australia transport wine in big vats/caskets to the UK..
UK bottle it.
UK sell it to europe as 'australian wine bottled in UK'.
now its a UK origin product because UK done something to it
yet now australia can sell wine to europe tarriff free
...
you would be surprised what they get away with.

rules of origin at normal ports. have slightly different rules than what coming via freeports

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-outlines-new-plans-for-freeports-to-turbo-charge-post-brexit-trade

you will be surprised what little needs to be done to 'process them into a final good'

be sure to keep an eye on products that say '[random country] [product] packaged in the UK'
american made iphone. reboxed in the uk

put your reading glasses on
as said. using the mouse report(forth link in the post o made a few posts up)
that is the overall of all 4 koch postulates

when you read the mouse report it describes the 2nd postulate which i linked you in my most recent previous post.
but the mouse report explains the all

you have previously been given the mouse report and you questioned the human isolate(koch: 2) so i showed you the link inside the mouse link that tells you about koch 2. but the mouse report explains everything from 1-4

as for koch 3. as you should be able to read by clicking on the link
lung damage:

as for koch 4:

i read your other topic here is another flaw
about evaluating someone deserves 5 hours at level 6(30). but if you have say 8million people deserving 30coin every 12 hours. thats more then the 45mill 12hour limit


the tweak to the evaluation of payment would be that instead of saying he deserves 5 hours of level 6(30) it would be he deserves 1 coin per 12 hour slot for 15 days
where he can accumilate other projects. where you can either extend the end unixtime or the daily amount

this also helps by not saying someone deserves 30 today. and have 8million people deserving 30(240mill) that day which then is more then the 90mill daily creation you limited to(2x45m). but instead you can stagger the payment over time so that 240mill is spread over 24 days and is only a spend of 10mill out of the daily 90mill creation. all without having the bloat of millions of transactions per 12 hours
because they only claim it when they want to spend it

i always like to play around with peoples game theory of their alts, find the flaws and find solutions

so here is a flaw.
rewarding 'deeds' with a daily allowance is just going to fill blockchains up with millions of airdrops daily.
paying out all the daily allowances.
EG
lets imagine there are 45mill participants.
every 12 hours =45mill transactions..
thats alot of bloat data to kickout in one go.

heck even if you spread it over 10minute intervals over the 12 hours
=625,000 transactions every 10 minutes.
thats still 141mb of data a block(625k at 226byte)

sorry but thats still alot of bloat every 10 minutes

another issue is then spending
eg if someone deserves 1 coin per 12 hour. for 100 days.
thats 200 transactions of 1 coin (every 12 hours for 100days) and then when trying to spend them having 200 inputs tagged to a transaction. which would be even more bloat because now tx's aint 226byte but instead 30kb tx, to spend all the 200 coins.

so here is a thought.
have a unix time of when the reward is gifted and when the reward should end. and a value index.
EG instead of this person should get 1 coin per 12 hours and make 200 transactions of that.

set a start time of 0:00 january 10th and an end date of 12:00 april 21st. and an index of 1coin
thus the system can work out thats 200 'slots of 1 coin= 200coin reward when time elapses

that way if someone doesnt spend for 20 days they wont see any transactions. but when its time to spend the system knows its day 20. meaning it knows the person deserves 40coins(20x2) and so by just sending a tx the system 'creates' the 40 coins or rewards the person with 40coin spend. and sets the 'change' utxo as only having 80days left

..
i know it changes the game play of your altcoin. but you have to consider your bloat of sending out 45million tx's per 12 hours if there were 45million users.

yep mistakes that could have been avoided

1. repatriation flights:- he shoulda just paid those abroad to stay abroad. giving time to sort out track and trace for people going to airports before then later doing self isolation for those returning

2. PPE supplies:- get the PPE orders in during januray/february.. not march-may

3. isolating/shielding:- not providing good support for those isolating/sheilding. he relied on councils, who relied on foodbanks. government should have just done a mass stock purchase from grocery store supliers, farmers, etc and sorted good deliveries so that people could healthily isolate without having to go to supermarkets themselves

