I just checked the hash distribution and it turns out this unknown pool has 99% of the hashing power..
Is that not a problem ?
People usually start freeking out when it goes over 51%
where did you check that? I'm guessing "unknown" is not really a pool, it just means the site that does the stats doesn't know who is the miner. It's probably not a single entity. |
|
|
|
Es ist, als würden sich Systemkritiker, Verschwörungstheoretiker, Esoteriker und Polit-Kommentatoren zum Kaffeekränzchen treffen jeden Huster des Kurses zum Anlass nehmen, um mal wieder ihren Standpunkt deutlich zu machen. Vieles davon mag wahr, lesenswert, interessant sein, aber es ist einfach nicht der passende Ort.
Spaßbremse! Und was sagst du so? |
|
|
|
|
Dass Menschen aber auch immer so emotional sein müssen! ;-) (ich übrigens auch, die Journalisten, Politiker und anderen Angst-Treiber und Freiheitseinschränker regen mich sowas von auf, ich kann schon garkeine News mehr lesen. Aber meine Coins verkauf ich deshalb nicht. Dass einige jetzt ein Verbot fordern zeigt ja nur wie stark wir sind. Die Angst ist groß bei den Bitcoin-Hassern.)
Jetzt wird's natürlich interessant, ob die $300 nochmal hält.
Falls nicht verkauf ich einiges von meinem dreckigen Terroristen-Bargeld (Euros).
|
|
|
|
|
Surprising amount of newbie accounts posting statist bullshit and terror fear mongering lately.
|
|
|
|
Well, i just got some coin in my wallet - but a very thinny part. Like only 12-13% of what I asked. Why ? And what can I do ?
did they charge you the withdrawal fee on the 100% or just the part you actually received? Exactly, this is what cryptsy is doing. You make a withdrawel, the substract 0,5% fee, but send only halve of the coins, so you paid a 1,0% fee. I made a complaint over 10 times, never got a proper answer or a refund. Further did the substract 20% or so for 2 times when I withdrew DGB, never got any coin back. Just to give you a view how things are being handled at cryptsy. Thats Why i am Leaving that Place. So where do we trade aur/btc? |
|
|
|
Well, i just got some coin in my wallet - but a very thinny part. Like only 12-13% of what I asked. Why ? And what can I do ?
did they charge you the withdrawal fee on the 100% or just the part you actually received? |
|
|
|
HUGE withdraw fees indeed. Would cost me almost 1k Aur
now we have a lower bound on your AUR stash  Yes i've done it.
very good. |
|
|
|
adblock plus gehört verbannt.
Ich empfehle allen auf uBlock Origins um zusteigen..
Wieso? |
|
|
|
Hi all ! Long time no see  . I took a ''crypto-break'' for the last few month - barely looked at anything crypto related. Earing some nice stuff regarding Aurora . I may grab some more today - im use too. Let's rock it Done. pro-tip: there's rumors of cryptsy having trouble and shit. I'm not sure if there's anything to it, but I'm sure that it often happens that a withdraw will only give you half the AUR because of wallet troubles or whatever. Also note they introduced a withdrawal fee of 1% recently and introduced ridiculously low withdraw limits ($10 per day or something) for people not willing to give their identities. I suggest you withdraw your AUR in case you bought them on cryptsy just to make sure you really have them safely. |
|
|
|
Einer muss es ja mal sagen, neues ATH vor dem 16.11.2015.  I stand corrected.  ziehe meinen Hut davor, daß du selber postest falsch gelegen zu haben. Cool, machen wenige |
|
|
|
that alleged anti-islamic group "ghost security group" registered their domains ghostsecuritygroup.com and reportonlineterrorism.com (really?!?) through a service called "Domains By Proxy". In 2014, Domains by Proxy handed over personal details of a site owner to Motion Picture Association due to allegedly copyright infringement despite the website not hosting any copyrighted files.
that whole "ghost security group" seems fishy to me. Watch the vid on their site... quite well-done propaganda. whole thing smells like bs to me. |
|
|
|
...
Hat da jemand aus Versehen den Buy-Knopf zu lange gedrückt und dann aus Panik gleich wieder verkauft?
...
Zumindest beim Dump hab' ich im Augenwinkel 'ne einzelne 2.6k-Order gesehen. Also ja, Drogen, dicke Finger, Langeweile oder ein Wal wollte einfach seine Kollegen aufwecken.  naja, so dumm ist das nicht. Wir sind wieder mal in so einer "Langeweile-Phase". Das Volumen wird immer geringer und der Kurs malt ein Dreieck. Irgendwann bricht er aus mit hohem Volumen und meistens ist der Sprung dann ganz ordentlich oder mündet gar in einen längerandauernden ab/auf-wärtskanal. Wenn es also soweit ist, kann man vielleicht mit einer dicken Order die richtung bestimmen und schön profitieren. Hat in diesem Falle aber nicht funktioniert, die Feder ist noch nicht genug aufgezogen oder es war die falsche Richtung |
|
|
|
Private property goes pari passu with the state, more specifically with its laws. No state, no private property, because in the wild might is right: if someone stronger than you points at your property and says "that is mine" you can't do nothing but obey or be deprived coercively.
