Yes monocrypt is a scam, so is sidecrypt and westcrypt, and any other crypt which clones Cex.io.hi
one person send me pm <snip> is this not a joke?
No, it's not a joke, it's attempted theft. Post a screen shot of the pm and the sender will get negative trust, or banned if they have been spamming it. |
|
|
|
Where have we heard this saying "punch a nazi" before? It is almost like the left has been normalizing violence... Famous left winger, Captain America.  |
|
|
|
❗️The team of STIPS|FinTech has recently announced its new representative office’s establishment in Hong Kong attempting to cater to the Asian market.
But surely your partners, AA Union Capital of Singapore, would be the people to cater to the Asian market? seeing as they are Aa Union Capital Is World's Leading Vc Fund For Blockchain & Cryptos Investment what with their team of over 135 investment professionals and 85 liscenced (sic) experts although I do find it a bit strange that with all these highly qualified personnel, the only one that is actually seen/named in public is Selina Bo/A.....
On the subject of "offices", you haven't got back to me yet about the UK company registration details of STIPS Fintech limited. Remember?
The company is registered in the United Kingdom.
...but the main one is based in the UK.
Based or registered? There is a considerable difference. (: |
|
|
|
Still spamming this shit? "BlueOcean" plagiarize other sites, claim non existent trademarks, cite English law for a supposed St. Vincent and Grenadines company and generally appear to be a compete sham, as I pointed out here, the last time this newbie account posted similar garbage. |
|
|
|
And anyway, keep in mind that if competition for mining is hard in 2018...When you get electricity cheaper than competitors in a quite cold country, you have a huge advantage.
$0.03 (as Ice Rock claim they're paying) isn't fantastically cheap and Kazakhstan isn't particularly cold. Any (slim) advantage IR may have on those two fronts has to be weighed against the huge disadvantage of being disorganized, arrogant and inexperienced. They are a fat, naive minnow in a sea of mining cartel sharks. |
|
|
|
Heh heh, looks like DT3's a cool place to be, look at the company I'm keeping....   and I don't get outraged scammers inboxing me with abuse for Red Tagging them (not very often anyway, unless they've checked their "junk" untrusted feedback)  And just to confirm what I think is so: If you go to Trust summary>Trust settings>Trust depth (max 4) and change the default from 2 to 3, then all the feedback that DT3 members have left will appear (for you only) as red/green numbers under the appropriate profiles and in their "trusted feedback", just as Levels 1 and 2 do by default setting?
maybe instead of saying you're basing these ratings on "Marketplace Trust System" you could say something like "Trust lists", or "Trust Hierarchy". That's just my two cents, but if all of this information is available for everybody within a couple of clicks, how is it helpful to post it in thread format?
As far as I can see, it's just an easy to read summary of the hierarchical version of the trust network which as you say, is available within a couple of clicks, but also rather opaque (to me anyway). I don't think OP's trying to set up a "Trust Fork" or reinvent the wheel, from what I can make out. |
|
|
|
|
I'm interested to see what happens when metameritsnafflers cotton on to OP's seeming policy of "a merit for a reply" on this thread.
Not for me thanks mate, I'm good.
|
|
|
|
Me too. Is it real investigation or some sort of scam? Where did police find emails? The address is "real", and so is a DS Peter Stewart. |
|
|
|
A fascinating story. Be aware that these days consecutive posts over a short time frame usually get deleted. |
|
|
|
Just curious mate, what's the odds of he actually wrote that words? This is a very short sentence.
Completely accidental "plagiarism", you mean? I must admit I find this an interesting theoretical question but, being no mathematician, I don't have a clue. Based on the calcs from this reply1 to the question " What is the probability of someone writing a paragraph where 20 consecutive words match someone else's writing?"Even if the chance of a word being selected is 1/2, the probability of 20 words being selected exactly in sequence is 9.53674316 e-7. That leaves us with 0.00000954% chance. 1 SourceSorry, I'm just a little bit paranoid someone will report me because of some phrase like "I agree with your statements."
Well, if that's the entirety of a post then I guess it would be deleted as contentless, but being permabanned for plagiarism is rather more serious. I attempted to humorously illustrate the dangers of a Reducto ad absurdum approach here. |
|
|
|
|
Phishing site, don't click the link.
