i think her hope is to plead out. not as a trafficker. but as some stupid employer neglecting her duties by not protecting the girls when accusations were made of sexual harrassment involving epstein

EG like the cases where rape victims in the workplace report it to the boss and the boss ignores it.
she is hoping to be portrayed as the ignorant uninvolved boss

yep its been talked about for years.

there is some interesting stuff in that document. but here is some clarification by comparing the pdf to whats publicly known for years
on pages of like 98-102. maxwells attorneys talk about a detective who claims no knowledge of maxwells actions

yet there are police released video interviews of victims from 2000-2005 that show the victims saying how maxwell approached them and introduced them to epstein, trained them up and such
funny part is whats not said. but hinted in the document is the detective working solely on the case in 2005 and then interviewed by maxwells attorneys had a private 'business' connection with epstein pre-2005
the hint is where it says that epstein hired the detective as a private security guy. and got him to do things like install camera's inside epsteins house
kinda funny that the same detective then doing the search warrent never found the hard drive with the security footage he helped install
also funny how epstein just happen to have disapeared taking ripping the hard drive from the computer before the 'surprise' search warrent..

i just found it weird that the attorneys know there are victim interviews from 2000-2005 naming maxwell as being involved. there are public info of the detective being hired by epstein before 2005
yet the attorneys want to paint a picture that the detective investigating epstein in 2005-6 is an impartial investigator with no knowledge of maxwell. and no pre-existing connection to epstein before 2005.. yet then hint that the detective was involved with epstein when certain details need to be said (facepalm) to many flip flops

i kinda hope the victims attorneys do pick at the holes of maxwells defense, as its kinda just seems like easy pickings to rip maxwells story apart
there is stuff like maxwells attorneys saying how in 2002 VR was not with epstein and maxwell.. but not mentioning is how maxwell and epstein got bored of VR as she 'aged out' and so dropped her as his masseuse and was then paying off her silence by sending her to thailand and paying for her education
they seem very evasive about the details of 2000-2001.. especially about the whole prince andrew incident. pretending they never took her places in 2001 even though there is a picture of VR with andrew and maxwell
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/12/02/20/21568426-0-image-a-15_1575318635649.jpg

is a masseuse
she gets paid to give people massages.. not really what id call a experienced medical doctor nor one with much actual first hand knowledge of virology nor antibody nor any kind of epidemic

but i can now see why she likes to get paid just to touch people
$11 to watch a video on how to touch people.. hmm
pornhub can do a better job cheaper

it was comedy gold reading an article of hers
less than a year ago she wrte an article saying how in 2010 CDC started demanding all people of all ages healthy or the infirm to get their yearly flu shots. and was saying how she expects "That sounds like marching orders, and if you are not careful, you may end up being trampled by the hordes of people flocking to their doctor’s office, a pharmacy, a senior center or even grocery store to be inoculated and sent on their merry way."

funny part is when she wrote that in 2019 .. she obviously had 9 years of post knowledge to know that there was no trampling, hordes, flocks.. but even after 9 years of no evidence of any marching orders. she still wanted to make a scary illusion that its whats happening

anyway. she was never a ER doctor stitching up patients. she was a office dwelling back rubber. getting paid to go to meetings and conferences

idiot above continues to be an idiot

he cant even describe what an exosome does or how its created or any detail
he ran out of scripts. so just repeats the stupidity that everything must be an exosome

thats like someone that is colour blind that can only see grey. they will scream forever that the world is grey. even when people inform him the world is not grey but that its his limited view on life limits his understanding of colour

point of smart contracts is to have a actual contract unbreakable due to it being blockchain secured

yet jetcash is thinking of services that just accept cryptocurrency as payment for a domain(domain agents).

what jetcash doesnt realise is that even if you buy domains from go-daddy using crypto and imagine go-daddy had a blockchain instead of a database for its registry. they are just agents for ICANN where ICANN hold the ultimate list. ICANN can still revoke go-daddy from being a domain registrar service,whereby icann then just carry on using its normal database as it has always done

thus a true smart contract that is unbreakable has to apply to the top. not the middlemen

1. its a loan not a grant(but yea they can declare bankruptcy maybe later on)
2. kodak are not making vaccines.

