Bitcoin Forum
September 07, 2024, 07:51:56 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 ... 122 »
161  Other / Meta / Re: wolwoo's merit source desire on: December 06, 2019, 08:55:45 AM
Who are you to judge me?
First of all, look at you, fuck you, piranhas.

I'm not answering you and gangs

Only admin-staff can ask me questions

But the whole forum can mock your attitude and distasteful behavior.

Are you and TOAA roommates?
162  Other / Meta / Re: Cryptotalk campaign thread is a mirror echo of the yobit thread... on: December 06, 2019, 07:41:16 AM


The whole reason the threads linked were closed is because of lack of payment, and no actual guarantee of payment in a rational/steady schedule.  This creates massive problems, and a whole pile of spam over something that should not be an issue.


The thread was actually locked by me to control the spam being posted in it by participants. Admins have been messaged twice now about payments and their wallet being filled.

No response so far. Participants are free to leave if they fear not being paid. I wish I could guarantee the payments but I have 0 control over it.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5188200.0 Here is the list of banned participants. 472 and counting. Quite a few of these users will be on the blacklist as well.

I feel for ya man.... and everyone else as well....   Yobit is very good at ignoring requests for a response.      You have definitely done a very good job thus far at keeping the participants in line.    I only created this thread here, mainly because from my understanding, its a serious topic that relates to the forum and in a place where the words on the table stay on the table.

Im glad others chimed in about the similar experience with the old sig campaign.    Its just too much like Deja Vu.
163  Other / Meta / Re: wolwoo's merit source desire on: December 05, 2019, 04:17:26 AM

It was his behavior.  It was his words.  Its your actions.


Today's record of his post history makes it self evident why I feel the way I feel; on top of the fact that he was making unsubstantiated pseudo-claims of racisim and whatever else.

He needs to own up to it.  

Don't go jumping to the defense of someone positively connected to a banned person.

Someone who responds when un-provoked like he does/did; and in the manner that he did (containing what could unambiguously could be considered threats) does not contain the cores of "a source of merit" in my eyes.


wait I thought you were evaluating wolwoo's application, was I your original target all along ?  Grin

Regardless of who you are criticizing at least get your facts straight, the only allegation raised against Wolwoo is that he included goraset in his trust list, which I believe is now removed...



Yeah... I definitely had a lapse in applying the proper statements to the proper person.

I definitely was not targeting you, but the applicant of the merit source.

For everyone, please see my revised statement of the previous post of mine in this quote, I have made the changes in bolt text....

the DT fight has gone on for a bit.   Multiple people involved... soo many people discussing that I am not entirely sure who it was between.

Sorry for the misread.... I think your hilarious candor showed you knew my mistake in that post xD

Ya, it was the fact that he jumped extremely fast on the defense of that person.... means he must have a horse in that race so to speak.
164  Other / Meta / Re: Ban evasion by DT1 member - please permaban account - case 2 on: December 05, 2019, 04:05:09 AM
How can it be ban evading when otto_diesel's message predates that of the banned user Huh

What a very 'Democratic National Committee' level of critical thinking you have there good sir.....
165  Other / Meta / Re: wolwoo's merit source desire on: December 05, 2019, 04:00:49 AM
The evidence in this thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5206971.0

is not insignificant.

Whomever decides this, please understands that there have been some interesting bans and ban evasion uncovered that this person is supporting which is an alt of a banned member.  


The way it unfolded;  in my eyes, is highly suspicious and merits careful consideration in the matter of him being a merit source.

Just for the record, wolwoo is admittedly showing some emotional reactions in defense of a local section, but he has no connection whatsoever to the allegations raised in any of the threads you are quoting...

Some people are attacking DT1 members for merely including (I'm guessing) goraset in their trust lists for a while, but truth be told, it's very unlikely that these DT1 members from the Turkish section were even aware that goraset may or may not have had a few alt accounts which were banned (it's the first time I've ever seen it brought up anywhere on the forum)...

Some people who have recently lost their DT1 status are now digging up years old threads to make some flimsy connections, and then accusing people indirectly based on Trust list inclusions; thus leading to Wolwoo's emotional warfare in those threads  Wink

Regardless I congratulate Marlboroza for his detective work, I presume Turkish section might now be the most closely scrutinized part of all internet forums everywhere...

Its your behavior.  Its your words.  Its your actions.


