and the foolish thing badecker keeps forgetting. because he has been told this many times

that the confirmation of covid is not by pure PCR
its actually if you simplify it down a 3 step process and PCR is the middle part

when saying PCR alone wont confirm covid. that is true. because it needs steps before PCR and steps after PCR to be the full confirming test parameters

once badecker remembers that he has been told that its the chemicals to isolate the virus(1) the PCR to replicate them(2) the chemicals to test for them(3)

that stage 2 alone wont work as it doesnt know what its replicating and doesnt then verify its replicated what it should have

stage 1 and 3 do that
and thats the stupid thing badecker and his fellow clowns keep avoiding. the fact that a covid test is much more than just (2)pcr

there is actually more risk of fault/error at stages 1 and 3 than at stage 2. and if badecker realised the stages involved he would understand how important it is to get stages 1 and 3 right because 1 and 3 are the important parts..

its like making a cake the important parts are the ingrediants and the icing afterwards
you can make a cake in many different ovens or even microwaves but if the ingredients are not right it wont make a cake. and if the icing after aint right it wont look like a cake

badecker this and is trying to suggest that a specific oven is the main ingrediant sorry. but no and if a oven is branded as roaast dinner oven then is should never be used to bake a cake

not relaising the secret to baking a cake is in the ingrediants and the icing..

the other part of the "scientifically meaningless" is that having covid or not is real. but the test has no context of informing if that person being tested is severly symptomatic or just a cough or assymptomatic. thus the test alone doesnt help scientists work out the severity of sickness
so the test combined with data of another source of things like hospitalisation rates is more helpful as combined info

yes more tests = more people having it. but when combining it with hospitalisation data.
(take UK stats of ~800 a day test positive and 150 hospitalised = 18% severity of those tested)
thus the data of covid tests becomes more meaningful when used in combination with other data

funny how bigtree' never mentions the health of those that get sick but keeps promoting the need for spreading the virus 'to get the economy back'

when someone cares more about money than health. more about greed and selfish desire that the health of the community. and someone that promotes darwins survival of the fittest(eugenics) .. you gotta wonder why they are even pretending to say that their actions are for peoples benefits

seems more like the taxmans benefit

do u ever notice that i give actual advice and explanation

badecker one day says megadose on vit c even if you dont need it, then he says something different but then hints that magadosing is ok.. but then hints not to overdo it

he can never make up his mind thus defeats his own point of even saying things

1. orange fruit is best form of vitamin C consumption as its a slow release natural way
2. small glass OJ spread out over the day is second best
3. small dose vit C supplement regular is next
4. large glass OJ in one go. mostly goes to waste and causes rush/crash
5. megadose vit c supplement mostly goes to waste and causes more issues

1 or 2 is all people need. 3 only if you have symptoms of vit c deficiency and unable to eat/drink more
4-5 are not advisable at all

badecker pretends to say option 1 but is really just trying to subtly offer option 5 again
he is stuck in the trained script of supplement sales man offering bulk offers

sorry badecker but just because 1 is ok does not mean you can pretend 5 is the same as 1
his stupid subtle hints that megadosing is ok is in red.. which negate the other points

funny part is.. as always

the topic creator talks al about clickbaiting and getting peopel to advertise each other. and big idea's of forming a large multinational corporation, with scheduled business meetings and such

but he doesnt even go into the detail about what desirable content of the blogs people would want to read.

just seems like a pay-per-click circle jerk to me
'ill send you 20 views if you get 20 people to come to my site'.. rinse and repeat

guess you missed the posts of badecker telling people to drink bleach and also the news of someone in his own homestate dying due to it . yet badecker knowing one of his own locals died due to it still thought people should drink bleach and he carried on for many weeks after telling people to drink it(facepalm)

you would be very surprised that there are ~10% of people that think covid is fake
you would be very surprised that 20% of people think that sick people get treated in the public lobby of a hospital and not the private wards

and the most surprising thing of all the 10% people that think its fake majority of them are 'preppers' that always think of conspiracys of there being secret wars in peacetime so need to prep. but when an actual event occurs that would be worthy of prepping. they deny it even happened and call it fake news