3. funny how you think that this LOAN money is needed fr small businesses. when small businesses have had access to loans since march

4. funny how you care less about health and care more about business/economy.
sounds like you are a tax loving conservative that doesnt want money spent on healthcare and instead handed to business owners.

is your current mindset the same mindset you had since a few years ago. or one thats been spoonfed to you by the conspiracy sites that pretend to be all about caring/health. while instead sounding more capitalist eugenic in their preferences
EG this is what you sound like
if your healthy go lick a sick person and get sick, dont go to a doctor for any treatment, instead buy stock in some random business to boost the economy and then pay your taxes for the benefit of the businesses

exosomes are not viruses
atleast learn basics

if you think ebola(knotted rope) looks like a exosome your an idiot
if you think corona (spikey ball) looks like an exosome(golfball(empty) or toffee apple(with nutrient attached)) your an idiot

funny part is badecker is the type of idiot that will also say a female ova is also a exosome and then start saying lots of things are exosomes..
without even understanding what an exosome does and doesnt do

last funny part is badecker is weirdly obsessed with advertising only one type of microscope. not realising that there are many types of microscopy. many ways to identify things. but nah. badecker is having some weird brand loyalty and promoting just one. because thats what his conspiracy sites are advertising

funy part about badecker
is he shows an image of a exosome and even links quotes that its below 100nm average
exosomes are more golfballs shape that attach nutrients. to the outside

corona virus is more spikey ball that hook onto cells to penetrate the cell..
meaning they do different things

a exosome does not hook to a cell. instead it covers itself in nutrient and the nutrient is the thing that a particular nutrient seeking cell receptor likes and sucks inside.

its like the difference between a virus being puzzle piece and a exosome being a toffee apple

also corona and ebola are not only different shapes but also different sizes with both being more then the average size of an exosome.


again badecker is trying to compare toffee apples to spikey dogtoys

its all been said before
the links actually show the processes and lab equipment, and methodology. they even link picture of the test specimens they tested it on afterwards

your inability to remember and your inability to click the links and check the references is your problem
and before you even start. because i know your routine already
it passed koch
it passed rivers
and to pre-empt your routine of moving goalpost
it passed bell

well i called you an idiot that was telling people stupid things that would risk their health months ago.
your memory makes you think what i just said is new.
i called you out months ago. but atleast finally we can see you admitting your intentions

and badecker is too dumb to see a group of people want to charge $11 to teach people how to hug another person

badecker really loves advertising scammers that overcharge for stupid crap

badecker sounds like a eugenics guy
here is badeckers thought process
"avoid hospitals"
"drink bleach"
"get a gun and be prepared to fight"
"lick random people to get sickness in huge viral loads"
"drink more bleach"
"join the army and get shot"

seems badecker wants people to die

even with your own warped imagination
you just debunked yourself
we are in 2020
meaning even under your warped imagination they have been able to identify viruses for atleast 9 years even in your own words
(reality is it was 1930's they had visual confirmation of viruses.. but lets stick with your imaginary number as it still debunks you)

so now you can stop pretending no one can identify a virus

i think its you that need to do the research
and stop thinking it the 1800's and you still thinking you have to wait out 200 years of your stupidly thought up immortality before you get to learn the truth

wake up its already 2020.. no more excuses to keep waiting. do the research now. on present things happening now.. stop going back to the past to find excuses to be an idiot

by the way..
in the 1800's (badeckers favourite era) the average life expectancy was ~35
so while badecker thinks that modern medicine is killing people. the actual fact is that peoples health are improving and people are lasting longer because when they get sick they can get treatments for more things than in the 1800

if you know your vulnerable to certain things for certain reasons. then take precautions. stop acting like your an immortal idiot where you think the only thing that can kill you is a doctor

here is a reality check.. i know badecker thinks because of alot of people die in hospital. that it must be the hospital that is the killer its not
its the sickness that made the person want to go to hospital. the sickness kills the person. the hospital is just there to improve the odds of survival if they have the right treatment to offer
having no treatment does not mean the hospital killed them. it just means the sickness killed the person because there is no treatment.

