If you are ready to make some concessions on your first requirement you should try web3 decentralized sportsbooks because they are the only ones unable to lock/steal your funds like bookmaker.xyz, overtimemarkets.xyz, dexwin.bet, blockchainbets.club you can also try exchange bettings they are way less likely to lock your funds than a common sportsbook even if they are able to do it.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5415332
But if you prefer to stick with traditional ones, Sportsbet has a pretty good reputation here.

Usually the vigorish taken by the bookmakers is higher for small leagues of small countries, it means the RTP of those bets are smaller and it's hard for the punters to make profits on them. It's because there is less datas on those leagues available but also because matches are more likely to be fixed, which can lead to big losses for the bookmakers. Sumo wrestling had a very bad reputation for that, but I had recently the good surprise to see this sporting discipline appearing at some sportsbooks.

I don't get what you mean precisely, you've first replied to my post 3 days ago and then you have deleted your message for unkown reasons before I can answer you , and now you are posting again on this message... https://ninjastic.space/post/63321597
I think you didn't understand what I was referring too. It was sarcastic actually. People don't promote services in their signature for free you know, that's why they often post on random topics they don't really care.

Yes it's called the survivorship bias, if you only listen to successful guys you won't figure out the real difficulties because they've skills or advantages, sometimes they don't even realize themselves, you don't have or because they've just been lucky. It creates a skewed perspective where you're only seeing the winners, not the countless others who faced the same challenges but didn't make it. It's like watching a highlight reel of a successful gambler who hit the jackpot. What you don't see are the countless bets they lost before that big win. Learning from failures and struggles is just as important as studying success stories.

Concerning OP's friend story, a golden rule in trading is to try to buy low and to sell high and to avoid doing the opposite. So when you invest at a high price after a pump it's usually not far away from the top, so you need to be very cautious.

No KYC for crypto players, only means one thing in English : No KYC is required when you are a crypto player. Doing the opposite, especially after accepting deposits, is a scam, and certainly a criminal offense in most countries even if they have written something else in small characters somewhere in their ToS. Cryptoplayer111 is not a company he is just a random consumer who has decided to play at this casino because they claimed(and still claim) to not require KYC when you play with cryptos. I hope Crypto Guru will lower their grade, because they're obviously dishonest and untrustworthy. In addition they use a similar name to a real No KYC casino (because it's a Web3 one) Just.bet, so I guess they do it on purpose.

Bof elle n'est généralement pas tres bonne, donc ça risque d'être compliqué pour elle face à Panot qui se laisse difficilement impressionner. Je pense qu'elle n'arrivera pas à en placer une et qu'elle se fera agonir d'invectives comme d'habitude.
Si elle était douée pour la politique ça ferait longtemps qu'elle aurait percé je pense, quand elle a rejoint Zemmour c'était censé le booster dans les intentions de vote, mais ça n'a rien changé, voir ça l'a même affaibli. Si elle a quitté la politique durant plusieurs années ce n'est pas sans raison à mon avis.
En l'occurrence, on voit rarement des politiques réagir aussi mal à des questions aussi banales, cette séquence reste désastreuse pour elle :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZ3FQ9l5eGU

14. Leon Edwards
13. Alexandre Pantoja
12. Shavkat Rakhmonov
11. Paddy Pimblett
10.
9. Bryce Mitchell
8. Irene Aldana
7. Cody Garbrandt
6. Casey O’Neill
5. Dustin Jacoby
4. Tagir Ulanbekov
3. Andre Fili
2. Martin Buday
1. Randy Brown

NOT go the Full Distance 7

Game 1:  48, 9'
Game 2:  48, 9'

Le plus effroyable dans cette histoire serait le motif de l'agression : la victime aurait osé se plaindre d'une agression sexuelle de la part du frère de l'une d'entre elles qui aurait décidé de la tabasser en représailles et pour la faire taire. Le déroulement des faits n'est pas moins choquant puisque malgré la méfiance de la victime, c'est une amie à elle qui l'aurait appâtée pour la conduire dans le guet apens.

