dare to debate there any longer with me. That last post was a classic. I mean sorry about my mistake but that was a pure comedy gold that you provided.


Now let's all start over. I feel I got off on the wrong foot with some of you guys . Let's all head back to meta and discuss in an adult and measured way. I am ready to turn over a new leaf. I will no longer hit you guys with the truth mercilessly over and over until you are all bouncing off of one another flailing around screaming excuses and garbled nonsense.

 I promise I will just focus on the systems and how to improve them. You guys actually have been so open and obvious cycling merit and colluding to stop me highlighting issues and suggesting improvements it can almost be reasoned that you are being so net negative that you swung round to net positive again by forcing the systems overhauled because such fools holdin such high scores makes it as ridiculous as the notion of the  pharmacist  willingly removing his highly paid sig.

Ok new leaf can starts now btw. That was just the old me above.

All back to meta now and we all just be friends again. I don't think it is fair you should all be kicked out of your fav forum away from your ex fans. I start to feel bad now about providing some stats and some factual descriptions about how merit and trust operate and suggestions on how to make them more objective and fair.  Forgive me.




Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on January 08, 2019, 11:08:03 PM
@loyce the AI  (absolute imbecile)

WTF? Why is LoyceV an absolute imbecile and I'm only a total imbecile (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5093854)? I feel like you're discriminating against me due to my lower merit score. That's it, I'm trowing my toys out of this thread and not talking to you until you start calling me "legendary imbecile sir"1


1 or until you say something irresistibly stupid, whichever comes first.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on January 08, 2019, 11:26:11 PM
@loyce the AI  (absolute imbecile)

WTF? Why is LoyceV an absolute imbecile and I'm only a total imbecile (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5093854)? I feel like you're discriminating against me due to my lower merit score. That's it, I'm trowing my toys out of this thread and not talking to you until you start calling me "legendary imbecile sir"1


1 or until you say something irresistibly stupid, whichever comes first.

When I asked you why people called LoyceV  an AI all the time.

You told me that was the reason???

Now when I try to turn over a new leaf and make friends again ..you do me like this?

I knew I could not trust you.

That's it deals off.

Sorry loyce I was hoping suchmoon would play fair. He made a very convincing story with corroborating posts from your history and I felt his explanation was more than reasonable. Little did I know he was trying to drive a wedge between you and my floors.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: LoyceMobile on January 09, 2019, 07:25:14 AM
WTF? Why is LoyceV an absolute imbecile and I'm only a total imbecile (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5093854)? I feel like you're discriminating against me due to my lower merit score. That's it, I'm trowing my toys out of this thread and not talking to you until you start calling me "legendary imbecile sir"
That is strange indeed, cause although you have slightly less Merit, you're a much bigger circle jerk gang member who distributed much more Merit than I ever did!



And as for calling names when you're out of arguments: what are you, 12?


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on January 10, 2019, 07:54:46 PM
Brilliant logic (emphasis mine):

Lauda protected the dash captive instamine scam for years after it was proven. He is therefore  a confirmed scammer according this.
Now suchmoon protects suchmoon and therefore is a scammer.

You can't see how that works?

Lauda and suchmoon are scammers.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: Lauda on January 10, 2019, 07:57:13 PM
Brilliant logic (emphasis mine):

Lauda protected the dash captive instamine scam for years after it was proven. He is therefore  a confirmed scammer according this.
Now suchmoon protects suchmoon and therefore is a scammer.

You can't see how that works?

Lauda and suchmoon are scammers.
I thought were were alts ???


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on January 10, 2019, 08:22:02 PM
I thought were were alts ???

Even better - according to trollhunter it doesn't matter. Everyone's a scammer if they protect themselves.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: o_e_l_e_o on January 10, 2019, 08:54:46 PM
If I pre-emptively declare my own self-loathing, does that make me immune?


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on January 10, 2019, 09:16:23 PM
If I pre-emptively declare my own self-loathing, does that make me immune?

Ah, nice try, but don't worry, the criteria can be adjusted at will to accommodate anyone. I bet underscores in a username indicate some sort of depravity.


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: cryptohunter on January 10, 2019, 09:49:44 PM
Brilliant logic (emphasis mine):

Lauda protected the dash captive instamine scam for years after it was proven. He is therefore  a confirmed scammer according this.
Now suchmoon protects suchmoon and therefore is a scammer.

You can't see how that works?

Lauda and suchmoon are scammers.

Typical suchmoon tries to doge the point.

Here dumb ass replace the 2nd suchmoon with lauda. Sorry you could not work that out alone.

Seems just like you trying to change your definition.

I await this twisting and turning and excuses.... hahaha

I am pushing this definition of a scammer we both agree on very hard and I see no comeback.

I wonder all the pms going back and forth findng excuses and trying to get out what they have previously posted. lol


Title: Re: cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers
Post by: suchmoon on January 11, 2019, 02:17:56 PM
Now suchmoon protects suchmoon and therefore is a scammer.
Here dumb ass replace the 2nd suchmoon with lauda. Sorry you could not work that out alone.

Replace the first "suchmoon" with "cryptohunter" and "protects" with "hates" and it's finally starting to make sense.

Nobody can work out your verbal diarrhea if you're not even trying to sound coherent.