|
13. Cory Sandhagen
12. Holly Holm
11. Nate Landwehr
10. Maycee Barber
9. Manel Kape
8. Chidi Njokuani
7. Tucker Lutz
6. Steven Peterson
5. Trevin Giles
4. CJ Vergara
3. Manuel Torres
2. Vinicius Salvador
1. Tamires Vidal
NOT go the Full Distance 6
|
|
|
|
In one casino (with some sports promotion) we bet $10, in some other casino we bet $10 on the opposite result... did I get it wrong? We lose 50 cents per bet, but we get points for promotion. So basically we risk $20, but we can win promotional prizes. Did I get it right? Yes, you got it right. Even though you highlighted that "hedging" is prohibited, why would we do this? Don't you think that we are risking getting caught and banned from both casinos? I am not sure if that is even possible, but sports providers probably have their own ways of catching abusers. In my opinion, this is a gray area...
I tend to disagree - BC.game would only get more people interested in their site from the promo, did you know that Stake.us is paying $1 a day for Americans to play in their site? $1 a day, $365 for each player, potentially per year. There is a growing competition, so encouraging new users who see this for instance, to want to get to VIP14 is already a bonus for BC.game So no, I think this is not a gray area, on the contrary ... and yes, betting $10 with BC.game and $10 with Stake/Roobet/whoever - this is not hedging as you're not using the same site, and odds can always change and fluctuate (in this game there were tons of swings before the game even started). So all in all it's a good thing for the player but also a good thing for the house, IMO. The same picture as your avatar here is used by the owner of the video. Is it your own video actually? May I ask you why you chose to make a video instead of just explaining it in a post here? It would have been simpler and clearer for BTT users IMO. Are there wagering requirements or any another condition to withdraw the rewards won? What does mean VIP14 ? People needs to reach this rank in order to participate to this tournament? BTW when you hedge $100 on two outcomes @1.95, you are not "risking" $5. You are spending them. $100 x 0.95 - $100 = $95 - $100 = - $5  |
|
|
|
Deciding whether gambling is right or wrong for them is subjective. For non-believer to their religion will find this news as normal event because the Pastor is living on Uganda which we all know that is very hard to earn money but this is different if you are the one with same religion with them because Pastors are role model for holiness in their religion.
I will never blame the Pastor on doing gambling to earn more for his own future. Probably his earnings through his ministry is not sufficient for his daily needs especially if he has a family to feed.
You should read more carefully the news bro, it wasn't an extra mean to feed his family because he just closed his church after having made his big win of 100m NGN, Mate2237 has even opened a thread about that specific matter. In addition he won his bet thanks to a fixed game which I don't think is a moral thing approved by any church or religion. I don't know why they needed his money but I guess it was to bribe the players actually. |
|
|
|
-snip-
I think the reason, why they to much on "Slot" because the demand. I'm pretty sure they have the data player, and taken conclusion most of player playing on 'Slot'. Not only from the their casino data, but most the time Influencer, Youtuber, Streamer are playing more often on slot rather than casino-games. That's why, they more like it on slot. If they mostly look at what influencers, youtubers and streamers are playing, they will miss the good target IMO. Because those people are mostly watched by youngsters while table games are aimed at an older and more mature audience. And those two audiences don't share the same habits and interests. In addition, big stars like Drake or Snoop Dogg don't play slots when they do their streams, they play live table games. |
|
|
|
I guess everything is now to be focused towards slots, but I would really also like to see the actual Live casino be a bigger part of the tournaments like before. I like slots more and more but it can never be as nice as watching dealers live, right guys?
