Is there something wrong with your website right now? It seems unstable, it just loads and whenever I am already in the login form, nothing happens after clicking submit.
The server works properly so as the website and this might have been late but yesterday I had no issues accessing them so, with such difficulties it could be your ISP issue. Anyway, it's for sure back to normal on your end. I'm from the Philippines, maybe some server issue?
Btw, I have a question regarding KYC, do I need to undergo the KYC process as soon as start to bet or deposit? Please let me know what is your basis or trigger of undergoing to KYC
Most casinos like Blackjack.fun won't ask for KYC by the time you firstly deposit. They might just ask you if you have deposited and then you try to withdraw without doing anything on your account because that can be considered as money laundering on their end. But still, I don't know how they will address that but that's most likely what will happen if you do so. |
|
|
|
-snip-
Not true. Mostly (POKER) are quite complicated, and at least they are add the game right now and good things is based their own software. I give you funfact, stake already deploy the game on (STAKE.US) in a few months ago. Nice for them, I didn't know a lot of what they did and what they have been doing lately. -snip-
We talk about these, the reason why we don't talk to much because the complication about the system or at least game deploy are quite hard. IMO, they need to bough the software from some provider and cannot find out suitable one. If (EVOLUTION) games have these, sure they are gonna to deploy just take a look on stake did. Required them to build the game by their own. It could be one reason why it took them for so long before they've added one. Maybe it's been developed mainly for them so that it won't be developed the way that others have acquired it from the same provider. Some of the US users are confused too because poker was on their platform from the past year, but for the rest of the world this is totally new.
Yeah, that is because they have a different domain from different users in other regions. |
|
|
|
Surprisingly, I thought that they'll never add that. Looking at the current state of the forum about poker, there has been a point of it when there have been no talks to it.
I don't know about you but it was just a matter of time before they added it. I never thought that they are going to add that. also, this forum isn't the only platform they are advertising their casino, you need to remember that they are known globally so not having talks about poker here in the forum does not mean it is not being talked about on other forums/platforms.
I am talking about that there is not that much talk and discussions about poker anymore and not about stake. Surprisingly, I thought that they'll never add that. Looking at the current state of the forum about poker, there has been a point of it when there have been no talks to it.
This forum? You gotta be kidding This forum is a niche compared to the overall gambling market, heck I doubt that atleast 50% of the people in this gambling sub section actually gamble and we are talking about Stake here. There are tons of their loyal players that will jump onto it even if Ed throw a bone I was describing about the discussions about poker and not entirely stake. It's probably I did said something confusing about that. But now, we're starting to see its glory back so they're probably seeing the opportunity to be a leader of this game. Not at all, there are far more superior poker site and poker network out there sponsoring huge buy in ranging up to even $200k buy. Im not sure if Stake is going to join these existing poker network or not but we'll see Maybe soon, they're already big and they don't have any problem about advertising anymore. |
|
|
|
|
Surprisingly, I thought that they'll never add that. Looking at the current state of the forum about poker, there has been a point of it when there have been no talks to it.
But now, we're starting to see its glory back so they're probably seeing the opportunity to be a leader of this game.
Good luck on whoever gets the sit first for their free rolls.
|
|
|
|
Click on the link to no know.
You can simply make the link look like this by using the URL code. [url=https://www.google.com/search?client=ms-opera-mini-android&sca_esv=8ffd5b3fe64f0225&channel=new&q=Cryptocurrency+risks+for+banks+2021&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjdqoux45-GAxXrgf0HHc92BmwQ1QJ6BAgEEAY]Cryptocurrency risks for banks 2021[/url]
And it will show the link on this thread like this: Cryptocurrency risks for banks 2021 |
|
|
|
Compared to the other managers, they don't want such discussions on their signature threads. I understand these farewell posts and the bestchange campaign manager is just happy for that and appreciates all of the good words. Anyway, I hope that the thread will be locked soon as there have been bunch of farewells, goodbyes, good words and good luck from almost everybody.  |
|
|
|
I believe in terms of methodology to accumulate Bitcoin we can't really tell wether one using DCA will be more aggressive in accumulation than another using lump sum. DCA opens room to buy at every market situation but having a good stash of it depends on how each individual accumulate wether aggressively or conservatively.
You're right about that someone's accumulation doesn't really matter whether you'd be doing it on a lumpsum or through DCA. Whichever you prefer but the most important thing here is, you can apply both any time you wish to and you are saving BTC for yourself and not for everyone else. That is because you know what's waiting ahead when you get to hold BTC. Yeah we all need to hold for a long term and also view Bitcoin investment in long run but that doesn't certify wether anyone is gonna be successful. Some might take time to be in good profit or even reach maturity stage, so if you wanna be successful then accumulate more with a target and not allowing room for exhaustion.
Someone's definition of success is subjective. Those that have been holding for so long and yet, haven't sold yet can be classified as successful because they've bought at a very low price. Now, those that will purchase whether it's a lumpsum or through DCA, in the future, you'll also be considered by the new investors as successful because you've bought it earlier than them. So yes, it's very subjective. |
|
|
|
Dallas Mavericks is no doubt the favorite on this game 7. I agree to what you've said that if Luka don't play well, it's a domino effect to the entire team.
