Snipin' dat shit. Poor honest bob, no Amazon love today.
I've got no time to play games and I'm sure tgmarks doesn't either. kind of ironic, going to the trouble to post that. |
|
|
|
|
trying to figure out what the heck this website is... somebody's name on there is f*** theymos lol
|
|
|
|
|
I can do 1.4, I plan on buying something from amazon in a couple weeks
|
|
|
|
whats it worth to you?
1.2 btc |
|
|
|
|
I vote that it is, for reasons I promise not to go into. It is also making me money.
|
|
|
|
Its not much, but I'm not going to use it any time soon. Anyone interested in a $10 gift code?
price? |
|
|
|
|
Thanks a million p4man. I posted a five-star review in the honest traders list. I was prepared to never see a bit cent from you. Thanks for putting up with the hassle too.
|
|
|
|
+10 to p4man. I sent him 50 euros cash in the mail, he sent 12 btc in return. He could have easily said the money got lost in the mail and kept the cash anyway, and I couldn't have said a thing about it. I was really prepared to not get anything. Seriously, that's kind of a big deal to me. Thanks p4man! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=80822.0 |
|
|
|
No further comments.
lol tell me about it. |
|
|
|
|
i am confident that it is a ponzi. I do not have proof, because I do not need proof. If it is a ponzi, there is no proof to be had. Sort of like how you can't prove that unicorns do or don't exist. in what universe does somebody offer 7% weekly when half that much would still have people lining up to get in? The 7% keeps people from withdrawing their principal. It is set at 7% for that reason and no other. If this were a real business, run by a real business man, all of that excess profit would be kept by the promoter. Depositors are too greedy to withdraw with those returns on the table. It really is very simple.
I have only 10 btc in BTCST as I type this (hedged with betsofbitcoin). But that is also most of my bitcoins atm. I am looking for a quick buck or two. But honestly, the sooner this shit defaults, the sooner bitcoin can start recovering from all the damage. But go ahead and flame me anyway.
This is the one post I will make regarding the ponzi issue. Peace.
|
|
|
|
there;s nothing more to cover bob
neato |
|
|
|
Boom. Just saw the results today. I snagged some at the very bottom for 1.0851  This was my first time to actually use GLBSE, really cool. I love the new interface. I got in right at the very very bottom for 1.085001. My order was only partly filled. My brain hurts trying to work out how little a difference that is. 0.000999 So one tenth of a percent over a month - "score!" Worth having - well done being on the cusp  maybe we should have a prize. I would rather have paid the 100,000 satoshis and had my order completely filled. I was AFK over the weekend so just put a bid in beforehand and hoped for the best. me too, i bid on like tuesday lol |
|
|
|
aren't those the ones i sold last night?
I dunno. I didn't check the time. I just noticed my bid order was only partially filled. So are you saying you sold at a loss? well last night i partially filled an order at that price. I think the order was for 40 and I sold 5 or 6. yeah i cashed out, i'm just depositing in btcst through another forum member. makes more sense to me, weekly payouts etc. I still made a profit overall by selling my ppt shares to the other order above yours. enjoy! |
|
|
|
|
aren't those the ones i sold last night?
|
|
|
|
|
for those of you who haven't seen it, I have a special offer on the pyramining main thread in services, 12% starting out on a 50 btc deposit
|
|
|
|
*To celebrate the end of beta testing, I am offering a bonus on a first come, first serve basis!* My friends always poke fun at me about my bitcoin obsession, but now that I am quadrupling real money with pyramining, they are starting to take bitcoin seriously. Psy himself is turning 50 dollars into 2000 dollars, as he has stated in this forum. The money-making potential with pyramining is just obscene. Eliale, or however you spell his name, is insuring all deposits made on his referrals, and he claims to have actually visited Pyramining's physical location. I personally believe fully in this system too. And as such, i am offering to send 1 BTC (and no more) to the pyramining account's payout address if 50 btc or more are deposited in the referral below. On a deposit of 50 btc, that is an extra two percent, instantly payable... totalling 12 PERCENT WITH THIS REFERRAL on a deposit of 50 btc. http://pyramining.com/referral/e2atc9hzsPlease PM me to take advantage of this exclusive offer. |
|
|
|
do tend to think it's a Ponzi scheme, so I view it as a form of gambling. Hopefully no one else is gambling more than they can afford to lose.
Me too. I just put in with payb.tc, and hedged it a little on betsofbitcoin. I also dumped my PPT shares... oops. |
|
|
|
|
I am trusting user payb.tc with my 10 btc to be my BTCST pass through. Great communication, thanks for the opportunity to participate, payb.tc
+1
edit: received a payout today, exchanged a few messages, deposited 10 more bitcoins, and I decided that payb.tc is a standout guy.
|
|
|
|
I'd like to invest with Bitcoin Savings & Trust, but it's apparently pretty difficult to get an account and you can't get the best interest rate without risking tons of BTC. PPT is alright, but, as Meni Rosenfeld pointed out, the "insurance" is mostly meaningless and only makes figuring out the risk/reward more difficult.
I'd like to see a GLBSE asset like this:
- Each share represents 1 BTC invested in BS&T and gets weekly dividend payments equal to whatever BS&T pays minus a small fee for the owner of the asset.
- Every week at some predetermined time, the asset owner creates enough new shares to fill all bids of 1 BTC or more.
Anyone with a BS&T account want to do this?
So then ignore the insurance. Bid 1.1 and you'll get 1.28 in 28 days. That's ~18% a month. Is that not a fair return? edit: And the insurance isn't meaningless. It means you'll get .32 btc back for your 1.1 if pirate defaults. Using your scheme, you'd get nothing. If i'm understanding correctly, he is talking about a higher return (similar to a pirate account) that is completely uninsured (more risk). In this way the acount holder transfers more (all) risk to bondholders while taking a smaller fee off the top than PPT does. I think it's a great idea. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
