|
yeah you might be right. If we compare the task for social media bounty that we need to share/retweet 3-5 posts everyweek, or even some of bounty required us to make original post. Not to mention that we also need to make weekly report, and then at the end of the campaign we are not paid well. Airdrop is better, but when we can pick a very good project for our bounty campaign we can earn some big money from bounty.
|
|
|
|
on your site I see the description "80%" under "ICO coming soon !!", please explain what you mean by 80%?
and maybe you can also explain why you prefer to use the Waves blockchain
We prefer Waves platform because it has the WavesDex official from the Waves Platform. It just shown that among other emerging smart contract platform they have more concern on how their developer's token could be listed in the exchange. Ethereum may have many decentralize exchange too but it is not official. In term of Gas (transaction fee) waves platform is way more efficient than Ethereum, and their scalability is not significantly different. Waves still guarantee fast and stable transaction but has less fee. well,, this is just because of wavedex right ? for me the reason is good enough but, does this project will try to be listed on others exchange maybe a major exchange in the future besides wavedex ? The first major exchange we will aim to be listed is HotBit, we also planning to be listed on indonesian local exchange Indodax shortlu after our ICO, |
|
|
|
Wow, Indonesian ICO project based islamic social network. I hope this project will succes in the ICO like PundiX.
Aamiin Ya Rabbal'alamiin, thanks. Please support our project. Any plan for exchanges such as Binance, Okex, Bittrex? Thank you.
Yes, but maybe later, first we will try to get registered on HotBit, indodax and maybe some other South East Asian exchanges. The ICO has not yet begun to be seen from the road map. The first quarter has been listed, will it enter the exchange, is this not wrong? try fixing before the community asks about it.
The ICO is not in the First Quarter of 2019 it is on the Second-Fourth Quarter of 2019. how much the soft cap for the ICO later? The ICO has not yet begun to be seen from the road map. The first quarter has been listed, will it enter the exchange, is this not wrong? try fixing before the community asks about it.
after i read the Whitepaper in Q1 the project just listed market research, not listed on an exchange if you see the whitepaper it's written that between Q2-Q4 they will start the Pre-sale and ICO we have not set a softcap because no matter how much we raise during the ICO, this project will proceed Hello ..please verify your team members in all listed ICO review site to gain more trust. Thanks and Good Luck
Thank you @lucky80 for your very useful advice, we will make sure to do this. May God bless you Islamic social network can be very good idea. But blockchain technology isnt enough to take attention of people. I think you will need a good advertisement campaign.
Yes, we hope the support for the whole community to help advertise our project, thank you for your advice. God Bless you. on your site I see the description "80%" under "ICO coming soon !!", please explain what you mean by 80%?
and maybe you can also explain why you prefer to use the Waves blockchain
We prefer Waves platform because it has the WavesDex official from the Waves Platform. It just shown that among other emerging smart contract platform they have more concern on how their developer's token could be listed in the exchange. Ethereum may have many decentralize exchange too but it is not official. In term of Gas (transaction fee) waves platform is way more efficient than Ethereum, and their scalability is not significantly different. Waves still guarantee fast and stable transaction but has less fee. |
|
|
|
|
Yeah, HotBit is pretty ok for an exchange, my deposit got stuck for a little while, but when I claim to their support their response was good and quick. However, I found that their exchange platform are not stable, my order got delayed several times.
|
|
|
|
|
Any token that lauched their IEO in Binance or Bittrex will most likely to be succeeded. Even any IEO will most likely succeed since they are guaranteed to be listed on exchange. However, to determine which one is the best is very hard, since they all actually the same when we don't know how their development going. We can deterime which one is the best after we saw the project run for 2-3 years.
|
|
|
|
|
If this news is true, it will have a very huge effect for bitcoin, and it most likely will be a bad effect. Howeer it seems like you don't give any source either from government official report/news, or from a pres publication. Are just trying to spread FUD because recently the market is going well?
|
|
|
|
|
I only join bounties that either have an altcoin that is already listed on exchange, or bounties that paid me Bitcoin as a reward. It has more certainty that I will got paid, than joining ICO bounty. So most of the time I got paid for what I have done. For ICO bounty the last time I am actually got paid from ICO bounty is in 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
The most simple solution for that problem is just do not join those kind of campaign if you are not comfortable submitting your personal document. Those projects that requires KYC do that mostly because they need to comply to their state's law because the project are regulated by official government. I believe those project also irritated by KYC requirement since it also time consuming and need more effort. But, when the KYC are comply with government regulation it will less likely to become a scam.
