Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 11:50:08 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 ... 93 »
101  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: IOTA on: June 01, 2016, 02:31:43 PM
Why do you delete my constructive, civil and intelligent posts? You break my heart with this hostile attitude.
102  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: June 01, 2016, 02:23:03 PM
I don't like this bollocks at https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/basic-concepts/the-numbers/

"Marty; your numbers are just incredible. Your number 17800 I thought would be elected. The Dow was above it and looked like it was preparing to take off. ... "

WTF? Why he needs this kind of nonsense with such hosanna from some random assholes? I have his private reports and I read his public blogs, but I can't remember he said anywhere anything about a DJIA 17.8K resistance. Anybody read anything from him about a DJIA 17.8K resistance?

In this particular instance even retail day traders like me could understand (i.e. without the input of Armstrong) and it was clear that the latest rally is a dead cat bounce. I probably even said in this blog that I expect DJIA is flattening out and pulling back. I have been almost as long on the market as Armstrong so by being on the market you learn to be calm and understand when the market is uncertain. Plus, all sane analysts like Caldaro and the rest say clearly that this is very much a bear market right now. So even my 4 years old grand daughter would started shorting from DJIA 18K 6 weeks ago and wouldn't fall for this latest bull trap. Why he needs such hosanna about fairly obvious numbers, when again, in fact he hasn't even said anything about the DJIA 17.8K resistance? (or I just completely missed that).

103  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: IOTA - Unmoderated thread on: June 01, 2016, 02:02:50 PM
but the problem is that if they do they will go to jailGrin

They will go to jail anyway. Luring out money from noobs, naives and idiots (pick the category which you fit in) is a crime and in the jurisdictions of the scammers is punished by jail sentence.
104  Economy / Reputation / Re: CIYAM calls for an end to the bulls__t! on: June 01, 2016, 01:43:09 PM

This is true.  CIYAM collected money to implement AT on NXT and then implemented it on Qora instead.  That isn't honest or fair behavior.  Besides that, he defends the Chinese communists.


That's why I said nobody is perfect. Nobody makes the right decisions all the times. CIYAM perhaps made bad decisions, but since he has been trying to act with moral and integrity and - unlike the NXT, IOTA, Supernet, LISK, Waves scammers who lure money out from the idiots - he does contribute to crypto. Cryptocurrency is a funny place. Historically, it was very easy to be on the wrong side or make bad decisions. For example, I wholeheartedly supported projects in 2013-2014, at the born of altcoins, which projects seemed honest and innovative initiatives. Since we understand that some of those projects are absolute bollocks and with full of fraudsters and criminals (VRC, Ethereum, etc). We learn from our own mistakes and try to do the right thing by continuing to support the socially important idea of decentralized currency. By now, in June 2016 we have a better understanding who is who and who does what in crypto. It is clear what is scam and what is an honest project. IMHO CIYAM is not in the group of scammers.



I know you think CfB was BCNext, but I don't believe it.  For one, BCNext was vehemently opposed to the Larimers' Bitshares scam and wrote numerous posts exposing it for the scam that it is.  CfB on the other hand defended them and wanted cooperation between the NXT and Bitshares communities.  Imo, there can be no cooperation with liars, cheaters, and thieves or those opposed to the original ideological movement.  BCNext isn't "supporting the WAVES scam".  BCNext hasn't posted since 2013.  If you read the original NXT thread started by BCNext, it gives the impression to me that BCNext was located in the United States, but this is just my supposition.  CfB seems like an "ok" guy except for the fact that I think he backstabbed those opposing the Larimers' scam, the original hardline NXTers, and his association with David Sonstebo.  If CfB thinks he can produce ternary processors, sell them at a profit, and create a cryptocurrency network on top of it that is one thing, but having David as the CEO trying to convince the naive that IOTA will take over the world and be able to compete with the likes of Intel and IBM is another.  David is extremely abrasive and an international communist.  These aren't good traits for a businessman to possess.  I'm all for small business, but IOTA doesn't stand a chance competing with these major hardware / software companies.  David is running IOTA into the ground anyway, and I'm sure nothing good will come out of it.  I think it was a big mistake on CfBs part to leave NXT to chase after this IOTA pipedream.

I think you have completely misunderstood me. I said CfB and BCNext. It implies, I think CfB and BCNext are different individuals. This autistic CfB troll with his mediocre development skills has nothing to do with BCNext, except he was a useful footsoldier at some point (it doesn't mean BCNext was a better developer, he is very average as well). I am 99% sure who BCNext is. With 99% certainty I know his name, his whereabouts - it is not US, France nor Russia (though he is ethnicity is Russian). He is still active and organizing one scams after another, even if he had put on hold his BCNext account a long time ago. Regardless his initial intentions - which was most likely honest - by now he is a law enforcement material, nothing more or less than a fraudster.

