The mission is praiseworthy and this had been attempted by bundle of undertakings as of now however as far as anyone is concerned, theres extremely no known fruitful task as of not long ago. in the event that you can't hit your ico targets, would you say you are going to proceed with your venture or the destiny will be much the same as others?
Yes I have my sympathy also with the team that are doing this project. The concept is very good since this is all about Renewable Energy Platform for most it will conserve the Natural Energy that will going to destroy natural resources over time. Hope other team will follow a concept like this. That's up to market forces. If you can produce renewable energy at competitive prices it will be consumed and if it's too expensive standard energy sources will be used. Our partner project is already producing energy at competitive price. we are going to introduce many interesting apps based on our platform like TerraGreen Token Exchange TerraGeen Bank TerraGreen STO Plarform TerraGreen Wallet TerraGreen Token Creation and more This feels like you lack focus for a project that is starting out as a renewable energy trading platform. Why do you try to be an energy trading platform and a STO platform at the same time? Just get one thing right at a time. Thaks for your concern but you are getting wrong. TerraGreen Platform or TerraGreen Coin itself does not belong to STO. TerraGreen Coin belongs to platform coin and it is introduced to fuel TerraGreen Platform. We are going to develop a TerraGreen STO platform (one of our product) for Security Tokens which will be backed by real energy. Currently, we are making very important changes as per many big industry experts review and after that, it will be crystal clear project. The security tokens will be backed by real energy? Can you explain how that is supposed to work? And why is it a security token? |
|
|
|
Hello, I am representative of icoholder.com company. You have been selected and added to icoholder.com. Find your project on our website and go through verification to add more information. https://icoholder.com/en/anti-aging-coin-28926What is the process of getting selected by icoholder.com? Does every project get selected or do you really "select" projects? |
|
|
|
It is a strong resistance, hence Ravencoin will have to test it so many times till the beautiful day on which the coin will break the resistance. Strong resistance often requires so many test round to break it. This is second time when Raven is approaching 1k satoshi range. Last time we saw it returning back which we can call dump. But overall market's situation is looking different now. Another possible scenario can be it to find support at higher level this time. I have never seen this active twitter handle of Ravencoin this frequent communication can show difference.
Prediction is a risky game, some sort of risky game. No one can predict exactly or even nearly exact things from time to time. Of course, investors should have determinant stance for their investment decisions. I don't think anyone can predict the next bull market by comparing patterns to the last bull market. The last bull market, for example, started despite the legal uncertainty. The next one could get started because of some positive legal implications.
What you can do is gather as much information as possible and derive proper conclusions based on that. |
|
|
|
The first few months or half of the year will be one expenses. Even if the project is mega interesting, it will not be able to be popular the next day ... this is the law of marketing. Therefore, you need to be patient and do not require return on your investment in the first month of the platform.
it is logical that you should not expect that the investors of the platform will start earning literally from the first day. It is clear that the platform should become popular with users and only then investors will begin to receive a really serious profit. If they set aside part of the revenue as dividends there should be payments from day one or how are they planning to do it? I think it would be logical to distribute net profit, i.e. income-expenses. But in such cases, do not wait for payments from the first days. Usually you are right and dividends should come from net profit, but I have read several times now that some tokens offer revenue sharing. It should be profit sharing as you say. I have also seen that for keeping tokens on a wallet they make a profit, this is done so that when entering the exchange, it does not lose its price. Yes but the dividends that are supposed to be paid to token holders should only be distributed if there is a net profit. |
|
|
|
Cryptopia: Update: We have transitioned 24% of all wallets to our new secure servers. Once the read only site is online, we will be keeping users up to date on which wallets have been checked and secured via the coin info page.