https://www.valeursactuelles.com/regions/auvergne-rhone-alpes/rhone/lyon/faits-divers/lyon-une-adolescente-tabassee-par-trois-jeunes-filles-une-plainte-deposee

Dumb Money qui retrace l'histoire des Wall Street Bets guys et de leur short squeeze massif de l'action GameStop est assez épatant. Le film essaye de montrer l'envers du décor de cette affaire et c'est assez incroyable de voir que le leader du groupe Reddit a vraiment réussi à faire trembler Wall Street à lui tout seul avec de simples posts et vidéos sur internet. L'histoire est folle, mais elle montre l'arrogance et les arrangements des whales de Wall Street qui se prennent pour la "smart money" essorant la "dumb money" des petits porteurs. Le film offre un vrai suspense puisqu'il suit le cours de l'action (stratosphérique) durant les événements et la valeur du portefeuille des protagonistes qui ont investi toutes leurs économies et qui sont confrontés au dilemme cornélien de vendre et de devenir riches ou de holder encore pour pouvoir mettre aux tapis les gros fonds d'investissements qui jouent contre eux en shortant l'action.

https://www.allocine.fr/film/fichefilm_gen_cfilm=290002.html

Je ne sais pas si elle est aussi chrétienne mais ça me fait penser à la passionaria anti-islam(isme) Zineb El Rhazoui à qui Pécresse a retiré son prix Simone Veil la semaine dernière pour avoir retwitté un tweet comparant l'attaque de Gaza à la Shoah et les Israéliens aux nazis. Elle a répondu à Pécresse de le garder si il impliquait de ne pas pouvoir critiquer l'"extrémisme juif". C'est un sacré revirement de sa part.

https://www.huffingtonpost.fr/politique/article/zineb-el-rhazoui-repond-a-valerie-pecresse-sur-le-prix-simone-veil-que-la-presidente-de-region-lui-a-retire_226941.html
 

Hacking, scamming and Ponzi schemes are precisely what nocoiners and gold bugs blame Bitcoin for. So I don't think it's specific to altcoins unfortunately Bitcoin is maybe the highest secure blockchain but it's not safer than gold or cash money while it takes huge fees for every transaction and consumes much resources. And please don't say you can use Lightning Network if you want to save transaction fees because it's wrong, almost no platforms, merchants or crypto users accept LN payments. You talk about campaigns but which one pays its participants through LN nowadays for example?

La faille a été rapidement traitée mais certains medias affirment que près d'un demi-million de dollars ont quand même eu le temps d'être dérobés ($484k).
Le hack a semble-t-il eu lieu en pleine journée, durant les heures de bureaux de Ledger, en milieu de semaine, mais le vol aurait certainement pu être plus important si cela s'était passé durant le week-end ou même la nuit.

https://bitcoinist.com/ledger-supply-chain-attack-over-480000-drained/

To be honest, it would really bore me to have to care about that bet during several months and to waste transaction fees for nothing at the end if your actress is not qualified. So I have a counterproposal, if Sandra Hüller is not nominated, your bet will be replaced by another one, on another actress, with other odds then. It would be a kind of joker.
So you would need to choose 2 actresses instead of one and we would need to agree with the payout of the 2nd choice. Of course if Hüller is nominated, your 2nd choice will be voided, and won't count anymore for the victory.  
I would have a joker too, but my joker would be Gladstone Lily   LOL  
If our joker is not qualified either, there is no 3rd joker, and the bet will continue to the end.

My other proposal is to change the bet into a bet against Gladstone at 1:1 in case of failure of Hüller's nomination (while Gladstone being nominated), instead of a 2nd actress bet. That is to say I would pay you 2mbtc(your stake+mine) if Gladstone doesn't win the best actress award and I would keep your 1mbtc stake if she wins. If she's not nominated I would send back your stake(1mbtc).

