Bitcoin Forum
July 06, 2024, 01:22:41 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 [90] 91 92 93 94 »
1781  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: August 01, 2017, 09:42:51 AM
Just a rich spoiled troll dumped 1K BTC on dumpfinex when it was on its way to the new ATH. I watch his 200-500-1000 walls for some time. He never makes profit, just enjoys hurting everyone else. Probably Jihan Wu or his puppet. Nothing new... I hope FBI closes too that exchange  Huh
1782  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Fork 1:1 of Bitcoin - Pro on-chain scaling on: August 01, 2017, 08:46:13 AM
I wish dumpfinex will be closed by FBI and all dumpsters lose their coins  Angry
1783  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: July 30, 2017, 06:15:31 AM
Jihan Wu dumped 3K bitcoin on bitfiniex in 5 mins. Only 1% damage. He will see what a real dump is on his BCC on 1 Aug  Grin
1784  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: July 29, 2017, 08:07:51 AM


Yes. In my math, $403 is exactly between 1% and 2% of $2759. </s>


And you call that math?!?!? Jesus, I wonder how many 'traders' trade by such math  Grin
1785  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: July 27, 2017, 09:08:16 PM
Jesus, those 1-2K sell walls at 2600 in bitfinex eaten so fast Shocked
1786  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: July 27, 2017, 02:24:56 PM
1787  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: July 26, 2017, 11:49:41 AM
The longer btc-e is down, the lower the price will go on speculation that yet another exchange was hacked.

May be an exit scam, may be not:
http://www.livebitcoinnews.com/unscheduled-data-center-outage-keeps-btc-e-exchange-offline/
1788  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: July 25, 2017, 08:18:42 AM
Look at the requirements for 32M blocks, 400GB daily, 128Gb ram.
At 32M, this excludes 95% of the current bitcoin nodes creating almost total miner centralisation.

There's this new coin called physical silver bitchez that fixes horrific bitcoin centralization, blockchain bloat, and scaling.
....
Because the sheklers at Goldman Sachs told people to buy bitcoin with both hands, which means it's probably going to 12 cents

None of the above statements is sane. R0ach, we all know your story. You were really 'smart' to buy silver around 50$ instead of bitcoin which was 200-300$. Now the silver is 16$ and bitcoin is 3000$. Silver hardly ever will return to 50$, while bitcoin will continue to rise.  You can still cover your losses and buy bitcoins, if you are not broke of course  Tongue.
1789  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: July 23, 2017, 01:00:08 PM
So what do the bits in the charts show?

Is there a BCC fork going on?

I don't know if the traders are panic selling due to this 'cash' rumors or is just the usual Sunday dip. What we know for now is that 2 exchanges - viabtc and okex will accept BCC - the new cash fork. Only Wu knows if he is going to activate HF on 1st August... for now. The situation of ethereum was absolutely different. Eth HF wasn't decided by Vitalik alone but with voting of the whole community - both owners of ETH and miners. Each miner has a vote according to his hashing power so it was a community decision. Now Wu acts alone as the bitcoin villain. Not very different are also Ver and Wright of course with their moron 'projects'. Btw, my advice for everybody is to store your coins on cold wallets until the storm passes. Then you can split the conis and dump the BCC or whatever shit is called Wu's altcoin. It is unclear which exchanges will accept BCC and make the split for their customers.
1790  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: July 23, 2017, 08:59:00 AM
If viabtc begins trading ABC (http://bitcoinist.com/viabtc-begins-trading-bitcoin-cash-bcc-for-chinese-yuan-cny-in-anticipation-of-uahf/) does this mean that there will be HF chain split at 1 Aug? In that case, the drop of price will continue indefinitely and Jihan Wu will curse the day he made that shit  Huh


I think everyone should take a sigh of relief, the big blockers are going to fork off and effectively create their own altcoin.
This gives the possibility of an amicable divorce.
The markets can decide the outcome and the petty fighting and trolling can reduce.

Plus, a successful fork to BitcoinCash means that 2x part of Segwit2x has less likelihood of being supported and causing another more damaging fork in November.

NYA is still valid and there will be a HF in November. There is a possibility of 100% support so there could be no chain split. On the other hand, ABC was initially proposed as a counter strike to UASF suggested by core's developers who wanted to make it with nodes and change in POW. However, this will not happen. I am really surprised that after the lesson of the Bip 91 Wu and probably Ver still insist on their 'projects'. They clearly saw that the bitcoin economy is against any chain split and will punish any man no matter how great he think he is. Such splits are endangering the upward trend of the BTC as everyone on this planet saw this Summer.
1791  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: July 23, 2017, 08:29:13 AM
If viabtc begins trading ABC (http://bitcoinist.com/viabtc-begins-trading-bitcoin-cash-bcc-for-chinese-yuan-cny-in-anticipation-of-uahf/) does this mean that there will be HF chain split at 1 Aug? In that case, the drop of price will continue indefinitely and Jihan Wu will curse the day he made that shit  Huh
1792  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: July 22, 2017, 08:20:21 AM
1000 BTC buy wal at 2800 at Bitfiniex...