Poor old Lisa.
|
|
|
|
I have been following....My goal is to be able to do this semi full time. .... how to do this step by step?.....
Thank you for any advise you are willing to lend me
79%+ of people with this CV lose their money attempting it. |
|
|
|
While you are talking to your legal partner, perhaps you could ask him why that, in your [ANN] thread, your representative is misleading potential investors regarding the legal status of STIPS FinTech Limited, as he seems unwilling or unable to respond to my point despite seemingly authoritatively stating previously, more than once, something that appears to be untrue. What jurisdiction did you choose?
The company is registered in the United Kingdom. According to your T&C this is not so STIPS FinTech Limited a Belize company with the registry code 171,691 and address at Suite 508, Marina Towers, Newtown Barracks, Belize City, Belize, Central America "Dear Sir, Please note that our main operational company which holds IP and other main assets of the project is based in UK. An issuer of tokens from Belize is just an SPV which was incorporated for a purpose of ICO and issuance of tokens. Such segregation is made to minimize risks and keep safe the main operational company from any negative risks connected with global crypto/ICO regulation". Thanks for that, although of course it begs the question below that I have asked on your main thread and to which I have received no acknowledgement or reply, so maybe you can clarify how, if your company is UK registered, it doesn't show as such on the UK Government company registration website?
Why we actually continue this dialog?
I can't answer for the OP, but when your main thread is monitored by someone whose responses seem to be limited to "Have a nice day" and who needs to refer to management (you) on a simple subject like incorporation, then personally I go straight to the management (here) for answers. As in the English saying, "talk to the organ grinder, not the monkey". Do you think that creating a group with empty accusations of our project in a scam, getting satisfactory answers to your accusations and still not removing this group- is it normal? I ask you to observe the limits of decency and if you have any questions to write them in an understandable form in the main group of the project in BTT or on official information resources. Create a group with a loud name "Scam" shows to everyone that you a scandalous person who does not understand the questions you ask. Unfortunately, "scandal" and "scam" are the lingua franca of this forum. It has turned out that way because of the huge number of scandals and scams that come thru here every day. |
|
|
|
I think it's a dead coin. Just where are these scammers now?  Fucking fucking I'm not the sort of person to say "I told you so", but.... So, with the swap users move to a premined coin, right?
More or less an ICO, where the devs fully control the coin?
you got it ...  Which is kinda convenient isn't it, in the theoretical situation where Swiscoin is and always was invented purely to scam |
|
|
|
anyone who wants to make an investment in this project will receive a minimum of 360% per year ...It's not scam I'm sure Sure. |
|
|
|
It seems to me that many members of the forum have outdated concepts about the Ponzi scheme. In order to conduct a dialogue in the right direction, we must first give a clear concept of what the Ponzi scheme is. And where, besides financial pyramids (as this market was dubbed), is it still used at the state level?
Only after that, it will be possible to scatter the terminology of Ponzi and brand everything in a row.
US Dollar - Ponzi Scheme?
It seems to me that you are using a standard deflection/denial strawman argument ("outdated"..."What about central banks?"... "Everything is a pyramid") that Ponzi/pyramid scammers have been using for years. The only marginally gray area where schemes, which have no (or insufficient) core profit generation activity and hence pay out later investors' funds to earlier investors, should be labelled as "scams" is whether they lie about it or not. This aspect has been discussed several times. If you say "We are experienced FX/arbitrage/whatever traders and pay daily trading returns of x%", whereas in reality the x% comes from new investors money, then you are a Ponzi scam. If you say "our scheme is based on a smart contract which allocates x% returns when new deposits are sufficient to do so" then it can be argued that it is a Ponzi "game", as there has been no attempt to mislead regarding the source of the x%. |
|
|
|
Right now, the people earning merit the fastest are the ones that are compiling and analyzing merit data. :/
Yes, you are right. Some of them didn't earn merit for anything else but merit analysis which is sad. My opinion is that the people whom deserve to rank up should be mainly knowledgeable in crypto currency, not in how the forum works. ... Yeah, posting about posting about posting  A corrupt (meritized?) form of omphaloskepsis |
|
|
|
|
Congratulations.
As becoming a multi millionaire is only a matter of time for you, why are you bothering to post here?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
