Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 12:01:21 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 »
181  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: BETTING STREAK COMPETITION * * COINBET24 * * FREE TO ENTER * * 50 mBTC on: January 25, 2018, 08:12:15 PM
Match: Club Brugge vs Oostende
Prediction 2-1
Userid : 0016849
182  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: January 25, 2018, 03:44:49 PM
If nothing else, seeing people have gotten hundreds of merits in the first few hours of this rollout should make it pretty clear who is abusing multiple accounts on this forum. Smiley
Its actually good for catching alts of someone.
Stupid people will always indulge in sending merits to their alt accounts
183  Other / Meta / Re: DefaultTrust (DT) Network - DT1/2 Members on: January 24, 2018, 03:09:32 PM
Remind me again how much time OgNasty has invested in fighting the scum of this forum, either by directly tagging them or *recruiting* DT2 members to do so? Oh right, from what I've seen, almost zero.
I've protected far more BTC for users on this forum than you ever will..
Like who, NastyFans? Watch out for the QS kool-aid, it can be damaging. Roll Eyes

and see little value in your harassing new users with negative feedback if their posts aren't of high enough quality for your liking.
Which is absolutely not something that I'm doing. It's nice to see that you are actually up-to-date with the stuff when trying to undermine others. Grin

Why did I get a sudden reminder of butter? Wait, that must be spelled differently.
Lauda
Please, get off this forums for a few days and see how a civilized and a world with freedom works.
You are possessed by your false sense of judgement and heroism. I am really not trying to be offensive against you, its just pity i feel for you.
184  Other / Meta / Re: DefaultTrust (DT) Network - DT1/2 Members on: January 24, 2018, 03:04:31 PM
I will just keep it short and simple
DT2 have a lot of flaws in their sense of judgement.
Lauda has negative trusted me by "assuming" that my service was a fraud while i had every proof of it being a legit service.
I've been a part of this forums since 2014 and Lauda won't even consider once to respect a fellow user's explanations. He simply never replied to my PMs and blocked me.
On top of it all, when i started proving myself legit he gave me another totally unrelated negative trust.
I've been reading Lauda's post since so many years, his sense of judgement is getting more and more possessed by a hunger of power and sense of heroism.
185  Economy / Reputation / Re: Red Trust - While I never cheated or scammed anyone on: January 24, 2018, 03:00:27 AM
Do you even understand what you're saying?
It's like saying, we don't need stupid people in society so we should start putting them in jails / killing them.
Every human society, every platform will have stupid posts and opinions. Bitcointalk is no different, these opinions and inadequate knowledge don't deserve negative trust.
Spam and one liners does.
Your analogy is incompliant with the way forums work.
If negative trust is equivalent to killing people, then what are bans? Torturing them? Here's the deal, and tell me if you can understand this:

Would you agree with sending out a temporary ban given bad post quality?

If yes, then would you agree with a temporary negative feedback given bad post quality?

The thing is, in the latter case, the feedback can be removed with better post quality and thus there will be no subsequent offenses. With a ban, where's the improvement?
Remark: if we use your analogy in a less severe case, negative trust can be considered suspensions whereas bans can be considered expulsions. Tell me, which one would you rather have?
It would be perfect if the negative trust for bad post quality is temporary. But I highly doubt you or any of other DT would have time to monitor post quality of everyone you gave negative trust to.
Even if someone appeal for removal of the negative after improving their post quality, I am almost certainly sure they will be laughed upon and not taken seriously.
Again, I repeat spam and one liners deserve negative trust. Wrong opinions and misinformation does not.
186  Economy / Gambling / Re: SEKABET.COM - LEADING SPORTSBOOK & LIVE CASINO IN EUROPE on: January 24, 2018, 02:24:50 AM
I wish people could blame them less and not start calling them a scam outright. You might call them inexperienced but calling them scam for a no reason is not right.
Also, do I need kyc to play here? What is average withdrael time?

And a site can scam even with a licence and wont even without one. Licence seems not so necessary when you are talking of "Bitcoin" involved in here.

Edit : Talked to support on whatsapp. They require kyc.
187  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: BETTING STREAK COMPETITION * * COINBET24 * * FREE TO ENTER * * 50 mBTC on: January 24, 2018, 02:00:58 AM
Wednesday     24/01:  Sampdoria vs AS Roma
Prediction 1-2
Userid : 0016849
188  Economy / Reputation / Re: Red Trust - While I never cheated or scammed anyone on: January 23, 2018, 03:27:21 PM
Do you even understand what you're saying?
It's like saying, we don't need stupid people in society so we should start putting them in jails / killing them.

