Bitcoincrash, bahahahaaaa, that’s good.

I don’t sell.

I don’t lie.

I may be wrong, but the odds are great that I’m right.  

Bet big on Dr. Wright!  Bet big on BitcoinCrash.  Haha.  I LOVE the name, cause BCC will crash the Bitcoin party.  

I think something fishy is going in this project. Devs are really quiet for weeks, there is no feedback in all channels. My guess is they are having trouble with delivering or they are not planning to deliver at all.

This is an authentic email from Satoshi to Hearn dating back to 2009-2010.

So...

If adoption is looking to go global but you cannot raise the coin supply hardcap, and [Satoshi] prices have to stay similar with existing currencies, then what do you do?  



This fun puzzle piece may help you unwrap the steganographic message to the potential 10,000+ fold coin.  

There’s also another coin I would buy if I had the BTC which, if I’m not imagining things, could go up 10,000+ fold (that’s not a typo).

I posted it on this thread but due to its nuclear potential I wrapped it neatly inside a steganographic wrapper.

Invest in a cracker jacks box decoder ring.  It’s gonna be the best investment eva’.

If someone can quote & validate these details it would be appreciated.

Address:

Message:

Signature:

Huh what?

I am not proposing infinitely sized blocks, so I obviously acknowledge the concept of a too-high limit as being plausible.

If you want to continue the conversation, please be very explicit about what problem you think needs solving, and how whatever solution you're proposing solves that problem.

We might agree or disagree on both of those points, but we won't have a productive conversation if you can't say what problem you are trying to solve.

To summarize my position: I see one big problem that need solving:

Supporting lots (millions, eventually billions) of people transacting in Bitcoin.
  Ideally at as low a cost as possible, as secure as possible, and in the most decentralized and censorship-resistant way possible.

It is hard to get consensus on HOW to solve that problem, because no solution is obviously lowest cost, most secure, and most decentralized all at the same time, and different people assign different weights to the importance of those three things.

My bias is to "get big fast" -- I think the only way Bitcoin thrives is for lots of people to use it and to be happy using it. If it is a tiny little niche thing then it is much easier for politicians or banks to smother it, paint it as "criminal money", etc. They probably can't kill it, but they sure could make life miserable enough to slow down adoption by a decade or three.

"Get big fast" has been the strategy for a few years now, ever since the project became too famous to fly under the radar of regulators or the mainstream press.

The simplest path to "get big fast" is allowing the chain to grow. All the other solutions take longer or compromise decentralization (e.g. off-chain transactions require one or more semi-trusted entities to validate those off-chain transactions). I'm listening very carefully to anybody who argues that a bigger chain will compromise security, and those concerns are why I am NOT proposing an infinite maximum block size.

There is rough consensus that the max block size must increase. I don't think there is consensus yet on exactly HOW or WHEN.









http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=21-01-2015#986194

 "substitutes for Bitcoin are altcoins, sidechains, off-chain transactions, credit cards, wire transfers….."  http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=21-01-2015#986357

Wait, what! My theory isn't included? --> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Harris_Simons

And BTW, most people are not losing "money".  They're losing paper profits which is not quite the same socially and economically speaking.  That "money" will be transferred to others just like it was once transferred to those losing it.  

Just like stocks, it's a zero sum game.  

And the writing has been on the wall a long time - people chose to assume the risk so they have to take the loss with the same grace they boasted about their easy "moon" profits.

Most will lose all their BTC.  It's getting too complex and unstable already.  It's just a simple reality people need to face and diversify according to their risk tolerance.

A major namecoin client upgrade is almost here, just been merged to master branch. It is based purely on latest bitcoin core v0.13.1 with an integrated 'Manage Names' tab for easy and simple namecoin names and id management, registration, sending names, receiving names, trading for namecoins.