kaj je netko spomenul pivu?
|
|
|
Ispričavam se što upadam u temu od dea...luci...pardon...daniel91 na ovaj način, trebam jedan post ili temu koji je jako dobar da pošaljem 50 merita - znači prijevodi ne dolaze u obzir, samo nešto što ste sami napisali i da se nalazi na našem boardu, da sad sam ne tražim, jer imam podosta toga za čitati. Malo sam u zaostatku, jbg...
PS nebitno da li sam već poslao koji merit.
|
|
|
i am not commited to scams and didn't take a close look.
You never do...some people just don't deserve second chance...or third. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FSlMh65m.png&t=665&c=YacJKDKGfEaemg) Usually she shows up and tells us how it is inappropriate to flag the accounts that didn't scam anybody
I believe that is purpose of warning flag. Accounts shilling for scams no matter what? If you ask me, that is damn good reason to flag them.
|
|
|
E ovo je bas igra po mom ukusu, tako nesto i trazim u biti, a i stvarno dobro izgleda. Steta onda sto NFT itema vise nema a i sto je tako skupo da se opremi lika. Ali budem malo bacio oko i probao, bas da vidim.
Imaš ovdje popis BC itema https://lostrelics.io/items, sad gledam i vidim da su napravili nove iteme i oružja ali mislim da ih nisu još ubacili u samu igru. Ako se odlučiš igrati obavezno uzmi na marketplacu Power Pendant (možeš i sa njihove stranice kupiti za 66$, al čemu bacati novce ako možeš uzeti za in-game coine ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) )
|
|
|
Ali nema veze, mislim da cem kroz slijedecih godinu poceti dobivati dobiti postene igre sa NFT implementacijom, ono tip igara kakve se mogu naci na Steamu a ne ove browser based pizdarije.
Ima ona Age of Rust, trenutno je u testnoj fazi (ako netko želi isprobati: https://store.steampowered.com/app/1461520/Age_of_Rust) i izgleda obećavajuće, jedino što je hardwarski dosta zahtjevna. Inače sam naletio na jednu igricu, Lost Relics, igrao sam je tjedan dana dok nisam shvatio da gubim vrijeme tražeći blockchain iteme kojih jednostavno više ni nema, osim ako ih se ne kupi - a poprilično su skupi (za malo bolje oružje cijene se kreću valjda od 600-700$ pa nagore, a vidio sam da se nekakav luk prodaje za preko $100K). S druge strane nema baš neke logike ni kupovati jače oružje kad su šanse da se nešto nađe gotovo nikakve a onda se na kraju krajeva igrica svodi na dosadno klikanje jedne te iste mape i trčanje po njoj. Šteta, jer igrica stvarno ima dosta potencijala.
|
|
|
@OP check ethereum addresses, for example this one https://etherscan.io/address/0xc81cd59ffa6001242aa05daaa11cc2a9a5ca4d1e#tokentxns received tokens from accounts: 0xc4eB8B2Dc88C0Aff771331c929a6B21acBb49aD5
ETH Adress: 0xD511B3e3751008eCca9b9cdB2488bc39b70D7441
Ethereum Address: 0xc4eB8B2Dc88C0Aff771331c929a6B21acBb49aD5 ETH Adress: 0x5F5A0E043C484146D99187816779CCfE717AeFC9
0x254E9475169B5b1681e0E282476a764CfEe303C9 Connection between accounts republicrypto, arjuna BTC and jawatulen ( https://etherscan.io/address/0x1f62cfb43f59ae7d6c79278ac12fbfffdb4ef622#tokentxns): ETH Adress: 0x5F5A0E043C484146D99187816779CCfE717AeFC9
ETH Address: 0xA1C4A2972887Ca17a30468d40607E48c325F447a 0x597790c2Df263219d02b6ABB8077390393b871E5
...you should probably go trough all addresses and you might find more accounts.
Edited, quotes are redacted.
|
|
|
Čitam da je Jack Dorsey prodao svoj prvi tweet kao NFT i zaradio 3 milijuna dolara. Meni iskreno nema logike da netko da toliko novaca za "evo baš si namještam twitter" NFT a da ne pričam o po meni hrpi gluposti za koje ljudi daju masne pare, evo recimo ovakve stvari smo doslovno crtali po klupama u srednjoj i dobijali jedinice iz vladanja zbog toga a sad netko takvo nešto nacrta, napravi NFT i najednom to vrijedi $1.65M: Izvor: https://news.artnet.com/market/most-expensive-nfts-1952597
|
|
|
It is counter to negative feedback sent for trolling/spamming/I-don't-like-you/someone-said-to-tag-you-I-really-have-no-idea-what-you-did/you are newbie account who knows too much/Insert-any-other-not-related-trust-reason. Using positive counter-feedbacks is a completely inappropriate use of the trust system and from my perspective it has no justification at all because if anything a neutral rating can suffice.
