Social Engineering, maybe? So that they can attempt to hack accounts associated with the users now that they that the potential victims are into crypto.
I also see an unrelated instagram account, maybe the target could also be to get more followers from the stupid bounty bots. Imagine even after the warning, the bots are still posting their proof of authentications 

There's no better option than using that very exchange BisQ. Depending on how much you want to exchange, you might maybe face a challenge of low liquidity. The other option is robotsats if you completely don't want anything to do with KYC

I understand that Haveno (Decentralized exchange for Monero to fiat transactions) has been launched. I have not yet used the platform, so I don't know how good it is, but another way would to swap some of the BTC for monero and then use Haveno to trade it for Fiat.

Which time frame are you basing on? 6 hours, daily, or weekly?

On a daily, it seems close to what you stated. The previous bounce back in May was from the $56K region, forming some sort of support though it is yet to be tested again, let's also not forget the strong resistance that has formed in the $72k - 73K region since March this year. Going past it will require some very serious uptrend momentum.

I did face some lag earlier on, but it would eventually load.

I guess it's wise to make predication early enough to avoid that last minute disappointment. The challenge already has 91 participants. I guess I shall soon hit the 100 mark.

Meanwhile, the match day 2 games that end in draws have not been doing me good so far  

Clearly it's mostly about marketing and trying as much as possible to be innovative, for example of Binance.
When the service had launched, there were a lot of Bonus promotions, including juicy affiliate programs. The launch of BNB ICO and its success was also very crucial. Binance was the first crypto exchange to innovate most of the new exciting products and most of the other exchanges were just copy cats.

You will be shocked but so many people under look critical features such as security, KYC, support etc

They probably introduced themselves here around the time Bitcoin and the ICOs started marking headlines world over.

Maybe because money changing or exchange was also something popular on the Internet at the time. I just wonder if they first launched in Russian or just moved into the Russian market later. For some reason, there seem to be way so may exchangers originating from Russian vs the rest of the world.

The truth is, due to the ICO boom, there were so many signature campaigns both that would pay in Bitcoin and altcoins (ICOs) thus so many opportunities. This gave an opportunity for even Jr Members to participating ICO signature campaigns, which were also so well rewarding most of the time in that Bull run.

After that period, the ICO bounties became less lucrative and people switched to Bitcoin paying signature campaigns. There was an influx of high ranking users and with the few campaigns left, Most CMs resorted to accepting only Sr Member ranks and above. It's just about demand and supply and the service being advertised trying to get the best out of what they pay for advertising.

That information is freely available. I am not sure if you just missed, or you did not understand when you tried to read through, you can check this out if you haven't read anything yet about BIPs
1. https://bips.dev/
2. https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0001.mediawiki
3. https://bitcoinwiki.org/wiki/bitcoin-improvement-proposals

In other words, it's a portfolio manager of sorts?

I think using "DCA wallet" was a little confusing. That's why I thought one could purchase coins through it. I also saw an Option to buy some altcoin through it and s deposit address. I am not sure about the purpose of that. I think your services needs more documentations such as Help guides, FAQ etc

Once you use a limit order when buying or selling a certain trading pair, you become a market marker in that particular trading pair. So any trader can do that so long as the order size is above the minimum limit. Some exchanges have a minimum of 10 USDT, others have a minimum order size limit of 5 USDT. So it also depends on an exchange.

I doubt. You seem sad and miserable

I mean, look at all your previous loan requests (scam attempts). Why would you expect forum members to be polite to you? You are not a genuine new member but rather a potential scammer. In the real world, you could easily get mobbed.

Yeah, the two platforms, Duckdice and Tower.bet are linked so it makes sense of support stuff of duckdice also respond to issues raised about Tower.bet

I haven't submitted any review using the site yet, but If I understand well, I think they discourage people from including their personal detail in the review description area. Now, once someone proceeds by submitting the review, they will be asked to enter their phone number or email address to "curb" spam. Maybe that's what they meant based on stafstor's findings.

I just stumbled across another part of the website, and I think they are trying to do better - https://learn.robosats.com, which loads OK and has valuable information about Robosats. It seems they intentionally disabled it from loading in normal browsers. When you visit the same domain using Tor browser, you are automatically redirected to the official onion link.

I don't know what security you are talking about. I have seen "Decentralized" platforms get hacked. Those exchanges are not 100% decentralized. The sad truth is that when it comes to Perpetual trading. Liquidity and the speed of execution of an order are very important, which centralized exchanges perform in much better their counterparts.

You also forgot to talk about on chain fees which can prove to be so high as compared to the trading fees in Centralized exchanges especially with chains such as Ethereum

So how exactly do they fight spam or fake reviews?

It's a little confusing because somewhere else they say that

In this case which personal information are they referring to if not the phone number, email addresses or names?

If I read this reply rightly, the claim they paid up the initial deposit but on the other account


Maybe that was what @bobstone refereed to in his initial replies, or perhaps there was a mix-up as he admitted in one of his posts.

Away from the copy-paste-typo argument. The timeline of the last active of the old account, time of creation of the new account and the new post via the new account is something that can not be under looked. It appears as though OP logged into the other old account shortly before deciding to create a fresh accusation via the newly created account.

June 13, 2024, 11:17:22 PM Time of registration of New account (Yxuyovysis384)
June 13, 2024, 11:26:57 PM The time the old account as last online (drhouse99)
June 13, 2024, 11:56:49 PM The time this accusation was made

All this happened within 40 minutes. I believe in coincidences but this?

Maybe we will just have to wait for the investigation results from Duckdice, but there is probably more into this case.

I managed to reproduce the same issue when I tried to translate the whole page using Google Translate. Perhaps that's where the issue came up from, and it's not a bug related to the forum. When you disable Google Translate or refresh, everything goes back to normal

Positive! The site is now online, even the isitdownrightnow.com website confirms that it is reachable. It looks like it has some temporary interruptions from time to time. What I noticed during the blank page phases is that the results shown by the extension on the forum profile pages seemed still accurate or uninterrupted.