Looking for a partner to translate ENG-RUS
Hello English speakers. I wanna make a deal, find me an Eng- Rus translation project or job (contract). When you use "google - translate" you will get rough translation,send this rough Russian and english text to me, I will correct it, and send it back to you in correct Russian. The money we will earn, I wanna split 50%-50%, if you like this opportunity than send me a message. thx
have you ever looked at mturk.com? Most of the stuff on there pays garbage, but the translation work isn't too bad (or wasn't last time I checked, about a year ago). Not sure if there is any eng->rus or rus->eng on there, though... was lots of arabic translation work |
|
|
|
QNpjAZQcWUFjJ7EwkbAZLUcmRjVYPMoks9: 10.02514
QXhMSKx4ahbpj7M5APh6SoBjtmssR9HuEW: 13.39316
QiCJawut76HtKhq6Eg5CrMm5NUDswKkWEQ: 19.21159
QgTsq3KKoCRBqzY7Z9WqHiNErP6yghky1S: 25.04391
QNDhMdGXTKRwTixKpkS7Ecu7ty2eYdjeBE: 30.85181
Qj2gPtBJgNDbKrzsJUA13TnFxqvpuxhrfq: 33.65265
QMNkMnFmuQGvJKcxNnL3Xf7uKn8eCgXqNC: 34.52418
since I am lazy, i'll just send all the addresses a full block's worth as compensation for share switch-over from the 15th. i've never run any of these pools for profit, so no big deal. *but* distribution makes the invester in me sad. it was nice to see that ~5m buy on crypsty QQMuvyeLwKnuVXR47Fv23oUyedgHmw7LqB: 0.2426 QTyVuN2ucBStXbpvyZPEc2xrc66NdweLfq: 0.39409 QRPFckhPyhs3npbNL5vNyED9sioGJCUeYL: 0.44141 QfdJxVnjMT7JLHNyAxYib7RuYuJuW8nMpu: 1.32954 QYqGtup8Fzn5tbA8qJJ2QYY3s4T1Q75Yxo: 2.08758 QSLuND45qk9zp8p1TscodpCRDswqF8SAoA: 3.24112 QcnH4L6FJGaN9QWcyygAWTDmZ8V2j3S71E: 3.28512 QNYyRMETQz5uV9xCC2QM3BhRjxpzbh7R3y: 3.7096 Qi98ESHWbR1gWyj3ZccLcykAeydvjhSX1G: 4.14351 QZ6y39ZZrwapPVXuB2vWxpVrG6px3Z6QGp: 7.75815 QNpjAZQcWUFjJ7EwkbAZLUcmRjVYPMoks9: 10.02514 QXhMSKx4ahbpj7M5APh6SoBjtmssR9HuEW: 13.39316 QiCJawut76HtKhq6Eg5CrMm5NUDswKkWEQ: 19.21159 QgTsq3KKoCRBqzY7Z9WqHiNErP6yghky1S: 25.04391 QNDhMdGXTKRwTixKpkS7Ecu7ty2eYdjeBE: 30.85181 Qj2gPtBJgNDbKrzsJUA13TnFxqvpuxhrfq: 33.65265 QMNkMnFmuQGvJKcxNnL3Xf7uKn8eCgXqNC: 34.52418 i pulled the full list (minus the amount I mined for myself). i'll round up to the nearest coin (so the amount sent will be 1, 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 4, 5, 8, 11, 14, 20, 26, 31, 34, 35 respectively). for anyone that owns these addresses and sees some bizarre transaction, refer to message https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg3228451#msg3228451 |
|
|
|
|
I guess I'll say that I do really have *some* interest
I don't suppose it's possible to get a price of $5/ea or less even when buying several hundred units?
