Scam service offers are better than legitimate ones, right? If you want to make people less suspicious, just make it more attractive with values that are close to reasonable (like 125% APY might make sense for people who are used to memecoins). If someone has a gambling background they'll consider this a bet, if it is legit then they get the jackpot, if it is a scam they lose. The difference is, losses in this case is something they can't afford because it usually involves more money than regular betting.

What type of review site?
There are types of reviews based on the personal description or experience of the author (site owner) and can't be commented on by visitors, the author may be paid to carry out the scenario you suspect.
If it was a user based review site say like trustpilot, I would look at the moderation levels. In fact, there is no casino that is truly clean with a 1 star score.

In what form do you mean the warning?
I still see this gambling board description in place
Or maybe you mean it's a..
topic: maybe someone reported it, and scored as good.
factoid slots: It is displayed randomly, if it is also not in this list^[1], it is probably really removed by the admin for some reason.


1. https://bitcointalk.org/adrotate.php?adinfo

That's a real shot, I'm not really sure if a gambler can resist saying "ok maybe one more time, what's the harm?" when the previous bet fails. Interactive gambling really tempts you to place more bets. If someone has $1k in his account, that doesn't mean he doesn't have reserves elsewhere to catch up on the $1k he might lose. On the other hand, if we talk about numbers, every big win of one person is a small loss for many others. This means that those who lose will always come back to win someone, this is the gambling matrix.

Trustwallet only supports the mobile version and browser extension, it isn't a web category.

Basically the web wallet service is very limited, technically this wallet isn't recommended at all and there aren't many fans as it can't be integrated into the dapps ecosystem in a practical way.

I don't understand why this is a separate rule. What I know is that the previous ban was a general ban for existing cryptocurrencies, does this indicate the identification of some violators after the total crypto ban from the Chinese themselves?

Has your friend met the criteria for being an unusual user, for example a VIP member or has reached a certain amount of bets (which not many users achieve) in some time? The method for selecting winners is not as transparent as I have seen in Twitter free sweepstakes in general, I hope there are no side criteria that aren't disclosed.

PM me your USDT OKX wallet, then will give you my TON wallet. You go first.
Done with @Albon smoothly.

You with a $150k portfolio are asking for my advice with only $1k of capital, isn't that ridiculous? Your background is quite experienced with losses, you should be able to advise yourself not just to be patient.
If you really want my advice, I'd stop with $150k and get on with real life. Man, in my country you can even live above average for up to 20 years with that money.

Bitcoin is a currency, crypto/altcoins are business ecosystem and scheme. While the war was going on, business stopped, the currency remained valuable. So, why bitcoin? This money is perfect for financing wars, military aid, arms trade as the western media believes. This means that certain people continue to use it as long as possible.

Jarang ada manajer yg juga menjalankan sigcam (berbayar BTC) perusahaan yg sama di forum lain. Dan sy juga tidak yakin ada perusahaan yg tertarik memasarkan layanan di forum2 yg notabene dipenuhi "bounty armies". Sekarang hanya kebetulan karena mikser dilarang, mulai ada sigcam berbayar BTC (meski rate gajinya rendah).
Kalo maksud OP tentang membagi waktu, seharusnya bisa apalagi yg udah punya alts di forum ini dan biasa join 2 sigcam pada saat bersamaan.

It's good if Poorbot do it in the future. I checked in the gambling section that there was a list of casinos^[1] that had exchanges integrated into the platform. Poorbot can use this reference to expand its business to several platforms that are not available exchangers but are quite well known on this forum.


1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5282289.0

HitBTC does not serve US customers, according to web archives from 2019^[1]. But they haven't enforced mandatory KYC during registration for customers (this is their dirty trick to confiscate user funds).

If you report today you must bring proof of serious violations, for example you caught them serving US customers. Based on the laxity of KYC, this kind of violation is possible.

1. https://web.archive.org/web/20191104095036/https://hitbtc.com/terms-of-use

Since childhood, I was introduced to this country as a poor country. I read the news that they have started to rise recently and are starting to improve even though they aren't pushing down the rankings of the poorest countries much. I think there is something wrong with their development roadmap target so it has to lead to debt default.
Anyway, they're in debt to China, are they falling into the Chinese's debt trap myth? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-QDEWwSkP0

Can wordfilters bot be more effective in catching links inserted between bbcode? I think this is a useful loophole for a while for mixer-managed shills. I can write unclickable links without worrying about getting filtered this way, and it will stay there if no one reports it

Also, check out this guy's signature: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5236689.msg54131263#msg54131263
It's unclickable, but it still explains many things.

Trusting experts may have risks, even greater than betting based on personal luck. Firstly, how is the expert badge obtained? Don't say it's because it's just an achievement on one of the platforms or gambling places. We never know whether their scenario/trick (between bookies and experts) to get lots of bettors/bigger bets at one table for one prediction leads to mass losses. This may be an overstated assumption, but I believe it exists.

My real champ:
OddJobsForBitcoin, who keeps me enthusiastic about looking for merit jobs.
Don't ask me any further, please. The people who inspire me change every day.

if there are similarities in the ways, this is just a coincidence.

This is the first time, because there has never been another entity that "interferes" with the network like ordinals. Look at the transaction traffic chart throughout history, how do you see the big spike recently compared to the 2021's ATH session?: https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-transactions.html#alltime
As I said before there is no direct correlation that high prices must result in high fee rates (in sats units). Network congestion can occur even if bitcoin is worth $1.

Price fluctuations don't directly affect fee fluctuations, you can compare the two in the bullish phase throughout 2021. When the 2nd price peak was reached (July to November), the fee rates was almost stagnant at $2 to $5 for 1 transaction.



And currently, coincidentally, the ordinals NFT hype is causing thousands of transactions faltered and increase each other's fees to get priority confirmation speed. Had that happened in bear season 5 years ago (2018), the fee rates would probably be as severe as they're today.

The answer: Obviously network congestion.
The solution: Obviously, overhaul the protocol somehow.
For the record, there is no perfect protocol (even up to date) that can answer some its network problems in the future. Improvements must continue to be made.

No, isn't that a visible risk without having to implement it first? One of them only makes the business stop growing because the casino is hampered from increasing its bankroll.
Unless the casino works with a funding partner, that can happen. But again, it's too risky to agree. Gamblers can bet more than they can afford if they have a previous plan to escape debt.