there is just no logic to these idiots

as for the topic.
it seems jetcash translates
'FDA wont even consider a vaccine as worthy if its under 50% effective'
to be
'FDA is releasing a vaccine thats only 50% effective'

sorry but no
there are many vaccines in progress and they are not just gonna buy the one that only reaches the minimum and stick with that one. they have yet to even know how effective any vaccine is but wont even consider any below 50% and so when vaccines are released they will pick the best one

they say "our first one wont be our best and we are aiming for above 75% effectiveness"
but in short any that result in say 49% wont even be considered for further funding to refine it and work out the 'glitches' to get it to a higher number

this is why medical experts are saying 12-18 months because they have to go through a few rounds of testing and tweaking and refining and retesting.

yea trump might want to get doctors to use one thats only 51% effective in 6 months. but thats trump.
over promise/under deliver. remember trump has yet to 'build the wall'.. its been years since that 'promise'

BULLCRAP
no paper is estimating 90%
all studies of actual antibody tests (not myth stories) are saying estimates of 2%-10% in the UK depending on hotspot area

even general math case numbers even if you multiply it by 10 per 'case confirmed' still does not have an above 10% math figure
heck even if you say for every 1 person sick there are 99 infected and not sick is still no were near 90%

if there is 310k confirmed cases and we say only 10% of people infected get tested. then thats 3.1mill infected with a 90% assymptomatic/untested rate of the 310k

3m out of 65m is only 5%
still much better then the case test amount of 310k which is 0.5% infected
but assuming 59mill(90%) people have had it is pure myth with no foundation or even any ethical math to back it up

nope

if you have a beam and split it
so
0sec    1sec   2sec  3sec  4sec  5sec
     A                                             B
     |                                              |
*-<                                               |
      \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/


the photon at B  is not the 'pair' of the one at A
B's first photon is not A's first photon
when you finally see B's first photon your also looking at A's 15,000,000,000,000,000,000th photon and A's first photon passed 5 seconds ago(its gone.)
the beam is sending out 3quin of photons a second and a simple crystal/mirror is not 'splitting the photon'
if it were that easy then the hadron collector should have been replaced with a crystal loving homeopathy warehouse

whats happening is
if you were to stop the light at B. you would think it takes 5 seconds extra to feedback to A meaning you would notice the change at the 10th second due to the 5second delay mechanism
(affecting the 30quinth A photon)


however if you interupt the B beam at 5 seconds in the gamma range. the gamma signal feeds back and messes with the other beam 0.000,001sec after interupting it (5.000,001sec into experiment) not 0 seconds into experiment and not 10seconds into experiment
and stupid people think that the interuption signal must have gone back intime by 5.001 seconds to reach * at minus 0.001 second and is affecting A's first photon because they think a simple crystal/mirror can split a photon

yes there is a gamma wave still linking A to B but at the 5th second your watching B's first photon and A's 15quintillionth photon instead of the presumed first of 30quintillionth photon
and thus affecting B your then causing a noticable change to A's 15,000,0001trillionth photon

its not proving time travel or photon splitting.
its proving a 'spooky' linkage of the beam at a higher speed than photons were presumed to be linked at

no experiment has actually seen a change in A 5 seconds before even doing anything to B
the experiment has seen A affected 0.000,001 seconds after affecting B instead of 5 seconds later

ill try to make it simple

imagine 10 seconds
an electron travels 20,000km in 10 seconds
a photon travels 1.82million km in 10 seconds or the same 20k distance in 0.1 seconds
and the gamma part travelled the same 20km distance in 0.00000001seconds
but old science never bothered measuring photons/gamma. as it was too fast for instruments.