Today's record of your post history makes it self evident why I feel the way I feel; on top of the fact that you are making unsubstantiated pseudo-claims of racisim and whatever else.

Own up to it.  

Don't go jumping to the defense of someone positively connected to a banned person as to be a previously banned person.  This is why I think you are suspicious.  FYI: old information being "dug up" to prove someone is indeed a previously banned member insults you somehow?.... wow...  I just do not know how to provide a response that is more logical than this very paragraph.

Someone who responds when un-provoked like you do/did; and in the manner that you did (containing what could unambiguously could be considered threats) does not contain the cores of "a source of merit" in my eyes.
166  Other / Meta / Re: Ban evasion by DT1 member - please permaban account - case 2 on: December 05, 2019, 01:06:40 AM
What if you don't have a job? I was going to watch a movie and I'm dealing with your bullshit.

At 2am in Turkey?

Note hes requesting to be a merit source.  Look at all the "support" in his thread......
167  Other / Meta / Re: wolwoo's merit source desire on: December 05, 2019, 12:43:45 AM
The evidence in this thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5206971.0

is not insignificant.

Whomever decides this, please understands that there have been some interesting bans and ban evasion uncovered that this person is supporting which is an alt of a banned member. 


The way it unfolded;  in my eyes, is highly suspicious and merits careful consideration in the matter of him being a merit source.
168  Other / Meta / Re: Ban evasion by DT1 member - please permaban account - case 2 on: December 05, 2019, 12:35:39 AM
....insane illogical comments....

you might want to look up the definition of "kidnapping", then "abduct"...   now look at "banish" which is what "ban" is shorthand for... and realize it has an action and reasoning; also take a peek at "blacklist"  Roll Eyes    Definitions of words from the dictionary are very interesting and unique things aren't they?
169  Other / Meta / Re: Cryptotalk campaign thread is a mirror echo of the yobit thread... on: December 05, 2019, 12:16:03 AM
my prediction is it may be a short delay until the payout wallet is filled (1 month or so total)...  but it will happen again.  
And the delay will increase....   maybe not the first time, but once the delay increases for the first time, it is almost certain to get longer thereafter.

This is just a prediction.
170  Other / Meta / Re: Cryptotalk campaign thread is a mirror echo of the yobit thread... on: December 04, 2019, 10:47:07 PM
A while ago, I opened a little thread titled "Shouldn't bounty managers clean up spam posts in their thread?".

I think this is exactly what bounty manager yahoo62278 has been doing in this campaign, as a self-declared quality checker. If they'd all work like him, the number of spam posts would be decimated.

If people are indeed keeping a thread alive for sig bounty reasons, I'd suggest you to report them to yahoo62278 and report them to the mods as well.

The whole reason the threads linked were closed is because of lack of payment, and no actual guarantee of payment in a rational/steady schedule.  This creates massive problems, and a whole pile of spam over something that should not be an issue.

What happened to me in the past was a degredation from payments anytime, to the account being topped up each month, to them getting longer and longer between with one payment being nearly one year after the previous one.

I already know the campaigns posters now are being cleaned up compared to before.... as ill repeat:  the campaign manager (yahoo) is not in question.... hasn't been....   If I were complaining about spam, this thread would have a completely different content.

Spam is a byproduct of them having a signature campaign as described just above.

See what I am talking about now?  Them simply having the campaign is causing spam.  The irony.
171  Other / Meta / Re: Cryptotalk campaign thread is a mirror echo of the yobit thread... on: December 04, 2019, 10:33:23 PM
Same group's campaign, same results.

I beg to differ.  Sure there have been a ton of shitposting spammers wearing the signature, but this time around the spam has been dramatically reduced.  Yahoo62278 has been doing a remarkable job finding and banning the most egregious offenders.  He's not going to detect them all, which is why he's been accepting help from the community.  If you see someone spamming to spike their post count for their Yobit signature, report them to Yahoo62278, or use the report to mod link, or preferably both.

All in all, this time around it's been a far cry from the level of spam we saw earlier this year.  


Anyone in on an idea on how we can get to the core of who controls yobit and ultimately bring some transparency to a very shady company?

If anyone knows, they aren't talking.  Keeping yourself anonymous on the internet is a pretty difficult task, but not impossible.  It takes some skill and understanding, and apparently the folks behind Yobit have done pretty decent job of it so far, so they must know what they're doing.  For most of us it's pretty hard to track down someone who's that skilled at keeping themselves anonymous.  They haven't pulled an exit scam, so there hasn't been much motivation or effort put into investigating the owners' identities.  