It is nothing like saying that. You must be the one that didn't understand what I said.

Every human society, every platform will have stupid posts and opinions. Bitcointalk is no different, these opinions and inadequate knowledge don't deserve negative trust.
Spam and one liners does.

It has nothing to do with being stupid or wrong. It is about posts that add absolutely nothing to the debate and are made entirely for the reason of getting paid. There is no reason to post on a thread that already has 199 pages. Nobody is ever going to read it and it adds nothing to the forum except noise. How many lines are in a post has no bearing on whether it is spam or not.

It's up to campaign managers to mark and not select users they believe only post rubbish to get their money. they don't deserve DTs to negative trust for this.
Again, something that doesn't contribute to the discussion is a spam. Any other opinion, even totally incorrect shall always be allowed. 
I won't be arguing anymore. I think you're just trying to get on the good side of DTs and their reputation abuse.

189  Economy / Reputation / Re: Red Trust - While I never cheated or scammed anyone on: January 23, 2018, 03:07:26 PM
Look at the posts of legendaries and heroes doing signature campaign, they're nothing new and repetition of what so many users have already said.

A lot of higher ranked accounts have been hacked and/or sold and many of them also shitpost. Two wrongs do not make a right.

This isn't a reason to neg anyone.
One liners and spams are.

That is a matter of opinion and in this case, I do not share yours. Posts like the one quoted above that say absolutely nothing and that are made for no reason other than to increase post count and get paid pollute this forum. The administrator of the forum will not do anything to address this problem, so some people on the DT list have decided to tackle it in a different way. That's not ideal but at least something is being done.
Do you even understand what you're saying?
It's like saying, we don't need stupid people in society so we should start putting them in jails / killing them.
Every human society, every platform will have stupid posts and opinions. Bitcointalk is no different, these opinions and inadequate knowledge don't deserve negative trust.
Spam and one liners does.
190  Economy / Reputation / Re: Red Trust - While I never cheated or scammed anyone on: January 23, 2018, 02:49:05 PM
This is not a shit post nor a reason to negative trust someone. If someone is less knowledgable/has wrong understanding of a concept he doesn't deserves to be negged.
I am sure OP had spam/1 liner posts that made someone neg trust him for being a spammer.

This was the post quoted in the reference to the trust feedback. It is the very definition if shitpost. It says absolutely nothing of any meaning and is buried on page 199 of a thread that hundreds of people have already said the same thing.

Look at the posts of legendaries and heroes doing signature campaign, they're nothing new and repetition of what so many users have already said.
This isn't a reason to neg anyone.
One liners and spams are.
191  Economy / Gambling / Re: Coinbet24.com – The #1 Bitcoin Sportsbook on: January 23, 2018, 02:45:46 PM
Do i require kyc to withdraw bitcoin?
Can someone vouch for the average withdrawl time?
192  Economy / Reputation / Re: shitposter must read on: January 23, 2018, 02:30:28 PM
Please note that in the rules writes clearly: "- Do not rate people based on the quality of their posts."

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=211858.msg2221664#msg2221664

So, HE broke the rules!!!!!! Negative rates are to semnalize scammers, not "shitpost" by your arbitrary point of view.
Those are not rules, they are guidelines. There is a huge difference between those two words; a difference which any decent English speaker should be aware of. Whining won't really help you, shitposters.

Thank you to call me "shitposter", I'm relatively new here and from the last messages in this thread now I understand that:
-Legendaries are almighty and right by definition
-They support each other a priori
-They have godlike power to judge people
-if they don't like something you do they can destroy you without any explication

I understand that this kind of power can be addicting (I'm just expecting to be banned forever, just as a demonstration of power), but if the aim - out of ego celebration - is to improve the content on the forum, you are all deadly wrong, as all you will obtain is that everyone - knowing that can be banned in any moment just by an arbitrary opinion of someone - will create more and more account, and of course more and more shit post.

I don't think it's good result, but, as you all are right by definition and we are all piece of shit, we need to accept it.
Oh, well....

PS Why don't you create - as in any dictatorship - a rule that says that someone can post something only after your approbation?
So the forum well become a good copy of NorthKorea or Stalinian Russia.





Hello?
I am legendary and i got negative trust for almost nothing
we don't have any power. You stupid?
Everyone is judged equally here.
193  Economy / Reputation / Re: Red Trust - While I never cheated or scammed anyone on: January 23, 2018, 02:24:37 PM
The trust system as its name implies is simply for people to say whether or not they trust you.

In the spam mega thread "Does the Price of Bitcoin Matter?" you posted this.