|
|
|
|
have to register? seems like wasting too much effort for not any benefit |
|
|
|
Just broke .000002  I see +2 decimals soon! hah, that'd be nice it is a bit odd in having a digital coin where the "newly minted" amt decreases so sharply over time, i'm holding about 2% of the total amount available right now. seemed like a decent experiment how many quark is that ? 221,612,289 * 2% = 4,432,245 QRK Yeah, more like 4.2m... just rounded it off =p I've mined maybe 200k of it, I got about 500k in early Sep and the rest sep 24-25 on cryptsy |
|
|
|
Just broke .000002 I see +2 decimals soon! hah, that'd be nice it is a bit odd in having a digital coin where the "newly minted" amt decreases so sharply over time, i'm holding about 2% of the total amount available right now. seemed like a decent experiment |
|
|
|
Would you let a legal botnet connect to your pool? Read more here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=301468.new#newAll miners would be connecting from a single block/range of IP addresses. If you'd like a boatload of intel i5/i7 computers running minerd.exe to connect to our pool please post below. I'd prefer altcoins or a profit-switching pool, but essentially I'm looking for a pool where I can connect multiple computers using a wallet address as the username or a pool with a worker configuration system simple enough to easily connect this many computers. EDIT: You'll make mad fee income from this project and it has the possibility for (legal) expansion in the future. What can your pool do for my project  Well, it's just a p2pool, but if you wanted to give it a run I've got a quarkcoin pool set up at nogleg.com:8372. Shouldn't be a problem unless it's over 300 or 400 connections (I've already had 400 on there at once).. the fee is 0%, though the last time I had the hundreds of connections, I raised it to 1%. it uses a modified minerd with the algo=quark option (this - github.com/uncle-bob/quarkcoin-cpuminer) i've also got a xeon 1240v3 in dallas and an e5-1650 in phoenix that could be set up for something possibly (ed: oh, the log is also symlinked & viewable at nogleg.com/quark.log, cleaned fairly regularly... ed2: and i have quarkcoind configured to require a 0.0001 transaction fee, so it misses most of em, which are 0) |
|
|
|
... the actual rate is the 8.22MH/s, but it just reports the 528kH/s (well, in this case since there are two pools operating, it'd be like 7mh/s on pool 1 and 1.2mh/s on pool 2... but the local rates still don't add up to the pool rate). i installed the https://github.com/Neisklar/quarkcoin-hash-python but that only fixes my own miner, not what the pool reports? re: if I start mining with one of my servers, the local rate goes up a ton That python module is only for calculating the blockhash using the quark algorithm for p2pool and the blockexplorer, it's not for a miner. There are minerd version out there which have a small bug, that they only report 0.0039 Diff or higher shares. It's fixed (and i'm sorry for that i accidentially hide it somewhat in the commit messages) in the quarkcoin cpu miner repo https://github.com/Neisklar/quarkcoin-cpuminer/commit/b1af442712ee82fe9764df3812d134a99e11e3f2. That can be the cause of wrong reported values. I think i did not update the binaries i released, since at that point, i though that such a low diff would never be happen again and did not though about the p2pool and the pseudo shares. (You could workaound in the p2pool by raising the lowest pseudoshare target) ah, yeah, that makes sense, not sure why i didn't think of it. can just see it from my own graphs, from when hashrate dropped i probably will change it later, was thinking about making time between shares 30s as well (up from the 20s i have it set to atm) (ed: there's also quite a few new commits to p2pool i want to put in as well) |
|
|
|
i started http://nogleg.net:8372/ back up, it is connected to the nogleg.com:8372 pool. should get maybe 0.1-0.3% more orphans or something, but maybe less DOA, depending on your connection. it's located in Dallas, Texas.. I get 40ms ping times there, 185ms to my host in germany, and that host gets 130ms ping times to germany. for the last day or so it's just been running 8 thread minerd. for the record, the xeon *e1240v3 gets about 800khash ok, since nobody is using the dallas server except myself, going to just take it down for now so i can experiment w/ some stuff on it w/o impacting anyone's mining. and i'm still planning on looking at 3-4 hrs worth of blocks after i reset the shares to see if anyone got screwed. might not get around to it for another day or two though btw, any clues as to why the pool reports incorrect local hash rate? re: Pool rate: 8.22MH/s (4.8% DOA+orphan) Share difficulty: 0.00486 Node uptime: 0.868 days Peers: 0 out, 1 in Local rate: 528kH/s (2.3% DOA) Expected time to share: 0.0110 hours ... the actual rate is the 8.22MH/s, but it just reports the 528kH/s (well, in this case since there are two pools operating, it'd be like 7mh/s on pool 1 and 1.2mh/s on pool 2... but the local rates still don't add up to the pool rate). i installed the https://github.com/Neisklar/quarkcoin-hash-python but that only fixes my own miner, not what the pool reports? re: if I start mining with one of my servers, the local rate goes up a ton |
|
|
|
It is kinda over priced.