Well, this is about yobit in general, and not at all about how the managers handled the campaigns.  They do what they can, and probably do exactly what they are paid to do.

The problem is from what I gather, bitcointalk requires a campaign manager to be exactly that.  A campaign manager.

In yobit's case, they manage the campaign and pre-pay a person to simply be a 'public interface'.  Im curious how much they paid yahoo.... just curiosity... nothing meant by it personally....   to be clear, this is all about yobit and how shady they are.... and the aura that hovers around them.
172  Other / Meta / Re: Cryptotalk campaign thread is a mirror echo of the yobit thread... on: December 04, 2019, 10:09:57 PM
I think he meant 30 pages not 300 and was linking to this thread :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5188047.0

That is the CryptoTalk thread that fell apart... 30 pages...  And Cryptotalk == Yobit


This link is the Yobit thread from before.   Start at the end and just go backwards.... you'll see it.

Ooooh, I would love this.  For a long time I've been dying to know who runs Yobit and what their offices look like, if they even have offices.  I've always had an image of a couple of unkempt Russians with about three laptops running the exchange.  And never have I heard any details about what their operation is really like.  They're about the least transparent exchange in existence, and it blows my mind that they've been operating so long and either haven't failed or haven't pulled an exit scam. 

I'm no internet detective, but I do believe there are some good ones here on bitcointalk.  I'd love it if somebody dug up all their secrets and shone a bright light on what Yobit is really all about.  It can't be an impossible task.

For reals.   Sadly.... I am kind of at a loss for tracking it down myself.... but members here have had contact from people inside yobit, and thus, maybe some correlations of internet data could be made....   would take a lot of work though.

For a business that deals in as much volume as their site claims....   I can't believe the money and people are untraceable.....
173  Other / Meta / Cryptotalk campaign thread is a mirror echo of the yobit thread... on: December 04, 2019, 09:49:23 PM
Sooo...  This time it didnt take 300 pages of posts for the cryptotalk campaign thread to explode and get locked in the same exact manner as the yobit one.

Same group's campaign, same results.


I am sure there will be comments here on both sides of the field... but honestly, after everything....   I think they need to meet their end...  at least here.

Im seeing the same sigs yabbering back and forth about the topic... and... many times, the replies have already been said and restated yet it perpetuates.


Anyone in on an idea on how we can get to the core of who controls yobit and ultimately bring some transparency to a very shady company?
174  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: XMR-stak-JK 2.10.7 Compiled with no devfee (Updated: 2019-8-18) on: December 03, 2019, 10:50:21 AM

im not certain what you mean...

rx stands for random x....


id go look at fireice's github for notes on compatibility and driver requirement changes...   but... furthermore;   you are wasting an exponential amount of power to mine on a gpu vs ANY cpu for the most part...

That was the purpose of randomx...  to even the playing field so to speak.

Sorry, it was unclear :-)
RX = randomx on the one hand but i thought it also means RX cards (RX458 ...) as far as i know the software doesnt work with R-cards as 280x ...

You are right, AMDs CPUs are better but i still have some old R9 rigs left :-(

yep.  randomx takes advantage of the fact that certain operators (divide, add, subtract, multiply) take certain amounts of time to calculate; and the amount of data that it would need in cache as to be accessed quickly.   It is very clever since ASICS would need that very same circuitry, so it would be redundant by nature.   at least... this is kind of how I understand it.

yeah... its all about optimizing the intensity so that everything stays on the CPU cache; and you get good performance.   If you go over that, performance drops like a rock.
175  Economy / Services / Re: CryptoTalk.Org Signature Campaign [Yobit Panel] on: December 03, 2019, 10:43:31 AM
I wonder why it takes so long to fix the button.

I haven't clicked the "send to my balance" button since like two weeks ago, so my campaign payment is currently stucked there.

This is nothing new with yobit sponsored campaigns.....   They say you can click it;  and that it will work when they top up the account... but last run between account top ups was nearly a year... before that 6-8mo, before that 3 mo, you get the idea....     

They are shady.