4. school meals:- just feed the kids. dont make it political

5. nightingale hospitals:- beds and ventilators are not enough. dialisys, ecmo, mobile scanners/xrays should have been sourced too. most of the nightingales are used for those needing to be screened/tested and then passed forward to hospital for real treatment(avoid er overflow). or those leaving hospital but not yet fully fit to go home(avoid wasted normally used for recovery)

6. trains and buses:- rules were too relaxed. he didnt get train companies to put on more carriages to allow spaced out passengers. overcrowding has always been a problem due to lack of carriages and boris let it happen. there are many spare carriages warehoused and not used(train operators profit if they can squeeze more people into less carriages)

7. track and trace. should have been localised where people can run around making mobile phone calls to contact while on foot knocking on doors and putting letters in letterboxes. (also adding the isolation/sheilding checkups that ensure people are staying home)

..
government has no issue with financing bombs when they want to invade a country. but when a virus invades us. he is slow to react.
government pre-plan war/invasions 6months-3years ahead. by recruiting more soldiers and making more vehicles/vessels. yet 9 months after we get invaded by a virus. they way behind

the science/medical side have been very good. but boris is playing juggling balls with the SAGE in one ear and the treasury in the other ear. and he leans more so to the treasury every time

school teachers union. yep teachers themselves that are frontline handling the kids and know best. have been saying keep the schools closed. but boris wanted to open them so kids can go school and parents can go work.
all because he doesnt want to pay out furlough payments.
kids actually learn more googling topics rather than the lengthy old-school teaching methods.
but now sage has made him realise theres too much hospital occupancy thus a lockdown is needed where parents should stay home. obviously they can take care of the kids so he reactively backs down from the keep schools open option

the new strain is of statistical interest. but over all covid only spreads by HUMAN choice to mingle and congregate. there is more evidence that people are ignoring the social distance advice. aswell as the human choices of letting school kids mingle. and shops stay open where people dont keep 2metres in the aisles

the new strain is good for track and trace because they can see how it moves around the country to look at ways of spread via car/train to different counties. but the method of spread is actually human decision
EG they seen it came from spain then wales then london. then expanded alot in london then went everywhere else, showing that it was the welsh having sunny holidays in spain during summer that imported a different strain than what was going around uk in 2019. (shoulda not allowed foreign flights)

becasue the stuff you say has no merit or valid point. so i quickly address the crucial issue of your point to debunk it then i go into the deeper detail surrounding the point that really shows how lame the point is.

such as tvbcof saying vaers only 1% report. i explain the math. i also explain while tvbcof shows 172 pages. those are not 20 patients per page but more like 2. and of the reports alot of them are snowflake whining stuff.

i also address tvbcofs other posts to summarise it all. like how he thinks that (although its been made clear that people will suffer some mild symptoms and thats been made clear all along). he pretends that vaccines have been promoted as 0 symptom just so that he can run a narrative that he found some symptoms.
so i just highlight some of the publicly known symptoms that are widely known to stop his narrative path before he rabbit holes it

then i go and double down and mention what i would deem as true unwanted adverse reactions. just incase. because these too are public knowledge and never been hidden. just so tvbcof cant twist his narative further.

anyway. US has had 4.2m+ that had the vaccine and unless there is say 2% (or your belief of 0.2% covid deaths) death rate in 4 weeks from infection/vaccination. as a comparison.. then the vaccine is better then the virus

so more than 8.2k deaths due to vaccine will make the vaccine worse then the virus.. lets just see

england too
i think its needed if you look at how many are going into hospital. the hospital system is starting to max out. issues with procuring oxygen tanks.

personally i think with the 9 months of covid the government had plenty of time to retrofit triple capacity oxygen storage and also sort out excess supply to pre-empt all this. aswell as sorting out the nightingale temp hospitals with more resource than just ventilators as covid is not just a oxygen deprivation thing. it requires multiple treatments for multiple organs and the nightingales should have been fitted with everthing

trump is going so deep into crazy land and also spending all the RNC funding that he is becoming a republican problem not an asset. im sure to see many republicans back away from being friendly with trump soon.

you were the one saying she didnt go back to work and instead died.
and yet she wrote she went back to work. so its you thats confused.
also again to sort out your confusion she cant write a facebook post while dead. so the ability to write a facebook post shows she was alive

anyway moving on

just reading the first few pages and theres about 1-2 patients per page. so on that record. thats 246 patients.
looking at some of the complaints. its laughable.