Yeah, they still are. I hope to see them drop to .10 or below. If they do, I'll probably buy some more. I wonder what the actual manufacture cost is. Still, is it even worth it? if you're looking for a return on your investment, i think a $5 price point would be marginal (decreasing daily)... i guess some of it depends on your electricity costs (how much does it use anyway? around 3-5 watts?)... if you just bought one, a lot would depend on your computer habits too, i suppose (i.e. do you leave it running overnight etc) anyway, if I saw one for a few bucks, I'd probably grab it... maybe as a potential collectible, wtf... replace my star wars collection |
|
|
|
I am having issues to connect ?
does p2pool actually start up? i would think mostly people would probably have an issue with listen=0 or so in the bitcoin.conf file |
|
|
|
Problem: I got over 1M QRK and I fail to transfer large amounts (no I'm NOT selling) to other addresses. Anything above 4000 QRK gives me an error. Any solution to sending larger amounts? I've played around with different fee settings, to no avail. Also salvaged the wallet.
Tranferring
Suggestions?
Did you mine those coins on P2pool? I remember reading somewhere in this thread that an outgoing transaction can't have more than 160 inputs. So if the coins that you have were p2pool coins and they arrived in very small amounts, it's going to be very hard/impossible to move them in large amounts. I mined on p2pool and averaged incoming transactions anywhere from 16-40 quark per transaction, and the maximum that I was able to send out was 6000 per transaction. well, i thought it was size limited to 10kb, but the # of transactions could be same thing i guess i started http://nogleg.net:8372/ back up, it is connected to the nogleg.com:8372 pool. should get maybe 0.1-0.3% more orphans or something, but maybe less DOA, depending on your connection. it's located in Dallas, Texas.. I get 40ms ping times there, 185ms to my host in germany, and that host gets 130ms ping times to germany. for the last day or so it's just been running 8 thread minerd. for the record, the xeon *e1240v3 gets about 800khash ed: hah, ok, done messing with it. changed the share period to 20s from 15s, increased spread to 100 blocks from i think it was at 50 (so shares you get won't 'disappear' for twice as long, but it also takes longer for new miners to build up value). also decreased fee back to 0% on both. to do all this, it seems like i had to erase previous shares. but if there's some block solving bonanza, i'll send some coins from my personal wallet to the addresses that had values over 10:
QNpjAZQcWUFjJ7EwkbAZLUcmRjVYPMoks9: 10.02514
QXhMSKx4ahbpj7M5APh6SoBjtmssR9HuEW: 13.39316
QiCJawut76HtKhq6Eg5CrMm5NUDswKkWEQ: 19.21159
QgTsq3KKoCRBqzY7Z9WqHiNErP6yghky1S: 25.04391
QNDhMdGXTKRwTixKpkS7Ecu7ty2eYdjeBE: 30.85181
Qj2gPtBJgNDbKrzsJUA13TnFxqvpuxhrfq: 33.65265
QMNkMnFmuQGvJKcxNnL3Xf7uKn8eCgXqNC: 34.52418
(for the next few hrs, after that they would have been knocked off anyway)
... ok, so there was some block solving bonanza. lots of blocks in the first 15 minutes and another now after about 50m. it looks like a few of those ppl were actual beneficiaries of the reset though (i.e. QMN got 80 quarks for the first block).. i'll figure it out later tonight or tomorrow morning, re: who got screwed by shares getting reset and then send out some compensation |
|
|
|
|
reverted to old version after
BDB0055 illegal flag specified to DB_ENV->open
2013-09-24 16:49:15 Bitcoin version v0.8.2-419-gfb8724e-dirty-beta (2013-09-23 14:23:14 -0700)
2013-09-24 16:49:15 Using OpenSSL version OpenSSL 1.0.1 14 Mar 2012
2013-09-24 16:49:15 Default data directory /home/jibbajabba/bitcoin.ramdisk
2013-09-24 16:49:15 Using data directory /home/jibbajabba/bitcoin.ramdisk
2013-09-24 16:49:15 Using at most 950 connections (100000 file descriptors available)
2013-09-24 16:49:15 Using 8 threads for script verification
2013-09-24 16:49:15 init message: Verifying wallet...
