Manchester City will be the favorite team while Manchester United is not the favorite team to win the Manchester derby. The odds for Manchester City will be smaller than the odds for Manchester United.
If it's like this, the draw option will be the option to bet because it is to maintain the opportunity if Manchester City fails to win.
Manchester United lost against Fulham in front of their own fans (Old Trafford) and Manchester City won against Bournemouth with a narrow score at the Vitality Stadium as an away match.
A comparison of the results of the two shows that Manchester City's chances of winning are greater. In terms of performance this season, Manchester United cannot be superior.
Your thinking is very logic and is the same as mine but I want to express one more thinking. Manchester City already got a good win from a first leg in Champions League against Copenhagen so they will not mind too much about the second leg. This will give them more time to think of a Manchester derby match against Manchester United and this will reduce chance for Manchester United in that match. Even a draw looks to be out of reach for Manchester United if Manchester City won't suddenly underperform. The odds will be favorite on Manchester City as a winner and if any person is a fan of Manchester United, if he wants to bet, bet a draw is best option. |
|
|
|
Did you missout on the last event?, not this one its Man City vs Man United!! 👑 CoinRoyale.com | Man City vs Man United ⚽ 03 March (FreeBet 1mBTC). Predict the minute of the First Goal Scored! ➥ The closest prediction for the first goal scored will receive a FREE BET of 1mBTC! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5486418.0Good luck participants! This Manchester Derby match will be very exciting because both Manchester teams need to win it. Manchester City are still in a tight competition with Liverpool and Arsenal. They have good results recently but will start their hard matches in coming weeks, starting with Manchester United. These tough matches will decide Manchester City continue to race with Liverpool and Arsenal or will be left behind. Manchester United with a shock defeat by Fullham, temporarily have 8 points less than Aston Villa at the fourth position and they are even under Tottenham Hotspur. They will need to beat Manchester City to maintain their small chance and hope to beat both Aston Villa and Tottenham Hotspur to join top four. |
|
|
|
This is true. Even though the intention is to correct someone because of what they did is wrong or a mistake but still they feel that they are attacked when the truth is that the person who give the correction is not attacking at all but to help. What I can say about them is that if they don't like being attacked which is not the intention of the person who is doing it then they shouldn't be in this forum and should find another forum.
It depends on words and tone used to express education effort. Some people can use harsh words that make newbies feel uncomfortable and it's not good, not friendly. However newbies must admit what they did wrong, see positive things from contributions of other members and grow up thicker skin. Some posters can have great skills and use soft words that can be more favorite by newbies. If their intention is good, newbies must see it and move on, improve themselves. Reporting newbies is not wrong if the newbie have done something wrong like plagiarism and being a scammer.
Reports can be done privately to admins and moderators. Use the report button. [Unofficial guide] Report effectively. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin past cycle has proven that it can be predicted and as for those who are good at chart reading we are already seeing history repeating itself once again
You rely on history by this strategy for price prediction so let's know that history can be changed. New market cycles can be similar like past cycles but can be very different and only time can tell us about that. Understanding about history and make our plans for entries, exits with it is good but with a very big and important condition, we must not use all money to bet on that plan. I mean we must have money for our real life that is important and vital when history is broken and our prediction turns to be incorrect. If we don't have plan B, don't have an ace under sleeves, we will have big problems when things are opposite to what we expect. |
|
|
|
Join the $150 Bitcointalk Price Prediction Contest - Round 10!Hurry up! Participate in our exciting Bitcointalk Price Prediction Contest. Don't miss out on your chance to win a share of $150 in BTC. Make your prediction by clicking here now before it's too late! Time flies fast and JacksClub already hosted 9 Bitcointalk Price Prediction Contests. Now it goes to a 10th contest! Could I ask about your criteria? Eligibility Criteria:- Only Members are eligible for rewards directly.
- If a newbie comes in the top 6, they need to have wagering of at least $1,000 on their JacksClub account. If not, the reward will go to the next qualified participant.
Do you think it is better to restrict the contest to Members and above only. So Newbies are automatically disqualified with their predictions and you don't have to waste time to check their prediction prices and touch a second rule. |
|
|
|
I think it is warming up for Halving. Or this could even be a temporary rise caused by the ETF approval.
Bitcoin market was warmed up and rose up a lot with news about potential approval for Bitcoin Spot ETF applications. After approvals, price was corrected and took about three weeks to soar again. It soars again because people see massive new capital from Bitcoin Spot ETFs and they speculate price will rise more. My current take is this. Bitcoin will not surpass All Time High before Halving. I do expect some sort of repetition of what happened every Halving in the past. Every body is expecting history to repeat so they will take action based on that and influence the repeat to happen again.
I bet so too. Because whales must clean up the market before a big bull run. If price simply rises more and more, non stop, it will be more expensive for whales to accumulate Bitcoin. It also results in more selling pressure that is harmful for their manipulation and profit taking price area and distribution phase. I bet on a big correction before a halving but I believe in a bright future for Bitcoin, not only in this bull run but also more years in future. |
|
|
|
|
Account sale is discouraged, not prohibited. It explains why the account was not banned.