Well, I don't actually think the price of bitcoin can really matter because people can still buy fractions of bitcoin no matter the price. Unless if people are trying to own or accumulate complete bitcoin. Sometimes people have a problem they don't care about anything when it was cheap and by the time when it is expensive then everybody will be talking about.  

Giving advice like that I'm not surprised someone doesn't trust you.


Shut up.
This is not a shit post nor a reason to negative trust someone. If someone is less knowledgable/has wrong understanding of a concept he doesn't deserves to be negged.
I am sure OP had spam/1 liner posts that made someone neg trust him for being a spammer.
194  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: COINBET24.COM * * HOCKEY STREAK COMPETITION * * FREE TO ENTER * * 100 mBTC on: January 23, 2018, 02:22:40 PM
Tuesday         23/01:  (Liiga) TPS Turku vs Hameenlinna
Predictio. 3-2
Userid : 0016849
195  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: BETTING STREAK COMPETITION * * COINBET24 * * FREE TO ENTER * * 50 mBTC on: January 23, 2018, 02:19:59 PM
23/01:  Waregem vs St. Liege     
Prediction 2-1
Userid : 0016849
196  Economy / Services / Re: FREE Bitcoin Transaction Accelerator (New) on: January 22, 2018, 01:40:44 PM
Please accelerate my transaction.
Been waiting for it to confirm for a long time now😢
8c8612af389828077c9374297dad91ac17e4b1987b790418d0ad93680f7e8b31

Added
Still has 0 confirmations..... Is there something wrong with the transaction? Please help me complete this transaction.
8c8612af389828077c9374297dad91ac17e4b1987b790418d0ad93680f7e8b31..Hey bro please accelerate .. I’m frequing out cause India seems to be banning all cryptos 😭😭😭😭😭huge crackdown by the banks over here.... so I wanna convert all my btc to Fiat asap...plz help...
Where the fuck is it banning cryptos?
197  Economy / Gambling / Re: WBet7.com - Sport bet accept ETH, ETC, BTC, BCH, DOGE, LTC, DASH, VTC, MONA... on: January 22, 2018, 02:29:58 AM
I love this site. I played with Doge and VTC deposits, though lost it all in games but I must say that the site is just awesome, the time taken to settle the bets is usually less than 3 minutes after the match gets over. The deposits were also instant after 1 confirmation. Love the site, no extra javascript bullshit. Never tried withdrawing, so dont know much about withdraw time.
198  Economy / Reputation / Re: 100% sure Lauda is a fraudster on: January 20, 2018, 04:26:46 PM
Just minutes after I made a free comment on this post

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.280

he gave me a negative trust.

It is lucky that I have not wasted much time on this site.


This is another kind of extortion attempt. It is an indirect way of telling, "Stay away from speaking against me, or you will be negatively tagged". Lauda was an extortionist / a bully and will always remain one. The misuse of her power to hide her sins will only end once she is thrown out of Default Trust list. Then only people will be able to voice themselves against her without any fear of getting negatively tagged.
199  Economy / Reputation / Re: Forum's stand in regards to users that have Free Tx accelerators threads on: January 20, 2018, 01:01:14 PM
Time isnt far when Ill get a message from Lauda asking money to remove the neg trust, another indirect extortion attempt from another no life internet bully.
Yep, your rating is now permanent for the trust farming and defamatory bullshit. I already blocked you yesterday.

Disclaimer: I have never, and will never, ask anyone for funds to change a negative trust rating. If someone receives such a message, it may be spoofed or I may be compromised1.
[1] Tag and notify DT members immediately in this, unlikely, case.
This was a perfect reply to show how much fake self pride you've got and what a bully you are.
Telling something to you is just equivalent to teaching a cow how to climb trees.

EDIT- of course you will give me another negative for something completely different and irrelevant, in case your current negative is proved baseless, which it already is.
You've always been this way Lauda, acting like a white knight of justice on this forums while you are nothing more than a bully.
200  Economy / Reputation / Re: Forum's stand in regards to users that have Free Tx accelerators threads on: January 20, 2018, 12:37:14 PM
I have proofs to show that I used to pay ViaBTC for accelerating transactions, but there is no use of explaining it to a bully like Lauda. I have now got another negative trust from him.
Time isnt far when Ill get a message from Lauda asking money to remove the neg trust, another indirect extortion attempt from another no life internet bully.
He will just ignore everything and out of his ego keep giving you negs, thats just misuse of your power, it was given to keep the forum clean and not to spread fud. Bullies like Lauda are saddening.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!