Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 10:30:21 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 [51] 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 ... 233 »
1001  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: 0.96.4 RC1 on: November 24, 2017, 05:30:32 PM
Ah indeed, the signer and online instance need to be in lockstep.
1002  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Is there a good "recipie" for spending from a P2SH-P2PK address in bitcoin-qt? on: November 24, 2017, 05:11:23 PM
That is certainly understandable. I will look into it, but I'm not sure where I should advertise the bounty. Is there anywhere in particular with good prospects? 

I guess start it here and link it on whatever forum/subreddit the BTG crowd hangs in.
1003  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: setSatoshiDir: Directory does not exist on: November 24, 2017, 05:09:52 PM
Top sticky thread.
1004  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: 0.96.4 RC1 on: November 24, 2017, 05:09:16 PM
I've setup on a clean new machine and now it works.
The signer still need to be fixed on my side as the signed TX is not recognized but i'm able to just broadcast the raw tx.

Do you have an error log for that last part?
1005  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: setSatoshiDir: Directory does not exist on: November 24, 2017, 03:32:29 PM
Ah, I misread, I thought you were using a shortcut. Now I just realized you are using 0.96.3. Update to RC1.
1006  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Illegal instruction (core dumped) on: November 24, 2017, 03:19:22 PM
That does not work, the installed version crashes (did that in my first post, for v0.96.3 branch and testing branch). Or maybe I did something wrong or got confused.

You'd want to do that on the binaries you built from source.
1007  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Is there a good "recipie" for spending from a P2SH-P2PK address in bitcoin-qt? on: November 24, 2017, 03:18:12 PM
Quote

<meme>So you're saying... there's a chance.</meme>

Yeah, definitely. It's mostly a matter of schedule and effort.

Quote
Since I suspect there are more than just a few people who would like to take advantage of the airdrop but currently can't, I would like to pledge 20 BTG as "gratitude money" for a version of Armory that works with bitcoin gold's bitcoin-qt client, to be paid in BTC or any other crypto of your choice.

I would rather you put together a bounty for someone to do the work so that I just have to review a PR. I don't need your money, I'd be getting an airdrop as well if I was to implement BTG support.

Quote
On the one hand I would personally like to be able to access my stuck coins, and on the other hand I think that enabling seamless fork arbitrage is important to the overall health and growth of the ecosystem.

I'm a solo act and can't afford to support every fork under the sky under the guise of airdropped $$$. The airdrop part is a dangerous enough precedent as it is. Unless these forks demonstrate some form of resilience, I won't be looking at them.

Not to mention that the effort to support BTG is like 3x that of BCH and this falls at a bad time on my schedule too. At any rate, I can't deal with BTG until my new SSD is delivered, as I'm out of free space (too many copies of the blockchain =O)
1008  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory on the command line? on: November 24, 2017, 03:02:10 PM
Like create transactions and broadcast through the command line?
1009  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: setSatoshiDir: Directory does not exist on: November 24, 2017, 03:01:43 PM
it's --satoshi-datadir. You're missing the dashes.
1010  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: setSatoshiDir: Directory does not exist on: November 23, 2017, 11:35:51 PM
Do you have a Core installation and the blockchain synced?
1011  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Illegal instruction (core dumped) on: November 23, 2017, 07:37:07 PM
Quote
Thanks for the explanation. Do you have a recommended list of proccessors? (so I can buy one that will work well next time)

Just use the noasm builds. If you're looking to update, you'll need a stronger CPU anyways (seeing you're going online with this machine), blockchain ain't getting smaller! But I digress. Generally, laptop CPUs have much less silicon to save on power, so only mid-high end laptop CPUs will have all the good stuff. Desktop CPUs are different, basically any i3 from 2010 will have all that you need.

Quote
Perhaps "not installed" would be a more appropriate phrasing. Basically, running Armory by doing:

You can 'sudo make install' after building from source.
1012  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: armory won't restore my wallet on: November 23, 2017, 05:14:09 PM
Update Armory.
1013  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: armory won't restore my wallet on: November 23, 2017, 02:36:23 PM
No, post it on pastebin
1014  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory is offline(all block nodes are offline) on: November 23, 2017, 02:07:21 PM
Update Armory and delete your database folder.
1015  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: armory won't restore my wallet on: November 23, 2017, 02:06:43 PM
Post armorylog.txt
1016  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Illegal instruction (core dumped) on: November 23, 2017, 02:04:58 PM
Quote
I read some threads in this forum and it was mentioned that my CPU might not support SSE4, but it is a Celeron J3455 which supports SSE4.

It's more than just SSE4, there's also pclmul and AES. Also washed down iteration, such as SSE4.a won't cut it.

Quote
But I'd like to not have to run the uncompiled version all the time. Any help to resolve this will be appreciated. Thanks.

What is an "uncompiled" version? The fix to this is to build yourself from source, or use the noasm .deb (https://github.com/goatpig/BitcoinArmory/releases/download/v0.96.3.99/armory_0.96.3.99-gcc4.7-noasm_amd64.deb)

Code:
-ERROR - ;�: (WalletManager.cpp:78) Failed to open wallet with error:
missing main wallet entry

This means you need to delete .lmdb mirror wallets in your Armory datadir.
1017  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: 0.96.4 RC1 on: November 22, 2017, 10:59:17 PM
Put the call in a try block and print the error message. Something like this:

Code:
         try:
            cppPrevTx = TheBDM.bdv().getTxByHash(txhash)
         except DbErrorMsg as e:
            print e.what()
            raise e

Btw this traceback is for code from master (0.96.3). Have you reproduced the same issue with the testing branch?
1018  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Is there a good "recipie" for spending from a P2SH-P2PK address in bitcoin-qt? on: November 22, 2017, 06:11:19 PM
It is but I've had other stuff thrown on my lap these past couple days which need my immediate attention. So, no guarantees.
1019  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Getting private keys in WIF or BIP38 on: November 22, 2017, 03:44:44 PM
Edit: Is it right that WIF = Base58?

Yes.
1020  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: 0.96.4 RC1 on: November 22, 2017, 02:20:08 PM
It's suggesting your DB is corrupt.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 [51] 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 ... 233 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!