I agree with you bro 👍 But they maybe need to attract players who don't know very much table games, with slots. Some people are afraid by table games because they think rules are complicated and it's only for rich and educated players. Maybe the current marketing strategy is to try to attract them with good slot promotions while being less focus on table games ones. |
|
|
|
As you all will say that Still there is almost 1 and half year away for USA elections but still I want to highlight this option because here there will be almost in millions of bets that people will do and also that's based on speculations and also someone's interest. I think that this could be one of the biggest Bets we can see because a whole world Knows america and it's superpower and it's has international recognization because of it's influence to the whole world. So what are your speculations over this USA elections. And I know that everybody has their own speculations and also wins and also loose. So let's see what will happen?  Do you know which spotsbooks are already offering to bet on this event? AFAIK the republican candidate hasn't been chosen for now, many people are expecting Trump to be this candidate but it's far from being sure since he has to cope with several court cases. Biden's application is also unsure, since he seems to face health issue, so there is a lot of uncertainty for the time being. |
|
|
|
My little experience while trying to look compare these two types of bets
I could be right or wrong maybe you can share your own experience to know how it goes.
Last night was trying to bet on live matches (Sports betting) although most of the matches already started running and while some have few minutes to start, after selecting about 10 to 15 matches to place my bet it was a bit difficult due to odds were dropping as well changing so I managed to place the bet and it went successfully.
After few minutes I decide to take a look into vFootball i could also get some winning over there, Surprisingly i was wipe with their manipulation at this point i just have to quick to wait for the previously bet matches to finished running.
Have you experience the manipulations over vFootball betting?
Though i don't know if this thread already created, If yes then ref here i would be happy to locking this thread.
I don't trust very much those games to be honest, because AFAIK there is no way to see an history of the results of the matches and to watch/follow the games at an independent third party website. Hence, they could generate the results based on the bets placed by the players. For example if the biggest amount is placed on Team A, they could can make winning Team B. It would be easy money. So I prefer playing live casino games or provably fair ones instead. |
|
|
|
Good to hear that I’m not excluded in the promotion. St. Patrick contest seems temporary promotion. This might be the temporary replacement of crypto crunch. That's the second week in a row the crypto crunch tournement is not proposed actually, but last week there was a very nice promotion for slot gamblers (the Multiplier Fury) instead, this week it's another one the Lucky Clover. So it seems they have changed their marketing strategy toward slot gamblers now, and they prefer offering a new promotion/tournament each week instead of the usual crypto crunch. I'm looking forward to what will happen next month with this contest. |
|
|
|
J'ai créé un wallet sur electrum avec une passphrase et ce n'est pas possible d'installer ce wallet sur trustwallet par exemple. Bon ça peut paraître évident, mais on est dans la partie débutant.
Et je trouve qu'il faut essayer des choses pour mieux comprendre. D'autres wallets (hot/cold) permettent d'installer ce même wallet electrum si on peut y ajouter la fameuse passphrase.
D'après un tuto, si on ajoute une passphrase au pif, on est sur un wallet différent, et donc on peut imaginer créer un wallet "leurre" : le voleur sanguinaire qui veut soutirer la phrase mnémonique et la passphrase à sa victime peut se voir remettre l'accès au wallet leurre.
Est-ce que c'est correct ?
Attention les seeds générées par Electrum ne sont pas BIP39, elles ne marchent donc dans aucun autre wallet, passphrase ou pas. Tu peux d'ailleurs créer une seed Electrum avec les mots de ton choix en modifiant le fichier du dictionnaire, la seed générée restera valide dans tout wallet Electrum. En revanche Electrum accepte les seeds BIP39 (avec ou sans passphrase) et SLIP39. Avec donc la même seed et celui avec la passphrase serait le wallet leurre ? C'est ce que tu veux dire ?