but hey if tvbcof does want to exaggerate that vaers only notes 1% of adverse reactions. then ill play his game of 24600 adverse reactions out of more then 4.2mill
so thats still less than 1% reaction rate. even at tvbcofs miscalculation of reporting rate

if tvbcof exaggerated further and said only 0.5% are reported then that would still only be a 1% reaction rate.

but if you read the reactions people had you can still dismiss alot as just crybaby syndrome(snowflake whiners)

so heres some news folks
a vaccine involves a needle so yes expect some arm tenderness pain. doesnt matter what your injected with. needles can still hurt.
a vaccine triggers your immune response so expect immune response. fever/sweats/chills/fatigue. this is normal its showing your body is doing something. as is a mild rash on arm

true adverse effects no one wants but should be looked at are:
anything that lasts more than 3 days
anything that causes breathing or heartrate changes.
dizzyness/feeling weak
headaches(as painful as migraines)
fainting/seizures

this is not new stuff. this is stuff that occurs with may things. the key is that if these persist for 3 days then treat it as an unexpected factor.
the main factor of the adverse reactions are people hypsensitive to allergens

but even with all this advice that has always been public and noted since the beginning. the amount of people suffering from these things is like <1%

she wrote a facebook post after death, first hand. wow thats a new skill
.. or she is alive and well and back at work

she admitted she had many allergies. (first facepalm)
she admitted the hospital she had the jab. was where she also worked and yet she admit they did not follow the advice of the vaccine administration nor the CDC after care/monitoring

she did not have stevens-johnsons. of if she did a very mild (normal rash) not the stuff tvbcofs duckduckgo image search shows
she was back to work in days

do you suffer from a broken finger due to lack of ability to click links
do you suffer from vision damage due to lack of being able to read
do you suffer from mental issues due to not being able to understand/learn/think/remember

the facts are available and the reports are clear. your inablilty to learn/read/check/understand/remember are not the worlds problems. they are your problems

the rest of the world know covid is real. so maybe time you try that little bit harder to learn and a lot less trying to ignore.

incase you do suffer from a sore finger. ill save you a few clicks and scrolls.
in the mouse reports(fourth link in my previous post) it explains all the methodologies of passing koch,rivers and bell. and it also describes where they got the covid isolate from
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017
this then explains how they got the isolate from humans. and yes as you have already played games months ago on this very topic. yes it dues include centrifuges as part of the process

which part were lies?
points she states:
advert:
1. that adverse reactions can be coincidence, error in the administration of the vaccine or rare a problem with the vaccine itself
.. all true. all 3 categories are correct

2. robust safety systems. examine the problem and the data nd promptly address the problem
.. all true.

3. communication with many countries
true
..
summit:
1. dis communication with some countries
true. never said there was perfect communication with ALL countries.

2. risk is always there with vaccines and medicines
true. hense the need to monitor this stuff.

some vaccines are made in countries that are not tied to or linked to un/who/other international groups. and so the international groups cant monitor it. and thats the point she is making.
as for countries that do communicate with wh. they get good feedback and involvement with who to ensure risk decreases

a good example is the fact that allergy risk has always been known. its been stated as a risk. and then when some had allergic reactions. they found it out promptly and re-emphasised the advice on people with allergies. and this happened within days. it was not an unknown vector of allergic risk. it was more of a vector of the local hospitals not reading the instructions and not asking people if they have allergies properly.
(advert point 1: administration of vaccine error)
and now with better emphasis on the instructions of administering vaccines. there are less people having allergic reactions

other things like the PCR test. when a lab has bad results that lab is closed off and deep cleaned and resupplied with fresh reagents and tools. this is why if you look at the 'testing capacity' charts you see sometimes numbers go down for a day or two
again due to monitoring of processes this stuff is found out and dealt with quickly

other things like the vaccine trial when someone had a adverse effect in the trial they halted the trial while they investigated. again swift action.