its a bit like police speed camera devices.. if you go over 200mph they cant detect you so you wont get a speeding ticket. your treated as breaking the law but also not breaking the law thus just not even considered worthy of following up on. and just considered as a spooky blur on their camera

so now if you can view the photon(0.1sec) and then react at the photon signal, to intercept the electron at the 5th second mark (kinda easy as you have 0.1 to see photon signal and 0.05 to send something back to the midpoint)
meaning if when you get the photon signal you know in 9.9seconds you will get a electron signal
you send a photon signal back at 4.85 seconds after you got the photon signal.to intercept the electron at the 5th second mark thus interupting/interfering with the electron at the 10th second
thus then able to change what electron signal you might get

its not going back in time. the electron already was released from the source at 0 seconds and is already on its way at the 0.1second photon view of the source. you cant send a photon back to stop the source. all you can do is affect the signal of something delayed based on knowing the delayed thing is on its way and interupting that delayed thing before it gets to its destination

no you are not sending info into the past

imagine the ocean. its both particles of h2o and acts as waves

the particle linkage at both the gamma('spooky instant superfast') and the electron/photon speed(slower in comparison) means when the tide is out at one end the tide is in at the other.
before a particular wave receeding at one side reaches the other side

however although you instantly can tell that if the tide is in at one ocean side means you instantly know the tide is out at the other. normal/old science was ignoring the tide(gamma connection). and instead only observing the waves(photon/electron connection)

its like a tsunami. by ignoring the tide going out just before a tsunami and only reacting to the large wave coming in later. means what you are observing only the large wave at the photon level, which means what you are seeing is the reaction minutes after the action

however the tide going out due to a asteroid/earthquake tugging the water away from your side is not you viewing that an asteroid hit before it hit. it just means you are now observing the action of the event at the very instant it happens
however a neighbour that didnt see the tide going out and only seen the wave coming in. thinks the asteroid strike causing the tsunami happened later because they are only viewing the wave not the particle tugging

it might be spooky to that neighbour, and he may ask why you were running for cover before he ran for cover. and will say you must be psychic and able to see the future. but no
its just you are viewing it from a different prospective to know whats about to come
by observing the action instantly rather than the delayed reaction

..
to imagine it another way
imagine a 2 man and a rope tug of war game across the ocean.
if one man on one side shakes the rope to cause a wave/ripple along the rope. it takes time for the other person to see the ripple but his hands feel the vibrations/tug before the wave reaches

yep pulling on the rope can be felt before seeing the rope shake

by relying on touch means you can predict when you should expect to see the ripple.
thus makes you able to then grab the rope tighter so it dont slip out of your hand before the ripple actually gets to your hand

but it does not mean you can change the history by tugging back(pulling to cause rope tension) to prevent the other guy from shaking
yes your cancelling out the ripple AT YOUR END but you are not stopping the guy from doing it.
your simply making the ropes shake no longer visible at your end by altering the tension at your end

its not time travel into the past
its observing things at gamma speeds to then predict or react to the light speed of the result at your end before the light speed gets to you

in short running away from a tsunami when the tide goes out before seeing the large wave comes in doesnt mean you stopped the asteroid hitting the ocean. it just means you predicted a tsunami was going to happen and you moved accordingly before other naive observers.
raising the flood barriers to offset the tsunami at the tide going out stage does not mean that you stopped the asteroid it just means you cancelled/blocked the tsunami from getting to the destination before it effects the coastline by knowing that the tsunami was going to hit the coast in 5 minutes

your not affecting the source. your interupting the reaction in the middle of its journey by being able to observe the subtle near invisible hints before the major action is observed

its about using different apparatus to view the other normally unmeasured actions to effect the result onroute before the slower observation reacts

so the topic creators theory is flawed by not understanding the gamma, neutrino attraction between particles which react faster then the electron photon speeds

time machine in the unrealistic thought of a physical person or signal going back in time is impossible. even in REAL quantum physics

what is the REAL theory of REAL quantum mechanics is that all photons that bounced off of someone 200 years ago is still present in some small miniscule amount. and with the right instrument that can filter out the other photons(visual noise) and isolate the photons of a certain age. can then reveal a picture of a specific time

..
the whole sci-fi 'spooky' different dimensional crap is not real quantum mechanics but used as a misdirect so that certain groups can actually study the real quantum mechanics and leave the more naive people wasting time/money on things that wont work

a 'deadman' switch would actually need to know someone was dead. which is usually an attorney reading a will.