I agree with the rest about David and the IOTA scam. I said many times as well what you have pointed out quite correctly about why IOTA won't be able to compete with IBM, Intel, etc.
105  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: IOTA - Unmoderated thread on: May 31, 2016, 09:49:41 PM
So basically the devs want additional 5% of all iotas (minimum) to pay for their work in several future months. They collected over half a mil dollars but they spent them without even releasing a full gui. If they don't receive the required amount of iotas, they will leave and start the same thing with other people, more generous ones. Right?


Yeppp. That's what scammers do: deliver nothing and ask more money.

106  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: IOTA - Unmoderated thread on: May 31, 2016, 09:45:23 PM
Quote
in addition to this recognition as a true supporter of the project those who donate will be given a certain donation-amount-proportionate privilege in upcoming projects that involve the initiators of IOTA. ( No more details on this at the moment )

In Plain English, the IOTA scammers want to roll out more scams to lure more money out from the idiots.

The IOTA scammers couldn't produce a thing nor of course any of the promised business deal by using the latest round of $500k IOTA scam money, and therefore they need more money.

Now they promise new dividends from the initiators of IOTA. JINN has produced zero dividends (and of course zero usable technology). IOTA has produced zero dividends (and of course zero usable technology). The scammers from Belarus and Norway has to come up with new nonsenses to give new hope to the idiots.
 
107  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers on: May 31, 2016, 09:34:12 PM
because you aren't able to write a sentence without idiot, i reported you for a training course to the mods.

You really broke my heart that my accurate assessment about the participants (i.e. idiots, shills and sockpuppets) of this fucking LISK scam has been reported.
108  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: IOTA - Unmoderated thread on: May 31, 2016, 09:21:20 PM
...but the LISK scam requires my expert input.

Judging by the progress of your current project, you are not an expert, don't fool yourself, delusions won't help you to achieve your goals before Grim Reaper nocks your door...

what is his current project? I know the OP writer from Ethereum and gadgetcoin. is he involved with other projects?

This lowlife belarusian who hides in the shithole of Belarus can see only the asshole of Lukashenko, but not my projects. He can only know about the progress of my project if
a) my business & technology partners have violated our NDA
b) he learnt Chinese so he can discuss the project with my business & technology partners

None of those a/b points had happened so nothing to talk about.

109  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: IOTA - Unmoderated thread on: May 31, 2016, 09:15:31 PM
ok, thanks! I will ask the GDC devs if they can adopt to a different communication. would you accept if 2-3 people talking from GDC not only one? Would be rationality or gain for IOTA in a collaboration? if you think yes, IOTA is interested, I can ask the GDC developers to delegate a team not only one person.

Stop this nonsense! These two wankers can help nothing to GadgetNet.
110  Economy / Reputation / Re: CIYAM calls for an end to the bulls__t! on: May 31, 2016, 09:12:51 PM
The majority is trying to earn money out of thin air, hoping to become millionaires.
Some smart-ass that are playing the role of the great scientist, while they are making others paying them (and their hype).
And few people who are really doing great things while starving to death, begging for some pennies.


I don't know whose sockpuppet this account, but I have to endorse it. That three points are actually very true.

111  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: IOTA - Unmoderated thread on: May 31, 2016, 09:48:40 AM

Further, and once more, there is also a glaring contradiction in saying IOTA is only software for IOT and then asking to be paid in it and ONLY it.



That's when the genius business plan of masking a coin sale by calling it "software" start to create nothing but problems. The fraudsters are trying really-really hard to mask the scam by calling the coin a "software". At the same time they organize the exchange presence for the "software", barking on that the "software" has created more presale ROI than any coins so far  ... and of course asking the "donation" to be made in IOTA coin (i.e. software). So now they are asking 5% of IOTA token (i.e. software) to be donated back. WTF? When they need money the software is suddenly a coin, which 5% will be taken back by the scammers.

Now the scammers, their shills and sockpuppets blackmail the "investors" who bought into the scam that they will be leaving, because the development cost money. No shit .. the development cost money. When the $500K was collected and the P&D (i.e. product)  was promised it was clear as well that software development cost money.

So now David boy says, donate me back 5% of your IOTA token (i.e. software) what I sold you, because software development cost money. Hilarious. It's like Bill Gates would blackmail the MSFT shareholders that sorry, I have just realized software development cost money, so donate me back a piece (5%) of your fucking Windows 95 CD - what I sold you -  otherwise I deliver nothing.
112  Economy / Reputation / Re: CIYAM calls for an end to the bulls__t! on: May 31, 2016, 09:29:27 AM
CIYAM is a good man. [...]

I had to stop here. Do your due diligence first, select your allies afterwards.

CIYAM could recognize and understand JINN, IOTA, WAVES, LISK are blatant scams. (Of course you know that as well, but why you support these scams is another matter). The fact that CIYAM expresses his opinion openly about those scams implies a decent man and clear moral standpoint.