Don't send inappropriate ratings and users won't have anything to counter, problem solved. Don't act like problem lies in my counter feedback, problem is your negative trust.
You know, JollyGood, it is not cool what you did here, especially because of the fact that you have never ever complained when negative feedback was countered on your profile and some other things I won't mention ![Angry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/angry.gif) marlboroza over and out. PSPlease remove this ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FI1Hp1s2.png&t=665&c=feYDfxjglWRySw) It insults me.
|
|
|
Is adding counter feedback and giving positive trust to someone an appropriate use of the trust system?
Before new system, counter feedback was used to remove red warning message for accounts which were tagged. It can serve to show trust senders that their negative trust is inappropriate and they should remove it (for example, lauda-eddie13 fight IIRC over some words, lauda tagged eddie, 2 users countered feedback then lauda tagged eddie again and feedback was countered again, then lauda decided it is best to remove negative feedback). @marlboroza: since all negative feedback on OP has been removed, you should probably remove your positive feedback too.
Already done. OP can lock this topic.
|
|
|
I'm not the one trying to bring down an established cheater buster [...] by slinging some shit about an outstanding loan that affects nobody in any capacity.
Trying to bring someone down by raising question about loan status because account become inactive and asking him to sign message because account changed password, got it. Not to mention that "active loan" neutral feedback showing information of not repaying loan on time. Yeah, that definitely deserve negative feedback. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
On side note, nutildah can you lend me 4000$ I promise I will return you 4400$ in 20 days? ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
~
I think you are missing my point here. Never mind. Send me PM when (if) you and JG remove negative ratings. I think issuing a positive counter-trust to such an account is an over-reaction; perhaps worse than Yoshie's neg tag on a throwaway account.
Doh! It's not. It is counter-feedback to emotional negative feedbacks, as soon as they remove tags I will remove counter as well. This Fact Finder account was created purely to stir shit. If they had honest intentions they would have just posted from their main account. ~ This person was likely issued a red trust by Yoshie on another account and now they are trying to get revenge. It's a blind stab at retribution that is totally tactless given Yoshie's situation.
What's difference between Fact Finder speculating about Yoshie and you speculating about Fact Finder being alt account of red trust user who is doing this for revenge? Does it mean that you will also get negative feedback? ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) If this kind of action occurs frequently on this forum, the forum will have nothing left to do.
If someone wants to accuse, he can create 1-5 accounts and then discard. This could happen for you and me, does that make sense.
IF? ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) Where have you been all this time?
|
|
|
You see this: I am getting partial repayment almost each month. And I am getting response when I am sending message, so there is no problem about the loan. Even I got partial repayment last month.
Yes, but you see, you asked for a loan in January and you said you will repay it in February, in February you said that you will repay remaining amount in March and in March you said that you will repay everything in April. And now, you are partially repaying something you supposed to repay a year ago. So if you ever take another loan and you say you will return it next month, lender can expect to see money next year, right? Because, as I said, it doesn't concern you in the slightest. Yoshie has an ongoing negotiation with shasan. If shasan isn't bothered with it, neither should you be.
Errrr...last time I checked someone open topic complaining about negative trust they received and I thought this is discussion forum so I replied. It's a bit rude and low to poke around dredging up drama about people's outstanding loans if they are not actively seeking new loans. So what? He's not perfect. Neither is anybody.
Aha, so it is OK to not repay loan on time as long as you don't seek new loan and tag users who asked few questions, right? ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) You're also saying this person is trustworthy by leaving them a positive trust.
It is not what I have said, nutildah...
|
|
|
Not a good question. That thread was created with the simple goal of shitsmearing. It's obviously an alt of somebody who was tagged by Yoshie for what could be a legitimate reason.
Someone didn't repay loan for more than a year. How is that not a good question? Actually, I am pretty damn sure that most people would like to know that info before someone ask them money, just to know what they can expect. Not your problem or concern in the slightest and not worth pontificating upon.
I know it's not, I only shared my opinion about people who don't repay loans on time, call it life experience. Perhaps you have different opinion about this and that's fine. I actually wasn't aware of this, but as I am now, I am very disappointed with yoshie. So you positive trusted an obvious troll account who is seeking revenge on somebody by bringing up an issue that has nothing to do with anything?
But it has something to do with money, so it is reputation and trust issue. Anyway, I countered ratings. When users decide to place neutral feedbacks for so called "trolling purposes" I will gladly remove it.
|
|
|
Misery loves company... I’m guessing a person’s personal happiness correlates strongly with the type of feedback they typically leave. Possibly also a feeling of helplessness in their own lives causes them to want an outlet for their frustration which tends to manifest itself in an abuse of any authority they may perceive themselves to have, in this case, leaving negative feedback in the DT network.