without any hospitals at all.. more would die.
having overrun hospitals because too many sick and not enough beds,, nurses and doctors to spare can cause more deaths.. because then people are not getting any treatment

as for 'big pharma'
treatments are needed. to help improve the odds of surviving and recovering from things that are fatal without treatment.
yes big pharma know this and although they do benefit the sick by improving their survival odds, they charge a huge price.
yes the 'pharma' industry should be nationalised as a not for profit where by their budgets are actually controlled and not wasted.. but pretending that big pharma and hospitals are voodoo and placebo's is just stupid

and i still laugh how idiots will find any excuse to continue being idiots

badecker read on some stupid site that we are in the 18th century and there is no way to identify anything smaller than the human eyesight. and the only chemical reactions that are possible are using herbs

he hassnt wised up that we are in the 2st century
he kinda knows, but then lets the dumb part of his brain forget again, that they can actually identify not only visually via a microscope, but also through chemical reaction, extraction, sequencing and comparison. and work out whats similar and whats different

they have the rna sequence of corona viruses and they know it differs to ebola or bacteria
they can see that the same sequence is found in people that are sick with a certain symptomology but not find it in healthy people
they can see that the pathogen they find in ebola symptomology differs from those with covid symptomology

they have extracted purified and then put it into test specimens and those test specimens also got sick with the particular symptomology. so they do know what they are looking at is the cause of the sickness

then looking at it and looking at the rna sequence and other enzyme studies they know its not an exosome
heck exosomes dont even do the same job that a virus does
people can keep teaching badecker this stuff.. but he will always forget as soon as he clicks the bookmark to his hotlist of conspiracy sites. because he is an idiot that way.

'firepit' discussions are good when they have a realistic topic. that is worthy of discussion
but your silly little conspiracy topics this year wont get you much discussion that will end in positive results

but yea
lesson to learn
dont leave fish out to grow bacteria for the day.. or by the time it gets dark you will have issues

im still surprised how you think the fact that its blue. dismisses the stupidity of leaving it out to gather bacteria
i dont think you grasp the whole subtle point about keep it chilled and then only take it out when you want to cook it. and then cook it well
oh and basic thing. if it smells dont even touch it

the money in the bank is not yours. its the banks. if they have a theft or a bankrun or they just shift their value abroad and close shop. oh well
this is why the government has insurances. where the government then has to repay losses.
yep banks can run away with peoples money(2007 crisis) and get away with it. because their terms and conditions are that they tell you how much you can withdraw and how much 'they owe you' and they can close business and keep it because their terms say when you lose ask the government to pay out on the insurance provision.

most of the time for longevity and good customer service/reputation. the bank will act like you have control of the funds. but banks have many clauses as to why they can freeze accounts and not give you the money.

thats why checking terms of service is important
the contract between you and a bank is the terms of agreement of who owns what property. the contract/terms can actually be designed that the bank is either
just a manager where you the full funds owner
or
that you hand them the funds and they allow you access to their service within the limitations of their rules. where breaching the rules means loss of access to the funds
yes they can then add in customer friendly sub clauses of methods to regain access.. but its worth reading any terms f service and stop pretending that by default you will always have property rights
especially if the only 'proof' you have value. is in the databases of a service that can just delete the database

again this is why many customers want banks to follow certain regulations such as bcking up their records and having regular reporting. to safeguard customers from those potentials
and yep thats why in the unregulated world of bitcoin 2012-2014 people have to be careful when dealing with unregulated exchanges that have dodgy terms, no insurance, no regulations no customer protections

here is the many funny parts of jetcash

if jetcash thinks covid doesnt kill.. then what is he trying to get immunised naturally against
EG bird poo on a car that never invades a person. will never cause a person harm.. right
so if jetcash is analogising that covid is birdpoo on a car that doesnt harm someone. then why is he saying tht people need to start licking birdpoo all of a sudden
if a think is of no harm, then there is no threat. and nothing to get 'immunised against'
meaning even if he licked birdpoo. it changes nothing. so why suggest people do it.