Forum has trust and trust feedback to handle this. You can tag, DT member can tag the seller to warn people who want to buy any account as it is risky.
Losing money to the seller.
Bought account can be locked by security.
Purchased account can be negative tagged by forum DT members to make it useless.
|
|
|
|
With the bot, CoinRoyale users can claim faucet with 1 µBTC that can be used for wagering with sports. I don't see information about waiting time between two faucet claims. It seems the limit is one claim each day. You've redeemed your free bet for today. Please come again tomorrow!
 Are you referring to the Telegram bot on the webpage? I have Telegram for Windows installed on my laptop, and when I clicked the 'Launch Bot' button, it directly opened the app and worked as expected.
It works well and easily to use like many Telegram bots. There are only four main categories to choose for exploration but after that there will be more sub menus with CoinRoyale bot. |
|
|
|
Indeed. They became well known here because of their different marketing strategies (sig campaign, contests, games etc.) the reason why they became popular. Though they already lessen their promotions as well as their sig participants.
Many constructive factors for their success. They must build up good products (games) and partner with well-known game providers. They must have good marketing with things you mentioned (signature campaigns, bonus, promotion, contests, etc.) and loyalty programs to build up stronger connections between their business and users. They must be transparent, fair in processing users' withdrawal requests include money from won bets. Together, those factors help Roobet to build up a good business, good reputation and keep it sustainably running with time. |
|
|
|
They're integrating crypto in their system because it doesn't pose a threat to their very existence. Do you think banks and governments would embrace the revolution if it was truly-decentralized? I think not. While BTC is decentralized, it has a set of issues (scaling, volatility, etc) which prevents it from replacing Fiat currencies altogether. It will never become a threat to banks' very existence.
Because they know that fact and we as senior Bitcoin investors, users know about that fact too. Banks integrate crypto into their payment system because they know cryptocurrencies won't replace and kill fiat currencies. They know that by deploying integration, their banks will get more money flow, more income and have better balance sheets. Cryptocurrencies and banks will interact with each other, co-exist and benefit each other. At least, people will have a choice between centralized banking and decentralized finance. As long as we're able to get true financial freedom and privacy, nothing else matters. Who cares about banks, anyways?  I like to have choices and honestly I still use bank transfers. Not all of my fund transfers is processed through cryptocurrencies. Only newbies think that cryptocurrencies will completely replace and kill fiat currencies, banks some day in future. |
|
|
|
Unfortunately, I do not see these people anymore. I don't remember if I have seen any BSV or BCH supporters in this forum except a recently banned troll after posting in Leo's farewell thread. I guess that was the happiest moment for a lot of Bitcoiners. No matter what they say, they know that they are spreading lies. They only wake up when the market is positive. I haven't seen any of them in the last year.
If I am a newbie, don't understand about Bitcoin, I can be affected by those shit coin supporters but if I have experience and understand about Bitcoin, I won't be affected by those supporters and their words. Because I know what is Bitcoin, what are shit coins. I even don't waste my time to read any article, interview, post from those people because I can guess what they say and I am fully aware that they spread misleading information only. Actually, the percentage is bigger than this. If we check coinmarketcap, there are 2.2M+ cryptocurrencies at this moment. How many coins do you know? I don't think there are more than 200K Crypto's. The rest 2 million crypto's are dead.
I agree with you on the number. They updated that article recent weeks and we must compare information from different resources and even can do our homework from raw data. Another report on dead altcoins. Charting the Number of Failed Crypto Coins, by Year (2013-2022) |
|
|
|
It is and it's not gonna change it maybe there are a bunch of altcoins with their capability and so on but bitcoin would be a bitcoin, not an altcoin gonna dethrone it. The world knows crypto because the Bitcoin and it always become like that. BCH is a good altcoin back then and I hear they make another hard fork or split team while BSV is just too centralized I just wonder why people buy this coin. There are thousands of altcoins and hundreds of Bitcoin forks but they are not comparable in security and developments with Bitcoin. How many Bitcoin forks are there?Dead Coins: Over 50% of Cryptocurrencies Have Failed. I knew Bitcoin Cash used to make a lot of noise and in 2017, its price even was like half of Bitcoin price but I never consider it as a good altcoin. If I want to use altcoin blockchains for transactions and don't want to touch smart contract blockchains, I would like to choose Litecoin or Dogecoin for my on chain transactions. I don't use Bitcoin Cash blockchain. |
|
|
|
LN payments are the same as bitcoin unconfirmed transactions. (unsettled and can be replaced/lost/tricked, dropped)
Payments through Lightning Network is off-chain but before being able to use off-chain payment channel, people will have to make an on-chain transaction to open a Lightning Network channel. It is a big disadvantage for people will small bitcoin amount and are not afford to use on-chain transactions when fee rate is high and expensive. If they don't want to pay expensive on-chain transaction fee, just to open a Lightning Network channel, they will have to store their bitcoins on centralized platforms that support Lightning Network. However, this practice is risky and not recommendable. Reminder: do not keep your money in online accounts |
|
|
|
No, the FUN token are still trading on exchanges, but the price dropped about 2% in the last 7 days and almost 4% in the last month.