That seems to be where they're getting their strength and how they play well. But good thing for the team that there's Kyrie and he's known and no doubt a star as well.
That's why if the other don't play well, there's still the other one that will catch all of that bad shot to try and make things right.
It's actually only game six and yeah they are favorites pretty much because they are playing at home. I think these 2 teams match up real well against each other. If okc can squeeze out a win they likely will be favorites playing at home in the game 7. I'm hoping to see that. A 1 game win and in game between these 2 teams would be insane. Yeah, game 6 it was a typo error. The game was intense and I thought that this is going to be a record for Chet that with his first actual season playing with the team, he'd be able to get into the conference finals. To be honest, I like that last slam dunk alley hoop that he has made telling to everyone that the game hasn't ended yet. The last free throw was missed on a purpose and it was so close if ever the last ball handler was close to the OKC's ring, it was a flop against the Mavs. |
|
|
|
I still see Dallas as favourites, a lot of people are not happy with Luka during this playoffs period, but I think he is doing fine (with a 30 point triple double he shut the doubters up) but it is still his team meaning that if he plays well then they will probably win, and all depends on what he will do this game too.
OKC is a good "team", like they have SGA but they have a good team around him, whereas Luka is a star that team is built around, so it all depends on how he plays, sure others help but if Luka doesn't play well, others can't help getting a win because of the strategy they have, if SGA plays badly, they do not emphasize him alone, they can just play with others. That matters a lot, and I think what will happen all depends on how Luka ends up playing tonight for sure.
Dallas Mavericks is no doubt the favorite on this game 7. I agree to what you've said that if Luka don't play well, it's a domino effect to the entire team. That seems to be where they're getting their strength and how they play well. But good thing for the team that there's Kyrie and he's known and no doubt a star as well. That's why if the other don't play well, there's still the other one that will catch all of that bad shot to try and make things right. |
|
|
|
|
If you are a parent and you have kids looking up to you, it's best to hide your gambling addiction and activities because whatever they see from their parents will reflect on them and give them that idea it's fine to do it because their parents are doing it.
A role model won't do that or don't even gamble at all if you want your kids to be the same as you and they'll grow up properly.
But as a parent, you know what's best for them and you have to be prepared with how you take care of them because no one knows the surroundings and influence that they will be with when they grow up to the right age.
|
|
|
|
[...]
Cavs did enough for me to lose my -10.5 bet on Celtics last time so I'm going to pick Cavs +15.5 @1.96 this time hehe.
Good luck, the ball is definitely balanced and round and no one will know until the game ends. All I really care is winning the bet to be honest hehe. The first half is over and the Cavs are still holding on despite the absence of several key players. Garland is expected to carry this team again but Marcus Morris is playing surprisingly well. I'll be happy if they can keep the score close to the Celtics in the second half too. And that bet was a loss, that's okay. I am also like that even though I know that these odds would mean nothing when the favored team wins. I'd say that it's still a good match and Cleveland had made it this far again. I'm a knicks fan so I definitely don't want to see a game 7 there but for both series in the west I'm hoping for a seven game series. Starts tonight with the wolves at home needing a win. Ant has to have a huge game for them. Will see what the young kid is made of tonight. It's amazing he is only 22 and has pretty much taken the NBA over. Once he gets to 25/26 years old the dude is going to be unstoppable. It's possible that this game 6 will be the welcoming victory of the Knicks and they'd be the second team to get into the conference finals. Speaking of the game of the Wolves, that was an interesting clutch there. If they're going to show the same performance as what they did to Nuggets, they're unstoppable through that kind of rotation. |
|
|
|
I get the most excitement when I have something at stake and when it comes to fun for me it works for me that way than just watching the match without having anything at stake, gambling for some people is all about the money and they have nothing to do with any other fun asides the money their gain from football bets.
Gambling is certainly all about money. We do these bets not because we're die-hard fans but it's actually what we want to have and for us to get some profits decently with our favorite teams that are about to play. So, it's the same football and basketball. We as fans will watch them even without bets but it's more fun if we're going to do that in accordance of some bets. |
|
|
|
|
The first thing that made me look is with your neutral trust that you're rigging or editing your bet slips and are for the fake fix matches. But if this happens to be there, I'd wish you good luck with this $1M bet.
I have no balls in doing this and probably that will be my lifetime savings that I'll never touch to do any crazy stuff. I'll take a pinch of it to bet but won't do such as an all-in.
So, if you prove us wrong you can do this and you've got some suggestions already. I want you to win with this bet that you're about to do.
|
|
|
|
[...]
Cavs did enough for me to lose my -10.5 bet on Celtics last time so I'm going to pick Cavs +15.5 @1.96 this time hehe.