It is ok to do that as long as you don't include accounts to your trust network just because they left negative feedback to people you don't like ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
So YOSHIE has active loan for over a year now, he went offline for couple of weeks, someone raised good question - and got tagged because they are...newbie account recognized as troll ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) That's just wow! I don't consider this correct use of the Trust system:
Me neither. Maybe it is just me, but when I lend someone money I expect to see that money on arranged date. Ok, maybe person who borrow money can't repay it on time, so I could go with extension, I mean, what the heck else I can do except to hope that I will see my money back? Nothing, really. So what does this "we communicate" exactly mean? Someone is telling you that they will return you your money then next month they are telling you "don't worry, I will return you your money" then next month they are telling you again "I will return you your money, don't worry" over and over again, until when? I've been there couple of times, don't trust such people with money! They will probably eventually return you money, but the time you have to wait for it...uhhh. And really, things which Fact Finer said and Timelord2067 offering money to YOSHIE to repay part of loan: Today's Timelord2067 way of showing me support that he agrees with my previous speculation about YOSHIE not being able to repay the loan is correct. I've got ~ETH 0.21 which I don't mind sending your way to help payback the loan to shasan if that helps keep the Trolls off of your back. The main thing is that you rest up and recover from your ordeal.
You've earned a break from this place for a while - see you when you get back.
...does it mean Timelord2067 is trying to help YOSHIE because he knows YOSHIE can't repay loan, I mean, if YOSHIE can repay loan then Timelord2067 wouldn't offer him help to repay loan.
My conclusion: I won't trust YOSHIE with money as he showed that he is incapable of returning it on time (errr...at the moment -he is not capable to return it), and, I will counter these negatives on OP's wall linking this post as referrence.
|
|
|
Znaš li kome će se dijeliti te gold karte?
Piše da prvih 1000 rankiranih igrača dobija po jednu: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FG61s2GA.png&t=665&c=mHLRnWoAjBxhZQ) Jel se to odnosi na ranked ili unranked?
Što je unranked? Gdje je to? Ja sam na ranked oko 500-tog mjesta na constructed i oko 700-tog na discovery.
|
|
|
Iskreno, mi ovdje vodimo neke ''teoretske'' rasprave ali što zapravo može porezna u ovom slučaju?
Može te pitati odakle ti pola bitcoina na walletu. Nemaju uvida u naše crypto wallete i dobit će samo one podatke koje smo im mi voljni dati. Što oni mogu zaključiti iz stotina i tisuća transakcija u nekom walletu? Zapravo ništa.
Si čuo kad za chain analysis? ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) Čak i bez toga ti mogu povezati neke transakcije. Ovdje nema instituta ''međunarodne pravne pomoći'' pa da se oni obrate nadležnim poreznim i državnim organima neke zemlje i pokušaju istražiti pravo podrijetlo vaših sredstava.
Imaju se oni kome obratiti, ne brini. Sami možete odabrati walet čiji ćete ispis transakcija podijeliti s njima (i to ako će uopće i tražiti) i koji eventualno možete dodatno opravdati s nekim drugim potvrdama (bankovne uplate, uplate/isplate s burze...) i to je to.
Zanima me što bi se dogodilo kad bi odlučio "podijeliti" 1 wallet sa poreznom i porezna te pita odakle je taj btc došao i što je sa preostale 3 adrese na koju je bitcoin otišao itd. Jednostavno, u ovom slučaju oni su nemoćni da bilo što istraže i ovise o vašim podacima, a teret dokazivanja bilo čega je na njima.
Rekao bih da je na tebi da dokažeš podrijetlo svog novca, ne na poreznoj.
|
|
|
Nije "neka priča", taj porez plaćaju priređivači igara kod isplate. Naravno, to se odnosi na priređivače koji imaju licencu za Hrvatsku, nisam baš siguran na koji način biste platili porez da vas isplati neki "strani" crypto-casino jer tako i tako ni ne smijete tamo igrat. Još budete i kaznu dobili.
|
|
|
Da li svaki put treba prijaviti donaciju poreznoj i platiti tih 4 % ili je tzv. ''porezni događaj'' samo kada netko prvi put odluči povući ta sredstva u fiat i položiti na svoj bankovni račun?
Naravno da treba, čim ti nešto sjedne imaš rok za platiti porez, što se tiče signature, prije bih rekao da se gleda kao zarada a ne kao donacija, znači da si trebao platiti onaj "full" porez čim su ti sjeli btc-i (svaki put kad su ti sjeli). Preračunaš u kune i platiš porez. Da li se porez na donacije također mora platiti ako su sredstva držana duže od 2 godine u walletu i to se može dokazati ispisom transakcija na walletu?
Taj porez si trebao platiti prije 2 godine. Svjestan sam da je ovo ''sivo područje'' i da nema jasnog mišljenja porezna pa me samo zanima tvoje osobno mišljenje, na temelju neke porezne prakse za slične slučajeve.
Kako nema? Zaradiš btc - platiš porez. Netko ti donira - platiš porez. Imaš kapitalnu dobit na kraju godine - platiš porez na kapitalnu dobit. Nakon 2 godine držanja u walletu - ne plaćaš više porez na KD.
|
|
|
|