C'est plus logique que ça soit l'inverse. Si le voleur obtient ta seed et ta passphrase, rien ne l'empêchera d'essayer ta seed sans passphrase. Alors que si il n'obtient que la seed, il ne pourra jamais trouver la passphrase tout seul. |
|
|
|
Oui c'est vrai mais comme le résume très bien XKCD dans ce dessin, une passphrase de quelque mots bien générée est beaucoup plus sécurisée et plus facilement mémorisable qu'un mot de passe tordu. Lorsqu'on ajoute des caractères spéciaux ou des chiffres à un mot de passe on ne fait qu'ajouter des possibilités de mots au dictionnaire, alors que lorsque l'on ajoute un mot supplémentaire on les démultiplie.  |
|
|
|
À mon avis, dans tous les cas un cold wallet sera toujours plus sécurisé que n'importe quel hot wallet. Générer sa clé hors ligne est fondamental. C'est vrai qu'ajouter une passphrase augmente le niveau de sécurité, si tu te fais cambrioler ou si tu fais l'erreur de stocker ta seed sur un support numérique, en effet, sans la passphrase on ne peut rien faire de ta seed. (même internet nous offre des exemples de gens qui stockaient leur seed + passphrase au même endroit, mais ça, ça me dépasse) Sauf que dans l'absolu, "impossible" n'est pas vrai : y'a toujours une chance qu'elle soit bruteforçable (pas certain que ce mot existe  ). Par exemple, le sujet vient d'être abordé sur le forum récemment : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5445794.msg61952460#msg61952460Si l'attaquant possède un gros dictionnaire, ou qu'il possède une ferme de GPUs, ça peut sentir mauvais. Si il a un indice quelconque sur ce que pourrait être la passphrase, ça pue. Une seed BIP39 c'est juste 12 à 24 mots d'un dictionnaire qui n'en compte que 2048. On voit donc mal comment une passphrase pourrait être plus "bruteforçable" qu'une seed. Sachant que pour la passphrase on peut utiliser n'importe quel mot de n'importe quelle langue, y compris des mots qui n'existent pas, tout caractère UTF-8 NFKD, et que l'on est pas limité à 24 mots. https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0039.mediawikiRien que pour le francais un dictionnaire courant compte plus de 50 000 mots. On est donc tres loin de quelque chose de non sécurisé je trouve. Perso je n'aurais aucune appréhension à stocker ma seed en ligne, dans une boite mail ou chez quelqu'un, en ayant une bonne passphrase stockée ailleurs. |
|
|
|
Ce midi 22 mars : les 4 premiers se répartissent ainsi 1 Gazetta avec 11 votes 2. Becassine avec 10 votes 3. MK 74 avec 9 votes 4. Ahoybrause avec 6 votes Il reste une semaine et tout peut changer. Tout ça me donne faim : j'espère qu'il y aura un concours de charlottes, parce que je fais une charlotte aux fraises qui déchire sa race "MariePO" et "tisnaislam111" ne vont pas compter, car il faut 30 earned merits et 30 activity minimum. (Pour checker le nombre de merits earned on peut utiliser https://bpip.org pour rappel). Mais il y a encore pas mal de Fr qui n'ont pas voté et qui peuvent être séduits par ta proposition. Oscar par exemple, car c'est malgré tout une photo d'une partie de ton corps entièrement nue, sans faux-ongles, sans bague, sans vernis...  |
|
|
|
I agree with JayJuanGee, it would have been nicer to be able to vote for 3 entries at least (with 3 points given to the 1st, 2 to the second and 1 to the last one, for example) because it's very hard to choose a single one. Anyway I will give my vote to Becassine. Not just because her apple pie looks as hot as she seems to be  but also because she dedicated a lot of energy to cook her cake and this pie, and to promote the contest. Bitcointalk Account: Saint-loup
My vote goes to: Becassine |
|
|
|
|
Il a peut-être fait ca avec 10 autres millions, mais ça restera toujours 1million de $ de perdu si il perd son pari. Et 39 de perdus si il le gagne. Franchement à part si il est milliardaire, mais ça se saurait, qui s'en fiche de perdre 1 million de cash de fonds personnels aujourd'hui? Surtout que si il est convaincu de son pari, il risque d'avoir besoin de tous ses fonds puisqu'il prédit un écroulement total du système financier avant l'été. Pour moi c'est juste une tentative de buzz/promo qui va mal tourner puisque l'autre est en train de prendre un avocat pour être sûr d'obtenir ses gains, et le marché est resté parfaitement flat aujourd'hui, imperturbable devant ces gesticulations d'histrions.