if there is a vaccine. is jetcash thinking he will be exempt from having a voluntary vaccine because he THINKS he already had covid
nah

in the UK there has never been any forced vaccination. you can actual just say no very easily
no one comes knocking at your door with a needing in their hand

as for advising people to hug other people.. thats a stupid way that will cause high dose viral load transfer.
you would actually be better to promote the social distance 2metre low dose low risk method

EG dont lick birdpoo. but if you get a little bit on your hand when opening your car door and then a smaller amount in your mouth when you suck your thump crying like a baby. its not as bad as licking a car roof full of birdpoo. you probably wont even taste it the small speckles of birdpoo from respectful common sense normal behaviour

its like jetcash wants to say best way to win a battle is not have training to fight but just go onto a angry cult/terrorist groups land and get attacked by thousands of people

smarter thing is to not poke a battle and if a few terrorists get into your personal space. then you have less of a battle to fight. thus less risk on yourself

so jetcash. atleast use logic and science and math and biology.
because all i see is that you are fused to websites that produce myths about house raids with syringe firing weapons are/will occur
and then asking the population to bomb that militia and drink their blood to be safe naturally
and then wearing their blood as a sign that you should not be raided next time they come to your house
sorry reality does not work like that

saying 'i dont need a vaccine because i hugged a sick person last month' is not
ill emphasise this .. its not the 'because i hugged someone lastmonth' .. its the voluntary part of just saying 'i dont need a vaccine' that will be why you wont have to have a vaccine

i can promise you this. no one will appear at your door to inject you.
if you dont want a vaccine. just dont have one.. simple

now that you have been told you can simply say 'i dont want one'
now learn to respect other peoples personal space because they may not want any sickness you are ignorantly going to pass to them. so stop trying to hug random strangers.

integrating ICANN to be a blockchain is something only ICANN can implement

however. bitdns has had a blockchain for many years now
however the addresses can only be resolved to a specific host if you direct your broswer to use the bitdns as a dns service

meaning you cant just hold ICANN listed .orgs hostage using the normal native dns system.. but you can create your own TLD (toplevel domains) and listings on bitDNS and anyone using bitDNS compatible browsers can then see them sites contents when they type in those addresses

but in short.
unless you have control over ICANN you wont get far. even an native internet ISP offering a 'smartcontract' is not a true binding contract. thats fixed to a database forever. ican can just overrule native ISP access

1. go on say let me see you say it just one more time .. ira's legal request in a legal document linked to ocal case has no relevance to the case..
oh wait i just quoted you saying its not an issue above. maybe you need to snap ut of the cycle of calling legal documented requests irrelevant to a legal case. kinda weird you cant.

2. flip
"could be part of a back settlement"
"who knows"
"still a long way aways from settlement talk"
flop
"i thought"
"ira was trying to claim damages"

3. really concentrate on your flip flop of point 2
then read ira's request where he is not requesting who should buy out who. he is only requesting the partnership to be legitimised as fact by court order/judgement
heck even who pays who of just the legal cost damage is undecided.

all your other rambling for multiple pages now has nothing to do with the documents but everything to do with your 'could be' scenarios many be your thoughts and speculation roulette game flip flops

however.. we all know and is in documented proof. that ira is asking the judge for the exact thing CSW would also like so he can do his SLAPP's
remember this point clearly
ira asking for something that benefits CSW is not an IF. as its clearly in the document as a legal request by ira to the judge


maybe stick to the words of the document.. oh wait i said that many many many pages ago and you dont more time wasting making endless posts of excuses why you shouldnt read the documents. that are DIRECTLY CONCERNING the case

as for your other ramblings
thats just comedy

to reply to the below
yep as always juan being ignorant of the actual requests made in the legal case
then juan pretends that any mention of anything in the legal case is 'comprehensible'
thus more reason for him to be ignorant to the details of the case
starting to wonder why was he crying that people should not play roulette. when it was him and his friends that were playing roulette