I still can not log in at Cryptopia... Maybe you don't even want to log in at Cryptopia  Do they have any plans to pay everything back to their customers? They have control over their exchange again but still need time to get everything sorted and prepared to open up again to the users. Hopefully soon more will become clear  So all police investigations are done already? Otherwise I don't think they should be allowed to resume trading. Has the police been involved? 'So all police investigations are done already?' -- finished about a fortnight ago. 'Do they have any plans to pay everything back to their customers?' -- apparently. I'm logged in at this second. No problem there. You can reset passwords and 2FAs. But everything else seems 'paused.' Appreciate your response in such detail and thank you also for sharing the article! |
|
|
|
Cryptopia: Update: We have transitioned 24% of all wallets to our new secure servers. Once the read only site is online, we will be keeping users up to date on which wallets have been checked and secured via the coin info page.
I still can not log in at Cryptopia... Maybe you don't even want to log in at Cryptopia Do they have any plans to pay everything back to their customers? They have control over their exchange again but still need time to get everything sorted and prepared to open up again to the users. Hopefully soon more will become clear So all police investigations are done already? Otherwise I don't think they should be allowed to resume trading. Has the police been involved? |
|
|
|
The first few months or half of the year will be one expenses. Even if the project is mega interesting, it will not be able to be popular the next day ... this is the law of marketing. Therefore, you need to be patient and do not require return on your investment in the first month of the platform.
it is logical that you should not expect that the investors of the platform will start earning literally from the first day. It is clear that the platform should become popular with users and only then investors will begin to receive a really serious profit. If they set aside part of the revenue as dividends there should be payments from day one or how are they planning to do it? I think it would be logical to distribute net profit, i.e. income-expenses. But in such cases, do not wait for payments from the first days. Usually you are right and dividends should come from net profit, but I have read several times now that some tokens offer revenue sharing. It should be profit sharing as you say. |
|
|
|
A lot of factors influence the situation, the market, competitors and of course advertising, the better it is, the faster the project will develop
Marketing should come first. Unfortunately, not all developers understand this. Maybe due to the fact that they are more focused on the technical aspects of the project. But do not forget about marketing. Marketing should come first? What are you going to market if you don't have anything to sell? |
|
|
|
The mission is praiseworthy and this had been attempted by bundle of undertakings as of now however as far as anyone is concerned, theres extremely no known fruitful task as of not long ago. in the event that you can't hit your ico targets, would you say you are going to proceed with your venture or the destiny will be much the same as others?
Yes I have my sympathy also with the team that are doing this project. The concept is very good since this is all about Renewable Energy Platform for most it will conserve the Natural Energy that will going to destroy natural resources over time. Hope other team will follow a concept like this. That's up to market forces. If you can produce renewable energy at competitive prices it will be consumed and if it's too expensive standard energy sources will be used. Our partner project is already producing energy at competitive price. we are going to introduce many interesting apps based on our platform like TerraGreen Token Exchange TerraGeen Bank TerraGreen STO Plarform TerraGreen Wallet TerraGreen Token Creation and more This feels like you lack focus for a project that is starting out as a renewable energy trading platform. Why do you try to be an energy trading platform and a STO platform at the same time? Just get one thing right at a time. |
|
|
|
Not only price but also volume is constantly increasing which will be helpful to sustain all the gain for short to mid term. If you look at any market you will see same pattern being repeated like it was back in March 2017, how bull run started. Ravencoin has been doubled in few days once again and breaking 500 satoshi in awesome for the moment.
I don't think anyone can predict the next bull market by comparing patterns to the last bull market. The last bull market, for example, started despite the legal uncertainty. The next one could get started because of some positive legal implications. |
|
|
|
Cryptopia: Update: We have transitioned 24% of all wallets to our new secure servers. Once the read only site is online, we will be keeping users up to date on which wallets have been checked and secured via the coin info page.
I still can not log in at Cryptopia... Maybe you don't even want to log in at Cryptopia Do they have any plans to pay everything back to their customers? |
|
|
|
The first few months or half of the year will be one expenses. Even if the project is mega interesting, it will not be able to be popular the next day ... this is the law of marketing. Therefore, you need to be patient and do not require return on your investment in the first month of the platform.
it is logical that you should not expect that the investors of the platform will start earning literally from the first day. It is clear that the platform should become popular with users and only then investors will begin to receive a really serious profit. If they set aside part of the revenue as dividends there should be payments from day one or how are they planning to do it? |
|
|
|
After entering the stock exchange, what amount is predicted for the token?
