Since OP write 'Company' specifically and not 'Business' then I suppose what he means is at least a Company where there are a proper work division that has enough employee to handle each division. So, I guess it's pretty common knowledge for an owner of a Company at that scale to separate the fund. I don't think a business owners who are still combining Business and Personal fund would reach a 'Company Scale' level, they will either stuck in the small scale business level or they will goes out of business, or they finally realize their mistake and start to separate the funds, after that they might scale up.

Well, if Binance lost both it's US and Russia users, then it's another story. With this recent news, I suppose Binance is already prepared for leaving Russia, then they should fight harder to keep their permit to operate in the US. If they lose both Russia and US at the same time, I doubt they will survive another couple of years, even if they can get to other new countries.

Yes sure, I understand that part why he was playing safe, he is the founder of Binance, so every statements he makes will affect people views on Binance. Though I would expect something more original and valuable opinion from someone at his calibre, and for if he doesn't actually have a more valuable opinion, he doesn't need to write such generic and redundant opinion.

The answer will be very varies for each person, really depends on when they enter market and what their target profit is. However, I don't think many people think of selling all of their Bitcoin at once, they will just send part of it to take some profit. So for people who enter the market last year or so, and they have reach the target profit, I think it won't be a problem to sell some of their portfolio and take some profit and enjoy it.

Run, I don't think there are any other tip than run far far away from the War Red-Zone, the bigger the countries area the less likely the war will spread so I think it's pretty doable, you can stay in your country but not in the center of the war. If the countries is not so big, so the war will more likely to spread to the whole area, then you should run to overseas, which will be much more difficult, especially for people with less money.


I don't think anyone at war would think about business or investment, people who are at the war-zone war will run away, and people in war countries who are outside of the war-zone will trying to help and accomodate the refugee.

I think these definitions of trading is more suitable for a more traditional trading, like a commodity trading or trading related to a more traditional stuff, when one of the party is end user, or if they resell the goods have a fixed price, they are not speculating it. While most of the people who trade Bitcoin relies on the speculation. Thus for the question 'Will people ever get tired of trading Bitcoin?', I think they will when the Bitcoin price is very stable, and it's either too difficult or too long to wait for the price to go up, it's no more profitable to speculate on Bitcoin.

Could be good idea, except for the 'People' sub-board. 'People' sub-forum could be a little bit confusing, in a case when a forum member creating or promoting either a project/casino/exchange, and they use it to scam people would it be in the 'People' sub-forum or the others sub forum, this could lead to double posting. Other than that I think adding sub-forum on the Scam Accusation is a good thing, especially the 'Casino' sub forum, I saw many people has been asking for this multiple times. And even though I am not an active poster on those Sub Forum, I am still frequently reading and checking Scam Accusation, just update and avoid new scam method, so I don't think the sub-forum activity could be taken into consideration whether we need the sub-forum or not, because maybe there are many other passive readers on Scam Accusation on the sub-forum, and adding other sub-forum there would be neat.

CZ got his points, but that's not unique, it's based on the history of how market reacts to halving, and many people said the same. Tho with the current economic condition and people have more experience on the effect of halving and how Bitcoin market react to it, I doubt people will are still hoping that Bitcoin will double the price immediately after halving, most of Bitcoin speculators should already learn that Bitcoin halving effect on the market is not instant. And the thus could also make the time frame when Bitcoin will reach new ATH after the halving, probably longer than just a year.

It has been a long time since the last time I expect anything good from my government, and I think most of the people in my country felt the same. In an ideal situation ones could expect governments to fix thing including employment problem but when most of governments are corrupt, we should find our own way out. Not only that but the increase in population make the competition get more harsh everyday. Not only skills but fresh-graduates are expected to have prior working experience, this means they should already work even when they haven't graduated, it forced them to accept internship work with extremely low salary, or even no salary at all.

I am not a U.S citizen so I am not going support or oppose him on his candidacy because either way I couldn't vote.

But I think it's the same in every country, that we shouldn't believe 100% of any promise by politician, especially one that don't have any concrete plan on how make that promise real. My advice for any Bitcoin enthusiast who are going to vote for president anywhere in the world, I myself will vote next year for president of my country, rather than just supporting candidates who are saying that they support Crypto and Bitcoin, I would rather vote for candidate that has clear and visionary plan for more generic purposes, if that includes cryptocurrency or Bitcoin, than that's good, but if it's not I wouldn't mind. I wouldn't just vote for candidate who are saying they will support cryptocurrency, but when I ask them about affordable housing, affordable food, and accessible education they don't have any vision or realistic plan on it.