I could easily pay someone even stronger to protect my private property. Doesn't have to be state, does it? |
|
|
|
JP Morgan https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmfOXGjVWRYThis Mega-Bank is Preparing to Launch its Own Bitcoin Competitor aber banken haben ja kein interesse an der bitcoin technology!? posaunte doch jemand gestern!! Dies bank möchte ihren eigenen schaffen, soviel dazu Jede Bank will ihre Blockchain selber kontrollieren. Aber ob die Kunden das wollen? Ich würde soetwas nicht wollen Nicht als Geld, aber ich finde die Banken (oder wer auch immer) haben da schon einen Punkt: Eine blockchain (permission ledger) könnte durchaus Verwendung finden als "settlement layer" für asset trades aller Art. Das hätte diverse Vorteile: zum einen die Möglichkeit Transparanz (paper trail of who did what when). ich habe mal Blythe Masters transskribiert: So, I wouldn't rule that out as a real consequence.
The currency elements of those technologies are not at all their only benefit. The reality is that what is available now is an enourmos efficiency tool you can think of as distributed, encrypted, straight-through processing opportunities to cut out a lot of the inefficiencies in the post trade processing of financial services. Those inefficiencies for example manifested by settlement latency create risk. So if I can buy and sell and equity security in the flash of a nanosecond then my competitive advantage is determined by wether I can get my server closer to the nexus of the market or not. And yet having done that it takes me 2 or 3 days depending on the jurisdiction for the transaction to be completed according to its terms so that cash and the security are exchanged then there is residual counterparty risk in the system, exposure between the buyers and the sellers and all the intermediaries that are involved in processing all that stuff. So if you can reduce settlement time using modern technology you remove a significant source of counterparty risk, a significant requirement for capital in the system (that's operational risk capital and counterparty capital), you remove a politically unpopular source of fritction and loss of returns to the end-investor. And the upside is significant.
So from the point of view of a central bank that is, if properly implemented in a safe and secure manner with systems that are resilient, an unambiguous benefit to the overall strength and health of the financial system. So: not one to be ignored.
[*puts a slight grin on*]
And finally I would add that again, for some of those that were [notunderstandableforme] secrecy and anonymity, sort of turning some of these technology ideas on their head, one enourmous benefit here from distributed technologies is the opportunity to give regulators a direct window on a real-time basis into financial activities along with an immutable track record or ledger of the provenance of transcations - who has done what to whom when - and if the music ever stops for example in the context of a unwinding a resolution situation you know exactly where all of those assets are at any given point in time is a tremendous source of transparency and opportunity for regulators who are interested in promoting systemic stability.
So on balance I would say a lot of what's going on in the technology space can be put to extremely constructive use in the context of the objective of your average central banker.
Ob die Banken es nun hinkriegen, sich gemeinsam auf eine blockchain zu einigen um diese "benefits" ("systemic stability", "enormous transparency") zu erreichen das darf debattiert werden. Aber ein Vorteil für "die Kunden" könnte das schon sein wenn das Finanzsystem auf einmal stabiler dasteht und man verdammt nochmal weiss, wem was gehört. Das ist natürlich dann ein gewisser Migrationspfad der dann notwendig wird, hehe. Muss man ja erstmal klären, wem jetzt was gehört. Na, damit viel Spass. Das wird Jahrzehnte dauern. Aber ich persönlich hab nix dagegen, daß "Blockchain Technologie" so eingesetzt wird. Hat aber alles erstmal wenig mit Bitcoin (the money) zu tun. Da wurde der Plan ja von Jamie Dimon verkündet (governments will not allow money out of their control) und da wird's dann interessant... (einige finden (ich auch): "freedom of transaction and use of private money is a human right, civil liberty") |
|
|
|
Kennen wir das nicht irgendwoher?  Bitcoin Past-based Prediction Porn? |
|
|
|
I hope the masterluc is ok. Reminded me of this post in summer Without this thread I think I'd already was dead, because last bubble informational and emotional pressure put me in deep hypertensive crisis despite I earned a lot of money.
Poor master  Didn't he bail before the dump? so he can buy in lower now. Happy days. I think he sold at that good old upper trend line, around $320. Too lazy to dig it up, should be a couple pages back. But if correct then yes: he could get back in . I doubt he would, though. |
|
|
|
I hope the masterluc is ok. Reminded me of this post in summer Without this thread I think I'd already was dead, because last bubble informational and emotional pressure put me in deep hypertensive crisis despite I earned a lot of money.
|
|
|
|
Any updates?
We'd have to get to $10,000 or so to be anywhere near the trend of this chart, while it's not impossable, right now it's doubtful this chart is even accurate still. Let's see what the next few months bring, maybe we can draw some more conclusions then. See: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=383674.0Next growth spurt will go to 10^4 (5th growth spurt) and $10k also happens to be of the 10^4 magnitude (in fact it's exactly 10^4). Coincidence? I doubt it It's too early to resurrect the linked thread, but when it's time, it will be epic |
|
|
|
Saw this on Cryptsy chat JShock ♔
Most BTC LTC and DASH w/ds are currently stuck due to tech issues. This progressively got worse over the past week and were trying to find the reason they are not going out. Please understand that due to extremely high security this a very complex system and the problem is still being resolved sounds like txid malleability attack? |
|
|
|
|
to anyone who did tier 1 verification (personal data), how fast was it and does anyone know what kind of checks (if any) they do?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
