nobody has ANY proof so what are you really about ? whats your deal here because i can't understand what your trying to do here It's pretty self-explanatory, you are a newbie who has insisted on requesting for no collateral loans even when you have zero reputation (now it's negative) in the forum. You haven't died from the time your first no collateral loan was rejected, which means you don't actually need a loan, but you are just looking for someone to scam. What makes you keep coming back even when you know you won't get the loan? if you don't give me a chance then explain me how i can proof to this forum i'm no scammer
Because once you give a scammer a chance, you get scammed. |
|
|
|
In the experience of duckdice in the past few days, a total of 3 deposits are very smooth without mistakes. Generally, it will arrive in 1 minute! But when withdrawing money, it may be a long wait, maybe a few hours, a few days, or a few weeks. It is said that who will take a few weeks to withdraw money? The first time I asked the customer service to reply to the question, and the second time I asked the customer service, I would not reply to you at all. No matter what the situation is, I really can't convince anyone. I feel that duckdice was already going downhill when he didn't climb up
And how is the duckdice issue connected to Duelbits? This is a Duelbits thread. If you have any complaints to do with another casino then I suggest to write them on the respective thread. This is a duck dice thread ✅ DuckDice.io 🎲 Rakeback 🎲 Races 🎲 Faucet 🎲 Deposit Bonus 🎲 Jackpot 🎲And from the look of things, it seems not everything you are saying here is honest |
|
|
|
i have good account on pokerstars good chest bonus every week i get bonusses good deposit ratio
also if you need docs to make those accounts contact me
But for some reason you are always broke and seeking for ways of scamming anyone who is not alert here through your endless no-collateral loan request. |
|
|
|
This season, they seem to have always struggled against low table teams, so I won't be surprised if it's a draw or loss. The la Liga is Barcelona's to lose this season. Real Madrid should start thinking about making vital signings next summer.
It's quite sickening that most of the attacks have to pass through the left flank while the right side is almost empty. Shut Vinicius down, and suddenly Real Madrid is struggling.
I am 100% sure that in the summer Real will solve the problem with the attack. They would have already solved it last summer if the bastard Mbappe was honest in his intentions (Real refused Haaland only because it was confident in Mbappe). By the way, interesting quotes for the game Athletic - Barcelona: 3.55 - 3.35 - 2.16 It doesn't matter anymore but it looks like Barcelona will lose points - the double chance for Athletic is the clear favorite according to the bookies. 10 minutes into the game and Real Madrid were already trailing to a visiting Espanyol  . Just like I thought, this is going to be another long match where Real Madrid tries to at least draw. Good news is that Vini equalized for now. It doesn't matter if Barcelona get a couple of bad games, Real Madrid will keep losing points as well and stay second, but Athletic club vs Barcelona is a huge one to keep an eye on. |
|
|
|
But this is not happening in Russia alone, even in countries like Japan, there have been reports of a decline in birth rate while the molarity rate keeps going up (in fact at the moment, it's above the birth rate) Japan has not been in a war, so why is the population declining? Japan’s Population Crisis Nears Point of No Return |
|
|
|
The misinformation in this thread is quite alarming You guys, do you even know what a drug is? Or you think that only cocaine or marijuana are drugs? Here, let me help you; noun
a medicine or other substance which has a physiological effect when ingested or otherwise introduced into the body. Source - https://languages.oup.com/google-dictionary-en/So whether you want it or not, we all take drugs one way or the other and obviously most drugs are also advantageous in fighting disease, including marijuana extracts. |
|
|
|
It used to be a good exchange back then, but i don't think my opinion about them is the same, especially after forcing me to undergo facial verification every time I wanted to withdraw my funds urgently on an account that is fully KYC verified. Be very careful withdrawing from that exchange, especially if your device does not have a good camera or no camera at all. Your funds will be stuck there until you verify your face  It also turns out that I was not the only victim. Bybit now forcing users to carry out Facial recognition when withdrawing. |
|
|
|
So to update. They let me withdraw in the end so I have my funds back.
But they asked a lot of weird questions on the KYC video call. Even asked to log into my wallet whilst on live share screen?
Standard practice by most casinos that are AML complaint lately. The good news is that they let you withdraw your money minus the stressful wagering requirement, which was quite a worry since the bet limit was so small compared to your account size. |
|
|
|
I don’t know how this game can be decisive, given the fact that the chances of a La Liga title are practically non-existent. But due to the large margin of safety before the game with Liverpool, it seems to me that Real will play for their own pleasure and therefore they will win without problems (with or without Benzema), after all, the overall class of Real is clearly higher.
This season, they seem to have always struggled against low table teams, so I won't be surprised if it's a draw or loss. The la Liga is Barcelona's to lose this season. Real Madrid should start thinking about making vital signings next summer. It's quite sickening that most of the attacks have to pass through the left flank while the right side is almost empty. Shut Vinicius down, and suddenly Real Madrid is struggling. |
|
|
|
Logical approach. So many people seem to think that everything needs to be fully private and anonymous or there's no privacy.
But it's the truth. There's no in between. It's either private/anonymous or not. I really wonder what happens when someone transfers "dirty' coins through the tool because one time they will. Do they block the funds? Raise an alarm to the feds that. "Hey folks! Here is an address with dirty coins!" |
|
|
|
Aside from Kyc needing to be done, the user only wagered 1k out of the 12k he deposited. Nearly all casinos require you wager your deposited amount at least 1x before you're able to withdrawal. So even if he passes kyc and is good to go, they will likely require him to wager 11k more before he can wd.