|
|
|
|
J'ai pas cité mes sources ! la base !  Il se trouve que c'est Balaji qui m'en a parlé après notre match de padel autour d'un komboucha. Sinon, Balanji ne bosse plus chez Coinbase me semble-t-il. (Il ne m'a pas dit ce qu'il faisait maintenant, de l'interim ou prof de yoga probablement en ces temps de remises en question post-covid) Et bien j'avoue humblement que je ne connaissais pas ce breuvage, je vais maintenant pouvoir moi aussi snober les beaufs. Pour en revenir au sujet du pari, comme ca a été relevé sur twitter, le pari de Balaji est dénué de toute logique financière, puisqu'il risque $1m contre 1BTC. Si il gagne il remportera donc un BTC qui vaudra $1m mais qui restera malgré tout un seul BTC. Si il est prêt à exposer $1m sur un tel pari, il pourrait gagner 40x fois plus en achetant maintenant 40BTC avec son million au lieu de le parier. D'autant plus que le risque qu'il perde plus de 70% de son investissement en 90 jours serait quasiment nul. |
|
|
|
 Caroline Polachek - Welcome To My Island |
|
|
|
Tu aurais pu en profiter pour mettre aussi un lien dans ton topic afin qu'on puisse se faire une idée des tenants et aboutissants de cette histoire. Au début j'ai pensé à un coup monté entre les 2 gugusses pour faire du buzz. Facile de donner un million de $ lorsqu'on sait que votre complice va vous le rendre juste après. Les gens font ce genre de chose tous les jours au bonneteau, à leur échelle. Mais il se trouve que l'olibrius qui a proposé le pari sur twitter, reconnait finalement qu'il ne dispose même pas d'assez de fonds pour acheter le BTC demandé par Balaji. Il en est du coup réduit à quémander un crowdfunding pour pouvoir prendre le pari  . Donc je pense finalement que ce n'est pas un fake, mais que Coinbase a juste profité de sa proposition initiale pour faire un gros coup de pub à Bitcoin, histoire de booster les marchés. Si BTC gagne ne serait-ce que 1000$ grâce à cette histoire, ça générera bien plus qu'un ou deux millions de dollars de profits pour Coinbase. https://fr.beincrypto.com/marches/159033/bitcoin-1-million-dollars-90-jours-pari-ancien-cto-coinbase/ |
|
|
|
Some people will rush to sell at every slight increase. A friend was telling me I want to sell, even though my money is not complete and I ask him of what profit has achieved investing in the first place? Investment is a like a future you keep hoping for the better.
Keep holding but he's eager to sell and relax his head from worries that is money has gone into extinction, lol. Increase you're having same such mentality, kindy advise!
Hold on and keep holding.
Time is coming when you will be excited about it.
Not all people see the future like you see it and it's hard to guess who will be right at the end. You seem to think that Bitcoin has room to grow more than that but other people obviously think it will drop again soon, and we can't blame them for protecting their funds, because nobody will pay back their losses, in case of a drop. Moreover, for being able to buy Bitcoin at one price you need to have people selling it at this price, so selling is a good thing to let bulls like you buying at what they consider to be a cheap price, no? I would add that you can hardly make money by just waiting for a bull run to happen, so trading could be faster. |
|
|
|
I don't agree with that, because that is exactly what I do. I have a hot wallet on my phone with usually less than $100 worth of bitcoin on it. I use this to make purchases in person with my local merchants who I know accept bitcoin. I'm buying things like groceries or electronic accessories such as spare cables, so usually well under $100. When it gets low, I top it up from a cold wallet at home.
If I plan to make a larger purchase than that in person, then I'll either load up my hot wallet in advance or take a hardware wallet and take it with me, depending on the value we are talking about.
You are very lucky to have some local merchants accepting Bitcoin. They accept payments with 0 confirmations or they are using LN? With a so low limit you are certainly rich and patient enough to top up your hot wallet several times a week but I don't think it's a very convenient limit for most people. If you need to receive or send funds to an exchange or a gambling site $100 won't be enough for example. Personally I don't think it's very safe to use his cold wallet for doing all his transactions, but I understand people could do the opposite, especially if they don't use LN. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
