~
The sender wrote you from the Brand new account and provided a screenshot that can be easily forged. Nevertheless, you decided to create a noise without having a clear evidence. Also, why this person don't speak for himself? If you continue this game in hide-and-seek, it may appear that you are sending letters between your accounts.  Let's see what kind of information we will get The message apparently was sent from the profile volodia2. |
|
|
|
Для pyccкoгoвopящeй aдминиcтpaции:
Я внимaтeльнo oзнaкoмилacь c кaждым "дoкaзaтeльcтвoм! [...]
Я oцeнил пocт cвoeгo млaдшeгo бpaтa, этo былo мoё peшeниe. Bнe зaвиcимocти oт eгo пpaвoты, пoдoбныx oцeнoк c мoeй cтopoны нe пocлeдyeт. Haдeюcь нa ближaйшee вoccтaнoвлeниe peйтингa.
C yвaжeниeм, Bepoникa.
It's weird that you confused the endings of words in Russian. You wrote on behalf of the woman at first, and then of the man - at the end of your comment. |
|
|
|
In every thread, it is generally considered to be a good idea, but theymos has not commented, so we can only assume he doesn't want to show banned accounts publicly for whatever reason.
Someone told before that if people will able to see on the forum that the member is banned, they will be biased against everything written by him/her. However, the "banned" status might be shown to registered users exclusively, on the personal page of the banned member. Therefore, in order to see whether a member is banned or not, you will have to go to his/her page specifically, and this will help to avoid bias.  Pros: - users will not send private messages to banned members; - users will not send merit to banned members; - the number of unnecessary reports will be reduced. In addition, I would like to note that a significant part of banned members is not listed on third-party websites like bpip.org and loyce.club. |
|
|
|
I'm also wondering if this type of obvious framing is ban worthy?
If I understand correctly it's refers to a trust and not regulated by administration ( forum rule #19). |
|
|
|
Seems like all hacked to me except for Anduck ` which seems to be a set for impersonating Anduck maybe? ~
You can see that Anduck `is posting in various bounty threads at the same time with the newbies from the list above. 1) Re: ✅[BOUNTY]🔥🔥🔥 EndChain - Complete Logistical Solution |💰 Up To $900,000 Rewards 💰 ( archive): ndrwholl8, lennyphilips, epkpress, rar 1005, Anduck `2) Re: 🔶🔶[BOUNTY]🚀GoWithMi - Mapping the World on Blockchain🚀10,000,000 GMAT🔶🔶 ( archive): sylvia83, Anduck `, Seattle30, rupasrojiy, victorbl12 3) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5048968.msg49556548#msg49556548 ( archive): norah31, sylvia83, Anduck `, Seattle30 |
|
|
|
Yes, they do that and there is a very clear case of trust abuse happening with me. I am not engaged in any shady active here, even I don't earn form signatures by posting here and there is nothing scammy I have done which should state Warning: Trade with extreme caution!.
This is how they try to mob anyone here who tries to speak in some truth about there manipulative works. This is a clear case of lowering the value of once reputed account, without any prove of it being compressed.
VIP account JusticeForYou has been blocked today.After investigation, I consider the evidence to be most strongly consistent with the hypothesis that his email account was hacked and then used to take his forum account. He has the same email address as before, but it's @gmx.com, and we all know how secure that is. The forum account was first newly-accessed via email-reset rather than by password. IP evidence is also generally suggestive of it not being the same person. I also find his general behavior to be suspicious. I asked him some challenge questions related to data I have and the real BTC_Bear should know, but his answers were only half-correct, and are more consistent with having access to a bunch of emails going back to at least 2011 than having actually lived it. However, while he definitely wouldn't have enough evidence to recover the account if he didn't already have access to it, I have enough doubt that I'm not willing to lock the account at this time. There are plausible explanations for the above evidence against him, and if he is a hacker, he's done an unusually large amount of research, at least. I'd say that there's a 25% chance of him being the original BTC_Bear. I don't have alternative contact info for BTC_Bear or I'd try contacting him. He was very active on #bitcoin-otc IIRC; maybe someone can try asking nanotube or the other #bitcoin-otc regulars. BTW, I'd like to take this opportunity to recognize & thank the original BTC_Bear (whether or not he is the current account owner), who on several occasions went to considerable effort to contribute to the forum in the early days. |
|
|
|
~
I want to focus attention that forum obtain much more benefits if guilty members wouldn't be banned at once and they will need to make good posts to get their signatures back. |
|
|
|
|
I continue to be a witness that users with one violation have the same punishment as notorious spammers, and it doesn't seem very fair.