To be fair, OP did try to wager $5K more, only to be limited to $200 as the max he could stake. I think this is what pissed him off to withdraw all his funds from the casino. I myself wouldn't want to wager small amounts $200 in so many matches just to meet the wagering limit, yet I have about $12K in my account. |
|
|
|
Somebody give me more catch-up 🤣
You have a point but as you said there are still no concert evidence even if there were, still we need to find other things like if they cheated to any campaign and things like that. In the year 2023, 6 years fast forward form anything that might happened, are we still tagging accounts just for changing hand?
So what exactly is the problem here? I was trying to show @_BlackStar that the address he may have quoted was posted after change of activity. Did I suggest anywhere that @bitzizzix should be tagged? Take a breather. |
|
|
|
If the account you suspect did change hand, then I don't think he would still have that old bitcoin wallet to use today. New Wallets: bc1qfr7klaf70avypgvh2q9v8lv4aa2802n9hcvcju BTC addy : bc1qfr7klaf70avypgvh2q9v8lv4aa2802n9hcvcju Old Wallet: 1AUr5FyZJvEL8eV97moDV16WnLQDTUX5Xj BTC address : 1AUr5FyZJvEL8eV97moDV16WnLQDTUX5Xj 29th August 2017 was way after the change in account activity which happened around 1st April 2017, so I wouldn't be suprised if the Bitcoin address posted after 1st April 2017 is still in control of the current owner. bitzizzix started its newbie activity on the local Russian board, but it only numbered 14 posts as noted here, while he doesn't have any single posts in the Indonesia board after I searched for it. By 26th November 2017, the account has already attained Senior Member rank There is a very high chance so many posts especially Russian board related posts were deleted before the archive third party sites were created But since there is no concrete evidence pinning bitzizzix, I think we should let this pass |
|
|
|
Now, Chelsea already leads with 2 goals, the aggregate 2-1 for Chelsea.  I am surprised that Chelsea played well so far, they seem to be more motivated to qualify for the next stage in UCL. They dominate the match and they become very offensive. If they can keep this good game, no doubt Chelsea to play in the next round. They are playing at home now, they have a bigger chance to qualify. By the way, Chelsea already made 12 shot attempts, 4 shots on target. While Dortmund only made 5 shot attempts, only 1 shot on target. It is very clear that Chelsea is more superior in this match. Despite playing so well, They haven't yet killed off the game. 1 Goal from Borussia Dortmund and they are off to Extra time and possible penalties. I guess Graham Potter will stay a little longer after tonight's performance, but we all know he is not completely secure in the long run |
|
|
|
To be honest, wondering about the recent games we saw from Liverpool and how Klopp was under pressure I wasn't expecting to see Liverpool even performing this well against Manchester United especially if you know Manchester could show a good performance against many strong teams like Barcelona a few weeks ago but the way they played this game just shocked me when I saw Liverpool scored six goals just in the second half.
Forget about Barcelona, Liverpool vs Manchester United is one of the biggest matches and rivalries between the 2 most successful teams in the Premier League team, so, I am not surprised by the outcome especially by the fact that Liverpool was at Anfield. Manchester United should revisit their football tactics. Liverpool completely shut them down. |
|
|
|
i just launched one bounty Compaign and red flags has very bad impact on this. if i escrow fund (token or busd) , People will not still believe because this negative flag showing at the very top that Op is scammer.
Well, you might be one… Who knows? The account could have been hacked, bought/sold. Who knows what the new owner might be up to. The projects thinking of dealing without should have a chance of thinking they might be dealing with a scammer because of the red flags she/he has shown so far.  |
|
|
|
Why now? Because you now want to join bounties and signature campaigns? Account selling is not against the forum rules but that does not mean that the DT members won't tag you and the reasons are pretty valid. Accounts sales encourage: 1. Scam 2. Spam and account farming 3. Account thief/hacking How sure are we that the new owner of the account will be as trustworthy as the old user? |
|
|
|
Maybe there will be some investors willing to test that waters and buying this AI generated NFT. But we all know that it defeats the whole purpose of NFT as this is supposedly made by artist themselves. But since AI is everywhere now specially the way they draw and crafted art that is perfect to the eyes, Binance might be the one destroying this sector? Yeah, I agree, sooner or later, this "real" artist will have to find another way to make some money out of our crypto industry. So good job Binance, <insert sarcasm here>.
True, this will lead to complete death of creativity. For example, I have just created this image in 20 seconds using a random an AI art generator i got through Google, and it isn't even premium. Just a simple idea I thought about quickly and all I told the AI to draw me was a pic of an elephant on the moon  Being an Artist by talent, I know how it feels for all other genuine content creators out there. |
|
|
|
Common knowledge says that a blockchain network doesn't rely on a central authority and doesn't have a single failure. Not all blockchains are decentralized. Decentralization is just a major feature of a few blockchains like Bitcoin. However, we observe blockchain-solutions which fail on a regular basis due to various reasons. The notorious example here is Solana.
What is wrong here? Is it true that blockchain networks are failure resistant? What do you expect from a coin that uses proof of Stake that is far from decentralization and very prone to manipulation? Or, alternatively, is it true that we misclassify some blockchain-solutions and put a wrong label on a product? What is your opinion?
It's quite evident that people are easily misled into anything due to stupid hype. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