a technological deadman switch without some conspiracy device injected into the body would be where someone has to access a certain device/email/phone and confirm they are still fine to not trigger it. where the lack of response is the technical trigger

in reality its usually having some 3rd party person being made responsible to release into under certain conditions.
and yea the next game is.. if maxwell was epsteins 'switch' she didnt out the high profile people at his death. because she decided to use that info to help herself avoid problems

and is now not saying anything in the hopes high profile people will step in and save her with a relaxed sentance/freedom

and knowing the greed and ego of people in those circles whomever is in maxwells circle as her switch. would probably not auto-release should she die/not get a relaxed sentance. but instead use the info for their own personal benefit.
thus a cycle of blackmail for benefits would keep going around rather than releasing info that can take a high profile person down

you have to put it into context of alot of other data to come to any summary
theres even great info about the how many cops are in the street per 100k populous
and how many 'police employees' total vs cops on street

las vegas has more station based police than officers on the street
where as chicago has more officers on the street than 'employee's in the station

this usually shows how police budgets are spent
for instance washington DC has a high 'employee' level and a high officer level and also a high ratio of the mix
this means well funded departments that can afford lots of detectives and lots of officers
however chicago has half the budget per populous and so the spend a little more of the limited budget for officers on the street than on detectives

this results on them wanting to do 'quick arrests' to get maximum benefit of their budget. and not want to do detailed investigations/detective work
also the evidence gathering and attention to detail about truly proving a crime is done by a suspect which leads to more innocent people getting arrested for more petty stuff just to get their arrest numbers up

other interesting data points are
seatle has a higher 'household income' that washington DC, so you would think this would mean more state tax = more 'law enforcement employees/officers'
year washington DC has more officers based on numbers per 100k populous
chicago has a lower household income = less state tax.. yet has more cops than seatle

so its no surprise that in a lower household income area with higher cops and not much detective work. then yea certain petty crimes that can be handled quickly get handled

where as other area's where there is more being spent on detectives. and where the income is higher then less of the petty crimes are handled and they actually bother to investigate and only concentrate on the bigger crimes that matter

though it is surprising to see that badecker moves away from his usual influencers adverts of getting people to buy chemical supplements. but its worthy of mentioning the moments of actual awakening when badecker actually realises the hole he got himself into
 
however a few details have to be highlighted
'juicing' does not help. yes it causes the nutrients to enter your blood stream faster because it bypasses many digestive processes. but that can actually cause issues with your digestive system too. and also skips some metabolism processes and doesnt actually get used properly by the body

because processes that should take a few hours to process naturally to absorb whats needed. just go straight into your system

this is why even if you have 2 oranges.. one in fruit form and one juiced
you get a bigger sugar rush and the vitamins then get filtered out because at the 2-4 hour period after drinking it.. most of it gets pissed out.

however the fruit form is absorbed slower and it includes fibre meaning the vitamins are absorb in a more acceptable rate and used by the body over a 6-12 hour period thus your body actually uses more vitamins

EG
juice example     fruit example
  |\
 |  \                    ,~~~~~~~,
/    \_______     /                  \
12345678910    1234567891011
thats for nutrients and sugars
having a sugar high is not actually 'feeling better/healthier' its just a trick your mind is playing and that trick then has the sugar/nutrition crash after.

small amounts regular is better than mega dose binges
having it in the right effective form works too

and also knowing what is actually helpful to then know what to have
by this, i mean thinking vitamin C is the sole solution for everything is the most foolish think ever said by badecker


and i explained all this because badecker was saying people should have thousands of milligrams of vitamin C in one go. which isnot just going to mean 99% is peed out in a couple hours.. but is also going to cause a sudden spike for 1-2 hours and then a crash. and the rest is peed out at the 2-4th hour
which is why its not recommended.
such a sudden rush of such huge amounts can actually cause issues
it actually starts to mess with the blood oxygen levels of people and can cause a kind of 'shock' to the system
thus ding the opposite of helping

which is why its better to have regular low dose EG a small glass of OJ a few times a day rather than a whole litre of OJ in the morning.
same with calcium. small amounts of milk in coffee throughout the day is better then drinking a whole carton/bottle of milk in the morning
same is said for many things, sugars, alcohol fats, carbs, and other nutrients

one massive meal and a litre of orange juice to wash it down is more harmful than the same total quantity but spread out in 3 meals of 1/3rd the total quantity

