|
1KkLj27QYz2GWsksg64SHR4fa44p8i4TRL
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Block generation has slowed down a lot with my CPU. 2 blocks short of 100 now.
|
|
|
|
|
Enjoying the regular payouts.
Is the range still Sunday to Saturday? Or has it become Monday to Sunday?
|
|
|
|
nC726AfP5aFXcXmsm82ePoqNgh1Pcg2Mmw  |
|
|
|
But when it comes to mining hardware, we get confuse which one we should get. If I put it into the Game Consoles Mindset. I will go for the PS4 and not bother getting a PS3 now.  You will get a PS3 if you want to play GTA5. Thats what a friend of mine did. He sold his PS3 and pre-ordered PS4. Then he realized GTA5 is not on next gen so again bought one PS3  |
|
|
|
|
XPM or PPC or any other future Sunnyking coin. That guy keeps coming up with nice innovations.
|
|
|
|
|
ADAkNQ1uV3g1QDxBuASJgBRH51pAY69w48
thanks
|
|
|
|
|
ZXi8eJT7tJ23EZ3mynN4ZMKo2FFgxnCS3Y
thanks
|
|
|
|
|
QefsEQ7aiGULbcCgNkprNVnvRBP37cGkc4
Thanks
|
|
|
|
I've been mining LiteCoin (LTC) for a while now, and I have noticed that amongst the various Scrypt coins listed on coinwarz.com, there seems to not be a direct correlation between the coins' difficulty, hash rate, and how many coins you can expect per day.
For example, the rate on LTC seems to be that 1 Mhash + 1000 difficulty = 1 LTC per day, nice and simple, but this is not so for other coins.
At my current 4 Megahash mining rate:
LiteCoin at 1032 difficulty gets me 3.89 per day.
Feathercoin at 213 difficulty gets me 75.2 per day.
Bitbar at 2.65 difficulty gets me ONLY 6.45 BTB per day. What the hell?
Novacoin at 282 difficulty gets me only 2.77 per day. WTF?
Digitalcoin at 3.23 difficulty gets me 498 DGC per day.
Bitgem at 0.80 difficulty gets 40 BTG per day.
What is it about these other Scrypt coins that there seems to be such a wide variance? I'd think that a low difficulty = more coins, high difficulty = less coins.
I know that not all coins give the same number of coins per block, but this still seems way out of line.
You need to keep in mind block rewards and block times. FTC is similar block time with 4x rewards so its easy to see. |
|
|
|
y, I think sex coin is a coin and I think I figure out the problem. I will install vc2005 runtime and try again. thanks bro I don't know how I helped, but your welcome? |
|
|
|
who thinks that fonts is gonna dump with all his heavy roller buddies the second they can. he told me so himself on the troll box. I'm just worried to the point I'm thinking of selling my ltc before box acceptance. Idk anymore what to do i am so confused by fucking gox any advice would be appreciated. i think long term ltc should go up, but short term greed may ruin that chance
I doubt if fontas even knows what he's going to do at this point. If it were me, I would probably get out of Litecoin as soon as possible, not because of any one single individual, but because the fundamentals do not support these price levels. You make it sound as if the fundamentals support the price of bitcoin. LTC is worth about 1/10 of btc right now If you believe that then do not dump. Problem solved. |
|
|
|
My life has brightened with the double blessing which sandwiched a mined offering |
|
|
|
|
Some blessings here Qj3FSaN1CFTNCgQhctXHLqnc2LakTJ82wa
|
|
|
|
i never liked this exchange tbh, always looked very dodgy to me...:>
You must be kidding. The owner said its the best alt exchange |
|
|
|
|
The cookie monster will get you.
|
|
|
|
I love being right. Like all the time Like the time when your copy paste coin got killed? |
|
|
|
QUESTION: How do you verify that more shares than are supposed to exist are not floating around?
At least with crypto you can look it up on the blockchain.
Thats a very legitimate concern. When there is a big pump it will quite tempting to not create and sell off a few. Yup and still no one has given an answer to this question. Each share represents 0.001% of all site-generated fees (trading fees, withdraw fees, etc.). There are 100,000 total shares to total 100% of fees. Currently, there are 5,000 in circulation which represents 5% of fees. There will be another batch of 45,000 shares which represents 45% of fees, totaling 50% of fees. The remaining will be the site's owner's to have (the other 50% of generated fees). It is what it is sounds to be: a share of profits generated by fees from the site. Obviously, this means you can't have more than 100%, i.e. 100,000 total shares. That's all nice and dandy, but your number explanation does not answer my question. How does it not? 100,000 * 0.001% = 100% How could there be more than that without RealSolid paying out of pocket? There are payments every 6 hours, of which you can calculate for yourself how much volume there was in that time and what 0.001% of that volume would be (not counting withdraw fees of course). So tell me this, does everyone have public access to all share holders information, total volume of all cryptocoins, depth etc to do the proper calculations to see if indeed the total fees are what they claim to be for the 6 hour period (or whatever the time interval is)? If you (in this case RealSolid) control the output of values of the exchange site (price,depth, volume) that bases its payout to its shareholders based on those same values then you can always game the system unless there is a public audit of his exchange. Likely this will never happen because you would need access to the private data on his server(s) to do the actual TRUE audit.Without all of that information you can't know for sure that he isn't gaming the system by skimming off the top or creating more shares (more likely just adjusting the total true volume traded down so his cut is bigger than normal and the payouts are smaller). Besides, he can simply sell from his 50000 non-releaseable shares. Or even he can sell from the remaining 45000 releasable shares and then when selling those 45000 shares he actually sells, say, 40000 and claim he released 45000. I am not saying he would. Pointing out its very much possible and probably something I would do. |
|
|
|
|
I have been continuously mining from day 1. I have never optimized anything, and just run the qt with setgenerate true. Is there anything I can do to improve?
|
|
|
|
QUESTION: How do you verify that more shares than are supposed to exist are not floating around?
At least with crypto you can look it up on the blockchain.
Thats a very legitimate concern. When there is a big pump it will quite tempting to not create and sell off a few. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