CIYAM is not perfect, who is perfect after all? But there is no doubt, while piece of shit belarusian scammers like this Sergey CfB or the master-wanker BCNext are cancer on crypto, CIYAM tries to do the right thing and contribute to crypto.

113  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: IOTA - Unmoderated thread on: May 31, 2016, 09:21:53 AM

And again this "volunteer work" stuff. You raised +/-$500,000 dollars 5 months ago. That is a burn rate of 100k a month or so if the funds are gone - quite high. I'm not sure in which planet getting half a million dollars is = to volunteer work.


In the planet of BCT scammers. Welcome to reality where you understand IOTA is a scam, organized by a psychologically unstable 28 years old young man who has zero experience in business and technology. Therefore, despite he had access to a handsome development fund, he couldn't deliver one single business deal in 6 months (except the agreement with the absolutely meaningless Hong Kong team which are the same class of losers as David is). He couldn't even roll out a pilot. You know why? Because a pilot would require to talk to development teams and IT departments. None of the bluechip IoT businesses has any interest in the nonsense of IOTA tokens. Now the psychologically unstable David thinks the solution is form an alliance from industry players by taking his delusion to the next level. (again, nobody is talking to him and taking him seriously so there won't be any alliance, against alliance of the few losers like the Hong Kong team + David + CfB)

As I explained in this thread many times, there is no IoT solution will be created by IOTA nor any prospect that any TOP100 bluechip IoT business will be interested in the JINN/IOTA fantasy. IOTA is a P&D scheme, luring money out from the idiots and consequently nothing but a law enforcement matter.

114  Economy / Reputation / Re: CIYAM calls for an end to the bulls__t! on: May 31, 2016, 09:00:36 AM
CIYAM is a good man. He had enough from these NXT scammers. It's really hurt crypto what the NXT scammers do by rolling out one ICO after another: NXT, Supernet, JINN, IOTA, WAVES (even the LISK scam was "advised" by the NXT scammers). They are cancer in crypto.

@DecentralizeEconomics
I understand you are trying to do the the right thing with NXT and you aren't happy with the directional changes of NXT, which takes the originally decent idea into a scam rout. The issue is, individuals with whom you have no problem like CfB and BCNext are very much part of the problem. BCNext's intention was OK with NXT. Originally the man wanted to create an alternative to BTC. Fine, it does make sense to progress and innovate. However, he turned into a lowlife scammer very quickly. Now BCNext is very much supporting the WAVES scam. BCNext is not as innocent as many would like to believe nor he is so mysterious. He is a lowlife Russian scammer.

115  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers on: May 25, 2016, 02:05:25 PM
Fucking LISK scammers.

I told you so … all you idiots who bought into the nonsense of a zero experienced 24 years old student, a shithead, UK based, inexperienced, software developer and a dishonest Garman lawyer who assisted this scam. Which legal professional in his right mind would assist such blatant scam like LISK is?

DDOS attack is my ass.

These wankers couldn't even put together a fucking centralized system, so it has just failed over. Having said that, a continues DDOS attack would be the fair treatment for these scammers, for luring money out from all these idiots. It's maybe time to mobilize the open source community to DDOS the shit out from these scammers. They are cancer in crypto and they must go away from crypto - to jail.

Send me the name and personal details of this wanker, UK based developer Oliver, and I will report him straight away and his epic LISK scam to UK law enforcement. Enough is enough. I stopped the Bitbay scam. I reported the Moolah scammer Ryan Kennedy to the police and he was prosecuted. I pressed charge against the Banx scammers. I reported the IOTA scam. Send me the details and I will report this wanker LISK scammer Oliver as well. More these scammers are jailed the ecosystem will be better.




Thank you, for Your support!


No problem. What's the details of this Oliver wanker? Post here or PM me, and I will forward it immediately to the UK police fraud unit.
116  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: IOTA - Unmoderated thread on: May 25, 2016, 01:59:04 PM
Fucking LISK scammers.

I told you so … all you idiots who bought into the nonsense of a zero experienced 24 years old student, a shithead, UK based, inexperienced, software developer and a dishonest Garman lawyer who assisted to this scam. Which legal professional in his right mind would assist such blatant scam like LISK is?

DDOS attack is my ass.

These wankers couldn't even put together a fucking centralized system, so it has just failed over. Having said that, a continues DDOS attack would be the fair treatment for these scammers for luring money out from all these idiots. It's maybe time to mobilize the open source community to DDOS the shit out from these scammers. They are cancer in crypto and they must go away from crypto - to jail.

