Для дальнейшего понимания, у глобальных модераторов есть доступ абсолютно ко всему, что происходит на этом форуме (включая личную переписку), так что не стоит расслабляться  У глобалов нет доступа даже к айпишникам, с какого перепуга у них появился доступ к личным перепискам? Репорты на личные сообщения отправляются админам, а не глобалам. Значит и доступ только у них. Совсем недавно отправлял жалобу на ПМ с фишиговой ссылкой и видел там такое:  Насколько я понимаю что трое из подчеркнутых являются глобальными модераторами но никак не админами. И в случае отправки жалобы они получают доступ к ПМ. |
|
|
|
casinos are designed in that way for one major reason - to earn and gain money from the gamblers! what else? so they will offer basically everything just to make them stay. the longer they stay, the more money coming in for them. also we dont need to decode these physical casinos, i think everyone knows that already. it is no secret in the gambling world. so it is all up to you if you want to be eaten by their system
Absolutely correct. Now where we have not come everything is done so that we spend as much money as possible. In stores, products are specially arranged so as to make us want to buy more. In a variety of leisure activities offer many related products and services. And so on. Therefore, the casino does not look unusual against the General background. They also try to make sure that we leave as much money there as possible and still want to come again. |
|
|
|
They specified an invalid SHA512 algorithm instead of SHA256.
This looks like a typo. Although it does not do honor to such a site.
I rechecked the hash with the SHA256 algorithm and it is really correct:
Based on your check, it was clear that the hash with the SHA256 algorithm is correct, so the @OP should understand now, and he won't have a problem now. I think it is normal to see a typo on a website because it's happening on many websites out there, not just on one website. And the good news here is he gets a $5 bonus from the site because he shows a typo on their website. I think the gambling website which has a reputation will not do something or cheat people, and if someone can show the bugs or typo or something like that, the site will give a bonus for that person. Yeah, I mean... You can't imagine what I felt when the hash didn't match when performing the verification... I mean this is very serious for their reputation... If they can't maintain updated one of the most important sections of their site, can you imagine their security? anti-hack? their programming? wow, a lot to think. Think twice before depositing your crypto there.
By the way, the fact They treated me like a kid or a beggar asking for pennies with that $5 bonus is disrespectful, I was gambling MUCH more than that... Crazy, BIG thumbs down for that fallacious, misleading and shady site.
Perhaps, you can play on the other website and get a new experience from playing on the other gambling website. Somehow, I agree with your say that we need to think twice before depositing our crypto. It is unpleasant to see a typo on a serious site. It is even more unpleasant if this typo makes you nervous. However, as we saw, the site can't be called a Scam and the hash they have matched. Perhaps they should have paid more substantial compensation for the error found and the disturbance caused. It's on their conscience. |
|
|
|
Okay, the issue happened with PrimeDice, it is very popular, The amount I lost is actually small it's like 0.4BTC and 2ETH... But here are the details of the issue This is the server seed and the hashed server seed of my bets  Their provably fair statement said they were using SHA512 to hash the server seed.  This is the hashed result using a SHA512 calculator  As you can see the hash doesn't match... I contacted the support demanding an explanation, this is what they answered:  Basically they told me it was just a typo issue, they gave me a $5 bonus "for letting them know about the mistake". I just don't understand how they claim to be the #1 Bitcoin gambling site and making these kinds of mistakes in such an important section of their website... That's shady for me, and I definitely will never gamble there again. They specified an invalid SHA512 algorithm instead of SHA256. This looks like a typo. Although it does not do honor to such a site. I rechecked the hash with the SHA256 algorithm and it is really correct:  |
|
|
|
It is still advantage for the casino, the more people get drunk, the more clouded their decisions are, and most likely will go all in or bet even more because of all the alcohol in their minds, win-win situation. And if ever they got unruly or something, it's simply, they are going to be thrown out of the casinos.
There are a lot of enforcers roaming around, and don't forget the eye in the sky, they can simply tell the people downstairs to watch for someone because he is drunk. Seen this before, just for a sign that someone is under the influence already, expect the 2-3 enforcers on that guy ready to pounce him if he went over board.
Since I always plan the amount that I am ready to lose, I do not mind losing it, and therefore I can afford to drink even strong drinks, because I pay for them with my losses. However, I have not yet seen someone carried out under the arms in the casino because this person was very drunk. Of course, houses give out free drinks for a specific purpose, but they do not do it so that you lose control of yourself, you in most cases and so give them your money. You'll just enjoy it))) |
|
|
|
•The reason there are no clocks and windows at casinos are because they don't want to let the users leave !Plus they often give free drinks to make your judgement bad and lavender of ofc Making you drowsy .