This is my very first time hearing that someone is confused between Bitcoin Halving and Crypto Burns. In my opinion the term is really self-explanatory. Halving with Burns is very different activity, and I don't think there is any similarity between the mechanism whatsoever. Crypto burns will reduce the total supply and sometimes also reduced the circulating supply if the coin that will be burnt is obtained by buying them back from the market, this activity will instantly and automatically affect the scarcity of the market, and this could be considered as market manipulation for some people. While Bitcoin Halving is not reducing Bitcoin supply, neither the total or circulating supply, the halving activity will not directly affect the scarcity of Bitcoin, if the demand of Bitcoin is low then the halving itself wont make Bitcoin become more 'scarce'.

The other investment like Stock is already experiencing a set back, the market cap growth wasn't as good as last year. And I am pretty surprise that the Bitcoin price was still be able to have a quick price bounce-up in this kind of economic condition. And for me with the current economic condition, if I can get my investment value doubled only in one year I would already be very happy. I don't really like speculating on Bitcoin since I prefer it to be not too volatile, but I if I enter the Bitcoin market right now, the best I could do would be 150% in a year if I am very lucky, or 130% or less if not, double my investment would be a miracle.

It's definitely not a small problem for Binance, but I doubt that Binance will fall into Crysis, even if they actually got banned in the U.S. Eventho currently U.S is on the top 5 country of Binance traffic, but it only took as much as 3,95% of the total Binance traffic, it's not small amount, but not too big to bring binance down into crysis.



I am not a regular Binance user, because I don't like overwhelming UI, but I doubt their non-US regular customer will move on from Binance even after they got banned in the US. And I suppose Binance will still run without U.S users.

If comparing stability between Bitcoin and Altcoins, Bitcoin is definitely win by a long way, and not everyone want to take an extremely high risk and manipulated market like low market cap Altcoins market.  but then again because the context in the OP is Bitcoin vs Precious Metal then if compared to Gold, Bitcoin still lose in term of price stability. But in term of security Bitcoin vs Gold I do agree that because Bitcoin is new technology and Gold has been used for decades Bitcoin is definitely a lot safer to be held, meaning that gold is easier to be stole or robbed.

Depends on what you mean by 'improve your post quality', if you use AI to generate whole/additional content for your post, than I don't think that's acceptable, AI generate the content by crawling in the internet and that might lead to Plagiarism. But if what you mean by improve your post quality is helping you with grammar and choice of word, and the whole content is based on your own thought, then it's acceptable, or at least you wouldn't do any plagiarism. However, even with not so perfect grammar and choice of word, as long as your post is understandable the reader won't mind.

Eventho I tend to agree that most governments lie in many things and all they do is enriching themselves. I wouldn't think that they are carelessly printing money that will devalue their own currency, their currency is one of the biggest bargaining power in the global politic, devaluing their own currency will not do any good for them.

Botanix Labs took those conclusion --Bitcoin need EVM -- based on the argument that Bitcoin will not fulfill it's potential just by becoming a decentralized currency, it also need to be listed in a commodity and security market, and I tend to disagree with that. Originally Bitcoin was made as peer-to-peer payment sytem to counter the hegemony of Governments controlled currency and IMF, and that's enough purpose for people to adopt Bitcoin. Adding another goal like make Bitcoin Commodity and Security will distract the main purpose, while it's not yeat achieved. And more over, currently with all the speculators buying bitcoin to gain profit, some poeple already consider it as a commodity

It's true that SEC has lost the case, but Grayscale have not win anything yet, their goal to finally get their Bitcoin Spot approved is still on a long road. It's one step closer, but SEC might find another good reason to reject Grayscale application. Don't get me wrong, I am not trying to be negative here, and this is actually a good news, I just don't want to get my hope too high, looking back at the history how SEC viewed Bitcoin.

I think bigger market cap doesn't necessarily means the asset is better. Bitcoin has bigger market cap than digital gold probably because it's easier to buy. And I don't get it when someone said some asset is better than the other, what was the factors? Does it gain more profit, or does it more stable, or more secure.

Moreover I don't find the necessity to compare any assets, since we can own all of them, depends on our needs. Like Bitcoin is good for speculation looking at the history of it's high volatility, while gold is good for storing the value, because it has been proven to be inflation-proof.

This is so true, we can't even condemn the war crimes that has been committed by their government or their military without being misunderstood as we support one side. I mean we can support the innocent civilians on both side, who are the real victim of the war.


I would tend to disagree, both Small Scale war or either World War will decrease demand in crypto, even small scale war will affect many people and those people wouldn't even slightly think about investment or crypto while they can't even get food, water or barely survive. War never has any good impact in any aspect society, politic or econom.