Looks like we are gonna get a nice weekend pump  Grin go go BTC $2778,- at Kraken atm
Another 600+100 at 2820!!! I will bring the popcorn and watch the show!  Cool
1793  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: July 22, 2017, 08:11:53 AM
1000 BTC buy wall at 2800 at Bitfiniex... Only Kraken is sleeping...
1794  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: July 21, 2017, 09:39:39 AM
UPDATE ON ATH ATH ATH ATH GAME                LAAAAAAAAAST CALLL             LAAAST CHANCE FREE    BTC      BETS WITHIN 24 H, NO BETS TAKEN ANYMORE AFTER 21/07 23:22 (CET)



18 Aug ATH. Reason: Segwith gets activated.
1795  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: July 21, 2017, 08:39:57 AM
UPDATE ON ATH ATH ATH ATH GAME                LAAAAAAAAAST CALLL             LAAAST CHANCE FREE    BTC      BETS WITHIN 24 H, NO BETS TAKEN ANYMORE AFTER 21/07 23:22 (CET)




My bet for ATH is 17.08. Reason: the Segwith will be activated by then and Jihan Wu will abandon his ABC project.
1796  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The Barry Silbert segwit2x agreement with >80% miner support. on: July 20, 2017, 11:11:17 AM
Exactly as I expected, miners signalled for Segwit2x, now they slowly withdraw hashpower to prevent Segwit from activating. Is anyone here smart enough to tell me what happens if Segwit "locks" but doesn't "activate" (scheduled to be around mid-August according to my reading). Imagine August 1: BIP148 tries to take over, BitcoinABC begins mining, Segwit2x is in flux, and the world is watching...
....

On the positive side, maybe ABC will be a new chain with value. Sort of like a stock split - maybe existing coin will be worth something on both BTC and BABC blockchains... But I doubt 148Coin will last more than a few days... These morons crooning about "POW change" can do each other up the azzes...




You describe Core's plan B actually, when Segwit is not supported by enough miners. Then there WILL be a permanent POW change, so you will not be able to mine bitcoins, only the new ABC fork.
1797  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The Barry Silbert segwit2x agreement with >80% miner support. on: July 19, 2017, 01:00:09 PM
Ver should just start his own coin - Vercoin! I have a feeling Roger will signal BU till the very bitter end.


I've been asking the same question myself. The aswer probably is that Ver isn't a good programmer/cryptographer to invent a new coin. The whitepapers of ethereum and zcash for example are way beyond his IQ capacity  Grin Another reason is that if a coin is a fork to bitcoin it will attract more the pump groups in Poloniex.
1798  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: July 19, 2017, 06:58:28 AM
It seems that the danger of segwit-failure-fork is (almost) gone. However, there still remains the HF in 3 months, so the price won't go as far as we wish. Besides, Roger Ver and Jihan Wu still want to make use of the situation and fork their own altcoins. These 'inverstors' like to buy new coins and pump them with the help of their associates in Poloniex. They may have a general notion of blockchain but they are ignorant of the cryptography  embedded in the white papers of the leading altcoins like ethereum and zcash. Unfortunately BU and/or ABC can emerge anytime and survive as forks even with their present hashrate. As always, the common bitcoin holders are at the mercy of the big whales. I would prefer a POW change that will make useless the asics and return the mining to the gpu's and cpu's. Btw the above mentioned altcoins have a code that prevents the asic technology to take advantage over gpu's, so the china dominion would be over for good. Then we will have a really decentralized bitcoin.
1799  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: July 18, 2017, 10:07:20 AM
This is today's question: https://themerkle.com/are-cryptocurrencies-recovering-or-is-this-a-dead-cat-bounce/  Grin
1800  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: July 15, 2017, 08:29:37 AM
If you do have fiat, set sub 2000 bids up.  I did a week ago.

Can't see it holding all the way to the 1st at this rate whatever happens.  And if Segwit signalling doesn't look close at the end of the month it will get messier still; you may be looking at today's price with a wistful nostalgic sigh.

Note:  been away, and about to head off again to where it's light until midnight. However, I'm very happy with the WO survival...  and congrats to infofront for being brave enough to take on the thread. Right man for the job IMHO.

for a very new guy like me, how far do you acctually think the price will drop

and off my stash of btc that i have been buying (actually not knowing what i was buying ) for 1.5year  never sold a coin still just keep holding ??



Keep buying! Downside is very limited. We'll see >10000 by the end of this year.


thanks for the advice the last days where breathe taking Smiley Smiley  but just to learn understand what do you think acctualy is happening now or is going to happing ( explaind in easy terms and easy english cause i'm normal dutch speaking Smiley   )

and i will keep buying dips then

Take any advice here with a bit of salt. There are some users like Lauda who are well known for manupulating people to rob their money.
Pages: « 1 ... 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 [90] 91 92 93 94 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!