2013-09-24 16:49:15 dbenv.open LogDir=/home/jibbajabba/bitcoin.ramdisk/database ErrorFile=/home/jibbajabba/bitcoin.ramdisk/db.log
2013-09-24 16:49:15 ERROR: CDB() : error Invalid argument (22) opening database environment
2013-09-24 16:49:15 Moved old /home/jibbajabba/bitcoin.ramdisk/database to /home/jibbajabba/bitcoin.ramdisk/database.1380041355.bak. Retrying.
2013-09-24 16:49:15 dbenv.open LogDir=/home/jibbajabba/bitcoin.ramdisk/database ErrorFile=/home/jibbajabba/bitcoin.ramdisk/db.log
2013-09-24 16:49:15 ERROR: CDB() : error Invalid argument (22) opening database environment
2013-09-24 16:49:15 Error: Error initializing wallet database environment /home/jibbajabba/bitcoin.ramdisk!
2013-09-24 16:49:15 StopNode()
i have db5.1 installed, but dont care about wallet anything on this server
|
|
|
|
the ks-2g could run one adequately, but that, the ks-4g and the ks-16g are sold out
You're dreaming if you think a single core Atom will run p2pool with any efficiency. A Celeron 847, which is WAY faster than an Atom really struggles, even running a text-only Ubuntu server install on SSD. The slowest machine I've had it running properly on is a Pentium G620 (dual core 2.6GHz Sandy Bridge). Currently my p2pool node runs on my mining/workstation machine, which is an i3-3220T with 8GB RAM and SSD drive. why wouldnt it? it has 2GB RAM and a 500GB HDD obviously you wouldnt want to make it public and have a ton of people connecting to it i guess the only thing ive noticed is that with an i7-4930k you can get the getblocktemplate latency down to 0.7ms or so (though i guess this would be more reliant on having quality memory, eh). if you chop out all transactions it'll go for 0.85 or 0.9ms on one of those old hetzner 2700k's |
|
|
|
sorry for the lack of warning for anyone on it, but pool is down right now maybe just temporarily, i'll have to check it out more later alright, it's fixed.. was an issue with a newer version of libboost i compiled (ed: eh, it looks like it's underreporting Local rate again, Local rate reflected in shares is accurate) i'm also testing with nogleg.net:8372 connected to nogleg.com atm |
|
|
|
sorry for the lack of warning for anyone on it, but pool is down right now maybe just temporarily, i'll have to check it out more later |
|
|
|
hi I would like to popularize p2pool and as I see most new miners don't understand payouts system of p2pool. Pleez if there are 'master of words'  among us - give me great and simple text to explain that well, you can see my logfile at www.nogleg.com/logthere is a lot of 'hash > target' spam, but the main thing is New work for worker! Difficulty: 6.378540 Share difficulty: 45149.134946 Total block value: 25.082902 BTC including 67 transactions so to understand payouts i guess you'd have to understand that your miner will report that it's finding hashes or w/e, but in this case there's about a 1/7000 chance it's found an actual share the base difficulty is show it'll show up on the graph as actually having some activity |
|
|
|
just a fyi i guess, i'm getting over 600 incoming connections to my quarkcoin mining port (the vast majority from two subnets), so I imagine some botnet is "probably" at work
though i'm just going to let it keep running until/if it crashes. i've got other things going on right now (re: gall bladder removed like three days ago, jaja) and it's fairly interesting to see how much it can handle anyway
plus it's better than being DDoS'ed
anyhow, i dropped my # of bitcoind connections about 400, so it's down to 900 open TCP sockets right now. if it crashes/drops offline/gets DDoS'ed it'lll probably be down for at least 12hrs
i am going to restart the p2pool server, because 1) it'll be a bit more efficient, and 2) it's taking so much resources that it's starting to impact some other stuff, so i'm going to actually implement a fee of 1% (that's on nogleg.com:8372 aka 5.9.24.81:8372).. bitcoin side is still 0% ed: ok, done resetting it now, had to change some more stuff. log is still linked at www.nogleg.com/quark.log, DOA shares won't be accurate for a while since with increasing hashrate it'll be spitting out too low difficulty shares for a few mins |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