It's not the same thing as a sportsbook bet because at sportsbooks you would lose your stake if any other actress win, while here you would only lose $50 if Gladstone is the winner, and nothing else, so it's not the same thing. Especially if you think Killers of the Flower Moon is not good...
Anyway if Sandra Hüller is your favorite in your heart and your inner conviction it wouldn't be funny to bet on someone else you don't trust and you don't like simply because she is better rated by bookmakers (who are wrong most of the time).
So if you still want to bet on her I'm ready to take your bet at those odds (ie 7.50). It means it would be a 6.5 to 1 paying bet (6.5:1). If you win I would pay you 6.5 what you would pay me if I win. For $50, I would pay you $325. On a sportbook you would pay $50 to bet and receive $375(7.5x) if you win because you would receive your stake back($50) along with your winnings($325)(6.5x). Here you don't pay anything to bet, so you keep your stake but you receive the winnings only(6.5x). What do you think of that?
If you prefer betting on Emma Stone, I can accept it but only if you really like the movie and the actress's performance. So we would need to wait for its release.

The page is no longer available and seems to have been removed but we still can find this announcement from FUNtoken of an Upbit listing scheduled for the 14th December 0:00UTC. I don't really understand why it's a so bullish news to be honest, since more volume doesn't mean more buying than selling orders automatically for me. But in the long run, I guess it increases the visibility and the popularity of the token around the world at least.

https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://funtoken.io/funtoken-celebrates-its-listing-on-upbit-exchange-a-new-horizon-of-opportunities/
https://archive.is/GhCXd

If I was ready to use an extension, I would use it directly on my desktop computer, because it's more convenient to use a large screen and a physical keyboard than a smartphone like an ape. But I'm scared by it, because plugins can steal sensitive datas like passwords and display misleading informations like fake recipient/deposit addresses for example. And even if a plugin is safe, it can be hacked one day. So I prefer to use a standalone app for connecting Web3 dApps and validating transactions from the dApp. In addition I can check all interactions, I am sure there won't be hidden interactions in the background with the plugin.

Pourquoi dis-tu cela exactement je n'ai pas compris.
En tous cas l'attaque arrive (fortuitement ou pas) à un assez mauvais moment puisque Trust Wallet avait sorti il y a un peu moins de 2mois une nouvelle version qui avait pas mal de problèmes et qui ne permettait plus à beaucoup d'utilisateurs(tous?) de se connecter à leurs dApps habituelles. Une mise à jour avait résolu le problème par la suite, mais il est fort probable que beaucoup d'utilisateurs se soient rabattus sur Ledger à ce moment-là et qu'ils n'étaient pas encore revenus vers TW au moment de cette attaque

Accidental drops, damages, software/hardware issues and physical loss are not critical if you have safely stored your seed elsewhere, especially onto a non-digital medium like a simple sheet of paper for example. Only a theft could put your funds at risk, if you have no mean to access your back-up seed quickly. So I wonder why people are so scared they try to dissuade a random Korean(we are not talking about a poor guy from a poor third world country) to store 4 mbtc on a smartphone into a Smasung wallet. Bitcoin has no chance to be adopted one day if people need to be computer scientists and to have an airgapped computer along with another one in order to use it, sadly. Losing 3.9mbtc is sad but it's not the end of the world if it happens(which is very unlikely btw). Most of common bank apps are certainly way less safe than this app, and nobody cares about it. Unless you use it to store amounts of money you can't afford to lose, the only real concern I see for this kind of wallet is the privacy since Samsung company could be aware of the transactions one day.

Yes I don't understand why nobody is talking about it here. This big pump is very surprising and is changing odds for its final price at the end of the month and the year then. Weirdly(or not) the only one noticing it and talking about it here, doesn't wear a signature, it's a little bit disappointing. Have you heard of some news explaining that? Or some whales have just fill their bags?