With trading volume last 24 hours is about $1.1M, it's good volume for the FUN token. Price is very attractive in my opinion after I zoomed out the chart. I saw price corrected about 40% or 50% from its latest peak and it potentially gives investors opportunity to x2 their capital if the token simply reclaims its latest peak. Look farther, by zooming out, I saw another better possibility to have x10 with the token because the highest price in 2021 is about 10 times from today price. https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/funtoken/Freebitco.in have been trying to regulate activities for a while now, so I do not know if this is a regulatory issue. (Trading platforms need to adhere to certain regulatory requirements)
What are their regulatory activities? Could you share what you know, please. |
|
|
|
Privacy is a something you must understand very well before going into decentralized investment because it has to do with online things which it can make you stay longer in your cryptocurrency investment when you make your details safe and secure, but if you don't make them safe and secure, there is no way you can stay long in that investment.
Privacy exists in our life, in online and offline and it is everywhere, not only in investment or decentralized investment. Your post shows that you misunderstood about privacy. You also confused about security and privacy that are different. Many people has exposed their details on some links they click on social media some years ago that make some strange things to begin to happen to their money because, they didn't observe very well before clicking that particular links that are traps of the scammers to have their way to some people privacy.
It depends on what they interacted in the past and what details they leaked to phishing sites. If it is a phishing site, when they log in their account on it, I am quite sure that their money on a real platform will be drained out by scammers very quickly. They will not wait like some years to steal money from victims. |
|
|
|
So I finally succeeded in creating an account that allows me to post after 2 attempts as, I feel unsuccessful with the registration as I saw something like an evil IP or something of that nature, coupled with other write ups in red ink captions.
It means you created two accounts. The first one was restricted to post by evil IP points. The second one is this one. Is it what you do? Does that mean I did something wrong on my previous attempts?
What did I do please and how do I avoid that?
Evil IP can be false positive too and when you is banned with evil IP, it does not mean you did something wrong by yourself. It can be other people who create accounts from that same IP address, but not you. Explanations Evil score visualizationAll Internet evil, mapped: evil score visualization 2I must say I’ve been a little skeptical on writing anything less I do something wrong and trigger another evil IP.
From now, you will have to only worry about ban if you break forum rules. Unofficial list of (official) Bitcointalk.org rules, guidelines, FAQNewbies - Read before posting |
|
|
|
From what I see in the article it is a cloud mining scheme that offered high returns, but did not really exist. A classic ponzi.
I see it is a very classic Ponzi scam. If a not well known scheme like these can scam $1.89B one understands why there are so many scam schemes in the cryptocurrency world.
Apart from that, in the news it does not say if they have returned part of the money to get those reduced sentences or are those imposed by the legislation for that type of crime, which I like.
I dislike how this was written. Scammers can use Ponzi scheme to scam naive people and they can use many tools which can be attached to their Ponzi projects, to scam. Cryptocurrencies are tools for those scammers but Bitcoin or cryptocurrencies are not scam by itself. Saying like cryptocurrency scam is like anti-cryptocurreny. They must write like "Cryptocurrency is used to scam in a Ponzi HyperFund". Same for Bitcoin like "Bitcoin is used for scam in a Ponzi project." |
|
|
|
Banks are not threatened by crypto payments because so few people actually pay with crypto and the total transaction volume is just a tiny drop compared to global fiat payments. But the competition in the field of investment is more likely to happen - if people would buy Bitcoin instead of opening bank deposits, that could force banks to act. The first thing banks could easily do is to disconnect all crypto exchanges from their system, and that would kill a large share of crypto market liquidity. If that would be not enough, they could start lobbying the government to impose more restrictions on crypto activities. But so far we have seen nothing like that happening on a large scale.
There are competitions among cryptocurrencies and traditional banks, fiat currencies but they need each other. Like Bitcoin need altcoins to have a cryptocurrency market. Altcoins need Bitcoin as a King, a leader of this market and if Bitcoin, the only decentralized cryptocurrency can be killed by government, altcoins will be in brink of massacre and massive deaths. People use bank transfers, credit cards, debit cards to purchase cryptocurrencies and it helps traditional banks to have more income. Traditional banks with acceptance on cryptocurrencies, will help cryptocurrencies to reach to more users. |
|
|
|
Part of the report. Sam Lee, 35, an Australian citizen residing in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, was charged in an indictment unsealed today for allegedly co-founding HyperFund, also known as HyperTech, HyperCapital, HyperVerse, and HyperNation. Rodney Burton, 54, of Miami, and Brenda Chunga, 43, of Severna Park, Maryland, were promotors of HyperFund.
I did not know any of HyperFund, HyperTech, HyperCapital, HyperVerse, HyperNation. I have never read about them on cryptocurrency websites like Cointelegraph, Coindesk, BitcoinMagazine and the likes. I have never read about them in Bitcointalk discussions before today. Chance for members in Bitcointalk are victims of those scams exist but not too big. If they were scammed and were actively in Bitcointalk, likely they already shared those scams here for warning and discussions. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