If there has been a plagiarism then ban offenders which have junior ranks and remove signature from senior members (or write that a signature has been disabled because of copy/pasting), and demand from them to earn 100 merit so they can turn on their signature again. If member with a banned signature make one more copy-paste then block him permanently. I think this would be a better option for the development of the forum than is currently the case.
|
|
|
|
Hi there; username : mstkmstk
I see that I am banned for no reason.~
Copy/pasting probably. a very well thought-out project. i can see an interest into this, so i might as well follow too and see where it will go. Best regards.
I can see an interest into this, so i might as well follow too and see where it will go, the presentation is great.
33. Posting plagiarized content is not allowed.
~ This includes both copying parts or the entirety of other users' posts or threads and copying content from external sources (e.g. other websites) and passing it as your own.
|
|
|
|
~
Is there any other connection between profiles TotSamiy and Wipro, besides this comment? If this only message is enough to tag accounts then Wipro could post similar announcements in the topics of managers he doesn't like and these members will be tagged also. |
|
|
|
So what's with that post? Are you saying you have no idea who that is or why he'd suddenly write a post stating the bounty was over? I haven't read the whole thread past that post, but it does seem odd that Wipro would write that in your thread for no reason--and in the same oversized font, as well. Could it be that this was made by mistake? I've read in Alcedo's thread, their bounty campaign should end by 10 March. Our Bounty Campaign starts 10th December and will go until 10th March.
However, manager Wipro pointed other date, 23 January. Important Update
This campaign is closed today(23:01:2019) 23.59 as per forum time. Reports, stakes related queries and any kind of work after this time will not be considered so kindly help us serve you better. I really do not want last minute hassles. ~
And despite this announcement, Alcedo campaign is still going on: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5082791.5080 |
|
|
|
Copy/pasting without citing the source. Isn't Earth token is the General planet of Cryptocurrencies. And do you know what is the most I like on this project?
That's is Waste-to-energy is the process of generating energy from the primary treatment of waste materials, and is a form of energy recovery. This will really be big help to our nature.
Waste-to-energy is the process of generating energy from the primary treatment of waste materials, and is a form of energy recovery. Waste-to-energy is the process of generating energy from the primary treatment of waste materials, and is a form of energy recovery.
33. Posting plagiarized content is not allowed.
~ This includes both copying parts or the entirety of other users' posts or threads and copying content from external sources (e.g. other websites) and passing it as your own.
|
|
|
|
I am not able to find the pharmacist's post in which the picture of the office of the bounty hunter is shared. They have their own website too. ~
Here it is.  I received a PM today with a typical excuse: Hello sir, I'm representing my friends to appeal about our accounts that you give negative trust due to this post. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4650049.0I wish to inform you that those accounts not belong to a single person, we are making a community to perform bounty campaign. Does working on bounty campaign with our own individual account against the rules? About the those wallet that are connected to each other, we used it to safe the fee of transaction.Some of our team today (the other member are working at home, at the moment):  here is our website : http://kidoelkempoel.com/index.htmlPlease kindly reconsider, and please remove the negative trust on our account. Thank you. I hear the explanation of what I bolded above a lot. Transaction fees are pretty damn low, so there's really no reason why funds should be pooled--and given that blockchain transactions are the only good way to prove accounts are connected, people shouldn't be doing this. I'm hardly swayed by this picture, either. It shows a bunch of shitposters sitting around a shitposting table in a shitposting farm. They deserve negative trust just for that. Give me a fucking break. Guaranteed the women here don't care about bitcoin in the least. They got recruited to spam like suicide bombers get recruited by ISIS. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