I think that no one tell you even approximately, because there are so many indicators that influence in price after listing.. I hope that Raizer get good listing There are also factors that influence the price which are hard to discern. If you consider the prices of ETH or BTC, even for those it is hard to say why they are worth what they are worth. Mining cost or whatever, nobody really knows what to use. |
|
|
|
Investing in cryptocurrency is considered the most risky type of investment. But also the most profitable. That is why thousands of new investors come here every month.
Thousands of new users come in and only a few dozen investors make money ... now there are a lot of scammers and scam projects on the market. Contrary to all fraudulent projects, there are those that bring investors not a bad income, but they are becoming less and less every day. You're right. Really profitable projects every day is becoming less and less. But this does not mean that there is no chance to profit from their investments. just need more luck and you will definitely get lucky! Nobody will definitely get lucky. If you are not willing to put in the effort to find projects with strong fundamentals, you will keep losing. It is more difficult these days as there are so many. It didn't matter which one you picked in the old days, they just all went up. |
|
|
|
I’ve already seen several projects of such sort. How are you going to lure potential clients away from them?
There were a lot of “projects of such sort” at the peak of the ICO, but there’re few of them now. In comparison with them, FortFC has already made great progress. So what’s this progress? Personally, I can’t see a ready-made product yet, so it’s hard to say that there’s some progress. You know, I haven’t come across a single project in the crypto industry which would offer the users to try out the demo version at the ICO stage. It seems you haven't been around for a long time then. There have been a couple of projects with prototypes or demos during the ICO stages. |
|
|
|
visit our website for more information link in the ANN thread
I can't find any details about your team though, will it be added later? It'll be very good idea to add info that can be tracked back in real world, if your claim about professionals is true, then it'll be an easy thing to provide Also a good idea is to call token a token, and not a coin. I had to waste 15 seconds of my time now There is a difference between the two as a token is something that gives you access or represents value of an underlying. |
|
|
|
If someone wants to visit, and see proof of said 'DIAMONDS and CERTIFICATION' in person for the backing of this ICO (which should not be a problem). I mean if one was to spend lots of money, should have no problem letting said person be able to verify before dropping lets say millions or even tens of thousands of investment.
We're not an ICO, but the question's fair. Well, verifying the vaults in person is quite tricky, which is the reason why we have audits by IDEX. We want to make sure investors have everything they need to feel safe using DIAM! That leads to all customers having to trust IDEX. In the end it doesn't matter whether you have to trust IDEX or you. There's a risk that audits lack honesty or precision. As a fellow crypto investor: How is trusting IDEX different than trusting any other stablecoin issuer? The thing with asset-backed and money-backed currencies is that --at any point-- you need to trust someone. Otherwise there are other alternatives, but you're exposed to volatility. Absolutely right. I wasn't trying to make a point against a stable coin issued by IDEX. I more or less said what you said. |
|
|
|
This is - very interesting project. But there are a lot of new projects online now. You can run into scammers. How to register a wallet? And how to purchase tokens?
The blockchain will allow real objective evaluations to specialists - this is the main difference between our project and similar ones. You better use MyEtherWallet Specialists can offer their services on your platform and the pricing will be done by your customers? It's just about supply and demand then? |
|
|
|
This journey becoming more interesting current streak is looking more solid with more power. Raven have big potential so it can achieve more better position in coming days and this time price will get stable on decent floor.
It has a lot of potential and I hope they can gain traction and get the word out. This is a solid one that could rise further over time. |
|
|
|
it seems to me the most important thing is to show who is behind the development and what is his experience in writing code. and you gave a lot of unnecessary information that does not reveal anything about your project. but this is my advice, you certainly can not listen.
As this has just been posted today it should be waited a little bit whether questions will be raised and in how far they get answered. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