It's illegal for drunk people to gamble in most places. Any casino caught intoxicating its customers would be shut down quick and earn a bad rep. All the casinos I've been to have given out free alcoholic beverages to all patrons as long as you gamble. Of course, people who were in an inadequate state due to alcohol were not there. However, a lot of people had with burning eyes from alcohol) |
|
|
|
I think it is not equivalent to compare people who infect others with HIV and coronavirus Well, I'm not sure that you read my post carefully enough To repeat, if you are infected (I mean the coronavirus here), have been diagnosed with the disease and asked to stay home but you still go out and some people actually die because of you, it can already be legally qualified at least as a "criminally negligent homicide" or "involuntary manslaughter". So it doesn't matter if the death rate from HIV is higher as you already have blood on your hands (this is a crucial point which you seem to have missed) When establishing a cause-and-effect relationship, it is very easy to determine who infected HIV What makes you think so, given that it takes years, sometimes even decades, till the symptoms start to develop? You said eqrlier that some people use needles or cut with blades smeared with their infected blood. It's hard not to notice. And how to determine that a person was infected with the virus by Vasya, and not John? You better ask those who came up with this law Do you happen to remember a reference to this law? And how else to deal with such a moment. If a person is put in quarantine at home, but they need to eat and feed their children, go to the store, pay bills. How can he do this if he is forbidden to leave the house? As I suspect, in these circumstances such people end up being sent to "concentration camps": ~ I guess being quarantined at home is a better option And it is better that there was neither one nor the other and we were all healthy. And they could afford to go to Las Vegas and play at the casino. |
|
|
|
I think it is not equivalent to compare people who infect others with HIV and coronavirus Well, I'm not sure that you read my post carefully enough To repeat, if you are infected (I mean the coronavirus here), have been diagnosed with the disease and asked to stay home but you still go out and some people actually die because of you, it can already be legally qualified at least as a "criminally negligent homicide" or "involuntary manslaughter". So it doesn't matter if the death rate from HIV is higher as you already have blood on your hands (this is a crucial point which you seem to have missed) When establishing a cause-and-effect relationship, it is very easy to determine who infected HIV and why a person died. And how to determine that a person was infected with the virus by Vasya, and not John? And how else to deal with such a moment. If a person is put in quarantine at home, but they need to eat and feed their children, go to the store, pay bills. How can he do this if he is forbidden to leave the house? |
|
|
|
I would not be surprised if soon in some countries there will be a criminal article for intentionally infecting other people with coronavirus.
At the moment, in many countries, violation of the quarantine regime is punished only by fines.
That can happen if people do not follow what the government suggests because once they make a contact body with other people without any social distancing, that can give a chance for the virus to spreads to other people. If there is any violation of the quarantine or new normal in the future, there will be another punishment besides fines. Maybe people need to do a social activity or even get in the hospital with full quarantine. I think the criminal penalty is too severe for people who violate the quarantine. The fine is enough. I guess this has been the case since HIV started spreading
I've heard stories of the HIV-positive people deliberately trying to infect other people by pricking them with needles in public places. Regarding coronavirus, willfully avoiding quarantine when infected is already a criminal offence in Russia. And if your reckless behavior led to deaths of other people, you can get up to 7 years in jail. People should be more responsible and take care not only of themselves but of other people too, which is an expected behavior in any culture
I think it is not equivalent to compare people who infect others with HIV and coronavirus. First, it is much more difficult for a person to infect another person with HIV than with a coronavirus. To do this, you need to perform clearly deliberate actions. Second, the death rate from HIV is much higher, and infection with the human immunodeficiency virus in most cases can be compared to premeditated murder. People with HIV can walk the streets, go to the store, go to Las Vegas and they will not infect anyone. A person with coronavirus only needs to sneeze in a public place to infect others, but they can sneeze without intending to infect others. This is a significant difference. As I recall, you understand the law, and you understand the difference better. |
|
|
|
So I was going through YouTube and got suggested a video , I decided to watch it and thought I would share it with you guys. This video actually showed me why online ones are better.
I will try and sum up everything in my words , plus try and watch the video if you guys have time.
~
You should consider the casino not as a place to earn money, but as a place where you can spend money and have a good time. You don't expect to hit the jackpot in a bar after a few beers. So in the casino you need to go with the amount of money that you expect to spend. If you win at the same time - be happy. Lose - remember why you went there. |
|
|
|
If people know that they are sick and can infect other people, then of course they should be conscious and not go out. There is no question of their going to Las Vegas. In some cases, this could be interpreted as deliberately infecting other people.