The admin has been messaged about the no balance, i'm sure they were already aware either way. Everyone needs to stop spamming this topic or ill lock it again.

sorry yahoo;  but this reply from you feels 100% like history repeating.   Read the end of the yobit sig campaign official thread, and go backwards.   Suddenly;  you see the exact same thing is happening.... 
 which happens to be people discussing this very issue and the compounding problems coming from the lack of payment... only before, the only life line was cut off from then at that point... but right now we actually still have a known person with contact from someone inside yobit.   This is no small thing in the grand picture....

Just trying to help everyone including you by bringing this up.

Also to the people whom are having payout issues:
Show me where they post the payout schedule or payment wallet top up schedule; because to date, they have never provided one.  We can only draw on past experience... which I have provided above for you.


I'm glad in not back with them... would have been free BTC... but not worth the hassle in my eyes.
176  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: XMR-stak-JK 2.10.7 Compiled with no devfee (Updated: 2019-8-18) on: December 03, 2019, 10:08:51 AM
Why only XMR-STAK RX and not R?

All my old rigs stopped because with R9 280x theres no randomx mining soft as far as i know?!

Is there a way to mine randomx coins with these cards?

im not certain what you mean...

rx stands for random x....


id go look at fireice's github for notes on compatibility and driver requirement changes...   but... furthermore;   you are wasting an exponential amount of power to mine on a gpu vs ANY cpu for the most part...

That was the purpose of randomx...  to even the playing field so to speak.
177  Economy / Services / Re: CryptoTalk.Org Signature Campaign [Yobit Panel] on: December 02, 2019, 11:04:04 AM
I wonder why it takes so long to fix the button.

I haven't clicked the "send to my balance" button since like two weeks ago, so my campaign payment is currently stucked there.

This is nothing new with yobit sponsored campaigns.....   They say you can click it;  and that it will work when they top up the account... but last run between account top ups was nearly a year... before that 6-8mo, before that 3 mo, you get the idea....     

They are shady.
178  Other / Meta / Re: Ban account! For what? on: December 02, 2019, 01:16:36 AM
*snip*

What you have to say as of this point does not matter AT ALL.  
From the initial reply, you should have done what you were originally told to do more than once:  Go away.

You are banned.
You have been banned before.
This means:  You are not welcome here.

This can not be put any clearer than the ones before me and myself.   You have shown us that you are not wanted or welcome here because of your manners and postings.



So in the simplest words:  Go away and never come back.
179  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Windows 10 x64 restart problem ? on: November 25, 2019, 05:31:05 AM
check for ripple in your power supply...


That error... makes me think to check there first.  Look for bad capacitors all over the system... any wetting/greasyness of the board is a sign of electrolyte leakage...


You say frequent power outages;  that means frequent current spikes....  the first thing to take the most of it is the power supply...   I have seen PSU issues diagnosed as memory issues commonly in the past.

I have a B250D8P machine that is running solely on windows 10.  Never has shotdown/bootup hiccups at all...  not once.... so there has to be a hardware or software config issue.

Typical diagnostic procedures for PC's comes in at this point, but i'm not gonna hold your hand through that one... sorry.
180  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: BUBBLE || alpha software in testing demo up big news on: November 25, 2019, 01:42:38 AM
I thought the same way I have received support on this thread in growing this project is the same way some old HODLers of this coin would chip in. How wrong I was. Guys on Yobit are just either dumping or trying to crash the price to buy up and re-sell. These dynamics ordinarily should be the norm with any coin, but in this case, let's HODL! Buy up large quantities and HODL. Our plans for the growth of this coin are huge and we haven't even scratched the surface. You think the rise from 20 sats to 500 sats in a few months is huge? You wait a few years and see us get to 0.01BTC. HODL, stock up some more on the exchange, and keep HODLing.

You can look at it this way;  you have a serious chunk of actually known coins on the network.... and known to be in a staking wallet no less.

You will see all the accumulation of 5BUB blocks that have already been adding up....   You effectively control its supply on the outside from this point.


I am 100% positive that once enough bought into it;  they put it offline as to force people to sell and crash it;  in return, people buy it up and they just sell you coins that flat-out do not exist.   The volume was 100% not realistic on BUB.   Check my sig... its in there from when I did the math.   There was no way in hell that many coins got transacted in two days time of such a dead coin (was trading at ~69 sat)....  I mean, it was pretty blatant.

The best thing we can try to do to keep it alive is find somewhere that will list it.... and be honest about it.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 ... 122 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!