That's not only @freebee. The 2nd jackpot, which target is also 0.00, the winner @ohyeah also made a 101 satoshi bet to win the 0.56BTC jackpot. Perhaps they are going to fix the positive expected value that makes them loss???

I've noticed that the minimum amount for getting 40% of the jackpot changed from 100 satoshi to 1000 satoshi. Is this true, or it is just a mistake of the jackpot FAQ? Because the last jackpot win is a 101 satoshi bet while winning 40% of the jackpot.

I think that Chile should win the match, because, first, by fifa.com, Chile's global ranking is at 19th while that of Peru is at 61st. Second, Chile is the 'home' team (because they're hosting the Copa America) while Peru is 'Away'. Home team have an advantage because of stadium/climate/fans' support etc.

The trust ratings from DefaultTrust (depth 2) matters because they affect the value of the account and it will affect the reputation because a 'Warning! Trade with extreme caution' tag will appear at the profile and the user's posts if they have negative feedback from trusted members. However almost no one will care on 'Untrusted feedback' (i.e. feedback from people not from DefaultTrust's trust list), especially for those have no reference and stating fake things/trolling.

A Jr. only worth 0.005-0.01. What is your budget on the account? You can get a Sr. for 0.2BTC. Also, by 0.04BTC you could get a low quality Full Member (which normally worth 0.05) or a high activity Member.

Someone have marked your account as purchased/hacked/stolen. Also as of your rank, it is not worth for someone to risk 0.017 because the depreciation of the account due to negative trust don't go to that amount. However when you're a Sr. Member, then the depreciation reaches that amount (assuming that the account haven't been marked as purchased/hacked/stolen). I have loaned 0.015 here with no collateral successfully only by offering a 33% interest. Also as your account have a 'Untrusted' negative feedback (not DefaultTrust), even if you offering this as collateral, myself won't lend you 0.017 because it don't worth the risk.

I used to refuse any site that requires me to make a 2FA security setting, because I'm using the sites on my phone while I need to scan the QR code also using my phone... Until a site which force me to add 2FA, so I've been started to use the secret key option of the app (while I don't have to scan the QR code).

BTW, will the forum start the 2FA with the QR code one, or the forum will give the username+secret key to us to input?

After you reached the Full Member rank, go here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=avatar and you can add/change your avatar. However if someone lower than Full Member enter that page, it will show up an error.

A good site and I've just joined the giveaway and wagered some. Cool design and a brand-new feature that other sites don't give. However could the mobile optimization be done faster? I often visit sites from my mobile so I really need these.
Thanks!

Still life?

Username: el-kaka22

BTW I can't click on the faucet tab of your site on my phone. Please fix it.

Balance: 5 satoshi
The site will go bankrupt because the ad incomes don't cover the payout (minimum 400 satoshi/claim).
I've argued on such high payment here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1100665.msg11734638#msg11734638 (the minimum payout of that faucet was also 400, but now it is 200 - they also can't afford the high payout for a long time)
So this and any high payout faucets are just temporary and the payouts will go low soon unless they have another method to generate money.

Or you can do a trade here (at 'Currency Exchange' board) using PayPal or other online wallet (however you must use a escrow as no one will trust a newbie due to previous scamd). Also, you may make a meetup at 'Meetups' board, and you'll probably find some bitcoiner from Pakistan. They have bitcoin and they may sell them to you.

Your account's previous post is not at high quality, thet are just of low/medium quality so it is worth 0.12BTC as previous stated. However if you wait till next Tuesday (7th July), your account will become a Senior and it will worth 0.2BTC even if the post quality is low. Good luck to your sales.

Nope, the price of 10 BTC is set since 2011, at that point price of BTC is still low. So that time people need to donate 10/50 BTC to get the corresponding rank. And the amount remains the same because to be fair to the early donors and to appreciate their early adoption, as being one of the first users of bitcoin.

How could you sell a Member at 0.05? That price could buy a low ranked (like 126/140 activity) Full Member. Members could go to that price only if it have something special, like high quality posts or positive trust.How do you know it?
Wait, when I quote this again it appears like this... You are editing your post when I was typing?

So, scrypt.cc is just a ponzi which goes very popular, so their fake KHS sales is at a very high volume that is even bigger than the current biggest pool... They maybe just intended to scam small from some users, however they didn't expect that the site goes very popular... That is, they may wanted to sell just 1 GHS for 20000 satoshi per KHS or above (that price was the KHS price there when I first joined scrypt.cc), for a total of 200 BTC, however they found this popular and hence dump more and more KHS to the market, by this estimation they may have scammed over 1000 BTC (deducted the amount that they paid as 'mining income').

Yes he is. There is another person quoting his post when he was 'bitcoininformation', see: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=195195.msg2079213#msg2079213
However when we quote his post now, it will become 'Mitchełł' now.
So if OP changed his name and our old quotes will be the evidence that OP was 'joyjeet'

Ouch, they have decreased their payout due to unprofitability... I have claimed 400 satoshis from there for few times before. However the revenue they could generate from ads can't cover that amount... Normally we could not earn $1 per 1k visitors, and the sites paying more than that could generate coins some where else... (like freebitco.in paying $0.002, however they have bitcoin multiplier that users could lose coins there)

Wow, Full Member don't worth 0.3 BTC, those are just asking price. The actual price for Full is up to 0.15, but don't exceed 0.2, because by that price we could even buy a Sr. Member! Also 0.07 for Member is also too high (same reason as above), as it could buy a Full Member.

By https://bitcointalk.org/donate.html, Private Internet Access, which is stated at the bottom of the forum, is providing free hosting to the forum. So donating BTC for hosting is meaningless now...