i am getting the same speed for UBIQ or Ethereum.
What is the best BAT settings to mine UBIQ?
Shouldn't it be faster since the dag file is smaller?
What is the current DAG file size?
im using claymore dual miner, in single mode.
-mode 1
On cards with more RAM the ethereum chain will still run at full speed. I have 3 GB cards, barely enough to run ethereum's dag. My rig is a holdover from the litecoin mining days, haha. So what is the normal speed for RX 480 8GB on UBIQ? I am getting 29mh on ETH. That sounds right for both UBIQ and ETH for your cards. But it may vary. Every card will act differently, generally. Though they will fall into a range. The 480's were the replacement card for the 7950, I believe. |
|
|
|
i am getting the same speed for UBIQ or Ethereum.
What is the best BAT settings to mine UBIQ?
Shouldn't it be faster since the dag file is smaller?
What is the current DAG file size?
im using claymore dual miner, in single mode.
-mode 1
On cards with more RAM the ethereum chain will still run at full speed. I have 3 GB cards, barely enough to run ethereum's dag. My rig is a holdover from the litecoin mining days, haha. |
|
|
|
Is there anything I can do to speed up network syncronization for the Windows desktop wallet?
My wallet says 108 weeks behind and it's syncing really slow.
At this rate it won't be synced up for a few more days.
This is Joe's poker face... Muh, Muh, Muh, Maaaah. |
|
|
|
Hello,
I'm new to mining coins, and maybe I could get answer from more experienced miners here.
I though that all Ethash type coins should have same hash rate from same hardware/software, but I get like 20 Mh/s for ethereum and up to 37 Mh/s for Ubiq.
Anyone knows do I have problem with my mining software/hardware or is it normal?
If you are reading the hashrate from the miningpool you are using, it might take some time until it's better regulated. I use Claymore miner and ubiqpool.io and they show the following stats: Claymore miner: ~24.5 Mh Ubiqpool (30m): 26.67 MH Ubiqpool (3h): 24.39 MH So it probably needs a little time to correctly read the hashrate. I had the same 24,5 Mh with Ethereum. Thanks for the answer. I was telling Claymore miners stats. Thats why I'm confused. About pools stats I uderstand that. But now, tested with claymore, getting: 20.0 Mh for ETH, 33.7 Mh for EXP, 36.9 Mh for UBQ. Yesterday was the same stats. Wonder should they all differ so much... It has to do with the size of the DAG file. So, as the DAG file size increases you all mine slower? I decreases the amount of usable GPU memory for calculations. I remember getting 2x the throughput on ethereum a year ago. |
|
|
|
Hello,
I'm new to mining coins, and maybe I could get answer from more experienced miners here.
I though that all Ethash type coins should have same hash rate from same hardware/software, but I get like 20 Mh/s for ethereum and up to 37 Mh/s for Ubiq.
Anyone knows do I have problem with my mining software/hardware or is it normal?
If you are reading the hashrate from the miningpool you are using, it might take some time until it's better regulated. I use Claymore miner and ubiqpool.io and they show the following stats: Claymore miner: ~24.5 Mh Ubiqpool (30m): 26.67 MH Ubiqpool (3h): 24.39 MH So it probably needs a little time to correctly read the hashrate. I had the same 24,5 Mh with Ethereum. Thanks for the answer. I was telling Claymore miners stats. Thats why I'm confused. About pools stats I uderstand that. But now, tested with claymore, getting: 20.0 Mh for ETH, 33.7 Mh for EXP, 36.9 Mh for UBQ. Yesterday was the same stats. Wonder should they all differ so much... It has to do with the size of the DAG file. |
|
|
|
Another possibility is, Solarcoin isn't linked to Bitcoin anymore, so its playing by its own rules. Vipgelsi is probably right on also, if someone is selling off, that can cause a dip. Not worried in the least however. There's a bright future for Solarcoin. Anyone who takes a moment to look into it will see the potential. I will admit it's a little rough around the edges, but it's a rough diamond, not a lump of coal.