Indeed, sick people must stay at home and don't go outside. That's how we call physical distancing to prevent others infected by sick people. I assume all sick people have understood the risks to transmit/spread the virus to others if they go outside. So, it is true that once they go outside, even go to Las Vegas Casinos, it means they intentionally transmit it to others. >Well, there should be a strict security check before the visitors go inside the casinos to prevent this danger. I just heard in the news now that in the Philippines, one person who is already on quarantine was able to slip out and go to the island of Boracay, which is a very popular beach island in the country. So this woman went to the tourist island and then left the next day and went back to the place where she is quarantined. Now talking about people who are deliberately infecting others, I would say this is one example of those people who wants to get even with life and wants to spread the virus to others. News is she will be sued by government for violating quarantine protocols. I would not be surprised if soon in some countries there will be a criminal article for intentionally infecting other people with coronavirus. At the moment, in many countries, violation of the quarantine regime is punished only by fines. |
|
|
|
Открыл shitcoins.club с IP из Беларуси. Показываются банкоматы во всех странах Европы где они есть:
Я только что попробовал из Италии, и только итальянский банкомат показывают. Я знаю по румынской доске, что им показывают только банкоматы в их стране. Поэтому, вероятно, они используют какое-то ограничение на основе IP-адреса для стран внутри ЕС. Скорее всего так и есть. Если в стране есть их банкоматы, то они показывают их. Если банкоматов нет - показывают все страны где есть. Вам легко проверить зайдите на сайт с другого IP не из вашей страны. Я правильно перевожу это: "скрыть лицо во время транзакции"? Значит банкомат сканирует лица покупателей даже если они покупают Биткоин на маленькие суммы?
Мне бы не понравилось покупать в таких банкоматах в этом случае.
Что касается покрытия лица, вы правы, но, как вы видите из приведенных выше сообщений, а не программное обеспечение для распознавания лиц, сканирующее ваше изображение, это оператор старой школы, пропускающий операции по предотвращению вандализма. Я думаю, что их объяснение здесь искреннее, поскольку у них нет возможности собирать и регистрировать так много лиц по всему местонахождению их банкоматов. Даже если бы у них была такая возможность, они вряд ли захотят, учитывая их послужной список в политиках KYC / AML. Если они видят что ваше лицо закрыто могут потребовать предоставить удостоверение личности: In special cases, such as attempts to cover your face during transaction, we reserve the right to require you to scan your identity card even for smaller amounts.
Это вы цитировали ранее. Значит им важно получить либо фото лица либо документ. И тут скорее всего дело не в вандализме, а в идентификации покупателя. |
|
|
|
If people know that they are sick and can infect other people, then of course they should be conscious and not go out. There is no question of their going to Las Vegas. In some cases, this could be interpreted as deliberately infecting other people.
Indeed, sick people must stay at home and don't go outside. That's how we call physical distancing to prevent others infected by sick people. I assume all sick people have understood the risks to transmit/spread the virus to others if they go outside. So, it is true that once they go outside, even go to Las Vegas Casinos, it means they intentionally transmit it to others. >Well, there should be a strict security check before the visitors go inside the casinos to prevent this danger. Now many public places can not be entered without measuring the temperature. I doubt that someone ill will decide to fly to the casino to be turned around at the entrance. I think is better to avoid the greater risk. In this case, it is a pandemic that is clear enough for every body to adjust and you can't see people adjusting like that without an order. Moreover, economy is beginning to open up again, it is the living that will continue from where it was paused from, this is the point. No need for rush in life.
We all face dozens of different risks every day. However, we all continue to live. There are much more serious diseases and dangers, but they are not told about on TV. Today, the greatest danger to the existence of humanity is news on TV. |
|
|
|
However, I firmly believe that people have the right to decide whether to stay at home or not This is against all reasons If these people are infected, they could infect other people. But you wouldn't (I hope) say that they have the right for this. Therefore, they must stay home if they caught the virus and know they are ill. You could argue that they should be quarantined or hospitalized, and I would likely agree with you. However, if they are not seriously affected and feel more or less fine, staying home should be okay as long as they actually stay home If people know that they are sick and can infect other people, then of course they should be conscious and not go out. There is no question of their going to Las Vegas. In some cases, this could be interpreted as deliberately infecting other people. I probably should have clarified this earlier. I am talking about millions of people who are not ill and who have been forcibly put under house arrest as criminals. Nope, I don't think so in total. Although people have right of movement but it can also be limited especially when it threatens national security and in which in this case of lockdown because of covid-19 can threaten national security where government has order stay at home.