So there is always an option and bounty hunters always have a choice.
|
|
|
|
|
They already do that, however the not everyone agreed on what are so-called shit coins. Some people trust some project and some other are not. I believeall exchange will delist any coins that seems like does not have any value or coins that have a really low daily volume, or coins from a project that are not comply to their terms and condition.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think it will give any treat to ethereum, not even close. Binance might got their hands on the IEO, but that's only because their trading platform has a lot of users. The thing is, the Binance Chain will target mostly developers, and traders and developers are very different community. Ethereum has made a very friendly platform for developers since it is decentralized, stable, and scalability is great. The Binance Chain on the other hand, I believe it will be centralized and that's already not good.
|
|
|
|
|
No, your statement is purely generalization, the whole BSV (BCH) delist is because of their own fault, it has nothing to do whether they are a bitcoin hardfork project or not. Any project that do the same thing as the Bitcoin SV team has done, will receive the same treatment no matter they are a bitcoin hardfork or not.
|
|
|
|
Hello Team, I didnt find a link on your website to your team member's profile. Can you provide links, please? we would like to read more information about their past jobs and experience. Thanks
Hello, we have updated the links in our website, please kindly check it again, and thank you for your suggestion. |
|
|
|
The KYC process annoys the hell out of me. I remember a time when you could trade coins freely and without owning up to your identity at all. Not that I'm hiding anything, I just don't like every man and his dog having a copy of my government ID - I feel that's very intrusive. I mean the whole idea of cryptocurrency was anonymous peer-to-peer trading without government intervention. Now it seems you can't fart in the wrong direction without someone breathing down your neck.
I mean I get it, exchanges, ICO's, etc, want to be on the safe side -- although what I really object to is these places accepting my crypto first and then telling me that I need to give them a mugshot if I want to use it, or withdraw it again. It's a nightmare.
Anyone else a bit miffed with all this identity craziness we're in right now?
Or am I just being a grumpy old man?
I got your point and I do agree on most of the part of your argument. I believe one of the main purpose of cryptocurrency is to protect user data from unnecessary evil third party and KYC is obstructing that purpose. However, in our current economic system when we still mainly use fiat money for transaction, we still need the KYC, I believe on most exchange you can trade any crypto without submitting your identity, only when you want to trade fiat money that you need to submit your identity. Other than that Decentralize exchange could be a possible solution for non kyc exchange. |
|
|
|
|
what do you mean by mandatory?
how do we make it mandatory?
I don't think we can make the system to demand all ico to do a live video, however I do believe every investors have their own standard to decide which ico they want to invest. And live video could be one of them.
|
|
|
|
|
Creating dice site for altcoin will absolute attract crypto gambler community and it will make the altcoin popular among this community moreover if they have good platform. But, not everyone who using crypto is gambler and willing to do gambling. So it is not very effective to attract the whole crypto community, I would say that Airdrop is better way to introduce their platform and their coin. No one will say no to a free coin, eventhough it only few dollars.
|
|
|
|
|
Well there are some bounty campaigns, that assumes you as an investor since they distribute your payment as they distribute the coin to the investors, so they threat bounty hunter the same as the investors, and the law in their state demand KYC from all of their customers including bounty hunter. And I believe before any project hire bounty manager they will do more than KYC.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, you know that other reasons for delisting BSV were kinda true, but that also probably just a formality for delisting a trash project. BSV actually deserve the delisting. No one will respect conman such Wright, moreover, it is Satoshi that he was impersonating, and most of crypto community respect Satoshi. The thing is even the decision of binance listing bsv at the first place was a questionable decision.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