About SLR "not linked" to BTC anymore - I agree here - if we look at the price in SLR / BTC ratio, since ~may 2016 we are going "down" ~ 400% and I'm not happy about it, but if we look at that price in USD / SLR - we are going up and the growth may be slow but it is steady so I hope it will continue that way and it is for the best. Anyway every time I see some big wallet dump his stash at Bittrex I get mad, but overall we need distribution so in the long run I guess it is good if we get rid of the big whales - and speaking about big wallets I saw this one https://chainz.cryptoid.info/slr/address.dws?258872.htm and I was confused - when he popped up there  I didn't saw him last time I checked that rich list, but that amount of coin in the hands of one person is disturbing, especially to the new comers/investors. Anyway I think overall we will see a major increase in the price later this year with all of the stuff that is going on behind the curtains of the project - once we polish that rough diamond it will shine for sure  I think that might be Lykke's wallet. It in fact is. |
|
|
|
Entering ethereum alliance was the worst thing this coin could do, at least use etc over eth. Markets are not appreciating because they don't like this decision not only because of accumulation looking uncertain in the charts. It's holding, but I think revisiting your decision and using etc over eth or even using only the smart contracts code you need and not ethereum network would be best.
Solarcoin is agnostic. If the Ethereum alliance doesn't serve Solarcoin's mission, it'll be reevaluated. |
|
|
|
Isn't that what Trump is about though? Letting the private sector work its magic? |
|
|
|
I like what I was reading about SolarCoin but some things just put me off.
First of all, SolarCoin's website. The website is essentially the portal to their product and it looks like it was made by a 10 year old Indian kid called Pajeet using wix.com. Secondly, the visuals presented on their website look like they were made by 9 year old aspiring GFX artist who has just discovered MS Paint. Furthermore, spelling errors in the first paragraph in their f'in SolarCoin PDF summary posted on their website, what is up with that!?
Promising high-end technological innovation and their website looks like complete dogpoo, I am confused.
Would you rather a slick website and nothing but an ICO with no real product to offer? |
|
|
|
Someone is trying to dump about 300k slr or maybe he is just trying a fake out to scare people to sell. Why is it down in a cryptocurrency bullmarket?
this might be him soon. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPZn4rbiB8gNow I have to watch that movie again. Another possibility is, Solarcoin isn't linked to Bitcoin anymore, so its playing by its own rules. Vipgelsi is probably right on also, if someone is selling off, that can cause a dip. Not worried in the least however. There's a bright future for Solarcoin. Anyone who takes a moment to look into it will see the potential. I will admit it's a little rough around the edges, but it's a rough diamond, not a lump of coal. |
|
|
|
|
I'd rather not Solarcoin join a pump bubble.
|
|
|
|
|
A few months ago Poloniex indicated no interest in adding Solarcoin to their platform. I don't know.
|
|
|
|
Why is solarcoin not listed on poloniex?
Around 1 year ago there was a rumor that Solarcoin will be added to Poloniex and the Solarcoin Foundation added the Poloniex logo at their site. The price started to increase rapidly reaching ~ 0.25$ per coin ( 0.0004 BTC per coin). We were thinking that once Poloniex add us the price will go up arround 0.50$ to 1$ per coin... All was going well until Poloniex tweeted that they don't have plans to add Solarcoin and asked their logo to be removed from the Solarcoin.org site. It was a big misunderstanding caused by someone from the Solarcoin Foundation and since then Poloniex "bad" opinion of Solarcoin has not changed - the price went down very quickly and is still "recovering". So far we don't know what exactly was the cause of the misunderstanding and why that happened, but the one thing that we know is Poloniex don't want to add us... That is weird. Solarcoin is such a great coin, can't understand why trading volume is so low. Thank you for the detailed answer though. Trading volume is so low because noone knows about SLR yet. Its super undervalued. You can still be in the top 500 holders with a few 100$'s. But ssshhhhh. I still need to fill my bags  This is because no one owns slr. It will cost u thousands of bucks and huge headache to install solar batteries on the roof of ur house or wherever u want, and u need to provide a monthly energy consumption report to SLR if u wanna receive a lil portion of solars through bullshit solar proof-of-stake which is how slr is meant to be generated. Will anyone ever try to do that? Nope. It's an added incentive for those who already have, or are planning to install solar for their homes. Or for industrial scale solar farms. There are gigawatts of solar energy already on and off the grid. That's who should claim solarcoins, and share their irradiance data on the blockchain for scientific and practical use. That's why Solarcoin. |
|
|
|
Why is solarcoin not listed on poloniex?