..
yes some countries make 'knock-off' untested medical treatments and can cause more harm and so thats why the world summit want countries to be more helpful in accepting the support of monitoring systems to increase safety.
just look at all the drug overdose deaths from blackmarket dealers that mix cocaine with nasty stuff
stats of dying from blackmarket bad batches are worse by many magnitudes compared to dying from certified medications(research street corner supplied morphine vs medically prescribed morphine)

long rambling. but Op missing the point

the restrictions did flatten the curve. however the compliance of the restrictions was lax. people didnt follow it accuratetly which meant the flattening took months. then when the restrictions were relaxed. it caused a rise again

the virus does not respond to laws of politics. the virus is spread by people. and if there is restriction advice that says if people avoid invading personal space of 2metres and dont breathe on each other by wearing masks. then there would be no spread.

however those not respecting personal space or wearing masks caused cases. and as restrictions relaxed HUMANS caused more spread. thus being their own worst enemy and the cause of new waves of more cases.
thus tightening up restrictions again

countries that fully closed borders and had better track and trace to ensure sick people or suspected soon to be sick people stayed home. managed to get cases right down promptly

however countries that allowed national/international travel and allowed mingle/socialising in crowds didnt fair well with getting cases down

australia and china and some other asian pacific countries managed to get back to a someone 'normal' living situation. because they done a better effort at flattening the curve.

..
three factors could have changed the restrictions timescales:
1. having more hospital capacity
2. having better track/trace/isolate systems
3. having better/stricker compliance earlier to cut the case numbers faster

in essense it would have been better to have super tight restrictions for 3 months rather than have lax restrictions for 12 months

many aspects come into death rate differences.
age demographic of population.
  EG some african countries with life expectancy is 45 shows that people dont get to the higher risk age of 50+
  meaning less people in the at high risk age to then get affected more by covid. so less deaths due to covid
  US life expectancy is 81. canada is 84 so canada has more elder people(more populous at risk)
  us has 16.95% over 65. canada has 18.98% over 65

social demographic
  EG the french sector like to kiss cheeks and hugs. they are more social than americans.
  people that live with their elderly relatives (ethnic groups suffer from this the most)
  so more transfer in higher loads compared to people that stand at a distance/dont live with elderly

personal space respect and mask usage
  EG some countries disrespect personal space and avoid masks, some respect it. so the case numbers per populous change

hospital care resources
  EG countries low on resources resort to asking families to fill in 'do not resuscitate' orders on the very frail
  where by if people in care homes get sick and have a DNR. they wont be taken to hospital to be intubated
  (people that would not likely recover anyways)

to have suicided himself in such a manner shows he had some mental issues.
many people with mental issues that walk into a coffee shop and buy a coffee wont cause any concern for the barista. so using a barista's account 'he seemed normal' is empty. the barista is not a psychologist nor had hours of reviewing the guy.

what is not important is the delusions of 5g as thats a wide spread paranoia by conspiracy sites promoting to the weak minds. it has no merit or substance and is just a myth spread by cultish people

what is more interesting is the house deed transfers to a woman in california. as that is a weird action outside of the norm.
maybe we will never have answers to the reasons to transfer ownership to a supposed a stranger. but this line of investigating is more interesting than the empty of merit conspiracy rabbit hole of 5g.

you have both been linked it many times before. check your post history and stop pretending to have alzheimer's

heres some quick links that took an entire 43 seconds to find.
hamsters - https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-20774/v1
ferrets- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7144857/
monkeys - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.17.995639v1.full
mice- https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2312-y

and thats just the first 4 links i grabbed on google
there are THOUSANDS of reports about isolating the virus and then putting it into other species to see if they react with the same symptomology.

the fact that there are thousands of reports and also done in different labs and in different countries and via different species and different methodologies rule out any political bias or 'manufacturer bias'
eg you cant say that US CDC planed certain results of countries not tied to CDC got results

if you are still unsure about the wording because you now want to play around with games that its too scientific or too summarised. the links also include details of the scientists that done the isolation. so contact them.
but just stop pretending you have never been linked any reports. that game is over

the 'heart monitoring' as you describe it can be fooled because someone could just turn up at 2 different ocassions claiming to be an identical twin and appear as a heart beat and a single person in the room. passing the robot test.
and then instead of using the right hand thumb as a fingerprint test use their left hand thump to be identified as another person
..
the old fashioned birth certificate system works because it involved witnesses. such as the midwife and the parents signing their witness to the new identity. so generating a privkey via co-signed witnesses should be part of a process. and not just a 'only person in the room' thing