Send me the name and personal details of this wanker, UK based developer Oliver, and I will report him straight away and his epic LISK scam to UK law enforcement. Enough is enough. I stopped the Bitbay scam. I reported the Moolah scammer Ryan Kennedy to the police and he was prosecuted. I pressed charge against the Banx scammers. I reported the IOTA scam. Send me the details and I will report this wanker LISK scammer Oliver as well. More these scammers are jailed the ecosystem will be better.



Wrong thread. Create a "LISK - Unmoderated thread" please.

And welcome back!

Good to see you too. I am still on holiday, but the LISK scam requires my expert input.
117  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers on: May 25, 2016, 01:56:57 PM
What Proof do you have to make such a "liable" statement.  Careful with your words or you might be in court yourself.

Fuck off you idiot with your court nonsense.

The LISK scammers will be reported to law enforcement whether the bunch of idiots who paid money for these wankers like it or not.
118  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers on: May 25, 2016, 01:42:26 PM
Fucking LISK scammers.

I told you so … all you idiots who bought into the nonsense of a zero experienced 24 years old student, a shithead, UK based, inexperienced, software developer and a dishonest Garman lawyer who assisted this scam. Which legal professional in his right mind would assist such blatant scam like LISK is?

DDOS attack is my ass.

These wankers couldn't even put together a fucking centralized system, so it has just failed over. Having said that, a continues DDOS attack would be the fair treatment for these scammers, for luring money out from all these idiots. It's maybe time to mobilize the open source community to DDOS the shit out from these scammers. They are cancer in crypto and they must go away from crypto - to jail.

Send me the name and personal details of this wanker, UK based developer Oliver, and I will report him straight away and his epic LISK scam to UK law enforcement. Enough is enough. I stopped the Bitbay scam. I reported the Moolah scammer Ryan Kennedy to the police and he was prosecuted. I pressed charge against the Banx scammers. I reported the IOTA scam. Send me the details and I will report this wanker LISK scammer Oliver as well. More these scammers are jailed the ecosystem will be better.

119  Economy / Reputation / Re: Does anyone really believe that "HONCHO" isn't TPTB_Need_War/Anonymint? on: May 18, 2016, 12:00:22 PM
So in all seriousness, does anyone actually believe that "HONCHO" is a physically separate entity from TPTB_Need_War/Anonymint?  Personally, I think it is blatantly obvious that they are in fact one and the same.  Their writing styles are identical.  Their speech and grammatical usage is identical.  I also find it fairly implausible that anyone would give him money when he's been all talk and no action for years and his mental state is questionable at best.  Maybe in a state of mental flux, a split personality formed to escape from his own lunacy.  It could also be that he has taken a hostage and is forcing them to post on Bitcointalk under duress.  What do you think?

HONCHO looks to be a shared account between jl777 and TPTB. The first posts were James (while TPTB was sleeping), then TBTP took over and his writing style and personality became visible. Nothing wrong with a shared dev account

Well, that's what I said to HONCHO, are you jl777, he has never denied it actually. Though, thinking about it a bit more, I think jl777 James, the chief scammer of NXT/Supernet/WAVES wouldn't bother with this, he doesn't have to - he collects so much money from the idiots in Supernet and WAVES that he is all right, he doesn't need this drama. So I concluded HONCHO = TPTB_Need_War/Anonymint.
120  Economy / Reputation / Re: Does anyone really believe that "HONCHO" isn't TPTB_Need_War/Anonymint? on: May 18, 2016, 11:52:50 AM
Quote
You succeeded in hoodwinking AnonyMint and destroying his reputation by convincing him that he would be on the successful side by speaking out against ICOs, premines, etc.. So that the former reputation that AnonyMint had became unusable when it was time to use it.

When I read this, that HONCHO says smooth has destroyed AnonyMint's reputation by hoodwinking (WTF) I understood that unfortunately HONCHO is a TPTB_need_war sockpuppet. Only the emotional and often  impulsive and sometimes hysterical TPTB_need_war says such melancholy nonsense which in the same time aggressive as well. God bless him, as I said we like him for many reasons, and I genuinely wish he be OK.

I told TPTB_need_war please start working with real people in real world crypto projects. I said to him, you need to be in a project and interacting with developers to unleash your potential instead of arguing in this forum. He said, no no, I want to work with the smartest, i.e. a person who is smarter than he is. Fair enough, but since fucking Einstein is dead, searching for the smartest than TPTB_need_war is an uphill task. So instead of working with anybody, he is go around in this forum by telling that he is the smartest. A bit bizarre as hmachado and others pointed out, but again, I wish I could help him to sort out his problems.

One thing is sure, if I am wrong and HONCHO is not TPTB_need_war sockpuppet, which I doubt very much, but lets assume the unlikely that HONCHO is not TPTB_need_war, then the issue is bigger. This HONCHO nick act even weirder than TPTB_need_war does so don't expect anything more than a drama from the HONCHO-TPTB_need_war partnership.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 ... 93 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!