Only the shadow knows. |
|
|
|
I'm curious about your thoughts on how to balance wallet staking with security. While on the one hand, it seems advantageous to stake your entire wallet, but on the other hand, cold storage is the most secure way to protect against hackers. How risky is it for the larger wallet holders (esp. those over 100k in SLR) to be continually active staking all their coins? This might not be a large concern right now with a market cap of under $4 million, but as the value of SLR rises, then it might make more sense to choose security over staking. Thoughts?
The idea now is to get an army of IoT computers staking grant rewards. The wallets may only have a few coins, but with enough of them on the network, it'll sustain transaction verification. |
|
|
|
Solarcoin shorts One of my favorite films of all time. Looking good Billy Ray. Feeling good Lewis! |
|
|
|
Your staking does not work.
I have upgraded to version 2.1.8.
The wallet projects "Expected time to earn interest: 2 hours",
but after 2 or 3 days ... still nothing.
Thanks 8JaJ5FW6LkvpPw439u6e69Pe85mcMGtBL4
Works for me. The stake time expectation is not accurate. Depending on number of coins held, and duration between initial deposit and first stake can vary. |
|
|
|
It could be closer than u think. Tomorrow Im launching gamma-version of solar which includes around 300 minor fixes and all improvements introduced with beta and alpha releases but I wont let u to download or use that shit coz I dislike u. There should be another way to build finished and fully operational solar network without resorting to hiring schoolboys and noobs like u who have no experience in building crypto.
Get lose, you can't compare with my powers. |
|
|
|
Hi all, looking for some help with my Raspberry Pi nodes; they only run solarcoind daemon not SolarCoin-Qt, is therea way to load the bootstrap of the blockchain?
I tried unzipping bootstrap.zip into .solarcoin directory but that didnt work. I set the solarcoin.conf with server=1 and daemon=1 as well. I tried starting solarcoind -rescan and solarcoind -loadblock=/home/pi/.solarcoin/bootstrap/blk0001.dat
Any ideas? Im making a new Raspberry Pi node for a friend and syncing the block-chain takes days.
You might have better luck taking your question to the slack channel.
https://solarcoin-group.slack.com/x-33423960289-36618089767/
Thanks I had asked on Telegram and Slack a few months ago, I realised I had not checked in with this forum though so thought it was worth asking. If anyone wants to build a Raspberry Pi node, the instructions are on: https://github.com/Scalextrix/SolarCoin-Raspberry-Pi-NodeThis is exactly what I was looking for! Great work! Thank you for taking the time to make this Cool, lets run SolarCoin on low power! We may have someone trying on a Pi Zero soon, will update if it works. This is def. the way to go. Although my intel PC stick has been doing a great Job! Im going to setup the raspberry Pi node as soon as I find the time. Does the raspberry pi Zero use even less power than the normal PI? Possibly, but its not really the power draw that is the driving factor for that, a Pi 3 is $50 (plus extras) Pi Zero is $5. If you are doing an ROI as a calimant of SolarCoin, and we can get you a $5 device to standalone run the blockchain, I think that will be a cool idea. Of course this also is good for the ElectriCChain project because we can use the Pi as a datalogger that can be on 24/7 monitoring production and posting to block-chain. Could look at it as a different business model also. Say you have a 50 dollar unit running the wallet with as many coins as you wish merely for investment purposes. There's no bad reason to invest in solar, but what if you're not ready to install panels on your roof, in your yard, etc? Well simply by investing in the technology you can be part of the rewards through staking. That's where I am right now. I don't have the resources to actually install panels, but the network needs nodes and the more nodes the better. The 5 dollar pi for data logging and nodes are still a great idea, but they won't appeal until the technology matures, unless you have a large enough SLR claim to make it worthwhile. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