The government primary and upper most responsibility is to protect life's and property and staying at home can help government to achieve that to avoid the disease from spreading. However, the government can provide financial support to help people at home.
And who compensates people for financial and moral losses from being forced to stay at home? |
|
|
|
If quarantine measures have not been introduced in your country, then I can assume that the declared statistics can be fabricated to one degree or another.
Even Sweden, which did not enter quarantine, admitted that this was a mistake, and moved to one of the first places in terms of mortality in Europe.
But Sweden is not one of those countries that will hide data, but many others who have not entered quarantine practice this.
There are two doctors in my family. They are now working on the frontline of the fight against the virus. One of them even had a coronavirus and fortunately recovered. In their medical institutions, death statistics are not fabricated. That's why I draw these conclusions about statistics across the country. Time will tell who was right and how the losses in the economy will affect countries and their citizens. However, I firmly believe that people have the right to decide whether to stay at home or not. |
|
|
|
Что-то не так с shitcoins.club, как вы смотрите на их сайте.
На главной странице итальянского сайта все банкоматы за пределами Италии исчезли.
~
Открыл shitcoins.club с IP из Беларуси. Показываются банкоматы во всех странах Европы где они есть:  ...
In special cases, such as attempts to cover your face during transaction, we reserve the right to require you to scan your identity card even for smaller amounts.
...
Я правильно перевожу это: " скрыть лицо во время транзакции"? Значит банкомат сканирует лица покупателей даже если они покупают Биткоин на маленькие суммы? Мне бы не понравилось покупать в таких банкоматах в этом случае. |
|
|
|
~
There are an alternatives to satisfy ourselves in gambling and that is through online, hence until its not safe to go outside its better to stay home.
I will tell you based on my experience. Playing in an online casino and playing in a casino are very different. If you want to relax and have a good time first of all, then an offline casino is the best option. I would also like to fly to Las Vegas, but I can't do it yet for other reasons. I hope I do it one day. |
|
|
|
Of course they have the right but the government also has the responsibility to ensure that the virus will not spread more.
As they opened the casino, it's expected that people will once again play and they can't rely on the casinos only, the government has to help in implementing the protocol to ensure that the casino are following everything in place.
I think people need to make their own decisions on this issue. The government has already done everything it can. Now that the epidemic has begun to ease a little, the government is right to give people a choice. We are adults and everyone makes their own decision. It's wrong to keep everyone at home by force. |
|
|
|
I’m UK based but I’m glad, we need to start getting back to normal soon. This pandemic has claimed lives but really it’s a tiny, tiny % of the numbers that get infected. We can’t hide away at home forever, economies are collapsing, unemployment numbers are increasing. We need to get back to some kind of normality.
There was no quarantine in my country. I recently looked at the death statistics. The death rate was a couple of percent higher than from the flu. Of course, lost lives can't be returned. And each of us should take care of ourselves and our families. However, it is worth remembering that each person is responsible for himself. And if someone wants to fly to Las Vegas and try their luck twice (once in a casino, the other time exposing themselves to the risk of infection), then they have the right to do it. |
|
|
|
People need to "let off steam" from time to time. Most often this is done by playing sports or watching sports games. Gambling is also a great way to test your nerves and luck.
In the conditions of self-isolation, gambling in online casinos has remained almost the only opportunity to "blow off steam". Therefore, it is natural that in these conditions, the demand for online casinos has grown. And of course, the attendance of crypto casinos should also have increased.
Being able to play at the same may have a chance to gain profit at the comfort of our home is the new norm, though profit is not guaranteed, it's just people will keep trying it to put some fun for themselves at the same time trying their luck in gambling. During lockdown I was able to try different gambling sites that I'd never been before when I have a regular 8 hr job, so many will seek more ways to do things online even in gambling. I have always played in casinos for the purpose of entertaining myself and having a good time. Therefore, I am thinking from this position. People stay at home and get bored. They also need to cheer themselves up. Of course, there are also those people who play in casinos only for the purpose of earning money. And all of them increase the number of visits to online casinos. it is natural that in these conditions, the demand for online casinos has grown. And of course, the attendance of crypto casinos should also have increased.
Yes, it seems until we are going to have vaccine for covid19, I guess these scenarios keep going up which will definitely scale some unforgettable peaks. I guess most gambling houses are adjusting/adding servers to make sure their remaining accessible even with multi-fold access requests. Online casino owners want their sites to work steadily and cope with the increased number of visitors. Therefore, it is natural that they will work to increase the bandwidth of servers. This is much easier to do than an offline casino. It is not so easy to increase the size of halls. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
