Come on CK give us a restart it's depressing looking at the same best share for half a year now

1. No one has heard of you there are some pretty big names in the miner industry here some pretty close to where you say your based.
2. No reports or even stories about your hardware by anyone in forms of (reviews, setups, ect)
3. You most likely don't have any negative customers because you have NO customers.

I would be up for turning a few of my miners back on to a group solo mine if this was to go ahead and phil was the escrow for it
Not mega power but every little helps

10x v9's
4 s9
7 S3

Dave Kleiman  End of..

Thread has run it's course.

Doublespend Timestamp i'm afraid your research is weak sauce.
Nothing conclusive about this "James"  The text analysis is super sketchy at best and the story is not fitting in that with the line of history we know,.

Now explain this to me and where "James" fits into the picture..

https://www.scribd.com/document/372465601/Complaint#from_embed

Here is my take..

Satoshi was indeed more than one person I believe though only one person ever used the name to communicate in public regarding the project.
I thought for many years that Dave Kleiman Craig Wright were the guys behind bitcoin.

Now we find this lawsuit talking about the creation of bitcoin and its IP and vast funds the pair mined together in a trust.

My theory is that Craig was the guy behind the Satoshi white paper.  
Its very much in his style of writing.

I believe Craig reached out to Dave to help him with the idea and bring it to life.

From the indictment it seems this is being pushed the other direction that Dave was the guy who did the paper and Craig was the coder.

I think there is a lot of valuable info in this that people are missing out on.

Craig indeed did reachout to the family asking them to save any wallet.dat that dave might have had on his machines and promissed the family they would be paid out Davids estate.

I think your idea of this Jmes being the main guy behind bitcoin had many flaws and seems like your trying to push him to the limelight for whatever reason.

just my theory behind it but your welcome to try tear it apart.

Daily Bump.

Surprised that place wasn't the first to go down.
Should be a wake up call to some not to keep funds on exchanges the same old story.

Man puts money in exchange,
Exchange gets hacked,
Man cry on twitter...

Man should learn lesson..

I sent your a link to my discord.

Magic

Legacy start with 1  segwit starts with 3.

You should be able to launch the client with legacy addressing.

add this to your .conf file.


It should then launch with legacy addressing.

You will want to change the values to random non common ascii in chainparams.cpp



Try this recompile and test again.

Site still down? news? 

I guess you changed the peer magic values?
If your running in VM's on the same machine you may have firewall issues?

Post the outputs of the following in code tags from both consoles.

getmininginfo
getpeerinfo
getrawtransaction <TXIDHERE>

Not sure where OP is for this pool but there are issues needing addressed by users.
Would be nice to hear from the OP some time.

Seems to have gone MIA

I would have to agree that it is possible that the finacial crash was indeed anticipated not necicerily by satoshi alone but by many of the ideas that came before were born out of the knowledge that the never ending of printed fiat and debt would only lead one direction, being there was no solution to this problem if the system were to go down I think was the driving force behind many of the ideas that we see in bitcoin today.

One other interesting part of the math behind bitcoin is the fact that people miss or have never even known about bitcoin is the following.

Quote "Hal Finney"

"As an amusing thought experiment, imagine that Bitcoin is successful and
becomes the dominant payment system in use throughout the world.  Then the
total value of the currency should be equal to the total value of all
the wealth in the world. Current estimates of total worldwide household
wealth that I have found range from $100 trillion to $300 trillion. With
20 million coins, that gives each coin a value of about $10 million.

So the possibility of generating coins today with a few cents of compute
time may be quite a good bet, with a payoff of something like 100 million
to 1! Even if the odds of Bitcoin succeeding to this degree are slim,
are they really 100 million to one against? Something to think about..."


From this statement it shows that indeed there was research done into the total household wealth of the world and it was calculated into the total figure for bitcoin to me this shows there was a some thought to there being a total global crisis that would effect the total household wealth of the world.

It's the demo's I am becoming worried about if they know they can send say 5 units out to x5 big names in the youtube or mining game and get a good review then scam the others coming to buy the machine it seems to be the "latest" tactic I know a couple of youtube channels that were sent wallets to test out they sucked and were built of some sketchy version of android!  

I fear we will see this move into the hardware space soon.

Wow.

amazing to see the response to the topic.

Thank you all who posted your 2018 memories and your 2019 predictions.
I wish you all the best this year and to keep pushing bitcoin to be the leader of the pack. 

Stay clear until someone has a unit from them to test.

Though I think by now the scammers know the best way to hook people is to make a few devices send for review then wait for the flood gates to open.

If you didn't have to turn off your mine that is.
Some wont recover now.

I must start off by giving credit to the op for such a informative post and well published doc's on the subject.
It is becoming a rare thing to see people putting in the effort like this and credit should be dew for this.

One advantage of his type of network is that it can transfer data quickly, even with large number of devices connected because the data only flows in one direction, so there can't be any data collisions.
However, the real disadvantage is that if the main cable fails or any node is faulty, then the entire network will fail.

Self-Stabilizing Structured Ring Topology P2P Systems
https://ccl.northwestern.edu/2005/ShakerReevesP2P.pdf

I do like the concept behind this structure but I am unsure it would be suitable for bitcoin dew to the complexity of the structure as posted already by aliashraf.

I look forward to reading more of your work.

I wil credit some merit when I next have some.

MagicByt3

Of course it's un-true.  You could solve a block with a usb stick if your lucky its all about the luck..
No luck. No Block.

Hell, someone here found a block with a s5 here not too long ago.

Just got to keep crunching those numbers and keep the fingers crossed.

I am going to cover the entire early code base in one topic so people don't need to hunt about to find the things they want to know.
I think it would be a good way for people to visualize bitcoin and understand the underlying code behind it.

Its not just about op codes the entire codebase will be layed out here to help people understand it a little better or to allow a quick reference point  for questions regarding all things bitcoin.