Good luck, the ball is definitely balanced and round and no one will know until the game ends. All I really care is winning the bet to be honest hehe. The first half is over and the Cavs are still holding on despite the absence of several key players. Garland is expected to carry this team again but Marcus Morris is playing surprisingly well. I'll be happy if they can keep the score close to the Celtics in the second half too. And that bet was a loss, that's okay. I am also like that even though I know that these odds would mean nothing when the favored team wins. I'd say that it's still a good match and Cleveland had made it this far again. Dallas with this win put a feet in the final of conference but still a way to go, is not a easy team to beat Oklahoma, and i dont think they are gonna give up right now.
Props to OKC, they're still breathing. We'd see if the game 6 will be final for them or will take a revenge win. |
|
|
|
Do any of you think the Cavs will have their last hurrah in game 5? Injury reports says that Mitchell is likely to miss this game again but I doubt he will pass the chance to play even if he is 80% fit. I think the Celtics will still wrap up the series later. Those extra days for rest and preparation in the conference Finals are important.
The majority is thinking that's going to be their last game. It's gonna be Celtics which will get in first than the others. The bookies clearly agree to this with Celtics winning @1.05. Cavs did enough for me to lose my -10.5 bet on Celtics last time so I'm going to pick Cavs +15.5 @1.96 this time hehe. Good luck, the ball is definitely balanced and round and no one will know until the game ends. And with the other match, Nuggets and Timberwolves. Many were counting on the Timberwolves to win against the Nuggets and thought that they're the team that's going to stop them. But being 3-2 and having 3 straight wins against them, okay, we move back to our boi Denver Nuggets.  It's looking like a reverse sweep. Jokic already figured out how to deal with the soft and slow Gobert. Defensive man of the years versus the MVP, Jokic is really a genius on this one. We all thought that they'd be the rival that can easily take the Nuggets down but no. |
|
|
|
Do any of you think the Cavs will have their last hurrah in game 5? Injury reports says that Mitchell is likely to miss this game again but I doubt he will pass the chance to play even if he is 80% fit. I think the Celtics will still wrap up the series later. Those extra days for rest and preparation in the conference Finals are important.
The majority is thinking that's going to be their last game. It's gonna be Celtics which will get in first than the others. And with the other match, Nuggets and Timberwolves. Many were counting on the Timberwolves to win against the Nuggets and thought that they're the team that's going to stop them. But being 3-2 and having 3 straight wins against them, okay, we move back to our boi Denver Nuggets. |
|
|
|
What's your opinion about this please?
let me guess, the guy is also religious? it is great that he found a way to stop his gambling through his beliefs but the guy is full of BS, I suggest ignoring it. religious people have claimed a lot of things to be satanic For sure if he does, he prayed for his bets to win which is kind of odd for someone who's religious. But hey, we do get this a lot nowadays, right? I still remember my religious grandma saying that coloring my hair is satanic and I am being influenced by demons through the music I was listening to.
This made my day and you made me laugh. There's something odd to these extremely religious but look at them, you'd see something wrong with them that they don't notice. I am happy to see religious people and doing their faith but they should be limited to do that for themselves and not to meddle with others. |
|
|
|
There could be real match fixing but this is gonna be exclusive to the actual big gamblers. Like can lose a million or half in a single bet.
But for the average Joes out there, I don't think that someone is going to tell that legitimately and has got that deep connection in the dark world of sportsbetting.
yeah maybe for those who can afford to pay millions of dollars just to be part of the fixing game groups because we are not talking small amount here instead millions or even billions if how much is the involved money in each matches so this also means a Impossible for OP to find one unless he can prove that being capable of that million dollar group. He might have that in circle but it's not going to be him who's got the real connection into that world of match fixing. And if someone who's into it, he won't go into detail whether it's a public or private forum, they would just shut their mouths and won't tell anything about it. |
|
|
|
@OP if there are people that tells you that they know where you can join a group, don't believe them.
-snip-
I have not visited the website he linked in the OP, but I think that the rest of us should also follow your advice,?just in case the OP is not sincere about his question and only wants to advertise an scam himself. Fixes events are real, unfortunately (but not common, I hope), although I don't think that this info is available for the everyday Joe, and I would distrust anyone claiming the contrary because why would anyone share that info, instead of simply use it? There could be real match fixing but this is gonna be exclusive to the actual big gamblers. Like can lose a million or half in a single bet. But for the average Joes out there, I don't think that someone is going to tell that legitimately and has got that deep connection in the dark world of sportsbetting. |
|
|
|
Depends on what's a teenager because this can be an 12 year old, or a 17 year old. While I feel like kids below 16 shouldn't be allowed in, most countries will allow 17 year olds in when they look old enough. It's a bit like situation with cigarettes. Smoking is discouraged but in most countries teenagers can buy smokes with no restrictions, unless they really look young, in such case the shop owner may decide to ask them for ID, but I remember that when we were young we'd choose the biggest and oldest looking guy from our group to buy stuff for us.
17 is acceptable for most of the countries and cultures that they are starting to think and act like a young adult. There's always these cases where teens are able to avoid these kinds of restrictions from what the adults can do. And it becomes an achievement for them if ever they bypass the doors of the physical casinos and they are allowed to gamble. There's that sense for them and that's why they treat it as a challenge for that simple thing until they gamble and develop that habit that they are having hard time to remove. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