just taking more megadose vit C supplement in the morning(if vit c deficient) wont be helping you throughout the day and makes you become more intolerant where your body just tries to purge it in single use megadose form. thus you end up getting even less out of it than just taking a regular dose


say the daily intake of vit C is 90mg
your body would be using 16mg every couple hours(12 hours awake division)
so having 2000mg tablet in the morning = only 16-32mg used and then 1968+mg just peed out in 4 hours

repeat this and over time your body just treats the rush/crash as a threat and so the needed 16mg then doesnt even get to where its needed and then more of the 2000mg is purged and yet your body is still begging for vit C
(this is the same as the diabetics. too many sugar rushes causes your body to no longer want to absorb sugar normally(body slows down insulin production and ramps up kidney function to purge/convert the sugar)

however having 16mg every 4 hour(per meal) your body absorbs what it needs and actually allows your body to do its function throughout the day rather then rush/crash in 2 hours. and isnt trying to purge it after 2 hours as its not getting the rush/crash 'shock'
thus it regulates your body to function better for longer

..
in short eating an orange fruit is better than drinking the equivalent in juice. but if you are a juicer. have 1/3rd.. 3 times a day rather than megadose once a day

but unless your actually deficient of that nutrient then know alot of it will be peed out so dont waste lots of money trying to overdo it unless you need to, and then do it in moderation

i think jetcash is hinting that he lives in a motorhome. and has to borrow morrisons(US:safeways) free wifi to get on the internet

but thats more about a lifestyle choice jetcash made about his life. but blames it on others

BULL crap
reputable scientists take the most infected neighbourhoods and then test those that are willing to be tested and get the 60% figure for that neighbourhood. and 56% for another high contagious area . and then get another of only 13%
and then from area's outside the epicenter states the number is far far far far low
and they say as such

but then idiots take a 60% number and stupidly think it applies to everywhere

in short
if an idiot has had sex with 2 of the 3 of the only women he knows (66% success rate)
does not mean that he has had sex with 66% of all women
just 66% of a small limited group of woman in a small neighbourhood of known high sluttynesss

nor does that figure suggest that all men can have a 66% success rate with women
nor does it suggest that 66% of women are sluts

..
but as always jetcash says a number but cant back it up
im still waiting for jetcash to show the uptodate proof of his suggested 'number 36 on the severity list' that he has mentioned a few times in different topics

well in your sheltered world you wont hear about it. but thats more about your ignorance than whats really happening in the world.

.. replying to below
thats why the world is experiencing the real issues and why your trying hard to remain ignorant to pretend its not there. by avoiding hearing the science and facts, you dont make it disappear. you just make yourself look like a fool

you link reprimanded ex doctors who misquote other doctors

i showed you the links to the actual reports.
just because you cant read them doesnt make them irrelevant it just means your asking for things you never want to understand and thus you become more of an idiot by ignoring the info you asked for by saying that you cant understand it

if your not prepared to learn something. then stop asking for it
but all you do is ask and the moan that you dont understand it..
so try to learn how to understand it. do some proper research.. or admit you have no intention of learning. and you dont actually want real answers.

January
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/expert-says-killer-coronavirus-spread-21352748

february
https://www.vox.com/2020/2/28/21157769/how-to-prevent-the-coronavirus

March
https://www.mirror.co.uk/science/coronavirus-red-eyes-key-sign-21752329

april
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-eyes-contagious-infection-conjunctivitis-italy-wuhan-a9482186.html

may
https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/1280951/coronavirus-latest-update-symptoms-ocular-pink-eye-conjunctivitis-covid-19

oh look they been saying about be careful of your eyes even in the first 5 months..

i already linked you the sequencing of thousands
and i even showed you clusters of thousands done one process and also clusters of them done other processes. thus it also debunks your other scripts of a flawed process

different countries have many many many thousands of records of patients. hospitals in local area's use one process for their thousands of patients. other area's use other processes and yet they all come to the same results.

your in ability to read and click links is your problem of your own personal ignorance. so dont blame your ignorance as the reason(you think) the virus doesnt exist. blame your ignorance as the reason your ignorant. because reality is the virus does exist

now change your script because your very out of date with reality